XML 30 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
6 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCMENTS  
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
NOTE 2—RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

FASB ASU 2011-04. In May 2011, the FASB issued FASB ASU 2011-04, which clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, and changes some of the principles and disclosures of fair value measurement to achieve convergence between US GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. We adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2012. The initial adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
FASB ASU 2011-08. In September 2011, the FASB issued FASB ASU 2011-08, which allows entities testing for impairment of goodwill the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of a reporting unit in step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is more than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test.  We adopted this ASU effective October 1, 2012.  We do not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

FASB ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01. In December 2011, the FASB issued FASB ASU 2011-11, which requires entities to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on an entity's financial position. The amendments require enhanced disclosures about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (i) offset in accordance with current literature or (ii) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with current literature. ASU 2011-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. This standard will become effective for us beginning October 2013. In January 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-01, Scope Clarification of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, to limit the scope of the new balance sheet offsetting disclosure requirements to derivatives (including bifurcated embedded derivatives), repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions. As we are not party to any derivatives, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowing and lending transactions we do not expect the adoption of these standards will have a material impact on the presentation of or disclosures within our financial statements.

FASB ASU 2012-02.  In July 2012 the FASB issued FASB ASU 2012-02 regarding the testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment.  Under this accounting standard, an entity will have an option to forego the annual calculation of the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset if the entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the asset is impaired.  Permitting an entity to assess qualitative factors when testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment results in guidance that is similar to the goodwill impairment testing guidance.  This is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  We do not believe the adoption of this standard will have any impact on our financial statements or results of operations.