XML 70 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Commitments And Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments And Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
We lease office space, equipment and automobiles under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates through May 2018. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014 was $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. We record rent expense on a straight–line basis based on contractual lease payments.
Future minimum lease payments due under all non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2015
 
$
873

2016
 
849

2017
 
860

2018
 
360

2019
 

Thereafter
 

Total minimum lease payments
 
$
2,942


For purposes of the table above, the operating lease obligations exclude common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance expenses.
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
We have unconditional inventory related purchase obligations to certain suppliers for certain commodities in order to ensure supply of select key components at the most favorable pricing. Additionally, we have non-inventory related purchase obligations that represent purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business. At December 31, 2014, we had approximately $47.4 million of unconditional purchase obligations, of which $0.9 million for excess purchase commitments was recorded in Accrued Expenses on the balance sheet.
Cumulative Translation Adjustment
If we liquidate any of our foreign subsidiaries, our cumulative translation adjustment recorded in Other Comprehensive Income would be required to be reclassified into earnings. As discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company currently anticipates liquidation of its Netherlands operating unit during early 2015. The Netherlands operating unit currently has no active operations. Cumulative translation losses of approximately $2.7 million related to the Netherlands operating unit would be reclassified from other comprehensive loss to operating loss.
Legal Proceedings
We are not party to any significant legal proceedings, except as described below, but are involved in certain legal actions and claims from time to time arising in the ordinary course of business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
Crossroads, Inc. - During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Company met with Crossroads Inc., or Crossroads, to establish a framework to resolve the dispute regarding the Amended Settlement and License Agreement dated October 2006. On September 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas partially granted the Company’s motion for partial summary judgment as to Crossroads’ claims concerning royalty payments on product sales to HP for the period after the Fall of 2011 and at the same time held that the Company is not entitled to the benefit of a license Crossroads granted to HP for the period prior to fall 2011. In addition, a patent claim construction hearing occurred on October 6-7, 2014 but no claim construction order was issued and no trial date has been set. On February 27, 2015, the Company filed motions to join two inter partes reviews of the validity of the patent that are being conducted by the United States Patent Office and filed a motion to stay the district court litigation pending the entry of final written decisions in the inter partes reviews. No trial date has been set. Based on the United States District Court’s response to the Company’s motion for partial summary judgment and ongoing discussions with Crossroads, it is probable that the Company will resolve this dispute for royalty payments from 2009 to the current period for a total amount in the range of $1.0 million to $3.4 million. As of December 31, 2014, $1.0 million was accrued and charged to general and administrative expense. We are in the early stages of the potential settlement of this matter.  Accordingly, the actual amount of a settlement could be different than the amount accrued or the currently estimated maximum amount and the difference could be material.