XML 48 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Insurance
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Insurance [Abstract]  
Insurance Insurance
Cash and securities owned by U.S.-based insurance subsidiaries, having a carrying value of approximately $1.12 billion at December 31, 2020, were on deposit as required by regulatory authorities. AFG and its subsidiaries had $308 million in undrawn letters of credit (none of which was collateralized) and similar agreements supporting Neon’s underwriting capacity, which were terminated in connection with the December 2020 sale of Neon.

Property and Casualty Insurance Reserves   Estimating the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) is inherently judgmental and is influenced by factors that are subject to significant variation. Determining the liability is a complex process incorporating input from many areas of the Company including actuarial, underwriting, pricing, claims and operations management.

The process used to determine the total reserve for liabilities involves estimating the ultimate incurred losses and LAE, adjusted for amounts already paid on the claims. The IBNR reserve is derived by first estimating the ultimate unpaid reserve liability and subtracting case reserves for loss and LAE.

In determining management’s best estimate of the ultimate liability, management (with the assistance of Company actuaries) considers items such as the effect of inflation on medical, hospitalization, material, repair and replacement costs, the nature and maturity of lines of insurance, general economic trends and the legal environment. In addition, historical trends adjusted for changes in underwriting standards, policy provisions, product mix and other factors are analyzed using actuarial reserve development techniques. Weighing all of the factors, the management team determines a single or “point” estimate that it records as its best estimate of the ultimate liability. Ranges of loss reserves are not developed by Company actuaries. This reserve analysis and review is completed each quarter and for almost every business within AFG’s property and casualty insurance sub-segments.

Each quarterly review includes in-depth analysis of several hundred subdivisions of the business, employing multiple actuarial techniques. For each subdivision, actuaries use informed, professional judgment to adjust these techniques as necessary to respond to specific conditions in the data or within the business.

Some of the standard actuarial methods employed for the quarterly reserve analysis may include (but may not be limited to):
Case Incurred Development Method
Paid Development Method
Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method
Incremental Paid LAE to Paid Loss Methods

Each method has particular strengths and weaknesses and no single estimation method is most accurate in all situations. When applied to a particular group of claims, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method can change over time based on the facts and circumstances. Ultimately, the estimation methods chosen are those which the actuary believes produce the most reliable indication for the particular liabilities under review.
The period of time from the event triggering a claim through the settlement of the liability is referred to as the “tail”. Generally, the same actuarial methods are considered for both short-tail and long-tail lines of business because most of them work properly for both. The methods are designed to incorporate the effects of the differing length of time to settle particular claims. For nearly all lines of business, the actuaries rely heavily on the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method for more recent accident periods. As accident years mature and the underlying claim data becomes more credible, more weight is given to the Case Incurred and Paid Development methods. This transition occurs relatively quickly for short-tailed lines, and over a number of years for long-tail lines. Liability claims for long-tail lines are more susceptible to litigation and can be significantly affected by changing contract interpretation and the legal environment. Therefore, the estimation of loss reserves for these classes is more complex and subject to a higher degree of variability.

The level of detail in which data is analyzed varies among the different lines of business. Data is generally analyzed by major product or by coverage within product, using countrywide data; however, in some situations, data may be reviewed by state or region. Appropriate segmentation of the data is determined based on data credibility, homogeneity of development patterns, mix of business, and other actuarial considerations.

Supplementary statistical information is also reviewed to determine which methods are most appropriate to use or if adjustments are needed to particular methods. Such information includes:
Open and closed claim counts
Average case reserves and average incurred on open claims
Closure rates and statistics related to closed and open claim percentages
Average closed claim severity
Ultimate claim severity
Reported loss ratios
Projected ultimate loss ratios
Loss payment patterns

Within each business, results of individual methods are reviewed, supplementary statistical information is analyzed, and data from underwriting, operating and claim management are considered in deriving management’s best estimate of the ultimate liability. This estimate may be the result of one method, a weighted average of several methods, or a judgmental selection as the management team determines is appropriate.

The liability for losses and LAE for a very limited number of claims with long-term scheduled payments under certain workers’ compensation policies has been discounted at 3.5% at December 31, 2020 and 4.5% at December 31, 2019, which represents an approximation of long-term investment yields. Because of the limited amount of claims involved, the net impact of discounting did not materially impact AFG’s total liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (net reductions from discounting of $9 million and $12 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively).
The following table provides an analysis of changes in the liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses over the past three years (in millions):
202020192018
Balance at beginning of period$10,232 $9,741 $9,678 
Less reinsurance recoverables, net of allowance3,024 2,942 2,957 
Net liability at beginning of period7,208 6,799 6,721 
Provision for losses and LAE occurring in the current year3,398 3,414 3,195 
Net increase (decrease) in the provision for claims of prior years:
Special A&E charges47 18 18 
Neon exited lines19 — 
Other(193)(168)(210)
Total losses and LAE incurred3,271 3,271 3,003 
Payments for losses and LAE of:
Current year(990)(1,076)(963)
Prior years(1,766)(1,790)(1,639)
Total payments(2,756)(2,866)(2,602)
Reserves of businesses disposed (*)(449)— (319)
Foreign currency translation and other(4)
Net liability at end of period7,275 7,208 6,799 
Add back reinsurance recoverables, net of allowance3,117 3,024 2,942 
Gross unpaid losses and LAE included in the balance sheet$10,392 $10,232 $9,741 
(*)Reflects the December 31, 2020 sale of Neon (see Note B — “Acquisitions and Sale of Businesses”) and the reinsurance to close transactions at Neon, which settled in early 2018 (discussed below).

The 2020 provision for losses and LAE occurring in the current year includes $115 million of COVID-19 related losses at AFG, including $20 million recorded by the Neon exited lines.

The net decrease in the provision for claims of prior years in 2020 reflects (i) lower than expected claim frequency and severity in the aviation, transportation and agricultural businesses (within the Property and transportation sub-segment), (ii) lower than anticipated claim severity in the workers’ compensation businesses and lower than anticipated claim frequency in the executive liability business (within the Specialty casualty sub-segment) and (iii) lower than anticipated claim frequency in the trade credit business and lower than anticipated claim frequency and severity in the financial institutions, fidelity and surety businesses (within the Specialty financial sub-segment). This favorable development was partially offset by (i) the $47 million special charge to increase asbestos and environmental reserves and adverse reserve development of $19 million on Neon’s exited lines of business, (ii) higher than expected claim frequency and severity in general liability contractor claims and the excess and surplus and excess liability businesses and higher than anticipated claim severity in the targeted markets businesses (within the Specialty casualty sub-segment), and (iii) net adverse reserve development related to business outside the Specialty group that AFG no longer writes..

The net decrease in the provision for claims of prior years in 2019 reflects (i) lower than expected claim frequency and severity at National Interstate and lower than expected losses in the crop business (all within the Property and transportation sub-segment), (ii) lower than anticipated claim frequency and severity in the workers’ compensation businesses (within the Specialty casualty sub-segment), and (iii) lower than expected claim frequency and severity in the surety and financial institutions businesses and lower than anticipated claim severity in the foreign credit business (all within the Specialty financial sub-segment). This favorable development was partially offset by (i) the $18 million special charge to increase asbestos and environmental reserves and adverse reserve development of $7 million on Neon’s exited lines of business, (ii) higher than expected claim severity in the excess and surplus lines businesses and higher than expected claim frequency in product liability contractor claims (all within the Specialty casualty sub-segment), and (iii) net adverse reserve development related to business outside the Specialty group that AFG no longer writes.

The net decrease in the provision for claims of prior years in 2018 reflects (i) lower than expected losses in the crop business and lower than expected claim severity at National Interstate (within the Property and transportation sub-segment), (ii) lower than anticipated claim severity in the workers’ compensation businesses, lower than expected emergence in assumed 2017 property catastrophe losses at Neon and lower than expected claim severity in the executive liability business (within the Specialty casualty sub-segment) and (iii) lower than expected claim frequency and severity in
the surety business, lower than expected claim severity in the fidelity business and lower than expected claim frequency in run-off businesses (within the Specialty financial sub-segment). This favorable development was partially offset by (i) the $18 million special charge to increase asbestos and environmental reserves and (ii) higher than expected claim frequency and severity in the Singapore branch and aviation operations (within the Property and transportation sub-segment).

In December 2017, the Neon Lloyd’s syndicate entered into a reinsurance to close transaction for the 2015 and prior years of account, which settled in early 2018.

A reconciliation of incurred and paid claims development information to the aggregate carrying amount of the liability for unpaid losses and LAE, with separate disclosure of reinsurance recoverables on unpaid claims is shown below (in millions):
2020
Unpaid losses and allocated LAE, net of reinsurance:
Specialty
Property and transportation$1,196 
Specialty casualty4,302 
Specialty financial247 
Other specialty377 
Total Specialty (excluding foreign reserves)6,122 
Other reserves
Reserves for foreign operations314 
A&E reserves422 
Unallocated LAE361 
Other56 
Total other reserves1,153 
Total reserves, net of reinsurance7,275 
Add back reinsurance recoverables, net of allowance3,117 
Gross unpaid losses and LAE included in the balance sheet$10,392 
The following claims development tables and associated disclosures related to short-duration insurance contracts are prepared by sub-segment within the property and casualty insurance business for the most recent 10 accident years. AFG determines its claim counts at the claimant or policy feature level depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the underlying claim. While the methodology is generally consistent within each sub-segment, there are minor differences between and within the sub-segments. The methods used to summarize claim counts have not changed significantly over the time periods reported in the tables below.
Property and transportation
(Dollars in Millions)
Incurred Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of ReinsuranceAs of December 31, 2020
For the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)Total IBNR Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims
Accident Year2011201220132014201520162017201820192020
2011$811 $799 $813 $827 $837 $850 $846 $844 $843 $843 $138,334 
2012864 857 871 883 894 890 886 881 879 143,151 
2013882 870 872 878 878 877 873 871 138,925 
2014844 828 817 820 815 808 804 133,182 
2015818 784 779 777 777 772 15 134,875 
2016746 716 714 706 694 25 121,116 
2017889 847 843 823 39 140,549 
2018932 902 886 69 129,891 
20191,111 1,058 125 152,304 
20201,043 349 109,446 
Total$8,673 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of Reinsurance
Accident YearFor the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020% (a)
2011$365 $667 $727 $771 $803 $821 $829 $833 $834 $835 99.1 %
2012572 708 772 816 842 856 882 869 872 99.2 %
2013438 702 760 804 831 847 858 860 98.7 %
2014329 632 693 744 770 783 789 98.1 %
2015359 582 667 707 736 744 96.4 %
2016294 521 577 618 640 92.2 %
2017379 640 696 735 89.3 %
2018396 676 738 83.3 %
2019527 823 77.8 %
2020461 44.2 %
Total$7,497 
Unpaid losses and LAE — years 2011 through 20201,176 
Unpaid losses and LAE — 11th year and prior (excluding unallocated LAE)20 
Unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance (excluding unallocated LAE)$1,196 
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Annual47.3 %30.2 %7.7 %5.3 %3.3 %1.6 %1.5 %(0.3 %)0.2 %0.1 %
Cumulative47.3 %77.5 %85.2 %90.5 %93.8 %95.4 %96.9 %96.6 %96.8 %96.9 %
(a)Represents the cumulative percentage paid of incurred claims and allocated LAE (net of reinsurance, as estimated at December 31, 2020).
Specialty casualty
(Dollars in Millions)
Incurred Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of ReinsuranceAs of December 31, 2020
For the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)Total IBNR Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims
Accident Year2011201220132014201520162017201820192020
2011$852 $849 $839 $848 $834 $828 $826 $817 $810 $808 $29 54,961 
2012901 892 885 885 883 877 849 842 833 35 54,752 
2013968 949 945 940 945 926 916 905 53 55,063 
20141,035 1,008 1,008 1,006 982 967 952 71 56,669 
20151,081 1,043 1,041 1,042 1,024 1,021 99 57,745 
20161,131 1,122 1,116 1,101 1,090 164 56,169 
20171,211 1,221 1,204 1,189 275 56,558 
20181,277 1,307 1,302 416 58,079 
20191,308 1,311 571 56,950 
20201,352 844 48,294 
Total$10,763 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of Reinsurance
Accident YearFor the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020% (a)
2011$174 $383 $522 $612 $662 $694 $714 $731 $745 $755 93.4 %
2012173 385 516 621 684 723 745 761 775 93.0 %
2013182 396 554 666 729 766 797 820 90.6 %
2014190 412 574 680 755 801 829 87.1 %
2015178 411 577 702 792 844 82.7 %
2016186 418 584 713 806 73.9 %
2017200 422 612 755 63.5 %
2018210 475 649 49.8 %
2019212 455 34.7 %
2020188 13.9 %
Total$6,876 
Unpaid losses and LAE — years 2011 through 20203,887 
Unpaid losses and LAE — 11th year and prior (excluding unallocated LAE)415 
Unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance (excluding unallocated LAE)$4,302 
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Annual18.0 %22.2 %16.0 %11.9 %7.7 %4.5 %2.9 %2.2 %1.7 %1.2 %
Cumulative18.0 %40.2 %56.2 %68.1 %75.8 %80.3 %83.2 %85.4 %87.1 %88.3 %
(a)Represents the cumulative percentage paid of incurred claims and allocated LAE (net of reinsurance, as estimated at December 31, 2020).
Specialty financial
(Dollars in Millions)
Incurred Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of ReinsuranceAs of December 31, 2020
For the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)Total IBNR Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims
Accident Year2011201220132014201520162017201820192020
2011$138 $157 $155 $153 $147 $144 $143 $139 $137 $137 $— 16,371 
2012163 163 151 139 137 135 132 127 126 21,092 
2013140 145 137 131 127 126 122 122 28,475 
2014146 157 156 153 147 142 137 29,458 
2015156 160 158 153 145 138 37,615 
2016179 184 187 182 174 45,125 
2017212 215 212 208 15 48,692 
2018212 217 219 27 46,487 
2019194 198 37 41,175 
2020231 115 24,479 
Total$1,690 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of Reinsurance
Accident YearFor the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020% (a)
2011$58 $111 $115 $123 $130 $131 $131 $132 $132 $133 97.1 %
201271 104 109 117 121 126 128 126 125 99.2 %
201370 100 107 113 117 117 118 118 96.7 %
201462 109 125 128 137 139 141 102.9 %
201572 110 129 133 132 134 97.1 %
201688 141 158 161 163 93.7 %
2017120 169 186 194 93.3 %
2018112 163 187 85.4 %
201999 146 73.7 %
2020100 43.3 %
Total$1,441 
Unpaid losses and LAE — years 2011 through 2020249 
Unpaid losses and LAE — 11th year and prior (excluding unallocated LAE)(2)
Unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance (excluding unallocated LAE)$247 
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Annual50.6 %28.0 %8.4 %4.0 %3.1 %1.5 %1.0 %(0.3 %)(0.4 %)0.7 %
Cumulative50.6 %78.6 %87.0 %91.0 %94.1 %95.6 %96.6 %96.3 %95.9 %96.6 %
(a)Represents the cumulative percentage paid of incurred claims and allocated LAE (net of reinsurance, as estimated at December 31, 2020).
Other specialty
(Dollars in Millions)
Incurred Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of ReinsuranceAs of December 31, 2020
For the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)Total IBNR Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims (a)
Accident Year2011201220132014201520162017201820192020
2011$39 $43 $42 $43 $43 $44 $44 $43 $42 $41 $— 
201242 40 39 40 41 39 39 36 37 — 
201346 47 46 47 50 53 58 58 — 
201458 57 59 59 60 61 64 — 
201559 60 63 66 76 82 — 
201661 61 65 71 76 16 — 
201763 65 70 81 13 — 
201886 90 92 40 — 
2019108 107 64 — 
2020122 102 — 
Total$760 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of Reinsurance
Accident YearFor the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020% (b)
2011$12 $20 $25 $28 $34 $36 $37 $38 $39 $39 95.1 %
201217 21 25 28 30 30 32 33 89.2 %
201316 22 34 37 44 51 53 91.4 %
201413 21 30 36 43 50 53 82.8 %
201510 26 31 50 62 69 84.1 %
201619 31 47 53 69.7 %
201710 19 30 52 64.2 %
201812 23 32 34.8 %
201924 22.4 %
20207.4 %
Total$417 
Unpaid losses and LAE — years 2011 through 2020343 
Unpaid losses and LAE — 11th year and prior (excluding unallocated LAE)34 
Unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance (excluding unallocated LAE)$377 
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Annual14.8 %15.7 %11.6 %17.1 %10.2 %8.4 %4.8 %3.8 %2.6 %— %
Cumulative14.8 %30.5 %42.1 %59.2 %69.4 %77.8 %82.6 %86.4 %89.0 %89.0 %
(a)The amounts shown in Other specialty represent business assumed by AFG’s internal reinsurance program from the operations that make up AFG’s other Specialty property and casualty insurance sub-segments. Accordingly, the liability for incurred claims and allocated LAE represents additional reserves held on claims counted in the tables provided for the other sub-segments (above).
(b)Represents the cumulative percentage paid of incurred claims and allocated LAE (net of reinsurance, as estimated at December 31, 2020).
Total Specialty Group
(Dollars in Millions)
Incurred Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of ReinsuranceAs of December 31, 2020
For the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)Total IBNR Plus Expected Development on Reported ClaimsCumulative Number of Reported Claims
Accident Year2011201220132014201520162017201820192020
2011$1,840 $1,848 $1,849 $1,871 $1,861 $1,866 $1,859 $1,843 $1,832 $1,829 $35 209,666 
20121,970 1,952 1,946 1,947 1,955 1,941 1,906 1,886 1,875 43 218,995 
20132,036 2,011 2,000 1,996 2,000 1,982 1,969 1,956 65 222,463 
20142,083 2,050 2,040 2,038 2,004 1,978 1,957 88 219,309 
20152,114 2,047 2,041 2,038 2,022 2,013 125 230,235 
20162,117 2,083 2,082 2,060 2,034 213 222,410 
20172,375 2,348 2,329 2,301 342 245,799 
20182,507 2,516 2,499 552 234,457 
20192,721 2,674 797 250,429 
20202,748 1,410 182,219 
Total$21,886 
Cumulative Paid Claims and Allocated LAE, Net of Reinsurance
Accident YearFor the Years Ended (2011–2019 is Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020% (a)
2011$609 $1,181 $1,389 $1,534 $1,629 $1,682 $1,711 $1,734 $1,750 $1,762 96.3 %
2012824 1,214 1,418 1,579 1,675 1,735 1,785 1,788 1,805 96.3 %
2013697 1,214 1,443 1,617 1,714 1,774 1,824 1,851 94.6 %
2014594 1,174 1,422 1,588 1,705 1,773 1,812 92.6 %
2015619 1,129 1,404 1,592 1,722 1,791 89.0 %
2016577 1,099 1,350 1,539 1,662 81.7 %
2017709 1,250 1,524 1,736 75.4 %
2018730 1,337 1,606 64.3 %
2019847 1,448 54.2 %
2020758 27.6 %
Total$16,231 
Unpaid losses and LAE — years 2011 through 20205,655 
Unpaid losses and LAE — 11th year and prior (excluding unallocated LAE)467 
Unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance (excluding unallocated LAE)$6,122 
Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Claims by Age, Net of Reinsurance
(Supplementary Information and Unaudited)
Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9Year 10
Annual32.2 %25.5 %11.9 %8.8 %5.6 %3.2 %2.2 %0.9 %0.9 %0.7 %
Cumulative32.2 %57.7 %69.6 %78.4 %84.0 %87.2 %89.4 %90.3 %91.2 %91.9 %
(a)Represents the cumulative percentage paid of incurred claims and allocated LAE (net of reinsurance, as estimated at December 31, 2020).

Closed Block of Long-Term Care Insurance Reserves for AFG’s closed block of long-term care insurance were $52 million at December 31, 2020 and $46 million at December 31, 2019, net of reinsurance recoverables and excluding the impact of unrealized gains on securities. AFG’s remaining outstanding long-term care policies have level premiums and are guaranteed renewable. Premium rates can potentially be increased in reaction to adverse experience; however, any rate increases would require regulatory approval.

FHLB Funding Agreements   GALIC is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (“FHLB”). The FHLB makes advances and provides other banking services to member institutions. Members are required to purchase stock in the FHLB in addition to maintaining collateral deposits that back any funds advanced. GALIC’s $56 million
investment in FHLB capital stock at December 31, 2020 is included in other investments at cost. Membership in the FHLB provides the annuity operations with an additional source of liquidity. These advances further the FHLB’s mission of improving access to housing by increasing liquidity in the residential mortgage-backed securities market.

In 2020, the FHLB advanced GALIC $200 million and GALIC repaid $165 million to the FHLB. In 2019, GALIC refinanced the terms on advances totaling $610 million. At December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, GALIC had $1.13 billion and $1.10 billion, respectively, in outstanding advances from the FHLB (included in annuity benefits accumulated), bearing interest at rates ranging from 0.31% to 1.35% (average rate of 0.53% at December 31, 2020). While these advances must be repaid between 2021 and 2025 ($931 million in 2021 and $200 million in 2025), GALIC has the option to prepay all or a portion on the majority of the advances. GALIC has invested the proceeds from the advances in fixed maturity securities with similar expected lives as the advances for the purpose of earning a spread over the interest payments due to the FHLB. The advances on these agreements are collateralized by fixed maturity investments, which have a total fair value of $1.37 billion (included in available for sale fixed maturity securities) at December 31, 2020. Interest credited on the funding agreements, which is included in annuity benefits, was $11 million in 2020, $27 million in 2019 and $20 million in 2018.

Statutory Information   AFG’s U.S.-based insurance subsidiaries are required to file financial statements with state insurance regulatory authorities prepared on an accounting basis prescribed or permitted by such authorities (statutory basis). Net earnings and capital and surplus on a statutory basis for the insurance subsidiaries were as follows (in millions):
 Net EarningsCapital and Surplus
 20202019201820202019
Property and casualty companies$481 $584 $546 $3,643 $3,342 
Life (annuity) insurance companies209 34 802 2,897 2,868 

In the fourth quarter of 2018, GALIC, AFG’s primary annuity subsidiary, entered into a reinsurance treaty with Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America that transfers the risk of certain surrender activity in GALIC’s fixed-indexed annuity business. This treaty meets the statutory risk transfer rules and resulted in increases in statutory surplus (through an after-tax reserve credit) of $139 million at December 31, 2020 and $124 million at December 31, 2019, which is reflected in the life insurance companies capital and surplus in the table above. Under GAAP, this transaction does not meet the GAAP insurance risk transfer criteria and did not have a material impact on AFG’s financial statements.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (“NAIC”) model law for risk-based capital (“RBC”) applies to both life and property and casualty insurance companies. RBC formulas determine the amount of capital that an insurance company needs so that it has an acceptable expectation of not becoming financially impaired. Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are subject to regulatory action. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the capital ratios of all AFG insurance companies substantially exceeded the RBC requirements. AFG’s insurance companies did not use any prescribed or permitted statutory accounting practices that differed from the NAIC statutory accounting practices at December 31, 2020 or 2019.

Payments of dividends by AFG’s insurance companies are subject to various state laws that limit the amount of dividends that can be paid. Under applicable restrictions, the maximum amount of dividends available to AFG in 2021 from its insurance subsidiaries without seeking regulatory approval is $705 million. Additional amounts of dividends require regulatory approval.

Holding Company Dividends   AFG declared and paid common stock dividends to shareholders totaling $336 million, $446 million and $397 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Currently, there are no regulatory restrictions on AFG’s retained earnings or net earnings that materially impact its ability to pay dividends. Based on shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2020, AFG could pay dividends of approximately $2.0 billion without violating its most restrictive debt covenant. However, the payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of AFG’s Board of Directors and will be dependent on many factors including AFG’s financial condition and results of operations, the capital requirements of its insurance subsidiaries, and rating agency commitments.
Reinsurance   In the normal course of business, AFG’s insurance subsidiaries cede reinsurance to other companies to diversify risk and limit maximum loss arising from large claims. However, AFG remains liable to its insureds regardless of whether a reinsurer is able to meet its obligations. The following table shows (in millions) (i) amounts deducted from property and casualty written and earned premiums in connection with reinsurance ceded, (ii) written and earned premiums included in income for reinsurance assumed and (iii) reinsurance recoveries, which represent ceded losses and loss adjustment expenses.
202020192018
Direct premiums written$6,862 $7,044 $6,626 
Reinsurance assumed225 255 214 
Reinsurance ceded(2,074)(1,957)(1,817)
Net written premiums$5,013 $5,342 $5,023 
Direct premiums earned$6,846 $6,848 $6,472 
Reinsurance assumed237 226 204 
Reinsurance ceded(1,984)(1,889)(1,811)
Net earned premiums$5,099 $5,185 $4,865 
Reinsurance recoveries$1,522 $1,404 $1,249 

In June 2017, AFG’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries entered into a reinsurance agreement to obtain supplemental catastrophe protection through a catastrophe bond structure with Riverfront Re Ltd. (“Riverfront”). The reinsurance agreement provided supplemental reinsurance coverage up to 95% of $200 million (fully collateralized) for catastrophe losses in excess of $109 million of traditional catastrophe reinsurance (per occurrence and annual aggregate) occurring until January 15, 2021. In connection with the reinsurance agreement, Riverfront issued notes to unrelated investors for the full amount of coverage provided under the reinsurance agreement. Through December 31, 2020, AFG’s incurred catastrophe losses have not reached the level of attachment for the catastrophe bond structure. Riverfront is a variable interest entity in which AFG does not have a variable interest because the variability in Riverfront’s results will be absorbed entirely by the investors in Riverfront. Accordingly, Riverfront is not consolidated in AFG’s financial statements and the reinsurance agreement is accounted for as ceded reinsurance. AFG’s cost for this coverage is approximately $11 million per year. In July 2020, AFG purchased an additional $50 million of reinsurance coverage for losses in excess of $100 million. Recoveries from the catastrophe bond apply before calculating losses recoverable from this catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance.

In February 2020, GALIC entered into a flow reinsurance agreement with Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company (“Commonwealth”), a subsidiary of Global Atlantic Financial Group Limited. Under the terms of the agreement, GALIC cedes certain newly issued traditional fixed and indexed annuities on a quota share coinsurance basis with such quota share percentages being up to 50%. That agreement was effective for policies issued after May 6, 2020. Under reinsurance accounting guidance, this transaction will be accounted for using the deposit method.

In the fourth quarter of 2020, GALIC entered into a block reinsurance agreement with Commonwealth. Under the terms of the agreement, GALIC ceded $5.96 billion of in force traditional fixed and indexed annuities, representing approximately 15% of its in force business, and transferred related investments to Commonwealth. The transaction will be accounted for using the deposit method and the $180 million loss on the transaction was deferred and will be recognized over the expected life of the underlying annuity contracts (7-10 years). In the fourth quarter of 2020, $11 million of GALIC’s deferred loss was amortized (and included in annuity benefits expense).

Under both the flow and block reinsurance agreements, Commonwealth is required to maintain collateral in trusts in excess of amounts owed to GALIC. Under these agreements, $492 million of gross annuity receipts were ceded and there were $206 million of ceded annuity surrenders, benefits and withdrawals. GALIC received $39 million of commission and expense allowances in 2020 and annuity benefits expense was reduced by $46 million.

AFG has reinsured approximately $5.42 billion of its $8.33 billion in face amount of life insurance at December 31, 2020 compared to $6.23 billion of its $9.53 billion in face amount of life insurance at December 31, 2019. Life written premiums ceded were $19 million, $20 million and $22 million for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Reinsurance recoveries on ceded life policies were $28 million, $32 million and $38 million for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Recoverables from Reinsurers and Premiums Receivable See Note A — “Accounting Policies — Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” for a discussion of new guidance effective January 1, 2020, which impacts the accounting for expected credit losses of recoverables from reinsurers and premiums receivable. AFG reviews the allowance quarterly and makes adjustments as necessary to reflect changes in expected credit losses. Progressions of the 2020 allowance for expected credit losses are shown below (in millions):
Recoverables from ReinsurersPremiums Receivable
Property and
Casualty
Fixed & Indexed AnnuitiesOtherTotalProperty and
Casualty
Balance at January 1$18 $— $— $18 $13 
Impact of adoption of new accounting policy(11)— (6)(3)
Provision for expected credit losses— — 
Write-offs charged against the allowance— — — — (1)
Businesses disposed(1)— — (1)— 
Balance at December 31$$— $$13 $10 

Prior to the new guidance, AFG recorded net expense reductions against the allowance for uncollectible reinsurance recoverables of less than $1 million in 2019 and $2 million in 2018.

Fixed Annuities   For certain products, the liability for “annuity benefits accumulated” includes reserves for excess benefits expected to be paid on future deaths and annuitizations guaranteed withdrawal benefits and accrued persistency and premium bonuses. The liabilities included in AFG’s Balance Sheet for these benefits, excluding the impact of unrealized gains on securities, were as follows at December 31 (in millions):
20202019
Expected death and annuitization$260 $232 
Guaranteed withdrawal benefits817 625 
Accrued persistency and premium bonuses— 

Variable Annuities   At December 31, 2020, the aggregate guaranteed minimum death benefit value (assuming every variable annuity policyholder died on that date) on AFG’s variable annuity policies exceeded the fair value of the underlying variable annuities by $11 million, compared to $13 million at December 31, 2019. Death benefits paid in excess of the variable annuity account balances were less than $1 million in each of the last three years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.