XML 34 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Tables)
3 Months Ended
Nov. 30, 2017
Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Commitments



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

Open

 

Years ended November 30,

 

Locations(1)

 

2018

 

$

12,113 

 

2019

 

 

11,715 

 

2020

 

 

10,795 

 

2021

 

 

9,339 

 

2022

 

 

9,027 

 

Thereafter

 

 

113,822 

 

Total

 

$

166,811 

(2)



(1)

Operating lease obligations have been reduced by approximately $883,000 to reflect sub-lease income.  Certain obligations under leasing arrangements are collateralized by the underlying asset being leased.

(2)

Future minimum lease payments include $3.0 million of lease payment obligations for the prior leased Miami distribution center.  For the purposes of calculating the minimum lease payments, no reduction was considered for the potential sub-lease income the Company could receive during the remaining lease term.  This potential sub-lease income was considered, however, for the purposes of calculating the exit obligation of $50,000 recorded on the balance sheet as of November 30, 2017.  Projected income for any executed sub-leases would be used to reduce the amount reported as minimum lease payments.

Schedule of Variable Interest Entities Maximum Loss Exposure



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entity

 

%
Ownership

 

Initial
Investment

 

Additional
Investments

 

Net
(Loss)/Income
Inception to
Date

 

Company’s
Variable
Interest
in Entity

 

Commitment
to Future
Additional
Investments(1)

 

Company's
Maximum
Exposure
to Loss in
Entity(2)

GolfPark Plaza, S.A.

 

50 

%

 

$

4,616 

 

$

2,402 

 

$

301 

 

$

7,319 

 

$

99 

 

$

7,418 

Price Plaza Alajuela, S.A.

 

50 

%

 

 

2,193 

 

 

1,236 

 

 

33 

 

 

3,462 

 

 

785 

 

 

4,247 

Total

 

 

 

 

$

6,809 

 

$

3,638 

 

$

334 

 

$

10,781 

 

$

884 

 

$

11,665 



(1)

The parties intend to seek alternate financing for the project, which could reduce the amount of investments each party would be required to provide.  The parties may mutually agree on changes to the project, which could increase or decrease the amount of contributions each party is required to provide.

(2)

The maximum exposure is determined by adding the Company’s variable interest in the entity and any explicit or implicit arrangements that could require the Company to provide additional financial support.