Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The following table summarizes changes in the benefit obligations, the plan assets and funded status for all of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, as well as the aggregate balance sheet impact.



	Pension Plans						Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2018			2017			2018			2017
	(in millions)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year	$	4,228		$	3,758		$	165		$	177
Service cost	103			97			2			2
Interest cost	143			142			5			5
Plan participants’ contributions	2			2			5			5
Amendments	(13		)	—			—			—
Actuarial (gain) loss	(340		)	391			(11		)	(13		)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes	(27		)	22			(2		)	2
Curtailments and special termination benefits	—			2			—			—
Benefits paid	(159		)	(186		)	(14		)	(13		)
Benefit obligation at the end of the year	$	3,937		$	4,228		$	150		$	165
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year	$	3,047		$	2,721		$	67		$	60
Actual return on plan assets	(119		)	391			(3		)	8
Employer contributions	96			97			6			7
Plan participants’ contributions	2			2			5			5
Foreign currency exchange rate changes	(27		)	22			—			—
Benefits paid	(159		)	(186		)	(14		)	(13		)
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year	$	2,840		$	3,047		$	61		$	67
Unfunded status at the end of the year	$	(1,097	)	$	(1,181	)	$	(89	)	$	(98	)

Assets and (liabilities) recognized on the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
Non-current assets	$	40		$	48		$	—		$	—
Current liabilities	(8		)	(6		)	(7		)	(8		)
Non-current liabilities	(1,129		)	(1,223		)	(82		)	(90		)
	$	(1,097	)	$	(1,181	)	$	(89	)	$	(98	)

The table below summarizes the net loss and prior service cost balances at December 31, in the accumulated other comprehensive loss account, before related tax effects, for all of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans.



	Pension Plans					Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2018			2017		2018			2017
	(in millions)
Net loss (gain)	$	958		$	1,035	$	(3	)	$	(3	)
Prior service (credit) cost	(1		)	10		(25		)	(27		)
Total amount recognized	$	957		$	1,045	$	(28	)	$	(30	)

The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) for all of the Company’s pension plans was $3,614 million at December 31, 2018 and $3,831 million at December 31, 2017. The table below presents information for the pension plans with an ABO in excess of the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017.



	Pension Plans
	2018		2017
	(in millions)
Projected benefit obligation	$	3,681	$	3,875
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	3,367	$	3,490
Fair value of plan assets	$	2,547	$	2,651

The table below summarizes the weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations for the Company’s pension and postretirement plans disclosed at December 31, 2018 and 2017.



	Pension Plans						Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Benefit obligations:
Discount rate	4.43	%	⁽¹⁾	3.78	%	⁽¹⁾	4.28	%	⁽²⁾	3.59	%	⁽²⁾
Rate of compensation increase	3.50	%	⁽³⁾	3.50	%	⁽³⁾

__________________


⁽¹⁾	The weighted average discount rate assumptions used at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 4.48% and 3.81% for the U.S. based plans, respectively, and 3.88% and 3.39% for the Canadian based plans, respectively.


⁽²⁾	The weighted average discount rate assumptions used at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 4.34% and 3.63% for the U.S. based plans, respectively, and 3.81% and 3.33% for the Canadian based plans, respectively.


⁽³⁾	The weighted average rate of compensation increase assumptions were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 3.5% for both the U.S. based plans and Canadian based plans at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.



	Pension Plans									Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
	(in millions)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost ⁽¹⁾	$	103		$	97		$	94		$	2		$	2		$	2
Interest cost	143			142			135			5			5			6
Expected return on plan assets ⁽¹⁾	(223		)	(197		)	(186		)	(5		)	(4		)	(4		)
Amortization of prior service (credits) cost	(2		)	1			—			(1		)	(1		)	(2		)
Amortization of net loss (gains)	74			61			52			(3		)	(2		)	(2		)
Curtailment loss and special termination benefits ⁽²⁾	1			6			2			—			—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	96		$	110		$	97		$	(2	)	$	—		$	—

__________________

⁽¹⁾

In connection with the adoption of ASU 2017-07, the Company reclassified pension plan administrative expenses amounting to $15 million and $14 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, from the service cost component to the expected return on plan assets component of net periodic benefit cost. Including the aforementioned policy change in connection with the adoption of this standard, operating income increased by $11 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with a corresponding decrease of Interest and other income, net. The Company’s percentage assumptions for expected long-term return on plan assets, which are disclosed further below, exclude expected plan administrative expenses.


⁽²⁾	During the year ended December 31, 2017, the curtailment loss and special termination benefits charge is primarily due to a pension curtailment charge in connection with the decision to discontinue future service accruals for substantially all salaried employee defined benefit plans effective January 1, 2019.

The Company uses a spot rate approach in the measurement of the service and interest cost components of benefit cost for all of the Company's pension and postretirement benefit plans by applying specific spot rates along that yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows.

The following table summarizes the other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income for the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.



	Pension Plans									Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
	(in millions)
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):
Net (gain) loss	$	(3	)	$	200		$	179		$	(2	)	$	(17	)	$	(4	)
Prior service (cost) credit	(13		)	(4		)	15			—			—			(2		)
Amortization of net (loss) gain	(74		)	(61		)	(52		)	3			2			2
Amortization of prior service credit (cost)	2			(1		)	—			1			1			2
Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income	(88		)	134			142			2			(14		)	(2		)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)	$	8		$	244		$	239		$	—		$	(14	)	$	(2	)

The following table summarizes the amounts expected to be amortized from accumulated OCI and recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs during 2019.



	Pension Plans			Postretirement Benefit Plans			Total
	(in millions)
Net loss (gain)	$	44		$	(3	)	$	41
Prior service credit	(2		)	—			(2		)
	$	42		$	(3	)	$	39

The table below summarizes the weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.



	Pension Plans									Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
Discount rates:
Benefit obligation	3.78	%	⁽¹⁾	4.40	%	⁽¹⁾	4.67	%	⁽¹⁾	3.59	%	⁽⁴⁾	4.05	%	⁽⁴⁾	4.22	%	⁽⁴⁾
Service cost	3.84	%		4.55	%		4.83	%		3.64	%		4.21	%		4.37	%
Interest cost	3.45	%		3.84	%		3.95	%		3.07	%		3.26	%		3.26	%
Expected long-term return on plan assets	7.92	%	⁽²⁾	7.92	%	⁽²⁾	7.92	%	⁽²⁾	8.00	%		7.43	%		7.42	%
Rate of compensation increase	3.50	%	⁽³⁾	3.50	%	⁽³⁾	3.50	%	⁽³⁾

__________________


⁽¹⁾	The weighted average discount rate assumptions used for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 3.81%, 4.45% and 4.73% for the U.S. based plans and 3.39%, 3.79% and 3.93% for the Canadian based plans, respectively.


⁽²⁾	The weighted average expected long-term return on plan assets assumptions used were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 8.00% for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 for the U.S. based plans and 7.25% for the Canadian based plans for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.


⁽³⁾	The weighted average rate of compensation increase assumptions used for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 3.50% for both the U.S and Canadian based plans.


⁽⁴⁾	The weighted average discount rate assumptions used for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were comprised of separate assumptions determined by country of 3.63%, 4.11% and 4.28% for the U.S. based plans and 3.33%, 3.64% and 3.74% for the Canadian based plans, respectively.

The expected long-term return on plan assets assumption represents the average rate that the Company expects to earn over the long-term on the assets of the Company’s benefit plans, including those from dividends, interest income and capital appreciation, net of investment management expenses. The Company utilizes a third-party consultant to assist in the development of the expected long-term return on plan assets, which is based on expectations regarding future long-term rates of return for the plans’ investment portfolio, with consideration given to the allocation of investments by asset class and historical rates of return for each individual asset class. The Company utilizes a building block methodology that utilizes historical and forward looking rates of return for each asset class and takes into account expected returns above inflation and risk premium. These long-term rates of return are then applied to the target portfolio allocations that are generally aligned with the actual asset allocations of the Company’s plans to develop the expected long-term rate of return.

The annual increase in cost of benefits (health care cost trend rate) for the Company’s U.S. based plans covering retirees under 65 years of age is assumed to be an average of 6.75% in 2019 and is assumed to gradually decrease to a rate of 4.5% in 2028 and thereafter. The health care cost trend rate for the Company’s U.S. based plans covering retirees over 65 years of age is assumed to be an average of 7.75% in 2019 and is assumed to gradually decrease to a rate of 4.5% in 2032 and thereafter. The health care cost trend rate for the Company’s Canadian based plans is assumed to be an average of 7.0% in 2019 and is assumed to stay flat for four years and reduce to 5.0% for ten years thereafter. Health care cost trend assumptions are based on (1) observed or expected short term rates of increase for different types of health models based on actual claims experience and benchmarking, and (2) a reasonable estimate of an appropriate, sustainable level of health care cost trend in the future, weighting the factors that primarily influence trends, which are price inflation and cost leveraging benefit plan features. Assumed health care cost trend rates can have a significant effect on amounts reported for postretirement medical benefit plans. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:



	1 percentage point
	Increase		Decrease
	(in millions)
Effect on total service and interest cost	$	—	$	—
Effect on postretirement benefit obligations	$	4	$	(4	)

Plan Assets. The Company’s Benefit Plan Committee (Committee) has the responsibility to formulate the investment policies and strategies for the plans’ assets. The Committee structures the investment of plan assets to achieve the following goals: (1) maximize the plans’ long-term rate of return on assets for an acceptable level of risk; and (2) limit the volatility of investment returns and consequent impact on the plans’ assets. In the pursuit of these goals, the Committee has formulated the following investment policies and objectives: (1) invest assets of the plans in a manner consistent with the fiduciary standards of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA); (2) preserve the plans’ assets; (3) maintain sufficient liquidity to fund benefit payments and pay plan expenses; (4) evaluate the performance of investment managers; and (5) achieve, on average, a minimum total rate of return equal to the established benchmarks for each asset category.

The Committee retains a professional investment consultant to advise the Committee and help ensure that the above policies and strategies are met. The Committee does not actively manage the day to day operations and selection process of individual securities and investments, as it retains the professional services of qualified investment management organizations to fulfill those tasks. Qualified investment management organizations are evaluated on several criteria for selection, with a focus on the investment management organizations’ demonstrated capability to achieve results that will meet or exceed the investment objectives they have been assigned and conform to the policies established by the Committee. While the investment management organizations have investment discretion over the assets placed under their management, the Committee provides each investment manager with specific investment guidelines relevant to its asset class.

The Committee has established the allowable range that the plans’ assets may be invested in for each major asset category. In addition, the Committee has established guidelines regarding diversification within asset categories to limit risk and exposure to a single or limited number of securities. The investments of the plans’ include a diversified portfolio of both equity and fixed income investments. Equity investments are further diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, small to large capitalization stocks, and growth and value stocks. Fixed income assets are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. issuers, corporate and governmental issuers, and credit quality. The plan also invests in real estate through publicly traded real estate securities. Derivatives may be used only for hedging purposes or to create synthetic long positions. The plans are prohibited from directly owning commodities, unregistered securities, restricted stock, private placements, or interests in oil, gas, mineral exploration, or other development programs. Further, short selling or utilizing margin buying for investment purposes is prohibited.

The table below presents the allowable range for each major category of the plans’ assets at December 31, 2018 and the Company’s pension plan and postretirement benefit plan weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2018 and 2017, by asset category.



	U.S.					Canada
Asset Category	Range	2018		2017		Range	2018		2017
Domestic equity⁽¹⁾	30%-60%	47	%	47	%	—%	13	%	15	%
International equity⁽²⁾	10%-20%	10		11		—	52		47
Total equities	45%-75%	57		58		40%-80%	65		62
Fixed income securities	20%-40%	30		28		—	28		25
Other, primarily cash and cash equivalents	0%-15%	6		7		—	7		13
Total fixed income securities and cash and cash equivalents	NA	NA		NA		20%-60%	35		38
Real estate securities	0%-15%	7		7		—	—		—
Total		100	%	100	%		100	%	100	%

__________________


⁽¹⁾	Domestic equities for Canadian plans refers to equities of Canadian companies.


⁽²⁾	International equities for Canadian plans includes equities of U.S. companies.

NA - Not applicable. The Company’s Master Pension Trust Investment Policy does not provide an allocation percentage range to fixed income securities and cash and cash equivalents.

The Committee regularly monitors the investment of the plans’ assets to ensure that the actual investment allocation remains within the established range. The Committee also regularly measures and monitors investment risk through ongoing performance reporting and investment manager reviews. Investment manager reviews include assessing the managers’ performance versus the appropriate benchmark index both in the short and long-term period, performance versus peers, and an examination of the risk the managers assumed in order to achieve rates of return.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s pension plans’ assets by asset category segregated by level within the fair value hierarchy, as described below.



	U.S. Pension Plans’ Assets									Canadian Pension Plans’ Assets
	Fair Value Measured At December 31, 2018									Fair Value Measured At December 31, 2018
Asset Category	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in millions)
Equity securities⁽¹⁾:
U.S. Equity	$	1,205	$	—	$	—	$	1,205		$	64	$	—	$	—	$	64
International Equity	90		—		—		90			95		—		—		95
Fixed Income — Investment Grade⁽²⁾	313		160		—		473			—		—		—		—
Fixed Income — High Yield⁽³⁾	—		271		—		271			—		—		—		—
Real Estate Investment Trusts⁽⁴⁾	185		—		—		185			—		—		—		—
Other⁽⁵⁾	—		146		—		146			4		16		—		20
Total assets at fair value	$	1,793	$	577	$	—	$	2,370		$	163	$	16	$	—	$	179
Liabilities for unsettled trades, net							(9		)							—
Other investments measured at net asset value⁽⁶⁾⁽⁷⁾							176									124
Total							$	2,537								$	303



	U.S. Pension Plans’ Assets									Canadian Pension Plans’ Assets
	Fair Value Measured At December 31, 2017									Fair Value Measured At December 31, 2017
Asset Category	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in millions)
Equity securities⁽¹⁾:
U.S. Equity	$	1,297	$	—	$	—	$	1,297		$	71	$	—	$	—	$	71
International Equity	87		—		—		87			105		—		—		105
Fixed Income — Investment Grade⁽²⁾	329		205		—		534			—		—		—		—
Fixed Income — High Yield⁽³⁾	—		219		—		219			—		—		—		—
Real Estate Investment Trusts⁽⁴⁾	196		—		—		196			—		—		—		—
Other⁽⁵⁾	—		198		—		198			8		37		—		45
Total assets at fair value	$	1,909	$	622	$	—	$	2,531		$	184	$	37	$	—	$	221
Liabilities for unsettled trades, net							(30		)							—
Other investments measured at net asset value⁽⁶⁾⁽⁷⁾							203									122
Total							$	2,704								$	343

__________________


⁽¹⁾	Equity securities consist of investments in common stock of U.S. and international companies. The fair value of equity securities is based on quoted market prices available in active markets at the close of a trading day, primarily the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ), and various international exchanges.

⁽²⁾

Approximately 66% and 62% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of U.S. plan assets that are invested in the Fixed Income — Investment Grade asset category consist of a mutual fund offered by a registered investment company (the Fund) and fixed income securities. The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities, mortgaged-backed securities, U.S. treasury and agency bonds and corporate bonds. These investments are classified by the Company as a Level 1 measurement within the fair value hierarchy, as the mutual fund trades on an active market and daily, quoted prices are available. The remaining 34% and 38% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of U.S. plan assets are fixed income securities, primarily investment grade corporate bonds from various industries held directly by the plan. The fair values of these investments are based on yields currently available on comparable bonds of issuers with similar credit ratings, quoted prices of similar bonds in an active market, or cash flows based on observable inputs and are classified as Level 2.


⁽³⁾	Fixed Income — High Yield consists of investments in corporate high-yield bonds from various industries. The fair values of these investments are based on yields currently available on comparable bonds of issuers with similar credit ratings, quoted prices of similar bonds in an active market, or cash flows based on observable inputs.


⁽⁴⁾	Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) consist of securities that trade on the major exchanges and invest directly in real estate, either through properties or mortgages.


⁽⁵⁾	Other consists primarily of: (1) money market accounts, which invest primarily in short-term, high quality money market securities such as government obligations, commercial paper, time deposits and certificates of deposit, and are classified as Level 2, and (2) cash, which is classified as Level 1.


⁽⁶⁾	In accordance with ASU 2015-07, certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value (NAV) per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statements of financial position.

⁽⁷⁾

All of the U.S. plans other investments measured using NAV at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and approximately 30% and 31% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of the Canadian plans other investments measured using NAV consist of a regulated commingled equity trust fund, for which fair value is based on the NAV at the end of each month. The NAV is calculated by the fund manager based on the fair value of the fund’s holdings, primarily equity securities traded in active markets, determined as of the end of each month as a practical expedient to estimating fair value. This practical expedient is not used when it is determined to be probable that the fund will sell the investment for an amount different than the reported NAV. Withdrawals are permitted, with notice by the 20th day of each month, based on NAV. Approximately 70% and 69% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of the Canadian plans other investments measured using NAV are invested in regulated commingled bond funds (the “Bond Funds”). As these Bond Funds do not trade in an active market, the fair value is based on NAVs calculated by fund managers based on yields currently available on comparable bonds of issuers with similar credit ratings, quoted prices of similar bonds in an active market, or cash flows based on observable inputs as a practical expedient to estimating fair value and classified as Level 2. Withdrawals are permitted monthly, with notice between 0 and 3 days of the transaction date, based on NAV.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s postretirement benefit plans’ assets by asset category segregated by level within the fair value hierarchy, as described below.



	Postretirement Benefit Plans’ Assets
	Fair Value Measured At December 31, 2018								Fair Value Measured At December 31, 2017
Asset Category	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in millions)
Equity securities⁽¹⁾:
U.S. Equity	$	35	$	—	$	—	$	35	$	38	$	—	$	—	$	38
International Equity	1		—		—		1		2		—		—		2
Fixed Income — Investment Grade⁽²⁾	9		2		—		11		10		3		—		13
Fixed Income — High Yield⁽³⁾	—		4		—		4		—		3		—		3
Real Estate Investment Trusts⁽⁴⁾	3		—		—		3		3		—		—		3
Other⁽⁵⁾	—		4		—		4		—		5		—		5
Total assets at fair value	$	48	$	10	$	—	$	58	$	53	$	11	$	—	$	64
Other investments measured at net asset value⁽⁶⁾⁽⁷⁾							3								3
Total							$	61							$	67

__________________


⁽¹⁾	Equity securities consist of investments in common stock of U.S. and international companies. The fair value of equity securities is based on quoted market prices available in active markets at the close of a trading day, primarily the NYSE, NASDAQ, and various international exchanges.

⁽²⁾

Approximately 82% and 77% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of the postretirement benefit plan assets that are invested in the Fixed Income — Investment Grade asset category consist of the Fund and fixed income securities. The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities, mortgaged-backed securities, U.S. treasury and agency bonds and corporate bonds. These investments are classified by the Company as a Level 1 measurement within the fair value hierarchy as the mutual fund trades on an active market and daily, quoted prices are available. The remaining 18% and 23% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of the postretirement benefit plan assets are fixed income securities, primarily investment grade corporate bonds from various industries held directly by the plan. The fair values of these investments are based on yields currently available on comparable bonds of issuers with similar credit ratings, quoted prices of similar bonds in an active market, or cash flows based on observable inputs and are classified as Level 2.


⁽³⁾	Fixed Income — High Yield consists of investments in corporate high-yield bonds from various industries. The fair values of these investments are based on yields currently available on comparable bonds of issuers with similar credit ratings, quoted prices of similar bonds in an active market, or cash flows based on observable inputs.


⁽⁴⁾	REITs consist of securities that trade on the major exchanges and invest directly, either through properties or mortgages.


⁽⁵⁾	Other consists primarily of money market accounts, which invest primarily in short-term, high quality money market securities such as government obligations, commercial paper, time deposits and certificates of deposit.


⁽⁶⁾	In accordance with ASU 2015-07, certain investments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statements of financial position.

⁽⁷⁾

All of the postretirement benefit plans other investments measured using NAV at December 31, 2018 and 2017 consist of a regulated commingled equity trust fund, which fair value is based on NAV at the end of each month. The NAV is calculated by the fund manager based on the fair value of the fund’s holdings, primarily equity securities traded in active markets, determined as of the end of each month as a practical expedient to estimating fair value. This practical expedient is not used when it is determined to be probable that the fund will sell the investment for an amount different than the reported NAV. Withdrawals are permitted, with notice by the 20th day of each month, based on NAV.

Contributions. The funding policy for the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans is to contribute at least the minimum required by applicable laws and regulations or to directly make benefit payments where appropriate. The Company makes voluntary, additional contributions to the pension plans depending on a number of factors, including operating cash flow levels, alternative uses for excess cash and the plans’ funded status. At December 31, 2018, all legal funding requirements had been met. For the year ending December 31, 2019, the Company currently expects to contribute approximately $80 million to its pension plans, and approximately $8 million to its postretirement benefit plans.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments. The following table presents expected pension and postretirement benefit payments and expected postretirement subsidies due to the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate.



			Postretirement Benefits
	Pension Benefits		Benefit Payments		Subsidy Receipts
	(in millions)
2019	$	168	$	12	$	—
2020	176		12		—
2021	184		12		—
2022	194		12		—
2023	201		12		—
Years 2024 - 2028	1,150		53		1

Employee Savings Plans. Under its various employee savings plans, the Company matches the contributions of participating employees up to a designated level. The extent of the match, vesting terms and the form of the matching contributions vary among the plans. Under these plans, the Company’s matching contributions in L3’s common stock and cash were $118 million for 2018, $115 million for 2017 and $118 million for 2016. These matching contributions include amounts attributable to discontinued operations of $2 million for 2018, $8 million for 2017 and $12 million for 2016.

Multiemployer Benefit Plans. Certain of the Company’s businesses participate in multiemployer defined benefit pension plans. The Company makes cash contributions to these plans under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover its union employees based on a fixed rate per hour of service worked by the covered employees. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects: (1) assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers, (2) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers and (3) if the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its multiemployer plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability. In connection with the sale of the Vertex Aerospace business, the Company no longer participates in the majority of its multiemployer plans. Under the Company's remaining multiemployer plans, cash contributed and expenses recorded for the year ended December 31, 2018 were less than $1 million.