Business Condition and Liquidity	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Business Condition and Liquidity	NOTE 2 – BUSINESS CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY The Company has a history of recurring losses with an accumulated deficit of $118,242,224 at December 31, 2014, and a net loss of $1,545,077 for the year then ended. The Company’s working capital, which includes inventory that will not be sold for up to three years, has decreased by $714,800 from the prior year. The Company has provided cash flows from operations of $339,808. During 2014, the Company sought to improve future cash flows from operating activities through improving operating cost control measures, obtaining additional quality certifications to permit expanded sales of products, and raising capital. The Company’s net loss was $1,545,077 in 2014, compared to a net loss of $2,461,845 in 2013. This is a decrease of $916,768, or approximately 37%. The Company has made significant investments in the design, planning and construction of a large scale uranium de-conversion and fluorine extraction facility, a project the Company started in 2004. Since beginning its efforts to design and build this proposed de-conversion facility, the Company acquired seven patents for the Fluorine Extraction Process (“FEP”) and later designed, built, and operated an FEP pilot plant to produce a fluoride gas from de-conversion of uranium tetrafluoride. At the completion of testing in 2013, the pilot plant was shut down. In October 2012, the Company obtained a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) construction and operating license for the planned de-conversion facility which is a forty (40) year operating license and is the first commercial license of this type issued in the U.S. There are no other companies with a similar license application under review by the NRC. Therefore, the NRC license represents a significant competitive barrier and the Company believes that it provides it with a very valuable asset. Since the start of this project there have been several changes in the nuclear industry that have caused the Company to place this de-conversion project on hold. When the Company began pursuing this project there were three companies planning for construction of new commercial uranium enrichment plants in the U.S. and a fourth company using the Silex laser separation technology for enrichment. The Company was communicating with all of these companies for possible de-conversion agreements to process their tails and was successful in obtaining a de-conversion service agreement with URENCO USA (UUSA) that would use approximately 50% of the installed processing capacity of its proposed de-conversion facility. While the agreement with UUSA remains in place the milestone dates in the agreement for the Company to have an operating de-conversion facility have passed. UUSA has not indicated they intend to terminate the agreement at this time. Instead UUSA and the Company plan to revise the agreement milestone dates at a future time once the Company has a firmer idea of the schedule for resumption of engineering and construction of the project. Plans to obtain additional contracts with the other enrichment companies in order to commit 100% of the planned facility’s capacity have been delayed because of the slowdown in nuclear industry growth. Having contracts in place for the full plant capacity is necessary for the Company to obtain financing for the project and it believes that one or more of these companies are likely to resume construction plans on a new enrichment facility within the next few years. When these plans do resume, the Company will once again begin contract talks to commit the remaining capacity for its planned de-conversion facility and continue efforts to obtain project financing to proceed with the design and construction of the facility. It is also expected that the Company will be able to revise its contract dates with UUSA once one of these other enrichment companies resumes construction planning. Therefore, in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company placed most of the work on that project on hold until additional contracts for de-conversion service could be secured and financing obtained for the project. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred costs of approximately $419,000 to maintain licenses and other necessary project investments. During the same period in 2013, the Company incurred costs of approximately $820,000 for planning and development activities on the project. In the meantime, the Company has renewed its focus upon its long-standing core business segments and is working to reduce operating costs as well as create new business opportunities within those segments. The results of these efforts have led to positive cash flow produced by operating activities for 2014. While there can be no assurances that this positive cash flow from operations will continue the Company will continue to work towards that goal and in achieving profitability based upon the performance of our current business segments. The Company believes there are significant future opportunities for growth within the radiochemical, cobalt products, and field services segments and will be exploring those opportunities to expand business and revenue within those segments. The Company will make public announcements of those developments as agreements are put in place to secure those opportunities. On October 2, 2014, the Company entered into a ten year agreement with the DOE for the irradiation of cobalt targets for the production of cobalt-60. The agreement stipulates that the Company will be able to purchase cobalt targets at a fixed price per target with an annual 5% escalation in price.

Business Condition and Liquidity

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2014

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

NOTE 2 – BUSINESS CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

The Company has a history of recurring losses with an accumulated deficit of $118,242,224 at December 31, 2014, and a net loss of $1,545,077 for the year then ended. The Company’s working capital, which includes inventory that will not be sold for up to three years, has decreased by $714,800 from the prior year. The Company has provided cash flows from operations of $339,808. During 2014, the Company sought to improve future cash flows from operating activities through improving operating cost control measures, obtaining additional quality certifications to permit expanded sales of products, and raising capital. The Company’s net loss was $1,545,077 in 2014, compared to a net loss of $2,461,845 in 2013. This is a decrease of $916,768, or approximately 37%.

The Company has made significant investments in the design, planning and construction of a large scale uranium de-conversion and fluorine extraction facility, a project the Company started in 2004. Since beginning its efforts to design and build this proposed de-conversion facility, the Company acquired seven patents for the Fluorine Extraction Process (“FEP”) and later designed, built, and operated an FEP pilot plant to produce a fluoride gas from de-conversion of uranium tetrafluoride. At the completion of testing in 2013, the pilot plant was shut down. In October 2012, the Company obtained a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) construction and operating license for the planned de-conversion facility which is a forty (40) year operating license and is the first commercial license of this type issued in the U.S. There are no other companies with a similar license application under review by the NRC. Therefore, the NRC license represents a significant competitive barrier and the Company believes that it provides it with a very valuable asset.

Since the start of this project there have been several changes in the nuclear industry that have caused the Company to place this de-conversion project on hold. When the Company began pursuing this project there were three companies planning for construction of new commercial uranium enrichment plants in the U.S. and a fourth company using the Silex laser separation technology for enrichment. The Company was communicating with all of these companies for possible de-conversion agreements to process their tails and was successful in obtaining a de-conversion service agreement with URENCO USA (UUSA) that would use approximately 50% of the installed processing capacity of its proposed de-conversion facility. While the agreement with UUSA remains in place the milestone dates in the agreement for the Company to have an operating de-conversion facility have passed. UUSA has not indicated they intend to terminate the agreement at this time. Instead UUSA and the Company plan to revise the agreement milestone dates at a future time once the Company has a firmer idea of the schedule for resumption of engineering and construction of the project. Plans to obtain additional contracts with the other enrichment companies in order to commit 100% of the planned facility’s capacity have been delayed because of the slowdown in nuclear industry growth. Having contracts in place for the full plant capacity is necessary for the Company to obtain financing for the project and it believes that one or more of these companies are likely to resume construction plans on a new enrichment facility within the next few years. When these plans do resume, the Company will once again begin contract talks to commit the remaining capacity for its planned de-conversion facility and continue efforts to obtain project financing to proceed with the design and construction of the facility. It is also expected that the Company will be able to revise its contract dates with UUSA once one of these other enrichment companies resumes construction planning. Therefore, in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company placed most of the work on that project on hold until additional contracts for de-conversion service could be secured and financing obtained for the project. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred costs of approximately $419,000 to maintain licenses and other necessary project investments. During the same period in 2013, the Company incurred costs of approximately $820,000 for planning and development activities on the project.

In the meantime, the Company has renewed its focus upon its long-standing core business segments and is working to reduce operating costs as well as create new business opportunities within those segments. The results of these efforts have led to positive cash flow produced by operating activities for 2014. While there can be no assurances that this positive cash flow from operations will continue the Company will continue to work towards that goal and in achieving profitability based upon the performance of our current business segments. The Company believes there are significant future opportunities for growth within the radiochemical, cobalt products, and field services segments and will be exploring those opportunities to expand business and revenue within those segments. The Company will make public announcements of those developments as agreements are put in place to secure those opportunities.

On October 2, 2014, the Company entered into a ten year agreement with the DOE for the irradiation of cobalt targets for the production of cobalt-60. The agreement stipulates that the Company will be able to purchase cobalt targets at a fixed price per target with an annual 5% escalation in price.

- Definition

Disclosure of accounting policy for reporting when there is a substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time (generally a year from the balance sheet date). Disclose: (a) pertinent conditions and events giving rise to the assessment of substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time, (b) the possible effects of such conditions and events, (c) management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions and events and any mitigating factors, (d) possible discontinuance of operations, (e) management's plans (including relevant prospective financial information), and (f) information about the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities. If management's plans alleviate the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosure of the principal conditions and events that initially raised the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern would be expected to be considered. Disclose whether operations for the current or prior years generated sufficient cash to cover current obligations, whether waivers were obtained from creditors relating to the company's default under the provisions of debt agreements and possible effects of such conditions and events, such as: whether there is a possible need to obtain additional financing (debt or equity) or to liquidate certain holdings to offset future cash flow deficiencies. Disclose appropriate parent company information when parent is dependent upon remittances from subsidiaries to satisfy its obligations.

+ References+ Details