UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
United Microelectronics Corporation |
||||
(Translation of registrants name into English) | ||||
No. 3 Li Hsin Road II Science Park Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C. |
||||
(Address of principal executive office) |
||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F: [x] Form 20-F [ ] Form 40-F | ||||
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ] | ||||
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ] | ||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: [ ] Yes [x] No | ||||
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): n/a |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
United Microelectronics Corporation | ||
Date: 09/08/2017 | By: |
Chitung Liu |
Name: | Chitung Liu | |
Title: | CFO | |
Exhibit No. | Description | |
|
|
|
99 | 6K on 09/08/2017 | |
www.umc.com
Exhibit
Exhibit Description
99.1 | Announcement on 2017/09/08: The Company received the indictment from Taichung District Prosecutors Office |
Exhibit 99.1
The Company received the indictment from Taichung District Prosecutors Office
1. Parties to the legal matter: UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP.
2. Name of the court or disposing agency: Taichung District Prosecutors Office
3. Reference/case numbers of relevant documents: 106-Jhen-Zih-11035
4. Date of occurrence of the event: 2017/09/08
5. Background and circumstances of the matter (including the property/subject matter under
dispute): The Taichung District Prosecutors Office pressed charges against the Company based on the
allegation of violating the Trade Secret Act.
6. Course and progression of handling of the matter: Please refer to points 8 and 9.
7. Effect on company finances and business and estimated monetary amount of the effect: no material
effect
8. Countermeasures and status of amelioration:
The Company has engaged attorneys to defend this case and will submit its defenses to the court to
protect the Companys interests.
9. Any other matters that need to be specified:
The Company always puts forth its best efforts to protect trade secrets and objectively adopts
measures to avoid infringing others trade secrets in compliance with current industry practices.
Whether the standard adopted by the Taichung District Prosecutors Office in this specific case
complies with current practices remains to be examined by the court pursuant to the applicable
laws.