XML 29 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Note 13 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements
3 Months Ended
Feb. 25, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Description of New Accounting Pronouncements Not yet Adopted [Text Block]
1
3
. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In
May
2014,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2014
-
09
(ASU
2014
-
09),
which creates ASC Topic
606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic
605,
Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, ASU
2014
-
09
supersedes the cost guidance in Subtopic
605
-
35,
Revenue Recognition—Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and creates new Subtopic
340
-
40,
Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic
606
is to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. Companies are allowed to select between
two
transition methods:
(1)
a full retrospective transition method with the application of the new guidance to each prior reporting period presented, or
(2)
a retrospective transition method that recognizes the cumulative effect on prior periods at the date of adoption together with additional footnote disclosures. In addition, during
2016
the FASB has issued ASU
2016
-
08,
ASU
2016
-
10
and ASU
2016
-
12,
all of which clarify certain implementation guidance within ASU
2014
-
09,
and ASU
2016
-
11,
which rescinds certain SEC guidance within the ASC effective upon an entity’s adoption of ASU
2014
-
09.
The amendments in ASU
2014
-
09
are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December
15,
2017,
including interim periods within that reporting period, and early application is not permitted. Therefore the amendments in ASU
2014
-
09
will become effective for us as of the beginning of our
2019
fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU
2014
-
09
will have on our consolidated financial statements and have not made any decision on the method of adoption.
 
In
July
2015,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2015
-
11,
Inventory (Topic
330):
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
. ASU
2015
-
11
requires that inventory within the scope of this Update be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amendments in this Update do not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in,
first
-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using
first
-in,
first
-out (FIFO) or average cost. For all entities, the guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after
December
15,
2016.
Early adoption is permitted. Therefore the amendments in ASU
2015
-
11
will become effective for us as of the beginning of our
2018
fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.
 
In
January
2016,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016
-
01,
Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic
825
-
10):
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
. ASU
2016
-
01
requires that equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity
may
choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Furthermore, equity investments without readily determinable fair values are to be assessed for impairment using a quantitative approach. The amendments in ASU
2016
-
01
should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. The amendments in ASU
2016
-
01
will become effective for us as of the beginning of our
2019
fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.
 
In
February
2016,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016
-
02,
Leases (Topic
842)
. The guidance in ASU
2016
-
02
requires that a lessee recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of
12
months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. As with previous guidance, there continues to be a differentiation between finance leases and operating leases, however this distinction now primarily relates to differences in the manner of expense recognition over time and in the classification of lease payments in the statement of cash flows. Lease assets and liabilities arising from both finance and operating leases will be recognized in the statement of financial position. ASU
2016
-
02
leaves the accounting for leases by lessors largely unchanged from previous GAAP. The transitional guidance for adopting the requirements of ASU
2016
-
02
calls for a modified retrospective approach that includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities
may
elect to apply. The guidance in ASU
2016
-
02
will become effective for us as of the beginning of our
2020
fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU
2016
-
02
will have on our consolidated financial statements, which we expect will have a material effect on our statement of financial position, and have not made any decision on the method of adoption with respect to the optional practical expedients.
 
In
August
2016,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016
-
15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230):
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
. ASU
2016
-
15
addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice with respect to these items. Among the types of cash flows addressed are payments for costs related to debt prepayments or extinguishments, payments representing accreted interest on discounted debt, payments of contingent consideration after a business combination, proceeds from insurance claims and company-owned life insurance, and distributions from equity method investees, among others. The amendments in ASU
2016
-
15
are to be adopted retrospectively and will become effective for as at the beginning of our
2019
fiscal year. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our presentation of cash flows.
 
In
January
2017,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2017
-
01,
Business Combinations
(Topic
805
):
Clarifying the Definition of a Business
. ASU
2017
-
01
provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) does not constitute a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. If the screen is not met, the amendments in ASU
2017
-
01
(1)
require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and
(2)
remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments in ASU
2017
-
01
shall apply prospectively and will become effective for as at the beginning of our
2019
fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.
 
In
January
2017,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2017
-
04,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
(Topic
350
):
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. ASU
2017
-
04
eliminates Step
2
from the goodwill impairment test. Under Step
2,
an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
Instead, under the amendments in ASU
2017
-
04,
an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The amendments in ASU
2017
-
04
will become effective for us as of the beginning of our
2021
fiscal year.
Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after
January
1,
2017.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.
 
 
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION-CONTINUED
BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-UNAUDITED
FEBRUARY
25,
2017
(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
 
In
March
2017,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2017
-
07,
Compensation – Retirement Benefits
(Topic
715
):
Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension
Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
. Under existing GAAP, an entity is required to present all components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost aggregated as a net amount in the income statement, and this net amount
may
be capitalized as part of an asset where appropriate. The amendments in ASU
2017
-
07
require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period, and requires the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if
one
is presented. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The amendments in ASU
2017
-
07
shall be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic
postretirement benefit in assets.
Early adoption is permitted, and we have elected to adopt the amendments in ASU
2017
-
07
effective as of the beginning of our
2017
fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.