utsi-20f_20191231.htm

Date of event requiring this shell company report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 35,524,950 ordinary shares, par value US$0.00375 per share.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or (15)(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing.

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Names of certain PRC companies provided in this annual report are translated or transliterated from their original PRC legal names.

Discrepancies in any table between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

This annual report contains translations of certain Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars at the rate of RMB 6.9618 to $1.00, the noon buying rate on December 31, 2019, as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. We make no representation that the Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Conducting Business in China-Fluctuation in the value of the RMB relative to the U.S. dollar could affect our operating results and may have a material adverse effect on your investment.”

This annual report also contains translations of certain Indian Rupee amounts into U.S. dollars at the rate of INR 71.36 to $1.00, the noon buying rate on December 31, 2019, as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. We make no representation that the Indian Rupee or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Indian Rupee, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. Fluctuation in the value of the Indian Rupee may have a material adverse effect on your investment. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-Currency rate fluctuations may adversely affect our cash flow and operating results.”

This annual report also contains translations of certain Japanese Yen amounts into U.S. dollars at the rate of JPY 108.67 to $1.00, the noon buying rate on December 31, 2019, as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. We make no representation that the Japanese Yen or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Japanese Yen, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. Fluctuation in the value of the Japanese Yen may have a material adverse effect on your investment. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-Currency rate fluctuations may adversely affect our cash flow and operating results.”

Our ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ, under the symbol “UTSI”. On March 21, 2013, we effected a one-for-three reverse share split of our ordinary shares. Unless otherwise specified, all share and per share information in this annual report has been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse share split.

On June 24, 2011, we effected a merger, or the Merger, to reorganize the corporate structure of UTStarcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1991, and its subsidiaries. The Merger resulted in shares of the common stock of UTStarcom, Inc. being converted into the right to receive an equal number of ordinary shares in our capital, which were issued by us in connection with the Merger. Following the Merger, UTStarcom, Inc. became our wholly owned subsidiary and we became the parent company of UTStarcom, Inc. and its subsidiaries. See “Item 4. Information on the Company-C. Organizational Structure” for a list of our subsidiaries. We, together with our subsidiaries, continue to conduct our business in substantially the same manner as was conducted by UTStarcom, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The transaction was accounted for as a legal re-organization of entities under common control. Accordingly, we have prepared our consolidated financial statements as if the current corporate structure had been in existence throughout all relevant periods. Our consolidated financial statements prior to the Merger reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of UTStarcom, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31,

2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 reflect our financial position, results of operation and cash flows.

The following selected consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and the accompanying notes and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” below. Our consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. Our historical results do not necessarily indicate our results expected for any future periods.

Our selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this annual report.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
	(in thousands, except per share amount)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales(1)	$	65,623	$	115,944	$	98,292	$	86,512	$	117,103
Gross profit	$	24,157	$	32,268	$	33,146	$	28,356	$	27,868
Operating income (loss)	$	(6,137)	$	4,367	$	6,516	$	1,708	$	(4,989	)
Net income (loss)	$	(3,913)	$	4,820	$	6,981	$	290	$	(27,158	)
Net income (loss) per share-Basic	$	(0.11)	$	0.14	$	0.20	$	0.01	$	(0.74	)


	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	34,966	$	57,049	$	79,749	$	83,922	$	77,050
Working capital	$	88,045	$	90,362	$	78,549	$	75,850	$	63,818
Total assets	$	151,303	$	177,435	$	187,044	$	178,703	$	198,379
Total short-term debt	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Long-term debt	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total UTStarcom Holdings Corp. shareholders’ equity	$	99,188	$	102,166	$	90,992	$	82,741	$	83,777

We have a history of operating losses and may not have enough liquidity to execute our business plan or to continue our operations without obtaining additional funding or selling additional securities. We may not be able to obtain additional funding under commercially reasonable terms or issue additional securities.

We reported a net loss of $3.9 million, and net income of $4.8 million, and $7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, we had $35.0 million in cash or cash equivalents. Our management considered our current financial status, business operation, market strategy, and product development in the twelve months following the issuance date of this report and believes that we will have sufficient liquidity to finance our anticipated operations, capital expenditure requirements and new business acquisitions and investments, as well as achieve projected cash collections from customers and contain expenses and cash used in operations over that period. However, we may not achieve such operating performance and our management expects to continue to implement our liquidity plans, including reducing operating expenses and improving cash collections and receivable turnover. If we cannot successfully implement our liquidity plans, it may be necessary for us to make significant changes to our business plans and strategy to maintain adequate liquidity. In addition, various other factors may negatively impact our liquidity, such as:

Although our management has developed liquidity plans, we may have difficulty maintaining existing relationships or developing new relationships with suppliers as a result of our current financial condition. Our suppliers may choose to provide products or services to us on more stringent payment terms than those currently in place, such as requiring advance payment or payment upon delivery, which may have a negative impact on our short-term cash flows, and in turn materially and adversely affect our ability to retain current customers, attract new customers and maintain contracts that are critical to our operations.

If we cannot meet our liquidity needs through improved operating results, we may need to obtain additional financing from financial institutions or other third parties. However, we may not be able to obtain financing under commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Additionally, we may not be able to sell additional securities to meet our liquidity needs, and any such sale of securities would dilute the ownership of our shareholders.

Our strategic plan may not be successful, which may materially and adversely affect our financial results.

We have a strategic plan in place and expect that this plan in time will result in an optimized revenue profile and improve our margins. While we continue to execute and modify our plan to align with market changes, we may not be successful in reducing our costs, improving our efficiencies, or expanding our margins. If our current or future strategic plans for the business of our company are not as successful as originally anticipated, or at all, our company, financial prospects and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our cost-reduction initiatives and restructuring plans may not result in anticipated savings or more efficient operations. Our restructuring may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our operations and financial results.

In the past several years, we implemented certain cost-reduction initiatives and restructuring plans. However, our restructuring may not improve our results of operations and cash flows as we anticipated. Our inability to realize the benefits of our cost-reduction initiatives and restructuring plans may result in an ineffective business structure that could negatively affect our results of operations. In addition to severance and other employee-related costs, our restructuring plans may also subject us to litigation risks and expenses.

Our restructuring may also have other adverse consequences, such as employee attrition beyond our planned reduction in the workforce, the loss of employees with valuable knowledge or expertise, a negative effect on employee morale and gains in competitive advantages by our competitors. Our restructuring may also place increased demands on our personnel and could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain talent, develop and enhance our products and services, service our existing customers, achieve our sales and marketing objectives and perform our accounting, finance and administrative functions.

We may undertake future cost-reduction initiatives and restructuring plans that may materially and adversely impact our operations. If we do not realize the anticipated benefits of any future restructurings, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

Changes in our management may cause uncertainty in, or be disruptive to, our business. Certain of our directors and management team members have been with us in those capacities for only a short time.

We have experienced significant changes in our management and our Board of Directors, or Board, in recent years. In 2016, we appointed a new chief executive officer, a new chief operating officer and a new director to the Board. Additionally, in November 2017, one of our directors was replaced. In September 2019, two of our directors were replaced resulting from the sale of 9.2 million shares by Shah Capital Opportunity Fund and Mr. Hong Liang Lu (“Selling Shareholders”) to Tongding Interconnection Information Co., Ltd. (“TDI”). In March 2020, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) took a temporary medical leave of absence, and our Board of Directors appointed an acting CEO. In May 2020, the Vice Present of Finance will resign from the Company. Future change of shareholders may also cause further changes in our management and our Board of Directors. Although we have endeavored to implement any director and management transition in a non-disruptive manner, any such transition might impact our business, and give rise to uncertainty among our customers, investors, vendors, employees and others concerning our future direction and performance, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and our ability to execute our business model.

In addition, because certain members of our management and Board have served in their respective capacities for only limited durations, we face the additional risks that these persons:

We rely on a Japanese customer and an Indian customer for a significant portion of our net sales. Any deterioration of our relationship or any interruption to our ongoing collaboration with these customers, may significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A significant portion of our net sales is derived from a Japanese customer, SoftBank Corp. and its related entities (collectively “Softbank”), and an Indian customer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and its related entities (collectively “BSNL”).

Although we have collaborated with Softbank since 2008, Softbank may not continue working with us in the future, whether due to changes in management preferences, business strategy, corporate structure or other factors. Softbank previously was one of our principal shareholders. On January 14, 2014, Softbank sold its entire stake in our Company, consisting of 4,883,875 ordinary shares. We repurchased 3,883,875 ordinary shares, and Shah Capital Opportunity Fund LP, one of our shareholders, purchased 1,000,000 ordinary shares, for a price of $2.54 per ordinary share. After the consummation of the transaction, Softbank was no longer a related party. In 2019 and 2018, our net sales to Softbank totaled approximately $13.5 million and $31.9 million, respectively, representing approximately 21% and 28%, respectively, of our total net sales in 2019 and 2018. Our net sales to BSNL totaled approximately $31.8 million and $67.0 million, respectively, representing approximately 48% and 58%, respectively, of our total net sales in 2019 and 2018. We anticipate that our dependence on Softbank and BSNL will continue for the foreseeable future.

Consequently, our failure to continue collaborating with Softbank and BSNL may adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations. Any of the following events may cause material fluctuations or declines in our net sales or liquidity position and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations:

BSNL is UTStarcom's long-time customer in India. In particular, our Company took on several major projects during the past few years involving the supply of telecom equipment, installation and commissioning, as well as annual maintenance contracts, and accumulated a significant amount of Accounts Receivable (“AR”). The process of collecting payments from BSNL is taking longer than we had anticipated. As of December 31, 2019, the gross AR amount owed by BSNL to the Company was approximately $53.9 million (INR 3.8 billion).

Our Company has two types of contracts with BSNL. The first type is an annual maintenance contract for regular maintenance service provided to BSNL’s existing system. The revenue for this type of service is recognized after service is rendered and certified by BSNL. Payment is due upon BSNL’s acceptance of the invoices. The second type of contract is related to projects. Normally a project is comprised of two parts: provision of communication equipment and installation services.

For project equipment sales, the payment term of a typical project contract requires substantial payment (50% to 60%) upon equipment delivery and the rest to be paid over time. We issue invoices to BSNL requesting payment when certain contractual milestones are reached. Payment is due upon BSNL’s acceptance of the invoice. For the service component of a project, an invoice is submitted and payment is due after services are rendered and accepted. For sale of both equipment and services, the payment process normally is about 90 days.

Based on the contract terms and the payment history of BSNL, the time period between the delivery of our goods or services and payment receipts is no more than one year, thus there is no financing component in our contracts with BSNL. The total contract amount was recorded as revenue when revenue recognition criteria were met. Correspondingly, the accounts receivable resulting from those BSNL revenues are trade receivables generated during the normal course of business and not financing receivables.

UTStarcom and other equipment providers shipped substantial amounts of equipment to BSNL in 2018 to support BSNL’s network expansion. However, BSNL was delinquent in paying its suppliers as its financial condition deteriorated. Only a limited amount of the outstanding BSNL receivable was collected in 2019 until the end of 2019 when an $8 million was collected. This situation not only adversely affected selling expenses due to a higher AR allowance for doubtful accounts, it also disrupted our normal revenue and cash flow stream. See “Item 5-Operating and Financial Review and Prospect”.

As a 100% state-owned enterprise, BSNL operates under the guidance of India’s Telecommunication Ministry (the “Telecom Ministry”). The Telecom Ministry had been working to rectify BSNL’s financial situation throughout 2019. On October 23, 2019, the Indian government approved a revival plan for BSNL, which includes a $3.3 billion voluntary retirement scheme, a $3.4 billion 4G spectrum allocation and $2.1 billion of sovereign bonds for funding operations and the 4G upgrade. The Indian government also authorized BSNL to monetize $5.4 billion of its assets, such as real estate, optical fiber, and towers. Additionally, the Indian government approved a half billion USD loan guarantee for BSNL in order to raise funds to settle its outstanding vendor payments.

We assessed the current situation and financial outlook for BSNL. Based on the formal financial backing of the Indian government, we believe collectability is probable. We have received partial payment at the end of 2019, and every month in 2020 through April 2020. However, timing of future payments for remaining open Accounts Receivable is uncertain. We are closely monitoring BSNL’s financial and payment activities and accordingly will adjust our AR reserve quarterly.

Investigation by Taiwan Investment Commission (“TWIC”) may cause significantly negative impacts on our business in Taiwan

In February 19, 2019, UTStarcom Taiwan Ltd. (“UTTW”), one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, received an investigation letter from Taiwan Investment Commission (the “TWIC”) of the Ministry of Economic Affairs (the “MOEA”) requesting UTTW to provide information in relation to its shareholders background.

According to the current Taiwan laws and regulations, once the total shareholding in a Taiwan company, directly or indirectly owned by PRC individuals or entities, exceeds 1/3 of the equity interests in this Taiwan company, such company will not be allowed to participate in the operations of certain industries, which includes some of our existing business of UTTW.

Considering the total shareholding in UTTW, directly or indirectly owned by PRC individuals or entities, has exceeded 1/3 of total equity interests, UTTW had to transfer all of our Taiwan business to an unaffiliated local company at the end of August 2019. The liquidation process of UTTW was triggered on December 9, 2019, the dissolution registration was approved by Taipei municipal government on March 9, 2020 and the other formalities will be carried out in due course.

In 2019, 2018 and 2017, the net sales contributed from the Taiwan market were $3.7 million, $6.4 million and $3.0 million, which accounted for 6%, 6% and 3% of our total net sales in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The closing of UTTW will have a negative impact on our business and overall financial condition.

We have a rapidly evolving business model, and if our new product and service offerings fail to attract or retain customers or generate revenue, our growth and operating results could be harmed.

We have a rapidly evolving business model and are regularly exploring entry into new market segments and introduction of new products, features and services with respect to which we may have limited experience. In the past, we have added additional types of services and product offerings, and in some cases, we have modified or discontinued those offerings. We may continue to offer additional types of products or services in the future, but these products and services may not be successful. The additions and modifications to our business have increased its complexity and may present new and significant technological challenges, as well as strains on our management, personnel, operations, systems, technical performance, financial resources, and internal financial control and reporting functions. The future viability of our business will depend on the success of our new business model and product and service offerings, and if they fail to attract or retain customers or generate revenue, our growth and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Our future product sales are unpredictable and our operating results are likely to fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result.

Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future due to a variety of factors, some of which are outside of our control. Factors that may affect our future operating results include:

As a result of these and other factors, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful or indicative of future performance. In addition, the factors noted above may make it difficult for us to forecast our future financial performance. Furthermore, it is possible that in some future quarters our operating results will fall below our internal forecasts, public guidance or the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which may adversely affect the trading price of our ordinary shares.

Changes in government trade policies could limit the demand for our equipment and increase the cost of our equipment.

General trade tensions between the United States and China escalated beginning in 2018. In each of July, August and September 2018, June and September 2019, and February 2020, the U.S. government imposed new or higher tariffs on specified

imported products originating from China in response to what the U.S. government characterizes as unfair trade practices. The Chinese government responded to each of these rounds of U.S. tariff changes by imposing new or higher tariffs on specified products imported from the United States. Higher duties on existing tariffs and further rounds of tariffs have been announced or threatened by U.S. and Chinese leaders.

The imposition of tariffs by the U.S. and Chinese governments and the surrounding economic uncertainty may have a negative impact on the telecommunications equipment industry. Depending upon their duration and implementation, as well as our ability and available alternatives to mitigate their impact, these tariffs could materially affect our business, including in the form of increased cost of goods sold, increased pricing for customers, and reduced sales. In addition, any changes in trade policies between China and certain trading partners could trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries, resulting in further cost escalations and reduced demand for our products. Our access to parts and ability to sell our products could also be impacted by other trade-related factors, such as restrictions on the sale of certain parts into China, or government-promoted “buy local” campaigns.

Competition in our markets may lead to reduced prices, revenues and market share.

We currently face and will continue to face intense competition from both domestic and international companies in our target markets, many of which may operate under lower cost structures and have much larger sales forces than we do. Additionally, other companies not presently offering competing products may also enter our target markets. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, product development, sales, marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in service provider requirements. Our competitors may also be able to devote greater resources than we can to the development, promotion and sale of new products. These competitors may be able to offer significant financing arrangements to service providers, which may give them a competitive advantage in selling systems to service providers with limited financial resources. In many of the developing markets in which we operate or intend to operate, relationships with local governmental telecommunications agencies are important to establish and maintain through permissible means. In many such markets, our competitors may have or be able to establish better relationships with local governmental telecommunications agencies than we have, which could result in their ability to influence governmental policy formation and interpretation to their advantage. Additionally, our competitors might have better relationships with their third-party suppliers and obtain component parts at reduced rates, allowing them to offer their end products at reduced prices. Moreover, the telecommunications and data transmission industries have experienced significant consolidation, and we expect this trend to continue. Increased customer concentration may increase our reliance on larger customers and our bargaining position and profit margins may suffer.

Increased competition is likely to result in price reductions, reduced profit margin and loss of market share, any one of which could materially harm our business, cash flows and financial condition. In order to remain competitive, we must continually reduce the cost of manufacturing our products through design and engineering changes and other cost control measures. We may not be successful in these efforts or in delivering our products to market in a timely manner. In addition, any redesign may not result in sufficient cost reductions to allow us to reduce the prices of our products to remain competitive or to improve or maintain our profit margin, which would cause our financial results to suffer.

To remain competitive, we may enter into contracts with low profitability or even anticipated losses if we believe it is necessary to establish a relationship with a customer or a presence in a market that we consider important to our strategy. Entering into a contract with an anticipated loss requires us to recognize a provision for the entire loss in the period in which it becomes evident rather than in later periods in which contract performance occurs. Entering into contracts with low gross margins adversely affects our reported results when the revenues from such contracts are recognized.

The average selling prices of our products may decrease, which may reduce our revenues and our gross profit.

The average selling prices of our products may decrease in the future in response to product introductions by us or our competitors or other factors, including price pressures from customers. Sales of products with low gross profit margins may adversely affect our profitability and result in losses with respect to such products. Therefore, we must continue to develop, source and introduce new products and enhancements to existing products that incorporate features that can be sold at higher average selling prices. Failure to do so, or the failure of consumers or our direct customers to accept such new products, could cause our revenues and profitability to decline.

Our market is subject to rapid technological change and we must continually introduce new products and product enhancements that achieve market acceptance to compete effectively.

The market for broadband equipment is characterized by rapid technological developments, frequent new product introductions, changes in consumer preferences and evolving industry and regulatory standards. Our success will depend in large part on our ability to enhance our technologies and develop and introduce new products and product enhancements that anticipate changing service provider requirements, technological developments and evolving consumer preferences. We may need to make substantial capital expenditures and incur significant R&D expenses to develop and introduce new products and enhancements. If we fail to

develop and introduce new products or enhancements to existing products that effectively respond to technological change on a timely basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Certain of our products are subject to rapid changes in standards, applications and technologies. Moreover, from time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products or product enhancements, technologies or services that have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycles of our products and that may cause customers to defer purchasing our existing products, resulting in charges for inventory obsolescence reserves. Future technological advances in the communications industry may diminish or inhibit market acceptance of our existing or future products or render our products obsolete. Even if we are able to develop and introduce new products, they may not gain market acceptance. Market acceptance of our products will depend on various factors, including:

If our products fail to obtain market acceptance in a timely manner, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We purchase certain key components and materials used in our products from authorized distributors of sole source suppliers. If we cannot secure adequate supplies of high quality products at competitive prices or in a timely manner, our competitive position, reputation and business could be harmed.

We purchase certain key components and materials, such as chipsets, used in our products from authorized distributors of sole source suppliers. We do not have direct contractual arrangements with the sole source suppliers of chipsets used in our products. If we are unable to obtain high-quality components and materials in the quantities required and at the costs specified by us, we may not be able to find alternative sources on favorable terms, in a timely manner, or at all. Our inability to obtain or to develop alternative sources if and as required could result in delays or reductions in manufacturing or product shipments. From time to time, there may be shortages of certain products or components. Moreover, the components and materials we purchase may be inferior quality products. If an inferior quality product supplied by a third-party is used in our end product and causes a problem, our end product may be deemed responsible and our competitive position, reputation and business could suffer.

Our ability to source a sufficient quantity of high-quality, cost-effective components used in our products may also be limited by import restrictions and duties in the foreign countries where we manufacture our products. We require a significant number of imported components to manufacture our products, and these imported components may be limited by a variety of permit requirements, approval procedures, patent infringement claims, import duties and licensing requirements. Moreover, import duties on such components increase the cost of our products and may make them less competitive.

Our multinational operations may strain our resources and subject us to various economic, political, regulatory and legal risks.

We market and sell our products globally. Our existing multinational operations require significant management attention and financial resources. To continue to manage our global business, we will need to continue to take various actions, including:

If we fail to implement or improve systems or controls or to manage any future growth and transformation effectively, our business could suffer.

Furthermore, our multinational operations are subject to a variety of risks, such as:

In addition, many of the global markets are less developed, presenting additional economic, political, regulatory and legal risks unique to developing economies, such as the following:

In particular, these factors create the potential for physical loss of inventory and misappropriation of operating assets. We have in the past experienced cases of vandalism and armed theft of our equipment that had been or was being installed in the field. If disruptions for any of these reasons become too severe in any particular market, it may become necessary for us to terminate contracts and withdraw from that market and suffer the associated costs and lost revenue.

Our success depends on our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel, including senior managers. If we are not successful in attracting and retaining these personnel and in managing key employee turnover, our business will suffer.

The success of our business depends in significant part upon the continued contributions of key technical and senior management personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. The loss of a key employee, the failure of a key employee to perform satisfactorily in his or her current position or our failure to attract and retain other key technical and senior management employees could have a significant negative impact on our operations.

Notwithstanding our recent workforce restructurings, to effectively manage our operations, we will need to recruit, train, assimilate, motivate and retain qualified employees, especially in China. Competition for qualified employees is intense, and the process of recruiting personnel in all fields, including technology, research and development, sales and marketing, finance and accounting, administration and management with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute our business strategy can be difficult, time-consuming and expensive. We must continue to implement hiring and training processes that are capable of quickly deploying qualified local residents to support our products and services knowledgeably. Alternatively, if there are an insufficient number of qualified local residents available, we might incur substantial costs importing expatriates to service new global markets. For example, we have historically experienced and continue to experience difficulty finding qualified accounting personnel knowledgeable in both U.S. and PRC accounting standards who are PRC residents. In addition, we made changes within our senior management team in China. If our current senior management in China cannot maintain and/or establish key relationships with customers, governmental entities and other relevant parties in China, our business may decline significantly. If we fail to attract, hire, assimilate or retain qualified personnel, our business would be harmed. Our recent layoffs also have an adverse effect on our ability to attract and retain critical staff. Competitors and others have in the past, and may in the future, attempt to recruit our employees. In addition, companies in the telecommunications industry whose employees accept positions with competitors frequently claim that the competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We may be the subject of these types of claims in the future as we seek to hire qualified personnel. Some of these claims may result in material litigation and disruption to our operations. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves against these claims, regardless of their merit.

Currency rate fluctuations may adversely affect our cash flow and operating results.

Our business is subject to risk from changing foreign exchange rates as a substantial part of our business was conducted in a variety of currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In 2019, a majority of our sales were made in India and denominated in Indian Rupee. The value of INR against the U.S. dollar and other currencies fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in the respective country’s monetary or fiscal policies and political and economic conditions and supply and demand in local markets. Over the past 3 years, INR fluctuated about 6%, 9% and 2% against the U.S. dollar in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively. In addition, significant sales were denominated in Japanese Yen and most of our inventory purchases and operating expenses were denominated in Renminbi. Adverse movements in currency exchange rates may negatively affect our cash flow and operating results. In aggregate, we recorded a net foreign currency gain of $0.6 million in 2017, a net foreign currency loss of $2.6 million in 2018, and a net foreign currency loss of $3.9 million in 2019. We currently do not use forward and option contracts to hedge against the risk of foreign currency rate fluctuation in the eventual net cash inflows and outflows resulting from foreign currency denominated transactions with customers, suppliers, and non-U.S. subsidiaries. We are limited in our ability to hedge our exposure to rate fluctuations in certain currencies, including the Renminbi and Indian Rupee, primarily due to governmental currency exchange control regulations that restrict currency conversion and remittance. As a result, fluctuations in foreign currencies may have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Currency exchange control and government restrictions on dividends may impact our ability to transfer funds outside of the China and India.

A significant portion of our business is conducted in China where the currency is the RMB and in India where the currency is the INR. Regulations in China and India permit foreign owned entities to freely convert the RMB or INR into foreign currency for transactions that fall under the “current account,” which includes trade related receipts and payments. Accordingly, our PRC or Indian subsidiaries may use RMB or INR to purchase foreign exchange for settlement of such “current account” transactions without pre-approval. However, pursuant to applicable regulations in China, foreign-invested enterprises in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In calculating accumulated profits, foreign investment enterprises in China are required to allocate at least 10% of their realized profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserves, until these reserves have reached 50% of the registered capital of the enterprises.

Transactions other than those that fall under the “current account” and that involve conversion of RMB or INR into foreign currency are classified as “capital account” transactions; examples of “capital account” transaction include repatriations of investment by or loans to foreign owners, or direct equity investments in a foreign entity by a China domiciled entity. In China, “capital account” transactions will be examined and registered by banks or State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) in China to convert a remittance into a foreign currency, such as U.S. dollars, and transmit the foreign currency outside of China. In India, “capital account” transactions will be examined and approved by the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) to convert INR into a foreign currency, such as U.S. dollars, and transmit the foreign currency outside of India.

The foreign exchange control system in China or India could be changed at any time and any such change may affect the ability of us or our subsidiaries in China or India to repatriate capital or profits, if any, outside China or India. Furthermore, SAFE, RBI or other governmental authorities have a significant degree of administrative discretion in implementing the laws and regulations and has used this discretion to limit convertibility of “current account” payments out of China or India. Whether as a result of a deterioration in the PRC or India balance of payments, a shift in the PRC or Indian macroeconomic prospects or any number of other reasons, China or India could impose additional restrictions on capital remittances abroad. As a result of these and other restrictions under the laws and regulations of the PRC or India, our PRC or India subsidiaries are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to the parent. We have no assurance that the relevant PRC or Indian governmental authorities in the future will not limit further or eliminate the ability of our PRC or Indian subsidiaries to purchase foreign currencies and transfer such funds to us to meet our liquidity or other business needs. Any inability to access funds in China or India, if and when needed for use by us outside of China or India, could have a material and adverse effect on our liquidity and our business.

We may not be able to take advantage of acquisition opportunities or achieve the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions.

We have in the past acquired certain businesses, products and technologies. We will continue to evaluate acquisition prospects that would complement our existing product offerings, augment our market coverage, enhance our technological capabilities, or that may otherwise offer growth opportunities. To the extent we desire to raise additional funds for purposes not currently included in our business plan (such as taking advantage of acquisition opportunities, developing new or enhanced products, responding to competitive pressures, or raising capital for strategic purposes), additional financing for these or other purposes may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our shareholders will experience dilution of their ownership interest, and the newly issued securities may have rights superior to those of ordinary shares. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control. Additionally, debt obligations may subject us to limitations on our operations and increased leverage. In addition, acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired company; failures in realizing anticipated synergies; diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; adverse effects on existing business relationships with customers; difficulties in retaining business relationships with suppliers and customers of the acquired company; risks of entering markets in which we have no direct or limited prior experience; the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company; unanticipated costs; difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration process; failure of our due diligence process to identify significant issues, including issues with respect to product quality, product architecture and legal and financial contingencies; product development; significant exit charges as impairment charges if products or businesses acquired are unsuccessful or do not perform as expected; potential future impairment of our acquisitions or investments; potential full or partial write-offs of acquired assets or investments and associated goodwill; potential expenses related to the amortization of intangible assets; and, in the case of the acquisition of financially troubled businesses, challenges as to the validity of such acquisitions from third party creditors of such businesses.

We may be unable to adequately protect against the loss or misappropriation of our intellectual property, which could substantially harm our business.

We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws and contractual obligations to protect our technology. We have patents issued in the United States and internationally and have pending patent applications internationally. Additional patents may not be issued from our pending patent applications, and our issued patents may not be upheld. In addition, we have, from time to time, chosen to abandon previously filed patent and trademark applications. Moreover, we may face difficulties in registering our existing trademarks in new jurisdictions in which we operate, and we may be forced to abandon or change product or service trademarks because of the unavailability of our existing trademarks or because of oppositions filed or legal challenges to our trademark filings. The intellectual property protection measures that we have taken may not be sufficient to prevent misappropriation of our technology or trademarks and our competitors may independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours. In addition, the legal systems of many foreign countries do not protect or honor intellectual property rights to the same extent as the legal system of the United States. For example, in China, the legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are still in the development stage. It may be very difficult, time-consuming and costly for us to attempt to enforce our intellectual property rights in these jurisdictions.

We may be subject to claims that we infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which could substantially harm our business.

The industry in which we compete is moving towards aggressive assertion, licensing and litigation of patents and other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we have become aware of the possibility or have been notified that we may be infringing certain patents or other intellectual property rights of others. Regardless of their merit, responding to such claims could be time consuming, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. In addition, although some of our supplier contracts provide for indemnification from the supplier with respect to losses or expenses incurred in connection with any infringement claim, certain contracts with our key suppliers do not provide for such protection. Moreover, certain of our sales contracts provide that we must indemnify our customers against claims by third parties for intellectual property rights infringement

related to our products. There are no limitations on the maximum potential future payments under these guarantees. Therefore, we may incur substantial costs related to any infringement claim, which may substantially harm our results of operations and financial condition.

We have been and may in the future become subject to litigation to defend against claimed infringements of the rights of others or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Future litigation may also be necessary to enforce and protect our patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights. Any intellectual property litigation or threatened intellectual property litigation could be costly, and adverse determinations or settlements could result in the loss of our proprietary rights, subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses from or pay royalties to third parties which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and/or prevent us from manufacturing or selling our products, which could cause disruptions to our operations.

In the event that there is a successful claim of infringement against us and we fail to develop non-infringing technology or license the proprietary rights on commercially reasonable terms and conditions, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

We are subject to risks related to our financial and strategic investments in third party businesses.

From time to time, we make financial and/or strategic investments in third party businesses. We cannot be certain that such investments will be successful. In certain instances, we have lost part or all of the value of such investments, resulting in a financial loss and/or the loss of potential strategic opportunities. We recognize an impairment charge on our investment when a decline in the fair value of such investment below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. In making this determination, we review several factors to determine whether the losses are other-than-temporary, including but not limited to: (i) the length of time the investment was in an unrealized loss position, (ii) the extent to which fair value was less than cost, (iii) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and (iv) our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded impairment charges of nil and $0.4 million related to investments, respectively. If we have to write down or write-off our investments, or if potential strategic opportunities do not develop as planned, our financial performance may suffer. Moreover, these investments are often illiquid, such that it may be difficult or impossible for us to monetize such investments.

We could incur asset impairment charges for long-lived assets or long-term investments, which could negatively affect our future operating results and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2019, we had long-lived assets and long-term investments. We perform periodic assessments for any possible impairment of long-lived assets and long-term investments for accounting purposes. We review the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets held and used and long-lived assets to be disposed of whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets or asset groups may not be recoverable. Any such charge may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

When determining whether an asset impairment has occurred or calculating such impairment for long-term investments or other long-lived asset, fair value is determined using the present value of estimated cash flows or comparable market values. Our valuation methodology requires management to make judgments and assumptions based on projected future cash flows, the timing of such cash flows, discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, perpetual growth rates, the determination of appropriate comparable entities and the determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to these comparable entities. Projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from actual results. Changes in estimates and/or revised assumptions affecting the present value of estimated future cash flows or comparable market values may result in a decrease in fair value of a reporting unit, or a decrease in fair value of long-lived assets or asset groups, our acquisitions or investments. The decrease in fair value could result in a non-cash impairment charge.

Product defect or quality issues may divert management’s attention from our business and/or result in costs and expenses that could adversely affect our operating results.

Product defects or performance quality issues could cause us to lose customers and revenue or to incur unexpected expenses. Many of our products are highly complex and may have quality deficiencies resulting from the design or manufacturing of such product, or from the software or components used in the product. Often these issues are identified prior to the shipment of the products and may cause delays in market acceptance of our products, delays in shipping products to customers, or the cancellation of orders. In other cases, we may identify the quality issues after the shipment of products. In such cases, we may incur unexpected expenses and diversion of resources to replace defective products or correct problems. Such pre-shipment and post-shipment quality issues could result in delays in the recognition of revenue, loss of revenue or future orders, and damage to our reputation and customer relationships. In addition, we may be required to pay damages for failed performance under certain customer contracts, and may receive claims from customers related to the performance of our products.

We are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding privacy and data protection.

We may collect personal data while providing products, services and solutions to our customers. Our reputation may be damaged due to the collection, use, disclosure or security of personal information or other privacy-related matters, even if unfounded, which will cause us to lose users and other customers and adversely affect our operations. We strive to comply with applicable laws and regulations on data protection, as well as our privacy policies and data protection obligations in accordance with our terms of use and other obligations we may have. However, any non-compliance or perceived non-compliance with these laws, regulations or policies may lead to investigations and other lawsuits against us by government agencies or other individuals. These actions would have a negative impact on our reputation and brand, may cause us to lose users and customers, and have a negative impact on our business. Besides, any systems failure or compromise of our security that results in the unauthorized access to or release of our users’ or other customers’ data would greatly limit the adoption of our products and services, harm our reputation and brand, as well as affect our business.

Many jurisdictions have adopted or are adopting new data privacy and data protection laws that may impose further onerous compliance requirements, such as data localization, which prohibits companies from storing data relating to resident individuals in data centers outside the jurisdiction. The proliferation of such laws within jurisdictions and countries in which we operate may result in conflicting and contradictory requirements. PRC government authorities have promulgated laws and regulations to protect personal information from any abuse or unauthorized disclosure. Pursuant to the Order for the Protection of Telecommunication and Internet User Personal Information issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology in July 2013, any collection and use of user personal information must be subject to the consent of the user, abide by the principles of legality, rationality and necessity and be within the specified purposes, methods and scopes. Besides, Personal Information Protection Act has been listed into the legislative plan, which will strengthen the supervision of the collection of personal information. Furthermore, the draft of Information Security Technology- Personal Information Security Specification (“Specification”) was issued by National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee on February 1, 2019. Pursuant to the draft of the Specification, product and service providers should take technical and other necessary measures to ensure the safety of personal information, clearly demonstrate the purpose, approaches and scope of processing the personal information to the individual and acquire the authorization.

In order for us to maintain or become compliant with applicable laws as they come into effect, it may require substantial expenditures on resources to continually evaluate our policies and processes and adapt to new requirements that are or become applicable to us. Complying with any additional or new regulatory requirements on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis would impose significant burdens and costs on our operations or may require us to alter our business practices. While we strive to protect our users’ privacy and data security and to comply with material data protection laws and regulations applicable to us, it is possible that our practices are, and will continue to be, inconsistent with certain regulatory requirements. Our international business operations could be adversely affected if these laws and regulations are interpreted or implemented in a manner that is inconsistent with our current business practices or that requires changes to these practices. If these laws and regulations materially limit our ability to collect and use user data, our ability to continue our current operations without modification, develop new services or features of the products and expand our user base will be impaired. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with applicable data privacy laws and regulations, including in relation to the collection of necessary end-user consents and providing end-users with sufficient information with respect to our use of their personal data, may result in fines and penalties imposed by regulators, governmental enforcement actions (including enforcement orders requiring us to cease collecting or processing data in a certain way), litigation and/or adverse publicity. Proceedings against us—regulatory, civil or otherwise—could force us to spend money and devote resources in the defense or settlement of, and remediation related to, such proceedings.

Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure, external interference with our information technology systems, incidents of terrorism and other events beyond our control that affect us, either directly or indirectly through one or more of our key suppliers. Also, our operations and markets in China, Japan and India are located in areas prone to earthquakes. We do not have a detailed disaster recovery plan, and the occurrence of any events like these that disrupt our business could harm our business and operating results.

We face risks related to outbreaks of health epidemics, natural disasters, and other extraordinary events, which could significantly disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2019, a novel and deadly strain of coronavirus was reported, and started to circulate widely in January 2020. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared this COVID-19 outbreak a health emergency of international concern. On February 28, 2020, the World Health Organization increased the assessment of this risk of spread and the risk of impact of COVID-19 to very high at global level. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 a pandemic. Chinese government actions to control and prevent the spreading of COVID-19 in China resulted in the temporary closure of our headquarters, factory, and other offices in February and March 2020. Actions by governments in other affected countries resulted in further office closures around the world. Although we were able to shift a significant portion of our employees to work from home, we still experienced reduced productivity, delayed shipments, and diminished marketing activity. Although the Chinese government started to gradually reduce health-related restrictions, and our operations in China are steadily returning to normal and we have adopted and implemented health protocols allowing half of the employees to work onsite, the global pandemic has affected our global operations to date,

including operations in India, Japan and United States outside of China. In India, we expect government health-related actions to have a material impact on our financial condition. We have a large overdue receivable from a major customer in India; we expect delays in payments due to COVID-19 containment actions in that country. Although we expect the global COVID-19 disruption to be temporary, there is uncertainty around the duration of the disruption and the possibility of other effects on our business. In the event that this pandemic cannot be effectively and timely contained, our ability to consistently offer products and services in the future may be significantly disrupted, and may adversely affect our business operations, financial condition and operating results for 2020, including but not limited to negative impact to the Company’s total revenues, slower collection of accounts receivables and additional allowance for doubtful accounts.

In general, the Company, its employees, and its business partners are vulnerable to epidemics, natural disasters and other calamities, including fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, war, riots, terrorist attacks, and any other similar event that may give rise to a loss of personnel, damages to property, server interruptions, breakdowns, technology platform failures or internet failures. In such cases, our operations could be materially and adversely affected. Any such occurrences could cause severe disruption to our daily operations, and may even require a temporary closure of our offices. Such closures may disrupt our business operations and adversely affect our results of operations.

Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have a material adverse effect on our business and share price.

We are subject to reporting obligations under the United States securities laws. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, requires that we establish and maintain an effective internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting and include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report. Our Annual Report on Form 20-F must contain an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that we have identified.

As of December 31, 2019, we have identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and have concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2019. The requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are ongoing and also apply to future years. We expect that our internal control over financial reporting will continue to evolve as we continue in our efforts to transform our business. Although we are committed to continue to improve our internal control processes and we will continue to diligently and vigorously review our internal control over financial reporting in order to ensure compliance with the Section 404 requirements, any control system, regardless of how well designed, operated and evaluated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. In addition, successful remediation of the control deficiencies identified as of December 31, 2019 is dependent on our ability to hire and retain qualified employees and consultants. Therefore, we cannot be certain that in the future additional material weakness or significant deficiencies will not exist or otherwise be discovered. See ”Item 15-Controls and Procedures” contained in UTStarcom Holdings Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019”.

Uncertainties with respect to China’s economic, political and social condition, as well as government policies, could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

A significant portion of our business operations are conducted in China. Accordingly, our results of operations, financial condition and prospects are subject to a significant degree to economic, political and legal developments in China. China’s economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including with respect to the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange, and allocation of resources. Although the PRC government has implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform, the reduction of state ownership of productive assets, and the establishment of improved corporate governance in business enterprises, a substantial portion of productive assets in China is still owned by the government. In addition, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The PRC government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth by allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy, regulating financial services and institutions and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past decades, growth has been uneven across different regions and among various economic sectors of China. The PRC government has implemented various economic and political policies and laws and regulations to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the overall PRC economy, but may also have a negative effect on us. Our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to us. In addition, the PRC government has implemented in the past certain measures to control the pace of economic growth. For example, from time to time, the PRC government may implement monetary, fiscal and other policies or otherwise make efforts to alter the investment-driven growth model of China’s economy, which could result in decreased capital expenditures by our end customers in China, reduce their demand for our products, and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

There are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws, rules and regulations.

A significant portion of our operations are conducted in the PRC, and are governed by PRC laws, rules and regulations. Our PRC subsidiaries are subject to laws, rules and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China. The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common-law system, prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value.

In 1979, the PRC government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws, rules and regulations governing economic matters in general. The overall effect of legislation since that time has significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investment in China. However, China has not developed a fully integrated legal system, and recently enacted laws, rules and regulations may not sufficiently cover all aspects of economic activities in China or may be subject to significant degrees of interpretation by PRC regulatory agencies. In particular, because these laws, rules and regulations are relatively new, and because of the limited number of published decisions and the nonbinding nature of such decisions, because the laws, rules and regulations often give the relevant regulator significant discretion in how to enforce them, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws, rules and regulations involve uncertainties and can be inconsistent and unpredictable. In addition, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all, and which may have a retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of these policies and rules until after the occurrence of the violation.

Any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in the value of the RMB relative to the U.S. dollar could affect our operating results and may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

We prepare our financial statements in U.S. dollars, while we conduct a significant portion of our operations in China where the only legitimate currency for use within is RMB. The value of RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in China’s monetary or fiscal policies and political and economic conditions and supply and demand in local markets. Since July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the RMB to the U.S. dollar. Following the removal of the U.S. dollar peg, the RMB appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the RMB has started to appreciate slowly against the U.S. dollar, though there have been periods when the U.S. dollar has appreciated against the RMB. On August 11, 2015, the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) allowed the RMB to depreciate by approximately 2% against the U.S. dollar. Since then and until the end of 2016, the RMB has depreciated against the U.S. dollar by approximately 10%. Over 2017, RMB rose almost 6.3% against the U.S. dollar partly because of the weakened U.S. dollar but mainly due to Chinese government’s policy to keep the currency stable in avoidance of capital flight outside of China. Over 2018, RMB depreciated almost 5.7% against the U.S. dollar. Over 2019, RMB depreciated almost 1.23% against the U.S. dollar.

It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may affect the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar in the future.

As we have significant operations in China, any significant revaluation of the RMB may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenue, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our ordinary shares in U.S. dollars.

We may be deemed a PRC resident enterprise under the Enterprise Income Tax Law and be subject to PRC taxation on our worldwide income.

The Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the EIT Law, provides that enterprises established outside of China whose “de facto management bodies” are located within China are considered “resident enterprises” and are generally subject to the uniform 25% enterprise income tax rate on their worldwide income (including dividend income received from subsidiaries). Under the Implementing Regulations for the EIT Law, “de facto management body” is defined as a body that has material and overall management and control over the manufacturing and business operations, personnel and human resources, finances and treasury, and acquisition and disposition of properties and other assets of an enterprise. The State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”), issued the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Determination of Chinese-Controlled Enterprises Registered Overseas as Resident Enterprises on the Basis of Their Bodies of Actual Management, or Circular 82, on April 22, 2009. Circular 82 provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a Chinese-controlled

offshore-incorporated enterprise is located in China. Although Circular 82 only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises, not those controlled by foreign enterprises or individuals, the determining criteria set forth in Circular 82 may reflect the SAT’s general position on how the “de facto management body” test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises. Since substantially all of our operational management is currently based in the PRC, it is unclear whether PRC tax authorities would require (or permit) us to be treated as a PRC-resident enterprise. If we are treated as a resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes, we will be subject to PRC tax on our worldwide income at the 25% uniform tax rate, which could have an impact on our effective tax rate and an adverse effect on our net income and the results of operations, although dividends distributed from our PRC Subsidiaries to us could be exempted from Chinese dividend withholding tax, since such income is exempted under the EIT Law for PRC-resident recipients.

Dividends payable by us to our foreign investors and profits on the sale of our shares may be subject to tax under PRC tax laws.

Under the Implementing Regulations for the EIT Law, PRC income tax at the rate of 10% is applicable to dividends payable to investors that are “non-resident enterprises,” not having an establishment or place of business in the PRC, or which do have such establishment or place of business but the relevant income is not effectively connected with the establishment or place of business, to the extent that such dividends have their sources within the PRC. Similarly, any profits realized through the transfer of shares by such investors are also subject to 10% PRC income tax if such profits are regarded as income derived from sources within the PRC. It is unclear whether dividends we pay with respect to our share, or the profits you may realize from the transfer of our shares, would be treated as income derived from sources within the PRC and be subject to PRC tax. If we are required under the Implementing Regulations for the EIT Law to withhold PRC income tax on dividends payable to our non-PRC investors that are “non-resident enterprises,” or if you are required to pay PRC income tax on the transfer of our shares, the value of your investment in our shares may be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, pursuant to the Arrangement between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by a PRC enterprise to a Hong Kong enterprise may be reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10% if the Hong Kong enterprise directly holds at least 25% of the PRC enterprise. Pursuant to the Notice on the Issues concerning the Application of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements issued by the SAT on February 20, 2009, or SAT Circular 81, a Hong Kong resident enterprise must meet the following conditions, among others, in order to apply the reduced withholding tax rate: (i) it must be a company; (ii) it must directly own the required percentage of equity interests and voting rights in the PRC resident enterprise; and (iii) it must have directly owned such required percentage in the PRC resident enterprise throughout the 12 months prior to receiving the dividends. On October 14, 2019, SAT promulgated the Administrative Measures on Non-resident Taxpayers Enjoying Treaty Benefits, or SAT Circular 35, which became effective on January 1, 2020. SAT Circular 35 provides that Non-resident taxpayers' enjoyment of treaty benefits shall be handled in the manner of “self-assessment, claim for and enjoyment of treaty benefits, and retention of relevant materials for review”. If a non-resident taxpayer determines through self-assessment that he or she is eligible for treaty benefits, he or she may, when filing tax returns, or when a withholding agent files withholding returns, enjoy tax treaty benefits, and collect and retain relevant materials for review in accordance with the provisions of SAT Circular 35 and accept the follow-up administration of tax authorities. Accordingly, UTStarcom Hong Kong Ltd. may be able to benefit from the 5% withholding tax rate for the dividends it receives from UTStarcom Telecom Co., Ltd., if it satisfies the conditions prescribed under SAT Circular 81 and other relevant tax rules and regulations. However, according to SAT Circular 81, and SAT Circular 35, if the relevant tax authorities consider the transactions or arrangements we have are for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax in the future.

There are uncertainties with respect to Value-Added Tax Rates relating to the tax liabilities of our PRC subsidiaries.

On March 20, 2019, the Announcement of the Ministry of Finance, the State Administration of Taxation and the General Administration of Customs on Issuing Relevant Policies for Deepening the Reform of Value-Added Tax were promulgated and became effective on April 1, 2019, together with two other relevant announcements and one circular. These policies indicated that the current Value-Added Tax rate of 16 percent in sale and imported goods was reduced to 13 percent, and the current Value-Added Tax rate of 10 percent in other categories of sale and imported goods was reduced to 9 percent from April 1, 2019. In addition, the scope of business Value-Added Tax deductions was expanded. Furthermore, the refund system of the period-end excess input Value-Added Tax for trial implementation was adopted from April 1, 2019. Given these changes, it may be difficult to predict whether the Value-Added Tax Rates will remain unchanged in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

PRC regulations establish more complex procedures for acquisitions conducted by foreign investors which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions.

On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies, namely, the PRC Ministry of Commerce, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of State Council (“SASAC”), the State Administration of Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”), and SAFE, jointly adopted the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rule, which became effective on

September 8, 2006 and was amended on June 22, 2009. The M&A Rule established new procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that the Ministry of Commerce be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. On February 3, 2011, the General Office of the State Council promulgated the Notice on Launching the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Security Review Notice, which became effective on March 6, 2011. The M&A Security Review Notice provides for certain circumstances under which foreign investors’ acquisition of domestic enterprises shall be subject to the security review of the PRC governments. The security review assesses such acquisition’s impact on national security, stable operation of national economy, basic living of the people, and R&D capacity for key technologies related to national security. On August 25, 2011, the Ministry of Commerce of PRC promulgated the Regulation of Ministry of Commerce on Implementation of the Security Review System for Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Security Review Regulation, which became effective on September 1, 2011. The M&A Security Review Regulation stipulates the requirements of application documents and security review procedures of the Ministry of Commerce. In the future, we may grow our business in part by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the M&A Rule, the M&A Security Review Notice and the M&A Security Review Regulation to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the Ministry of Commerce or its provincial affiliates, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

Strengthened scrutiny over acquisition transactions by the PRC tax authorities may have a negative impact on our acquisition strategy.

In connection with the EIT Law, the Ministry of Finance and SAT jointly issued, on April 30, 2009, the Notice on Issues Concerning Process of Enterprise Income Tax in Enterprise Restructuring Business, or Circular 59. Circular 59 became effective retroactively on January 1, 2008, and amended on December 25, 2014. Under this circular, non-PRC-resident enterprises may be subject to income tax on capital gains generated from their transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises. The PRC tax authorities have the discretion under Circular 59 to make adjustments to the taxable capital gains based on the difference between the fair value of the equity interests transferred and the cost of the investment. In addition, by promulgating and implementing the circulars, the PRC tax authorities have strengthened their scrutiny over the direct or indirect transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise by a non-PRC-resident enterprise.

On February 3, 2015, the SAT issued the Notice on Several Issues regarding Enterprise Income Tax for Indirect Transfer of Assets by Non-resident Enterprises, or SAT Bulletin 7, which specifies that the SAT is entitled to redefine the nature of an equity transfer where offshore vehicles are interposed for tax avoidance purposes and without reasonable commercial purpose, specifically, further specified the criteria for judging reasonable commercial purpose, and the legal requirements for the voluntary reporting procedures and filing materials in the case of indirect transfer of assets. Pursuant to this Bulletin, an “indirect transfer” of assets, including equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise, by non-PRC resident enterprises may be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of PRC taxable assets, if such arrangement does not have a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of avoiding payment of PRC enterprise income tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax. According to SAT Bulletin 7, “PRC taxable assets” include assets attributed to an establishment in China, immoveable properties located in China, and equity investments in PRC resident enterprises, in respect of which gains from their transfer by a direct holder, being a non-PRC resident enterprise, would be subject to PRC enterprise income taxes.

SAT Bulletin 7 listed several factors to be taken into consideration by tax authorities in determining whether an indirect transfer has a reasonable commercial purpose. However, despite these factors, an indirect transfer satisfying all the following criteria shall be deemed to lack reasonable commercial purpose and be taxable under the PRC laws: (i) 75% or more of the equity value of the intermediary enterprise being transferred is derived directly or indirectly from the PRC taxable properties; (ii) at any time during the one year period before the indirect transfer, 90% or more of the asset value of the intermediary enterprise (excluding cash) is comprised directly or indirectly of investments in the PRC, or 90% or more of its income is derived directly or indirectly from the PRC; (iii) the functions performed and risks assumed by the intermediary enterprise and any of its subsidiaries that directly or indirectly hold the PRC taxable properties are limited and are insufficient to prove their economic substance; and (iv) the foreign tax payable on the gains derived from the indirect transfer of the PRC taxable properties is lower than the potential PRC tax on the direct transfer of such assets. Nevertheless, the indirect transfer falling into the scope of the safe harbor under SAT Bulletin 7 may not be subject to PRC tax and such safe harbor includes qualified group restructuring, public market trading and tax treaty exemptions. On October 17, 2017, the SAT promulgated the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Circular 37, which became effective on December 1, 2017 and was revised on June 15, 2018, to completely repeal the second paragraph of Section 8 of SAT Bulletin 7 and the Notice on Strengthening the Management on Enterprise Income Tax for Non-resident Enterprises Equity Transfer, or Circular 698. SAT Circular 37, among other things, simplified procedures of withholding and payment of income tax levied on non-resident enterprises.

Under SAT Bulletin 7, the entities or individuals obligated to pay the transfer price to the transferor shall be the withholding agent and shall withhold the PRC tax from the transfer price. If the withholding agent fails to do so, the transferor shall report to and pay the PRC tax to the PRC tax authorities. In case neither the withholding agent nor the transferor complies with the obligations

under SAT Bulletin 7, other than imposing penalties such as late payment interest on the transferors, the tax authority may also hold the withholding agent liable and impose a penalty of 50% to 300% of the unpaid tax on the withholding agent, provided that such penalty imposed on the withholding agent may be reduced or waived if the withholding agent has submitted the relevant materials in connection with the indirect transfer to the PRC tax authorities in accordance with SAT Bulletin 7.

Since we pursue acquisitions as one of our growth strategies, and have conducted and may conduct acquisitions involving complex corporate structures, the PRC tax authorities may, at their discretion, adjust the capital gains and impose tax return filing obligations on us or request us to submit additional documentation for their review in connection with any of our acquisitions, thus causing us to incur additional acquisition costs.

Restrictions on direct foreign investments in certain business sectors may require that we enter into contractual arrangements with our PRC business partners, which are subject to potential risks and uncertainties.

We anticipate that providing value-added support services to businesses in the telecom and cable sectors will be a significant component of our future business model. We will provide operators engaging in these businesses with services, including equipment installation, system installation and maintenance, technical services and other value-added services, in return for on-going revenue. We anticipate that these value-added support services will play an important role in the growth of our business.

Direct foreign investments are subject to certain restrictions with respect to the operating of telecom and cable sectors. Under the “Telecommunications Regulations” issued by the State Council on September 25, 2000, firstly amended on July 29, 2014 and secondly amended on February 6, 2016, the “Provisions on Administration of Foreign Invested Telecommunications Enterprises” issued by the State Council on December 11, 2001, firstly amended on September 10, 2008 and secondly amended on February 6, 2016, the “Notice of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on Removing the Restrictions on Foreign Equity Ratios in Online Data Processing and Transaction Processing (Operating E-commerce) Business” (Gongxinbutong [2015] No.196) issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on June 19, 2015, and Special Administrative Measures for Access of Foreign Investment (Negative List) (2019 Edition) issued by National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”), together with the PRC Ministry of Commerce the shareholding of foreign investors is limited to up to 49% for basic telecom business and up to 50% for almost all value-added telecom business, only e-commerce business, domestic multi-party, communication, store-and-forward and call center (our business not included) allows foreign equity to reach to 100%.

Because of the regulatory restrictions on direct foreign investments in the telecom and cable sectors, we may conduct business through contractual relationships with PRC business partners that are licensed or qualified to operate such businesses, or the Operating Companies. Our PRC subsidiaries may directly or indirectly provide certain technology services to the Operating Companies through an arrangement of technology service agreements and will receive service fees directly or indirectly from the Operating Companies. To ensure the payment of the service fee by the Operating Companies, the shareholders of the Operating Companies may pledge their equity interests in the Operating Companies to our PRC subsidiaries or affiliates. There may also be a call option arrangement so that our PRC subsidiaries may purchase the equity interests in the Operating Companies if permitted by the laws of the PRC.

The contractual arrangements are subject to potential risks and uncertainties and may not be as effective in providing operational control and economic benefits as direct equity ownership. The 2019 Law of Foreign Investment which was issued on March 15, 2019 and became effective on January 1, 2020 and its implementing regulations do not mention concepts including “de facto control” and “controlling through contractual arrangements,” nor do they specify the regulation on controlling through contractual arrangements. However, the 2019 Law of Foreign Investment stipulates that “foreign investment includes foreign investors invested in China through any other methods under laws, administrative regulations, or provisions prescribed by the State Council,” which correspondingly means there are possibilities that State Council may promulgate future laws, administrative regulations or provisions to stipulate contractual arrangements as a way of foreign investment and our contractual arrangements would be regarded as foreign investment. If that is the case, whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the foreign investment access requirements and how our contractual arrangements will be handled are subject to uncertainties. The PRC tax authorities may scrutinize the contractual arrangements for whether the technology service fee paid by the Operating Companies to our PRC subsidiaries or affiliates will substantially reduce the income tax and business tax payable by the Operating Companies. Additionally, there is uncertainty with respect to the attitude of judicial authorities on the enforceability of the contractual arrangements in the event the Operating Companies or their shareholders breach the contracts. The inability to participate in the telecom, cable and/or media sectors as presently expected through the contractual arrangements or the inability to enforce our rights under such contractual arrangements could result in a negative impact on our business.

PRC regulation of loans to, and direct investment in, PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may restrict or prevent us from using the offshore capital we raise to make loans to our PRC subsidiaries, or to make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries.

In utilizing the proceeds of any offshore fund raising, we, as an offshore holding company, are permitted under PRC laws and regulations to provide funding to our PRC subsidiaries, which are treated as foreign-invested enterprises under PRC laws, through

loans or capital contributions. However, loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries to finance their activities cannot exceed statutory limits and must be registered with the local counterpart of SAFE and capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries are subject to the requirement of making necessary filings in the Foreign Investment Comprehensive Management Information System, and registration with other governmental authorities in China.

SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or Circular 19, effective on June 1, 2015, in replacement of the Circular on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the Administration of the Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign Invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 142, the Notice from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Relevant Issues Concerning Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Exchange Businesses, or Circular 59, and the Circular on Further Clarification and Regulation of the Issues Concerning the Administration of Certain Capital Account Foreign Exchange Businesses, or Circular 45. According to Circular 19, the flow and use of the RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company is regulated such that RMB capital may not be used for the issuance of RMB entrusted loans, the repayment of inter-enterprise loans or the repayment of banks loans that have been transferred to a third party. Although Circular 19 allows RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign invested enterprise to be used for equity investments within the PRC, it also reiterates the principle that RMB converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital of a foreign-invested company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope. Thus, it is unclear whether SAFE will permit such capital to be used for equity investments in the PRC in actual practice. SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or Circular 16, effective on June 9, 2016, which reiterates some of the rules set forth in Circular 19, but changes the prohibition against using RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company to issue RMB entrusted loans to a prohibition against using such capital to issue loans to non-associated enterprises. Violations of SAFE Circular 19 and Circular 16 could result in administrative penalties. Circular 19 and Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to transfer any foreign currency we hold to our PRC subsidiaries, which may adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business in the PRC.

In light of the various requirements imposed by PRC regulations on loans to, and direct investment in, PRC entities by offshore holding companies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans to our PRC subsidiaries or future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiaries. As a result, uncertainties exist as to our ability to provide prompt financial support to our PRC subsidiaries when needed. If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals, our ability to use foreign currency, including the proceeds we received from this offering, and to capitalize or otherwise fund our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.

PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC residents and employee stock options granted by overseas-listed companies may increase our administrative burden. If our shareholders who are PRC residents, or our PRC employees who are granted or exercise stock options, fail to make any required registrations or filings, we may be unable to distribute profits and may become subject to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions under PRC laws.

SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Relating to Domestic Resident’s Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37, in July 2014 that requires PRC residents or entities to register with SAFE or its local branch in connection with their establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or financing. In addition, such PRC residents or entities must update their SAFE registrations when the offshore special purpose vehicle undergoes material events relating to any change of basic information (including change of such PRC citizens or residents, name and operation term), increases or decreases in investment amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, or mergers or divisions. According to the Notice on Further Simplify and Improve Administrative Policies Regarding Foreign Direct Investment issued by the SAFE on February 13, 2015, starting from June 1, 2015, all new such registrations (different from make-up registrations) shall be handled by the authorized local banks instead of the local SAFE branches.

SAFE Circular 37 was issued to replace the Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents Engaging in Financing and Roundtrip Investments via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 75. If our shareholders who are PRC residents or entities do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches, our PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to us, and we may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital to our PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, we also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional share incentive plans for our directors and employees under PRC law. We cannot compel our beneficial owners to comply with SAFE registration requirements . As a result, we cannot assure you that all of our shareholders or beneficial owners who are PRC residents or entities have complied with, and will in the future make or obtain any applicable registrations or approvals required by, SAFE regulations.

On March 28, 2007, SAFE promulgated the Application Procedure of Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Employee Stock Holding Plan or Stock Option Plan of Overseas Listed Company, or the Stock Option Rule, to regulate foreign exchange procedures for PRC individuals participating in employee stock holding and stock option plans of

overseas companies. Under the Stock Option Rule, a PRC domestic individual must comply with various foreign exchange procedures through a domestic agent institution when participating in any employee stock holding plan or stock option plan of an overseas listed company. Certain domestic agent institutions, such as the PRC subsidiaries of an overseas listed company, a labor union of such company that is a legal person or a qualified financial institution, among others things, shall file with SAFE and be responsible for completing relevant foreign exchange procedures on behalf of PRC domestic individuals, such as applying to obtain SAFE approval for exchanging foreign currency in connection with owning stock or stock option exercises. Concurrent with the filing of such applications with SAFE, the PRC subsidiary, as a domestic agent, must obtain approval from SAFE to open a special foreign exchange account at a PRC domestic bank to hold the funds in connection with the stock purchase or option exercise, any returns based on stock sales, any stock dividends issued and any other income or expenditures approved by SAFE. The PRC subsidiary also is required to obtain approval from SAFE to open an overseas special foreign exchange account at an overseas trust bank to hold overseas funds used in connection with any stock purchase. The domestic agent institution is required to make a quarterly filing with SAFE to update SAFE with relevant information, including the exercise of options by employees, the holding of shares by employees and the funds in the special foreign exchange account and the overseas special foreign exchange account.

Under the Stock Option Rule, all proceeds obtained by PRC domestic individuals from sales of stock shall be fully remitted back to China after relevant overseas expenses are deducted. The foreign exchange proceeds from these sales can be converted into RMB or transferred to the individual’s foreign exchange savings account after the proceeds have been remitted back to the special foreign exchange account opened at the PRC domestic bank. If the stock option is exercised in a cashless exercise, the PRC domestic individuals are required to remit the proceeds to the special foreign exchange account. The Stock Option Rule does not provide for specific forms of penalties for noncompliance but provides that SAFE may impose penalties in accordance with the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulation, Implementing Rules for Individual Foreign Exchange Regulation and other related PRC regulations under which the penalties for noncompliance with foreign exchange administration rules include fines against both our company and our implicated employees.

On February 15, 2012, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Certain Foreign Exchange Issues Relating to Domestic Individuals’ Participation in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Listed Company, or the New Stock Option Rule. Upon the effectiveness of the New Stock Option Rule on February 15, 2012, the Stock Option Rule became void, although the basic requirements and procedures provided under the Stock Option Rule are kept unchanged in the New Stock Option Rule, i.e., the domestic employees participating in a stock incentive plan of an overseas listed company shall appoint the PRC subsidiary of the overseas listed company or a domestic qualified agent to make the registration of the stock incentive plan with SAFE and handle all foreign exchange-related matters of the stock incentive plan through the special bank account approved by SAFE. The New Stock Option Rule clarifies that the domestic subsidiary of an overseas listed company shall include the limited liability company, partnership and the representative office directly or indirectly established by such overseas listed company in China and the domestic employees shall include the directors, supervisors, senior management and other employees of the domestic subsidiary, including the foreign employees of the domestic subsidiary who continuously reside in China for no less than one year.

Similar to the Stock Option Rule, the New Stock Option Rule requires that the annual allowance with respect to the purchase of foreign exchange in connection with stock holding or stock option exercises shall be subject to the approval of SAFE. The New Stock Option Rule further requires that the material amendments of the stock incentive plan shall be filed with SAFE within three months following the occurrence of the material amendments. The domestic agent shall also make a quarterly update to SAFE to disclose the information with respect to the stock option exercises, the stock holding and foreign exchange matters. If the domestic employees or the domestic agent fails to comply with the requirements of the New Stock Option Rule, SAFE may require a remedy and even impose administrative penalties that SAFE deems appropriate.

We and our PRC employees who have been granted stocks or stock options are subject to the Stock Option Rule and the New Stock Option Rule. In May 2008, UTStarcom (China) Co., Ltd (“UTSC”), our former PRC subsidiary, made a filing with SAFE’s Beijing branch as required by the Stock Option Rule for UTSC’s PRC employees who participate in our employee stock option plans and UTSC obtained approval to open a special foreign exchange account at a PRC domestic bank. Subject to the Stock Option Rule, UTSC submitted material amendments of the stock incentive plan for its PRC employees in June 2011. Along with this submission, UTSC, as the domestic subsidiary of our overseas listed company, submitted on behalf of UTStarcom Telecom Co., Ltd (“HUTS”), the materials for the necessary filings for their PRC employees who participate in our employee stock option plan, which was officially accepted by SAFE’s Beijing branch in December 2011, but the final approval was not issued until March 31, 2012 when the New Stock Option Rule became effective. After the effectiveness of the New Stock Option Rule, we do not need to make a new registration for UTSC, HUTS and UTStarcom (Chongqing) Telecom Co., Ltd (“CUTS”), but as required by SAFE, the application materials will have to be adjusted. Before we submitted the adjusted application material to SAFE, we divested our IPTV equipment business in August 2012, and as a result, UTSC is no longer our subsidiary. In addition, CUTS and UTStarcom (Beijing) Technologies (“UTST”) completed the cancellation of business registration. Therefore, we were required to make adjustments to the filings with SAFE for HUTS. On December 4, 2018, HUTS obtained the relevant approval from SAFE Zhejiang Branch and was allowed to set the foreign exchange special account. In the future, we are also required to comply with other requirements applicable to HUTS which have completed the registration, including a quarterly update to SAFE, the registration of material amendments to our stock incentive plan and the registration for the foreign employees of our PRC subsidiaries when they continuously reside in China for no less than one year.

The enforcement of the laws on Employment Contracts and other labor-related regulations in the PRC may adversely affect our business and our results of operations.

On June 29, 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted the laws on Employment Contracts, or the Employment Contract Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008, amended on December 28, 2012. The Employment Contract Law established new restrictions and increased costs for employers to dismiss employees, including specific provisions related to fixed- term employment contracts, temporary employment, probation, consultation with the labor union and employee assembly, employment without a contract, dismissal of employees, compensation upon termination and overtime work, and collective bargaining. According to the Employment Contract Law, an employer is obliged to sign a labor contract with an unlimited term with an employee if the employer continues to hire the employee after the expiration of two consecutive fixed-term labor contracts subject to certain conditions or after the employee has worked for the employer for ten consecutive years. The employer also has to pay compensation to an employee if the employer terminates an unlimited-term labor contract. Such compensation is also required when the employer refuses to renew a labor contract that has expired, unless it is the employee who refuses to extend the expired contract or resign. In addition, under the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and the Implementation Measures of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security on Paid Annual Leave for Employees of Enterprises, which became effective on September 18, 2008, employees who have served more than one year for an employer are entitled to a paid vacation ranging from 5 to 15 days, depending on their accumulative total length of service. Employers who fail to allow for such vacation time must compensate their employees three times their regular salaries for each vacation day disallowed, unless such employers can provide evidence, such as a copy of a written notice provided to their employees, that suggests the employers made arrangements for their employees to take such annual leaves, but such employees voluntarily waived taking their leaves or such employees waived their right to such vacation days in writing.

In addition, we are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pension insurance, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an employer has made adequate payments to the statutory employee benefits, and those employers who fail to make adequate payments may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to control our labor costs or pass on these increased labor costs, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Registered public accounting firms in China, including our independent registered public accounting firm, are not inspected by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which deprives us and our investors of the benefits of such inspection.

Auditors of companies whose shares are registered with the SEC, and traded publicly in the United States, including our independent registered public accounting firm, must be registered with the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and are required by the laws of the United States to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB to assess their compliance with the laws of the United States and professional standards applicable to auditors. Our independent registered public accounting firm is located in, and organized under the laws of, the PRC, which is a jurisdiction where the PCAOB, notwithstanding the requirements of U.S. law, is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the Chinese authorities. In May 2013, the PCAOB announced that it had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on Enforcement Cooperation with the CSRC and the PRC Ministry of Finance, which establishes a cooperative framework between the parties for the production and exchange of audit documents relevant to investigations undertaken by the PCAOB, CSRC or PRC Ministry of Finance in the United States and the PRC, respectively. The PCAOB continues to be in discussions with the CSRC and the PRC Ministry of Finance to permit inspections in the PRC of audit firms registered with the PCAOB and audit Chinese companies that trade on U.S. exchanges.

Inspections of other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. This lack of PCAOB inspections in China prevents the PCAOB from fully evaluating audits and quality control procedures of our independent registered public accounting firm. As a result, we and investors in our common stock are deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to PCAOB inspections, which could cause investors and potential investors in our stock to lose confidence in the audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our audited financial statements.

Our share price is highly volatile. Our shareholders may not be able to resell their ordinary shares at or above the price they initially paid for our shares, or at all.

The trading price of our shares has fluctuated significantly since our initial public offering in March 2000. Our share price could be subject to wide fluctuations in the future in response to many events or factors, including those discussed in the preceding risk factors relating to our operations, as well as:

General market conditions and domestic or international macroeconomic factors unrelated to our performance may also affect our share price. For these reasons, investors should not rely on recent trends to predict future share prices or financial results. Furthermore, following periods of volatility in a company’s securities, securities class action litigation against a company is sometimes instituted. We have experienced substantial costs and the diversion of management’s time and resources on this type of litigation and may do so in the future.

Some of our shareholders have significant influence over our management and affairs, which they could exercise against the best interests of our shareholders.

Entities affiliated with Tonghao (Cayman) Limited, or Tonghao, and the Smart Soho International Limited, or Smart Soho, and E-Town International Holding (Hong Kong) Co. Limited, or E-Town beneficially owned approximately 35%, 14%, and 11%, respectively, of our outstanding shares as of March 31, 2020. E-Town also has the right to designate a member of our board of directors. As a result, Tonghao, Smart Soho and E-Town have the ability to influence all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs. Matters that could require shareholder approval include:

This concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change of control or discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which could decrease the market price of our ordinary shares.

We may need additional capital, and the sale of additional ordinary shares or other equity securities could result in additional dilution to our shareholders.

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for the foreseeable future. We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If these resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities could result in

dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. It is uncertain whether financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

We are a “foreign private issuer,” and our disclosure obligations differ from those of U.S. domestic reporting companies. As a result, we may not provide you the same information as U.S. domestic reporting companies or we may provide information at different times, which may make it more difficult for you to evaluate our performance and prospects.

Under the Exchange Act, we as a foreign private issuer are subject to reporting obligations that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those of U.S. domestic reporting companies. For example, we are not required to issue quarterly reports or proxy statements. We are not required to disclose detailed individual executive compensation information. Furthermore, our directors and executive officers are not required to report equity holdings under Section 16 of the Exchange Act and are not subject to the insider short-swing profit disclosure and recovery regime.

As a foreign private issuer, we are also exempt from the requirements of Regulation FD (“Fair Disclosure”) which, generally, are meant to ensure that select groups of investors are not privy to specific information about an issuer before other investors. However, we are still subject to the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation rules of the SEC, such as Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act. Since many of the disclosure obligations imposed on us as a foreign private issuer differ from those imposed on U.S. domestic reporting companies, you should not expect to receive the same information about us and at the same time as the information provided by U.S. domestic reporting companies.

We are a Cayman Islands company and, because judicial precedent regarding the rights of shareholders may be more limited under Cayman Islands law than under U.S. law, you may have less protection of your shareholder rights than you would under U.S. law.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Cayman Islands Companies Law and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, the rights of minority shareholders to institute actions and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to our shareholders are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the latter of which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law may not be as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands have a different body of securities law than the United States. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action before the federal courts of the United States. As a result, our public shareholders may encounter more difficulty in protecting their interests against actions taken by the management, the board of directors or the controlling shareholders of our company than they would as shareholders of a public company incorporated in the United States.

We are a Cayman Islands company, and we conduct a significant portion of our operations in the PRC. Substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, some directors and officers are residents of countries other than the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to bring an action against our directors and officers in the United States. Even if you are successful in bringing an action, it may still be difficult for you to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors.

Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United States (and the Cayman Islands are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments other than, in certain circumstances, Australian judgments), a judgment obtained in such jurisdiction will be recognized and enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands at common law, without any re-examination of the merits of the underlying dispute, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment debt in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, provided such judgment (a) is given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction, (b) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given, (c) is final, (d) is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty; and (e) was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands.

We have incurred additional costs as a result of being a public company, which could negatively impact our net income and liquidity.

We are a public company listed in the United States and as such, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations implemented by the SEC and NASDAQ require significantly heightened corporate governance practices for public companies. As a result, we have incurred additional legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and many of our corporate activities have become time-consuming and costly. If we fail to comply with these rules and regulations, we could become the subject of a governmental enforcement action, investors may lose confidence in us and the market price of our ordinary shares could decline.

Our failure to timely file periodic reports with the SEC or satisfy the ongoing NASDAQ listing requirements could result in the delisting of our shares from the NASDAQ, affect the liquidity of our shares and cause us to default on covenants contained in contractual arrangements.

If we are unable to maintain compliance with the conditions for continued listing required by NASDAQ, then our ordinary shares may be subject to delisting from NASDAQ. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(a) (1) requires that our shares trade above $1.00 per share. Our shares traded below $1.00 for periods in 2012 and 2013, and on March 15, 2013 we received formal notice from NASDAQ that we were not in compliance with NASDAQ’s Listing Rules. While we returned to full compliance on April 11, 2013, our shares may trade below $1.00 per share again in the future. In addition, we failed to file our annual report on Form 20-F for 2016 on a timely basis, but regained compliance after filing such report in November 2017. If our ordinary shares are delisted from NASDAQ, our ordinary shares may not be eligible to trade on any national securities exchange or the over-the-counter market. If our ordinary shares are no longer traded through a market system, their liquidity may be greatly reduced, which could negatively affect their price. In addition, we may be unable to obtain future equity financing, or use our ordinary shares as consideration for mergers or other business combinations. A delisting from NASDAQ may also have other negative implications, including the potential loss of confidence by suppliers, customers and employees, the loss of institutional investor interest, and fewer business development opportunities and could lead to a default under certain of our contractual arrangements.

We believe that we will be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

As discussed more fully under “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-U.S. Federal Income Taxation,” we have been treating UTStarcom as a U.S. corporation for all purposes of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a result, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our worldwide income. In addition, if UTStarcom pays dividends to a Non-U.S. Holder, as defined in the discussion under the section “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-U.S. Federal Income Taxation,” we will be required to withhold U.S. income tax at the rate of 30%, or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable income tax treaty. Each investor should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax position of UTStarcom and the tax consequences of holding our shares.

UTStarcom, Inc. was originally incorporated in 1991 as a Delaware corporation. In April 2011, we were incorporated as UTStarcom Holdings Corp. as an exempted company under the laws of the Cayman Islands. On June 24, 2011, we effected the Merger to reorganize the corporate structure of UTStarcom, Inc., and its subsidiaries. The Merger resulted in the shares of common stock of UTStarcom, Inc. being converted into the right to receive an equal number of ordinary shares in our capital, which were issued by us in connection with the Merger. Following the Merger, UTStarcom, Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary and we became the parent company of UTStarcom, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The transaction was accounted for as a legal re-organization of entities under common control. See “Item 4. Information on the Company-C. Organizational Structure” for a listing of our subsidiaries. We, together with our subsidiaries, continue to conduct our business in substantially the same manner as was conducted by UTStarcom, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

On March 31, 2017, we received a preliminary non-binding proposal letter dated March 31, 2017 from Shah Capital Opportunity Fund LP, Himanshu H. Shah, Mr. Lu and his affiliates, and Tenling Ti, to acquire all of our outstanding shares not currently owned by them in a going private transaction for $2.15 per ordinary share in cash, subject to certain conditions. Our Board of Directors had formed a special committee consisting of two independent and disinterested directors, Sean Shao and Xiaoping Li to consider the proposal.

On October 24, 2017, the special committee of our board of directors received a notice from Shah Capital Opportunity Fund LP, Himanshu H. Shah, Hong Liang Lu and certain of his affiliates and Tenling Ti to withdraw the preliminary non-binding take-private proposal.

Our ordinary shares are traded on NASDAQ under the same ticker symbol “UTSI,” under which UTStarcom, Inc.’s common stock had previously traded. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at the offices of Maples Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. Our telephone number at this address is +1 (345) 949 8066. Our agent for service of process in the United States is CT Corporation System and its address is 208 LaSalle Ave, Suite 814, Chicago IL 60604, USA. Our principal executive offices are located at 4th Floor, South Wing, 368 Liuhe Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, P.R. China. We can be reached by telephone at ++86 571 8192 8888.

Our core business is providing next-generation broadband telecommunication network products, solutions and services. As a global telecom infrastructure provider, we focus on delivering innovative carrier-class packet optical, network synchronization and

broadband access (both Wireless and fixed line) products and solutions, coupled with Software Defined Networking (“SDN”) platform, optimized for mobile backhaul, metro aggregation, broadband access and value added services.

Our networking technologies enable access, aggregation and transports of high-speed data, voice and video. The product lines include Packet Transport Network (“PTN”), Packet Aggregation Network (“PAN”), Wireline Broadband Access including Multi-Services Access Network (“MSAN”) and Fiber To The X (“FTTx”), Carrier Wi-Fi solution and Software Defined Network (“SDN”) controller.

In addition to the well-established product lines mentioned above, which we sell to our customers worldwide, UTStarcom is actively involved in new products and solutions developments in several key target areas including mobile backhaul transport for 5G, network synchronization, intelligent networking platforms for retail and other applications. The new products and solutions utilize the experience and knowledge we have accumulated over the years in our key areas of expertise including optical communications, broadband access technologies, as well as hardware and software design.

We support full cycle in-house R&D and manufacturing equipped with advanced design, test and measurement tools. Our manufacturing is focused on production of high quality telecom equipment with comprehensive quality control process certified by LRQA for ISO9001/14001, OHSAS18001, QC080000, which results in very high equipment reliability. As a part of our efforts to support our customers on all stages of network planning, deployment and operation, we provide full range of pre- and post-sale services including turn-key deployments as may be required by our customers.

PTN product line is represented by NetRing Transport Network (“NetRing TN”) Series products that are based on the Multi-Protocol Label Switch Transport Profile (“MPLS-TP”) and Carrier Ethernet (“CE”) technologies, and includes a complete line of network nodes from compact metro access boxes to high-performance core devices. This product line combines packet switch/forwarding, packet optical transport and time/clock synchronization technologies to meet customers’ metro networking requirements through support of wide range of protocols, standards and interfaces including TDM (“SDH/SONET”), ATM, and Ethernet, coupled with highest reliability and carrier-class set of features. It is a highly flexible, reliable, scalable and cost-effective solution designed for efficient use in key applications such as mobile backhaul, multiservice metro aggregation, enterprise Carrier Ethernet services, and broadband access and aggregation. The product line offers a broad feature set, including network-wide time/clock synchronization, carrier class sub 50ms recovery resiliency, guaranteed Quality of Service (“QoS”) and Service Level Agreement (“SLA”) enforcement, end-to-end multi-layer Operation Administration & Maintenance (“OAM”), and a wide range of interfaces. Products are managed via a comprehensive centralized network management system, which allows customers to aggregate the management of large-scale networks up to 50,000 nodes. Large volumes of NetRing TN products have already been deployed worldwide. Due to introduction of NG-PTN and PAN products, most of demand from our customers in 2017-2018 shifted to these new products, resulting in large orders for high bandwidth devices with 100GE TN765, and various PAN products. At the same time, in 2017-2018 we continued seeing significant demand for mature PTN products including TN703 and TN705 from our existing customers, as well as demand for expansions. In 2019 we also shipped PTN products including TN701A, TN705E, TN703 and others to meet network expansion needs from our major customers.

The Next Generation Packet Transport Network (“NG-PTN”) portfolio offers some important improvements including high efficient hardware and software architecture, high port density, high speed 100GE interface, low power consumption and overall capital and operating expense savings. The TN765, higher layer aggregation / core platform of NG-PTN product line aims to help operators enhance profitability by extending capacity, throughput and deployment flexibility of MPLS-TP networks. It offers enhanced throughput of 1Tbps, multiple 100 GE interfaces and a large number of 10GE interfaces for more efficient network deployment. The growing demand for 100GE interface has been driving NG-PTN sales in recent years, including expansion orders for large number of TN765 products.

The Packet Aggregation Network (“PAN”) solution introduced in 2017 is based on technologies similar to PTN, but optimized for high-performance aggregation scenarios. The portfolio includes three products: TN703B (1RU rack-mountable, 8Gbps switching capacity), TN705B (4RU rack-mountable, 40Gbps switching capacity), TN725B (4RU rack-mountable, 80Gbps switching capacity). We shipped over 16,000 units of PAN products in 2017-2018 with follow-up orders in 2019, and we expect to see new deals involving PAN products in 2020-2021.

The SyncRing product family was specifically designed for highly accurate time and frequency synchronization over packet switched network based on PTP (IEEE1588v2) and Synchronous Ethernet technologies. The product family includes XGM Series grand master devices and XBC Series boundary clock switches centrally managed by our proven OMC-O NMS network management platform. The SyncRing solution is mainly aimed at mobile network operators due to its ability to meet the stringent synchronization accuracy requirements of LTE/LTE-A and 5G networks, as well as to meet lower TCO targets that are especially critical for the

swiftly growing segment of small cell deployments. The SyncRing product is designed for cluster distributed timing architecture to meet complex requirements of emerging 5G mobile technology.

In addition to existing SyncRing products XGM20 Grand Master (PRTC-A class T-GM) and XBC510 Boundary Clock (T-BC Class A) designed primarily for LTE/LTE-A applications, in 2018 we introduced PRTC-B class T-GM Grand Master product XGM30. Featuring significantly improved accuracy, higher availability, extended management capabilities, the XGM30 enables mobile network operators to cost-effectively meet the stringent time synchronization requirements of LTE/LTE-A and 5G networks. Furthermore, to better address the 4G/5G small cell deployments needs and to complete our cost-effective distributed clustered timing architecture, in 2019 we released 2 new products: SyncRing XBC340 and XBC341 Ethernet switches designed to play the role of highly accurate edge boundary clocks in a PTP IEEE1588v2 network. In addition to their excellent synchronization capabilities, both XBC340 and XBC341 support Power over Ethernet (PoE) output per IEEE 802.3at/af specifications on all of their electrical access ports, providing an excellent choice for efficient 4G/5G small cell deployment providing an “all-in-one” solution to support multiple functions (including synchronization, data forwarding and PoE functions).

In 2017-2018, the SyncRing solution was deployed in the LTE mobile network of one of the largest Mobile network operators (“MNO”) in Japan. It was one of the first commercial deployments of sync-over-packet solution on mobile networks in Japan, featuring large-scale deployment of XBC510 + XGM20. In 2019 we received large expansion orders and shipped SyncRing products to our customer. Following the launch of 5G technology and start of 5G networks rollout, we expect volume shipments of the 5G-ready XGM30 product and new XBC340 and XBC341 Boundary Clocks switches, as well as expansion orders from our customer for mature XGM20 and XBC510 products.

The SkyFlux advanced networking platform addresses the needs for service agility, automation and efficiency, and designed to provide an efficient solution for 4G/5G backhaul, high-volume traffic aggregation and provider edge scenarios, data center interconnect and others. The solution is based on the Source Routing technology that implements the paradigm of source routing. It is an excellent match for SDN-based control with centralized PCE enabling service agility and automation sought after by operators today: centralized intelligence with full network view and data analytics capabilities are seamlessly used to define optimal path at the source. Furthermore, this paradigm enables powerful network programming concept to turn networks into a fully programmable environment, enabling easy implementation of sophisticated scenarios such as traffic engineering, services chaining and more.

The SkyFlux advanced networking platform will provide support of high-speed interfaces up to 100GE/200GE/400GE, high port density, wide range of services including L2/L3VPN and EVPN, and of course will support full set of carrier-class features: sub-50ms protection, OAM, QoS, accurate time synchronization, hardware redundancy.

The first product in SkyFlux UAR Series, the SkyFlux UAR500 was announced available for POC in 2018. The product was one of the first SRv6-enabled products ever to pass interoperability testing in EANTC lab (Berlin). The SkyFlux UAR500 was also successfully demonstrated in several live demo events, including public live demo event during MPLS + SDN + NFV World Congress 2018 (Paris), as well as several demonstrations to our customers.

We are currently working on various enhancements of SkyFlux platform and its applications optimized first of all for 5G mobile networks Midhaul/Backhaul use cases that present a challenging set of requirements to the transport network. The SkyFlux enhancements include a number of technologies such as SPN (Slicing Packet Network) technology, Segment Routing MPLS implemented as SR-TP (Segment Routing Transport Profile) for carrier applications, FlexE – a light-weight TDM enhancement of Ethernet offering improved performance, flexibility and control over network resources, and high bandwidth support, all combined with SDN that together enable even greater network flexibility, excellent capacity and scalability, extra low latency, network slicing, and high timing accuracy all of which are essential characteristics of transport networks for 5G mobile technology. We are working with our customers to build the platform best suited for the needs of their applications.

UTStarcom offers a suite of products based on SDN technology combined in a SOOTM Network (Software-defined Open Packet Optical) solution which answers the needs of telecom operators for the next generation intelligent network, helping them to reduce capital expenditures and operating expenses, while enhancing overall network performance, availability and bandwidth efficiency and improving the customer experience. With SOO network operators gain unprecedented programmability, automation, and network control, which enables them to build highly scalable, flexible networks that readily adapt to changing business needs.

The solution successfully passed Proof of Concept (“PoC”) testing with major Tier-1 operators in Tokyo in 2015. We won few commercial contracts for the development of SDN key function modules. Two of them (Middleware Qx driver and service provisioning tool FMS automation) have successfully passed technical evaluation and field trial, and moved to commercial deployment in 2018. Another two key new function modules are Topology Resource Management (TRM) and Path Calculation Management (PCM). Development of both TRM and PCM modules has been completed and modules were provided to the customer

for testing. We also focusing on continuous in-house development and improvements of the fully-functional SDN Controller SOO Station R3.x for control and management of the SkyFlux advanced networking platform.

Our Carrier Wi-Fi product line includes a complete carrier-grade solution for a managed wireless access network: Wireless Access Controllers, Network Management System, and Wi-Fi Access Points (“AP”) for carrier and MSO markets and various deployment scenarios. Our Wireless Access Controllers portfolio provides a great scalable solution suited for different customers (“Carrier”, Enterprise) and different deployment scenarios. It includes the hardware-based MSG series of Wireless Access Controllers, and MSC-C cloud-based Wireless Access Controller featuring planning, configuration, control, as well as operation and maintenance functions implemented in the cloud.

We have successfully deployed carrier Wi-Fi solution since 2013. In 2016 we added support of the newest 802.11ac Wave 2 technology to our portfolio of Wireless Access Points implemented in UIA3340, UOA5340D, and other latest products. Growing demand from the India market resulted in the recent deployment of a large Carrier Wi-Fi network in two cities of India. In 2017, we shipped eight units of MSG2000 Wireless Access Controllers and about 10,000 Wireless Access Points for that project. In 2018 we had 2 more large wins including a large-scale rural public Wi-Fi hotspot network and a project for wireless internet connectivity in over 1000 gram panchayats (clusters of villages), which involves sizable amounts of products including Wi-Fi Access Points, Wireless Access Controllers, PoE Switches, as well as follow-up expansion orders in 2019. We expect to see strong demand for wireless broadband products from India and other markets in following years.

MSAN offers a wide range of services over twisted pair copper and optical fiber including IPTV, High-Speed Internet Access, POTS, VoIP. UTStarcom’s iAN Multimedia Network Edge is a leading MSAN platform with accumulated over 40 million lines installed worldwide. The latest iAN platform-iAN1200 series MSAN portfolio accommodates carrier-grade broadband access, telephony and data service, and supports a range of technologies such as POTS, ADSL/ADSL2/ADSL2+, VDSL2, SHDSL (EFM) which allows service providers to serve highly interactive and bandwidth intensive applications, enabling operators to offer value added “Triple Play” and broadband business services and migration to NGN while maintaining the traditional telephony services. The MSAN B1200 product line includes high (iAN B1205F), medium (iAN B1205E) and low (iAN B1205) capacity devices acting act as a traditional TDM based DLC, IPDSLAM, Media Gateway platform integrated into a single device and supports seamless migration from V5/AN to VoIP/AG and IMS Access.

The MSAN B1200 Series products were widely deployed and expanded since 2015 to 2017, with shipments accumulating to about 1 Million ports. Driven by strong NGN (Next Generation Network) deployment needs from India, we received in 2018 large orders for MSAN products and related installation and integration services, with total volume over 4 Million subscriber ports, followed by expansion orders in 2019. We expect to see continued demand for MSAN products moving forward in 2020 and beyond.

Another integral part of our Wireline Broadband Access portfolio – GPON FTTx solution that combines the simplicity of Ethernet services with high durability of passive optical components, ensuring lower operating expense (OPEX) for service providers. Our carrier-class FTTx solution is represented by a range of OLT and ONT products designed for delivery of high-speed voice, data and video services to residential and business subscribers. We saw a growing demand for FTTx in our key broadband market in India recently that resulted in an order received in 2019 for a very large number of ONT products from our key customer in India.

UTStarcom leverages its cutting-edge information and communication technologies to develop intelligent networking platforms optimized for some target verticals and market segments, such as smart retail and intelligent broadband. UTStarcom’s Smart Retail solution includes centralized cloud-based intelligence and operation, and local hardware-based goBox control gateway in a next generation vending machine, commercial refrigerator or a smart cabinet that enables connectivity to the cloud, and serves as a central point to integrate sensing, payment, security and value-added services like advertising. Although in 2018 we supplied certain quantity of goBox products to our customers in China and fulfilled expansion orders in 2019, the Company has reassessed this solution as a less promising business and will discontinue this product line in 2020.

The table below describes net sales by geographic region for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

	Years Ended December 31,
			% of net					% of net					% of net
	2019		Sales			2018		sales			2017		sales
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Net Sales by Region
China	$	2,439		4	%	$	3,146		3	%	$	2,926	3	%
India		37,206		57	%		70,106		60	%		42,352	43	%
Japan		21,761		33	%		35,504		31	%		49,185	50	%
Taiwan		3,515		5	%		6,445		6	%		3,018	3	%
Other		702		1	%		743		1	%		811	1	%
Total	$	65,623	100		%	$	115,944	100		%	$	98,292	100	%

Our products and services are used primarily in Asia. In 2019 and 2018, India was the largest market. In 2019, 2018, and 2017, India represented 57%, 60% and 43% of our net sales, respectively. Japan was one of our largest markets, representing 33%, 31% and 50% of our net sales in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Our key target geographical markets for the deployment of our broadband infrastructure products are India, Japan, and other Asia Pacific markets. We believe these geographical markets provide a significant opportunity given their relatively low broadband penetration rates and strong consumer demand for new broadband services. We observe consistently high interest in our products in the India market, and see potential for growth there for many of our product lines including optical transport and aggregation, fixed and wireless broadband access. We expect more upgrade projects and new deployments to expand our market share for broadband Internet network equipment in India.

Our customers, typically telecommunications and cable service providers, enable delivery of wireless, wire line and broadband access services including data, voice, and/or television to their subscribers. They include, but are not limited to, local, regional, national and international telecommunications carriers, including broadband, cable, Internet, wire line and wireless providers. Telecommunications and cable service providers typically require extensive proposal review, product certification, test and evaluation and network design and, in most cases, are associated with long sales cycles. Our customers’ networking requirements are influenced by numerous variables, including their size, the number and types of subscribers that they serve, the relative tele-density (the number of phone lines per 100 persons) of the geography served, their subscriber demand for IP communications and access services in the served geography. A significant portion of our net sales is derived from a Japanese customer, Softbank, which is also one of our former shareholders. In 2019, our net sales to Softbank totaled approximately $13.5 million, representing approximately 21% of our total net sales. In 2018, our net sales to Softbank totaled approximately $31.9 million, representing approximately 28% of our total net sales. We anticipate that our dependence on Softbank will continue for the foreseeable future. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business- We rely on a Japanese customer and an Indian customer for a significant portion of our net sales. Any deterioration of our relationship or any interruption to our ongoing collaboration with this customer may significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.” Another significant portion of our net sales is derived from an India customer, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (“BSNL”). In 2019, our net sales to BSNL totaled approximately $31.8 million, representing approximately 48% of our total net sales. In the third quarter of 2019, BSNL delayed payment on a large receivable. We have received partial payment at the end of 2019, and every month in 2020 through April 2020. In 2018, our net sales to BSNL totaled approximately $67.0 million, representing approximately 58% of our total net sales. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business.”

We compete in the telecommunications equipment market, providing IP-based core infrastructure products, and services for transporting data, voice and television traffic across IP-based networks. The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid change, converging technologies, and a migration to IP-based networking and communications solutions that offer relative advantages to our customers and their subscribers. These market factors represent a competitive threat to UTStarcom. We compete with numerous vendors in each product and market category. The overall number of our competitors providing new products and solutions may

increase. Also, the composition of competitors may change as we increase our activity in various technology markets. In particular, we have experienced price-focused competition from competitors in Asia, and we anticipate this will continue.

We believe our competitive strengths are derived from three main factors: our ability to introduce and deploy well-developed IP- based technologies and products; our reputation for providing a customer-centric business model; and our ability to solve complex problems. Our competitive disadvantages include our relatively smaller size in terms of revenues, working capital, and financial resources and headcount; our lack of historical sales to many of the largest carriers in well-established markets and our lack of consumer brand recognition in markets.

The broadband infrastructure market is subject to intense competition worldwide from numerous global and regional competitors, including some of the world’s largest companies. These companies leverage pricing, payment terms and their pre-existing customer relationships. Specific competitors in this segment include Cisco, Juniper, Nokia, Alcatel-Lucent, Coriant, CIENA Corporation, ECI Telecom, Huawei Technologies, and ZTE Corporation.

We pursue a direct sales and marketing strategy in Japan, India, and South Asia, targeting sales to telecommunications operators and equipment distributors with closely associated customers. We maintain sales and customer support sites in Japan and India. Our customer service operations in Hangzhou and Chengdu China, serve as both a technical resources and liaisons to our product development organization.

Additionally, we maintain our Sales and Marketing presence in the United States, through our subsidiary, Virtual Gateway Labs, Inc. in Silicon Valley, to market and support our products and services in this key target market.

The manufacturing operations consist of circuit board assembly, final system assembly, software installation and testing. We assemble circuit boards primarily using surface mount technology. Assembled boards are individually tested prior to final assembly and tested again at the system level prior to system shipment. We use internally developed functional and parametric tests for quality management and process control and have developed an internal system to track quality statistics at a serial number level. System final testing and packaging are conducted at our own facilities as well as contracted to third parties.

We believe it is essential to continue to develop and introduce new and enhanced products if we are to maintain our competitive position. While we use competitive analyses and technology trends as factors in our product development plans, the primary input for new products and product enhancements comes from soliciting and analyzing information about service providers’ needs. We have been able to cost-effectively hire highly skilled technical employees from a large pool of qualified candidates in China. We also have a development center in India to take advantage of the talent pool available there, and to support our operations in India. Our R&D centers are ISO 9001-2000 certified.

In the past we have made, and expect to continue to make, significant investments in research and development. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 our R&D expenses totaled $14.5 million, $12.7 million, and $9.9 million, respectively. The continuous increase in 2019, 2018 and 2017 were primarily due to continuing investment in product development and new technology.

Our ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements and licensing arrangements, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. In addition, we have, from time to time, chosen to abandon previously filed applications. Patents may not be issued and any patents issued may not cover the scope of the claims sought in the applications. Additionally, issued patents may be found to be invalid or unenforceable in the courts of those countries where we hold or have filed for such patents or patent applications. Our U.S. patents do not afford any intellectual property protection in China or other international jurisdictions. Additionally, patents that we hold in countries other than the United States do not afford any intellectual property protection in the United States. Please refer to the discussion of risks associated with our intellectual property in “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We may be unable to adequately protect against the loss or misappropriation of our intellectual property, which could substantially harm our business.”

Although we experience some seasonality typical of the telecommunications industry, our revenues and earnings have not demonstrated consistent seasonal characteristics. In contrast, our results of operation are generally impacted more significantly by factors such as customer concentration and the timing of revenue recognition.

We source and purchase components comprising of active and passive electronic parts, mechanical and electrical parts, OEM and third party parts in the open markets from China and overseas. Prices for these component parts typically vary with the global and local supply and demand dynamics as well as raw material price fluctuations. Component part price volatility is also affected by one-off events such as the earthquake in Japan and flooding in Thailand resulting in short-term electronic component and hard drive shortages respectively. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business.”

Multiple government bodies are involved in regulating and administering affairs in the telecommunications and information technology industries in China, Japan and India, among which the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (“MIIT”), NDRC, SASAC and State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television (“SAPPRFT”) play the leading roles. These government agencies have broad discretion and authority over all aspects of the telecommunications and information technology industry in China, including but not limited to, setting the telecommunications tariff structure, granting carrier licenses and frequencies, approving equipment and products, granting product licenses, approving of the form and content of transmitted data, specifying technological standards as well as appointing carrier executives, all of which may impact our ability to do business in China. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Conducting Business in China.”

The following table sets forth our subsidiaries, including their country of incorporation or residence and our ownership interest in such subsidiaries.

	Place of
	Incorporation or	Proportion of
Name	Organization	Ownership Interest
UTStarcom, Inc.	U.S.A	100	%
UTStarcom International Products, Inc.	U.S.A	100	%
Issanni Communications, Inc.	U.S.A	100	%
UTStarcom Telecom Co., Ltd.	China	100	%
UTStarcom Hong Kong Ltd.	Hong Kong SAR	100	%
UTStarcom Japan KK	Japan	100	%
UTStarcom, S.A. de C.V.	Mexico	100	%
UTStarcom Taiwan Ltd.	Taiwan	100	%
UTStarcom Network Solutions—Redes de Nova Geraçăo Ltda.	Brazil	100	%
UTStarcom India Telecom Pvt	India	100	%
UTStarcom (Thailand) Limited	Thailand	100	%
MyTV Corporation	Cayman Island	100	%
UTStarcom (Philippines), Inc.	Philippines	100	%
UTStarcom Hong Kong Investment Holding Ltd.	Hong Kong SAR	100	%
Virtual Gateway Labs, Inc.	U.S.A	100	%
Hangzhou USTAR Technologies Ltd.	China	100	%

Our principal executive offices are located in Hangzhou, China. Our research and development, manufacturing and back office functions are located at our office facilities in Hangzhou, China.

In July 2016, we entered into a new non-cancellable lease agreement for our office facilities in Hangzhou, China, and later we expanded the lease area with the same landlord. Under the term of these lease agreements, we have leased 16,872 square meters (approximately 181,610 square feet) of gross floor area, through July 31, 2021. In addition, we lease 1,848 square feet of properties in

North America. We lease sales and customer support offices in several countries covering Japan, India, and the United States. We believe our facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current needs.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the periods specified and their related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, as well as “Item 3. Key Information-A. Selected Financial Data.” This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or future strategies that are signified by the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” or similar language. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. In evaluating our business, you should carefully consider the information provided under “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors.” Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We caution you that our businesses and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties.

We are a global telecom infrastructure provider dedicated to developing technology that will serve the rapidly growing demand for bandwidth from cloud-based services, mobile, streaming and other applications. We work with carriers globally, from Asia to the Americas, to meet this demand through a range of innovative broadband packet optical transport and wireless/fixed-line access products and solutions. We focus on delivering innovative carrier-class broadband transport and access products and solutions, optimized for mobile backhaul, metro aggregation, broadband access and Wi-Fi data offloading. Collectively, our range of solutions is designed to expand and modernize telecommunications networks through smooth network system integration, lower operating costs and increased broadband access. We also provide the carriers with increased revenue opportunities by enhancing their subscribers’ user experience. The majority of our business is based in Japan, India, China and other Asian markets.

We differentiate ourselves with products designed to reduce network complexity, integrate high performance capabilities and allow a simple transition to next generation networks. We design our products to facilitate cost-effective and efficient deployment, maintenance and upgrades.

Our customers can easily integrate our products, which are IP-based, with other industry standard hardware and software. Additionally, we believe we can introduce new features and enhancements that can be cost-effectively added to our customers’ existing networks. IP-based devices can be changed or upgraded in modules, saving our customers the expense of replacing their entire system installation. Our strategic priorities are summarized as follows:

On March 28, 2018, we became an investor of Hangzhou uSTAR Technologies Limited, or (“uSTAR”), a newly established joint venture (“JV”) Company, and invested $1.8 million to acquire 49% of uSTAR’s equity interest and used the equity method to account for this investment.

In December 2018, we invested an additional $1.9 million to purchase the remaining interest of uSTAR from our JV partner. After that transaction, we own 100% equity interest of uSTAR and we consolidate uSTAR from the acquisition date. We assessed the fair value of all the assets and liabilities in uSTAR and concluded there was no Goodwill occurred during the transaction.

During the period between March 2018 to the date we acquired control of uSTAR, we recorded $0.4 million equity loss in connection with uSTAR.

In October 2004, we invested $3.0 million in Series D preferred convertible stock of GCT Semiconductor, Inc., or GCT, which designs, develops and markets integrated circuit products for the wireless communications industry. This investment represents approximately a 0.4% interest in GCT. This investment is accounted for using the cost method. We assess the fair value at every year-end. In 2012 and 2016, we recorded $2.1 million and $0.8 million investment impairment, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, the book value of the investment was zero.

On October 16, 2010, we invested $ 30.0 million in UiTV Media Inc., or (“UiTV”), $10.0 million of which was paid by our common shares that we had the repurchase rights and $20.0 million of which was paid by cash. We recorded this transaction as an acquisition because we then owned 75% interests in UiTV and had effective control. The transactions closed on November 8, 2010. On April 15, 2012, we then exercised our repurchase right, which trigged deconsolidation of UiTV from our consolidated financial statements starting from June 21, 2012 because we lost effective control due to our ownership decreasing from 75% to 49% and we lost one seat on the board of directors. Thereafter we recorded this investment using the equity method. From December 3, 2012 to December 31, 2015, we purchased $35.1 million convertible bonds that bear interest at 6.5% per annum with various maturity dates and subsequently all maturity dates were extended to December 31, 2015. In 2013 and 2014, we recorded a total of $9.6 million and $5.3 million, respectively, in losses for the preferred stock investment to reflect our 49% interest in UiTV losses. After the preferred shares was reduced to zero, we start to record 100% UiTV losses against our convertible bond investment balance until the carrying value of the convertible bond investment balance was reduced to zero. Therefore, in 2014 and 2015, we recorded $3.6 million and $14.0 million, respectively, in losses to reflect 100% of UiTV losses. Additionally, at every year-end, we assess the fair value of the UiTV, and recorded impairment charges of $9.1 million, $2.4 million and $6.0 million in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. The convertible bond investments balance was reduced to zero as of December 31, 2015.

In December 2010, we invested $2.1 million into Aceland Investments Limited (“Aceland”). In the second quarter of 2011, we extended a shareholder loan to Aceland in the amount of $7.1 million with a maturity date of December, 31, 2015. We owned an approximately 35% interest in Aceland and accounted for the investment in Aceland using the equity method. In 2015, we recorded a $1.0 million impairment charge to the Aceland investment. In 2016, we received $6.7 million cash from Aceland as partial repayment of the loan balance and realized a $1.0 million gain of foreign exchange. In 2017 and 2018, we realized a $0.2 million and $0.3 million equity loss, respectively, as a result of the depreciation of the US Dollar deposit. In October 2019, the Board of Aceland approved a resolution to reduce its shares capital and was expected to repurchase our full investment in Aceland within one year. As the result, we classified this investment as a trading security in the short-term investment account in the amount of $2.1 million at December 31, 2019. In March 2020, Aceland repurchased all our investment and we recorded a $0.3 million gain in the other income.

On August 31, 2012, we completed the sale of our IPTV business to UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd. which is controlled by our former Chief Executive Officer. On the same day, we purchased a $20.0 million Convertible Bond from UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd. which bears interest at 6.5% per annum and matured on August 31, 2017. On April 7, 2015, we entered an agreement with UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd. for the conversion of the $20.0 million Convertible Bond. Pursuant to the agreement, UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd. paid $10.0 million in cash to us as partial repayment of the principal of the Convertible Bond. The remaining principal and interest of the Convertible Bond were converted to 14% of equity interest of UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd. We used the cost method to account for this investment. During 2015, we assessed the fair value of UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd, and recorded a $6.5 million impairment charge on this investment. We assessed the fair value of UTStarcom Hong Kong Holdings Ltd, and recorded an impairment of $0, $0.4 million and $0 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respective. As of December 31, 2019, the book value of this investment was $3.1 million.

In November 2012, we invested $8.0 million in Series B Preferred Stock of AioTV Inc, (“AioTV”), representing a 44% equity interest of AioTV. The Preferred Stock was classified as available-for-sale security as it was not considered to be in-substance common stock due to the redemption feature. In December 2015 and October 2016, we invested in a convertible bond of $0.5 million that matured on March 28, 2017 and of $0.3 million that matured on October 7, 2017, respectively. All convertible bonds bear interest at 10.0% per annum. During 2016, we assessed the fair value of the investment, and recorded a $4.3 million impairment charge relating to this investment. On May 30, 2017, we converted all the existing Preferred Shares of AioTV into common shares of AioTV, and converted $0.5 million convertible bond issued in December 2015 into common shares of AioTV. After this conversion, we deemed that we have significant influence in AioTV and began to use the equity method to account for the investment in AioTV. On the same day, we signed a “Note Purchase Agreement” with AioTV. Pursuant to the agreement, the valuation cap of AioTV was reduced to $0.16 million, and we promised to purchase a $0.8 million convertible promissory note including $0.32 million of existing convertible bond issued in October 2016. As the result of these transactions, we recorded $1.3 million investment impairment in the second quarter of 2017. We invested $0.1 million and $0.38 million in the second and third quarter of 2017, respectively, in the convertible promissory note. In the third quarter of 2017, we recorded $0.1 million in losses for the common stock investment to reflect our 45% share of AioTV’s losses. After the common stock was reduced to zero, we started and will continued to record our 45% share of AioTV’s losses against our convertible promissory note until the carrying value of the convertible promissory note investment balance is reduced to zero. In the third and fourth quarters of 2017, we recorded $0.2 million and $0.2 million respectively in losses to reflect our 45% share of AioTV’s losses. At 2017 year-end, we assessed the fair value of AioTV, and concluded that a $0.4 million impairment charge to this investment was necessary. As of December 31, 2017, the book value of this investment was

zero. On December 19, 2018, we entered into the assignment and assumption agreement to transfer the Company’s all equity interests and debt interests in AioTV to a third party for cash consideration of $1 by the buyer. This transaction closed on April 11, 2019.

Our financial condition and results of operations are based on certain critical accounting policies and estimates, which include judgments, estimates and assumptions on the part of management. Estimates are based on historical experience, knowledge of economic and market factors and various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The following summary of critical accounting policies and estimates highlights those areas of significant judgment in the application of our accounting policies that affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Effective January 1, 2018, we recognize revenues in accordance with Accounting Standard Update ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), as amended. ASU 2014-09 was codified in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as topic 606 (“ASC 606”). The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. To determine the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized for arrangements determined to be within the scope of ASU 2014-09, for each customer contract, we performed the following five steps:

We account for a contract with a customer that is within the scope of ASC 606 when all of the following criteria are met: (i) the arrangement has been approved by the parties and the parties are committed to perform their respective obligations, (ii) each party's rights regarding the goods or services to be transferred can be identified, (iii) the payment terms for the goods or services to be transferred can be identified, (iv) the arrangement has commercial substance and (v) collection of substantially all of the consideration to which the Company will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to the customer is probable.

Performance obligations promised in a contract are identified based on the services and the products that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available from third parties or from us, and are distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the services and the products is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. Our performance obligations consist of (i) sales of communication equipment with embedded software, (ii) provision of installation and commission service, and (iii) provision of annual maintenance service. The software component is not considered distinct as the software component is integral to the functionality of the communication equipment.

The transaction price is determined based on the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring services to the customer. Some sales agreements have performance guarantees covering a certain timeframe. If there is an underperformance event, we may incur liquidation damages as a percentage of the total purchase price. Such performance guarantees represent a form of variable consideration and are estimated at the contact inception at the best estimate and updated at the end of each reporting period as additional performance data becomes available and only to the extent that it is probably that a significant reversal of any revenue will not occur. Variable consideration includes estimates for sales credits, which are based on historical level and specific criteria outlined in the sales contracts, and other factors known at the time. We generally invoice customers for equipment and services upon meeting certain milestones. Customer invoices are generally due within 30 to 90 days after issuance. Our contracts with customers typically do not include significant financing components as the period between the transfer of performance obligations and timing of payment are generally within one year.

We allocate the transaction price based on the estimated standalone selling price. We develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the standalone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. We utilize key assumptions to determine the standalone selling price, which may include other comparable transactions, pricing considered in negotiating the transaction and the estimated costs. Certain variable consideration is allocated specifically to one or more performance obligations in a contract when the terms of the variable consideration relate to the satisfaction of the performance obligation and the resulting amounts allocated to each performance obligation are consistent with the amounts the Company would expect to receive for satisfying each performance obligation.

Revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services at an amount that reflects the

consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. For performance obligations, we utilize judgment to assess the nature of combined performance obligation determine whether a performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time.

Revenue from sales of communication equipment is recognized at a point in time, which is generally upon delivery. Revenue from provision of installation and commission service is recognized at a point in time when the service is completed. Revenue from provision of annual maintenance services is recognized over time on a ratable basis over the contract term.

At the inception of each arrangement, we determine if the arrangement is a lease or contains an embedded lease and review the facts and circumstances of the arrangement to classify lease assets as operating or finance leases under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases Topic 842 (“ASU 2016-02”).

We lease office space under operating lease agreements with initial lease terms up to five years. We have entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for our offices. The leases have original lease periods expiring between 2019 to 2023 and some of these lease agreements have options to extend the lease terms for an additional period subject to mutual negotiations and agreements with the lessors. We considered all renewal options that were reasonably certain to be exercised and are considered in determining the lease term at the inception of the lease.

We measures lease liabilities based on the present value of the total remaining lease payments. To determine the present value of future minimum lease payments, we used the implicit rate when readily determinable. When the implicit rate is not available, we applies its incremental borrowing rate, which is the estimated rate we would be required to pay for a collateralized borrowing equal to the total lease payments over the term of the lease. We estimates our incremental borrowing rate based on an analysis of publicly traded debt securities of companies with credit and financial profiles similar to our own.

We account for our restructuring plans using the guidance provided in ASC 420 “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” and ASC 712 “Compensation-Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” We account for litigation and contingencies in accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies”, which requires that we record an estimated loss from a loss contingency when information available prior to issuance of our financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.

Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted is determined based on the grant-date fair value. Stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock awards is measured based on the closing fair market value of our ordinary share on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options is estimated at the grant date based on each option’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes option pricing model, or Black-Scholes model. Stock-based compensation is expensed ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting term of the share-based payment awards. The performance-based restricted stock units are subject to the attainment of goals determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. We record the relevant stock-based compensation for the performance-based restricted stock units based on the probability of meeting the performance conditions.

Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards require the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected term of the share-based payment awards and stock volatility. We estimate an expected term of options granted based on our historical exercise and cancellation data for vested options. We use historical volatility as management believes it is more representative of future stock price trends than implied volatility due to the relatively small number of actively traded options on our ordinary shares available to determine implied volatility. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded in the current period.

We account for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services following the provisions of ASC 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (formerly FASB Staff Positions Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18 and 00-18). The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

We provide a warranty on our equipment for a period generally ranging from one to two years from the time of final acceptance. At times, we have entered into arrangements to provide limited warranty services for periods longer than two years. We provide for the expected cost of product warranties at the time that revenue is recognized based on an assessment of past warranty experience and when specific circumstances dictate. We assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liability every quarter and make adjustments to the liabilities if necessary. Specific warranty accruals are reversed upon the expiration of the warranty period and are recorded as reduction of cost of sales. From time to time, we may be subject to additional costs related to non-standard warranty claims from our customers. If and when this occurs, we estimate additional accruals based on historical experience, communication with our customers and various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such additional warranty accruals are recorded in the period in which the additional costs are identified.

Although we evaluate customer credit worthiness prior to a sale, we provide an allowance for doubtful accounts for the estimated loss on trade and notes receivable when collection may no longer be reasonably assured. We assess collectability of receivables based on a number of factors including analysis of creditworthiness, our customer’s historical payment history and current economic conditions, our ability to collect payment and on the length of time an individual receivable balance is outstanding. Our policy for determining the allowance for doubtful accounts includes both specific allowances for balances known to be uncollectible and a formula-based portfolio approach, based on aging of the accounts receivable, as a precursor to a management review of the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. This formula-based approach involves aging of our accounts receivable and applying a percentage based on our historical experience, and results in the allowance being computed based on the aging of the receivables. We evaluate the percentages applied to each category of aged accounts receivable periodically based on actual history of write-offs and collections and refine this formula-based approach accordingly for use in future periods. Receivable balances are written-off when we have sufficient evidence to indicate that they are uncollectible.

Inventories consist of product held at our manufacturing facility and warehouses, as well as finished goods at customer sites for which the customer has taken possession, but based on specific contractual terms, title has not yet passed to the customer. We may ship inventory to existing customers that require additional equipment to expand their existing networks prior to the signing of an expansion contract. Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, based on the FIFO method of accounting. Reserves are based on our assumptions about future market conditions and customer demand, including projected changes in average selling prices resulting from competitive pricing pressures. We continually monitor inventory valuation for potential losses and obsolete inventory at our manufacturing facilities as well as at customer sites. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional reserves may be required. If actual market conditions are more favorable than anticipated, inventory previously reserved may be sold to customers, resulting in lower cost of sales and higher income from operations than expected in that period.

Deferred costs is the unamortized cost of post-contract customer support over a period of time of certain legacy contracts and we amortize the deferred revenue and related costs of goods sold over the post-contract support period.

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining the provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We recognize the tax benefit (expense) from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. We recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as part of the provision for income taxes.

We recognize deferred income taxes as the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial statement amounts based on enacted tax rates. Management judgment is required in the assessment of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets based on its assessment of projected taxable income. Numerous factors could affect our results of operations in the future. If there is a significant decline in our future operating results, management’s assessment of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets would need to be revised, and any such adjustment to our deferred tax assets would be charged to income in that period. If necessary, we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount which management believes is more likely than not to be realized. Changes in estimates of taxable income in the future could result in reversal of the valuation allowances which would be credited to income in the year of reversal.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “Cares Act”) became law in the United States to provide certain tax incentives with the aim of mitigate the related economic harm for businesses. We are currently evaluating the benefit these tax incentives might have on the consolidated financial statements.

Our investments consist principally of bank notes, debt and equity securities classified as available for sale and cost and equity investment in privately held companies. The investments in equity securities of privately held companies in which we hold less than 20% voting interest and on which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for under ASC 325, “ Investments-Other” using the cost method. Under the cost method, these investments are carried at cost less impairment, if any. The investments in equity securities of privately held companies in which we hold at least 20% but less than 50% voting interests, and on which we have the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for under ASC 323, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures” using the equity method. Investments in debt securities that are classified as available for sale are measured at fair value on the balance sheets under ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. Unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities (including those classified as current assets) will be excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income until realized except as indicated in the following paragraph.

We recognize an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. In making this determination, we review several factors to determine whether the losses are other-than-temporary, including but not limited to: (i) the length of time the investment was in an unrealized loss position, (ii) the extent to which fair value was less than cost, (iii) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and (iv) our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The determination of fair value of the investment involves considering factors such as current economic and market conditions, the operating performance of the companies including current earnings trends and forecasted cash flows, and other company and industry specific information. Investment impairments recorded as other-than-temporary were nil, $0.4 million, and $1.7 million, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. Long-lived assets that are to be disposed of by sale are measured at the lower of book value or fair value less cost to sell.

Advances from customers represent cash received from customers before revenue recognition for the purchase of the Company’s products.

See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 18 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on results of operations and financial condition, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The comparison of 2018 and 2017 financials position and results of operations and related discussions was in “Item 5—Results of Operations” included in the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2018 on the form of 20-F, which was not incorporated in this annual report.

	Years Ended December 31,
			% of					% of
			net					net
Sales by Segment	2019		sales			2018		sales
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Equipment	$	43,722	67		%	$	97,680	84	%
Services		21,901	33		%		18,264	16	%
Total	$	65,623	100		%	$	115,944	100	%
Net Sales by Region
China	$	2,439		4	%	$	3,146	3	%
India		37,206		57	%		70,106	60	%
Japan		21,761		33	%		35,504	31	%
Taiwan		3,515		5	%		6,445	6	%
Other		702		1	%	743		1	%
Total	$	65,623	100		%	$	115,944	100	%

Net sales decreased by 43.4% to $65.6 million for 2019 as compared to $115.9 million for 2018.

Sales from equipment were $43.7 million for 2019, a decrease of $54.0 million compared to $97.7 million for 2018. The decrease was mainly due to the completion of projects in India, which contributed a significant amount of revenue in the prior year period.

Sales from services were $21.9 million for 2019, an increase of $3.6 million compared to $18.3 million during 2018. The increase was primarily contributed from service maintenance revenue from India.

		Years Ended December 31,
Cost of				% of				% of
Sales by				net				net
Segment		2019		sales		2018		sales
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Equipment		$	29,566	68	%	$	72,082	74	%
Services			11,900	54	%		11,594	63	%
Total		$	41,466	63	%	$	83,676	72	%

Cost of sales consists primarily of material and labor costs associated with manufacturing, assembly and testing of products, costs associated with installation and customer training, warranty costs, fees to agents, inventory and contract loss provisions and overhead. Cost of sales also includes import taxes and tariffs on components and assemblies.

Cost of sales was $41.5 million, or 63% of net sales for 2019 compared to $83.7 million, or 72% of net sales, for 2018. The cost of sales percentage in 2019 was a slight lower due to increased percentages of total sales in Japan where the margin was higher.

Cost of sales from equipment was $29.6 million, or 68% of net sales, for 2019, compared to $72.1 million, or 74% of net sales for 2018.

Cost of sales from services were $11.9 million, or 54% of net sales, for 2019, compared to $11.6 million, 63% of net sales for 2018.

	Years Ended December 31,
			Gross					Gross
			Profit					Profit
Gross profit by Segment	2019		%			2018		%
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Equipment	$	14,156		32	%	$	25,598	26	%
Services		10,001		46	%		6,670	37	%
Total	$	24,157		37	%	$	32,268	28	%

Our gross profit has been affected by changes in average selling prices, material costs, product mix, the impact of warranty charges and contract loss provisions, as well as inventory reserve. Our gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, varies among our product families. We expect that our overall gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, will fluctuate in the future as a result of shifts in product mix and stages of the product life cycle.

Gross profit was $24.2 million, or 37% of net sales, for 2019, compared to $32.3 million, or 28% of net sales, for 2018.

Sales of equipment had a gross profit of $14.2 million, with a gross profit margin of 32%, for 2019, as compared to a gross profit of $25.6 million, with a gross profit margin of 26% for 2018. The increase in gross margin in 2019 was due to a higher percentage of total sales from Japan where the margin was higher.

Sales of service earned a gross profit of $10.0 million, or 46% of net sales of Services for 2019, compared to gross profit of $6.7 million, or 37% for 2018. The increase was primarily due to service product mix.

		Years Ended December 31,
				% of
				net				% of net
		2019		sales		2018		sales
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Selling, general and administrative		$	15,827	24	%	$	15,156	13	%
Research and development			14,467	22	%		12,745	11	%
Total operating expenses		$	30,294	46	%	$	27,901	24	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, include compensation and benefits, professional fees, sales commissions, provision for doubtful accounts receivable and travel and entertainment costs. Research and development, or R&D, expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits of employees engaged in research, design and development activities, cost of parts for prototypes, related equipment depreciation and third party development expenses. We believe that continued and prudent investment in R&D is critical to our long-term success, and we continue to evaluate appropriate investment levels.

SG&A expenses were $15.8 million for 2019, an increase of 4.4 %, or $0.7 million, as compared to $15.2 million for 2018. The increase was mainly attributable to a higher account receivable allowance provided during the period for our India customer, partially offset by the decreased expenses from continued tight cost controls.

R&D expenses were $14.5 million in 2019, an increase of 13.5%, or $1.7 million, compared to $12.7 million in 2018. The increase was due to our continuing investment in 5G technology and product development.

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense in our consolidated statement of operations:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018
	(in thousands)
Cost of net sales	$	136	$	66
Selling, general and administrative	985		901
Research and development	278		130
Total	$	1,399	$	1,097

As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $1.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, as measured, related to unvested stock options and restricted stock and restricted stock units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.69 years.

Stock-based compensation expense was $1.4 million in 2019, increasing 27.5%, or $0.3 million, compared to $1.1 million in 2018. The increase was primarily due to higher employee participation in 2018 and 2019.

Interest income was $1.3 million and $1.7 million for 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease in interest income for 2019 was a result of decreasing amount of cash and cash equivalents.

Interest expense was $0.1 million and $0.1 million for 2019 and 2018, respectively. The change in interest expense for 2019 as compared to 2018 was immaterial.

Other income, net was $0.9 million for 2019 and primarily consisted of a $3.2 million gain from reversal of an aged account payable balance and a $1.2 million gain from the reversal of FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45 reserve due to expiration of a statute of limitations, partially offset by a $3.9 million unrealized loss on foreign exchange.

Other expense, net was $0.6 million for 2018 and primarily consisted of a $2.6 million loss on foreign exchange, a $0.5 million gain from reversal of water conservancy fund in China, and a $0.9 million gain on liquidation of subsidiary.

Investment impairment was nil and $0.4 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Please see Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part III, Item 18 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

FASB ASC 740-10 establishes criteria for recognizing or continuing to recognize only more-likely-than-not tax positions, which may result in income tax expense volatility in future periods. While we believe that we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on income tax related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.

For a full reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% and further explanation of our provision for taxes, see Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part III, Item 18, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Income tax benefit was $0.03 million in 2019, decreasing $0.3 million, from $0.4 million of income tax expense in 2018. The decrease in income tax benefit in 2019 as compared with 2018 was primarily due to the income tax benefit of FIN48 reverse release decreased significantly and the income tax expenses of Taiwan increased due to the valuation allowance applied on deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate was 0.8% in 2019, compared to 7.1% in 2018, primarily due to the fluctuations of income before income taxes between the years.

As a result of the foregoing, net loss was $3.9 million, and net income was $4.8 million and $7.0 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk-Foreign Exchange Rate Risk” for information regarding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on us.

For information regarding governmental economic, fiscal, monetary or political policies or factors that have materially affected, or could materially affect, our operations or our shareholders’ investments, see “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Conducting Business in China” and “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation.”

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as of the dates indicated.

		December 31,		December 31,
		2019		2018		Change
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents		$	34,966	$	57,049	$	(22,083	)
Restricted cash			13,641		16,651		(3,010	)
Total		$	48,607	$	73,700	$	(25,093	)

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018
	(in thousands)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(24,147	)	$	(26,106	)
Cash provided by(used in) investing activities⁽¹⁾		(507	)		2,245
Cash used in financing activities		(993	)		(2,424	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		554			(701	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash ⁽¹⁾	$	(25,093	)	$	(26,986	)

⁽¹⁾ We adopted ASU2016-18 in 2018, and retrospectively adjusted 2017 balances.

Cash and cash equivalents, consisting primarily of bank deposits and money market funds, are recorded at cost which approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. As of December 31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.1 million, $19.3 million and $1.7 million were held by our subsidiaries in China, Japan and the U.S., respectively.

The PRC government imposes currency exchange controls on “non-current accounts” in China. Regulations in China permit foreign owned entities to freely convert the RMB into foreign currency for transactions that fall under the “current account,” which includes trade related receipts and payments. Accordingly, our PRC subsidiaries may use RMB to purchase foreign exchange for settlement of such “current account” transactions without pre- approval. However, pursuant to applicable regulations, foreign-invested enterprises in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In calculating accumulated profits, foreign investment enterprises in China are required to allocate at least 10% of their accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds unless these reserves have reached 50% of the registered capital of the enterprises.

Other transactions that involve conversion of RMB into foreign currency are classified as “capital account” transactions; examples of “capital account” transactions include repatriations of investments by or loans to foreign owners, or direct equity investments in a foreign entity by a China domiciled entity. “Capital account” transactions will be examined and registered by banks in China to convert a remittance into a foreign currency, such as U.S. dollars, and transmit the foreign currency outside of China. As a result of these and other restrictions under PRC laws and regulations, our China subsidiaries are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to the parent.

Net cash used in operating activities during 2019 was $24.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2019, our operating activities were significantly affected by the following:

Net cash used in investing activities during 2019 was $0.5 million, including cash inflows of $0.04 million of proceeds from sale of a short-term investment, partially offset by the cash outflow of $0.5 million for purchase of property, plant and equipment and $0.04 million for purchase of short-term investment.

Net cash used in financing activities during 2019 was $1.0 million, consisted of $1.0 million for repurchases of ordinary shares, $4.6 million for borrowing and repayments of loans and $0.06 million of proceeds from exercise of stock options. See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part III, Item 18 of this Annual on Form 20-F for additional discussion.

Net cash used in operating activities during 2018 was $26.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018, our operating activities were significantly affected by the following:

Net cash provided by investing activities during 2018 was $2.2 million, including cash inflows of $3.1 million from proceeds of the short-term investment, partially offset by the cash outflow of $0.2 million purchasing of property, plant and equipment and $0.7 million of acquisition uSTAR (net of cash acquired).

Net cash used in financing activities during 2018 was $2.4 million, consisted of $2.5 million for repurchases of ordinary shares and $0.1 million from proceeds from exercise of stock options. See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part III, Item 18 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F for additional discussion.

Accounts Receivable increased by $17.1 million to $77.8 million as of December 31, 2019 from $60.7 million as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, our allowance for doubtful accounts was $6.5 million on gross receivable of $84.3 million. The significant increase in Accounts Receivable was from India in 2019. We provided a $6.1 million allowance for doubtful accounts for our main customer in India. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business.”

☐	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

OR

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from to

OR

☐	SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


	Page
INTRODUCTION	1
PART I	3
ITEM 1-Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers	3
ITEM 2-Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable	3
ITEM 3-Key Information	3
ITEM 4-Information on the Company	25
ITEM 4A-Unresolved Staff Comments	32
ITEM 5-Operating and Financial Review and Prospects	32
ITEM 6-Directors, Senior Management and Employees	46
ITEM 7-Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions	52
ITEM 8-Financial Information	52
ITEM 9-The Offer and Listing	53
ITEM 10-Additional Information	54
ITEM 11-Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	59
ITEM 12-Description of Securities other than Equity Securities	60
PART II	62
ITEM 13-Defaults, Dividend Arrearages And Delinquencies	62
ITEM 14-Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use Of Proceeds	62
ITEM 15-Controls and Procedures	62
ITEM 16A-Audit Committee Financial Expert	63
ITEM 16B-Code of Ethics	63
ITEM 16C-Principal Accountant Fees and Services	64
ITEM 16D-Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees	64
ITEM 16E-Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	65
ITEM 16F-Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant	66
ITEM 16G-Corporate Governance	66
ITEM 16H-Mine Safety Disclosure	66
PART III	66
ITEM 17-Financial Statements	66
ITEM 18-Financial Statements	66
ITEM 19-Exhibits	67
SIGNATURES	68