form10q.htm

Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008	F-1
Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended March 31, 2009 And 2008 (Unaudited)	F-2
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	F-3
Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)	F-4

	March 31, 2008 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	-		$	-

Total current assets		-			-
TOTAL ASSETS	$	-		$	-

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accrued expenses	$	14,000		$	13,500
Total current liabilities		14,000			13,500

Stockholders' deficit
Common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 19,307 shares issued and outstanding		7,178,980			7,178,980
Accumulated deficit		(7,192,980	)		(7,192,480	)
Total stockholder’s deficit		(14,000	)		(13,500	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	-		$	-

	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Revenue, net	$	-		$	-

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		500			500
Total operating expenses		500			500

Loss from operations		(500	)		(500	)


Net loss	$	(500	)	$	(500	)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted		193,072,600			193,072,600

	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(500	)	$	(500	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued expenses		500			500
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		-			-


NET CHANGE IN CASH		-			-

CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		-			-
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	-		$	-

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-

Inter-Con/PC, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Minnesota as Infopac Systems, Inc. in 1983. On June 8, 1999, Infopac Systems, Inc. acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of Inter-Con/PC, Inc. through a statutory merger of Inter-Con/PC, Inc. into Infopac Systems, Inc. Immediately after the merger, Infopac Systems, Inc., changed its name to Inter-Con/PC, Inc. (the “Company”). For financial statement reporting purposes, the acquisition has been treated as a reverse acquisition of Infopac Systems, Inc. by Inter-Con/PC, Inc. and as a recapitalization of Inter-Con/PC, Inc.

The Company was formed as a technology-development corporation to develop, manufacture, and market a set-top-box computer that would facilitate the convergence of voice, video, data and other technologies all through the TV screen. The Company is currently inactive seeking merger and business opportunities.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the information filed as part of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Significant estimates include the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment, land use right, patents and purchased formulae and the normal capacity of the production facilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 “Disclosures about fair value of Financial Instruments” (“SFAS No. 107”) for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS No. 157 are described below:

Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

As defined by SFAS No. 107, the fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale, which was further clarified as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (“an exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2009 or 2008, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the period ended March 31, 2009 or 2008.

The Company follows the guidance of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101 “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB No. 101”), as amended by SAB No. 104 (“SAB No. 104”) for revenue recognition. The Company records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred and the title and risk of loss transfer to the buyer, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company is currently inactive.

The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of FIN 48.

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS No. 128”). Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of March 31, 2009 or 2008.

In June 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-8934 on June 26, 2008. Commencing with the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company is required to include a report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company; of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of year end; of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and that the Company’s independent accounting firm has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which report is also required to be filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) 157-4 “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”. Based on the guidance, if an entity determines that the level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased and that a transaction is not orderly, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a significant adjustment to the transaction or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. This FSP is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The company will adopt this FSP for its quarter ending June 30, 2009. There is no expected impact on the financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) 28-1 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”. The FSP amends SFAS No. 107 “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information. This FSP is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The company will include the required disclosures in its quarter ending June 30, 2009.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. The FSP states that in developing assumptions about renewal or extension options used to determine the useful life of an intangible asset, an entity needs to consider its own historical experience adjusted for entity-specific factors. In the absence of that experience, an entity shall consider the assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension options. This FSP is to be applied to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did not have an impact on the financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), which provides guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated as well as the rationale for why that date was selected. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Since FAS 165 at most requires additional disclosures, the Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification is effective for the Company in the interim period ending September 30, 2009 and the Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2009, the Company is currently inactive and is now seeking merger opportunities. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to find a merger candidate. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

NOTE 4 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management performed an evaluation of the Company’s activity through March 31, 2009, the date these financials were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there are no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

Information set forth herein contains "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may,” “should" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. No assurance can be given that the future results covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. The Company cautions readers that important factors may affect the Company’s actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These factors include the Company’s lack of historically profitable operations, dependence on key personnel, the success of the Company’s business, ability to manage anticipated growth and other factors identified in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases and/or other public communications.

We have not realized any revenues from operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 and we are inactive. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition, or merger with an operating company. As of March 31, 2009, we had no cash and through March 31, 2009, all our operating expenses have been paid by our majority stockholder.

Our plan for the next twelve months shall be to continue efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates. The Company can provide no assurance that a suitable candidate may be located or that a transaction may be consummated on terms that are favorable to the Company or that it can continue to satisfy its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The Company has incurred operating losses and negative operating cash flow since inception and future losses are anticipated. The Company’s plan of operations, even if successful, may not result in cash flow sufficient to finance and expand its business. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Realization of assets is dependent upon management’s plans to meet its financing requirements and the success of its future operations. These financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

As of April 1, 2001, the Company has ceased operations and currently has no assets. The Company does not have any credit facilities or other commitments for debt or equity financing. No assurances can be given that advances when needed will be available.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”), which changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Pursuant to SFAS No. 161, Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161 encourages but does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In years after initial adoption, this Statement requires comparative disclosures only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on the financial results of the Company.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 amends the factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and adds certain disclosures for an entity’s accounting policy of the treatment of the costs, period of extension, and total costs incurred. FSP 143-3 must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP 142-3 to have a material impact on the financial results of the Company.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). SFAS 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board auditing amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The Company does not expect SFAS 162 to have a material effect on its financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements and related notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to restructuring and impairments and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management and our board of directors, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 2009. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were of limited effectiveness at the reasonable assurance level at such date.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There was no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Section 302 of the Sarblanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York, State of New York on November 17, 2009.

	Minnesota		41-1853972
	(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x

Item 1.	Financial Statements
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition	1
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3
Item 4.	Control and Procedures	3

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	4
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	4
Item 5.	Other Information	4
Item 6.	Exhibits	4

	INTER-CON/PC, INC.
	(Registrant)


	/s/ Ronald S. McIntyre
	Name: Ronald S. McIntyre
	Title: Chairman, President,
	Chief Executive and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

	1350 Broadway, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018
	(Address of principal executive offices)

	1848 Harris Bridge Road, Anderson, South Carolina 29621
	(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

	(212) 216-8000
	(Issuer's telephone number)