XML 108 R486.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
Total
Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio
Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio1 – Class IA, IB and K Shares 1 Shareholders of the Portfolio have been asked to approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Termination, whereby, effective early to mid-June 2020, the Portfolio would be merged into the EQ/Janus Enterprise Portfolio, a series of EQ Advisors Trust, also managed by FMG LLC.
Investment Objective:
Seeks to achieve long-term growth of capital.
FEES AND EXPENSES OF THE PORTFOLIO
The following table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the Portfolio. The table below does not reflect any fees and expenses associated with variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity certificates and contracts (“Contracts”), which would increase overall fees and expenses. See the Contract prospectus for a description of those fees and expenses.
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)
Shareholder Fees - Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio - USD ($)
Class IA Shares
Class IB Shares
Class K Shares
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)
Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses - Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio
Class IA Shares
Class IB Shares
Class K Shares
Management Fee 0.80% 0.80% 0.80%
Distribution and/or Service Fees (12b-1 fees) 0.25% 0.25% none
Other Expenses 0.26% 0.26% 0.26%
Total Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses 1.31% 1.31% 1.06%
Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement [1] (0.21%) (0.21%) (0.21%)
Total Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement 1.10% 1.10% 0.85%
[1] Pursuant to a contract, AXA Equitable Funds Management Group, LLC (the “Adviser”) has agreed to make payments or waive its management, administrative and other fees to limit the expenses of the Portfolio through April 30, 2021 (unless the Board of Trustees consents to an earlier revision or termination of this arrangement) (“Expense Limitation Arrangement”) so that the annual operating expenses of the Portfolio (exclusive of taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, dividend and interest expenses on securities sold short, capitalized expenses, acquired fund fees and expenses and extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Portfolio’s business) do not exceed an annual rate of average daily net assets of 1.10% for Class IA and IB shares and 0.85% for Class K shares of the Portfolio. The Expense Limitation Arrangement may be terminated by the Adviser at any time after April 30, 2021. The Adviser may be reimbursed the amount of any such payments or waivers in the future provided that the payments or waivers are reimbursed within three years of the payments or waivers being recorded and the Portfolio’s expense ratio, after the reimbursement is taken into account, does not exceed the Portfolio’s expense cap at the time of the waiver or the Portfolio’s expense cap at the time of the reimbursement, whichever is lower.
Example
This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Portfolio with the cost of investing in other portfolios. The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Portfolio for the periods indicated, that your investment has a 5% return each year, that the Portfolio’s operating expenses remain the same, and that the Expense Limitation Arrangement is not renewed. This Example does not reflect any Contract-related fees and expenses including redemption fees (if any) at the Contract level. If such fees and expenses were reflected, the total expenses would be higher. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions, whether you redeem or hold your shares, your costs would be:
Expense Example - Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio - USD ($)
1 Year
3 Years
5 Years
10 Years
Class IA Shares 112 395 698 1,561
Class IB Shares 112 395 698 1,561
Class K Shares 87 316 564 1,275
Expense Example, No Redemption - Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio - USD ($)
1 Year
3 Years
5 Years
10 Years
Class IA Shares 112 395 698 1,561
Class IB Shares 112 395 698 1,561
Class K Shares 87 316 564 1,275
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER
The Portfolio pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over” its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs. These costs, which are not reflected in annual fund operating expenses or in the Example, affect the Portfolio’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate was 47% of the average value of the Portfolio.
INVESTMENTS, RISKS, AND PERFORMANCE Principal Investment Strategy:
Under normal circumstances, the Portfolio intends to invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in equity securities of U.S. mid-capitalization companies. For purposes of this Portfolio, mid-capitalization companies generally are companies with market capitalization within the range of companies in the Russell 2500TM Index (“Russell 2500”) or the Russell Midcap® Index (“Russell Midcap”) at the time of investment (as of December 31, 2019, the market capitalization of the companies in the Russell 2500 was between $12.7 million and $20.0 billion and the market capitalization of the companies in the Russell Midcap was between $788.1 million and $78.6 billion). In addition, securities of mid-capitalization companies may include financial instruments that derive their value from the securities of such companies. The sizes of the companies in these indexes change with market conditions, which can result in changes to the market capitalization ranges of companies in the indexes. The Portfolio intends to invest primarily in common stocks, but it may also invest in other securities that a Sub-Adviser believes provide opportunities for capital growth.

AXA Equitable Funds Management Group, LLC (“FMG LLC” or “Adviser”) will generally allocate the Portfolio’s assets among three or more Sub-Advisers, each of which will manage its portion of the Portfolio using different yet complementary investment strategies. Under normal circumstances, one portion of the portfolio will track the performance of a particular index (“Index Allocated Portion”) and the other portions of the Portfolio will be actively managed (“Active Allocated Portions”). Under normal circumstances, the Adviser anticipates allocating approximately 50% of the Portfolio’s net assets to the Index Allocated Portion and the remaining 50% of net assets among the Active Allocated Portions. These percentages are targets established by the Adviser and actual allocations between the portions may deviate from these targets by up to 20% of the Portfolio’s net assets.

The Index Allocated Portion of the Portfolio seeks to track the performance (before fees and expenses) of the Russell 2500TM Growth Index with minimal tracking error. This strategy is commonly referred to as an indexing strategy. Generally, the Index Allocated Portion uses a full replication technique, although in certain instances a sampling approach may be utilized for a portion of the Index Allocated Portion.

Each Active Allocated Portion utilizes an aggressive, growth-oriented investment style and invests primarily in equity securities of companies that, in the view of the Sub-Adviser, are either in or entering into the growth phase of their business cycle. A Sub-Adviser may sell a security for a variety of reasons, such as to make other investments believed by the Sub-Adviser to offer superior investment opportunities.

The Portfolio also may lend its portfolio securities to earn additional income.
Principal Risks:
An investment in the Portfolio is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. The value of your investment may fall, sometimes sharply, and you could lose money by investing in the Portfolio. There can be no assurance that the Portfolio will achieve its investment objective.

The following risks can negatively affect the Portfolio’s performance. The most significant risks are listed first, followed by additional risks in alphabetical order.

Index Strategy Risk: The Portfolio (or a portion thereof) employs an index strategy and generally will not modify its index strategy to respond to changes in market trends or the economy, which means that the Portfolio may be particularly susceptible to a general decline in the market segment relating to the relevant index. In addition, although the index strategy attempts to closely track the relevant index, the Portfolio may not invest in all of the securities in the index. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the performance of the index strategy will match that of the relevant index. To the extent the Portfolio utilizes a representative sampling approach, it may experience tracking error to a greater extent than if the Portfolio sought to replicate the index.

Mid-Cap and Small-Cap Company Risk: Mid-cap and small-cap companies carry additional risks because the operating histories of these companies tend to be more limited, their earnings and revenues less predictable (and some companies may be experiencing significant losses), and their share prices more volatile than those of larger, more established companies, all of which can negatively affect their value. In general, these risks are greater for small-cap companies than for mid-cap companies.

Investment Style Risk: The Portfolio may use a particular style or set of styles — in this case a “growth” style — to select investments. A particular style may be out of favor or may not produce the best results over short or longer time periods. Growth stocks may be more sensitive to changes in current or expected earnings than the prices of other stocks. Growth investing also is subject to the risk that the stock price of one or more companies will fall or will fail to appreciate as anticipated by the Portfolio, regardless of movements in the securities market. Growth stocks also tend to be more volatile than value stocks, so in a declining market their prices may decrease more than value stocks in general. Growth stocks also may increase the volatility of the Portfolio’s share price.

Sector Risk: From time to time, based on market or economic conditions, the Portfolio may have significant positions in one or more sectors of the market. To the extent the Portfolio invests more heavily in particular sectors, its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors. Individual sectors may be more volatile, and may perform differently, than the broader market. The industries that constitute a sector may all react in the same way to economic, political or regulatory events.

Equity Risk: In general, the values of stocks and other equity securities fluctuate, and sometimes widely fluctuate, in response to changes in a company’s financial condition as well as general market, economic and political conditions and other factors.

Market Risk: The Portfolio is subject to the risk that the securities markets will move down, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably, based on overall economic conditions and other factors, which may negatively affect Portfolio performance. Securities markets also may experience long periods of decline in value. Changes in the financial condition of a single issuer can impact a market as a whole. Geo-political risks, including terrorism, tensions or open conflict between nations, or political or economic dysfunction within some nations that are major players on the world stage, may lead to instability in world economies and markets, may lead to increased market volatility, and may have adverse long-term effects. Events such as natural disasters or pandemics, and governments’ reactions to such events, could cause uncertainty in the markets and may adversely affect the performance of the global economy. In addition, markets and market participants are increasingly reliant on information data systems. Inaccurate data, software or other technology malfunctions, programming inaccuracies, unauthorized use or access, and similar circumstances may impair the performance of these systems and may have an adverse impact upon a single issuer, a group of issuers, or the market at-large.

Multiple Sub-Adviser Risk: To a significant extent, the Portfolio’s performance will depend on the success of the Adviser in allocating the Portfolio’s assets to Sub-Advisers and its selection and oversight of the Sub-Advisers. The Sub-Advisers’ investment strategies may not work together as planned, which could adversely affect the Portfolio’s performance. Because each Sub-Adviser directs the trading for its own portion of the Portfolio, and does not aggregate its transactions with those of the other Sub-Adviser, the Portfolio may incur higher brokerage costs than would be the case if a single Sub-Adviser were managing the entire Portfolio. In addition, while the Adviser seeks to allocate the Portfolio’s assets among the Portfolio’s Sub-Advisers in a manner that it believes is consistent with achieving the Portfolio’s investment objective(s), the Adviser is subject to conflicts of interest in allocating the Portfolio’s assets among Sub-Advisers, including affiliated Sub-Advisers, because the Adviser pays different fees to the Sub-Advisers and due to other factors that could impact the Adviser’s revenues and profits.

Portfolio Management Risk: The Portfolio is subject to the risk that strategies used by an investment manager and its securities selections fail to produce the intended results. An investment manager’s judgments or decisions about the quality, relative yield or value of, or market trends affecting, a particular security or issuer, industry, sector, region or market segment, or about the economy or interest rates, may be incorrect or otherwise may not produce the intended results, which may result in losses to the Portfolio. In addition, many processes used in Portfolio management, including security selection, rely, in whole or in part, on the use of various technologies. The Portfolio may suffer losses if there are imperfections, errors or limitations in the quantitative, analytic or other tools, resources, information and data used, or the analyses employed or relied on, by an investment manager, or if such tools, resources, information or data are used incorrectly, fail to produce the desired results, or otherwise do not work as intended. There can be no assurance that the use of these technologies will result in effective investment decisions for the Portfolio.

Securities Lending Risk: The Portfolio may lend its portfolio securities to seek income. There is a risk that a borrower may default on its obligations to return loaned securities. The Portfolio will be responsible for the risks associated with the investment of cash collateral and may lose money on its investment of cash collateral or may fail to earn sufficient income on its investment to meet obligations to the borrower. Securities lending may introduce leverage into the Portfolio. In addition, delays may occur in the recovery of loaned securities from borrowers, which could interfere with the Portfolio’s ability to vote proxies or to settle transactions.
Risk/Return Bar Chart and Table
The bar chart and table below provide some indication of the risks of investing in the Portfolio by showing changes in the Portfolio’s performance from year to year and by showing how the Portfolio’s average annual total returns for the past one, five and ten years (or since inception) through December 31, 2019 compared to the returns of a broad-based securities market index. The return of the broad-based securities market index (and any additional comparative index) shown in the right hand column below is the return of the index for the last 10 years or, if shorter, since the inception of the share class with the longest history. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

The performance results do not reflect any Contract-related fees and expenses, which would reduce the performance results.

Prior to April 2014, the Portfolio employed a volatility management strategy; returns prior to that date may have been different if the Portfolio had followed its current policies. For periods prior to June 2014, the performance shown below is that of the Portfolio’s predecessor, a series of EQ Premier VIP Trust that had a substantially identical investment objective, policies and strategies.
Calendar Year Annual Total Returns — Class IB
Bar Chart
Best Quarter (% and time period)      Worst Quarter (% and time period)
20.35% (2019 1st Quarter)      –22.31% (2011 3rd Quarter)
Average Annual Total Returns
Average Annual Total Returns - Multimanager Mid Cap Growth Portfolio
One Year
Five Years
Ten Years
Since Inception
Inception Date
Class IA 33.06% 10.79% 12.77%    
Class IB 32.91% 10.77% 12.72%    
Class K 33.29% 11.06%   14.06% Aug. 26, 2011
Russell 2500™ Growth Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes) 32.65% 10.84% 14.01%