XML 73 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Note 4 - Investment Securities
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]  
Investments in Debt and Marketable Equity Securities (and Certain Trading Assets) Disclosure [Text Block]

4. Investment Securities. The following is a summary of the securities portfolio by major category. The amortized cost and fair value of each category, with gross unrealized gains and losses at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:


   

March 31, 2015

 
           

Gross

   

Gross

         
   

Amortized

   

Unrealized

   

Unrealized

   

Fair

 

Securities available for sale:

 

Cost

   

Gains

   

Losses

   

Value

 
   

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

  $ 30,896     $ 763     $ -     $ 31,659  

Mortgage-backed securities

    151,504       4,626       41       156,089  

Municipal securities

    53,879       2,063       21       55,921  

Corporate bonds

    28,881       54       121       28,814  

Total

  $ 265,160     $ 7,506     $ 183     $ 272,483  

   

December 31, 2014

 
           

Gross

   

Gross

         
   

Amortized

   

Unrealized

   

Unrealized

   

Fair

 

Securities available for sale:

 

Cost

   

Gains

   

Losses

   

Value

 
   

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

  $ 30,911     $ 397     $ 76     $ 31,232  

Mortgage-backed securities

    170,443       4,384       547       174,280  

Municipal securities

    54,014       1,797       109       55,702  

Corporate bonds

    31,411       36       362       31,085  

Total

  $ 286,779     $ 6,614     $ 1,094     $ 292,299  

   

March 31, 2015

 
           

Gross

   

Gross

         
   

Amortized

   

Unrealized

   

Unrealized

   

Fair

 

Securities held to maturity:

 

Cost

   

Gains

   

Losses

   

Value

 
   

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

  $ 508     $ 6     $ -     $ 514  

   

December 31, 2014

 
           

Gross

   

Gross

         
   

Amortized

   

Unrealized

   

Unrealized

   

Fair

 

Securities held to maturity:

 

Cost

   

Gains

   

Losses

   

Value

 
   

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

  $ 507     $ 5     $ -     $ 512  

The following table summarizes investment securities gross unrealized losses, fair value and length of time the securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The Company deems these unrealized losses to be temporary and recoverable prior to or at maturity. The Company has the ability and intent to hold the investment securities for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a market price recovery or until maturity.


   

March 31, 2015

 
   

Less Than 12 Months

   

12 Months or More

   

Total

 
   

Fair

Value

   

Unrealized

Losses

   

Fair

Value

   

Unrealized

Losses

   

Fair

Value

   

Unrealized

Losses

 
   

(In thousands)

 

Mortgage-backed securities

  $ 17,427     $ 20     $ 2,975     $ 21     $ 20,402     $ 41  

Municipal securities

    4,253       21       -       -       4,253       21  

Corporate bonds

    11,307       29       5,908       92       17,215       121  

Total

  $ 32,987     $ 70     $ 8,883     $ 113     $ 41,870     $ 183  

   

December 31, 2014

 
   

Less Than 12 Months

   

12 Months or More

   

Total

 
   

Fair

Value

   

Unrealized

Losses

   

Fair

Value

   

Unrealized

Losses

   

Fair

Value

   

Unrealized

Losses

 
   

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

  $ 11,790     $ 76     $ -     $ -     $ 11,790     $ 76  

Mortgage-backed securities

    61,106       527       3,093       20       64,109       547  

Municipal securities

    5,469       99       904       10       6,373       109  

Corporate bonds

    21,670       256       3,894       106       25,564       362  

Total

  $ 100,035     $ 958     $ 7,891     $ 136     $ 107,926     $ 1,094  

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair values of the investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2015, by contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


   

Less Than

One Year

   

One to

Five Years

   

Five to

Ten Years

   

Over

Ten Years

 

Securities available for sale:

 

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

                               

Amortized cost

  $ -     $ 7,614     $ 23,282     $ -  

Fair value

    -       7,710       23,949       -  

Mortgage-backed securities

                               

Amortized cost

    -       75,592       53,959       21,953  

Fair value

    -       77,428       55,009       23,652  

Municipal securities

                               

Amortized cost

    1,945       24,240       23,969       3,725  

Fair value

    1,965       24,947       25,142       3,867  

Corporate bonds

                               

Amortized cost

    -       15,383       13,498       -  

Fair value

    -       15,385       13,429       -  

Total Amortized cost

  $ 1,945     $ 122,829     $ 114,708     $ 25,678  

Total Fair value

  $ 1,965     $ 125,470     $ 117,529     $ 27,519  

   

Less Than

One Year

   

One to

Five Years

   

Five to

Ten Years

   

Over

Ten Years

 

Securities held to maturity:

 

(In thousands)

 

Government agencies

                               

Amortized cost

  $ -     $ 508     $ -     $ -  

Fair value

    -       514       -       -  

Total Amortized cost

  $ -     $ 508     $ -     $ -  

Total Fair value

  $ -     $ 514     $ -     $ -  

FHLB agency bonds with an amortized cost of $9.4 million and $9.7 million were pledged as collateral for public deposits at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. In addition, a government agency bond with an amortized cost of $508,000 and $507,000 was pledged as collateral on a forward starting interest rate swap transaction at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.


At March 31, 2015, the investment securities portfolio included 58 taxable and tax-exempt debt instruments issued by various U.S. states, counties, cities, municipalities and school districts. The following table is a summary, by U.S. state, of the Company’s investment in the obligations of state and political subdivisions:


   

Amortized Cost

     

Fair Value

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions:

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

General obligation bonds:

                 

Texas

  $ 11,252       $ 11,880  

Pennsylvania

    6,492         6,597  

California

    3,563         3,640  

North Carolina

    2,993         3,061  

New York

    2,579         2,669  

South Carolina

    2,295         2,371  

Other (9 states)

    10,742         11,124  

Total general obligation bonds

    39,916         41,342  

Revenue bonds:

                 

North Carolina

    4,964         5,220  

New York

    2,796         2,865  

Texas

    2,766         2,854  

Pennsylvania

    1,774         1,871  

Florida

    1,663         1,768  

Total revenue bonds

    13,963         14,578  

Total obligations of state and political subdivisions

  $ 53,879       $ 55,920  

The largest exposure in general obligation bonds was one bond issued by Ambridge Area School District, Pennsylvania, with a total amortized cost basis of $2.4 million and total fair value of $2.4 million at March 31, 2015. Of this total, $2.4 million in amortized cost and $2.4 million in fair value are guaranteed by an insurance policy issued by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.


The following table is a summary of the revenue sources related to the Company’s investment in revenue bonds:


   

March 31, 2015

 
   

Amortized Cost

     

Fair Value

 

Revenue bonds by revenue source:

   

(dollars in thousands)

 

Refunding bonds

  $ 4,483       $ 4,738  

University and college

    2,766         2,854  

Public improvements

    2,177         2,266  

Pension funding

    1,774         1,871  

Other

    2,763         2,849  

Total revenue bonds

  $ 13,963       $ 14,578  

The largest single exposure in revenue bonds is an issue from the Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development in Pennsylvania. The debt is to be repaid by the City of Philadelphia from revenues of pledged assets held and their taxes received. As of March 31, 2015, this issue had an amortized cost of $1.8 million and fair value of $1.9 million.


Prior to purchasing any security, the Bank ensures that the security is “investment grade”. For a security to be investment grade it must: (1) have a low risk of default by the obligor, and (2) expect the full and timely repayment of principal and interest over the expected life. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), certain investments are deemed investment grade. These include: U.S. Treasury securities, Federal Agency securities, Revenue Bonds, and Unlimited-Tax General Obligation Municipals. Other securities undergo a pre-purchase analysis to ensure they are investment grade. To determine if a security is investment grade, if available, management utilizes the ratings of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSRO). However, they are not the sole basis of determining if a security is investment grade. In addition, on a pre-purchase basis, at least one of the following items pertaining to the obligor is acquired and reviewed as part of the Bank’s internal credit analysis: data from debt offerings (prospectus/offering circular); data from regulatory filings (10-Q, 10-K, 8-K); data available from the obligor’s website (annual reports, press releases); data obtained from a third party (i.e. bond broker, analyst); NRSRO report on the initial offering and/or subsequent reviews of the issuer; or other pertinent available financial information. There have been no instances where the NRSRO’s credit rating has significantly differed from that of the Bank’s credit analysis.


In addition to the pre-purchase analysis preformed on securities acquired, we preform going monitoring of our corporate and municipal bond holdings. This monitoring includes staying abreast of material events that may impact the Bank’s ability to be repaid all principal and interest from an issuer in a timely manner. Given the recent disruptions to the oil and gas industry and our municipal holdings in Texas, we have expanded the scope of our surveillance to municipalities in Texas. In addition to monitoring for material events, such as changes in NRSRO grades, we track the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) Crude Oil prices, both current and futures. While we will continue to monitor our positions, given the diversified economic landscape of Texas, the current and future pricing of WTI, the strong credit ratings of our holdings, our limited exposure to the more oil sensitive areas of the state (Houston and Harris County, Midland, Odessa) coupled with the insurance backing of our investments in the oil sensitive areas of Texas, we are comfortable holding our positions at the present time.