XML 33 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] 
Commitments and Contingencies
Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies
We have a long-term strategic relationship with Healthcare Technology Systems, Inc. (HTS), a leading authority in the research, development and validation of computer administered clinical rating instruments. The strategic relationship includes the exclusive licensing (subject to one pre-existing license agreement) of 57 Interactive Voice Response (IVR) clinical assessments offered by HTS along with HTS’s IVR system. As of September 30, 2011, we had paid HTS $1.5 million for the license and $1.0 million in advance payments against future royalties. As of September 30, 2011, HTS had earned royalties of $0.3 million, which were offset against the advance royalty payments. Future royalty payments will be made to HTS based on the level of ePRO revenues received from the assessments and the IVR system, and such royalties will be applied against the advance royalty payments.
On November 28, 2007, we completed the acquisition of CCSS. The acquisition included a marketing agreement under which Covance is obligated to use us as its provider of centralized cardiac safety solutions, and to offer these solutions to Covance’s customers, on an exclusive basis, for a 10-year period, subject to certain exceptions. We expense payments to Covance based upon a portion of the revenues we receive during each calendar year of the 10-year term that are based primarily on referrals made by Covance under the agreement. The agreement does not restrict our continuing collaboration with our other key CRO, Phase I units, Academic Research Centers and other strategic partners.
We offer warranties on certain products for various periods of time. We accrue for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Our product warranty liability reflects management’s best estimate of probable liability based on current and historical product sales data and warranty costs incurred.
Our costs in Germany are subject to foreign exchange fluctuations as the majority of these costs are paid in euros. We enter into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate such foreign exchange fluctuations. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and changes in fair value are immediately recognized into earnings in the line item foreign exchange (losses) gains. The activity for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 was as follows:
                 
    Amount     Avg Rate  
 
               
Forward Contracts entered in Q3 2011
  $5.9 million   $ 1.40  
 
               
Forward Contracts settled in Q3 2011
  $13.9 million   $ 1.42  
 
               
Forward Contracts open at September 30, 2011
  $0.0 million     N/A  
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we entered into $31.6 million of foreign exchange forward contracts; $31.6 million matured and none was outstanding at September 30, 2011. In October 2011, we entered into forward contracts to sell $4.1 million U.S. dollars and purchase euros at an average of $1.36 U.S. dollars to 1 euro. Such contracts have various maturities through December 31, 2011.
We are involved in legal proceedings from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. We accrue an estimated loss contingency in our consolidated financial statements if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable resolutions can occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. We regularly review contingencies to determine whether our accruals are adequate. The amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates.
We recognize estimated loss contingencies for litigation in general and administrative operating expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In December 2010, we terminated the employment relationship with one of our employees. The employee filed a lawsuit in December 2010 against such termination, applying for a ruling that the termination was not legally effective and that the employment relationship is not terminated. In the second quarter of 2011, we agreed to a settlement with the former employee which did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.