XML 109 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.4
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and include our accounts as well as the accounts of other entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
We have reclassified certain amounts reported in our prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.
We are operating under the basis that we will realize assets and satisfy liabilities in the normal course of business as a going concern and in accordance with the authority provided by FHFA to our Board of Directors to oversee management's conduct of our business operations.
Use of Estimates
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management has made significant estimates to report the allowance for credit losses on single-family mortgage loans. Actual results could be different from these estimates.
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash collateral accepted from counterparties that we do not have the right to use for general corporate purposes is classified as restricted cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash and cash equivalents includes cash remittances received from servicers of the underlying assets of our consolidated trusts which are deposited into a separate custodial account. We invest the cash held in the custodial account in short-term investments; and we are entitled to the interest income earned on these short-term investments, which is recorded as interest income on our consolidated statements of income.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to, stockholders. Comprehensive income consists of net income plus other comprehensive income, including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
Recently Adopted or Issued Accounting Guidance

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Consolidated Financial Statements
ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
The amendments in this Update require annual disclosure of more detailed tax rate reconciliation categories and income taxes paid by geography and jurisdiction.December 31, 2025The adoption of these amendments did not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements. We adopted the guidance in this Update on a retrospective basis.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance, Not Yet Adopted Within Our Consolidated Financial Statements
StandardDescriptionDate of Planned AdoptionEffect on Consolidated Financial Statements
ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
The amendments in this Update require disaggregated disclosures for certain expense categories.December 31, 2027We do not expect the adoption of these amendments to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans
The amendments in this Update expand the population of acquired financial assets subject to the gross-up approach in Topic 326.January 1, 2027We do not expect the adoption of these amendments to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements
The amendments in this Update clarify certain aspects of the guidance on hedge accounting and address several incremental hedging issues arising from the global reference rate reform initiative.January 1, 2026We do not expect the adoption of these amendments to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation, Variable Interest Entity, Policy
Securitization and Consolidation
For each entity with which we are involved, we determine whether the entity should be consolidated in our financial statements. We consolidate entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. The method for determining whether a controlling financial interest exists varies depending on whether the entity is a VIE. For entities that are not VIEs, we hold a controlling financial interest in entities where we hold a majority of the voting rights or a majority of a limited partnership's kick-out rights through voting interests. We do not currently consolidate any entities which are not VIEs. We use the equity method to account for our interests in entities in which we do not have a controlling financial interest, but over which we have significant influence.
Our primary business activities in the Single-Family and Multifamily segments involve the securitization of loans or other mortgage-related assets using trusts that are VIEs. These trusts issue beneficial interests in the loans or other mortgage-related assets that they own. We guarantee the principal and interest payments on some or all of the issued beneficial interests in substantially all of our securitization transactions. We also use trusts that are VIEs in certain CRT products.
Consolidated VIEs
We consolidate VIEs when we have a controlling financial interest in the VIE and are therefore considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE. We are the primary beneficiary of a VIE when we have both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and exposure to losses or benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary of VIEs in which we have interests at both inception and on an ongoing basis, and the primary beneficiary determination may change over time as our interest in the VIE changes. Generally, the assets of our consolidated VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIE, and the creditors of our consolidated VIEs have recourse to the general credit of Freddie Mac only to the extent that we have provided a guarantee to the VIE.
When we consolidate a VIE, we recognize the assets and liabilities of the VIE on our consolidated balance sheets and account for those assets and liabilities based on the applicable GAAP for each specific type of asset or liability. Assets and liabilities that we transfer to a VIE at, after, or shortly before the date we become the primary beneficiary of the VIE are initially measured at the same amounts that they would have been measured if they had not been transferred, and no gain or loss is recognized on these transfers. For all other VIEs that we consolidate, we recognize the assets and liabilities of the VIE at fair value, and we recognize a gain or loss for the difference between:
n    The sum of the fair value of the consideration paid, the fair value of any noncontrolling interests, and the reported amount of any previously held interests and
n    The fair value of the net identifiable assets recognized.
Single-Family
Securitization Products
Level 1 Securitization Products
Level 1 Securitization Products consist of UMBS, 55-day MBS, ARM PCs and Gold PCs, which are all pass-through debt securities that represent undivided beneficial interests in a pool of loans held by a securitization trust. All Level 1 Securitization Products are backed only by mortgage loans we have acquired. We serve as both administrator and guarantor for these trusts. As administrator, we have the right to establish servicing terms and direct loss mitigation activities for the loans held by these trusts. As guarantor, we guarantee the payment of principal and interest on these securities in exchange for a guarantee fee, and we have the right to purchase delinquent loans from the trust to help improve the economic performance of the trust. We absorb all credit losses of these trusts through our guarantee of the principal and interest payments.
The economic performance of these trusts is most significantly affected by the performance of the underlying loans. Our rights as administrator and guarantor provide us with the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performance of the underlying loans. We also have the obligation to absorb losses of these trusts that could potentially be significant through our guarantee of principal and interest payments. Accordingly, we concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of and, therefore, consolidate these trusts.
Other Securitization Products
We are the primary beneficiary of and, therefore, consolidate the trusts used to issue certain of our Single-Family other securitization products when we have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the trusts and we have the obligation to absorb credit losses through our guarantee of some or all of the issued securities.
Multifamily
Securitization Products
Multifamily PCs
Multifamily PCs are fully guaranteed pass-through securities with a 55-day payment delay that are collateralized by a single underlying mortgage loan held by a securitization trust. We serve as both administrator and guarantor for these trusts. As administrator, we have the right to establish servicing terms and direct loss mitigation activities for the loans held by these trusts. As guarantor, we guarantee the payment of principal and interest on these securities in exchange for a guarantee fee, and we have the right to purchase a delinquent loan from the trust. We absorb all credit losses of these trusts through our guarantee of the principal and interest payments.
The economic performance of these trusts is most significantly affected by the performance of the underlying loans. Our rights as administrator and guarantor provide us with the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performance of the underlying loans. We also have the obligation to absorb losses of these trusts that could potentially be significant through our guarantee of principal and interest payments. Accordingly, we concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of and, therefore, consolidate these trusts.
K Certificates and Other Securitization Products
We are the primary beneficiary of and, therefore, consolidate the trusts used to issue fully guaranteed K Certificates and certain of our Multifamily other securitization products when we have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIEs and we have the obligation to absorb credit losses through our guarantee of the issued securities.
WI K-Deal Certificates
In a WI K-Deal Certificate transaction, we forward sell a K Certificate to be issued in the future to WI K Certificate investors thereby reducing our exposure to future changes in interest rates and K Certificate spreads. The WI K-Deal trust simultaneously issues guaranteed securities (WI Certificates).
The economic performance of our WI K-Deal trusts is most significantly affected by the performance of the underlying assets. We manage the underlying assets of the trust prior to the delivery of the K Certificate and determine which K Certificate will be delivered into the trust. Therefore, we have the power to direct the activities that are most significant to the WI K-Deal trust. We also initially have economic exposure to the variability of the trust through our guarantee of the issued WI Certificates. As a result, we are the primary beneficiary of and, therefore, initially consolidate the trusts used to issue WI Certificates. Upon delivering the K Certificate into the trust, we no longer have a variable interest and therefore deconsolidate the WI K-Deal trust.
Nonconsolidated VIEs
Single-Family
Securitization Products
We do not consolidate certain of our Single-Family other securitization products, including senior subordinate securitizations backed by seasoned loans, because we do not have the ability to direct the loss mitigation activities of the underlying loans,
which is the most significant activity affecting the economic performance of the VIE. When we sell loans in this type of transaction, we derecognize the transferred loans and account for our guarantee to the nonconsolidated VIE. We account for our investments in the beneficial interests issued by the nonconsolidated VIE, if any, as investments in debt securities. We also do not consolidate the trusts used to issue certain other types of our Single-Family other securitization products when we do not have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE.
Resecuritization Products
We create resecuritization products primarily by using Level 1 Securitization Products, our previously issued resecuritization products, or similar TBA-eligible products issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae as the underlying collateral. In a typical resecuritization transaction, previously issued Level 1 Securitization Products or resecuritization products are transferred to a resecuritization trust that issues beneficial interests in the underlying collateral. We establish parameters that define eligibility standards for assets that may be used as collateral for each of our resecuritization programs. Resecuritization products can then be created based on the parameters that we have established. Similar to our Level 1 Securitization Products, we guarantee the payment of principal and interest to the investors in our resecuritization products.
The main types of resecuritization products we create are single-class resecuritization products (Supers, Giant MBS, and Giant PCs) and multiclass resecuritization products (REMICs and Strips).
n    Single-class resecuritization products - These securities are direct pass-throughs of the cash flows of the underlying collateral, which may be previously issued Level 1 Securitization Products, single-class resecuritization products, or similar TBA-eligible products issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae. We do not consolidate the trusts used in these transactions unless we have the unilateral ability to liquidate the trust (for example if we own all of the trust's issued beneficial interests), as these transactions do not result in any new or incremental risk to the holders of the securities issued by the resecuritization trust and because we are not exposed to any incremental rights to receive benefits or obligations to absorb losses that could be significant to the resecuritization trust.
We account for purchases of single-class resecuritization products that we issue that are substantially the same as the underlying collateral as debt extinguishment of a pro-rata portion of the underlying Level 1 Securitization Product. We account for purchases of single-class resecuritization products that we issue that are not considered substantially the same as the underlying collateral as investments in debt securities. Single-class resecuritization products that we issue that are backed entirely by Freddie Mac collateral are considered substantially the same as the underlying collateral, while commingled single-class resecuritization products that we issue are not considered substantially the same as the underlying collateral.
n    Multiclass resecuritization products - These securities are multiclass resecuritizations of the cash flows of the underlying collateral, which may be previously issued Level 1 Securitization Products, single-class resecuritization products, multiclass resecuritization products, or similar TBA-eligible products issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae. The activity that most significantly impacts the economic performance of our multiclass resecuritization trusts is typically the initial design and structuring of the trust. Substantially all multiclass resecuritization trusts are created as part of transactions in which an investor or dealer participates in the decisions made during the design and establishment of the trust. As a result, we do not have the unilateral ability to direct the activities of our multiclass resecuritization trusts that most significantly impact the economic performance of those trusts. In addition, unless we retain a portion of the issued multiclass resecuritization products, we do not have the right to receive benefits or the obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the trusts because we have already provided a guarantee on the underlying assets. As a result, we have concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary of our multiclass resecuritization trusts and, therefore, do not consolidate those trusts unless we have the unilateral ability to liquidate the trust.     
When we purchase a multiclass resecuritization product as an investment in our mortgage-related investments portfolio, we record the security as an investment in debt securities rather than extinguishment of debt since we are investing in the debt securities of a nonconsolidated entity. Similarly, sales of multiclass resecuritization products previously held as investments in our mortgage-related investments portfolio are accounted for as sales of investments in debt securities. See Note 7 for additional information on accounting for investments in debt securities.
CRT Products
We transfer credit risk exposure on certain mortgage loans that we own or guarantee using CRT products, including STACR Trust notes. In these transactions, a trust issues STACR Trust notes whose repayments are based on the credit performance of a reference pool of mortgage loans. The trust uses the proceeds from the issuance of the notes to purchase short-term eligible investments and makes periodic payments of principal and interest on the notes to investors. We make payments to the trust to support payment of the interest due on the notes, and we receive payments from the trust that otherwise would have been made to the noteholders to the extent there are credit events on the mortgages in the reference pool. The note balances are reduced by the amount of the payments to us. The trust was designed to create and pass along to its interest holders the variability related to the credit risk of the mortgages in the reference pool. We do not have a variable interest in the risk that the trust was designed to create and pass along to its interest holders or the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE. As a result, we do not consolidate the trusts used in the STACR Trust note transactions.
We account for our obligations to make certain payments to the STACR Trust note VIEs to support payment of the interest due on the notes as derivative instruments. We account for our rights to receive payments from the STACR Trust note VIEs to the extent there are credit events on the mortgages in the reference pool as freestanding credit enhancement contracts. Freestanding contracts are entered into separately and apart from any other financial instrument or in conjunction with some other transaction and are legally detachable and separately exercisable. We recognize the payments we make to transfer credit risk under freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily consist of STACR Trust notes and ACIS transactions in Single-Family, in credit enhancement expense in our consolidated statements of income when they are incurred. We recognize expected recoveries from such transactions in other assets with an offsetting reduction to non-interest expense, at the same time that we recognize an allowance for credit losses on the covered loans, measured on the same basis as the allowance for credit losses on the covered loans. Credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts are considered when measuring our allowance for credit losses. See Note 6 for additional information on credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts.
Multifamily
Securitization Products
K Certificates
In a senior subordinate K Certificate transaction, we sell multifamily loans to a non-Freddie Mac trust that issues senior and subordinate securities, and simultaneously purchase and place the senior securities into a Freddie Mac trust that issues guaranteed K Certificates. In these transactions, we guarantee the senior securities issued by the non-Freddie Mac trust but do not issue or guarantee the subordinate securities. In our role as guarantor, we may be required to advance funds to the securitization trusts. We receive a guarantee fee in exchange for our guarantee. In certain of our K Certificate securitizations, we may also serve as master servicer. In our role as master servicer, we may be required to advance funds as long as such advances have not been deemed unrecoverable. In contrast to most single-family transactions, the rights to direct loss mitigation activities of the underlying loans and to purchase delinquent loans from the securitization trust are generally held by the investor in the most subordinate remaining securities issued by the non-Freddie Mac trust, and therefore we generally do not have the power to direct those activities unless we are the investor in the most subordinate remaining securities.
The economic performance of our K Certificate trusts is most significantly affected by the performance of the underlying loans. We generally do not consolidate our K Certificate securitization trusts that have subordination because we do not have the ability to direct the loss mitigation activities of the underlying loans, which is the most significant activity affecting the economic performance of the VIE.
When we sell loans in a senior subordinate K Certificate transaction, we derecognize the transferred loans and account for our guarantee to the nonconsolidated VIE. We account for our investments in the beneficial interests issued by the trusts used in our senior subordinate K Certificate transactions as investments in debt securities.
Other Securitization Products
We do not consolidate the trusts used to issue our other securitization products when we do not have the ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE. For those products, we account for our guarantee to the nonconsolidated VIE. We account for our investments in the beneficial interests issued by the trusts used in our other securitization products as investments in debt securities.
CRT Products
In Multifamily, we may transfer credit risk on certain mortgage loans that we own or guarantee by entering into MSCR note transactions, which are similar to STACR Trust note transactions in Single-Family. We do not consolidate the trusts used in MSCR note transactions and account for MSCR note transactions in the same manner as we account for STACR Trust note transactions.
We also obtain interests in various other entities created by third parties through the normal course of business that may be VIEs, such as through purchases of multifamily loans, guarantees of multifamily housing revenue bonds, as a derivative counterparty, or through other activities. To the extent that we were not involved in the design or creation of these VIEs, they are excluded from the table above. Our interests in these VIEs are generally passive in nature and are not expected to result in us obtaining a controlling financial interest in these VIEs in the future. As a result, we do not consolidate these VIEs and we account for our interests in these VIEs in the same manner that we account for our interests in other third-party transactions.
Investment Program, Proportional Amortization Method, Elected
Investments in Low Income Housing Tax Credits
We invest in LIHTC partnerships to support and preserve the supply of affordable housing. These investments do not provide us with a controlling financial interest in the underlying partnerships and we therefore do not consolidate these entities. We have elected to account for these investments using the proportional amortization method when applicable. The carrying amount of our investments in LIHTC partnerships is presented in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets and totaled $5.2 billion and $4.3 billion as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets, Policy Loans held by these trusts are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as mortgage loans held-for-investment. The corresponding securities held by third parties are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as debt. We extinguish the outstanding debt issued by the related consolidated trust and recognize gains or losses on debt extinguishment for the difference between the consideration paid and the debt carrying value when we purchase these securities as investments in our mortgage-related investments portfolio. Sales of these securities that were previously held as investments in our mortgage-related investments portfolio are accounted for as debt issuances.
Revenue from Contract with Customer
With the exception of commingled securities, our investments in, and guarantees of, securities issued by resecuritization trusts do not create any incremental exposure to loss because we already guarantee the underlying collateral. As a result, we do not receive any incremental guarantee fees in exchange for our guarantee, and, accordingly, we do not recognize any additional guarantee assets, guarantee obligations, or reserves for guarantee losses related to resecuritization trusts. In a typical multiclass resecuritization, we receive a one-time transaction fee which represents compensation for both the structuring and creation of the securities and for our ongoing administrative responsibilities to service the securities. We recognize the portion of the transaction fee related to creation of the securities immediately in earnings. We defer the portion of the fee related to ongoing administrative responsibilities and amortize it over the life of the associated trust.
When we issue commingled resecuritization products, our guarantee of the Fannie Mae securities used as collateral creates incremental exposure to loss because our guarantee covers timely payment of principal and interest on such products from underlying Fannie Mae securities. If Fannie Mae were to fail to make a payment on a Fannie Mae security that we resecuritized, we would be responsible for making the payment. However, we view the likelihood of being required to perform on our
guarantee of Fannie Mae securities as remote due to both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae being under the common control of FHFA, and due to Fannie Mae’s status as a GSE and the funding commitment available to it through its senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury.
Mortgage Loans
We own both single-family loans, which are secured by one- to four-unit residential properties, and multifamily loans, which are secured by properties with five or more residential rental units. Our single-family loans are primarily first lien, fixed-rate loans secured by the borrower's primary residence. We do not typically acquire loans that have experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination as of our acquisition date, although we may acquire such loans in connection with certain of our securitization activities or other mortgage-related guarantees.
Upon acquisition, we classify a loan as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. Loans that we have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future, including loans held by consolidated trusts and loans we intend to securitize using an entity we will consolidate, are classified as held-for-investment. Loans that we intend to sell are classified as held-for-sale.
Held-for-investment loans for which we have not elected the fair value option are reported on our consolidated balance sheets at their amortized cost basis, net of the allowance for credit losses. The amortized cost basis is based on a loan's outstanding UPB, net of deferred fees and other cost basis adjustments (including unamortized premiums and discounts, fees we receive or pay when we acquire loans, commitment-related derivative basis adjustments, hedge accounting-related basis adjustments, and other pricing adjustments), excluding accrued interest receivable. Accrued interest receivable for both held-for-investment and held-for-sale loans is separately presented on our consolidated balance sheets and excluded for the purposes of disclosure of the amortized cost basis of mortgage loans held-for-investment.
Held-for-sale loans for which we have not elected the fair value option are reported at lower-of-cost-or-fair-value determined on an individual loan basis on our consolidated balance sheets. Any excess of a held-for-sale loan's cost over its fair value is recognized as a valuation allowance in investment gains, net on our consolidated statements of income, with subsequent changes in this valuation allowance also being recorded in investment gains, net. Premiums, discounts, and other cost basis adjustments (including lower-of-cost-or-fair-value adjustments) are deferred and not amortized.
We elect the fair value option for certain multifamily loans. Loans for which we have elected the fair value option are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, with subsequent gains or losses related to changes in fair value reported in investment gains, net on our consolidated statements of income. All fees, upfront costs, and other cost basis adjustments are recognized in earnings as incurred.
Cash flows related to loans originally classified as held-for-investment are classified as either investing activities (e.g., principal repayments) or operating activities (e.g., interest payments received from borrowers included within net income) on our consolidated statements of cash flows. Cash flows related to loans originally classified as held-for-sale are classified as operating activities on our consolidated statements of cash flows.
We reclassify loans from held-for-investment to held-for-sale depending on our intent and ability to hold the loan for the foreseeable future. Upon reclassification from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, we perform a collectability assessment. When we determine that a loan to be reclassified has experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, the excess of the loan’s amortized cost basis over its fair value is written off against the allowance for credit losses prior to the reclassification. If the charge-off amount exceeds the existing allowance for credit losses amount, an additional provision for credit losses is recognized. Any remaining allowance for credit losses after the charge-off is reversed through provision for credit losses.
We reclassify loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment when we have both the intent and ability to hold the loan for the foreseeable future. Upon reclassification from held-for-sale to held-for-investment, we reverse the loan’s held-for-sale valuation allowance, if any, and establish an allowance for credit losses as needed.
When we purchase single-family or multifamily loans from the trust, we record an extinguishment of the corresponding portion of the debt issued by consolidated trusts and we reclassify the loans from mortgage loans held-for-investment by consolidated trusts to mortgage loans held-for-investment by Freddie Mac.
Credit Loss, Financial Instrument
Interest Income
We recognize interest income on an accrual basis except when we believe the collection of principal and interest in full is not reasonably assured, which generally occurs when a loan is three monthly payments or more past due, at which point we place the loan on non-accrual status unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection based upon an individual loan assessment. A loan is considered past due if a full payment of principal and interest is not received within one month of its due date. We charge off outstanding accrued interest receivable through interest income when loans are placed on non-accrual status and recognize interest income on a cash basis while a loan is on non-accrual status.
Cost basis adjustments on held-for-investment loans are amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method. No amortization is recognized during periods in which a loan is on non-accrual status.
A non-accrual loan is returned to accrual status when the collectability of principal and interest in full is reasonably assured. For single-family loans, we generally determine that collectability is reasonably assured when the loan returns to current payment status. For multifamily loans, the collectability of principal and interest is considered reasonably assured based on an analysis of the factors specific to the loan being assessed. Upon a loan's return to accrual status, all previously reversed interest income is recognized and amortization of any basis adjustments into interest income is resumed.
Allowance for Credit Losses
For financial assets measured at amortized cost, we recognize an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from or added to the amortized cost basis of the financial asset to present the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset on the balance sheet.
Allowance for Credit Losses Methodology
We recognize changes in the allowance for credit losses through provision or benefit for credit losses on our consolidated statements of income.
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Investment
Our allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans pertains to single-family and multifamily loans classified as held-for-investment for which we have not elected the fair value option. We measure the allowance for credit losses on a pooled basis when our loans share similar risk characteristics. We record charge-offs in the period in which a loan is deemed uncollectible. Proceeds received in excess of amounts previously written off are recorded as a decrease to non-interest expense on our consolidated statements of income.
Single-Family
We estimate the allowance for credit losses for single-family loans on a pooled basis using a discounted cash flow model that evaluates a variety of factors to estimate the cash flows we expect to collect. If we determine that foreclosure on the underlying
collateral is probable, we measure the allowance for credit losses for single-family loans based upon the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, adjusted for estimated proceeds from credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts.
The discounted cash flow model we use to estimate the single-family loan allowance for credit losses forecasts cash flows over the loan’s remaining contractual term, adjusted for expectations of prepayments. As a result, we do not revert to historical loss information for single-family loans. Cash flow estimates are discounted at the loan’s prepayment-adjusted effective interest rate, which is adjusted for projections in the underlying benchmark interest rate for adjustable-rate loans. We project cash flows we expect to collect using our historical experience (which includes the effects of natural disasters), such as historical default rates and severity of loss, based on loan characteristics, such as current LTV ratios, delinquency status, geography, and borrowers' credit scores. These cash flow estimates incorporate probability of default and severity of losses and are adjusted for current and forecasted economic conditions, such as current and forecasted interest rates and house price growth rates, and estimated recoveries from loss mitigation activities, credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts, and disposition of collateral, less estimated disposition costs.
Our estimate of expected credit losses is sensitive to changes in forecasted house price growth rates, which affect both the probability of default and severity of expected credit losses, and changes in forecasted interest rates, as declining (increasing) interest rates typically result in higher (lower) expected prepayments and a shorter (longer) estimated loan life, and therefore lower (higher) expected credit losses. Our forecast of house price growth rates leverages an internally based model and uses a nationwide house price growth forecast for the next three years. A Monte Carlo simulation generates many possible house price scenarios for up to 40 years for each MSA. These scenarios are used to estimate loan-level expected future cash flows and credit losses based on each loan’s individual characteristics. Our forecast of interest rates incorporates various interest rate scenarios over the remaining contractual life of the loan based on current interest rates and implied market volatilities.
These projections require significant management judgment. We rely on third parties to provide certain model inputs used in our projections. At loan delivery, the seller provides us with loan data, which includes borrower and loan characteristics and underwriting information. Each subsequent month, the servicers provide us with monthly loan-level servicing data, including delinquency and loss information.
We review the outputs of our model by considering qualitative factors such as current economic events and other external factors to determine whether the model outputs are consistent with our expectations. Further management adjustments may be necessary to take into consideration the qualitative factors that have occurred but that are not yet reflected in the factors used to derive the model outputs or the uncertainty inherent in our projections. Significant judgment is exercised in making these adjustments.
Credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts are obtained contemporaneously with, and in contemplation of, the origination of a financial instrument, and effectively travel with the financial instrument upon sale. Credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts include primary mortgage insurance, which provides us with loan-level protection up to a specified percentage.
Expected recoveries from credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts are considered in determining the allowance for loan losses as discussed above, resulting in a reduction in the recognized provision for credit losses by the amount of the expected recoveries. Subsequent to foreclosure and charge-off of the allowance for credit losses, we reclassify expected recoveries from credit enhancements that were not freestanding contracts and were previously offset against the allowance for credit losses as separate receivables. We do not consider potential recoveries from freestanding credit enhancement contracts when measuring our allowance for credit losses.
Multifamily
We estimate the allowance for credit losses for multifamily loans using a loss-rate method to estimate the net amount of cash flows we expect to collect over the loan's remaining contractual terms, adjusted for expectations of prepayments. As a result, we do not revert to historical loss information for multifamily loans. The loss-rate method is based on a probability of default and loss given default framework that estimates credit losses by considering a loan’s underlying characteristics, our historical experience (which includes the effects of natural disasters), and current and forecasted economic conditions. Loan characteristics considered by our model include vintage, loan term, current DSCR, current NOI, current LTV ratio, interest rate type, underlying property type, and property location. We simulate multiple forecast paths of economic variables, property values, and NOI over the loan's remaining contractual life. We also consider as model inputs expected recoveries from credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts.
Our loss rates incorporate our own historical loan performance data, along with published historical commercial loan performance data where our data might be limited. Except for cases of fraud and certain other types of borrower defaults, most multifamily loans are nonrecourse to the borrower. As a result, the cash flows of the underlying property (including any credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts) serve as the primary source of funds for repayment of the loan. For loans where we determined that the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, we measure the allowance for credit losses using the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell, adjusted for estimated proceeds from credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts. Factors considered by management in determining whether a borrower is experiencing financial
difficulty include the borrower’s current payment status and an evaluation of the underlying property's operating performance as represented by its current DSCR, its available credit enhancements, the current LTV ratio, the management of the underlying property, and the property's geographic location.
We review the outputs of our model considering qualitative factors such as current economic events and other factors not considered within the model to determine whether the model outputs are consistent with our expectations. Further management adjustments may be necessary to take into consideration the qualitative factors that have occurred but that are not yet reflected in the factors used to derive the model outputs or the uncertainty inherent in our projections. Significant judgment is exercised in making these adjustments.
Advances of Pre-foreclosure Costs
We may incur expenses related to a mortgage loan subsequent to its original acquisition but prior to foreclosure (pre-foreclosure costs). These expenses are incurred generally to protect or preserve our interest or legal right in or to the property prior to foreclosure, such as property taxes or homeowner's insurance premiums owed by the borrower. Many of these expenses are advanced by the servicer and are reimbursable from the borrower. If the borrower ultimately defaults, we reimburse the servicer for the advances it has made. Upon advance by the servicer, we recognize a receivable, which is included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets, for the amounts due from the borrower and a payable, which is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, for amounts due to the servicer. We recognize an allowance for credit losses for amounts that we do not ultimately expect to collect from the borrower.
Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
We recognize an allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures for our guarantees that are not measured at fair value and other off-balance sheet arrangements based on expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk through a present contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. We include this allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures within other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, with changes recognized through provision or benefit for credit losses on our consolidated statements of income.
Our methodologies for estimating the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures for our Single-Family and Multifamily guarantees are generally consistent with our methodologies for estimating the allowance for credit losses for single-family mortgage loans and multifamily mortgage loans, respectively.
We obtain credit enhancements for certain of our guarantees through the creation of unguaranteed subordinated securities issued by nonconsolidated securitization trusts that absorb first losses prior to us having to incur credit losses under our guarantee of the senior securities. We consider the effect of subordination and other credit enhancements that are not freestanding contracts when measuring the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures and, as a result, recognize such an allowance only if expected credit losses exceed the remaining amount of subordination. We have not recorded an allowance for credit losses on our guarantees of Fannie Mae securities due to the support provided to Fannie Mae by the U.S. government, the importance of Fannie Mae to the liquidity and stability of the U.S. housing market, and the long history of zero credit losses on Fannie Mae securities.
Loan Restructurings
Loan Restructurings
We evaluate all loan restructurings according to the accounting guidance for loan refinancing and restructuring to determine whether the restructuring should be accounted for as a new loan or a continuation of the existing loan. We derecognize the existing loan and account for the restructured loan as a new loan if the effective yield on the restructured loan is at least equal to the effective yield for comparable loans with similar collection risks and the modifications to the original loan are more than minor. If a loan restructuring does not meet these conditions, we carryforward the existing loan’s amortized cost basis and account for the restructured loan as a continuation of the existing loan. Substantially all of our loan restructurings involving borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are accounted for as a continuation of the existing loan.
The discounted cash flow model we use in measuring our Single-Family allowance for credit losses forecasts cash flows we expect to collect using our historical experience, including the effects of our loss mitigation activities involving borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. When we account for a loan restructuring as a continuation of the existing loan, we update the loan’s effective interest rate based on the restructured terms and recognize interest income prospectively using the new effective rate. We also update the prepayment-adjusted effective interest rate used to discount cash flows in measuring our allowance for credit losses to reflect the loan’s restructured terms. For loans that were restructured and accounted for as TDRs prior to our adoption of ASU 2022-02, and that have not been subsequently restructured, we continue to use the loan's prepayment-adjusted effective interest rate just prior to restructuring, with no adjustments for changes resulting from the restructuring. As a result, we continue to measure an allowance for credit losses for the economic concession granted to a borrower for changes in the timing and amount of contractual cash flows for such legacy TDR loans.
Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties Policies
Guarantees and Other Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
Our guarantee activities primarily consist of mortgage-related guarantees in which we agree to absorb the credit risk of mortgage loans or other mortgage-related assets. In exchange for providing this guarantee, we receive an upfront or ongoing guarantee fee that is designed to be commensurate with the risks assumed and that will, over the long-term, provide us with cash flows that are expected to exceed the credit-related and administrative expenses of the underlying financial instruments and also provide us with a return on the capital that would be needed to support the related credit risk. The profitability of our guarantee activities may vary and will depend on a number of factors, including our guarantee fee and the actual credit performance of the underlying financial instruments that we have guaranteed.
We do not separately recognize guarantees to consolidated VIEs as we have already recognized the assets and liabilities of those VIEs on our consolidated balance sheets. When we issue a guarantee to a nonconsolidated VIE or other third party that exposes us to incremental credit risk, we recognize both a guarantee obligation at fair value and the consideration we receive for providing the guarantee, which typically consists of a guarantee asset that represents the fair value of future guarantee fees. As a practical expedient, the measurement of the fair value of the guarantee obligation is set equal to the consideration we receive to provide the guarantee, and no gain or loss is recognized upon issuance of the guarantee. Subsequently, we recognize changes in the fair value of the guarantee asset in current period earnings and amortize the guarantee obligation into earnings as we are released from risk under the guarantee. We also recognize an allowance for expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk. See Note 6 for additional information on our allowance for credit losses on financial guarantees and other off-balance sheet credit exposures.
Investments in Securities
We currently classify and account for our securities as either available-for-sale or trading. Securities classified as trading are reported at fair value with changes in fair value included in investment gains, net, in our consolidated statements of income. Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value with changes in fair value included in AOCI, net of taxes. See Note 16 for additional information on how we determine the fair value of securities.
We record purchases and sales of non-mortgage-related securities on the trade date. We record purchases and sales of mortgage-related securities on the expected settlement date, with a corresponding derivative recorded on the trade date.
We recognize interest income using the effective interest method, which considers the contractual terms of the security. Deferred items, including premiums, discounts, and other basis adjustments, are amortized into interest income over the contractual lives of the securities.
We recognize interest income using the prospective effective interest method for securities that can contractually be prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that we may not recover substantially all of our recorded investment. Under this method, we recognize as interest income, over the expected life of the securities, the excess of the cash flows expected to be collected over the securities' carrying value. We update our estimates of expected cash flows periodically and recognize changes in the calculated effective interest rate on a prospective basis.
We classify the cash flows related to both available-for-sale and trading securities as investing activities because we hold these securities for investment purposes. In cases where the transfer of a security represents a secured borrowing, we classify the related cash flows as financing activities.
Gains and losses on the sale of securities are included in investment gains, net, including those gains (losses) reclassified into earnings from AOCI. We use the specific identification method for determining the cost basis of a security in computing the gain or loss.
Debt Securities Issued
Short-term and Long-term Debt
We report both short-term and long-term debt at amortized cost, with the exception of certain instruments for which we elected the fair value option. Deferred items, including premiums, discounts, issuance costs, and hedge accounting-related basis adjustments, are reported as a component of the amortized cost basis. These items are amortized and reported through interest expense using the effective interest method over the contractual life of the related indebtedness. Amortization of premiums, discounts, and issuance costs begins at the time of debt issuance. Amortization of hedge accounting-related basis adjustments begins upon the discontinuation of the related hedge relationship.
We elected the fair value option on long-term debt that contains embedded derivatives. Changes in the fair value of these debt obligations are recorded in investment gains, net, with any upfront costs and fees incurred or received in exchange for the issuance of the debt being recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred. Related interest expense continues to be reported as interest expense based on the stated terms of the debt securities. For additional information on our election of the fair value option, see Note 16.
When we repurchase or call outstanding debt securities, we recognize the difference between the amount paid to redeem the debt security and the carrying value in earnings as a component of investment gains, net. Contemporaneous transfers of cash between us and a creditor in connection with the issuance of a new debt security and satisfaction of an existing debt security are accounted for as either an extinguishment or a modification of an existing debt security. If the debt securities have substantially different terms, the transaction is accounted for as an extinguishment of the existing debt security. The issuance of a new debt security is recorded at fair value, fees paid to the creditor are expensed as incurred, and fees paid to third parties are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the life of the new debt security using the effective interest method. If the terms of the existing debt security and the new debt security are not substantially different, the transaction is accounted for as a modification of the existing debt. Fees paid to the creditor are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the life of the modified debt security using the effective interest method and fees paid to third parties are expensed as incurred.
We also engage in transactions whereby we enter into an agreement to sell and subsequently repurchase (or purchase and subsequently resell) agency securities. When these transactions involve securities issued by consolidated entities, they are treated as issuances and extinguishments of debt.
The Purchase Agreement limits the par value of our aggregate indebtedness, which may restrict the amount of debt we are allowed to issue to fund our operations. See Note 2 for information regarding restrictions on the amount of our indebtedness under the Purchase Agreement.
Derivatives
We evaluate whether financial instruments that we purchase or issue contain embedded derivatives. We generally elect to measure newly acquired or issued financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in earnings.
On our consolidated statements of cash flows, cash flows related to derivatives are classified as either operating activities (such as periodic settlements of interest payments) or investing activities (such as variation margin payments and cash flows related to the acquisition and termination of derivatives) depending on the nature of the activity. Cash flows related to physical settlement of forward commitments accounted for as derivative instruments are classified as operating, investing, or financing activities depending on the financial instruments to which they relate.
Derivatives, Methods of Accounting, Hedging Derivatives
We apply fair value hedge accounting to certain single-family mortgage loans where we hedge the changes in fair value of these loans attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate, using interest-rate swaps. We also apply fair value hedge accounting to certain issuances of debt where we hedge the changes in fair value of the debt attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate, using interest-rate swaps. Under the portfolio layer method fair value hedge accounting strategy, we hedge the changes in fair value of a portion of a closed pool of single-family mortgage loans that is not expected to be affected by prepayments, defaults, and other events affecting the timing and amount of cash flows. As part of this strategy, we have also elected to measure the change in fair value of the hedged item on the basis of the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows determined at the hedge inception and by assuming the hedged item has a term that reflects only the designated cash flows being hedged.
We apply hedge accounting to qualifying hedge relationships. A qualifying hedge relationship exists when changes in the fair value of a derivative hedging instrument are expected to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged during the term of the hedge relationship. No amounts have been excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. To assess hedge effectiveness, we use a statistical regression analysis.
At inception of the hedge relationship, we prepare formal contemporaneous documentation of our risk management objective and strategies for undertaking the hedge.
If a hedge relationship qualifies for fair value hedge accounting, all changes in fair value of the derivative hedging instrument, including interest accruals, are recognized in the same consolidated statements of income line item used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the hedged item, mortgage loans and debt, attributable to the risk being hedged are recognized in interest income and interest expense, respectively, along with the changes in the fair value of the respective derivative hedging instruments.
Changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged are recognized as a cumulative basis adjustment against the mortgage loans and debt. The cumulative basis adjustments are amortized to the same consolidated statements of income line item used to present the changes in fair value of the hedged item using the effective interest method considering the contractual terms of the hedged item, with amortization beginning no later than the period in which hedge accounting was discontinued.
Derivatives, Offsetting Fair Value Amounts, Policy
We use master netting and collateral agreements to reduce our credit risk exposure to our OTC derivative counterparties for interest-rate swap and option-based derivatives. Master netting agreements provide for the netting of amounts receivable and payable from an individual counterparty, as well as posting of collateral in the form of cash, Treasury securities or agency mortgage-related or debt securities, or a combination of both by either the counterparty or us, depending on which party is in a liability position. On a daily basis, the market value of each counterparty's derivatives outstanding is calculated to determine the amount of our net credit exposure, which is equal to the market value of derivatives in a net gain position by counterparty after giving consideration to collateral posted. In the event a counterparty defaults on its obligations under the derivative agreement and the default is not remedied in the manner prescribed in the agreement, we have the right under the agreement to sell the collateral. As a result, our use of master netting and collateral agreements reduces our exposure to our counterparties in the event of default. We offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. Non-cash collateral held is not recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as we do not obtain effective control over the collateral, and non-cash collateral posted is not derecognized from our consolidated balance sheets as we do not relinquish effective control over the collateral. Therefore, non-cash collateral held or posted is not presented as an offset against derivative assets or derivative liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 10 for additional information on our collateralized arrangements. Although it is our practice not to repledge assets held as collateral, these agreements may allow us or our counterparties to repledge all or a portion of the collateral.
Repurchase and Resale Agreements and Dollar Roll Transactions
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
As an investor, we enter into arrangements to purchase securities under agreements to subsequently resell the identical or substantially the same securities to our counterparty. Our counterparties to these transactions are required to pledge the purchased securities as collateral for their obligation to repurchase those securities at a later date. While such transactions involve the legal transfer of securities, they are accounted for as secured financings because the transferor does not relinquish effective control over the securities transferred. These agreements may allow us to repledge all, or a portion, of the collateral pledged to us, and we may repledge such collateral periodically, although it is not typically our practice to repledge collateral that has been pledged to us.
We consider the types of securities being pledged to us as collateral when determining how much we lend in transactions involving securities purchased under agreements to resell. Additionally, we regularly review the market values of these securities compared to amounts loaned in an effort to manage our exposure to losses and we reasonably expect the borrower to continue to replenish the collateral to meet the requirements of the contract. As of December 31, 2025, all of our securities purchased under agreements to resell were fully collateralized.
We utilize the GSD/FICC as a clearinghouse to transact many of our trades involving securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and other non-mortgage related securities. As a clearing member of GSD/FICC, we are required to post initial and variation margin payments and are exposed to the counterparty credit risk of GSD/FICC (including its clearing members). In the event a clearing member fails and causes losses to the GSD/FICC clearing system, we could be subject to the loss of the margin that we have posted to the GSD/FICC. Moreover, our exposure could exceed that amount, as members are generally required to cover losses caused by defaulting members on a pro rata basis. It is difficult to estimate our maximum exposure under these transactions, as this would require an assessment of transactions that we and other members of the GSD/FICC may execute in the future.
We provide financing to investors in Freddie Mac securities to increase liquidity and expand the investor base for those securities. These transactions differ from the securities purchased under agreements to resell that we use for liquidity purposes as the counterparties we face may not be major financial institutions and we are exposed to greater counterparty credit risk for these institutions. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, $2.1 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, of our securities purchased under agreements to resell were used to provide financing to investors in Freddie Mac securities.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are effectively collateralized borrowings where we sell securities with an agreement to repurchase such securities at a future date. We are required to pledge the sold securities to the counterparties to these transactions as collateral for our obligation to repurchase these securities at a later date. Similar to the securities purchased under agreements to resell transactions, these transactions involve the legal transfer of securities. However, they are accounted for as secured financings because the transferor does not relinquish effective control over the securities transferred. These agreements may allow our counterparties to repledge all or a portion of the collateral.
Stockholders' Equity
Treasury, as the holder of the senior preferred stock, is entitled to receive quarterly cash dividends, when, as, and if declared by our Board of Directors. The dividends we have paid to Treasury on the senior preferred stock have been declared by, and paid at the direction of, the Conservator, acting as successor to the rights, titles, powers, and privileges of the Board of Directors. See Note 2 for additional information concerning our senior preferred stock dividends.
We account for the warrant in permanent equity. At issuance on September 7, 2008, we recognized the warrant at fair value, and we do not recognize subsequent changes in fair value while the warrant remains classified in equity. We recorded an aggregate fair value of $2.3 billion for the warrant as a component of additional paid-in-capital. We derived the fair value of the warrant using a modified Black-Scholes model. If the warrant is exercised, the stated value of the common stock issued will be reclassified to common stock on our consolidated balance sheets. The warrant was determined to be in-substance non-voting common stock, because the warrant's exercise price of $0.00001 per share is considered non-substantive (compared to the market price of our common stock). As a result, the shares associated with the warrant are included in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. The weighted average shares of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 included shares of common stock that would be issuable upon full exercise of the warrant issued to Treasury.
Stockholders' Equity Note, Redeemable Preferred Stock, Issue, Policy
No cash was received from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement in 2025 because we had positive net worth at December 31, 2024, March 31, 2025, June 30, 2025, and September 30, 2025 and, consequently, FHFA did not request a draw on our behalf in 2025. At December 31, 2025, our assets exceeded our liabilities under GAAP; therefore, no draw is being requested from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement.
Common Stock Warrant
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement described in Note 2, on September 7, 2008, we issued a warrant to purchase common stock to Treasury, in partial consideration of Treasury's commitment to provide funds to us.
The warrant may be exercised in whole or in part at any time on or before September 7, 2028, by delivery to us of a notice of exercise, payment of the exercise price of $0.00001 per share, and the warrant. If the market price of one share of our common stock is greater than the exercise price, then, instead of paying the exercise price, Treasury may elect to receive shares equal to the value of the warrant (or portion thereof being canceled) pursuant to the formula specified in the warrant. Upon exercise of the warrant, Treasury may assign the right to receive the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise to any other person.
We account for the warrant in permanent equity. At issuance on September 7, 2008, we recognized the warrant at fair value, and we do not recognize subsequent changes in fair value while the warrant remains classified in equity. We recorded an aggregate fair value of $2.3 billion for the warrant as a component of additional paid-in-capital. We derived the fair value of the warrant using a modified Black-Scholes model. If the warrant is exercised, the stated value of the common stock issued will be reclassified to common stock on our consolidated balance sheets. The warrant was determined to be in-substance non-voting common stock, because the warrant's exercise price of $0.00001 per share is considered non-substantive (compared to the market price of our common stock). As a result, the shares associated with the warrant are included in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. The weighted average shares of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 included shares of common stock that would be issuable upon full exercise of the warrant issued to Treasury.
Preferred Stock
We have the option to redeem our preferred stock on specified dates, at their redemption price plus dividends accrued through the redemption date. However, without the consent of Treasury, we are restricted from making payments to purchase or redeem preferred stock as well as paying any preferred dividends, other than dividends on the senior preferred stock. All 24 classes of preferred stock are perpetual and non-cumulative, and carry no significant voting rights or rights to purchase
additional Freddie Mac stock or securities. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of preferred stock are charged to additional paid-in capital.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed as net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares for the period. The weighted average common shares for the period includes the weighted average number of shares that are associated with the warrant for our common stock issued to Treasury pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. These shares are included since the warrant is unconditionally exercisable by the holder at a minimal cost. We deduct dividends or increases in liquidation preference attributable to the senior preferred stock from net income attributable to common stockholders in the period in which such amounts are determinable.
Our diluted earnings per common share is the same as our basic earnings per common share because we had no common equivalent shares outstanding during the periods presented which could have had a dilutive or antidilutive effect.
Income Taxes
Income Tax Expense
Total income tax expense includes:
n    Current income tax expense, which represents the amount of federal tax paid or payable to (or refundable from) the Internal Revenue Service, including interest and penalties and amounts accrued for unrecognized tax benefits, if any, and
n    Deferred income tax expense, which represents the net change in the deferred tax asset or liability balance during the year, including any change in the valuation allowance.
Deferred Tax Assets, Net
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes for financial reporting purposes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based upon the expected future tax consequences of existing temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax reporting basis of assets and liabilities using enacted statutory tax rates as well as tax net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, if any. To the extent tax laws change, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted in the period that the tax change is enacted. The realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient taxable income.
We recognize a tax position taken or expected to be taken (and any associated interest and penalties) if it is more likely than not that it will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. We measure the tax position at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Segment Reporting
Segment
Description
Single-Family
Reflects results from our purchase, securitization, and guarantee of single-family loans, our investments in single-family loans and mortgage-related securities, the management of Single-Family mortgage credit risk and market risk, and any results of our treasury function that are not allocated to each segment.

Multifamily
Reflects results from our purchase, securitization, and guarantee of multifamily loans, our investments in multifamily loans and mortgage-related securities, and the management of Multifamily mortgage credit risk and market risk.


Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Disclosures
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and sets forth disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. This guidance applies whenever other accounting guidance requires or permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either in the principal market for the asset or liability, or, in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
We use fair value measurements for the initial recording of certain assets and liabilities and periodic remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities on a recurring or non-recurring basis.
Fair Value Measurements
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows in priority order:
n    Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation techniques are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
n    Level 2 - Inputs to the valuation techniques are based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
n    Level 3 - One or more inputs to the valuation technique are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
We use quoted market prices and valuation techniques that seek to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Our inputs are based on the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.