XML 43 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Discontinued Operations
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups [Abstract]  
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued Operations
 
From time to time, we may decide to sell a property. We may make a decision to dispose of a property when it is vacant as a result of tenants vacating space, tenants electing not to renew their leases, tenant insolvency, or lease rejection in the bankruptcy process. In such cases, we assess whether we can obtain the highest value from the property by selling it, as opposed to re-leasing it. We may also sell a property when we receive an unsolicited offer or negotiate a price for an investment that is consistent with our strategy for that investment. When it is appropriate to do so, we classify the property as an asset held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet and the current and prior period results of operations of the property are reclassified as discontinued operations.

The results of operations for properties that are held for sale or have been sold and with which we have no continuing involvement are reflected in the consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations and are summarized as follows (in thousands, net of tax):
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Revenues
$
28,951

 
$
27,137

 
$
28,973

Expenses
(19,984
)
 
(23,895
)
 
(28,655
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(2,415
)
 

 

Gain on deconsolidation of a subsidiary

 

 
1,008

Gain (loss) on sale of real estate
40,043

 
(5,015
)
 
(3,391
)
Impairment charges
(8,415
)
 
(22,962
)
 
(11,838
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
$
38,180

 
$
(24,735
)
 
$
(13,903
)

 
2013During the year ended December 31, 2013, we sold seven domestic properties for a total of $22.7 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a net gain on these sales of $0.6 million, excluding impairment charges totaling $3.9 million and $0.2 million previously recognized during 2013 and 2012, respectively. We used a portion of the proceeds to repay the related mortgage loan obligation of $5.7 million and recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million.

Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, an entity in which we, two of our employees (Note 4) and a third party owned 38.3%, 1.7% and 60.0% respectively, and which we consolidated, sold 19 of its 20 self-storage properties for a total of $112.3 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $39.6 million, inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $24.4 million. In connection with the sale, we used a portion of the proceeds to repay the aggregate related mortgage loan obligations of $45.1 million and recognized a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.5 million, inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $1.5 million. In connection with the sale, we made a distribution to noncontrolling interest holders of $40.8 million, representing their share of the net proceeds from the sale.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we also sold our hotel for $3.7 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a net loss on the sale of $0.2 million, excluding impairment charges of $1.1 million and $10.5 million previously recognized during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we entered into contracts to sell nine properties for a total of $117.5 million. In connection with these potential sales, we recognized impairment charges totaling $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 to reduce the carrying values of the properties to their selling prices. At December 31, 2013, these properties were classified as Assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet (Note 5). We completed the sale of six of these properties in January 2014. There can be no assurance that the remaining properties will be sold at the contracted prices, or at all.

In connection with those sales that are deemed businesses, we allocated goodwill totaling $13.1 million to the cost basis of the properties, for our Real Estate Ownership segment based on the relative fair value at the time of sale or when contracted for sale (Note 9).

2012 During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold 13 domestic properties for $44.8 million, net of selling costs, and recognized an aggregate net loss on these sales of $1.4 million, excluding impairment charges of $12.5 million recognized in 2012 and $11.8 million previously recognized during 2011.
 
We also sold a property in December 2012 that we acquired in the CPA®:15 Merger (Note 3), which was leased to BE Aerospace. We sold the property for $25.3 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a net loss on this sale of $0.5 million.
 
In December 2012, we entered into a contract to sell a domestic property that we acquired in the CPA®:15 Merger for $1.4 million. We completed the sale of this property in January 2013.  At December 31, 2012, this property was classified within Assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet.
 
In connection with those sales that are deemed businesses, we allocated goodwill totaling $3.2 million to the cost basis of the properties, for our Real Estate Ownership segment based on the relative fair value at the time of sale (Note 9).

2011 During the year ended December 31, 2011, we sold seven domestic properties for $12.5 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a net loss on these sales of $3.4 million, excluding previously recognized impairment charges of less than $0.1 million.
 
In September 2011, one of our subsidiaries consented to a court order appointing a receiver when the subsidiary stopped making payments on the non-recourse debt obligation on a property after the tenant vacated the property. As we no longer had control over the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this subsidiary following possession of the property by the receiver, we deconsolidated the subsidiary during the third quarter of 2011. As of the date of deconsolidation, the property had a carrying value of $5.3 million, reflecting the impact of impairment charges totaling $5.6 million recognized during the fourth quarter of 2010, and the related non-recourse mortgage loan had an outstanding balance of $6.3 million. In connection with the deconsolidation, we recognized a gain of $1.0 million during the third quarter of 2011. We believe that our retained interest in this deconsolidated entity had no value at the date of deconsolidation.