XML 44 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The financial assets and liabilities that the Company measures at fair value on a recurring basis based on the fair value hierarchy, as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 are presented below:
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
June 30, 2016
 
June 30, 2015
 
June 30, 2016
 
June 30, 2015
 
June 30, 2016
 
June 30, 2015
Financial assets and liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recurring fair value measurements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$

 
$

 
$
9.2

 
$
12.4

 
$

 
$

Total Assets

 

 
9.2

 
12.4

 

 

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forward contracts
$

 
$

 
$
7.3

 
$
6.3

 
$

 
$

Interest rate swap contracts

 

 
30.0

 

 

 

Contingent consideration - business combinations

 

 

 

 
0.7

 
0.9

Total Liabilities
$

 
$

 
$
37.3

 
$
6.3

 
$
0.7

 
$
0.9

Total recurring fair value measurements
$

 
$

 
$
(28.1
)
 
$
6.1

 
$
(0.7
)
 
$
(0.9
)

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments estimated as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 are presented below:
 
June 30, 2016
 
June 30, 2015
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Coty Credit Agreements
$
4,149.6

 
$
4,106.9

 
$

 
$

Prior Coty Inc. Credit Facility

 

 
2,611.5

 
2,614.2

Dividends payable
1.8

 
1.5

 
1.4

 
1.1


The Company has concluded that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable, certain accrued expenses, and short-term debt approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Foreign exchange contracts—The Company uses currency spot and forward rates to value the foreign exchange contracts, which were obtained from an independent pricing service. Based on the assumptions used to value foreign exchange contracts at fair value, these assets and/or liabilities are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Interest rate swap contracts—The fair values of the Company’s interest rate swap contracts were determined using an industry-standard valuation model, which is based on the income approach.  The significant observable inputs to the model, such as swap yield curves and LIBOR forward rates, were obtained from independent pricing services. Based on the assumptions used to estimate the interest rate swap contracts, these assets and/or liabilities are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Contingent consideration - business combinations — The Company uses an industry standard valuation model within the option pricing framework to value the contingent consideration. The inputs used to measure the fair value included weighted net sales projections through the settlement date of the contingent consideration, revenue volatility using comparable companies' historical performance and a present value calculation to discount the expected settlement. Based on the assumptions used to value the contingent consideration, these liabilities are categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Coty Credit Agreement—The Company uses the market approach to value the Coty Credit Agreement. The Company obtains market values for comparable instruments from independent pricing services and infers the fair value of these debt instruments. Based on the assumptions used to value these liabilities at fair value, these debt instruments are categorized a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Prior Coty Inc. Credit Facilities —The Company uses the income approach to value the Prior Coty Inc. Credit Facilities. The Company uses a present value calculation to discount interest payments and the final maturity payment on these liabilities using a discounted cash flow model based on observable inputs. The Company discounts these debt instruments based on what the current market rates would offer the Company as of the reporting date. Based on the assumptions used to value these liabilities at fair value, these debt instruments are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Dividends payable — The Company uses the income approach to value the long-term portion of Dividends Payable by utilizing a present value calculation to discount the settlements of the long-term portion of Dividends Payable which is calculated using a discounted cash flow model based on observable inputs. The Company discounts the liability based on an internally developed discount rate as of the reporting date. Based on the assumptions used to value the long-term portion of Dividends Payable at fair value, this debt is categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.