COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]	16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES *Noncontrolling Interests* The Company has the right to purchase the noncontrolling interests in certain subsidiaries from the noncontrolling interest holders (each such right, a “Call right”) at certain points in time. On August 23, 2013, the Company exercised its Call right for 7% of a certain Hong Kong subsidiary from the noncontrolling interest, which the Company intends to consummate on January 10, 2014. The Company estimates it will pay approximately $4.4 for this 7%. *Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests* On September 20, 2013, the Company and the non-controlling interest holder in the Company’s subsidiary in the United Arab Emirates (“UAE Subsidiary”) amended the shareholder agreement governing the Company’s UAE Subsidiary. As of July 1, 2014, the amendment will reduce the percentage of the Company’s Call right and percentage of the non-controlling interest holder’s put right to sell the non-controlling interest to the Company. As part of the amendment, the Company exercised its Call right for 7% of the UAE Subsidiary, which the Company intends to consummate on July 1, 2014. The Company estimates it will pay approximately $16.6 for this 7%. The Company also has the ability to exercise the call right for the remaining noncontrolling interest of 33% on July 1, 2028, with such transaction to close on July 1, 2029. Legal Matters The Company is involved, from time to time, in litigation, other regulatory actions and other legal proceedings incidental to the business. However, management’s assessment of the Company’s current litigation, regulatory actions and other legal proceedings could change in light of the discovery of facts with respect to litigation, regulatory actions or other proceedings pending against the Company not presently known to the Company or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which are not in accord with management’s evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation, regulatory actions and legal proceedings. On December 21, 2012, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”) results of the Company’s internal due diligence review conducted with the advice of outside counsel regarding certain export transactions from January 2008 through March 2012. In particular, the Company disclosed information relating to overall compliance with U.S. Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”). In its submission, the Company has provided OEE with an explanation of the activities that led to the sales of its products in Syria. In addition, the Company disclosed that prior to January 2010 some of its subsidiary’s sales to Syria were made to a party that was designated as a target of U.S. economic sanctions by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). The Company does not believe these sales constituted a violation of U.S. trade sanctions administered by OFAC. The Company also notified the Office of Foreign Assets Control of its voluntary disclosure to the OEE. On June 28, 2013, the Company submitted the final voluntary disclosure to the OEE which disclosed information relating to overall compliance with U.S. export control laws by a majority-owned subsidiary in the UAE, and the nature and quantity of re-exports to Syria that the Company believes may constitute violations of the EAR. The disclosure addressed the above described findings and the remedial actions the Company has taken to date. The OEE is currently reviewing the Company’s final voluntary disclosure. OEE may conclude that the Company’s actions resulted in violations of U.S. export control law and warrant the imposition of penalties that could include fines, termination of the Company’s ability to export its products and/or referral for criminal prosecution. The penalties may be imposed against the Company and/or its management. Also, disclosure of the Company’s conduct and any fines or other action relating to this conduct could harm the Company’s reputation and indirectly have a material adverse effect on its business. The Company cannot predict when OEE will complete its review or whether it will impose penalties. On January 14, 2013, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Antiboycott Compliance (“OAC”) additional results of the Company’s internal due diligence review. In particular, the Company disclosed information relating to overall compliance with U.S. antiboycott laws by a majority-owned subsidiary in the UAE, including with respect to the former inclusion of a legend on invoices, confirming that the corresponding goods did not contain materials of Israeli origin. A number of the invoices involved U.S. origin goods. The Company believes inclusions of this legend may constitute violations of U.S. antiboycott laws. On June 28, 2013, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the OAC the final results of the Company’s internal due diligence review. The Company’s investigation is continuing and, once the Company completes its review, the Company will supplement the initial voluntary report by filing a final disclosure with OAC. The disclosure addressed the above described findings and the remedial actions the Company has taken to date. Penalties for EAR violations can be significant and civil penalties can be imposed on a strict liability basis, without any showing of knowledge or willfulness. OEE and OAC each have wide discretion to settle claims for violations. The Company believes that a penalty or penalties that would result in a material loss are reasonably possible. Irrespective of any penalty, the Company could suffer other adverse effects on its business as a result of any violations or the potential violations, including legal costs and harm to its reputation, and the Company also will incur costs associated with its efforts to improve its compliance procedures. The Company has not established a reserve for potential penalties. The Company does not know whether OEE or OAC will assess a penalty or what the amount of any penalty would be, if a penalty or penalties were assessed.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Noncontrolling Interests

The Company has the right to purchase the noncontrolling interests in certain subsidiaries from the noncontrolling interest holders (each such right, a “Call right”) at certain points in time. On August 23, 2013, the Company exercised its Call right for 7% of a certain Hong Kong subsidiary from the noncontrolling interest, which the Company intends to consummate on January 10, 2014. The Company estimates it will pay approximately $4.4 for this 7%.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

On September 20, 2013, the Company and the non-controlling interest holder in the Company’s subsidiary in the United Arab Emirates (“UAE Subsidiary”) amended the shareholder agreement governing the Company’s UAE Subsidiary. As of July 1, 2014, the amendment will reduce the percentage of the Company’s Call right and percentage of the non-controlling interest holder’s put right to sell the non-controlling interest to the Company. As part of the amendment, the Company exercised its Call right for 7% of the UAE Subsidiary, which the Company intends to consummate on July 1, 2014. The Company estimates it will pay approximately $16.6 for this 7%. The Company also has the ability to exercise the call right for the remaining noncontrolling interest of 33% on July 1, 2028, with such transaction to close on July 1, 2029.

Legal Matters

The Company is involved, from time to time, in litigation, other regulatory actions and other legal proceedings incidental to the business. However, management’s assessment of the Company’s current litigation, regulatory actions and other legal proceedings could change in light of the discovery of facts with respect to litigation, regulatory actions or other proceedings pending against the Company not presently known to the Company or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which are not in accord with management’s evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation, regulatory actions and legal proceedings.

On December 21, 2012, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”) results of the Company’s internal due diligence review conducted with the advice of outside counsel regarding certain export transactions from January 2008 through March 2012. In particular, the Company disclosed information relating to overall compliance with U.S. Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”). In its submission, the Company has provided OEE with an explanation of the activities that led to the sales of its products in Syria. In addition, the Company disclosed that prior to January 2010 some of its subsidiary’s sales to Syria were made to a party that was designated as a target of U.S. economic sanctions by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). The Company does not believe these sales constituted a violation of U.S. trade sanctions administered by OFAC. The Company also notified the Office of Foreign Assets Control of its voluntary disclosure to the OEE.

On June 28, 2013, the Company submitted the final voluntary disclosure to the OEE which disclosed information relating to overall compliance with U.S. export control laws by a majority-owned subsidiary in the UAE, and the nature and quantity of re-exports to Syria that the Company believes may constitute violations of the EAR. The disclosure addressed the above described findings and the remedial actions the Company has taken to date.

The OEE is currently reviewing the Company’s final voluntary disclosure. OEE may conclude that the Company’s actions resulted in violations of U.S. export control law and warrant the imposition of penalties that could include fines, termination of the Company’s ability to export its products and/or referral for criminal prosecution. The penalties may be imposed against the Company and/or its management. Also, disclosure of the Company’s conduct and any fines or other action relating to this conduct could harm the Company’s reputation and indirectly have a material adverse effect on its business. The Company cannot predict when OEE will complete its review or whether it will impose penalties.

On January 14, 2013, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Antiboycott Compliance (“OAC”) additional results of the Company’s internal due diligence review. In particular, the Company disclosed information relating to overall compliance with U.S. antiboycott laws by a majority-owned subsidiary in the UAE, including with respect to the former inclusion of a legend on invoices, confirming that the corresponding goods did not contain materials of Israeli origin. A number of the invoices involved U.S. origin goods. The Company believes inclusions of this legend may constitute violations of U.S. antiboycott laws. On June 28, 2013, the Company voluntarily disclosed to the OAC the final results of the Company’s internal due diligence review. The Company’s investigation is continuing and, once the Company completes its review, the Company will supplement the initial voluntary report by filing a final disclosure with OAC. The disclosure addressed the above described findings and the remedial actions the Company has taken to date.

Penalties for EAR violations can be significant and civil penalties can be imposed on a strict liability basis, without any showing of knowledge or willfulness. OEE and OAC each have wide discretion to settle claims for violations. The Company believes that a penalty or penalties that would result in a material loss are reasonably possible. Irrespective of any penalty, the Company could suffer other adverse effects on its business as a result of any violations or the potential violations, including legal costs and harm to its reputation, and the Company also will incur costs associated with its efforts to improve its compliance procedures. The Company has not established a reserve for potential penalties. The Company does not know whether OEE or OAC will assess a penalty or what the amount of any penalty would be, if a penalty or penalties were assessed.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.

+ References+ Details