XML 54 R32.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Reverse Stock Split

Reverse Stock Split

On October 13, 2016, the Company filed Articles of Amendment to its charter (the Articles of Amendment), with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland to effect a one-for-ten reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the Reverse Stock Split). The Reverse Stock Split was duly approved by the Board of Directors of the Company without stockholder approval in accordance with the authority conferred by Section 2-309(e)(2) of the Maryland General Corporation Law and Article IV, Section 6 of the Company's charter. Pursuant to the Articles of Amendment, effective as of the close of business on October 13, 2016, each outstanding share of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, was automatically combined into 1/10th of share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Fractional share holdings were rounded up to the nearest whole number. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company was reduced to approximately 9.5 million shares.

Each stockholder's percentage ownership in the Company and proportional voting power remained unchanged immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, except for minor changes resulting from the rounding up of fractional shares. The rights and privileges of stockholders were also unaffected by the Reverse Stock Split. There was no change to the number of authorized shares of the Company's common stock as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Accordingly, all share and per share information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been restated to retroactively show the effect of the Reverse Stock Split.

 

 

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, (ASU 2015-03), the Company reclassified $1.7 million from Prepaid expenses and other current assets to Treximet Secured Notes - current, $4.0 million from Other assets to Convertible notes - long-term and $6.2 million from Other assets to Treximet Secured Notes - long-term on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015.

 

 

 

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), applied on a consistent basis.

  

 

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. 

 

 

Management's Estimates and Assumptions

Management's Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company reviews all significant estimates affecting the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis and records the effect of any necessary adjustments prior to their issuance. Significant estimates of the Company include: revenue recognition, sales allowances such as returns on product sales, government program rebates, customer coupon redemptions, wholesaler/pharmacy discounts, product service fees, rebates and chargebacks, sales commissions; useful lives of amortizable intangible assets; provisions for income taxes; uncertain tax positions, and realizability of deferred tax assets; expected future cash flows used in evaluating intangible assets for impairment and for determining the Company's liquidity and going concern analysis; stock-based compensation; and the allocation of the purchase price for acquired assets and businesses, including the fair value of contingent consideration. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates to ensure that these estimates appropriately reflect changes in the Company's business and new information as it becomes available. If historical experience and other factors used by management to make these estimates do not reasonably reflect future activity, the Company's consolidated financial statements could be materially impacted.

 

 

 

Business Acquisitions

Business Acquisitions

Acquired businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting for acquired businesses requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, with limited exceptions, and that the fair value of acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D), be recorded on the balance sheet. Also, transaction costs are expensed as incurred. Any excess of the acquisition consideration over the assigned values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Contingent consideration is included within the acquisition cost and is recognized at its fair value on the acquisition date. A liability resulting from contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved and changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. If the acquired net assets do not constitute a business under the acquisition method of accounting, the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition and no goodwill is recognized. In an asset acquisition, the amount allocated to acquired IPR&D with no alternative future is charged to expense at the acquisition date.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values due to their short maturity periods. The fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration is based on estimated discounted future cash flows and assessment of the probability of occurrence of potential future events. The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market prices, if available, or estimated discounted future cash flows.

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include certain money-market funds with maturities of three months or less when purchased.

The restricted cash amount at December 31, 2015 consisted of amounts escrowed for the purchase of Zohydro ER with BeadTek. In accordance with the asset purchase agreement, the Company had deposited $10.0 million in an escrow fund to be held for a period of 12 months from the closing date as a security to pay, or be applied against, any losses incurred by the Company that are subject to the general representations, warranties and indemnification obligations of Zogenix. The Company was considered to be the legal and tax owner of the fund until the expiration of the escrow period of 12 months. Accordingly, the amount of $10.0 million in the escrow fund was recognized as restricted cash and consideration payable to Zogenix. Restricted cash and the restricted cash payable are presented separately under current assets and current liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets. The conditions for the release of this escrow had been satisfied during the year ended December 31, 2016 and therefore the restricted cash has been released to Zogenix. See Note 4, Business Combinations and Other Acquisitions, for additional information.

 

 

 

Concentration of Credit Risk and Economic Dependency

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Economic Dependency

The financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable.

The Company invests its excess cash in high quality, money market instruments. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with a major financial institution. At times, such amounts may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any significant losses on its cash or cash equivalents.

The Company's accounts receivable primarily represent amounts due from drug wholesalers, retail drug stores, mass merchandisers and grocery store pharmacies in the United States. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of customers and does not require collateral. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for potential credit losses based on the aging of accounts receivable, historical bad debts experience, and changes in customer payment patterns. Accounts receivables balances are written off against the allowance when it is probable that the receivable will not be collected. The Company primarily sold to three major customers in 2016 and 2015. See Note 15, Concentrations, for additional information. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $500,000 and $15,000, respectively.

The Company relies on certain materials used in its development and manufacturing processes, some of which are procured from a single source. Most of the Company's manufacturing arrangements are not subject to long-term agreements and generally may be terminated by either party without penalty at any time. For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 42% of the inventory purchases, were from three primary suppliers - Recro Gainesville, LLC, Aphena Pharma Solutions and Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC, allocated 16%, 14% and 12%, respectively.  For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 25% of the inventory purchases were from two primary suppliers - GSK and Aphena Pharma Solutions, allocated 15% and 10%, respectively.  The Company believes that it has good relationships with its current suppliers, and could secure the services of alternative suppliers if necessary or required.

 

Inventories

Inventories

Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by using the specific identification method. Allowances for slow-moving, obsolete, and/or declines in the value of inventory are determined based on management's assessments. Sample inventory is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets and are expensed to selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss when the sample units are distributed to the Company's sales representatives.

The Company evaluates the carrying value of inventories on a regular basis, taking into account such factors as historical and anticipated future sales compared with quantities on hand, the price the Company expects to obtain for products in their respective markets compared with historical cost and the remaining shelf life of goods on hand.

 

Property, Equipment and Depreciation

Property, Equipment and Depreciation

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which ranges from three to eight years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the non-cancelable term of the operating lease or their economic useful lives.  Maintenance and repairs are charged against earnings when incurred. Additions and improvements that extend the economic useful life of the asset are capitalized. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the respective accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in current earnings.

 

 

 

Goodwill

Goodwill

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually in December and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition consideration over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  The Company has determined that it operates in a single segment and has a single reporting unit associated with the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products. The test for goodwill impairment is a two-step process. Step 1 is a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, the Company reports Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.  Under such evaluation, if the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, the impairment loss is recognized as an operating expense as the amount equal to the excess.  During the testing of goodwill for impairment during the year ended December 31, 2016, it was noted that the Company's carrying value exceeded its fair value and therefore the Company failed Step 1 and performed Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 of the impairment test determined a $23.8 million impairment charge for goodwill. See Note 9, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for further information.

 

 

 

Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with finite useful lives consist primarily of purchased developed technology and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from 3 to 18 years. The estimated useful lives associated with finite-lived intangible assets are consistent with the estimated lives of the associated products and may be modified when circumstances warrant. Intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. The amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.

The fair value of IPR&D acquired through a business combination is capitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the completion or abandonment of the related research and development activities. IPR&D is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or when events or circumstances indicate that the fair value may be below the carrying value of the asset. If and when development is complete, which generally occurs when regulatory approval to market a product is obtained, the associated assets would be deemed finite-lived and would then be amortized over their estimated useful lives.

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded impairment charges of $31.4 million and $24.4 million, respectively.  See Note 9, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for further information.

 

 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and finite lived intangibles, subject to amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. If any long-lived assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

 

 

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are reported at cost, less accumulated amortization, and are recorded as a reduction of the debt outstanding in current or long-term debt, unless there is no current portion for the period presented, in which case, the deferred financing cost will be recorded in prepaid expenses. Amortization expense is included in interest expense. Deferred financing costs amortized during years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $2.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Unamortized deferred financing costs were $10.4 million and $12.8 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

 

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Product Sales

Product sales revenue is recognized when title has transferred to the customer and the customer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, which is typically on delivery to the customer or, in the case of products that are subject to consignment agreements, when the customer removes product from the Company's consigned inventory location for shipment directly to a patient.

Revenue from sales transactions where the buyer has the right to return the product is recognized at the time of sale only if (i) the seller's price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale, (ii) the buyer has paid the seller, or the buyer is obligated to pay the seller and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product, (iii) the buyer's obligation to the seller would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product, (iv) the buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided by the seller, (v) the seller does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer, and (vi) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated.

Revenues from sales of products are recorded net of estimated allowances for returns, specialty distributor fees, wholesaler fees, prompt payment discounts, government rebates, government chargebacks, coupon programs and rebates under managed care plans. Provisions for returns, specialty distributor fees, wholesaler fees, government rebates, coupon programs and rebates under managed care plans are included within current liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Provision for prompt payment discounts are generally shown as a reduction in accounts receivable. Calculating certain of these items involves estimates and judgments based on sales or invoice data, contractual terms, historical utilization rates, new information regarding changes in these programs' regulations and guidelines that would impact the amount of the actual rebates, the Company's expectations regarding future utilization rates for these programs and channel inventory data.

 

Co-promotion, Royalties and Other Product Related Revenues

Co-promotion, Royalties and Other Product Related Revenues

The Company receives royalties from third parties based on sales of the Company's products under licensing and distribution arrangements. For those arrangements where royalties are reasonably estimable, the Company recognizes revenues based on estimates of royalties earned during the applicable period, and adjusts for differences between the estimated and actual royalties in the following quarter. Historically, these adjustments have not been significant.

The Company's contract revenues consist of fees and milestone payments. Non-refundable fees where the Company has no continuing performance obligations are recognized as revenues when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement and collection is reasonably assured. In situations where the Company has continuing performance obligations, non- refundable fees are deferred and are recognized ratably over the Company's projected performance period. Sales-based milestone payments are typically payments made to the Company that are triggered when aggregate net sales of a product by a collaborator for a specified period (for example, an annual period) reach an agreed upon threshold amount. The Company recognizes sales-based milestone payments from a collaborator when the event that triggers the obligation of payment has occurred, there is no further obligation on the Company's part in connection with the payment, and collection is reasonably assured.

 

 

Cost of Product Sales

Cost of Product Sales

Cost of product sales is comprised of (i) costs to manufacture or acquire products sold to customers; (ii) royalty, co-promotion and other revenue sharing payments under license and other agreements granting the Company rights to sell related products; (iii) direct and indirect distribution costs incurred in the sale of products; and (iv) the value of any write-offs or donations of obsolete or damaged inventory that cannot be sold. The Company acquired the rights to sell certain of its commercial products through license and assignment agreements with the original developers or other parties with interests in these products. These agreements obligate the Company to make payments under varying payment structures based on its net revenue from related products.

In connection with the acquisitions of Cypress and Somaxon, the Company adjusted the predecessor cost basis increasing inventory to fair value as required by ASC No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  As a result, the Company recorded adjustments to increase the inventory to fair value in the amount of $8.6 million and $695,000 at the time of acquisition for Cypress and Somaxon, respectively.  Cost of product sales for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 included $0 and $97,000, respectively of inventory costs associated with the increase in the basis of the inventory that was amortized as the inventory was subsequently sold. The remaining balance of the increase in the basis of the inventory acquired was $0 as of December 31, 2016.

 

 

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events and transactions since December 31, 2016. The Company did not have any non-recognized subsequent events, but had the following recognized subsequent event:

On January 31, 2017, the arbitration tribunal issued opinions in favor of GSK, awarding it damages and fees in the amount of approximately $35 million, plus interest (estimated to be approximately $2 to $5 million). The tribunal also denied the Company's claim that GSK breached its obligations under the supply agreement. Subsequent discussions with GSK resulted in an agreement on March 17, 2017, to amend the Interim Settlement Agreement. A payment schedule was established for satisfaction of the current balance of the award. Pursuant to the amendment, we have agreed that the current outstanding balance is approximately $21.5 million and we have agreed to make quarterly installments to GSK in amounts totaling $1.0 million in 2017, $3.5 million in 2018 and approximately $17.0 million in 2019. Pernix has also agreed that for so long as the Interim Settlement Agreement is in effect, Pernix will be subject to certain restrictions on non-ordinary course payments and transactions and GSK will have certain information rights.  GSK has agreed that for so long as Pernix complies with the payment schedule set forth in the Amendment, as well as other agreed-upon obligations, enforcement of the Award will be stayed and GSK shall not seek to enforce or exercise any other remedies in respect of the Award. The Company recorded the fair value of this settlement in the amount of approximately $18.5 million in its financial statements at December 31, 2016 and has recorded $15.3 million as a reduction to net revenues, $1.0 million to selling, general and administrative expense and $2.2 million to interest expense in the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

 

Research and Development Costs

Research and Development

Research and development costs in connection with the Company's internal programs for the development of products are expensed as incurred. Pernix either expenses research and development costs as incurred or will advance third parties a research and development fee, which is amortized over the term of the related agreement.

 

 

Advertising Expenses

Advertising Expenses

The Company expenses the costs of advertising, including promotional expenses, as incurred in SG&A.  Advertising expenses for 2016 and 2015 were $12.6 million and $18.3 million, respectively.  The decrease is due to advertising programs for Silenor and Treximet that were decreased during 2016.

 

 

Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted share units (RSUs), at estimated fair value. The Company amortizes the fair value of stock option or RSU grants on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the individual stock option or RSU grant, which generally equals the vesting period. Stock option and RSU forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. 

 

 

 

Segment Information

Segment Information

The Company currently markets two major product lines: a branded pharmaceuticals product line and a generic pharmaceuticals product line. These product lines qualify for reporting as a single segment in accordance with GAAP because they are similar in the nature of the products and services, production processes, types of customer, distribution methods and regulatory environment.

 

 

Acquisition-Related Contingent Consideration

Acquisition-Related Contingent Consideration

Acquisition-related contingent consideration, which consists primarily of potential milestone payments and royalty obligations, is recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at its acquisition date estimated fair value, in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. The fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period, with changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in fair value measurement accounting.

 

 

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Temporary differences are differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences on income taxes when the reported amount of the asset or liability is recovered or settled. Deferred taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in periods in which the deductible or taxable temporary difference is expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in income from continuing operations in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company will recognize deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences, operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

The Company must also make judgments regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets. The carrying value of the Company's net deferred tax assets is based on its view of whether it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income in certain jurisdictions to realize these deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance has been established for deferred tax assets which the Company does not believe meet the "more likely than not" criteria. The Company's judgments regarding future taxable income may change due to changes in market conditions, changes in tax laws, tax planning strategies or other factors. If the Company's assumptions and consequently its estimates change in the future, the valuation allowances it has established may be increased or decreased, resulting in a respective increase or decrease in income tax expense. The Company's effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic distribution of its worldwide earnings or losses, the tax regulations and tax holidays in each geographic region, the availability of tax credits and carryforwards, and the effectiveness of its tax planning strategies.

The Company used a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with the guidance on judgments regarding the realizability of deferred taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company's tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

Income tax returns subject to review by taxing authorities include 2013 through 2016.

 

Contingencies

Contingencies

Periodically, the Company may be involved in claims and other legal matters.  The Company records accruals for loss contingencies to the extent that management concludes that it is probable that a liability has been occurred and the amount of the related loss can be reasonably estimated.  Legal fees and other expenses related to litigation are expensed as incurred and included in SG&A.  See Note 19, Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information.

 

 

Earnings per Share

Earnings per Share

Earnings per common share is presented under two formats: basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the potentially dilutive impact of common stock equivalents (i.e. restricted stock, stock options, warrants and convertible notes). Dilutive common share equivalents consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants, conversion of notes or vesting of restricted stock. 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):

      Year ended December 31,
      2016     2015
Numerator:            
     Net loss   $ (169,590)   $ (148,315)
             
Denominator:            
Weighted-average common shares, basic     7,827      5,333 
     Dilutive effective of stock options     -       -  
Weighted-average common shares, diluted     7,827      5,333 
             
Net loss per share, basic and diluted   $ (21.67)   $ (27.81)

 

The following table sets forth the potential common shares that could potentially dilute basic income per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented (in thousands):

      Year ended December 31,
      2016     2015
4.25% Convertible Notes     1,133      789 
Stock options and restricted stock     774      395 
Warrants     33      47 
Total potential dilutive effect     1,940      1,231 

 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) (ASU 2016-15) which provides updated guidance on eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows: debt prepayments and extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon bonds, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2016-15 on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Accordingly, the standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The Company does expect adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. The ASU affects all companies and other organizations that lease assets such as real estate, airplanes, and manufacturing equipment. The ASU will require organizations that lease assets referred to as "Lessees" to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. An organization is to provide disclosures designed to enable users of financial statements to understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements concerning additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, the new ASU will require both types of leases (i.e. operating and capital) to be recognized on the balance sheet. The FASB lessee accounting model will continue to account for both types of leases. The capital lease will be accounted for in substantially the same manner as capital leases are accounted for under existing GAAP. The operating lease will be accounted for in a manner similar to operating leases under existing GAAP, except that lessees will recognize a lease liability and a lease asset for all of those leases.

The leasing standard will be effective for calendar year-end public companies beginning after December 15, 2018. Public companies will be required to adopt the new leasing standard for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption will be permitted for all companies and organizations upon issuance of the standard. For calendar year-end public companies, this means an adoption date of January 1, 2019 and retrospective application to previously issued annual and interim financial statements for 2018 and 2017. See Note 19, Commitments and Contingencies, for the Company's current lease commitments. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact that this new leasing ASU will have on its financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The accounting standard primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, it includes a clarification related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In July 2015, the FASB issued, ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance, be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Prior to the issuance of the standard, inventory was measured at the lower of cost or market (where market was defined as replacement cost, with a ceiling of net realizable value and floor of net realizable value less a normal profit margin). The accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this standard during the first quarter of 2017. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

On August 27, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires an entity to evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The guidance became effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods with years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this standard during the fourth quarter of 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date" (ASU 2015- 14), which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Accordingly, the standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. The Company anticipates adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method. There may be differences in timing of revenue recognition under the new standard compared to recognition under ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.

There were no other recent accounting pronouncements that have not yet been adopted by the Company that are expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.