XML 165 R56.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Property, Plant and Equipment (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Property, plant and equipment [abstract]  
Disclosure of Property, Plant and Equipment
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018*

 
 
 
Mining assets
20 549

24 203

Mining assets under construction
2 964

2 528

Undeveloped properties
3 965

3 974

Other non-mining assets
271

264

 
 
 
Total property, plant and equipment
27 749

30 969


* Re-presented due to the change in the final purchase price allocation related to the Moab Khotsong acquisition. Refer to note 12 for detail.
The movement in the mining assets is as follows:
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018*

 
 
 
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
49 741

40 570

Fully depreciated assets no longer in use derecognised
(302
)

Additions1
4 113

2 546

Acquisition of Moab Khotsong

3 554

Disposals
(16
)
(68
)
Scrapping of assets
(117
)
(2
)
Adjustment to rehabilitation asset
(439
)
(175
)
Transfers and other movements
801

3 117

Translation
(152
)
199

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
53 629

49 741

 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation and impairments
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
25 538

19 263

Fully depreciated assets no longer in use derecognised
(302
)

Impairment of assets
3 880

3 460

Disposals
(16
)
(67
)
Scrapping of assets
(96
)
(1
)
Depreciation
4 184

2 789

Translation
(108
)
94

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
33 080

25 538

Net carrying value
20 549

24 203

* Relates to a change in the fair value of assets acquired - refer to note 12 for detail.
1 Included in additions for 2019 is an amount of R173 million (2018: R12 million) for capitalised depreciation associated with stripping activities at the Hidden Valley operations.
The movement in the mining assets under construction is as follows:
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018

 
 
 
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
2 528

3 104

Additions1
1 070

1 988

Depreciation capitalised2
50

312

Finance costs capitalised3
133

183

Transfers and other movements
(802
)
(3 123
)
Translation
(15
)
64

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
2 964

2 528

1 For 2019 pre-production revenue of Rnil (2018: R1 288 million) was credited against additions.
2 Relates primarily to Hidden Valley.
3 Refer to note 9 for further detail on the capitalisation rate applied
The movement in the undeveloped properties is as follows:
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018

 
 
 
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
5 446

5 442

Translation
(9
)
4

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
5 437

5 446

 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation and impairments
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning and end of year
1 472

14

Impairment1

1 458

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
1 472

1 472

Net carrying value
3 965

3 974

1 The impairment for 2018 year relates to Target North.
The movement in the non-mining assets is as follows:
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018

 
 
 
Cost
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
609

441

Fully depreciated assets no longer in use derecognised
(9
)

Additions
59

37

Acquisition of Moab Khotsong

137

Transfers and other movements
1

(6
)
Translation
(2
)

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
658

609

13
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT continued

OTHER NON-MINING ASSETS continued
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018

 
 
 
Accumulated depreciation and impairments
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of year
345

236

Fully depreciated assets no longer in use derecognised
(9
)

Depreciation
39

56

Impairment
12

51

Translation

2

 
 
 
Balance at end of year
387

345

Net carrying value
271

264

Disclosure of Gold Price, Silver Price, Exchange Rates and Gold Resource Value Assumptions
During the year under review, the group calculated the recoverable amounts (generally fair value less costs to sell) based on updated life-of-mine plans and the following gold price, silver price and exchange rates assumptions:
 
2019

2018

2017

 
 
 
 
US$ gold price per ounce
 
 
 
– Year 1
1 325

1 250

1 200

– Year 2
1 310

1 250

1 200

– Long term (year 3 onwards)
1 290

1 250

1 200

US$ silver price per ounce
 
 
 
– Year 1 and year 2
15.75

17.00

17.00

– Long term (year 3 onwards)
17.00

17.00

17.00

Exchange rate (R/US$)
 
 
 
– Year 1
14.43

13.30

13.61

– Year 2
14.25

13.30

13.61

– Long term (year 3 onwards)
14.11

13.30

13.61

Exchange rate (PGK/US$)
3.34

3.17

3.16

Rand gold price (R/kg)
 
 
 
– Year 1
615 000

535 000

525 000

– Year 2
600 000

535 000

525 000

– Long term (year 3 onwards)
585 000

535 000

525 000

 
 
 
 

The following is the attributable gold resource value assumption:
 
South Africa
Hidden Valley
US dollar per ounce
2019

2018

2017

2019

2018

2017

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Measured
25.00

25.00

32.69

n/a

n/a

n/a

Indicated
8.00

8.00

18.68

8.00

5.84

5.84

Inferred
2.80

2.80

4.67

n/a

5.84

5.84

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Disclosure of Sensitivity Analysis - Impairment of Assets
The impairment of assets consists of the following:
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018

2017

 
 
 
 
Tshepong Operations
2 254

988

255

Kusasalethu
690

579

678

Target 1
312

699

785

Target 3
318



Joel
198

160


Other mining assets
120

319


Bambanani
6



Doornkop

317


Unisel

487


Masimong

329


Target North

1 458


 
 
 
 
Total impairment of assets
3 898

5 336

1 718


The recoverable amounts for these assets have been determined on a fair value less costs to sell basis using the assumptions per note 13 in discounted cash flow models and attributable resource values. These are fair value measurements classified as level 3. The recoverable amounts of the CGUs where impairments were recognised as at 30 June 2019 are as follows:
 
SA rand
 
Recoverable amount
Figures in million
Life-of-Mine plan

Resource base

Total

 
 
 
 
Tshepong Operations
 
 
 
The impairment is due to the increased costs to exploit the resource base as well as a lower expected recovered grade. The decrease in the recovery grade is as a result of the change in the dilution factors applied to the outside life of mine resources.
3 811

2 055

5 866

Kusasalethu
 
 
 
The decrease in grade and increased estimated costs in the resource base resulted in a lower recoverable amount. The decrease in the recovery grade is as a result of the change in the dilution factors applied to the outside life of mine resources.
1 297


1 297

Target 1
 
 
 
The recoverable amount decreased as a result of increased costs and decrease in grade in the resource base together with the estimated impact of carbon tax. The increase in discount rate due to increased risk factors also negatively impacted on the recoverable amount.
467

609

1 076

Target 3
 
 
 
The operation remains under care and maintenance. A change in valuation method from discounted cash flow model to resource multiple approach reduced the recoverable amount.
None

182

182

Joel
 
 
 
The increased capital costs in the resource base together with carbon tax negatively impacted the net present value of expected cash flows.
765

87

852

Other mining assets
 
 
 
The updated life-of-mine plans for the CGUs in Freegold and Avgold resulted in the impairment of other mining assets.
335

None

335

Bambanani
 
 
 
The impairment of goodwill reduced the carrying amount of intangible assets. As goodwill is not depreciated, it results in an impairment as the life of the operation shortens.
763

None

763

 
 
 
 
6
COST OF SALES continued

(f)
Impairment continued

The recoverable amounts of the CGUs where impairments were recognised as at 30 June 2018 are as follows:
 
SA rand
 
Recoverable amount
Figures in million
Life-of-Mine plan

Resource base

Total

 
 
 
 
Tshepong Operations
 
 
 
The impairment was mainly driven by sensitivity to fluctuations in the gold price. Furthermore the updated life-of-mine for the Tshepong operations presented a marginal decrease in recovered grade.
4 279

3 147

7 426

Kusasalethu
 
 
 
Kusasalethu's old section of the mine at the operation was excluded in the FY19 life-of-mine plan.
1 019

1 119

2 138

Target 1
 
 
 
Exploration drilling results during the year pointed towards lower grade estimates within certain blocks that have now been excluded from the life-of-mine plans.
471

746

1 217

Joel
 
 
 
The updated life-of-mine for the Joel operation presented a marginal decrease in recovered grade.
540

336

876

Other mining assets
 
 
 
The updated life-of-mine plans for the CGUs in Freegold and Harmony resulted in the impairment of other mining assets.
366

None

366

Doornkop
 
 
 
The impairment of Doornkop is primarily as a result of a decrease in the Kimberley Reef's resource values.
1 552

1 178

2 730

Unisel
 
 
 
Excluded the Leader Reef from the life-of-mine plan to focus on the higher grade Basal Reef. This reduced the life-of-mine from four years to eighteen months.
38

None

38

Masimong
 
 
 
The impairment at Masimong was as a result of the depletion of the higher grade B Reef and subsequent reduced life-of-mine.
58

None

58

Target North
 
 
 
The impairment of Target North was as a result of a decrease in resource values.
None

3 681

3 681

 
 
 
 

The recoverable amounts of the CGUs where impairments were recognised as at 30 June 2017 are as follows:
 
SA rand
 
Recoverable amount
Figures in million
Life-of-Mine plan

Resource base

Total

 
 
 
 
Tshepong Operations
 
 
 
The impairment was mainly driven by the restriction on hoisting capacity at Phakisa along with the general pressure on margins.
4 931

2 849

7 780

Target 1
 
 
 
Information gained from the underground drilling during the year indicated that some areas of the bottom reef of the Dreyerskuil are highly channelised, which negatively impacted on the overall grade for the operation. These areas were subsequently excluded from the life-of-mine plan. This, together with the general pressure on margins, reduced the profitability of the operation over its life and contributed to the decrease in the recoverable amount.
867

1 129

1 996

Kusasalethu
 
 
 
The impairment was driven by a reduction in the additional attributable resource value as a result of a decrease in the ounces. The company investigated the viability of a decline to extend the life. The business case showed that the option was not feasible and therefore the resource ounces were reduced.
1 240

1 543

2 783

 
 
 
 

The sensitivity scenario of a 10% decrease or increase in the commodity price used in the discounted cash flow models and the resource values used (with all other variables held constant) would have resulted in the following impairment being recorded as at 30 June 2019 and 2018:
 
SA rand
Figures in million
2019

2018

 
 
 
- 10% decrease
 
 
Tshepong Operations
7 155

5 174

Moab Khotsong1
2 758

1 636

Kusasalethu
1 962

2 716

Doornkop
1 350

2 052

Target 1
1 278

1 684

Joel
984

882

Hidden Valley
749

752

Target 3
337

141

Bambanani1
331

222

Target North
291

1 826

Other surface operations
178

540

Masimong
105

386

Unisel
45

525

Kalgold
39


 
 
 
+ 10% increase
 
 
Target 3
300


Masimong

59

Target North

1 090

Unisel

433

 
 
 
1 The carrying amounts of these CGUs include goodwill and any impairment losses are allocated first to goodwill and then to the identifiable assets.