XML 28 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
12.
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
 
Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability assuming an orderly transaction in the most advantageous market at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used in measuring fair value.
 
The inputs used in measuring the fair value of cash and cash equivalents are considered to be level 1 in accordance with the three-tier fair value hierarchy. The fair market values are based on period-end statements supplied by the various banks and brokers that held the majority of our funds. The fair value of short-term financial instruments (primarily accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, borrowings under line of credit, and other current liabilities) approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature. While our Notes are recorded on our accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated balance sheets at their net carrying value of $117.0 million as of June 30, 2016, the Notes are being traded on the bond market and their full fair value is $155.4 million, based on their closing price on June 30, 2016, a Level 1 input. 
 
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis  
 
Our contingent value rights (“CVRs”), which were granted coincident with our merger with BioSante and expire in June 2023, are considered contingent consideration and are classified as liabilities. As such, the CVRs were recorded as purchase consideration at their estimated fair value, using level 3 inputs, and are marked to market each reporting period until settlement. The fair value of CVRs is estimated using the present value of our projection of the expected payments pursuant to the terms of the CVR agreement, which is the primary unobservable input. If our projection or expected payments were to increase substantially, the value of the CVRs could increase as a result. The present value of the liability was calculated using a discount rate of 15%. We determined that the fair value of the CVRs, and the changes in such fair value, was immaterial as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
 
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, by level within the fair value hierarchy:
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Fair Value at
June 30, 2016
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CVRs
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
Description
 
Fair Value at
December 31, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CVRs
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis  
 
We do not have any financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
 
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
We do not have any non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
 
We measure our long-lived assets, including property, plant, and equipment, intangible assets, and goodwill, at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. No such fair value impairment was recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
 
Acquired Non-Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value
 
In April 2016, we purchased the rights, title, and interest in the NDA for Inderal LA, as well as certain documentation, trademark rights, and finished goods from Cranford Pharmaceuticals, LLC for $60.0 million in cash and milestone payments based on future gross profits from sales of products under the NDA (Note 7). In addition, at closing, we transferred $5.0 million to an escrow account as security for future milestone payments. This escrow account balance is not expected to be released in less than one year and is included in restricted cash in our accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016. We made the $60.0 million upfront cash payment using cash on hand, capitalized $0.3 million of costs directly related to the transaction, and recognized $3.9 million of minimum milestone payments for a total purchase price of $64.2 million. We accounted for this transaction as an asset purchase. In order to determine the fair value of the NDA, we used the present value of the estimated cash flows related to the product rights, using a discount rate of 12%. The $52.4 million NDA will be amortized in full over its 10 year useful life, and will be tested for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. No such triggering events were identified during the period from the date of acquisition to June 30, 2016 and therefore no impairment loss was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. We recorded $10.9 million of finished goods. The fair value of the finished goods was determined based on the estimated sales to be generated from the finished goods, less costs to sell, including a reasonable margin. We recorded the $3.9 million of minimum milestone payments as accrued royalties. We recorded $0.6 million for the non-compete agreement associated with the transaction. In order to determine the fair value of the non-compete agreement, we used the probability-weighted lost cash flows method, using a discount rate of 10%. The non-compete agreement will be amortized in full over its seven year useful life. We also recorded a $0.3 million prepaid balance related to a partially paid purchase order for inventory.
 
In January 2016, we purchased from Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. the NDAs for two previously marketed generic drug products for $75.0 million in cash and a percentage of future net sales from product sales (Note 7). In addition, we capitalized $0.3 million in legal costs directly related to the transaction. We accounted for this transaction as an asset purchase. In order to determine the fair value of the NDAs, we used the present value of the estimated cash flows related to the product rights, using a discount rate of 10%. The NDAs will be amortized in full over their 10 year useful lives, and will be tested for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. No such triggering events were identified during the period from the date of acquisition to June 30, 2016 and therefore no impairment loss was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
 
In January 2016, we purchased from H2-Pharma, LLC the rights to market, sell, and distribute the authorized generic of Lipofen® and a generic hydrocortisone rectal cream product, along with the rights to an early-stage development project, for total consideration of $10.0 million (Note 7). The consideration consisted of a cash payment of $8.8 million and the assumption of $1.2 million in existing royalties owed on the acquired rights. In addition, we capitalized $42 thousand of costs directly related to the transaction. We accounted for this transaction as an asset purchase. In order to determine the fair value of the rights for purposes of purchase price allocation, we used the present value of the estimate cash flows related to the product rights, using a discount rate of 10%. No value was ascribed to the early-stage development project because the development is still at the preliminary stage, with no expenses incurred or research performed to date. The marketing and distribution rights will be amortized in full over their average estimated useful lives of approximately four years, and will be tested for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. No such triggering events were identified from the date of acquisition to June 30, 2016 and therefore no impairment loss was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.