The Company's license agreement with Antares Pharma, Inc. requires the Company to fund the development of the licensed products, make milestone payments and pay royalties on the sales of products related to this license. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid or accrued $335,160, $152,228 and $63,749, respectively, to Antares as a result of royalties generated by Elestrin revenues. Pursuant to a separate agreement with Antares and related to the December 2009 license amendment with Azur Pharma International II Limited (now known as Jazz Pharmaceuticals, in light of Jazz Pharmaceuticals' acquisition of Azur), the Company paid Antares an aggregate of $268,750 in February 2010, which is recorded in licensing expense.

In April 2002, the Company exclusively in-licensed from Wake Forest University Health Sciences and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center three issued U.S. patents claiming triple component therapy (the combination use of estrogen plus progestogen plus androgen, e.g. testosterone) and obtained an option to license the patents for triple component contraception. The financial terms of the license include an upfront payment by the Company in exchange for exclusive rights to the license and regulatory milestone payments, maintenance payments and royalty payments by the Company if a product incorporating the licensed technology gets approved and subsequently marketed. In July 2005, the Company exercised the option for an exclusive license for the three U.S. patents for triple component contraception. The financial terms of this license include an upfront payment, regulatory milestone payments, maintenance payments and royalty payments by the Company if a product incorporating the licensed technology gets approved and subsequently marketed.

Year	Minimum Amount Due

2012	$	80,000
2013		80,000
2014		80,000
2015		80,000
2016		40,000
Thereafter		80,000

Under the terms of the license agreement with the Wake Forest University Health Sciences and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, the Company has the right to terminate the license at any time.

The Company has agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Wake Forest University Health Sciences and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center against any and all claims, suits, losses, damages, costs, fees and expenses resulting from or arising out of exercise of the license agreement, including but not limited to, any product liability claims. The Company has not recorded any liability in connection with this obligation as no events occurred that would require indemnification.

The Company currently has a commitment with Aptar Pharma to purchase a gel filling machine for $842,740. As of December 31, 2011, the Company has paid $337,096 resulting in a remaining obligation of $505,644.

On February 3, 2012, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under the caption Thomas Lauria, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Stephen M. Simes naming the Company and the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, Stephen M. Simes, as defendants. The complaint alleges that certain of the Company's disclosures relating to the efficacy of LibiGel and its commercial potential were false and/or misleading and that such false and/or misleading statements had the effect of artificially inflating the price of the Company's securities resulting in violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), Rule 10b-5 and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. A substantially similar complaint was filed in the same court on February 21, 2012. The plaintiffs seek to represent a class of persons who purchased the Company's securities between February 8, 2010 and December 15, 2011, and seek unspecified compensatory damages, equitable and/or injunctive relief, and reasonable costs, expert fees and attorneys' fees on behalf of such purchasers. BioSante believes the actions are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously. Additional lawsuits may be filed and, at this time, because the litigation is in its early stages, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with their resolution or any potential effect they may have on BioSante's operations. Failure by the Company to obtain a favorable resolution of the lawsuits, however, could have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or its operations.