XML 38 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Liability Attributable to Warrants (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Liability Attributable to Warrants [Abstract]  
Assumption used to determine the fair value of warrants
We used a binomial pricing model to determine the fair value of our warrants liability as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance sheet dates, using the following assumptions:
 
 
 
2011 Transaction
  
ipCapital
 
 
 
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
  
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
Estimated volatility
  
120
%
  
159
%
  
125
%
  
163
%
Annualized forfeiture rate
  
   
   
   
 
Expected option term (years)
  
2.92
   
3.67
   
3.04
   
3.79
 
Estimated exercise factor
  
4
   
10
   
4
   
10
 
Risk-free interest rate
  
0.50
%
  
0.45
%
  
0.64
%
  
0.65
%
Dividends
  
   
   
   
Reconciliation of the warrants liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs
The following table is a reconciliation of the warrants liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
 
Warrants liability – December 31, 2012 fair value
 
$
7,390,100
 
Change in fair value of warrant liability recorded in other income
  
(680,100
)
Change in fair value of warrant liability recorded in general and administrative expense
  
35,700
 
Reclassification of warrants liability to equity from exercise of warrants (1)
  
(385,900
)
Reclassification of warrants liability to equity from amendment to warrants  (1)
  
(4,391,000
)
Warrants liability – September 30, 2013 fair value
 
$
1,968,800
 
 
(1)
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013, our warrants liability was reduced as a result of the warrants amendment, as discussed above. Additionally, our warrants liability was further reduced by $385,900 as a result of the exercise of 1,072,500 warrants during such period, whose terms were not affected by the changes made under the warrants amendment. The aggregate reduction in the liability, combining the warrant amendment and this exercise, was $4,776,900. See Note 13.
Warrants outstanding
The following tables reconcile the number of warrants outstanding for the periods indicated:
 
For the Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2013
 
 
 
Beginning Outstanding
  
 
Issued
  
Exercised
  
Ending Outstanding
 
2011 Transaction
  
13,157,500
   
   
305,000
   
12,852,500
 
Exercise Agreement
  
4,500,000
   
   
   
4,500,000
 
ipCapital
  
400,000
   
   
   
400,000
 
Consultant Warrant (1)
  
   
312,500
   
   
312,500
 
Offer to Exercise
  
   
152,500
   
   
152,500
 
Total
  
18,057,500
   
465,000
   
305,000
   
18,217,500
 

For the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2013
 
 
 
Beginning Outstanding
  
 
Issued
  
Exercised
  
Ending Outstanding
 
2011 Transaction
  
23,075,000
   
   
10,222,500
   
12,852,500
 
Exercise Agreement
  
   
4,500,000
   
   
4,500,000
 
ipCapital
  
400,000
   
   
   
400,000
 
Consulting Warrant (1)
  
   
312,500
   
   
312,500
 
Offer to Exercise
  
   
152,500
   
   
152,500
 
Total
  
23,475,000
   
4,965,000
   
10,222,500
   
18,217,500
 

For the Three and Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2012
 
 
 
Beginning Outstanding
  
 
Issued
  
Exercised
  
Ending Outstanding
 
2011 Transaction
  
23,075,000
   
   
   
23,075,000
 
ipCapital
  
400,000
   
   
   
400,000
 
Total
  
23,475,000
   
   
   
23,475,000
 
 
(1) Effective September 18, 2013, we entered into a consulting agreement with Genesis Select to provide us with a variety of investor relations services. As part of their compensation, we issued to them a warrant to purchase 312,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The warrant will vest, monthly, over the initial twelve-month service period of the contract, assuming that the agreement remains in-force, with the first vesting having occured on October 18, 2013. The warrant is substantially similar in nature to those issued in the warrant amendment, discussed above, thus; the warrant is accounted in equity and is not included as a component of our warrants liability as of September 30, 2013. We used the following assumptions in a binomial pricing model to calculate the fair value of the warrant issued to Genesis: estimated volatility – 181%; expected term – 4.96 years; estimated exercise factor – 4, risk free interest rate – 1.41%; and dividends – 0. Expense associated with this warrant is recognized as a component of general and administrative expense over the one-year vesting term of the warrant.