2.4.0.80022 - Disclosure - 16. Commitments and Contingenciestruefalsefalse1false falsefalseFrom2011-07-01to2012-06-30http://www.sec.gov/CIK0001020477duration2011-07-01T00:00:002012-06-30T00:00:001true 1ROBK_NotesToFinancialStatementsAbstractROBK_falsenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00falsefalsefalsexbrli:stringItemTypestringfalse0Notes to Financial Statements2false 2us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlockus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00The Company has guaranteed certain notes payable of RBL in the amount to $250,000. (Note 9)   On March 15, 2011, and April 16, 2012, the Company entered into non-exclusive agreements with an investment banker, financial advisor and consultant.  The agreements each become exclusive for 14 days following execution and then non-exclusive for a term of six months.  The Company a agreed to pay to the investment banker a cash placement fee of 8% of the total purchase price of the Companys securities sold, adjusted by the exercise of any investor warrants, in connection with a placement resulting from the investment bankers introduction.  In addition, the banker shall receive warrants to purchase common shares of the Company equal to 8% of the funds raised, as defined.  If the investment banker introduces the Company during the term to a transaction which becomes a merger, acquisition, joint venture or similar transaction, the Company shall pay the banker a fee in combination of stock and cash that reflects the exact percentage of stock and or cash used for the transaction, as defined.    Financing Agreement   On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to engage Citadel Securities, LLC (Citadel) as its non-exclusive financial advisor to provide certain financial advisory services in connection with the financing of its Gulfport, Mississippi casino development project.  The Company will pay fees to Citadel, as follows:   ●           4.00% of the gross proceeds of any equity financing received by the Company or its affiliates in connection with the development project introduced to the Company by Citadel;   ●           3.00% of the gross proceeds of any debt financing received by the Company or its affiliates in connection with the development project introduced to the Company by Citadel;   ●           2.00% of the gross proceeds of any equity or debt financing received by the Company or its affiliates in connection with the development project introduced to Citadel by the Company as not defined by the agreement;   ●           1.00% of the gross proceeds of any equity financing received by the Company or its affiliates in connection with the development project introduced to Citadel by the Company as defined by the agreement.   On August 31, 2011, the Company agreed to an assignment of this engagement to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.   Litigation   On October 25, 2010, a Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan by The Sandesh Limited, a company incorporated in the Republic of India, against the Company, RBL and a former employee. The Plaintiff alleges that as a condition to their purchase of 1,200,000 shares of the common stock of the Company, the Plaintiff had the right to require the Defendants to repurchase all or any portion of the shares. Plaintiffs also allege that a subsequent agreement was entered into with RBL, whereby RBL would purchase the Plaintiffs 1,200,000 shares of common stock.  Plaintiff further alleges that this repurchase also did not occur and that the Defendants breached other terms of the agreements. Plaintiffs are seeking the return of $1,200,000 and additional unspecified amounts as compensatory, actual and punitive and/or exemplary damages, restitution for unjust enrichment, prejudgment interest, attorneys fees and costs and other relief as the court deems appropriate.   On November 23, 2011, a settlement agreement was entered into dismissing the litigation and ordering that RBL pay Sandesh $1,500,000 as settlement, in payments of $35,000, per month, as defined, with interest at 8%, per annum. Sandesh is holding 480,000 common shares of the Companys stock owned by RBL as collateral and is entitled to receive 350 units of RBMS from RBI.   On February 23, 2010, a Complaint was filed in the Third Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada in and For the County of Lyon against the Company, RBL, and others in the amount of $5,000,000 pursuant to the termination of a development agreement for the Dayton Project.  On July 16, 2010, the Company and Defendants filed an answer and counterclaim. A default Judgment was filed in the Third Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada In and For the County of Lyon on August 8, 2011 against the Company, Rotate Black, LLC, two officers of the Company, and others in the amount of $9,674,057 for exemplary and punitive damages.    In connection with this matter, a Request for Enrollment of Foreign Judgment was filed in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, First Judicial District on December 23, 2011.  On June 6, 2012, the Company filed a Motion for Leave to Seek District Courts Correction of Clerical Error Appearing on the Face of the Judgment, Subject Matter of Current Appeal in the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada.  On June 7, 2012 the company was notified that its appeals to the default judgment will be heard by the Nevada Supreme Court. The Company will vigorously defend this action but can provide no assurance as to the likelihood of the outcome of the matter.falsefalsefalsenonnum:textBlockItemTypenaThe entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 false016. Commitments and Contingenciesfalse16. Commitments and ContingenciesUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownUnKnowntruefalsefalseSheethttp://rotateblack.com/role/CommitmentsAndContingencies12