UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to

Commission file number: 000-21377

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	38-3306461
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
40984 Concept Drive, Plymouth, MI	48170
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (734) 455-5400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each class

Common Stock, $.01 par value
Rights Associated with Common Stock, par value $.01 per Share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant based upon the closing price of the common stock on March 31, 2006 as reported by the NASDAQ National market was approximately $823,953,328.00. For the purposes hereof, “affiliates” include all executive officers and directors of the registrant.

15,419,500 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding as of December 6, 2006.

Certain sections of the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in March 2007 are incorporated by reference herein at Part III, Items 10-14.

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
PART I
	ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	1
	ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	17
	ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	21
	ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	22
	ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	23
	ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	23
PART II
	ITEM 5.	MARKET PRICE FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	23
	ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	24
	ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	25
	ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	32
	ITEM 8.	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	32
	ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	33
	ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	33
	ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	34
PART III
	ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	34
	ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	34
	ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	34
	ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	35
	ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	35
PART IV
	ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	36

i

PART I

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can be identified by the use of words such as “may”, “believe”, “will”, “expect”, “project”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “plan” or “continue”. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future results of operations and financial condition.

These factors include (among others):

• downturns in the machine tool, automotive, semiconductor and electronics industries which may have, in the future, a material adverse effect on sales and profitability of the Company;

• the ability of the Company’s OEM-customers to incorporate its laser products into their systems;

• the impact of exchange rate fluctuations, which may be significant because a substantial portion of the Company’s operations is located overseas;

• the level of competition and the ability of the Company to compete in the markets for its products;

• the Company’s ability to develop new and enhanced products to meet market demand or to adequately utilize its existing technology;

• third party infringement of the Company’s proprietary technology or third party claims against the Company for the infringement or misappropriation of their proprietary rights;

• competing technologies that are similar to or that serve the same uses as the Company’s technology;

• the scope of patent protection that the Company is able to obtain or maintain;

• the Company’s ability to efficiently manage the risks associated with its international operations; and

• the other risks described under “ITEM 1A - Risk Factors”.

In making these forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe-harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. We do not assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

COMPANY OVERVIEW AND HISTORY

Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc., a newly listed NASDAQ Company in 1996 (herein also referred to as “Rofin” or “RSTI” or the “Company” or “we”, “us” or “our”) is a leader in the design, development, engineering, manufacturing and marketing of laser-based products, primarily used for cutting, welding and marking a wide range of materials. Lasers are a non-contact technology for material processing, which have several advantages compared to conventional manufacturing tools that are desirable in industrial applications. The Company’s lasers all deliver a high-quality beam at guaranteed power outputs and feature compact design, high processing speed, flexibility, low operating and maintenance costs and easy integration into the customer’s production process. As a technological leader in CO₂, solid-state lasers and diode lasers, the Company is able to meet a broad range of its customers’ material processing requirements.

1

Based on projected 2006 industry data for laser products used for macro (cutting and welding) applications and marking and micro (fine cutting, fine welding, and perforating) applications combined, the Company believes it has a worldwide market share (based on sales volume) of approximately 20% and that it is among the largest suppliers of laser products used for marking applications worldwide. The Company has sold more than 40,000 laser sources since 1975 and currently has over 3,000 active customers (including multinational companies with multiple facilities purchasing from the Company). During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, approximately 49%, 50%, and 49%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues related to sales of laser products for macro applications and approximately 51%, 50%, and 51%, respectively, related to sales of laser products for marking and micro applications.

Through its global manufacturing, distribution and service network, the Company provides a comprehensive range of laser sources and laser-based system solutions to three principal target markets: the machine tool, automotive, and semiconductor and electronics industries. The Company sells directly to end-users and to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) (principally in the machine tool industry) that integrate Rofin’s laser sources with other system components. Many of Rofin’s customers are among the largest global participants in their respective industries. During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, 30%, 29%, and 22%, respectively, of the Company’s sales were in North America, 48%, 54%, and 59%, respectively, were in Europe and 22%, 17%, and 19%, respectively, were in Asia. See Note 13, “Geographic Information”, to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K present the historical financial information of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. These financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Rofin-Sinar, Inc. (“RS Inc.”), PRC Laser Corp. (“PRC”), Lee Laser, Inc. (“Lee”) and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L. (“RSTE”). RS Inc. owns 100% of Rofin-Baasel Canada Ltd. (“RCA”) (formed in May 2006) and 100% of DILAS Diodelaser Inc. (formed in October 2005). RSTE, a European holding company formed in 1999, owns 100% of Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH (“RSL”), 95% of Dilas Diodenlaser GmbH (“Dilas”), 100% of Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l., 100% of Rofin-Baasel France S.A., 80% of Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel UK Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Benelux B.V., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Singapore Pte. Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Taiwan Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Korea Co., Ltd., and 100% of Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L. (“RBE”).

The financial statements of PRC include the consolidated accounts of PRC Laser Europe N.V., Belgium.

The financial statements of RSL include the consolidated accounts of its 88%-owned subsidiary, Rofin-Baasel Japan Corporation, its 100%-owned subsidiary, Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH (“Rasant”), its 100%-owned subsidiary, Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG (“CBL”), its 90%-owned subsidiary Optoskand AB (“Optoskand”), its 100%-owned subsidiary, CBL Verwaltungsgesellschaft GmbH and its 80%-owned subsidiary Rofin-Baasel China Co., Ltd. .

The financial statements of CBL include the consolidated accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Rofin-Baasel, Inc., Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Geraete GmbH, and PMB Elektronik GmbH, as well as its 40% equity investment in H2B Photonics GmbH.

On February 28, 2004, the Company acquired 90% of the share capital of Optoskand AB, Gothenburg, Sweden, through its wholly-owned subsidiary RSL. The Company has a call option exercisable beginning in 2009 for the remaining 10% of the common stock for a fixed price of Euro 0.1 million. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements present Optoskand as if it was 100% owned.

On March 29, 2004, the Company issued and sold 2.5 million shares of its common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $28.00 per share. The underwriters exercised their over-allotment option resulting in an additional 360,000 shares of common stock being issued and sold on April 8, 2004. The Company realized net proceeds of $75.3 million as a result of these transactions.

On August 20, 2004, the Company acquired an additional 15% of the share capital of Dilas Diodenlaser GmbH, Mainz, Germany, through its wholly-owned subsidiary RSTE. The Company currently holds 95% of the share capital.

On August 31, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of PRC Laser Corporation based in Landing, New Jersey (including its wholly-owned European subsidiary PRC Laser Europe N.V., Oudenaarde, Belgium), and Lee Laser, Inc., based in Orlando, Florida.

2

On October 22, 2004, the remaining 17% of the share capital of Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L. was purchased by the Company through RSTE under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholder.

On December 9, 2004, the Company purchased an additional 5% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. through RSTE under an option agreement between the Company and the minority shareholders. The Company held 76% of the share capital as a result of this purchase.

On December 2, 2005, the Company purchased an additional 4% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. through Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L. under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholders. The Company currently holds 80% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. This purchase resulted in goodwill of $0.5 million.

On March 23, 2006, the Company acquired 40% of the share capital of H2B Photonics GmbH, Garbsen (Germany) through its wholly owned subsidiary Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG. H2B Photonics GmbH specializes in the development, manufacturing and sales of laser-based systems used to cut brittle materials, such as glass, to produce perfectly cut edges.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

The Company’s business strategy is to maximize shareholder value by (i) strengthening its position as a leading supplier to the global market for macro (cutting and welding) applications; (ii) capitalizing on its leadership position in marking applications; (iii) extending its position in micro (fine cutting, fine welding and perforating) applications; (iv) cross-selling its various laser products to its existing large customer base; (v) enlarging its market coverage geographically and by developing new applications, and (vi) strengthening its product portfolio and customer base through acquisitions.

The Company believes that the major sources of its future growth will be the following:

• Developing New Laser Products through Technological Innovation: Product innovation in response to evolving customer needs for increased output power, greater penetration and higher processing speeds is a key component of the Company’s strategy. The Company is currently focusing its research and development activity on increasing the output power of its CO₂, diffusion cooled, wave-guide Slab lasers and enhancing the performance of its line of high power, fast flow CO₂ lasers. The Company is also further expanding its series of end pumped, solid-state lasers for marking and micro applications and is actively engaged in the development of diode pumped, solid-state lasers using a process commonly referred to as “disc design”. This type of solid-state laser is capable of performing heavy industrial material processing applications, as well as fine cutting and fine welding applications, more precisely than previously possible.

• Focusing on Cross-Selling to Existing Customers in Target Markets: The Company intends to continue to focus its sales and marketing activities on the machine tool, automotive, semiconductor and electronics, and medical device industries. The Company has targeted and will continue to target these industries because they use advanced manufacturing processes that require continuing investments to improve production efficiency and because the Company has significant market presence in these sectors. To exploit its opportunities by developing new applications for existing laser technologies, the Company is exploring the potential for use of high-power CO₂ lasers in car body assembly by using its Remote Welding System concept in response to the interest shown by sub suppliers to car manufacturers in reducing their reliance on spot-welding guns. In addition, building on the success of its laser marking of small integrated circuits, the Company intends to develop new applications, such as fine welding and micro soldering for the semiconductor and electronics industry. In the packaging industry, the Company is seeking new opportunities for foil perforation based on its extensive knowledge of paper perforation with lasers.

3

• Capitalizing on Global Presence to Attract New Customers: The Company intends to capitalize on its customer base and the presence of its manufacturing, sales and service operations in the three principal geographic markets in which its customers operate (North America, Europe and the Asia/Pacific region) to increase market share in its existing industrial and geographic markets. The Company believes its global manufacturing, distribution and service network allows it to be more responsive to customers’ needs and positions it to expand into additional promising markets which offer high long-term potential for growth.

• Offering Customized Solutions Based on Standard Platforms: While the Company offers a wide range of laser applications and develops customized solutions for its customers, these applications and solutions are built on a focused number of product families comprised of standardized laser sources. For example, for its OEM customers in the machine tool industry, the Company provides customized power supply packaging services. For its marking customers, the Company combines its standard laser marker with customized parts handling and software. For its micro applications customers, the Company delivers its standard laser sources in different customized packages. The Company believes that this product strategy has contributed to increases in product sales and intends to continue offering focused customization services and pursuing its initiatives to standardize its core products so as to lower its production costs and continue to improve its profitability.

• Acquiring Complementary Business Operations or Products: Since 1997 the Company has successfully completed and integrated seven acquisitions, including its acquisitions of Dilas (1997), assets of Palomar Technologies UK Ltd. (1998), RasantAlcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH (1999), Baasel Lasertech (2000), Z-Laser S.A. (2001), Optoskand AB (2004), PRC Laser Corporation (2004), and Lee Laser, Inc. (2004). Management believes that, collectively, these acquisitions have advanced the Company’s worldwide expansion, consolidated the Company’s position in the industrial laser material processing market and contributed to the Company’s financial performance during the last several years. The Company will continue to seek opportunities to make value-based acquisitions that complement its business operations, broaden its product offerings or provide access to new geographical markets.

THE INDUSTRIAL LASER MARKET FOR MATERIAL PROCESSING

Over the past 30 years, lasers have revolutionized industrial manufacturing and have been used increasingly to provide reliable, flexible, non-contact, compact and high-speed alternatives to conventional technologies for processing various kinds of metal and non-metal materials in a broad range of advanced manufacturing applications. The industrial laser market is generally considered to be made up of laser sources sold for industrial applications including material processing, medical therapeutic, instrumentation, research, telecommunications, optical storage, entertainment, image recording, inspection, measurement and control, bar-code scanning and other end-uses.

LASER TECHNOLOGY

The term “laser” is an acronym for “Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation”. Lasers were first developed in the early 1960s in the United States. A laser consists of an active lasing medium that gives off its own light (radiation) when excited, an optical resonator with a partially-reflective output mirror at one end, a fully-reflective rear mirror at the other that permits the light to bounce back and forth between the mirrors through the lasing medium, and an external energy source used to excite the lasing medium. A laser works by causing the energy source to excite (pump) the lasing medium, which converts the energy from the source into an emission consisting of particles of light (photons). These photons stimulate the release of more photons, as they are reflected between the two mirrors, which form the resonator. The resulting build-up in the number of photons is emitted in the form of a laser beam through an output port or “window”. By changing the energy and the lasing medium, different wavelengths and types of laser light can be produced. The laser produces light from the lasing medium to achieve the desired intensity, uniformity and wavelength through a series of reflective mirrors. The heat generated by the excitation of the lasing medium is dissipated through a cooling mechanism, which varies according to the type of laser technology.

4

Lasers are used for material processing because of the excellent focusability of laser beams. When focused through lenses and mirrors, the energy density in the focus spot is so high that metals and other materials can be melted and vaporized. The principal factors that distinguish different types of lasers and determine the particular laser suitable for a specific application are pulse duration, wavelength, output power, spatial coherence and cost per watt of laser power. The three principal types of laser technologies currently used for material processing are CO₂ lasers, solid-state lasers and diode lasers. CO₂ lasers, which use CO₂ gas as the lasing medium, are divided into high-power (above 500 watts) and low-power (below 500 watts) applications. There are two methods for CO₂ excitation, radio frequency (“RF” or “HF”) and direct current (“DC”) excitation. Most high-power CO₂ lasers are based on gas flow, in which a continuous supply of fresh laser gas flows through the laser cavity to create the energy necessary for excitation. Due to their ability to generate comparatively high levels of continuous-wave (“CW”) power, CO₂ lasers are a particularly attractive laser medium for material processing applications. Material processing applications for CO₂ laser sources vary according to the power output and configuration of the laser system. The primary applications for high-power CO₂ lasers are cutting and welding of metal. Low-power CO₂ lasers are used principally for marking, cutting and engraving of non-metal materials. While both low- and high-power CO₂ lasers are used for cutting, the materials they are used to process and their physical size can vary significantly.

Solid-state lasers use flash lamps or laser diodes as source of excitation and are referred to as “flash-lamp pumped” or “diode-pumped”. The lasing medium is a solid-state crystal, generally in the form of a rod or a disc. The crystal material is either Neodymium Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) or Neodymium Vanadate (Nd:YVO₄). The crystal rod is positioned in a cavity, which is either a gold or ceramic reflector, and pumped using flash lamps or laser diodes from the side, or alternatively the rod is pumped from its ends with laser diodes. Typical output powers vary from 3 to 500 watts from a single rod and output powers up to 6,000 watts can be achieved by combining several cavities within a resonator. Solid-state lasers can be run either in a pulsed or continuous-wave manner. Marking applications generally require higher pulsing frequencies which are achieved by inserting a Q-switch, which is a fast electro-optical shutter, into the laser resonator, enabling frequencies to be switched up or down in multiples of 10 kHz at a time. Recent development efforts in the area of solid-state lasers have focused on a process commonly referred to as “disc design”. In the “disc design” the lasing medium is a thin crystal (typically Ytterbium:YAG) disc, which is excited by laser diodes in an optical multi-pass configuration.

Diode lasers involve the production of laser light in a special semiconductor structure on a Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) basis. A typical 10 mm long diode laser bar contains approximately 25 single laser emitters. When mounted on a specially designed, highly-efficient heat sink, a diode bar is able to produce up to 50 watts of laser output power. A single high-power diode module consists of: (1) a semiconductor wafer bar; (2) a micro channel cooling device, on which the laser bar is mounted; and (3) a micro-lens system, which is mounted in front of the laser bar and which collimates the laser beam in the high-divergent optical axis. Power can be increased by stacking several diode modules on top of each other. Through optical combination of such stacks, output power in the kilowatt range can be achieved. Diode lasers typically have larger spot diameters when focused, and are typically used for surface treatment, soldering and plastic welding.

THE COMPANY’S LASER PRODUCTS

The Company distinguishes itself from the majority of its competitors who specialize in only one or two of the three principal laser technologies for material processing by offering its customers CO₂, solid-state and diode laser sources and solutions in a variety of configurations and options. As a technological leader in CO₂ lasers, solid-state and diode lasers, the Company is able to meet a broad range of its customers’ cutting, welding, and marking requirements. The Company’s lasers all deliver a high-quality beam at guaranteed power outputs and feature compact design, high processing speed, flexibility, low operating and maintenance costs, and easy integration into the customer’s production process. The Company’s engineers and other technical experts work directly with the customer in the Company’s applications centers to develop and customize the optimal solution for the customers manufacturing requirements.

The Company currently offers a comprehensive range of laser products and related services for three principal material processing applications:

• cutting and welding (macro applications);

• marking; and

• fine cutting, fine welding, and perforating (micro applications).

5

Besides offering laser systems for some specialized niche applications, the Company works directly with its customers to develop and customize optimal solutions for their unique manufacturing requirements. In developing its laser-based solutions, the Company offers customers its expertise in:

• product development and manufacturing services based on more than 30 years of laser technology experience and applications know-how;

• application and process development, which means developing new laser-based applications for manufacturing customers and assisting them in integrating lasers into their production processes;

• system engineering, which means advising customers on machine design, including tooling, automation and controls for customers in need of “turn-key” solutions; and

• extensive after-sales support of its laser products, including technical support, field service, maintenance and training programs, and rapid spare parts delivery.

The following table sets forth the Company’s net sales of laser products used for macro applications and of laser products used for marking and micro applications in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004:

	September 30,
Product Category*	2006		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Laser macro products	$	207,258	$	189,241	$	158,820
Laser marking and micro products		213,632		185,950		163,808
	$	420,890	$	375,191	$	322,628

* For each product category, net sales include sales of service (including training, maintenance and repair) and spare parts.

The laser sources sold by the Company consist of a laser head (containing the lasing medium, resonator, source of excitation, resonator mirrors and cooling mechanism), power supply, and microcontroller (for control and monitoring). For a more detailed discussion of the components of a laser source, see “Laser Technology”. Products are offered in different configurations and utilize different design principles according to the desired application.

The following table sets forth the Company’s product categories by principal markets and principal applications:

PRODUCT CATEGORY	PRINCIPAL MARKETS	PRINCIPAL APPLICATIONS
Laser macro products	Machine tool	Cutting and welding of metals
	Automotive	Cutting and welding of metals
Laser marking products	Semiconductor and electronics	Marking of integrated circuits, electronic components, smart cards
	Automotive	Marking of labels and car components
Laser micro products	Dental and jewelry, medical components, semiconductor and electronics	Spot welding, fine cutting, micro structuring
	Paper, plastic foils	Perforating of cigarette tip paper and packaging foils

6

LASER MACRO PRODUCTS

The Company’s business strategy for its macro laser business is to grow its revenues by:

• increasing its market share in its existing CO₂ laser market through increased sales of its low- and high- power, diffusion cooled, wave guide Slab lasers;

• developing diffusion-cooled Slab lasers with higher output power to achieve higher welding depths and faster speeds and thereby widen their potential usage;

• further developing the Remote Welding System, Tube Welding, Profile Welding, and Scanner Welding concepts;

• continuing ongoing product engineering for its diode pumped, solid state lasers to further penetrate the market and to further increase the output power for heavy automotive applications.

The Company’s family of CO₂ laser products for macro applications, and their principal markets and applications, are discussed below.

LASER SERIES	POWER RANGE	MODE OF EXCITATION	PRINCIPAL MARKETS	APPLICATIONS
DC Slab Series	1.0 kW - 8.0 kW	High Frequency	Machine tool	Cutting and welding
HFSeries	4.0 kW - 8.0 kW	High Frequency	Automotive	Welding
SC Series	100 W - 600 W	High Frequency	Machine tool	Cutting and structuring
XL Series	1.0 kW - 1.5 kW	Direct Current	Machine tool	Cutting and welding
STS Series	2.0 kW - 5.0 kW	Direct Current	Machine tool	Cutting and welding
FH Series	6.0 kW - 7. kW	Direct Current	Machine tool	Cutting and welding

The Company believes that it is the only laser manufacturer of diffusion cooled, Slab-based lasers in the high-power range. In the DC Slab Series laser design, a radio-frequency excited gas discharge occurs between two water-cooled electrodes that have a large surface area that permits maximum heat dissipation. The core diffusion cooled, wave-guide technology is protected by three patents, and the Company has exclusive license rights to this technology on a worldwide basis for power levels above 500 watts for material processing applications. Principal markets for the Slab Series lasers are the machine tool and automotive industries.

The Company’s HF Series lasers combine proven cross-flow design principles with modern high-frequency discharge excitation technology. The Company ships this product predominantly to customers in the automotive industry, and their sub-suppliers, in the United States and Europe, where it has been used in a significant number of welding applications, including transmissions, tailored blanks, steel tubes and many other car parts and components.

The Company’s XL, STS, and FH Series fast-axial flow CO₂ lasers are used for both cutting and welding applications marketed under the PRC brand. In the fast-axial flow principle, the gas discharge occurs in a tube in the same direction as the resonator, through which the laser gas mixture flows at a high speed. XL, STS, and FH Series products are used primarily by the machine tool industry.

The Company’s SC Series diffusion cooled, wave-guide CO₂ lasers are developed and produced by Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd.. The SC Series are sealed-off lasers, which are also based on the Slab laser principle used for the DC Slab Series. These lasers are used for cutting and structuring applications. Principal markets are the machine tool and automotive industries.

The Company’s family of solid-state laser products for macro applications, and their principal markets, are discussed below.

LASER SERIES	POWER RANGE	MODE OF EXCITATION	PRINCIPAL MARKETS	APPLICATIONS
DP Series	1.0 kW - 4.0 kW	Laser Diodes	Automotive	Cutting and welding
DS Series	1.0 kW - 3.0 kW	Laser Diodes	Automotive	Cutting and welding
LY Products	1.0 kW	Flash lamp	Automotive	Cutting and welding

7

Rofin’s DP/DS/LY Series of continuous wave, solid-state lasers are designed exclusively for use with flexible fiber-optic beam delivery systems, making them particularly well-suited for integration into complex production systems for cutting and welding applications. The LY product is a flash lamp pumped solid state laser mainly targeting low price markets. The key competitive advantages of the DP/DS Series lasers are the fact that they are diode-pumped and that they are designed to allow multiple power output configurations. These configurations include continuous wave, pulsed and power ramping modes, which allow Rofin to address a wide range of customer applications. In addition, several features of the DP/DS Series laser are designed for easy maintenance, such as the simple modular resonator design, easily accessed power supply and PC-based controller equipped with a modem, which allows communication with a remote service center. The diode pumping technology is characterized by high beam quality and high efficiency. These lasers are used principally in the automotive industry.

The Company’s family of diode laser products for welding, soldering and surface treatment applications, and their principal markets, are discussed below.

LASER SERIES	POWER RANGE	MODE OF EXCITATION	PRINCIPAL MARKETS	APPLICATIONS
Diode Lasers	10 W - 3.6 kW	Direct Current	Electronics Machine tool	Soldering Surface treatment

The Company’s diode lasers are designed to meet the requirements of a wide range of welding, soldering, and surface treatment applications. The Company’s high-power laser diodes can be stacked into arrays achieving output powers in the multiple kilowatt range. In addition to their use in the automotive, machine tool and electronics markets, these lasers are also sold into the medical device and research markets. Additionally, laser diodes are sold as components both internally and externally.

LASER MARKING PRODUCTS

The company entered the laser-marking business in 1989 when it acquired Laser Optronic GmbH from Coherent General Inc. and designed and introduced the “PowerLine” laser marker. Since then the Company has developed a broad line of market leading laser markers that deliver optimal results in terms of quality and speed on a wide range of materials. Based on its vast experience, ROFIN offers standardized and customized laser marking systems for use in various industrial segments. Strength and experience in research and development, application and software ensure innovative, tailored solutions which meet most exigent customer demands. The Company’s laser marking products incorporate high value-added software –VisualLaser Marker and LaserCAD - to facilitate use in the customer’s own environment.

The Company believes that the following factors have contributed to the growth that it has experienced in the laser marking business:
	•	the Company’s ability to tailor its laser marking solutions to the customer’s requirements;
	•	the Company’s expertise in solid-state laser beam power, mode structure and high-frequency switching capability which provides optimal quality in terms of marking contrast and speed on a wide variety of materials;
	•	the Company’s proprietary software – VisualLaserMarker and LaserCAD - which provides an interface between the laser marking products and the customer’s computers and supports a broad range of network communication software; and
	•	the Company’s innovative character which is reflected in cutting-edge products which satisfy standard as well as complex market requirements.

8

The Company’s business strategy for its laser marking business is four-fold:

• to expand its position in worldwide laser marking markets with particular focus on the automotive, semiconductor and electronics industries;

• to offer a balanced product portfolio covering different technologies which addresses high-end and general application markets;

• to practice market and application development with existing and new products; and

• to capitalize on its installed base of lasers by cross-selling the Company’s products to the existing customers.

The Company’s family of laser marking products is as follows:

LASER SERIES	POWER RANGE	MODE OF EXCITATION	PRINCIPAL MARKETS	APPLICATIONS
PowerLine StarMark Series	2 W – 120 W	laser diodes, flash lamps or CO2	Semiconductor, electronics, general marking applications	IC marking, marking of metals plastics and organic materials, Day and Night design
MultiScan VectorScan	100 W	High Frequency	Packaging	Consumer goods marking
LabelMarker E Easymark	Stand-alone laser based system Laser workstation		Automotive general marking applications, medical components, tool industry	Label marking Metal and plastics marking
SLM series CombiLine E Series	Laser work station for integration of a wide range of ROFIN laser markers		general marking applications	Metal and plastics marking

PowerLine/StarMark Series – The Company’s standard PowerLine and StarMark laser marking products consist of a range of 2 watts to 120 watts lasers with a galvo-head, a personal computer with state-of-the-art processor and Rofin’s proprietary VisualLaserMarker and LaserCAD software. The modular design of the PowerLine and StarMark markers with 19” components enable the customers to order the most suitable configuration for their production processes or systems (e.g. OEM customers may order the laser head and 19” modules, for easy integration into the system specified by the end user). The PowerLine and StarMark solid-state lasers incorporate either diode modules or a dual or single lamp ceramic cavity design using “long-life” lamps both of which result in higher output power (and therefore higher marking speeds), higher energy efficiency (and therefore reduced operating costs), high beam quality (and therefore constant and reliable marking quality), and longer service intervals. New-generation, completely air-cooled solutions ensure besides compact dimensions further increase in efficiency. The Company’s proprietary VisualLaserMarker and LaserCAD software provide the customers with a user-friendly software environment that allows them to select fonts, import graphics, preview marking and control all laser parameters and job programs. Special options and accessories include a double marking head allowing speeds of up to 1,200 characters per second in certain applications (most notably marking of integrated circuits), as well as beam-switching and -splitting options for marking of products in multiple production lines using a single laser. Their main application - among a wide variety of possible applications - is the marking of plastics and smartcards in the semiconductor and electronics industries.

MultiScan VS – This vector scanning marker utilizes a 100 watts sealed-off CO₂ laser and features the ability to mark components that are moving at high speeds. The main application is the marking of consumer goods in the packaging industry.

LabelMarker E - This stand-alone laser based system is Rofin’s state-of-the art solution when it comes to high demands concerning speed and reliability in the process of label marking. The LabelMarker E ensures high efficiency and a short marking time due to an integrated, powerful laser. Flexible parameter settings enable the marking of pictures and machine readable symbols. As an elaborate all-in-one solution, the LabelMarker E is compact and comfortable. This laser system with the safety class 1 can be used in any production area without additional safety requirements.

9

EasyMark - EasyMark is a class 1 transportable desktop device. The 100 V – 240 V connection and an integrated cooling based on thermo-electrical technology guarantee quick and easy initial operation. The EasyMark offers a program-controlled z axis and a rotary axis which can optionally be integrated. An aluminum T-slot plate facilitates mounting of customer-specific workpiece carriers. Processing of workpieces of different size and shape is thus possible.

SLM Series / CombiLine E Series – These compact laser workstations have been designed for small and medium-size batches. They integrate a wide range of ROFIN laser markers depending on the customer’s specific application. Supply units are incorporated in the housing to provide efficient use of the floor space. Different versions either with rotary or work table with various axes enable exact adaptation to the required tasks.

LASER MICRO PRODUCTS

After the acquisition of Baasel Lasertech, the Company formed a separate sales and marketing group focused on micro applications. This group markets and sells a broad range of laser products, including lamp pumped, pulsed, solid-state lasers for various spot welding and fine cutting applications, CO₂ Slab lasers for perforating applications, Q switched, solid-state lasers for surface structuring and diode lasers for soldering and plastic welding applications. Relying on its many years of experience in perforating cigarette paper, the Company is pursuing new perforating applications in the packaging industry.

The Company’s business strategy for its micro applications business is to:

• further increase its share of the manual spot welding market in the jewelry and dental industries and develop customers in other industries that use a similar product and technology for industrial applications, such as tool repair;

• focus on manufacturers of medical instruments and implants within the medical device industry using mainly the applications cutting and welding

• increase its sales of perforating systems to the packaging industry for applications like easy-tear and special perforated foils for food packaging that allow the transfer of air and keep moisture in packaged goods; and

• develop a new market for plastic welding, glass cutting, and solar-cell structuring applications.

The Company’s family of laser products for micro applications is as follows:

LASER SERIES	POWER RANGE	MODE OF EXCITATION	PRINCIPAL MARKETS	APPLICATIONS
StarWeld Series	20 W - 500 W	Flash Lamp	Jewelry, Medical Device Electronic	Spot welding
DS Disc Series	60 W - 750 W	Diode	Electronics	Cutting/Structuring
StarCut Series	12 W - 150 W	Flash Lamp/Diode	Medical	Fine cutting
PerfoLas Systems	n.a.	n.a.	Paper	Perforating
StarShape Systems	n.a.	n.a.	Packaging	Perforating
Series 800	2 W - 500 W	Flash Lamp	OEM	Micro/Marking
Series 600	25 W - 100 W	Flash Lamp	OEM	Micro/Marking
Series LDP	10 W - 200 W	Diode	OEM	Micro/Marking
Series LEP	4 W - 6 W	Diode	OEM	Micro/Marking

StarWeld Series – Rofin’s standard StarWeld laser products consist of pulsed solid-state lasers in the range of 20 watts to 500 watts. Although the StarWeld Series has a wide variety of possible applications, its main application is the fine welding of jewelry, electronics, and dental parts.

DS Disc Series – Rofin’s Disc laser products use laser diodes as the source of excitation to pump a thin crystal (disc). The output power is in the range of 60 watts to 750 watts and the main application is structuring or cutting of electronics.

10

StarCut Series – Rofin’s StarCut laser products use pulsed solid-state lasers in the range of 12 watts to 150 watts. Their main application is the fine cutting of medical devices.

PerfoLas Systems – The PerfoLas Systems consist of a high-power CO₂ laser and a specially designed beam delivery and paper handling system that includes a laser beam splitter (PerfoLas Multiplexer) which allows customers to drill more than 500,000 holes per second into paper or foils. The main application for these lasers is perforation of cigarette tip paper.

StarShape Systems – The StarShape Systems consist of a CO₂ or solid-state laser in combination with a galvo scanning head and is used for precise cutting, drilling, and surface structuring.

The Series 600 and 800 are flashlamp pumped, solid-state lasers sold to OEM-customers and system integrators for various micro and marking applications.

The Series LDP and LEP are diode pumped, solid-state lasers sold to OEM-customers and system integrators for various micro and marking applications.

APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT

In addition to manufacturing and selling laser sources for macro applications and marking and micro applications, Rofin operates application centers in eight countries where it develops laser-based solutions for customers seeking alternatives to conventional manufacturing techniques. Revenues derived from application development are not a significant component of total revenues. Applications development is generally a support service to the sales and marketing function and is performed to customize the laser to the particular needs of the customer. The Company currently has approximately 30 employees in applications development.

MARKETS AND CUSTOMERS

Rofin sells its laser products and laser-based system solutions to a wide range of industries. Our three principal markets are the machine tool, automotive, and semiconductor and electronics industries. The following table sets forth the allocation of the Company’s total laser sales among our principal markets:

	Fiscal Years
Principal Market	2006		2005		2004		Primary Applications
Machine Tool	31	%	33	%	33	%	Cutting and welding
Semiconductor and Electronics	18	%	12	%	16	%	Marking of integrated circuits, electronic components and smart cards
Automotive	7	%	9	%	14	%	Cutting, welding and component marking
	56	%	54	%	63	%

The remaining 44%, 46%, and 37%, of total laser sales in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, were attributable to customers in a wide variety of other industries including aerospace, consumer goods, medical device manufacturers, job shops, jewelry, universities and institutes. No one customer accounted for over 10% of total sales in any of these periods.

11

SALES, MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION

Rofin sells its products in approximately 40 countries to OEMs, systems integrators and industrial end-users who have in-house engineering resources capable of integrating Rofin’s products into their own production systems. Lasers for cutting applications are marketed and sold principally to OEMs in the machine tool industry who sell laser cutting machines incorporating Rofin’s products without any substantial involvement by Rofin. Lasers for welding applications are marketed and sold both to systems integrators and to end-users. Laser marking products are marketed and sold directly to end-users and to OEMs for integration into their handling systems (mainly for integrated circuit and smart card marking applications). Laser micro products are marketed and sold directly to end-users and to OEM-customers (mainly for jewelry and dental applications). In the case of both welding lasers and laser marking products, the end-user is significantly involved in the selection of the laser component and will often specify to the OEM that it desires a Rofin laser. In these cases, Rofin’s application engineers work directly with the end-user to optimize the application’s performance and demonstrate the advantages of the Company’s products.

Rofin has approximately 115 direct sales engineers operating in 24 countries, approximately 35 of whom are dedicated to marketing lasers for macro applications and approximately 80 of whom are dedicated to marketing laser for marking and micro applications. Rofin sales engineers work either in a well-defined geographic territory or are dedicated to specific industries or applications. In addition, Rofin has 20 independent representatives marketing the Company’s laser products in Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Denmark, Finland, India, Israel, Mexico, Northern Africa, the Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, Eastern Europe, China, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. These independent representatives provide Rofin with sales leads and opportunities, but do not distribute Rofin’s products. All sales and delivery of product are conducted by the Company. Twelve of the independent representative agreements are on an exclusive basis, with the other eight on a non-exclusive basis. These agreements provide for a standard percentage of the net sales price to be paid as commissions to the representatives. The duration of the agreements is usually one year (with an automatic one-year extension) and a six months cancellation clause.

Rofin directs its worldwide sales and marketing of lasers for macro applications from its offices in Hamburg (Germany), and of laser diode components, from Mainz (Germany) and Tucson, Arizona. Worldwide sales and marketing of laser marking products is directed from Rofin’s offices in Gunding-Munich (Germany) and, for laser micro products and power supplies, from Starnberg (Germany). In Europe, Rofin also maintains sales and service offices in Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

North American sales of Rofin’s macro and micro laser products are managed out of the Company’s Plymouth, Michigan, facility and marking products are managed out of its Boxborough, Massachusetts, facility.The Company also maintains a sales office in Tempe, Arizona, to support the expansion of Rofin’s laser marking business in the North American market and a new sales and service office in Mississauga, Canada to support the Canadian market.

PRC Laser directs its worldwide sales and marketing of lasers for macro applications from its office in Landing, New Jersey, while Lee Laser directs its worldwide sales and marketing of laser for micro applications from its office in Orlando, Florida. Both companies sell their products independently under their own brand.

The Company maintains sales and service offices in Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and China to cover the Asia/Pacific region. Over the next five years, the Company expects demand for industrial lasers to increase in the Asia/Pacific region. The Company believes that the geographic market with the greatest long-term potential over the next 10 to 15 years is China, principally due to the expansion of domestic automobile and semiconductor and electronic production in that country. The Company has a technology license agreement with the Nanjing Electric Laser Center, or NELC, under which NELC manufactures CO₂ laser sources for sale in the Chinese market.

CUSTOMER SERVICE, REPLACEMENT PARTS AND COMPONENTS

During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, approximately 35% of the Company’s revenues were generated from sales of after-sales services, replacement parts and components for laser products. The Company believes that a high level of customer support is necessary to successfully develop and maintain long-term relationships with its OEM and end-user customers. This close relationship is maintained as customers’ needs change and evolve.

12

Recognizing the importance of its existing and growing installed multinational customer base, the Company has expanded its local service and support platform into new geographic regions. Rofin has 312 customer service personnel. The Company’s field service and in-house technical support personnel receive ongoing training with respect to the Company’s laser products, maintenance procedures, laser -operating techniques, and processing technology. Most of the Company’s OEM-customers also provide customer service and support to end-users.

Many of Rofin’s laser products are operated 24 hours a day in high speed, quality-oriented manufacturing operations. Accordingly, the Company provides 24 hour, year-round service support to its customers in the United States, Germany, and the majority of other countries in which it operates. The Company plans to continue adopting similar service support elsewhere. In addition, eight-hour response time is provided to certain key customers. This support includes field service personnel who reside in close proximity to the Company’s installed base. The Company provides customers with process diagnostic and verification techniques, as well as specialized training in the operation and maintenance of its systems. The Company also offers regularly scheduled and intensive training programs and customized maintenance contracts for its customers.

Of Rofin’s 312 customer service personnel, approximately 200 employees operate in the field in 50 countries. Field service personnel are also involved in the installation of the Company’s systems.

Rofin’s approach to the sale of replacement parts is closely linked to the Company’s strategic focus on rapid customer response. The Company provides around-the-clock order entry and provides same or next day delivery of parts worldwide in order to minimize disruption to customers’ manufacturing operations. Rofin typically provides a minimum one-year warranty for its products with warranty extensions negotiated on a case-by-case basis. It agrees to after-sales service and parts supply up to a period of 10 years, if requested by a customer. The Company’s growing base of installed laser sources and laser-based systems is expected to continue to generate a stable source of parts and service sales.

In addition, the Company offers components such as laser diodes, fiber optic delivery systems, and power supplies. These high technology components are mainly integrated by other laser manufacturer into their product portfolio.

COMPETITION

Laser Macro Products

The market for laser macro products and systems is fragmented and includes a large number of competitors, many of which are small or privately owned or which compete with Rofin on a limited geographic, industry-specific or application-specific basis. The Company also competes in certain target markets with competitors that are part of large industrial groups and have access to substantially greater financial and other resources than Rofin. Competition among laser manufacturers is also based on attracting and retaining qualified engineering and technical personnel. The overall competitive position of the Company will depend upon a number of factors, including product performance and reliability, price, customer support, manufacturing quality, the compatibility of its products with existing laser systems, and the continued development of products utilizing the technologies of diode lasers and diode pumped, solid-state lasers.

Rofin believes it is among the top three suppliers of laser sources in the worldwide market for macro applications. Companies such as Trumpf and Fanuc (for high-power CO₂ lasers), Excel/Synrad and Coherent (for low-power CO₂ lasers), Trumpf and IPG (for solid-state lasers) and Laserline and Jenoptik (for diode lasers and laser diodes) compete in certain of the markets in which Rofin operates. However, in the Company’s opinion, none of these companies compete in all of the industries, applications and geographic markets currently served by Rofin. We believe that only Trumpf has a product range and worldwide presence similar to that of the Company. The Company believes that it has a competitive advantage over these companies due to its exclusive access (for material applications of 500 watts and above) to the patented diffusion cooling technology incorporated in its CO₂ Slab lasers. See “Intellectual Property”.

13

Laser Marking and Micro Products

Significant competitive factors in the laser marking and micro market include system performance and flexibility, cost, the size of each manufacturer’s installed base, capability for customer support and breadth of product line. Because many of the components required to develop and produce a laser product for marking and micro applications are commercially available, barriers to entry into this market are low and the Company expects new competitive products to enter this market. The Company believes that its product range for marking and micro applications will compete favorably in this market primarily due to the performance and price characteristics of such products.

The Company’s laser marking products compete with conventional ink-based and acid-etching technologies, as well as with laser mask-marking. The Company’s micro products compete with conventional welding, etching and spark erosion technologies. The Company believes that its principal competitors in the laser marking and micro market include Trumpf, GSI Group, Unitek Miyachi, Lasag, IPG and Excel/Control Laser.

Rofin also competes with manufacturers of conventional non-laser products in applications such as welding, drilling, soldering, cutting, and marking. The Company believes that as manufacturing industries continue to modernize, seek to reduce production costs and require more precise and flexible production, the features of laser-based systems will become more desirable than systems incorporating conventional material processing techniques and processes. The increased acceptance of these laser applications by industrial users will be enhanced by laser product line expansion to include lower and higher power CO₂ lasers, advancements in fiber-optic beam delivery systems, improvements in reliability, and the introduction of lower and higher power diode lasers and diode pumped, solid-state lasers capable of performing heavy industrial material processing and marking and micro applications.

MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY

Rofin manufactures and tests its high-power CO₂ and solid-state laser macro products at its Hamburg (Germany), Plymouth, Michigan, Landing, New Jersey, Atsugi-shi (Japan) and Kingston upon Hull (UK) facilities. The Company’s laser marking products are manufactured and tested at its facilities in Gunding-Munich (Germany), Starnberg (Germany), Singapore, Boxborough, Massachusetts and Orlando, Florida. Rofin’s micro application products are manufactured and tested in Starnberg (Germany). The Company’s diode laser products are manufactured and tested at its Mainz (Germany) and Tucson, Arizona facilities. The Company’s low-power CO₂ laser products are manufactured and tested in Kingston upon Hull (UK). Coating of Rofin’s Slab laser electrodes is performed at the Overath (Germany) facility. The Company’s fiber optics and beam delivery systems are manufactured and tested in Gothenburg (Sweden), and power supplies are manufactured and tested in Starnberg (Germany).

Given the competitive nature of the laser business, the Company focuses substantial efforts on maintaining and enhancing the efficiency and quality of its manufacturing operations. The Company utilizes just-in-time and cell-based manufacturing techniques to reduce manufacturing cycle times and inventory levels, thus enabling it to offer on-time delivery and high-quality products to its customers.

Rofin’s in-house manufacturing includes only those manufacturing operations that are critical to achieve quality standards or protect intellectual property. These manufacturing activities consist primarily of product development, testing of components and subassemblies (some of which are supplied from within the Company and others of which are supplied by third party vendors and then integrated into the Company’s finished products), assembly and final testing of the completed product, as well as proprietary software design and hardware/software integration. Although the Company minimizes the number of suppliers and component types wherever practicable it has at least two sources of supply for key items. Rofin has a qualifying program for its vendors and generally seeks to build long-term relationships with such vendors. The Company purchases certain major components from single suppliers. The Company estimates that 18% of its revenues are from the sale of products that require specialized components currently only available from single sources. Rofin has written agreements with such suppliers and has not had material delays in supplies from these sources. The Company believes that it could, if necessary, purchase such components from alternative sources, within four to six months, following appropriate qualification of such new vendors.

14

Rofin is committed to meeting internationally recognized manufacturing standards. Its Hamburg, Gunding-Munich, Starnberg, and Mainz facilities are ISO 9001 certified. In addition, the following facilities are ISO 9002 certified: Pamplona (Spain), Milan (Italy), Paris (France), Willerby (UK), Gothenburg (Sweden) and Singapore.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, Rofin’s net spending on research and development was $24.0 million, $22.6 million, and $20.5 million, respectively. The Company’s net spending on research and development reflects receipt of funding under German government and European Union grants totaling $1.2 million, $0.9 million, and $1.1 million, in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Rofin has approximately 190 employees engaged in product research and development.

Rofin’s research and development activities are directed at meeting customers’ manufacturing needs and application processes. Core competencies include CO₂ gas lasers, solid-state lasers, diode lasers, precision optics, electronic power supplies, fiber optics, beam delivery, control interfaces, software programming and systems integration. The Company strives for customer-driven development activities and promotes the use of alliances with key customers and joint development programs in a wide range of its target markets.

The Company’s research and development activities are carried out in nine centers in Hamburg, Gunding-Munich, Starnberg, and Mainz (all Germany), Kingston upon Hull (UK), Gothenburg (Sweden), Plymouth, Michigan, Landing, New Jersey, and Orlando, Florida (all USA), and are centrally coordinated and managed. Rofin maintains close working relationships with the leading industrial, government and university research laboratories in Germany, including the Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology in Aachen, the Institute for “Technische Physik” of the German Space and Aerospace Research Center in Stuttgart, the Fraunhofer Institute for Material Science in Dresden, the Laser Center in Hannover, and elsewhere around the world, including the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. These relationships include funding of research, joint development programs, personnel exchange programs, and licensing of patents developed at these institutes.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Rofin owns intellectual property, which includes patents, proprietary software, technical know-how and expertise, designs, process techniques and inventions.

While policies and procedures are in place to protect critical intellectual property rights, Rofin believes that its success depends to a larger extent on the innovative skills, know-how, technical competence and abilities of Rofin’s personnel. The Company is also a worldwide licensee of two U.S. patents, one Japanese patent and their corresponding foreign counterparts, which expire in 2007, 2009, and 2010, respectively. These licenses are exclusive for industrial material processing applications of 500 watts and above for the diffusion cooled, wave-guide technology used in the Company’s Slab Series CO₂ lasers and non-exclusive for applications below 500 watts. In Rofin’s view, the technology protected by these three patents represents a significant step forward in industrial laser technology for material processing and is an important source of Rofin’s current revenues and future growth and profitability.

Rofin protects its intellectual property in a number of ways including, in certain circumstances, patents. Rofin has sought patent protection primarily in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Rofin currently holds 158 separate patents for inventions relating to lasers, processes and power supplies with expiration dates ranging from 2007 to 2024. In addition, 44 patent applications have been filed and are under review by the relevant patent authorities. Rofin requires its employees and certain of its customers, suppliers, representatives, agents and consultants to enter into confidentiality agreements to further safeguard Rofin’s intellectual property.

Rofin, from time to time, receives notices from third parties alleging infringement of such parties’ patent or other intellectual property rights by Rofin’s products. While these notices are common in the laser industry and Rofin has in the past been able to develop non-infringing technology or license necessary patents or technology on commercially reasonable terms, Rofin cannot assure that it would in the future prevail in any litigation seeking damages or expenses from Rofin or to enjoin Rofin from selling its products on the basis of such alleged infringement. Nor can Rofin assure that it would be able to develop any non-infringing technology or to license any valid and infringed patents on commercially reasonable terms. In the event any third party made a valid claim against Rofin or its customers and a license were not made available to Rofin on commercially reasonable terms, Rofin would be adversely affected.

15

From time to time, Rofin files notices of opposition to certain patents on laser technologies held by others, including academic institutions and competitors of Rofin, which the Company believes could inhibit its ability to develop laser products for industrial material processing applications.

ORDER BACKLOG

The Company’s order backlog was $84.9 million, $76.3 million, and $72.8 million, as of September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively. The Company’s order backlog, which contains relatively little service, training and spare parts, represents approximately three months of laser shipments. The increase in the Company’s order backlog from September 30, 2005 to September 30, 2006, was attributable to higher orders for macro applications. The fluctuation of the U.S. dollar in fiscal 2006 had an unfavorable effect of approximately $1.6 million on year-to-year order backlog. The increase in the Company’s order backlog from September 30, 2004 to September 30, 2005 was attributable to higher orders for micro applications. The fluctuation of the U.S. dollar in fiscal 2005 had a favorable effect of approximately $2.2 million on year-to-year order backlog.

An order is entered into backlog by Rofin when a purchase order with an assigned delivery date has been received. Delivery schedules range from one week to six months, depending on the size, complexity and availability of the product or system ordered, although typical delivery dates for laser source products range between 6-12 weeks from the date an order is placed. Although there is a risk that customers may cancel or delay delivery of their orders, orders for standard non-customized lasers can typically be allocated to other customers without significant additional costs. The Company also manages this risk by establishing the right to charge a cancellation fee that covers any material and developmental costs incurred prior to the order being cancelled. Enforcement of this right is dependent on many factors including, but not limited to, the customer’s requested length of delay, the number of other outstanding orders with the same customer and the ability to quickly convert the canceled order to another sale.

The Company anticipates shipping the present backlog during fiscal 2007. However, the Company’s backlog at any given date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future period.

EMPLOYEES

At September 30, 2006, Rofin had 1,490 full-time employees, of which 840 were in Germany, 260 in the United States, 3 in Canada, 40 in France, 47 in Italy, 110 in the United Kingdom, 30 in Spain, 8 in the Netherlands, 39 in Sweden, 11 in Belgium, 28 in Singapore, 11 in Korea, 14 in Taiwan, 19 in China, and 30 in Japan, whereas at September 30, 2005, Rofin had 1,413 full-time employees, of which 832 were in Germany, 242 in the United States, 39 in France, 44 in Italy, 101 in the United Kingdom, 26 in Spain, 8 in the Netherlands, 29 in Sweden, 10 in Belgium, 24 in Singapore, 11 in Korea, 12 in Taiwan, 7 in China, and 28 in Japan. The average number of employees for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, was 1,443.

While the Company’s employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage, slowdown or strike, the Company’s employees at its Hamburg and Starnberg facilities are each represented by a nine-person works council and in Gunding-Munich by a seven-person works council. Additionally, Hamburg and Gunding-Munich are represented by a four-person central works council. Matters relating to compensation, benefits and work rules are negotiated and resolved between management and the works council for the relevant location. The Company considers its relations with its employees to be good.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The majority of the Company’s laser products sold in the United States are classified as Class IV Laser Products under applicable rules and regulations of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (“CDRH”) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The same classification system is applied in the European markets. Safety rules are formulated with “Deutsche Industrie Norm” (i.e., German Industrial Standards) or ISO standards, which are internationally harmonized.

CDRH regulations generally require a self-certification procedure pursuant to which a manufacturer must file with the CDRH with respect to each product incorporating a laser device, periodic reporting of sales and purchases and compliance with product labeling standards. The Company’s laser products for macro, micro and laser marking applications can result in injury to human tissue if directed at an individual or otherwise misused.

16

The Company believes that its laser products for macro, micro and marking applications are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws for the manufacture of laser devices.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Company makes available, free of charge on its internet website, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). You can find these reports on the Company’s website at www.rofin.com under the heading “Investor Relations”.

These reports may also be obtained at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at (202) 942-8090. You may also access this information at the SEC’s website (http://www.sec.gov). This site contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

DOWNTURNS IN THE INDUSTRY, PARTICULARLY IN THE MACHINE TOOL, AUTOMOTIVE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR AND ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES MAY HAVE, IN THE FUTURE, A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR SALES AND PROFITABILITY.

Our business depends substantially upon capital expenditures particularly by manufacturers in the machine tool, automotive, and semiconductor and electronics industries. We estimate that approximately 56% of our laser sales during fiscal year 2006 were to these three industry markets. These industries are cyclical and have historically experienced periods of oversupply, resulting in significantly reduced demand for capital equipment, including the products manufactured and marketed by us. For the foreseeable future, our operations will continue to depend upon capital expenditures in these industries, which, in turn, depend upon the market demand for their products. Decreased demand from manufacturers in these industries, for example, during a downturn, may lead to decreased demand for our products. Although such decreased demand would reduce our sales, we may not be able to reduce expenses quickly, due in part to the need for continual investment in research and development and the need to maintain extensive ongoing customer service and support capability. Although we order materials for assembly in response to firm orders, the lead time for assembly and delivery of some of our products creates a risk that we may incur expenditures or purchase inventories for products which we cannot sell.

Accordingly, any downturn or slowdown in the machine tool, automotive, and semiconductor and electronics industries could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A HIGH PERCENTAGE OF OUR SALES ARE OVERSEAS AND OUR RESULTS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO THE IMPACT OF EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS.

Although we report our results in U.S. dollars, approximately 61% of our current sales are denominated in other currencies, including the Euro, Swedish krona, British pound, Singapore dollar, Japanese yen, Korean won, Taiwanese NT dollar, Canadian dollar, and Chinese RMB. The fluctuation of the Euro, and the other functional currencies, against the U.S. dollar has had the effect of increasing and decreasing (as applicable) reported net sales as well as cost of goods sold and gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses denominated in such foreign currencies when translated into U.S. dollars as compared to prior periods. Our subsidiaries will, from time to time, pay dividends in their respective functional currencies, thus presenting another area of potential currency exposure for us in the future.

We also face transaction risk from fluctuations in exchange rates between the various currencies in which we do business. We believe that a certain portion of the transaction risk of our operations in multiple currencies is mitigated by our hedging activities, utilizing forward exchange contracts and forward exchange options. We also continue to borrow in each operating subsidiary’s functional currency to reduce exposure to exchange gains and losses. However, there can be no assurance that changes in currency exchange rates will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

17

OUR INABILITY TO MANAGE THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.

Our products are currently marketed in approximately 40 countries, with Germany, the rest of Europe, the United States and the Asia/Pacific region being our principal markets. Our operations and sales in our principal markets are subject to risks inherent in international business activities, including:

• the general political and economic conditions in each such country or region;

• overlap of differing tax structures;

• management of an organization spread over various jurisdictions; and

• unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, such as import and export licensing requirements and trade restrictions.

Our failure to manage the risks associated with our international business operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our profitability may be adversely affected by economic slowdowns in the United States, Europe, or the Asia/Pacific region. A recession in these economies could trigger a decline in laser sales to the machine tool, automotive, or semiconductor/electronics industries, and any related weaknesses in their respective currencies could adversely affect customer demand for our products, the U.S. dollar value of our foreign currency denominated sales, and ultimately our consolidated results of operations.

WE DEPEND ON THE ABILITY OF OUR OEM-CUSTOMERS TO INCORPORATE OUR LASER PRODUCTS INTO THEIR SYSTEMS.

Our sales depend in part upon the ability of our OEM-customers to develop and sell systems that incorporate our laser products. Adverse economic conditions, large inventory positions, limited marketing resources, and other factors affecting these OEM-customers could have a substantial impact upon our financial results. We cannot provide assurances that our OEM-customers will not experience financial or other difficulties that could adversely affect their operations and, in turn, our financial condition or results of operations.

WE EXPERIENCED IN THE PAST, AND EXPECT TO EXPERIENCE IN THE FUTURE, FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR QUARTERLY RESULTS. THESE FLUCTUATIONS MAY INCREASE THE VOLATILITY OF OUR STOCK PRICE.

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience some fluctuations in our quarterly results. We believe that fluctuations in quarterly results may cause the market prices of our common stock, on the NASDAQ National Market and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, to fluctuate, perhaps substantially. Factors which may have an influence on the Company’s operating results in a particular quarter include:

• the timing of the receipt of orders from major customers;

• product mix;

• competitive pricing pressures;

• the relative proportions of domestic and international sales;

• our ability to design, manufacture and introduce new products on a cost-effective and timely basis;

• the delayed effect of incurrence of expenses to develop and improve marketing and service capabilities;

• foreign currency fluctuations;

• ability of our suppliers to produce and deliver components and parts, including sole or limited source components, in a timely manner, in the quantity desired and at the prices we have budgeted;

• our ability to control expenses; and

• costs related to acquisitions of businesses.

18

These and other factors make it difficult for us to release precise predictions regarding the results and the development of our business.

In addition, our backlog at any given time is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period. As our delivery schedule typically ranges from one week to six months, our sales will often reflect orders shipped in the same quarter that they are received. Moreover, customers may cancel or reschedule shipments and production difficulties could delay shipments. Accordingly, the Company’s results of operations are subject to significant fluctuations from quarter to quarter. See also “Business-Order Backlog”.

Other factors that we believe may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate, perhaps substantially, include announcements of new products, technologies or customers by us or our competitors, developments with respect to intellectual property and shortfalls in our operations relative to analysts’ expectations. In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general, and the shares of technology companies in particular, have experienced wide price fluctuations. These broad market and industry fluctuations, particularly in the semiconductor and electronics and automotive industries, may adversely affect the market prices of our common stock on the NASDAQ and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.

THE MARKETS FOR OUR PRODUCTS ARE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE AND INCREASED COMPETITION COULD INCREASE OUR COSTS, REDUCE OUR SALES OR CAUSE US TO LOSE MARKET SHARE.

The laser industry is characterized by significant price and technical competition. Our current and proposed laser products for macro and marking and micro applications compete with those of several well-established companies, some of which are larger and have substantially greater financial, managerial and technical resources, more extensive distribution and service networks, and larger installed customer bases than us.

We believe that competition will be particularly intense in the CO₂, diode laser, and solid-state laser markets, as many companies have committed significant research and development resources to pursue opportunities in these markets. There can be no assurance that we will successfully differentiate our current and proposed products from the products of our competitors or that the market place will consider our products to be superior to competing products. Because many of the components required to develop and produce a laser-based marking system are commercially available, barriers to entry into this market are relatively low, and we expect new competitive product entries in this market. To maintain our competitive position in these markets, we believe that we will be required to continue a high level of investment in engineering, research and development, marketing, and customer service and support. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to continue to make these investments, that we will be able to make the technological advances necessary to maintain our competitive position, or that our products will receive market acceptance. See also “Business - Competition”.

OUR FUTURE GROWTH AND COMPETITIVENESS DEPEND UPON OUR ABILITY TO DEVELOP NEW AND ENHANCED PRODUCTS TO MEET MARKET DEMAND AND TO INCREASE OUR MARKET SHARE FOR LASER MARKING AND MICRO PRODUCTS.

If we are to increase our laser sales in the near term, these sales will have to come through increases in market share for our existing products, through the development of new products, or through the acquisition of competitors or their products. To date, a substantial portion of our revenues has been derived from sales of high-powered CO₂ laser sources, solid-state laser sources, and diode lasers. In order to increase market demand for these products, we will need to devote substantial resources to:

• continuing to broaden our CO₂ laser product range;

• continuing to increase the output power of our CO₂ laser sources, diode lasers, and diode pumped, solid-state laser products; and

• continuing to reduce the manufacturing costs of our product range to achieve more attractive pricing.

A large part of our growth strategy depends upon being able to increase our worldwide market share for laser marking and micro products.

19

Our future success depends on our ability to anticipate our customers’ needs and develop products that address those needs. Our ability to control costs is limited by our need to invest in research and development. If we are unable to implement our strategy to develop new and enhanced products, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. We cannot provide assurance that we will successfully implement our business strategy or that any of the newly developed or enhanced products will achieve market acceptance or not be rendered obsolete or uncompetitive by products of other companies. See also “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business - The Company’s Laser Products”.

IF WE LOSE OUR KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE OUR BUSINESS OR ACHIEVE OUR OBJECTIVES.

Our future success depends in large part upon the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees at the operating level. These key employees include technical, sales and support personnel for our operations on a worldwide basis. If we lose the services of one or more of our executive officers or key employees, or if one or more of them decides to join a competitor or otherwise compete directly or indirectly with us, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our business objectives. If we lose the services of any of our key employees at the operating or regional level, we may not be able to replace them with similarly qualified personnel, which could harm our business.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY ACQUIRE NEW OPERATIONS OR INTEGRATE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS, WHICH COULD CAUSE OUR BUSINESS TO SUFFER.

An important part of our growth strategy is making strategic acquisitions of companies with complementary operations or products. We may be unable to successfully complete potential strategic acquisitions if we cannot reach agreement on acceptable terms or for other reasons. Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional debt or equity financing, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In connection with future acquisitions, we may assume the liabilities of the companies we acquire. Any debt that we incur to pay for future acquisition could contain covenants that restrict the manner in which we operate our business. Any new equity securities that we issue for this purpose would be dilutive to our existing stockholders. If we buy a company or a division of a company, we may experience difficulty integrating that company or division’s personnel and operations, which could negatively affect our operating results.

In addition:

• the key personnel of the acquired company may decide not to work for us;

• we may experience additional financial and accounting challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management and financial reporting;

• we may be held liable for risks and liabilities (including for environmental-related costs) as a result of our acquisitions, some of which we may not discover during our due diligence;

• our ongoing business may be disrupted or receive insufficient management attention; and

• we may not be able to realize the cost savings or other financial benefits we anticipated.

WE DEPEND ON LIMITED SOURCE SUPPLIERS THAT COULD CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL MANUFACTURING DELAYS AND INCREASE OUR COSTS IF A DISRUPTION IN SUPPLY OCCURS.

We estimate that 18% of our revenues are derived from sales of products that require specialized components only available from single sources. We also rely on a limited number of independent contractors to manufacture subassemblies for some of our products. There can be no assurance that, in the future, our current or alternative sources will be able to meet all of our demands on a timely basis. If one or more of our suppliers or subcontractors experiences difficulties that result in a reduction or interruption in supply to us, or if they fail to meet any of our manufacturing requirements, our business could be harmed until we are able to secure alternative sources, if any. If we are unable to find necessary parts or components on commercially reasonable terms, we could be required to reengineer our products to accommodate available substitutions which would increase our costs and/or have a material adverse effect on manufacturing schedules, product performance and market acceptance.

20

OUR FAILURE TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY OR TO AVOID LITIGATION FOR INFRINGEMENT OR MISAPPROPRIATION OF PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES COULD RESULT IN A LOSS OF REVENUES AND PROFITS.

From time to time, we receive notices from third parties alleging infringement of such parties’ patent or other proprietary rights by our products. While these notices are common in the laser industry and we have in the past been able to develop non-infringing technology or license necessary patents or technology on commercially reasonable terms, there can be no assurance that we would in the future prevail in any litigation seeking damages or expenses from us or to enjoin us from selling its products on the basis of such alleged infringement, or that we would be able to develop any non-infringing technology or license any valid and infringed patents on commercially reasonable terms. In the event any third party made a valid claim against us or our customers and a license was not made available to us on commercially reasonable terms, we would be adversely affected.

Our future success depends in part upon our intellectual property rights, including trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by us to protect our intellectual property rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation or that others will not develop competitive technologies or products.

We currently hold 158 United States and foreign patents on our laser sources, with expiration dates ranging from 2007 to 2024. We have also obtained licenses under certain patents covering lasers and related technology incorporated into our products. Of particular importance is the license of three patents related to the sales of our Slab Series CO₂ lasers, which we estimate to account for approximately 21% of our revenue. In addition, 44 patent applications have been filed and are under review by the relevant patent authorities. There can be no assurance that other companies are not investigating or developing other technologies that are similar to ours, that any patents will issue from any application filed by us or that, if patents do issue, the claims allowed will be sufficiently broad to deter or prohibit others from marketing similar products. In addition, there can be no assurance that any patents issued to us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that the rights thereunder will provide a competitive advantage to us. See also “Business - Intellectual Property.”

ANY DEFECTS IN OUR PRODUCTS OR CUSTOMER PROBLEMS ARISING FROM THE USE OF OUR PRODUCTS MAY SERIOUSLY HARM OUR BUSINESS AND REPUTATION.

Our laser products are technologically complex and may contain known and undetected errors or performance problems. In addition, performance problems can also be caused by the improper installation of our products by a customer. These errors or performance problems could result in customer dissatisfaction, which could harm our sales or customer relationships. In addition, these problems may cause us to incur significant warranty and repair costs and divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

21

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company’s manufacturing facilities include the following:

Location of Facility	Owned or Leased	Size (sq. ft.)	Primary Activity
Hamburg, Germany	Owned*	164,699	CO2 lasers, solid-state lasers, diode lasers
Starnberg, Germany	Leased	92,665	Laser marking and micro products, power supplies
Gunding-Munich, Germany	Leased	66,959	Solid-state lasers, laser marking products
Plymouth, Michigan	Leased	52,128	CO2 lasers, laser micro and marking systems
Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom	Leased	48,485	Low-power CO2 lasers
Orlando, Florida	Owned	35,207	Solid-state lasers
Landing, New Jersey	Owned/Leased	34,292	CO2 lasers
Mainz, Germany	Leased	32,054	Diode lasers and components
Boxborough, Massachusetts	Leased	22,000	Laser marking systems
Gothenburg, Sweden	Leased	15,225	Fiber optic production
Overath, Germany	Leased	12,417	Coating of materials
Sakai, Atsugi-shi, Japan	Leased	9,763	CO2 lasers
Pamplona, Spain	Owned	7,532	Laser marking systems
Singapore	Leased	6,047	Laser marking products
Tucson, Arizona	Leased	3,715	Components

* The facility is owned by RSL; the real property on which the facility is located is leased by RSL under a 99-year lease.

The Kingston upon Hull (United Kingdom) facility lease expires in 2012. The Gunding-Munich (Germany) facility lease expires in 2007. The Company resigned from the contract and intends to move to another facility in the beginning of 2008. The leases on its Japanese facilities in Atsugi-shi expire in 2007, with a renewal option for five years. The Mainz (Germany) facility lease expires in 2011 and 2015 and the Overath (Germany) facility leases expire in 2008. The Singapore facility lease expires in 2009. The Starnberg (Germany) main facility is leased until 2017 from a member of the Company’s board of directors and includes a clause to terminate the lease contract within a two-year notice period during the contract. The leases on its U.S. facilities in Boxborough, Massachusetts, Plymouth, Michigan, Landing, New Jersey, and Tucson, Arizona expire in 2010, 2012, 2007, and 2013 respectively. The Gothenburg (Sweden) facility lease expires in 2008, with a renewal option for three years.

The Company maintains sales, administration and research and development facilities at each of the Hamburg, Starnberg, Gunding-Munich, Mainz, Kingston upon Hull, Gothenburg, Plymouth, Landing, and Orlando locations. The Company also maintains sales and service offices worldwide, all of which are leased, with the exception of the Pamplona, Spain, and Seoul (South Korea) properties which are owned. In May 2006 the Company opened a sales and service office in Mississauga, Canada to support the Canadian market. The facility in Canada is leased.

The Company believes that its existing facilities are adequate to meet its currently projected needs for the next 12 months and that suitable additional or alternative space would be available, if necessary, in the future on commercially reasonable terms.

22

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company has been and is likely to be involved from time to time in litigation involving its intellectual property and ordinary routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.

The licensor of patents covering the technology used in certain of the Company’s CO₂ lasers has asserted that the Company has calculated royalties due in respect of certain sales of such CO₂ laser in a manner that is not consistent with the applicable license agreement. In addition, the licensor claims that it has not been provided with copies of invoices and other documentation relating to such sales, to which it asserts it is entitled under the license agreement. The Company disputes these and related allegations and believes that it is in compliance with all of its obligations under the license agreement. The Company is currently in discussions with the licensor in order to resolve these disagreements. The parties have reached an agreement in principle that an independent auditor should be appointed to review the calculations made by the Company in connection with the royalties it has paid in the past. Management believes that it will achieve a resolution of this matter that will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET PRICE FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market and also on the Prime Standard Segment of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, under the symbol RSTI and international securities identification number (ISIN) US7750431022, respectively. The table below sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of the Company’s common stock for each quarter ended during the last two fiscal years as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.:

	Common Stock Trade Prices
Quarter ended	High		Low
December 31, 2004	$	42.57	$	29.22
March 31, 2005	$	42.12	$	31.60
June 30, 2005	$	33.22	$	29.24
September 30, 2005	$	38.42	$	32.29
December 31, 2005	$	45.85	$	34.00
March 31, 2006	$	54.24	$	42.49
June 30, 2006	$	63.34	$	49.31
September 30, 2006	$	60.77	$	50.26

At December 6, 2006, the Company had 12 holders of record of its common stock and 15,419,500 shares outstanding. A significantly greater number of holders of the Company’s common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held of record by bankers, brokers and other financial institutions. The Company has not paid dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

23

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the five fiscal years ended September 30, 2006. The information sets forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto filed as part of this Annual Report.

	Year ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net sales	$	420,890		$	375,191		$	322,628		$	257,746		$	221,948
Cost of goods sold		242,619			222,189			190,473			161,465			143,128
Gross profit		178,271			153,002			132,155			96,281			78,820
Selling, general & administrative expenses		76,900			66,171			58,336			51,282			46,401
Research & development expenses		23,968			22,565			20,473			18,060			13,249
Amortization expense		3,532			5,270			2,389			1,654			3,762
Income from operations		73,871			58,996			50,957			25,285			15,408
Net interest expense (income)		(2.588	)		148			1,771			3,249			3,407
Income before income taxes		76,664			58,570			50,078			24,727			12,385
Income tax expense		27,041			20,595			17,648			9,422			7,384
Net income		49,623			37,975			32,430			15,305			5,001
Earnings per common share – Basic	$	3.25		$	2.52		$	2.41		$	1.31		$	0.43
Earnings per common share – Diluted	$	3.16		$	2.44		$	2.31		$	1.29		$	0.43
Shares used in computing earnings per share – Basic		15,284			15,072			13,479			11,640			11,552
Shares used in computing earnings per share – Diluted		15,687			15,561			14,020			11,863			11,592
OPERATING DATA (as percentage of sales):
Gross profit		42.4	%		41.0	%		41.0	%		37.4	%		35.5	%
Selling, general & administrative expenses		18.3	%		17.6	%		18.1	%		19.9	%		20.9	%
Research & development expenses		5.7	%		6.0	%		6.4	%		7.0	%		6.0	%
Income from operations		17.6	%		15.7	%		15.8	%		9.8	%		6.9	%
Income before income taxes		18.4	%		15.8	%		15.5	%		9.6	%		5.6	%
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital	$	282,659		$	222,002		$	163,540		$	98,759		$	81,661
Total assets		501,521			428,638			413,806			291,486			240,815
Line of credit and loans		35,416			41,002			54,802			68,833			63,135
Stockholders’ equity		358,440			294,166			257,384			140,586			108,418

24

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. is a leader in the design, development, engineering, manufacture, and marketing of laser-based products, primarily used for cutting, welding, and marking a wide range of materials.

During fiscal year 2006, 49% of revenues related to sales for macro applications and approximately 51% related to sales of laser products for marking and micro applications.

On February 28, 2004, the Company acquired 90% of the share capital of Optoskand AB, Gothenburg (Sweden) through its wholly-owned subsidiary RSL. The Company has a call option exercisable, beginning in 2009, for the remaining 10% of the common stock for a fixed price of Euro 0.1 million. Accordingly, the Company’s financial statements present Optoskand as if it was 100% owned.

On March 29, 2004, the Company issued and sold 2.5 million common shares in an underwritten public offering at a price of $28.00 per share. The underwriters exercised their over-allotment option on April 8, 2004, resulting in 360,000 additional common shares being issued and sold. The Company realized net proceeds of $75.3 million as a result of these transactions.

On August 20, 2004, the Company acquired an additional 15% of the share capital of Dilas Diodenlaser GmbH, Mainz (Germany) through its wholly-owned subsidiary RSTE. The Company currently holds 95% of the share capital.

On August 31, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of PRC Laser Corporation based in Landing, New Jersey (and its wholly-owned European subsidiary PRC Laser Europe N.V., Oudenaarde, Belgium), and Lee Laser, Inc. based in Orlando, Florida, from Dover Industries, Inc. PRC manufactures high power, fast-axial flow CO₂ lasers and Lee Laser produces solid-state lasers for material processing.

Effective October 22, 2004, the Company purchased the remaining 17% share capital of Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L. through RSTE under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholder.

Effective December 9, 2004, the Company purchased an additional 5% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. through RSTE under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholders. The Company held 76% of the share capital as a result of this purchase.

In July 2005, the Company formed a new Chinese subsidiary, Rofin-Baasel China Co., Ltd. as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary RSL.

Effective October 1, 2005, the Company formed DILAS Diode Laser Inc. in Tucson, Arizona as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Rofin-Sinar Inc.

Effective December 2, 2005, the Company purchased an additional 4% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. through Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L. under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholders. The Company currently holds 80% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. This purchase resulted in goodwill of $0.5 million.

On March 23, 2006, the Company acquired 40% of the share capital of H2B Photonics GmbH, Garbsen (Germany) through its wholly owned subsidiary Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG. H2B Photonics GmbH specializes in the development, manufacturing and sales of laser-based systems used to cut brittle materials, such as glass, to produce perfectly cut edges.

Effective May 1, 2006, the Company formed Rofin-Baasel Canada Ltd. in, Mississauga, Canada as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Rofin-Sinar Inc.

25

Outlook

Management believes that near-term growth in the laser macro business depends on the general investment cycle for capital goods. In the marking and micro business, near-term, management sees continuing demand especially from the electronics and medical device industry. In addition, we will further broaden our presence in Asia. The Company believes that its broad product portfolio and its diversified customer base should help a worsening of business conditions in single industrial or geographical markets in future.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the percentage of net sales represented by the respective line items in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:

	Fiscal Year ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold	57.6	%	59.2	%	59.0	%
Gross profit	42.4	%	40.8	%	41.0	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	18.3	%	17.6	%	18.1	%
Research & development expenses	5.7	%	6.1	%	6.4	%
Intangibles amortization	0.8	%	1.4	%	0.7	%
Income from operations	17.6	%	15.7	%	15.8	%
Income before income taxes	18.2	%	15.6	%	15.5	%
Net income	11.8	%	10.1	%	10.0	%

Fiscal Year 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year 2005

Net Sales – Net sales of $420.9 million represents an increase of $45.7 million, or 12%, over the prior year. Net sales increased $27.8 million, or 10%, in Europe/Asia and increased $17.9 million, or 17%, in the United States, as compared to the prior year. The U.S. dollar fluctuated against foreign currencies, which had an unfavorable effect on net sales of $8.8 million. Net sales of laser products for macro applications increased by 6% to $113.4 million, primarily due to the higher demand for our lower and higher power CO₂ lasers from the OEM machine tool industry. Net sales of lasers for marking and micro applications increased by 17% to $158.5 million compared to fiscal year 2005, mainly due to the higher demand for our lasers for micro and marking applications principally to the semiconductor, electronics and medical instruments industries. The overall net sales increase was also supported by a strong spare parts, service, and component business which increased by 12% to $149.0 million in fiscal year 2006.

Gross Profit – The Company’s gross profit of $178.3 million increased by $25.3 million, or 17%, over the prior year. As a percentage of sales, gross profit increased from 41% in fiscal year 2005 to 42% in fiscal year 2006. The percentage margin in fiscal year 2006 was primarily a result of a favorable product mix across all product lines, and the higher production efficiencies gained with the record high production volume. Gross profit was unfavorably affected by $3.1 million in fiscal year 2006 due to the fluctuation of the U.S. dollar.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses – Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $10.7 million, or 16%, to $76.9 million, compared to fiscal year 2005 primarily as a result of our increased selling and marketing activities, including our new formed subsidiaries in China, the U.S., and Canada, and higher commissions related to our record high revenues. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses were impacted by the first-time implementation of SFAS 123R, which resulted in $3.3 million stock-based compensation expenses. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses remained at 18%. Selling, general and administrative expenses were favorably affected by $1.5 million in fiscal year 2006 due to the fluctuation of the U.S. dollar.

26

Research and Development – The Company’s net expenses for research and development amounted to $24.0 million, which represents an increase of $1.4 million, or 6%, over fiscal year 2005 primarily due to ongoing research and development work mainly in the area of diode pumped, solid-state lasers, and CO₂ lasers. Gross research and development expenses for fiscal years 2006 and 2005, were $25.2 million and $23.5 million, respectively, and were reduced by $1.2 million and $0.9 million of government grants during the respective periods. The Company will continue to apply for, and expects to continue receiving, government grants towards research and development, especially in Europe. Research and development expenses were favorably affected by $0.7 million in fiscal year 2006 due to the fluctuation of the U.S. dollar.

Other Income - Net other income of $3.7 million fiscal year 2006 represents an increase of $3.6 million compared to the corresponding period in the prior year. Due to our continued cash generation, the low interest rate on outstanding debts, and higher interest rates on short-term investments, we were able to achieve net interest income of $2.6 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to net interest expenses of $0.1 million in fiscal 2005. The remaining increase in other income is mainly due to $0.3 million of foreign currency gains in fiscal 2006 compared to $0.3 million of foreign currency losses in fiscal 2005.

Income Tax Expense – Income tax expense of $27.0 million in fiscal year 2006 and $20.6 million in fiscal year 2005, represent effective tax rates of 35.3 % and 35.2% for the respective periods. The effective tax rate in both years is the result of higher income in countries with lower statutory income tax rates, tax exempt interest income in the U.S. and reductions in the valuation allowance on net operating loss carryforwards.

Net Income – As a result of the foregoing factors, the Company’s net income of $49.6 million ($3.16 per diluted share, based on 15.7 million weighted average common shares outstanding) in fiscal year 2006 increased by $11.6 million over the prior year’s net income of $38.0 million ($2.44 per diluted share, based on 15.6 million weighted average common shares outstanding). The implementation of SFAS 123R had an effect of reducing net income by $3.0 million. Currency translation decreased net income by $0.2 million of fiscal year 2006 net income.

Fiscal Year 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year 2004

Net Sales – Net sales of $375.2 million represents an increase of $52.6 million, or 16%, over the prior year. Net sales increased $14.7 million, or 6%, in Europe/Asia and increased $37.9 million, or 54%, in the United States, as compared to the prior year. The U.S. dollar weakened against foreign currencies, which had a favorable effect on net sales of $11.4 million. Net sales of laser products for macro applications increased by 19% to $189.2 million, primarily due to the full-year impact of the consolidation of PRC Laser, with the remaining increase due to a shift in product mix to CO₂ lasers with higher output power. Net sales of lasers for marking and micro applications increased by 14% to $186.0 million compared to fiscal year 2004, mainly due to the contribution of Lee Laser and the strong demand for our micro products mainly in medical instrument applications. The overall net sales increase was also supported by a strong service, spare parts, and component business which increased by 26% to $131.3 million in fiscal year 2005.

Gross Profit – The Company’s gross profit of $153.0 million increased by $20.8 million, or 16%, over the prior year. As a percentage of sales, gross profit remained at 41%. The percentage margin in fiscal year 2005 was primarily a result of a favorable product mix. Gross profit was favorably affected by $3.6 million in fiscal year 2005 due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses – Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $7.9 million, or 14%, to $66.2 million, compared to fiscal year 2004 primarily due to a full year impact of the consolidation of PRC and Lee Laser and expenses associated with Section 404 certification required by the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses remained at 18%. Selling, general and administrative expenses were unfavorably affected by $2.1 million in fiscal year 2005 due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar.

27

Research and Development – The Company’s net expenses for research and development amounted to $22.6 million, which represents an increase of $2.1 million, or 10%, over fiscal year 2004 primarily due to ongoing research and development work mainly in the area of diode pumped, solid-state lasers, and CO₂ lasers. Gross research and development expenses for fiscal years 2005 and 2004, were $23.5 million and $21.6 million, respectively, and were reduced by $0.9 million and $1.1 million of government grants during the respective periods. The Company will continue to apply for, and expects to continue receiving, government grants towards research and development, especially in Europe. Research and development expenses were unfavorably affected by $0.9 million in fiscal year 2005 due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar.

Income Tax Expense – Income tax expense of $20.6 million in fiscal year 2005 and $17.6 million in fiscal year 2004, represent effective tax rates of 35.2% for both periods. The effective tax rate in both years is the result of higher income in countries with lower statutory income tax rates, tax exempt interest income in the U.S. and reductions in the valuation allowance on net operating loss carryforwards.

Net Income – As a result of the foregoing factors, the Company’s net income of $38.0 million ($2.44 per diluted share, based on 15.6 million weighted average common shares outstanding) in fiscal year 2005 increased by $5.5 million over the prior year’s net income of $32.4 million ($2.31 per diluted share, based on 14.0 million weighted average common shares outstanding). Currency translation decreased net income by $0.4 million, or 1%, of fiscal year 2005 net income.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity at September 30, 2006, were cash and cash equivalents of $75.4 million, short-term investments of $94.1 million, an annually renewable $25.0 million line of credit with Deutsche Bank AG, and several other lines of credit to support foreign subsidiaries in their local currencies in an aggregate amount of $78.0 million (translated at the applicable exchange rate at September 30, 2006). As of September 30, 2006, $8.5 million was outstanding under the Deutsche Bank facility and $26.9 million under other lines of credit. Therefore, $67.6 million is unused and available under Rofin’s lines of credit. The Company is subject to financial covenants under this facility and these lines of credit, which could restrict the Company from drawing money under them. At September 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $34.8 million during fiscal year 2006. Approximately $58.3 million in cash and cash equivalents were provided by operating activities, primarily as the result of increased net income and other non-cash items, principally depreciation and amortization. Operating cash flow was negatively affected by a increase in accounts receivables and in inventories, partially offset by an increase in accrued liabilities and in income taxes payable.

Uses of cash for investing activities totaled $22.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2006, and related primarily to the purchase of short-term investments ($15.4 million) and various additions to property and equipment in connection with the expansion of the Company’s operations ($6.4 million).

Net cash used by financing activities totaled $3.3 million and was primarily related to current period repayments of bank debt, net of borrowings of $7.0 million, offset by $3.7 million generated through issuance of new shares from the exercise of stock options.

The Company expects that its capital expenditures will be approximately $7.0 million in 2007.

Management believes that cash flows from operations, along with existing cash and cash equivalents and availability under our credit facilities and lines of credit, will provide adequate resources to meet the Company’s capital requirements and operational needs on both a current and a long-term basis.

28

The following table illustrates the Company’s contractual obligations as of September 30, 2006:

	Payments due by period (in thousands)
			Less than		1-3		3-5		More than
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
Long-term debt	$	18,089	$	—	$	18,089	$	—	$	—
Pension obligations		4,388		521		960		1,413		1,494
Operating lease obligations		15,734		5,885		6,988		2,159		702
Purchase obligations		77,798		55,820		21,978		—		—
Interest obligation		1,736		890		846		—		—
Other long-term liabilities		727		61		107		12		547
Total	$	118,472	$	63,177	$	48,968	$	3,584	$	2,743

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements or financing arrangements involving variable interest entities.

CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS

Although the Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars, approximately 61% of its net sales are denominated in other currencies, primarily Euro, Swedish krona, British pound, Singapore dollar, Taiwanese dollar, Korean won, Japanese yen, Canadian dollar, and Chinese RMB. Net sales and costs and related assets and liabilities are generally denominated in the functional currencies of the operations, thereby serving to reduce the Company’s exposure to exchange gains and losses.

Exchange differences upon translation from each operation’s functional currency to U.S. dollars are accumulated as a separate component of equity. The currency translation adjustment component of shareholders’ equity had the effect of increasing total equity by $16.4 million at September 30, 2006, as compared to $7.5 million at September 30, 2005.

The fluctuation of the Euro and the other relevant functional currencies against the U.S. dollar has had the effect of increasing or decreasing (as applicable) reported net sales, as well as cost of goods sold, gross margin, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research and development expenses, denominated in such foreign currencies when translated into U.S. dollars as compared to prior periods.

The following table illustrates the effect of the changes in exchange rates on the Company’s fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, net sales, gross profit, and income from operations:

	Fiscal Year 2006				Fiscal Year 2005				Fiscal Year 2004
	Actual		At 2005 Exchange Rates		Actual		At 2004 Exchange Rates		Actual		At 2003 Exchange Rates
	(in millions)
Net sales	$	420.9	$	429.7	$	375.2	$	363.8	$	322.6	$	296.3
Gross profit		178.3		181.4		153.0		149.4		132.2		124.4
Income from operations		73.9		74.8		59.0		58.4		51.0		50.0

Between fiscal year 2006 and 2005, the average exchange rate for the Euro weakened against the U.S. dollar by approximately 3.0%. The impact of this weakening was to decrease net sales and gross profit by $8.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively, because approximately 61% of sales are denominated in other currencies, primarily the Euro. This weakening of the Euro had the effect of decreasing operating expense by $2.2 million, thereby reducing income from operations only by $0.9 million.

29

Between fiscal year 2005 and 2004, the average exchange rate for the Euro strengthened against the U.S. dollar by approximately 2.3%. The impact of this strengthening was to increase net sales and gross profit by $11.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, because approximately 66% of sales are denominated in other currencies, primarily the Euro. However, because more than 66% of operating expenses are also denominated in these other currencies, this same strengthening of the Euro had the effect of increasing operating expenses and thereby reducing the overall exchange rate effect on income from operations by $0.6 million.

Between fiscal year 2004 and 2003, the average exchange rate for the Euro strengthened against the U.S. dollar by approximately 11%. The impact of this strengthening was to increase net sales and gross profit by $26.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively, because approximately 71% of sales are denominated in other currencies, primarily the Euro. However, because approximately 82% of operating expenses are also denominated in these other currencies, this same strengthening of the Euro had the effect of increasing operating expenses, thereby reducing the overall exchange rate effect on income from operations by $1.0 million.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements. Certain of the accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company records allowances for uncollectible customer accounts receivable based on historical experience. Additionally, an allowance is made based on an assessment of specific customers’ financial condition and liquidity. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required. No individual customer represents more than 10% of total accounts receivable. Any increase in allowance will impact operating income during a given period.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, after provisions for excess and obsolete inventory salable at prices below cost. Provisions for slow moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on current assessments about historical experience and future product demand and production requirements for the next twelve months. These factors are impacted by market conditions, technology changes, and changes in strategic direction, and require estimates and management judgment that may include elements that are uncertain. The Company evaluates the adequacy of these provisions quarterly. Although the Company strives to achieve a balance between market demands and risk of inventory excess or obsolescence, it is possible that, should conditions change, additional provisions may be needed. Any changes in provisions will impact operating income during a given period.

Warranty Reserves

The Company provides reserves for the estimated costs of product warranties when revenue is recognized. The Company relies upon historical experience, expectation of future conditions, and its service data to estimate its warranty reserve. The Company continuously monitors these data to ensure that the reserve is sufficient. Warranty expense has historically been within our expectations. To the extent we experience increased warranty claim activity or increased costs associated with servicing those claims (such costs may include material, labor, and travel costs), revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required. Increases in reserves will impact operating income during the period.

30

Pension Obligations

The determination of the Company’s obligation and expense for pension is dependent on the selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating those amounts. Assumptions are made about interest rates, expected investment return on plan assets, total turnover rates, and rates of future compensation increases. In addition, the Company’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal rates and mortality rates to develop their calculations of these amounts. The Company generally reviews these assumptions at the beginning of each fiscal year. The Company is required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in making these assumptions. The actuarial assumptions that the Company uses may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact on the amount of pension benefits expense the Company has recorded or may record.

The discount rate enables the Company to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. The Company has little latitude in selecting this rate and it must represent the market rate of high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense.

To determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets.

Share-Based Payment

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite vesting period. We make judgments about the fair value of the awards, including the expected term of the award, volatility of the underlying stock and estimated forfeitures, which impact the amount of compensation expense recognized in the financial statements. Such amounts may change as a result of additional grants, forfeitures, modifications in assumptions and other factors. SFAS No. 123R provides that income tax effects of share-based payments are recognized in the financial statements for those awards which will normally result in tax deductions under existing tax law. Under current U.S. federal tax laws, we receive a compensation expense deduction related to stock options only when those options are exercised and vested shares are received. Accordingly, the financial statement recognition of compensation cost for stock options creates a deductible temporary difference which results in a deferred tax asset and a corresponding deferred tax benefit in the income statement for all U.S. based employees. Stock compensation expense related to non-U.S. employees is treated as a permanent difference for income tax purposes.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48 and in subsequent periods. FIN 48 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 (our fiscal year 2008) and the provisions of FIN 48 will be applied to all tax positions under Statement No. 109 upon initial adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this interpretation will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for that fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 addresses the process and diversity in practice of quantifying financial statement misstatements resulting in the potential build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. We will be required to adopt the provisions of SAB No.108 in fiscal 2007. We currently do not believe that the adoption of SAB No. 108 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

31

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this Statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not believe that the adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 will materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No.87, 88, 106, and 132®, (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity or changes in unrestricted net assets of a not-for-profit organization. The provisions of this Statement are effective for an employer with publicly traded equity securities and are required to recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 158 on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following discussion about the Company’s market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

As of September 30, 2006, the Company maintained cash equivalents and short-term investments of $109.7 million, consisting mainly of non-taxable interest bearing securities and demand deposits all with maturities of less than three months. If short-term interest rates were to increase or decrease by 10%, the impact on interest income would be approximately $0.4 million.

As of September 30, 2006, the Company had $17.5 million of variable rate debt on which the interest rate is reset every six months, $2.8 million of variable rate debt on which the interest rate is set annually and $15.1 million of fixed rate debt. Maturities of this debt are as follows: $17.4 million is due in 2007, $14.9 million is due in 2008, and $3.2 million is due in 2009. A 10% change in the variable interest rates of the Company’s debt would result in an increase or decrease in interest expense of less than $0.1 million.

Additionally, the Company entered into interest swap agreements of total notional amount of Euro 13.0 million (equivalent to $16.5 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) to minimize the interest expenses on short and long-term debt by shifting from variable to fixed interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts and forward exchange options generally of less than one year duration to hedge a portion of its foreign currency risk on sales transactions. At September 30, 2006, the Company held Japanese yen forward exchange options with notional amounts of Euro 0.4 million and Japanese yen forward exchange options with notional amount of $0.2 million. The gains or losses resulting from a 10% change in currency exchange rates would be less than $0.1 million.

ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Item 14(a) for an index to the consolidated financial statements. No supplementary financial information is required to be presented pursuant to Item 302(a) of Regulation S-K.

32

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K are certifications of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). This “Controls and Procedures” section includes information concerning the controls and controls evaluation referred to in the certifications. Part III, Item 15 of this Form 10-K sets forth the report of KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding its audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting set forth below in this section. This section should be read in conjunction with the certifications and the KPMG report for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Such disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that all information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods set forth in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission forms, rules and regulations. In addition, Rofin has reviewed its internal control over financial reporting and has concluded that there has been no change in such internal control during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records, that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, the end of its fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included evaluation of such elements as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and the Company’s overall control environment. This assessment is supported by testing and monitoring performed by the Company’s Internal Audit organization.

Based on its assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the fiscal year to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

33

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, audited management’s assessment and independently assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP has issued an attestation report concurring with management’s assessment, which is included at the beginning of Part III, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is included in the “Election of Directors”, “Directors and Executive Officers”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, and “Committees of the Board of Directors; Meetings and Compensation of Directors”, sections of the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in March 2007, and is incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is included in the “Executive Compensation and Related Information” section of the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in March 2007, and is incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is included in the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Management” sections of the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in March 2007, and is incorporated by reference herein.

The following table sets forth the number of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at September 30, 2006:

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
Equity Incentive Plan		1,317,700		29 ¾		7,250
Total equity compensation plans approved by security holders		1,317,700		29 ¾		7,250
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		1,317,700		29 ¾		7,250

The remaining information called for by this item 12 relating to Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans is incorporated by reference to note 15 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included at Part III, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

34

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is included in the “Compensation Committee”, “Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Transactions” sections of the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in March 2007, and is incorporated by reference herein.

The Company had sales to its minority shareholder in Japan amounting to $1.8 million, $1.1 million, and $1.8 million in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and to its minority shareholder in Sweden amounting to $0.3 million in fiscal year 2006. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the accounts receivable with the minority shareholder in Japan amounted to $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

RSL paid commissions to its minority shareholder of Rofin-Baasel China of $0.3 million in fiscal 2006. No balances were outstanding as of September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2005 the company had accounts receivables of $0.2 from this minority shareholder.

The Company’s sales to related parties have generally been on terms comparable to those available in connection with sales to unaffiliated parties.

The main facility in Starnberg (Germany) is rented under a 25-year operating lease from the former minority shareholder of CBL Mr. Baasel, who is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and includes a clause to terminate the lease contract within a two-year notice period during the contract. The Company paid rent expense of $0.6 million to Mr. Baasel during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

The Company has accrued $0.1 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, for the option to purchase the remaining minority interests in Optoskand AB and $0.1 million were accrued for accumulated interests on this obligation. These amounts are included in accounts payable to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

The Company believes that all transactions noted above, have been executed on an arms-length basis. Except for the foregoing, no director, officer, nominee director, 5% holder of the Company’s shares, or immediate family member, associate or affiliate thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the beginning of fiscal year 2003 or has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any proposed transaction, having a value of $60,000 or more.

Indebtedness of Officers and Directors

Since the beginning of fiscal year 2004, there has been no indebtedness to the Company by any director or officer or associates of any such person, other than reimbursements for purchases, for ordinary travel and expense advances and for other transactions in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information set forth under “Independent Public Accountants - All Other Fees” in the definitive form of the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in March 2007, is incorporated by reference herein.

35

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

a.	1.	Consolidated Financial Statements
		The following financial statements are filed as part of this 10-K:
		Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006, and 2005	F-3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004	F-4
		Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004	F-5
		Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004	F-6
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7
	2.	Financial Statement Schedules
		Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	F-27
		Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the matter or conditions are not present or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements hereto.
	3.	Exhibits
		The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report.

36

EXHIBIT NUMBER	DESCRIPTION
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and Form of Certificate of Amendment thereto (*)
3.2	By-Laws of the Company (**)
4.1	Form of Rights Agreement (*)
10.1	Form of Sale and Transfer Agreement between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (*)
10.2	Form of Sale and Transfer Agreement by and among Siemens Power Corporation and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (*)
10.3	Form of Tax Allocation and Indemnification Agreement among Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc., Rofin-Sinar, Inc., Siemens Corporation, and Siemens Power Corporation (*)
10.4	Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of May 27, 1992, by and among Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, Marubeni Corporation and Nippei Toyama Corporation (*)
10.5	Cooperation Agreement, dated as of May 27, 1992, among Nippei Toyama Corporation, Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, and Marubeni Corporation (*)
10.6	Cooperation Agreement, dated as of May 27, 1992, among Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, Marubeni Corporation, and Nippei Toyama Corporation (*)
10.7	Inheritable Building Right (Erbbaurecht), dated as of March 1, 1990, between Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH and Lohss GmbH (in German, English summary provided) (*)
10.8	Lease Agreement, dated August 10, 1990, between Josef and Maria Kranz and Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH (in German, English summary provided) (*)
10.9	Lease Agreement, dated June 14, 1989, between DR Group and Rofin-Sinar, Incorporated (Mast Street property) (*)
10.10	Lease Agreement, dated March 25, 1993, between DR Group and Rofin-Sinar, Incorporated (Plymouth Oaks Drive property) (*)
10.11	Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH Pension Plan (in German, English summary provided) (*)
10.12	Form of 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (*)
10.13	Form of 1996 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan (*)
10.14	Deutsche Bank AG Commitment Letter dated August 22, 1996 (*)
10.15	Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of September 2, 1996, among Peter Wirth, Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (in German, English summary provided) (*)
10.16	Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of September 2, 1996, among Hinrich Martinen, Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (in German, English summary provided) (*)
10.17	Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of September 2, 1996, among Günther Braun, Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH, and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (in German, English summary

37

EXHIBIT NUMBER		DESCRIPTION
		provided) (*)
10.18		English Translation of Acquisition Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2000, by and between Mannesmann Demag Krauss-Maffei AG and Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH (****)
10.19		English Translation of Option Agreement between Carl Baasel and Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH (***)
10.20		Lease Agreement between Carl Baasel and Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH (***)
10.21		2002 Equity Incentive Plan (*****)
14.1		Code of Business Ethics (******)
21.1		List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(*)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-09539) which was declared effective on September 25, 1996.
(**)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31, 1998.
(***)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2000.
(****)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2001.
(*****)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2003.
(******)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2004.

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	December 12, 2006	ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
		By: /s/ Günther Braun
		Günther Braun
		President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE		TITLE	DATE
/s/	Peter Wirth	Chairman of the Board	December 12, 2006
	Peter Wirth
/s/	Günther Braun	President, Chief Executive Officer,	December 12, 2006
		and Director
	Günther Braun
/s/	Ingrid Mittelstaedt	Chief Financial Officer	December 12, 2006
	Ingrid Mittelstaedt
/s/	Ralph Reins	Director	December 12, 2006
	Ralph Reins
/s/	Gary Willis	Director	December 12, 2006
	Gary Willis
/s/	Carl F. Baasel	Director	December 12, 2006
	Carl F. Baasel
/s/	Daniel Smoke	Director	December 12, 2006
	Daniel Smoke
/s/	Stephen Fantone	Director	December 12, 2006
	Stephen Fantone

39

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited financial statement schedule, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated December 12, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

As discussed in note 1, for the year ended September 30, 2006, the Company adopted the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R Share-Based Payment, on October 1, 2005.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Detroit, Michigan
December 12, 2006

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A), that Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 based on the COSO criteria. 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, and our report dated December 12, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R. Share-Based Payment, on October 1, 2005.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Detroit, Michigan
December 12, 2006

F-2

ROFIN-SINAR TECH

NOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except share data)

	September 30,
	2006			2005
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	75,395		$	40,602
Short-term investments		94,100			78,675
Accounts receivable, trade		87,909			79,921
Less allowance for doubtful accounts		(2,656	)		(2,398	)
Trade accounts receivable, net		85,253			77,523
Accounts receivable from related party (note 12)		1,157			1,110
Other accounts receivable		2,667			1,691
Inventories (note 2)		116,965			107,105
Prepaid expenses		2,045			1,806
Deferred income tax assets (note 9)		9,974			8,003
Total current assets		387,556			316,515
Property and equipment, at cost (note 3)		77,903			70,911
Less accumulated depreciation		(41,649	)		(36,690	)
Property and equipment, net		36,254			34,221
Deferred income tax assets (note 9)		1,818			2,949
Goodwill, net (note 4)		64,616			61,493
Intangibles, net (note 4)		10,221			13,158
Other assets		1,056			302
Total assets	$	501,521		$	428,638
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Line of credit and short-term borrowings (notes 6)	$	17,327		$	20,152
Accounts payable, trade		15,702			14,702
Accounts payable to related party (note 12)		303			230
Income taxes payable (note 9)		15,475			9,943
Deferred income tax liabilities (note 9)		874			3,336
Accrued liabilities (note 5)		55,216			46,149
Total current liabilities		104,897			94,512
Long-term debt (note 7)		18,089			20,850
Pension obligations (note 10)		11,295			11,126
Deferred income tax liabilities (note 9)		5,347			5,339
Minority interests		2,787			2,072
Other long-term liabilities		666			573
Total liabilities		143,081			134,472
Commitments (note 8)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 15,372,200 (15,122,650 at September 30, 2005) shares issued and outstanding		154			151
Additional paid-in capital		167,446			162,550
Retained earnings		174,694			125,071
Accumulated other comprehensive income		16,146			6,394
Total stockholders’ equity		358,440			294,166
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	501,521		$	428,638

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005, AND 2004
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Net sales	$	420,890		$	375,191		$	322,628
Cost of goods sold		242,619			222,189			190,473
Gross profit		178,271			153,002			132,155
Selling, general and administrative expenses		76,900			66,171			58,336
Research and development expenses		23,968			22,565			20,473
Amortization expense		3,532			5,270			2,389
Income from operations		73,871			58,996			50,957
Other expense (income):
Interest, net		(2,588	)		148			1,771
Minority interest		890			554			708
Foreign currency losses (gains)		(344	)		351			(1,148	)
Miscellaneous		(751	)		(627	)		(452	)
Total other expense (income), net		(2,793	)		426			879
Income before income taxes		76,664			58,570			50,078
Income tax expense (note 9)		27,041			20,595			17,648
Net income	$	49,623		$	37,975		$	32,430
Earnings per share (note 11):
Basic	$	3.25		$	2.52		$	2.41
Diluted	$	3.16		$	2.44		$	2.31
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per share (note 11):
Basic		15,283,817			15,071,692			13,478,606
Diluted		15,686,892			15,561,006			14,020,154

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005, AND 2004
(dollars in thousands)

									Accumulated
	Number of		Common		Additional				Other			Total
	Common Shares		Stock		Paid-in		Retained		Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	Outstanding		Par Value		Capital		Earnings		Income (loss)			Equity
BALANCES at September 30, 2003		11,908,600	$	119	$	79,918	$	54,666	$	5,883		$	140,586
Comprehensive income:
Fair value of interest swap agreement				—		—		—		606			606
Foreign currency translation adjustment				—		—		—		4,873			4,873
Net income				—		—		32,430		—			32,430
Total comprehensive income													37,909
Common stock issued in connection with:
Secondary stock offering		2,860,000		29		75,236		—		—			75,265
Stock incentive plans		161,950		1		3,623		—		—			3,624
BALANCES at September 30, 2004		14,930,550	$	149	$	158,777	$	87,096	$	11,362		$	257,384
Comprehensive income:
Fair value of interest swap agreement				—		—		—		302			302
Minimum pension liability				—		—		—		(1,186	)		(1,186	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment				—		—		—		(4,084	)		(4,084	)
Net income				—		—		37,975		—			37,975
Total comprehensive income													33,007
Common stock issued in connection with:
Stock incentive plans		192,100		2		3,773		—		—			3,775
BALANCES at September 30, 2005		15,122,650	$	151	$	162,550	$	125,071	$	6,394		$	294,166
Comprehensive income:
Fair value of interest swap agreement				—		—		—		204			204
Minimum pension liability				—		—		—		707			707
Foreign currency translation adjustment				—		—		—		8,841			8,841
Net income				—		—		49,623		—			49,623
Total comprehensive income													59,375
Common stock issued in connection with:
Stock incentive plans (net of taxes of $2,418)		249,550		3		4,896		—		—			4,899
BALANCES at September 30, 2006		15,372,200	$	154	$	167,446	$	174,694	$	16,146		$	358,440

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-5

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
(dollars in thousands)

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	49,623		$	37,975		$	32,430
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		9,076			10,451			6,730
Issuance of restricted stock		284			176			146
Provision for doubtful accounts		642			(29	)		230
Exchange rate gains		(22	)		(172	)		(864	)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		47			86			280
Stock-based compensation expenses		3,320			—			—
Deferred income taxes		(4,080	)		(3,655	)		(559	)
Increase in minority interest		890			595			708
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, trade		(5,437	)		1,542			3,498
Other accounts receivable		(887	)		(114	)		(540	)
Inventories		(5,313	)		(2,540	)		(3,756	)
Prepaid expenses and other		(571	)		(890	)		(405	)
Accounts payable		403			(4,872	)		(7,819	)
Income taxes payable		2,403			2,350			3,265
Accrued liabilities and pension obligations		7,909			(2,823	)		5,538
Net cash provided by operating activities		58,287			38,080			38,882
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property and equipment		(6,396	)		(6,314	)		(4,469	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		262			289			132
Purchases of short-term investments, net		(15,425	)		(16,625	)		(58,050	)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired		(1,249	)		(1,181	)		(34,960	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(22,808	)		(23,831	)		(97,347	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings from bank		16,095			41,137			8,792
Repayments to bank		(23,140	)		(53,931	)		(28,477	)
Payment to subsidiary’s minority shareholders		—			—			(715	)
Issuance of additional shares		—			—			75,265
Issuance of common stock		3,712			2,178			1,685
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(3,333	)		(10,616	)		56,550
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash		2,647			(1,247	)		(356	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		34,793			2,386			(2,271	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		40,602			38,216			40,487
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	75,395		$	40,602		$	38,216
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	1,770		$	1,886		$	2,966
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	$	28,087		$	22,171		$	11,883

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-6

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Description of the Company and Business

The primary business of Rofin is to develop, manufacture, and market industrial lasers and supplies used for material processing applications. The majority of the Company’s customers are in the machine tool, automotive and semiconductor and electronics industries and are located in the United States, Europe, and Asia. For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004 Rofin generated approximately 65% of its revenues from the sale of lasers and laser systems and approximately 35% from aftermarket support for the Company’s existing laser products and from its components business.

The accompanying financial statements present the historical financial information of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (“Rofin” or “RSTI” or “the Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Rofin consists of Rofin-Sinar, Inc. (“RS Inc.”), PRC Laser Corp. (“PRC”), Lee Laser, Inc. (“Lee”), Rofin-Baasel Canada Ltd., Dilas Diodelaser Inc. and Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L. (“RSTE”). RSTE, a European holding company formed in 1999, owns 100% of Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH (“RSL”), 95% of Dilas Diodenlaser GmbH (“Dilas”), 100% of Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l., 100% of Rofin-Baasel France S.A., 80% of Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel UK Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Benelux B.V., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Singapore Pte. Ltd., 100% of Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L. (“RBE”), 100% of Rofin-Baasel Taiwan Ltd., and 100% of Rofin-Baasel Korea Co., Ltd.. 

The financial statements of PRC include the consolidated accounts of PRC Laser Europe N.V., Belgium.

RSL includes the consolidated accounts of its 88%-owned subsidiary Rofin-Baasel Japan Corp. (a Japanese corporation), its 100%-owned subsidiaries Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH (“Rasant”), and CBL Verwaltungsgesellschaft GmbH, its 90%-owned subsidiary Optoskand AB (“Optoskand”), its 100%-owned subsidiary Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG. (“CBL”), and its 80%-owned subsidiary Rofin-Baasel China Co., Ltd. (formed in July 2005).

CBL includes the consolidated accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries Rofin-Baasel, Inc. (“RB Inc”), Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Geraete GmbH, and PMB Elektronik GmbH, as well as its 40% equity investment in H2B Photonics GmbH.

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

On March 29, 2004, the Company issued and sold 2.5 million common shares in an underwritten public offering at a price of $28.00 per share. The underwriters exercised their over-allotment option on April 8, 2004 resulting in 360,000 additional common shares being issued and sold. The Company realized net proceeds of $75,265 as a result of these transactions.

(b) Acquisitions and Formation of New Entities

The Company uses the purchase method of accounting for its acquisitions with the respective results of operations included in the consolidated results from the date of acquisition.

• On February 28, 2004, the Company acquired 90% of the share capital of Optoskand AB, Gothenburg (Sweden) through its wholly-owned subsidiary RSL. The Company has a call option exercisable beginning in 2009 for the remaining 10% of the common stock for a fixed price of approximately $0.1 million. The accompanying financial statements present Optoskand as if it was 100% owned.

• On August 20, 2004, the Company acquired an additional 15% of the share capital of Dilas Diodenlaser GmbH, Mainz (Germany) through its wholly-owned subsidiary RSTE. The Company currently holds 95% of the share capital.

F-7

	•	On August 31, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the share capital of PRC Laser Corporation based in Landing, New Jersey (including its wholly-owned European subsidiary PRC Laser Europe N.V., Oudenaarde, Belgium) and Lee Laser, Inc. based in Orlando, Florida. This acquisition further strengthened the Company’s position in the North American market for industrial lasers and increased the Company’s customer base in North America and Asia.
	•	Effective December 9, 2004, the Company purchased an additional 5% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. through Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L. under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholders. The Company then held 76% of the share capital as a result of this purchase. This purchase resulted in goodwill of $0.6 million.
	•	Effective October 1, 2005, the Company formed DILAS Diode Laser Inc. in Tucson, Arizona as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Rofin-Sinar Inc.
	•	Effective December 2, 2005, the Company purchased an additional 4% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. through Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L. under an option agreement between the Company and the former minority shareholders. The Company currently holds 80% of the share capital of Rofin-Sinar U.K. Ltd. This purchase resulted in goodwill of $0.5 million.
	•	Effective May 1, 2006, the Company formed Rofin-Baasel Canada Ltd. in, Mississauga, Canada as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Rofin-Sinar Inc.
The Company uses the equity method of accounting for the following acquisition.
	•	On March 23, 2006, the Company acquired 40% of the share capital of H2B Photonics GmbH, Garbsen (Germany) through its wholly owned subsidiary Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG. H2B Photonics GmbH specializes in the development, manufacturing and sales of laser-based systems used to cut brittle materials, such as glass, to produce perfectly cut edges.

The following unaudited pro-forma financial information for the PRC and Lee Laser acquisition reflects the consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had taken place on October 1, 2003.

	2004
Net sales	$	357,541
Net income	$	33,016
Earnings per average weighted share - Basic		2.45
Earnings per average weighted share - Diluted		2.35

(c) Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments

Cash equivalents consist of financial instruments that are readily convertible into cash and have original maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition.

Short-term investments include auction rate securities. Auction rate securities are variable rate securities tied to short-term interest rates with maturities on the face of the securities in excess of 90 days. Auction rate securities have rate resets through a modified Dutch auction, at predetermined short-term intervals, usually every 7, 28, 35, or 49 days. The securities trade at par and are callable at par on any payment date at the option of the issuer. Investment earnings paid during a given period are based upon the reset rate determined during the prior auction.

Although these securities are issued and rated as long-term securities, they are priced and traded as short-term instruments because of the liquidity provided through the interest rate reset.

“Purchases of short-term investments, net”, included in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows, have been included to reflect the purchases and sales of auction rate securities during the years presented.

F-8

Interest income on cash equivalents and short-term investments was $3,998, $2,126 and $1,108 for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and was offset by interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

(d) Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, after provisions for excess and obsolete inventory salable at prices below cost. Costs are determined using the first in, first out and weighted average cost methods.

The Company writes down inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

(e) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, except for leasehold improvements, which are amortized over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the term of the lease. The methods of depreciation are straight line for financial reporting purposes and accelerated for income tax purposes. Depreciable lives for financial reporting purposes are as follows:

	Useful Lives
Buildings	40 Years
Technical machinery and equipment	3-10 Years
Furniture and fixtures	3-10 Years
Computers and software	3-4 Years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of term of lease or 15 Years

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

(f) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisitions.

Goodwill is required to be tested on an annual basis for potential impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is defined as the lowest level of an entity that is a business and that can be distinguished, physically and operationally and for internal reporting purposes, from other activities, operations, and assets of the entity. A reporting unit can be no higher than a reportable operating segment and would generally be lower than that level of reporting. The Company identified three reporting units: the German reporting unit; the North America reporting unit; and the reporting unit for the rest of the world.

In testing for impairment, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount. If the carrying value is below the fair value assessment, there will be no impairment loss. If the fair value is below the carrying value, then the Company is required to perform an additional test to determine the impaired fair value of the goodwill and its carrying amount.

The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment testing as of October 1^st and determined that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying value and accordingly, the second step of the impairment test was not required to be performed.

F-9

(g) Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable Valuation

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. Terms under these arrangements are generally free on board (“FOB”) shipping point, or (“EXW”) ex works factory, at which time legal title passes from the Company to the customer. Therefore, delivery is generally considered to have occurred upon shipment. In certain circumstances customers may negotiate different terms. In these situations, delivery is considered to have occurred once legal title has passed from the Company to the customer. This may be at delivery to the customer’s destination or acceptance by the Company’s customer. The Company’s products typically include a one-year warranty and the estimated cost of product warranty claims is accrued at the time the sale is recognized, based on historical experience.

Sales to end-user customers and resellers typically do not have customer acceptance provisions and only certain of the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customer sales have customer acceptance provisions. Customer acceptance is generally limited to performance under published product specifications. For the few product sales that have customer acceptance provisions because of higher than published specifications, (1) the products are tested and accepted by the customer at a Company site or by the customer’s acceptance of the results of a testing program prior to shipment to the customer, or (2) the revenue is deferred until customer acceptance occurs.

The vast majority of our sales are made to OEMs, resellers and end-users in the industrial market. Sales made to OEMs and resellers in the industrial market do not require installation of the products by the Company, as installation is performed by the customer and are not subject to other post-delivery obligations. For end-users, where the Company has agreed to perform installation or provide training, the Company defers revenue related to installation services until installation is completed. The Company defers revenue on training services until these services are provided.

The Company records allowances for uncollectible customer accounts receivable based on historical experience. Additionally, an allowance is made based on an assessment of specific customers’ financial condition and liquidity. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required.

(h) Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss tax carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

(i) Accounting for Warranties

The Company issues a standard warranty of one year for parts and labor on lasers that are sold. Additionally, extended warranties are negotiated on a contract-by-contract basis. The Company provides for estimated warranty costs as products are shipped.

The Company’s estimate of costs to fulfill its warranty obligations is based on historical experience and expectation of future conditions. To the extent the Company experiences increased warranty claim activity or increased costs associated with servicing those claims, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

F-10

(j) Foreign Currency Translation

The assets and liabilities of the Company’s operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. Gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign currency financial statements are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in net income.

(k) Earnings per Share (EPS)

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution from common stock equivalents (stock options).

(l) Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability, and fair value of interest rate swap agreements, and is presented in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income. Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of the following:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	16,360		$	7,519
Minimum pension liability (net of tax effect of $300 in 2006 and $746 in 2005)		(479	)		(1,186	)
Fair value of interest swap agreements (net of tax effect of $154 in 2006 and $37 in 2005)		265			61
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	$	16,146		$	6,394

(m) Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed when incurred and are net of German government and European grants of $1,193, $895, and $1,056 received for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The Company has no future obligations under such grants.

(n) Financial Instruments

The fair value of financial instruments, consisting principally of cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and line of credits, approximate carrying value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The fair value of long-term debt approximates the carrying value due to the variable based interest on such debt. The fair values of interest rate swap agreements were estimated by discounting expected cash flows using market interest rates over the remaining term of the instrument.

(o) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage funding costs and exposures arising from fluctuations in interest rates. These derivative financial instruments consist primarily of interest rate swaps. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activity, an Amendment of SFAS 133” require that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at their respective fair values and that changes in the derivative instruments’ fair value be recognized in earnings. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to a recognized liability (“cash flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item.

F-11

Interest rate swap agreements designated as hedges of the Company’s financial liabilities are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Adjustments to the fair value of the derivative asset or liability are recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive income.

From time to time, the Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts and forward exchange options generally of less than one year duration to hedge a portion of its sales transactions denominated in foreign currencies. At September 30, 2006, the Company held Japanese yen forward exchange options with notional amounts of Euro 0.4 million and Japanese yen forward exchange options with notional amount of $0.2 million.

The Company manages exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements.

(p) Operating Leases

The Company leases facilities under operating leases. Building lease agreements generally include rent escalation clauses.  Most of the Company’s lease agreements include renewal periods at the Company’s option. The Company recognizes scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the lease term beginning with the date the Company takes possession of the leased space.

(q) Use of Estimates

Management of the Company makes a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reporting of revenues and expenses, to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted U.S. accounting principles. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the valuation allowance for receivables, inventory valuation, warranty liabilities, and assets and obligations related to employee benefits. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

(r) Stock Incentive Plans

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, as a replacement to SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, which allowed companies to use the intrinsic method of valuing share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair-value method as defined in SFAS No. 123. On March 29, 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107 to provide guidance regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 123R and disclosures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis. The effective date of SFAS No. 123R was modified by SAB No. 107 to begin with the first annual reporting period of the registrant’s first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, the Company implemented SFAS No. 123R effective October 1, 2005. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs were reported as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires excess tax benefits to be reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.

Previously the Company measured compensation expense for its stock-based employee compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, as permitted by SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”. Had the fair value-based method under SFAS No. 123 been applied, compensation expense would have been recorded for the options outstanding based on their respective vesting schedules.

F-12

(s) Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company accounts for shipping and handling costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs”. In accordance with EITF No. 00-10, revenue received from shipping and handling fees is reflected in net sales.

(t) Reclassifications

Certain balances from 2005 have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.

(u) New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48 and in subsequent periods. FIN 48 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 (our fiscal year 2008) and the provisions of FIN 48 will be applied to all tax positions under Statement No. 109 upon initial adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this interpretation will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for that fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 addresses the process and diversity in practice of quantifying financial statement misstatements resulting in the potential build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. We will be required to adopt the provisions of SAB No.108 in fiscal 2007. We currently do not believe that the adoption of SAB No. 108 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this Statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not believe that the adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 will materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No.87, 88, 106, and 132(R), (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity or changes in unrestricted net assets of a not-for-profit organization. The provisions of this Statement are effective for an employer with publicly traded equity securities and are required to recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 158 on its consolidated financial statements.

F-13

2. INVENTORIES

Inventories are summarized as follows:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Finished goods	$	16,510	$	10,268
Work in progress		30,160		28,173
Raw materials and supplies		38,097		38,913
Demo inventory		11,900		11,346
Service parts		20,298		18,405
Total inventories	$	116,965	$	107,105

3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment include the following:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Buildings	$	29,352	$	28,062
Technical machinery and equipment		20,442		16,351
Construction in progress		951		1,238
Furniture and fixtures		13,660		13,072
Computers and software		7,145		6,535
Leasehold improvements		6,353		5,653
Total property and equipment, at cost	$	77,903	$	70,911

4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, are as follows:

	Germany			United States			Other			Total
Balance as of September 30, 2004	$	39,390		$	9,506		$	12,883		$	61,779
Additional goodwill from acquisitions		—			300			597			897
Currency exchange difference		(831	)		(64	)		(288	)		(1,183	)
Balance as of September 30, 2005	$	38,559		$	9,742		$	13,192		$	61,493
Additional goodwill from acquisitions		—			—			504			504
Currency exchange difference		1,812			138			669			2,619
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	40,371		$	9,880		$	14,365		$	64,616

F-14

The carrying values of other intangible assets are as follows:

	September 30, 2006				September 30, 2005
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
Patents	$	7,580	$	2,826	$	7,212	$	2,090
Customer base		13,856		9,321		13,487		6,098
Other		4,360		3,428		4,088		3,441
Total	$	25,796	$	15,575	$	24,787	$	11,629

Patents are amortized over the life of the patent which ranges from 1 to 20 years. Customer base is amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, was $3,532, $5,270, $2,389, respectively. At September 30, 2006, estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years based on the average exchange rates as of September 30, 2006, are as follows:

2007	$	3,000
2008		2,300
2009		2,200
2010		800
2011		800

5. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities are comprised of the following:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Employee compensation	$	18,300	$	16,372
Warranty reserves		11,754		10,836
Other taxes payable		497		524
Customer deposits		12,349		8,515
Other		12,316		9,902
Total accrued liabilities	$	55,216	$	46,149

The Company provides for the estimated costs of product warranties when revenue is recognized. The estimate of costs to fulfill warranty obligations is based on historical experience and expectation of future conditions. The change in warranty reserves for the years ended September 30, 2006, and 2005, is as follows:

Balance at September 30, 2004	$	13,375
Additional accruals for warranties during the period		2,892
Usage during the period		(5,263	)
Currency translation		(168	)
Balance at September 30, 2005	$	10,836
Additional accruals for warranties during the period		6,881
Usage during the period		(6,453	)
Currency translation		490
Balance at September 30, 2006	$	11,754

F-15

6. LINE OF CREDIT

The Company maintains a $25,000 annually renewable line of credit with Deutsche Bank AG to support its working capital needs. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, $3,425 and $5,352, respectively, were outstanding under this loan facility as a result of borrowings by Rofin-Baasel Japan Corp., Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l., and Rasant at an average fixed interest rate of 2.6% for fiscal year 2006 and 2.3% for fiscal year 2005.

In addition, the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries have several lines of credit, which allow them to borrow in the applicable local currency. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, direct borrowings under these agreements totaled $13,902 and $12,133, respectively. The remaining unused portion of the lines of credit at September 30, 2006, was $50,689, in aggregate. Fixed interest rates vary from 0.8% to 5.0%, depending upon the country and usage of the available credit.

The remaining portion of the financing of the acquisition of CBL and its existing debt ($ 2,667) was included in the caption “Line of Credit and Short-Term Borrowings” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005. The debt was fully repaid in 2006.

7. LONG-TERM DEBT

Dilas and RSL maintain additional long-term credit facilities of $3,420, which expire in 2008, and $3,167, which expire in 2009. Rasant and Rofin-Baasel France S.A. maintain long-term credit facilities of $82 and $17, respectively, which expire in 2009 and 2008. CBL maintains long-term credit facilities of $6,335, which expire in 2008, and $5,068 are borrowed under the credit line with Deutsche Bank which also expire in 2008. As of September 30, 2006, $18,089 was borrowed under such facilities at an average interest rate of 3.4%. As of September 30, 2005, $20,850 was borrowed under such facilities at an average interest rate of 3.5%.

The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements for a total notional amount of Euro 13,000 (equivalent to $16,470 based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) to minimize exposure to fluctuation of interest rates on short and long-term debt on which the interest rate is reset every six months.

8. LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company leases operating facilities and equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates through 2017 (see note 12). The lease agreements require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses by the Company.

Minimum lease payments for future fiscal years under non-cancelable operating leases as of September 30, 2006, are:

Fiscal year ending September 30,	Total
2007	$	5,885
2008		4,258
2009		2,730
2010		1,395
2011		764
2012 and thereafter		702

Rent expense charged to operations for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, approximated $6,652, $7,320, and $5,622, respectively.

F-16

9. INCOME TAXES

Total income taxes for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, were allocated as follows:

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Income taxes from continuing operations	$	27,041		$	20,595		$	17,648
Stockholders’ equity;
Tax benefit applicable to the exercise of stock options		(323	)		(1,420	)		(1,793	)
Tax benefit (expense) applicable to the additional minimum pension obligation		470			(746	)		—
Tax expense applicable to the fair value of interest swap agreements		116			176			360
Total income tax	$	27,304		$	18,605		$	16,215

Income before income taxes is attributable to the following geographic regions:

	Years ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
United States	$	12,989	$	12,037	$	9,634
Germany		51,137		38,343		33,042
France		402		945		555
Italy		1,707		1,118		582
Japan		565		889		494
United Kingdom		3,373		1,389		2,395
Singapore		2,536		1,906		2,298
Other		3,955		1,943		1,078
Total income before income taxes	$	76,664	$	58,570	$	50,078

Income tax expense is comprised of the following amounts:

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Current:
United States	$	5,212		$	4,326		$	2,126
Foreign		25,909			19,956			14,996
Total current		31,121			24,282			17,122
Deferred:
United States		(2,018	)		(1,473	)		680
Foreign		(2,062	)		(2,214	)		(154	)
Total deferred		(4,080	)		(3,687	)		526
Total income tax expense	$	27,041		$	20,595		$	17,648

Statutory tax rates in the U.S., U.K., Italy, France, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, China, and Canada approximate 35%, 30%, 37.25%, 33.33%, 35%, 33,99%, 31.19%, 28%, 20%, 40.30%, 32.50%, 25.34%, 15%, and 34%, respectively. Generally, in Germany retained corporate income is subject to a municipal trade tax (which approximates 17%), which is deductible for German federal corporate income tax purposes, a federal corporate income tax of 25% and a surcharge of 5.5% on the federal corporate income tax amount.

F-17

The difference between actual income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate is as follows:

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
U.S. federal statutory tax rate		35	%		34	%		34	%
Computed “expected” tax expense	$	26,833		$	19,914		$	17,027
Difference between U.S. and foreign statutory rates		1,398			1,813			1,117
Minority interest and other permanent differences		89			114			389
Adjustment of valuation allowance		(2,112	)		(1,045	)		(740	)
Other		833			(201	)		(145	)
Actual tax expense	$	27,041		$	20,595		$	17,648

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the net deferred taxes are as follows:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Deferred income tax assets:
Foreign
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	521		$	678
Pension obligations		1,150			1,389
Inventories		2,673			2,156
Accrued liabilities		283			—
Other		342			346
Total Foreign		4,969			4,569
United States:
Net operating loss carryforwards		427			1,988
Warranty reserve		537			529
Inventories		3,948			3,796
Allowance for doubtful accounts		286			207
Accrued liabilities		411			—
Pension obligations		249			252
Stock-based compensation expense		266			—
Other		217			269
Total United States		6,341			7,041
Gross deferred income tax assets		11,310			11,610
Less: Valuation allowance		(17	)		(2,129	)
Net deferred income tax assets	$	11,293		$	9,481
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Foreign:
Property and equipment		(1,689	)		(1,488	)
Accrued liabilities		—			(55	)
Accounts receivable		—			(170	)
Accounts payable		—			(1,613	)
Intangibles		(1,416	)		(899	)
Other		(849	)		(627	)
Total Foreign		(3,954	)		(4,852	)
United States:
Property & equipment		(402	)		(479	)
Intangibles		(1,366	)		(1,873	)
Total United States		(1,768	)		(2,352	)
Gross deferred income tax liabilities		(5,722	)		(7,204	)
Net deferred income tax assets	$	5,571		$	2,277

F-18

The total deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as follows:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Deferred income tax assets – current	$	9,974		$	8,003
Deferred income tax assets – non current		1,818			2,949
Deferred income tax liabilities – current		(874	)		(3,336	)
Deferred income tax liabilities – non current		(5,347	)		(5,339	)
Net deferred income tax assets	$	5,571		$	2,277

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowances at September 30, 2006. The Company had established a valuation allowance related to net operating loss carryforwards at RB Inc. due to uncertainty regarding RB Inc.’s ability to generate future taxable income required to utilize these carryforwards. The valuation allowance decreased in fiscal years 2006 and 2005 by $2,112 and $981, respectively due to actual profits and changes in management’s assumptions about the future profitability of RB Inc. and utilization of the net operating loss carryforward.

At September 30, 2006, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards available of $899 in the United States (which expire as follows: $898 in 2023, $1 in 2025) and $1,489 in Germany, and $141 in Spain (which have no expiration date). The annual utilization by the Company of its U.S. net operating loss carryforwards will be subject to certain annual limitations under Section 382 of the “Internal Revenue Code”.

The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries because these earnings are intended to be permanently reinvested in those operations. Earnings may become taxable upon an actual or deemed repatriation of assets from the subsidiaries or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiaries. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability for these undistributed earnings.

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has defined benefit pension plans for the RSL and RS Inc. employees. The Company’s U.S. plan began in fiscal year 1995 and is funded. As is the normal practice with German companies, the German pension plan is unfunded. Any new employees, hired after the acquisition of CBL, are not eligible for the RSL pension plan. The measurement date of the Company’s pension plans is September 30.

The determination of the Company’s obligation and expense for pension is dependent on the selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating those amounts. Assumptions are made about interest rates, expected investment return on plan assets, total turnover rates, and rates of future compensation increases. In addition, the Company’s actuarial consultants use subjective factors such as withdrawal rates and mortality rates to develop their calculations of these amounts. The Company generally reviews these assumptions at the beginning of each fiscal year. The Company is required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in making these assumptions. The actuarial assumptions that the Company uses may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact on the amount of pension benefits expense the Company has recorded or may record.

The discount rate enables the Company to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. The Company has little latitude in selecting this rate and it must represent the market rate of high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense.

F-19

To determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets.

The following table sets forth the funded status of the plans at the balance sheet dates:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	16,013		$	12,362
Service cost		719			566
Interest cost		727			680
Actuarial (gains) losses		(1,291	)		2,747
Amortization of unrecognized gains/losses		102			—
Foreign exchange rate changes		436			(209	)
Benefits paid		(210	)		(133	)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year		16,496			16,013
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		3,649			3,266
Actual return on plan assets		191			323
Employer contributions		275			150
Benefits paid		(94	)		(90	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		4,021			3,649
Funded status		(12,475	)		(12,364	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		1,959			3,145
Unrecognized prior service cost		—			25
Additional minimum liability		(779	)		(1,932	)
Accrued benefit cost	$	(11,295	)	$	(11,126	)

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year	$	15,012		$	14,192
Discount rate:
United States		5.3	%		5.5	%
Foreign		4.5	%		4	%
Expected return on plan assets –
United States only		8.0	%		8.0	%
Rate of compensation increase
United States		2.0	%		3.0	%
Foreign		1.3	%		1.3	%

A minimum pension liability adjustment is required when the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds plan assets and accrued pension liabilities. The minimum liability adjustment, net of tax benefit, is reported as a component of other comprehensive income included in stockholders’ equity. The amount recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax benefit, was $479 at September 30, 2006, and $1,186 at September 30, 2005. The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan with an accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets and accrued pension liability was $10,501 as if September 30, 2006 and $10,331 as of September 30, 2005.

F-20

The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the respective fiscal years:

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Service cost	$	719		$	566		$	566
Interest cost		727			680			635
Expected return on plan assets		(297	)		(272	)		(197	)
Amortization of prior service cost		25			63			63
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,174		$	1,037		$	1,067

RS Inc. has a minimum required contribution to its defined pension plans of approximately $0.4 million for the fiscal 2006 plan year, which it intends to make in fiscal year 2007. The Company has not determined whether it will make additional voluntary contributions for this plan.

Expected benefit payments for each of the next five fiscal years and for the five years aggregated thereafter is as follows: $192 in 2007, $346 in 2008, $403 in 2009, $504 in 2010, $559 in 2011, and $3,768 thereafter.

The Company’s pension plan allocations at September 30, 2006 and 2005, by asset category are as follows:

	2006					2005
	Dollar Value		Percentage			Dollar Value		Percentage
Money Market Funds	$	635		15	%	$	284		8	%
Stocks		2,646		65	%		2,261		62	%
Government Securities		740		20	%		1,104		30	%
Total plan assets	$	4,021		100	%	$	3,649		100	%

The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of stocks and government securities are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. The intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by maximizing investment returns within that prudent level of risk. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalizations. Additionally, cash balances are maintained at levels adequate to meet near term plan expenses and benefit payments. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through semi-annual investment portfolio reviews.

RS Inc., RB Inc., PRC, Lee Laser, Rofin-Baasel Canada Ltd., and Dilas Diodelaser Inc. have 401(k) plans for the benefit of all eligible U.S. employees, as defined by the plan. Participating employees may contribute up to 16% of their qualified annual compensation. Those subsidiaries match 50% of the first 5 to 6% of the employees’ compensation contributed as a salary deferral. Company contributions for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, were $374, $406, and $246, respectively.

11. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The calculation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each period is as follows:

	Years ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Weighted number of shares for basic earnings per common share		15,283,817		15,071,692		13,478,606
Potential additional shares due to outstanding dilutive stock options		403,075		489,314		541,548
Weighted number of shares for diluted earnings per common share		15,686,892		15,561,006		14,020,154

Excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the year ended September 30, 2004, was 285,500 outstanding stock options. These options were not included in the 2004 calculations because their effect on earnings per share was anti-dilutive. No shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2006.

F-21

12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company had sales to its minority shareholder in Japan amounting to $1,755, $1,128, and $1,811, in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the accounts receivable with the minority shareholder in Japan amounted to $1,157 and $882, respectively.

RSL paid commissions to its minority shareholder of Rofin-Baasel China of $284 in fiscal 2006. No balances were outstanding as of September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2005 the company had accounts receivables of $228 from this minority shareholder.

The Company’s sales to related parties have generally been on terms comparable to those available in connection with sales to unaffiliated parties.

The main facility in Starnberg is rented under a 25-year operating lease from the former minority shareholder of CBL Mr. Baasel, who is also a member of the board of directors of the Company, and includes a clause to terminate the lease contract within a two-year notice period during the contract. The Company paid rent expense of $644, $645, and $614, to Mr. Baasel during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

The Company has accrued $127 and $120 at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for the option to purchase the remaining minority interests in Optoskand AB and $135 is accrued for accumulated interest on this obligation. In addition the Company has accrued $31 at September 30, 2006 based on an earn-out agreement with the minority shareholder of Optoskand. These amounts are included in accounts payable to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

13. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Company manages its business under geographic regions that are aggregated together as one segment in the global industrial laser industry. Sales from these regions have similar long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. The products from these regions utilize similar manufacturing processes and use similar production equipment, which may be interchanged from group to group. The Company distributes, sells and services final product to the same type of customers from all regions.

Assets, revenues, and income before taxes, by geographic region are summarized below:

ASSETS

	September 30,
	2006			2005
North America	$	233,379		$	219,949
Germany		309,324			280,047
Other		157,499			146,992
Intercompany eliminations		(198,681	)		(218,350	)
Total assets	$	501,521		$	428,638

REVENUES - TOTAL BUSINESS

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
North America	$	130,374		$	111,581		$	74,643
Germany		313,576			286,619			284,876
Other		140,561			125,227			111,589
Intercompany eliminations		(163,621	)		(148,236	)		(148,480	)
	$	420,890		$	375,191		$	322,628

F-22

INTERCOMPANY REVENUES

	Years ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
North America	$	3,874		$	3,027		$	3,928
Germany		125,944			121,118			117,974
Other		33,803			24,091			26,578
Intercompany eliminations		(163,621	)		(148,236	)		(148,480	)
	$	—		$	—		$	—

EXTERNAL REVENUES

	Years ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
North America	$	126,500	$	108,554	$	70,715
Germany		187,632		165,501		166,902
Other		106,758		101,136		85,011
	$	420,890	$	375,191	$	322,628

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

	Years ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
North America	$	12,947	$	12,037	$	9,634
Germany		51,137		38,343		33,042
Other		12,580		8,190		7,402
	$	76,664	$	58,570	$	50,078

14. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

The following represents the Company’s quarterly results (millions of dollars, except per share amounts):

	Quarters ended
	Dec. 31, 2005		March 31, 2006		June 30, 2006		Sept. 30, 2006
Net sales	$	95.4	$	99.8	$	109.6	$	116.1
Gross profit		40.8		43.5		46.9		47.1
Net income		11.3		11.7		12.9		13.7
Earnings per share – Basic		0.75		0.76		0.84		0.89
Earnings per share – Diluted		0.73		0.75		0.82		0.87

	Quarters ended
	Dec. 31, 2004		March 31, 2005		June 30, 2005		Sept. 30, 2005
Net sales	$	91.4	$	95.4	$	89.5	$	98.9
Gross profit		36.2		37.6		36.5		42.7
Net income		8.5		8.7		8.4		12.3
Earnings per share – Basic		0.57		0.58		0.56		0.81
Earnings per share – Diluted		0.55		0.56		0.54		0.79

F-23

15. STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS

Directors’ Plan

The Company has reserved 100,000 shares of common stock for the Directors’ Plan, which covers non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Under this plan each member of the Board of Directors who is not an employee of the Company and who is elected or continues as a member of the Board of Directors is entitled to receive an initial grant of 1,500 shares of common stock and thereafter an annual grant of 1,500 shares of common stock. The Directors’ Plan also provides that non-employee directors aged 65 or older, upon their appointment or election to the Board of Directors, will receive, in lieu of such initial and annual grants of shares of common stock, 7,500 shares of restricted stock which shall vest in five equal installments on the date of grant and each of the following four anniversaries thereof. Prior to vesting, no shares of restricted stock may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of, subject to certain exceptions. The Company records compensation expense based on the fair market value of the common stock, as determined by the closing price at the date of issuance. The Directors’ Plan will continue in effect until the earlier of ten years from the date of the first grant or the termination of the Directors’ Plan by the Board of Directors. A total of 40,500 shares are issued and outstanding under the plan at September 30, 2006.

Equity Incentive Plan

The Company maintains an Equity Incentive Plan, whereby incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and performance shares may be granted to officers and other key employees to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock at a price not less than the fair market value on the date of grant. The term of the Equity Incentive Plan continues through 2011. There were no incentive stock options, restricted stock or performance shares granted in fiscal years 2006, 2005, or 2004. Non-qualified stock options were granted to officers and other key employees in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004. Options generally vest over five years and will expire not later than ten years after the date on which they are granted.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, as a replacement to SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, which allowed companies to use the intrinsic method of valuing share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair-value method as defined in SFAS No. 123. On March 29, 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107 to provide guidance regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 123R and disclosures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis. The effective date of SFAS No. 123R was modified by SAB No. 107 to begin with the first annual reporting period of the registrant’s first fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, the Company implemented SFAS No. 123R effective October 1, 2005. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs were reported as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires excess tax benefits to be reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.

Previously the Company measured compensation expense for its stock-based employee compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, as permitted by SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”. Had the fair value-based method under SFAS No. 123 been applied, compensation expense would have been recorded for the options outstanding based on their respective vesting schedules.

F-24

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share in 2005 and 2004 as if the fair value based method under SFAS No. 123 had been applied to all outstanding vested and unvested awards in those periods:

	Years ended September 30,
	2005			2004
Net Income - as reported	$	37,975		$	32,430
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported income, net of related tax benefits		176			146
Deduct: Total stock compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(1,521	)		(1,270	)
	$	36,630		$	31,306
Basic earnings per share:
As reported	$	2.52		$	2.41
Pro-forma	$	2.43		$	2.32
Diluted earnings per share:
As reported	$	2.44		$	2.31
Pro-forma	$	2.35		$	2.23

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model.

The following assumptions were used in the determination of compensation cost under the provisions of SFAS No. 123 for the year ended September 30, 2006:

	September 30,
	2006 Grants			2005 Grants
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	26.51		$	15.41
Expected life		5 Years			5 Years
Volatility		50.0	%		50.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.61	%		3.74	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Annual forfeiture rate		1.09	%		1.09	%

The Company uses historical data to estimate the expected life, volatility, and estimated forfeitures of an option. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The balance of outstanding stock options and all options activity for the three year period ended September 30, 2006, are as follows:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (Millions)
Balance at September 30, 2003		999,600		$	10 2/7		7.33	$	12.4
Granted		285,500		$	32 ¼
Exercised		(154,450	)	$	11
Balance at September 30, 2004		1,130,650		$	15 6/7		7.51	$	15.3
Granted		379,000		$	34 1/7
Exercised		(186,850	)	$	11 7/9
Forfeited		(33,200	)	$	16 1/6
Balance at September 30, 2005		1,289,600		$	21 3/5		7.54	$	21.1
Granted		292,250		$	52 1/5
Exercised		(249,550	)	$	14 7/8
Forfeited		(14,600	)	$	13 5/8
Balance at September 30, 2006		1,317,700		$	29 ¾		7.41	$	40.9
Exercisable at September 30, 2006		408,500		$	17 ¼		5.66	$	17.8

F-25

As of September 30, 2006, there was $13.4 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.62 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $2.7 million, $1.7 million, and $0.9 million respectively.

	Years ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised	$	8.6	$	4.6	$	3.0

Cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $3.7 million, $2.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

F-26

ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts - Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004
(dollars in thousands)

	Balance at Beginning of Period			Acquired Reserve			Charged to Costs and Expenses				Additions (Deductions)				Balance at End of Period
September 30, 2004		$	2,066		$	109		$	230			$	114			$	2,519
September 30, 2005		$	2,519		$	—		$	(29	)		$	(92	)		$	2,398
September 30, 2006		$	2,398		$	—		$	642			$	(384	)		$	2,656

F-27

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Exhibit
21.1	List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

F-28