XML 47 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Jan. 28, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Schedule of Rent Expense
A summary of rent expense follows:
(in thousands)
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Store rent:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed minimum(1)
$
408,575

 
$
404,836

 
$
432,794

Contingent
11,690

 
10,161

 
8,886

Deferred lease credits amortization
(24,557
)
 
(28,619
)
 
(38,437
)
Total store rent expense
395,708

 
386,378

 
403,243

Buildings, equipment and other
5,772

 
3,849

 
4,619

Total rent expense
$
401,480

 
$
390,227

 
$
407,862


(1) Includes lease termination fees of $15.5 million, $3.3 million and $12.4 million for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. Fiscal 2015 includes a benefit of $1.6 million related to better than expected lease exit terms associated with the closure of the Gilly Hicks stand-alone stores. Fiscal 2014 includes lease termination fees of $6.8 million related to the Gilly Hicks restructuring.
Schedule of Operating Lease Commitments Under Non-Cancelable Leases
A summary of operating lease commitments, including leasehold financing obligations, under non-cancelable leases follows:
(in thousands)
 
Fiscal 2017
$
350,503

Fiscal 2018
$
289,742

Fiscal 2019
$
221,797

Fiscal 2020
$
178,719

Fiscal 2021
$
139,477

Thereafter
$
369,709

Schedule of Weighted Average Number of Shares
The following table presents weighted-average shares outstanding and anti-dilutive shares:
(in thousands)
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Shares of common stock issued
103,300

 
103,300

 
103,300

Weighted-average treasury shares
(35,422
)
 
(34,420
)
 
(31,515
)
Weighted-average — basic shares
67,878

 
68,880

 
71,785

Dilutive effect of share-based compensation awards
406

 
537

 
1,152

Weighted-average — diluted shares
68,284

 
69,417

 
72,937

Anti-dilutive shares (1)
6,107

 
8,967

 
6,144



(1) 
Reflects the total number of shares related to outstanding share-based compensation awards that have been excluded from the computation of net income per diluted share because the impact would have been anti-dilutive.