XML 55 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Severance, Exit Costs and Asset Impairments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Severance, Exit Costs & Asset Impairments [Abstract]  
Severance, Exit Costs and Asset Impairments [Text Block]
Note 9.
Severance, Exit Costs and Asset Impairments
Severance and Exit Costs Activity
For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, we recognized costs of $184 million, solely attributable to our Wireless segment, primarily related to lease exit costs associated with taking certain Nextel platform sites off-air in 2012, for which we no longer expect to receive any economic benefit. In addition, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, we recognized costs of $27 million ($13 million Wireless; $14 million Wireline) in "Cost of services and products" within the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss related to payments that will continue to be made under our backhaul access contracts for which we will no longer be receiving any economic benefit. We did not recognize any severance or exit costs in the first half of 2011. We expect to incur significant additional exit costs in the future as we continue to take Nextel platform sites off-air and transition our existing backhaul architecture to a replacement technology for our remaining network sites. The amount of these costs cannot be estimated at this time.
The following provides the activity in the severance and exit costs liability included in "Accounts payable", “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” and "Other liabilities" within the consolidated balance sheets:
 
 
 
2012 Activity
 
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
Net
Expense
 
Cash Payments
and Other
 
June 30, 2012
 
(in millions)
Lease exit costs
$
58

 
$
184

 
$
9

 
$
251

Severance costs
21

 

 
1

 
22

Access exit costs

 
27

 

 
27

 
$
79

 
$
211

 
$
10

 
$
300


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset Impairments
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, we recorded asset impairments of $84 million of construction in progress costs consisting of $18 million associated with a decision to utilize fiber backhaul, which we expect to be more cost effective, rather than microwave backhaul and $66 million of capitalized assets specific to the spectrum hosting arrangement that we no longer intend to deploy (see Note 11). For the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 and the first half of 2011, there were no asset impairments recorded.