10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 __________________________________

FORM 10-Q

 __________________________________

(Mark One)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

or

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 0-25731

__________________________________

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

__________________________________

Georgia	58-2250094
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
6200 The Corners Pkwy., Norcross, Georgia	30092-3365
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code	(770) 449-7800

N/A

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the “Partnership” or the “Registrant”) other than historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Specifically, we consider, among others, statements concerning future operating results and cash flows, our ability to meet future obligations, and the amount and timing of any future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We make no representations or warranties (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Any such forward-looking statements are subject to unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, provide distributions to partners, and maintain the value of our real estate properties, may be significantly hindered. See Item 1A. in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for a discussion of some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.

Page 2

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page No.
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
		Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010	5
		Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and 2010 (unaudited)	6
		Statements of Partners’ Capital for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited)	7
		Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and 2010 (unaudited)	8
		Condensed Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)	9
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	20
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	20
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	21
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	21
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	21
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	21
	Item 4.	REMOVED AND RESERVED	21
	Item 5.	Other Information	21
	Item 6.	Exhibits	21

Page 3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information presented in the Partnership’s accompanying balance sheets and statements of operations, partners’ capital, and cash flows reflects all adjustments that are, in management’s opinion, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the aforementioned financial statements.

The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the Partnership’s financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included both in this report on Form 10-Q and in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Partnership’s results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year.

Page 4

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Assets:
Investment in joint ventures	$	1,236,672	$	2,239,616
Cash and cash equivalents	1,704,521		704,810
Due from joint ventures	13,621		26,960
Other assets	2,444		—
Total assets	$	2,957,258	$	2,971,386
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	2,477	$	9,125
Due to affiliates	5,924		6,418
Total liabilities	8,401		15,543
Commitments and Contingencies
Partners' Capital:
Limited Partners:
Class A – 1,430,724 units issued and outstanding	2,878,060		2,952,216
Class B – 222,556 units issued and outstanding	70,797		3,627
General Partners	—		—
Total partners’ capital	2,948,857		2,955,843
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	2,957,258	$	2,971,386

See accompanying notes.

Page 5

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures	$	902		$	(10,741	)	$	101,090		$	(128,139	)
Interest and Other Income	901			256			1,823			762
General and Administrative Expenses	28,956			29,546			109,899			114,694
Net Loss	$	(27,153	)	$	(40,031	)	$	(6,986	)	$	(242,071	)
Net Income (Loss) Allocated to:
Class A Limited Partners	$	—		$	(39,087	)	$	(74,156	)	$	(241,127	)
Class B Limited Partners	$	(27,153	)	$	(944	)	$	67,170		$	(944	)
General Partners	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net Income (Loss) per Weighted-Average Limited Partner Unit:
Class A	$	0.00		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.17	)
Class B	$	(0.12	)	$	0.00		$	0.30		$	0.00
Weighted-Average Limited Partner Units Outstanding:
Class A	1,430,724			1,430,724			1,430,724			1,431,024
Class B	222,556			222,556			222,556			222,256

See accompanying notes.

Page 6

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

	Limited Partners								General Partners		Total Partners’ Capital
	Class A					Class B
	Units		Amount			Units	Amount
BALANCE, December 31, 2009	1,431,174		$	3,204,434		222,106	$	—	$	—	$	3,204,434
Class A conversion elections	(450	)	(944		)	450	944		—		—
Net loss	—		(251,274		)	—	2,683		—		(248,591		)
BALANCE, December 31, 2010	1,430,724		2,952,216			222,556	3,627		—		2,955,843
Net income (loss)	—		(74,156		)	—	67,170		—		(6,986		)
BALANCE, September 30, 2011	1,430,724		$	2,878,060		222,556	$	70,797	$	—	$	2,948,857

See accompanying notes.

Page 7

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	(Unaudited)
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(6,986	)	$	(242,071	)
Operating distributions received from joint ventures	96,588			108,736
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures	(101,090		)	128,139
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets	(2,444		)	—
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses	(6,648		)	(2,973		)
Decrease in due to affiliates	(494		)	(1,445		)
Net cash used in operating activities	(21,074		)	(9,614		)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net sale proceeds received from joint ventures	1,094,252			—
Investment in joint ventures	(73,467		)	(21,141		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1,020,785			(21,141		)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	999,711			(30,755		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period	704,810			449,194
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	1,704,521		$	418,439

See accompanying notes.

Page 8

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 (unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. (“Wells Partners”), a Georgia nonpublic limited partnership, serving as its general partners (collectively, the “General Partners”). Wells Capital, Inc. (“Wells Capital”) serves as the corporate general partner of Wells Partners. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. (“WREF”). Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the president, sole director, and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership was formed on June 20, 1996 for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription, limited partners elected to have their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units. Limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units one time during each quarterly accounting period. Limited partners may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; and (c) add or remove a general partner. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights regardless of class.

On December 31, 1997, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $35,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The offering was terminated on December 30, 1998, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 1,302,942 Class A Units and 350,338 Class B Units representing total limited partner capital contributions of $16,532,802.

The Partnership owns indirect interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP (“Piedmont OP”), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (“Piedmont REIT”), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the “Joint Ventures”) and properties:

Joint Venture	Joint Venture Partners	Ownership %	Properties
The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture (“Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates”)	• Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. • Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP	39.0% 48.5% 8.8% 3.7%	1. 360 Interlocken Building(1) A three-story office building located in Broomfield, Colorado 2. Avaya Building(2) A one-story office building located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Fund X and Fund XI Associates (“Fund X-XI Associates”)	• Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.	58.0% 42.0%	This joint venture only owns an interest in another joint venture, Wells/Fremont Associates, and does not own any properties directly.
Wells/Fremont Associates (“Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont”)	• Fund X-XI Associates • Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP	22.5% 77.5%	3. 47300 Kato Road(3)  A two-story warehouse and office building located in Fremont, California
The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture (“Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates”)	• Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. • Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP	26.1% 17.1% 56.8%	4. 20/20 Building A three-story office building located in Leawood, Kansas

⁽¹⁾  This property was sold in June 2011.

⁽²⁾  This property was sold in October 2010.

⁽³⁾  This property was sold in August 2011.

Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P., Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P., and Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. are affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis. For further information regarding the Joint Ventures and foregoing properties, refer to the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Page 9

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to fairly and consistently present the results for such periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Investment in Joint Ventures

The Partnership has evaluated the Joint Ventures and concluded that none are variable interest entities. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture partners is required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint Ventures, or their real property investments. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Joint Ventures using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income (loss) and distributions are allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, are generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets

The Partnership continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned through the Partnership’s investment in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present, which suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to their respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value.

While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as little, if any, related market activity or information is available. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Partnership may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Partnership’s assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Distributions of Net Cash from Operations

Net cash from operations, if available and unless reserved, is generally distributed quarterly to the limited partners as follows:

• First, to all limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis until such limited partners have received distributions equal to a 10% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined.

Page 10

• Second, to the General Partners until the General Partners have received distributions equal to 10% of the total cumulative distributions paid by the Partnership.

• Third, to the limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis and the General Partners allocated on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.

No distributions of net cash from operations will be made to limited partners holding Class B Units.

Distribution of Net Sale Proceeds

Upon sales of properties, unless reserved, net sale proceeds will be distributed in the following order:

• In the event that the particular property sold is sold for a price that is less than its original property purchase price, to the limited partners holding Class A Units until they have received an amount equal to the excess of the original property purchase price over the price for which the property was sold, limited to the amount of depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery deductions taken by the limited partners holding Class B Units with respect to such property;

• To limited partners holding units which at any time have been treated as Class B Units until the limited partners have received an amount necessary to equal the net cash from operations previously distributed to the limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis;

• To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received 100% of their respective net capital contributions, as defined;

• To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received a cumulative 10% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined;

• To limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their respective preferential limited partner return (defined as the sum of a 10% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Class A Units and a 15% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Class B Units);

• To the General Partners until they have received 100% of their capital contributions, as defined;

• Then, if limited partners have received any excess limited partner distributions (defined as distributions to limited partners over the life of their investment in the Partnership in excess of their net capital contributions, as defined, plus their preferential limited partner return), to the General Partners until they have received distributions equal to 20% of the sum of any such excess limited partner distributions plus distributions made to the General Partners pursuant to this provision; and

• Thereafter, 80% to the limited partners on a per-unit basis and 20% to the General Partners.

Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale

For the purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery and the gain on the sale of assets. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportion that net cash from operations is distributed to the partners holding Class A Units and the General Partners. To the extent the Partnership’s net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, such excess net income will be allocated 99% to the limited partners holding Class A Units and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero, (b) then, to any partner having a positive balance in his capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance, and (c) thereafter, to the General Partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnership’s properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to the qualified income offset provisions of the partnership agreement, (b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero, and (c) allocations to limited partners holding Class B Units in amounts equal to the deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.

Page 11

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASU 2010-6”). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Partnership's financial statements or disclosures.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement Topic Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 converges the GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards definition of “fair value,” the requirements for measuring amounts at fair value, and disclosures about these measurements. The update does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 will be effective for the Partnership on December 15, 2011. The Partnership does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have a material impact on its financial statements or disclosures.

3. INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

Summary of Financial Information

Condensed financial information for the joint ventures in which the Partnership held direct interests for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is presented below:

	Total Revenues				Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010			2011			2010
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates	$	—	$	—	$	(4,042	)	$	(2,431	)	$	3,397	$	(15,902	)	$	(645	)	$	(18,333	)
Fund X-XI Associates	—		—		12,761			(20,763		)	—		—			12,761			(20,763		)
Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates	344,908		337,406		(16,823		)	(1,576		)	—		—			(16,823		)	(1,576		)
	$	344,908	$	337,406	$	(8,104	)	$	(24,770	)	$	3,397	$	(15,902	)	$	(4,707	)	$	(40,672	)

	Total Revenues				Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended						Nine Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010			2011			2010
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates	$	—	$	—	$	(24,668	)	$	(15,561	)	$	1,354,512	$	(1,474,622	)	$	1,329,844		$	(1,490,183	)
Fund X-XI Associates	—		—		(17,044		)	27,313			—		—			(17,044		)	27,313
Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates	911,978		885,383		(32,996		)	(33,048		)	—		—			(32,996		)	(33,048		)
	$	911,978	$	885,383	$	(74,708	)	$	(21,296	)	$	1,354,512	$	(1,474,622	)	$	1,279,804		$	(1,495,918	)

Page 12

Condensed financial information for the joint venture in which the Partnership held an interest through its equity interest in Fund X-XI Associates for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is presented below:

	Total Revenues				Loss From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010			2011		2010
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates – Fremont	$	—	$	—	$	(2,855	)	$	(2,432	)	$	59,582	$	(89,864	)	$	56,727	$	(92,296	)

	Total Revenues				Loss From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended						Nine Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011			2010		2011			2010
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates – Fremont	$	—	$	—	$	(14,269	)	$	(13,322	)	$	(61,494	)	$	134,735	$	(75,763	)	$	121,413

The Partnership allocates its share of net income, net loss, and gain on sale generated by the properties owned by the Joint Ventures to its Class A and Class B limited partners pursuant to the partnership agreement provisions outlined in Note 2. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations recognized by the Joint Ventures are provided below:

	Nine Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011								September 30, 2010
	Operating Income (Loss)			Gain on Sale		Total			Operating Income (Loss)			Impairment Loss			Gain on Sale		Total
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates	$	127,569		$	1,226,943	$	1,354,512		$	(26,405	)	$	(1,448,217	)	$	—	$	(1,474,622	)
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates – Fremont	(152,699		)	91,205		(61,494		)	134,735			—			—		134,735
	$	(25,130	)	$	1,318,148	$	1,293,018		$	108,330		$	(1,448,217	)	$	—	$	(1,339,887	)

Due from Joint Ventures

As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due from joint ventures as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represents operating cash flow generated by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is attributable to the Partnership.

4. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Management and Leasing Fees

The Partnership entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnership’s properties owned through the Joint Ventures, equal to (a) 2.5% for management services and 2% for leasing services of the gross revenues collected monthly (aggregate maximum of 4.5%), plus a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) in the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, are included in equity in income (loss) of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. The Partnership’s share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures and payable to Wells Management is $568 and $1,523 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $2,215 and $3,644 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Page 13

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, one of the Partnership’s General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. The Partnership incurred administrative expenses of $16,711 and $18,591 payable to Wells Capital and Wells Management for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $47,744 and $58,061 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In addition, Wells Capital and Wells Management pay for certain operating expenses of the Partnership (“bill-backs”) directly and invoice the Partnership for the reimbursement thereof on a quarterly basis. As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliates as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represents administrative reimbursements and bill-backs due to Wells Capital and/or Wells Management.

Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT filed a putative class action and derivative complaint, presently styled In re Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Securities Litigation, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against, among others, Piedmont REIT; Leo F. Wells, III, one of the Partnership's General Partners; Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, the Partnership's other General Partner; Wells Management, the Partnership's property manager; certain affiliates of WREF; the directors of Piedmont REIT; and certain individuals who formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT prior to the closing of the internalization transaction on April 16, 2007.

The complaint alleged, among other things, violations of the federal proxy rules and breaches of fiduciary duty arising from the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction and the related proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as amended. The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and nullification of the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction.

On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which attempted to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who received and were entitled to vote on the Piedmont REIT proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, and derivative claims on behalf of Piedmont REIT.

On March 31, 2008, the Court granted in part the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Court dismissed five of the seven counts of the amended complaint in their entirety. The Court dismissed the remaining two counts with the exception of allegations regarding the failure to disclose in the Piedmont REIT proxy statement details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. On April 21, 2008, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which alleges violations of the federal proxy rules based upon allegations that the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction omitted details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT.  The second amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified monetary damages, to nullify and rescind the internalization transaction, and to cancel and rescind any stock issued to the defendants as consideration for the internalization transaction. On May 12, 2008, the defendants answered and raised certain defenses to the second amended complaint.

On June 23, 2008, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. On September 16, 2009, the Court granted the plaintiff's motion for class certification. On September 20, 2009, the defendants filed a petition for permission to appeal immediately the Court's order granting the motion for class certification with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The petition for permission to appeal was denied on October 30, 2009. On April 13, 2009, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend the second amended complaint to add additional defendants. The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend on June 23, 2009.

On December 4, 2009, the parties filed motions for summary judgment. On August 2, 2010, the Court entered an order denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment and granting, in part, the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The Court ruled that the question of whether certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT constituted “material” information required to be disclosed in the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction raises questions of fact that must be determined at trial. A trial date has not been set.

Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, and Wells Management believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this action. Any financial loss incurred by Wells Capital, Wells Management, or their affiliates could hinder their ability to successfully manage the Partnership's operations and portfolio of investments.

Page 14

5. ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY

The Partnership has engaged Wells Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services, including supervision of the management and leasing of its properties, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities, including accounting services and investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days’ written notice. As a result of these relationships, the Partnership is dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.

Wells Capital, Wells Management, and Wells Investment Securities, Inc. ("WIS") are owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of Wells Capital, Wells Management, and WIS represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, the Partnership focuses on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF were to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, the Partnership might be required to find alternative service providers.

Future net income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital, Wells Management, and WIS based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored programs and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by WREF-sponsored programs, as well as distribution income earned from its holdings of common stock of Piedmont REIT, which was acquired in connection with the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction (see “Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties” above). As of September 30, 2011, the Partnership has no reason to believe that WREF does not have access to adequate liquidity and capital resources, including cash flow generated from operations, cash on hand, other investments, and borrowing capacity, necessary to meet its current and future obligations as they become due.

The Partnership is also dependent upon the ability of its current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as they become due. The inability of a tenant to pay future rental amounts would be likely to have a negative impact on the Partnership’s results of operations. The Partnership is not currently aware of any reason why its existing tenants should not be able to pay their contractual rental amounts as they become due in all material respects. Situations preventing the tenants from paying contractual rents could result in a material adverse impact on the Partnership’s results of operations.

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Partnership and its General Partners are parties to legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of our business. The Partnership is not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have a materially adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Partnership, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto. See also “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Part I, as well as the notes to our financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Overview

Management believes that the Partnership typically operates through the following five key life cycle phases. The duration of each phase is dependent upon various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the next.

• Fundraising phase

The period during which the Partnership is raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public;

• Investing phase

The period during which the Partnership invests the capital raised during the fundraising phase, less upfront fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets;

• Holding phase

The period during which the Partnership owns and operates its real estate assets during the initial lease terms of the tenants;

Page 15

• Positioning-for-sale phase

The period during which the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, the Partnership expends time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following the holding phase, the Partnership continues to own and operate the real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale; and

• Disposition-and-liquidation phase

The period during which the Partnership sells its real estate investments, distributes net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidates, and terminates the Partnership.

Portfolio Overview

We are currently in the positioning-for-sale phase of our life cycle. Following the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property, we have sold ten of the eleven properties in which we have held interests. On August 25, 2011, Wells/Fremont Associates sold the 47300 Kato Road property to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $3,824,553. As a result of the sale, thePartnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $331,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $9,000, which may be adjusted as additional information becomes available in subsequent periods. While our focus at this time involves leasing and marketing efforts at our remaining property that we believe will ultimately result in the best disposition pricing of our asset for our limited partners, we will evaluate offers to sell our remaining property on an as-is basis.

The third quarter 2011 operating distributions to limited partners were reserved. We anticipate that operating distributions will continue to be reserved due to various factors, including our intention to fund our pro rata share of property operating costs, anticipated re-leasing costs, and capital improvements at our remaining property.

Property Summary

As we move further into the positioning-for-sale phase, we will continue to focus on re-leasing vacant space and space that may become vacant upon the expiration of our current leases. In doing so, we will seek to maximize returns to our limited partners by attempting to negotiate long-term leases at market rental rates while attempting to minimize down time, re-leasing expenditures, ongoing property level costs, and portfolio costs. As our remaining property is positioned for sale, our attention will shift to locating a suitable buyer, negotiating a purchase-sale contract that will attempt to maximize the total return to our limited partners and minimize contingencies and potential post-closing obligations to the buyer. As of October 31, 2011, we owned an interest in one property.

Information relating to the properties owned, or previously owned, by the joint ventures is provided below:

• The Cort Building was sold on September 11, 2003.

• The Johnson Matthey Building was sold on October 5, 2004.

• The Alstom Power - Knoxville Building was sold on March 15, 2005.

• The Gartner Building was sold on April 13, 2005.

• The 1315 West Century Drive property was sold on December 22, 2006.

• The Iomega Building was sold on January 31, 2007.

• The 111 Southchase Boulevard property was sold on May 23, 2007.

• The Avaya Building was sold on October 15, 2010.

• The 360 Interlocken Building was sold on June 2, 2011.

• The 47300 Kato Road property was sold on August 25, 2011.

• The 20/20 Building, located in Leawood, Kansas, is 91% leased. The major leases for approximately 80% of the building extend through October 2012. We are actively working on re-leasing the remaining vacant space in this building.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our operating strategy entails funding expenditures related to the recurring operations of the Joint Ventures’ properties and the portfolio with operating cash flows, including current and prior period operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures, and assessing the amount of remaining cash flows that will be required to fund known future re-leasing costs and other capital improvements. Any residual operating cash flows are generally considered available for distribution to the Class A limited partners and, unless reserved, are generally paid quarterly. To the extent that operating cash flows are insufficient to fund our recurring operations, net sale proceeds will be utilized. As a result, the ongoing monitoring of our cash position is critical to ensuring that

Page 16

adequate liquidity and capital resources are available. Economic downturns in one or more of our core markets could adversely impact the ability of one or more of our tenants to honor lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or space otherwise becomes vacant. In the event of either situation, cash flows and, consequently, our ability to provide funding for capital needs could be adversely affected.

Short-Term Liquidity

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net operating cash outflows, including distributions received from the Joint Ventures, were approximately $21,000, primarily due to (i) Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates retaining its operating cash flow to fund the remaining re-leasing costs at the 360 Interlocken Building, prior to disposition and (ii) the vacancy at 47300 Kato Road, prior to disposition. Operating distributions from the Joint Ventures generally consist of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, less property operating expenses, management fees, general administrative expenses, and capital expenditures. The extent to which any future operating distributions are paid to limited partners will be largely dependent upon the amount of cash generated from the Joint Ventures, our expectations of future cash flows, and determination of near-term cash needs to fund our share of anticipated property operating costs, tenant re-leasing costs, and other capital improvements for our remaining property owned by the Joint Ventures.We anticipate that future operating distributions from the Joint Ventures may decline in the near-term as a result of our intention to fund our pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements at the 20/20 Building.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we invested (i) approximately $57,000 in Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates to fund our pro rata share of the remaining re-leasing costs at the 360 Interlocken Building incurred in connection with the lease agreement with AVNET, Inc. and (ii) approximately $16,000 in Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont to fund our pro rata share of property operating costs at 47300 Kato Road. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we received net sale proceeds of (i) approximately $763,000 from the sale of the 360 Interlocken Building and (ii) approximately $331,000 from the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property.

We believe that the cash on hand and the operating distribution due from Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates is sufficient to cover our working capital needs, including those provided for within our total liabilities of approximately $8,000, as of September 30, 2011.

Long-Term Liquidity

We expect that our future sources of capital will be primarily derived from operating cash flows generated from the remaining property owned by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates and net proceeds generated from the sale of that property. Our future long-term liquidity requirements will include, but not be limited to, funding our share of tenant improvements, renovations, expansions, and other significant capital improvements necessary for the remaining property owned by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates. We expect to continue to use substantially all future net cash flows from operations, including distributions received from the Joint Ventures, to fund leasing costs and capital expenditures necessary to position our remaining property for sale. To the extent that residual operating cash flows remain after considering these funding requirements, we would then distribute such residual operating cash flow to the limited partners.

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and operating income-producing real properties or investing in joint ventures formed for the same purpose, and has invested all of the partners’ original net offering proceeds available for investment. Thus, it is unlikely that we will acquire interests in any additional properties or joint ventures. Historically, our investment strategy has generally involved acquiring properties that are pre-leased to creditworthy tenants on an all-cash basis through joint ventures with affiliated partnerships.

The Joint Ventures incur capital expenditures primarily related to building improvements for the purpose of maintaining the quality of our properties, and tenant improvements for the purpose of readying our properties for re-leasing. As leases expire, we will work with the Joint Ventures to attempt to re-lease space to an existing tenant or market the space to prospective new tenants. Generally, tenant improvements funded in connection with lease renewals require less capital than those funded in connection with new leases. However, external conditions, such as the supply of and demand for comparable space available within a given market, drive capital costs as well as rental rates.

Operating cash flows, if available, are generally distributed from the Joint Ventures to the Partnership approximately one month following calendar quarter-ends. However, the Joint Ventures will reserve operating distributions, or a portion thereof, as needed in order to fund known capital and other expenditures. Our cash management policy typically includes first utilizing current period operating cash flows until depleted, at which point operating reserves are utilized to fund capital and other required expenditures. In the event that current and prior period accumulated operating cash flows are insufficient to fund such costs, net sale proceeds reserves, if available, would then be utilized. Any capital or other expenditures not funded from the operations of the Joint Ventures will be required to be funded by the Partnership and the other respective joint venture partners on a pro rata basis.

Page 17

As of September 30, 2011, we had received, used, distributed, and held net sale proceeds allocated to the Partnership from the sale of properties as presented below:

	Net Sale Proceeds		Partnership’s Approximate Ownership %		Net Sale Proceeds Allocated to the Partnership		Use of Net Sale Proceeds			Net Sale Proceeds Distributed to Partners as of September 30, 2011		Undistributed Net Sale Proceeds as of September 30, 2011
Property Sold							Amount		Purpose
Cort Building (sold in 2003)	$	5,563,403	24	%	$	1,315,906	$	—	—	$	1,315,906	$	—
Johnson Matthey Building ( sold in 2004)	$	9,675,000	26	%	2,529,819		—		—	2,529,819		—
Alstom Power – Knoxville Building (sold in March 2005)	$	11,646,089	9	%	1,023,528		—		—	1,023,528		—
Gartner Building (sold in April 2005)	$	12,396,859	26	%	3,241,531		340,000		•Partnership operating expenses (2006) •Joint venture operating expenses (2006) •Re-leasing the 20/20 Building (2006) •Re-leasing 111 Southchase Boulevard (2007)	2,901,531		—
1315 West Century Drive (sold in December 2006)	$	8,059,625	9	%	708,328		120,000		•Re-leasing 111 Southchase Boulevard (2007)	588,328		—
Iomega Building (sold in January 2007)	$	4,685,151	9	%	411,759		—		—	411,759		—
111 Southchase Boulevard (sold in May 2007)	$	7,236,841	26	%	1,892,289		665,000		•Re-leasing the 20/20 Building (2007-2008) •Partnership operating expenses (2007-2011) •Capital improvements for the 20/20 Building (2008-2009) •Re-leasing the Avaya Building (2010) •Re-leasing the 360 Interlocken Building (2010-2011)	1,099,128		128,161
Avaya Building (sold in October 2010)	$	5,107,662	9	%	448,892		—			—		448,892
360 Interlocken Building (sold in June 2011)	$	8,685,166	9	%	763,305		—			—		763,305
47300 Kato Road property (sold in August 2011)	$	3,503,755	9	%	330,947		—			—		330,947
Total					$	12,666,304	$	1,125,000		$	9,869,999	$	1,671,305

Upon evaluating the capital needs of our remaining properties in which we currently hold an interest, our General Partners have decided to reserve the remaining net sale proceeds in the near term to fund our pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements for our remaining property.

Results of Operations

Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures

Equity in income (loss) of Joint Ventures increased from $(10,741) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $902 for the three months ending September 30, 2011, primarily due to the gain recognized on the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property, of which approximately $9,000 was allocated to the Partnership.

Equity in income (loss) of Joint Ventures increased from $(128,139) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $101,090 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to (i) the gain recognized on the sale of the 360 Interlocken Building in June 2011, of which approximately $108,000 was allocated to the Partnership, (ii) the gain recognized on the sale of the 47300 Kato Road property in August 2011, of which approximately $9,000 was allocated to the Partnership, and (iii) the impairment

Page 18

loss recognized by Fund IX-X-XI REIT Associates related to the 360 Interlocken Building in the second quarter of 2010, of which approximately $127,000 was allocated to the Partnership.

We expect equity in income (loss) of Joint Ventures to decline in the near term as a result of recognizing nonrecurring gains on the sale of the 360 Interlocken Building in the second quarter of 2011 and the 47300 Kato Road property in the third quarter of 2011.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income increased from $256 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $901 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, and from $762 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $1,823 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are primarily attributable to the increase in the average outstanding cash balance following the receipt of net sale proceeds from the disposition of the Avaya Building in October 2010, the 360 Interlocken Building in June 2011, and the 47300 Kato Road property in August 2011.

Future levels of interest income will be largely dependent on the timing of future property dispositions and net sale proceeds distributions to the limited partners, the amount of operating cash needed to invest in the Joint Ventures related to funding re-leasing costs and capital expenditures, and fluctuations in the average daily yield.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses remained relatively stable at $29,546 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $28,956 for the three months ended September 30, 2011.

General and administrative expenses decreased from $114,694 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $109,899 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to a decrease in the overhead administrative costs allocated to the Partnership during 2011.

We anticipate that future general and administrative expenses will vary primarily based on future changes in our reporting and regulatory requirements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Summary

Our accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies used by the Partnership and the Joint Ventures, which are considered to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Investment in Real Estate Assets

We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the assets to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures’ assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:

Buildings	40 years
Building improvements	5-25 years
Land improvements	20 years
Tenant improvements	Shorter of lease term or economic life

In the event that the Joint Ventures utilize inappropriate useful lives or methods of depreciation, our net income would be misstated.

Page 19

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets

We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which we have an ownership interest through investments in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale, do not exceed the respective assets’ carrying values, we adjust the real estate assets to their respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognize an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value. We have determined that there have been no additional impairments in the carrying value of our real estate assets to date (see below for historical impairments); however, certain of our assets may be carried at an amount more than could be realized in a current disposition transaction.

In the second quarter of 2010, Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates recorded an impairment loss on the 360 Interlocken Building of approximately $1,448,000 (approximately $127,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows primarily due to refining our disposition strategy for the Partnership and, consequently, shortening the estimated holding period of this asset in second quarter of 2010.

In the third quarter of 2009, Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremontrecorded an impairment loss on 47300 Kato Road of approximately $3,316,000 (approximately $313,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows, primarily as a result of shortening the estimated holding period of such asset in third quarter 2009 and significant downward pressure on long-term rental rates for speculative leasing.

In the third quarter of 2008, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates recorded an impairment loss at the 20/20 Building of approximately $3,678,000 (approximately $962,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership) to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value based on the present value of future cash flows, primarily as a result of management refining its strategy for the disposition of this building.

Projections of expected future cash flows require that we estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment, among other factors. The subjectivity of assumptions used in the future cash flow analysis, including discount rates, could result in an incorrect assessment of the property’s future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the misstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Joint Ventures and net income of the Partnership.

Related-Party Transactions

We have entered into agreements with Wells Capital and Wells Management, affiliates of our General Partners, or their affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and expense reimbursements to Wells Capital, Wells Management, or their affiliates for asset management, the management and leasing of our properties; administrative services relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. See Note 4 to our financial statements included in this report for a description of these fees and expense reimbursements we have incurred.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Since we do not borrow any money, make any foreign investments, or invest in any market risk-sensitive instruments, we are not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management's Conclusions Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this report. Based

Page 20

upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are from time to time a party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation the outcome of which would, in management’s judgment based on information currently available, have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, requiring disclosure under Item 103 of Regulation S-K. For a description of pending litigation involving certain related parties, see “Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties” in Note 4 to our financial statements included in this report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) We did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) We did not redeem any securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

(a) We were not subject to any indebtedness and, therefore, did not default with respect to any indebtedness during the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

(b) Not applicable.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a) During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, there was no information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K which was not disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.

(b) Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The Exhibits to this report are set forth on Exhibit Index to Third Quarter Form 10-Q attached hereto.

Page 21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P. (Registrant)
	By:	WELLS PARTNERS, L.P. (General Partner)
	By:	WELLS CAPITAL, INC. (Corporate General Partner)
November 10, 2011		/s/  DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
		Douglas P. Williams
		Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital, Inc.

Page 22

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO THIRD QUARTER FORM 10-Q

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI, L.P.

Exhibit Number		Description
10.1	*	Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of 47300 Kato Road (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
10.2	*	First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
10.3	*	Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
10.4	*	Third Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
10.5	*	Fourth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
10.6	*	Fifth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
10.7	*	Sixth Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Commission File No. 0-23719)
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	**	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

* Previously filed and incorporated herein by reference

** Furnished with this Form 10-Q, but not filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

I, Leo F. Wells, III, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;

1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

3. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the Financial Oversight Committee of the corporate general partner (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

November 10, 2011	By:	/s/  LEO F. WELLS, III
		Leo F. Wells, III Principal Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

I, Douglas P. Williams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the Financial Oversight Committee of the corporate general partner (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

November 10, 2011	By:	/s/  DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
		Douglas P. Williams Principal Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III

Leo F. Wells, III

Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2011

/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS

Douglas P. Williams

Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2011

XML

Balance Sheets Parenthetical	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009
ClassA Limited Partners [Member]
Partners' Capital:
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding	1,430,724	1,430,724	1,431,174
Class B Limited Partners [Member]
Partners' Capital:
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding	222,556	222,556	222,106

XML

Statements of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Equity in Income (Loss) of Joint Ventures	$ 902	$ (10,741)	$ 101,090	$ (128,139)
Interest and Other Income	901	256	1,823	762
General and Administrative Expenses	28,956	29,546	109,899	114,694
Net Income (Loss)	(27,153)	(40,031)	(6,986)	(242,071)
ClassA Limited Partners [Member]
Net Income (Loss)			(74,156)
Net Income (Loss) Allocated to:
Limited Partners	0	(39,087)	(74,156)	(241,127)
Net Income (Loss) per Weighted-Average Limited Partner Unit:
Net Income (Loss) per Weighted-Average Limited Partner Unit	$ 0.00	$ (0.03)	$ (0.05)	$ (0.17)
Weighted-Average Limited Partner Units Outstanding:
Weighted-Average Limited Partner Units Outstanding	1,430,724	1,430,724	1,430,724	1,431,024
Class B Limited Partners [Member]
Net Income (Loss)			67,170
Net Income (Loss) Allocated to:
Limited Partners	(27,153)	(944)	67,170	(944)
Net Income (Loss) per Weighted-Average Limited Partner Unit:
Net Income (Loss) per Weighted-Average Limited Partner Unit	$ (0.12)	$ 0.00	$ 0.30	$ 0.00
Weighted-Average Limited Partner Units Outstanding:
Weighted-Average Limited Partner Units Outstanding	222,556	222,556	222,556	222,256
General Partner [Member]
Net Income (Loss)			0
Net Income (Loss) Allocated to:
General Partners	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XI L P
Entity Central Index Key	0001018216
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	0

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Partnership and its General Partners are parties to legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of our business. The Partnership is not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have a materially adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Partnership, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to fairly and consistently present the results for such periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Investment in Joint Ventures

The Partnership has evaluated the Joint Ventures and concluded that none are variable interest entities. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture partners is required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint Ventures, or their real property investments. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Joint Ventures using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income (loss) and distributions are allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, are generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets

The Partnership continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned through the Partnership’s investment in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present, which suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to their respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value.

While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as little, if any, related market activity or information is available. Examples of Level 3 inputs include estimated holding periods, discount rates, market capitalization rates, expected lease rental rates, timing of new leases, and sales prices; additionally, the Partnership may assign an estimated probability-weighting to more than one fair value estimate based on the Partnership’s assessment of the likelihood of the respective underlying assumptions occurring as of the evaluation date. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Distributions of Net Cash from Operations

Net cash from operations, if available and unless reserved, is generally distributed quarterly to the limited partners as follows:

• First, to all limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis until such limited partners have received distributions equal to a 10% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined.

• Second, to the General Partners until the General Partners have received distributions equal to 10% of the total cumulative distributions paid by the Partnership.

• Third, to the limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis and the General Partners allocated on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.

No distributions of net cash from operations will be made to limited partners holding Class B Units.

Distribution of Net Sale Proceeds

Upon sales of properties, unless reserved, net sale proceeds will be distributed in the following order:

• In the event that the particular property sold is sold for a price that is less than its original property purchase price, to the limited partners holding Class A Units until they have received an amount equal to the excess of the original property purchase price over the price for which the property was sold, limited to the amount of depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery deductions taken by the limited partners holding Class B Units with respect to such property;

• To limited partners holding units which at any time have been treated as Class B Units until the limited partners have received an amount necessary to equal the net cash from operations previously distributed to the limited partners holding Class A Units on a per-unit basis;

• To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received 100% of their respective net capital contributions, as defined;

• To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received a cumulative 10% per annum return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined;

• To limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their respective preferential limited partner return (defined as the sum of a 10% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Class A Units and a 15% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Class B Units);

• To the General Partners until they have received 100% of their capital contributions, as defined;

• Then, if limited partners have received any excess limited partner distributions (defined as distributions to limited partners over the life of their investment in the Partnership in excess of their net capital contributions, as defined, plus their preferential limited partner return), to the General Partners until they have received distributions equal to 20% of the sum of any such excess limited partner distributions plus distributions made to the General Partners pursuant to this provision; and

• Thereafter, 80% to the limited partners on a per-unit basis and 20% to the General Partners.

Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale

For the purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery and the gain on the sale of assets. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportion that net cash from operations is distributed to the partners holding Class A Units and the General Partners. To the extent the Partnership’s net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, such excess net income will be allocated 99% to the limited partners holding Class A Units and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero, (b) then, to any partner having a positive balance in his capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance, and (c) thereafter, to the General Partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnership’s properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to the qualified income offset provisions of the partnership agreement, (b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero, and (c) allocations to limited partners holding Class B Units in amounts equal to the deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) clarified previously issued GAAP and issued new requirements related to Accounting Standards Codification Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASU 2010-6”). The clarification component includes disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used in determining fair value, and providing fair value measurement information for each class of assets and liabilities. The new requirements relate to disclosures of transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy, as well as the individual components in the rollforward of the lowest level (Level 3) in the fair value hierarchy. This change in GAAP became effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2010, except for the provision concerning the rollforward of activity of the Level 3 fair value measurement, which became effective for the Partnership on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-6 has not had a material impact on the Partnership's financial statements or disclosures.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement Topic Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 converges the GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards definition of “fair value,” the requirements for measuring amounts at fair value, and disclosures about these measurements. The update does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 will be effective for the Partnership on December 15, 2011. The Partnership does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have a material impact on its financial statements or disclosures.

XML

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$ (6,986)	$ (242,071)
Operating distributions received from joint ventures	96,588	108,736
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Equity in (income) loss of joint ventures	(101,090)	128,139
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets	(2,444)	0
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses	(6,648)	(2,973)
Decrease in due to affiliates	(494)	(1,445)
Net cash used in operating activities	(21,074)	(9,614)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net sale proceeds recieved from joint ventures	1,094,252	0
Investment in joint ventures	(73,467)	(21,141)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1,020,785	(21,141)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	999,711	(30,755)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period	704,810	449,194
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$ 1,704,521	$ 418,439

XML

Investment in Joint Ventures

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]

Equity Method Investments Disclosure [Text Block]

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES

Summary of Financial Information

Condensed financial information for the joint ventures in which the Partnership held direct interests for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is presented below:

	Total Revenues				Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010			2011			2010
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates	$	—	$	—	$	(4,042	)	$	(2,431	)	$	3,397	$	(15,902	)	$	(645	)	$	(18,333	)
Fund X-XI Associates	—		—		12,761			(20,763		)	—		—			12,761			(20,763		)
Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates	344,908		337,406		(16,823		)	(1,576		)	—		—			(16,823		)	(1,576		)
	$	344,908	$	337,406	$	(8,104	)	$	(24,770	)	$	3,397	$	(15,902	)	$	(4,707	)	$	(40,672	)

	Total Revenues				Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended						Nine Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010			2011			2010
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates	$	—	$	—	$	(24,668	)	$	(15,561	)	$	1,354,512	$	(1,474,622	)	$	1,329,844		$	(1,490,183	)
Fund X-XI Associates	—		—		(17,044		)	27,313			—		—			(17,044		)	27,313
Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates	911,978		885,383		(32,996		)	(33,048		)	—		—			(32,996		)	(33,048		)
	$	911,978	$	885,383	$	(74,708	)	$	(21,296	)	$	1,354,512	$	(1,474,622	)	$	1,279,804		$	(1,495,918	)

Condensed financial information for the joint venture in which the Partnership held an interest through its equity interest in Fund X-XI Associates for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is presented below:

	Total Revenues				Loss From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010			2011		2010
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates – Fremont	$	—	$	—	$	(2,855	)	$	(2,432	)	$	59,582	$	(89,864	)	$	56,727	$	(92,296	)

	Total Revenues				Loss From Continuing Operations						Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations					Net Income (Loss)
	Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended						Nine Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011			2010		2011			2010
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates – Fremont	$	—	$	—	$	(14,269	)	$	(13,322	)	$	(61,494	)	$	134,735	$	(75,763	)	$	121,413

The Partnership allocates its share of net income, net loss, and gain on sale generated by the properties owned by the Joint Ventures to its Class A and Class B limited partners pursuant to the partnership agreement provisions outlined in Note 2. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations recognized by the Joint Ventures are provided below:

	Nine Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011								September 30, 2010
	Operating Income (Loss)			Gain on Sale		Total			Operating Income (Loss)			Impairment Loss			Gain on Sale		Total
Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates	$	127,569		$	1,226,943	$	1,354,512		$	(26,405	)	$	(1,448,217	)	$	—	$	(1,474,622	)
Fund X-XI-REIT Associates – Fremont	(152,699		)	91,205		(61,494		)	134,735			—			—		134,735
	$	(25,130	)	$	1,318,148	$	1,293,018		$	108,330		$	(1,448,217	)	$	—	$	(1,339,887	)

Due from Joint Ventures

As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due from joint ventures as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represents operating cash flow generated by Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is attributable to the Partnership.

XML

Related-Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Management and Leasing Fees

The Partnership entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnership’s properties owned through the Joint Ventures, equal to (a) 2.5% for management services and 2% for leasing services of the gross revenues collected monthly (aggregate maximum of 4.5%), plus a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) in the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, are included in equity in income (loss) of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. The Partnership’s share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures and payable to Wells Management is $568 and $1,523 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $2,215 and $3,644 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, one of the Partnership’s General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. The Partnership incurred administrative expenses of $16,711 and $18,591 payable to Wells Capital and Wells Management for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $47,744 and $58,061 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In addition, Wells Capital and Wells Management pay for certain operating expenses of the Partnership (“bill-backs”) directly and invoice the Partnership for the reimbursement thereof on a quarterly basis. As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliates as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represents administrative reimbursements and bill-backs due to Wells Capital and/or Wells Management.

Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT filed a putative class action and derivative complaint, presently styled In re Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Securities Litigation, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against, among others, Piedmont REIT; Leo F. Wells, III, one of the Partnership's General Partners; Wells Capital, the corporate general partner of Wells Partners, the Partnership's other General Partner; Wells Management, the Partnership's property manager; certain affiliates of WREF; the directors of Piedmont REIT; and certain individuals who formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT prior to the closing of the internalization transaction on April 16, 2007.

The complaint alleged, among other things, violations of the federal proxy rules and breaches of fiduciary duty arising from the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction and the related proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as amended. The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and nullification of the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction.

On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which attempted to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who received and were entitled to vote on the Piedmont REIT proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, and derivative claims on behalf of Piedmont REIT.

On March 31, 2008, the Court granted in part the defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Court dismissed five of the seven counts of the amended complaint in their entirety. The Court dismissed the remaining two counts with the exception of allegations regarding the failure to disclose in the Piedmont REIT proxy statement details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. On April 21, 2008, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which alleges violations of the federal proxy rules based upon allegations that the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction omitted details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT.  The second amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified monetary damages, to nullify and rescind the internalization transaction, and to cancel and rescind any stock issued to the defendants as consideration for the internalization transaction. On May 12, 2008, the defendants answered and raised certain defenses to the second amended complaint.

On June 23, 2008, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. On September 16, 2009, the Court granted the plaintiff's motion for class certification. On September 20, 2009, the defendants filed a petition for permission to appeal immediately the Court's order granting the motion for class certification with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The petition for permission to appeal was denied on October 30, 2009. On April 13, 2009, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend the second amended complaint to add additional defendants. The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend on June 23, 2009.

On December 4, 2009, the parties filed motions for summary judgment. On August 2, 2010, the Court entered an order denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment and granting, in part, the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The Court ruled that the question of whether certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT constituted “material” information required to be disclosed in the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction raises questions of fact that must be determined at trial. A trial date has not been set.

Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, and Wells Management believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this action. Any financial loss incurred by Wells Capital, Wells Management, or their affiliates could hinder their ability to successfully manage the Partnership's operations and portfolio of investments.

XML

Economic Dependency

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY [Abstract]

Economic Dependency [Text Block]

ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY

The Partnership has engaged Wells Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services, including supervision of the management and leasing of its properties, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities, including accounting services and investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days’ written notice. As a result of these relationships, the Partnership is dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.

Wells Capital, Wells Management, and Wells Investment Securities, Inc. ("WIS") are owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of Wells Capital, Wells Management, and WIS represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, the Partnership focuses on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF were to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, the Partnership might be required to find alternative service providers.

Future net income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital, Wells Management, and WIS based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored programs and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by WREF-sponsored programs, as well as distribution income earned from its holdings of common stock of Piedmont REIT, which was acquired in connection with the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction (see “Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties” above). As of September 30, 2011, the Partnership has no reason to believe that WREF does not have access to adequate liquidity and capital resources, including cash flow generated from operations, cash on hand, other investments, and borrowing capacity, necessary to meet its current and future obligations as they become due.

The Partnership is also dependent upon the ability of its current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as they become due. The inability of a tenant to pay future rental amounts would be likely to have a negative impact on the Partnership’s results of operations. The Partnership is not currently aware of any reason why its existing tenants should not be able to pay their contractual rental amounts as they become due in all material respects. Situations preventing the tenants from paying contractual rents could result in a material adverse impact on the Partnership’s results of operations.

XML

Statements of Partners' Capital (USD $)	Total	ClassA Limited Partners [Member]	Class B Limited Partners [Member]	General Partner [Member]
Partners' Capital, beginning of period at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 3,204,434	$ 3,204,434	$ 0	$ 0
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding, beginning of period at Dec. 31, 2009		1,431,174	222,106
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Class A conversion elections, units		(450)	450
Class A conversion elections, amounts		(944)	944
Net Income (Loss)	(248,591)	(251,274)	2,683	0
Partners' Capital, end of period at Dec. 31, 2010	2,955,843	2,952,216	3,627	0
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding, end of period at Dec. 31, 2010		1,430,724	222,556
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Net Income (Loss)	(6,986)	(74,156)	67,170	0
Partners' Capital, end of period at Sep. 30, 2011	$ 2,948,857	$ 2,878,060	$ 70,797	$ 0
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding, end of period at Sep. 30, 2011		1,430,724	222,556

XML

Organization and Business

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. (“Wells Partners”), a Georgia nonpublic limited partnership, serving as its general partners (collectively, the “General Partners”). Wells Capital, Inc. (“Wells Capital”) serves as the corporate general partner of Wells Partners. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. (“WREF”). Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the president, sole director, and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership was formed on June 20, 1996 for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription, limited partners elected to have their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units. Limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units one time during each quarterly accounting period. Limited partners may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; and (c) add or remove a general partner. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights regardless of class.

On December 31, 1997, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $35,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The offering was terminated on December 30, 1998, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 1,302,942 Class A Units and 350,338 Class B Units representing total limited partner capital contributions of $16,532,802.

The Partnership owns indirect interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP (“Piedmont OP”), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (“Piedmont REIT”), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the “Joint Ventures”) and properties:

Joint Venture	Joint Venture Partners	Ownership %	Properties
The Fund IX, Fund X, Fund XI and REIT Joint Venture (“Fund IX-X-XI-REIT Associates”)	• Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. • Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP	39.0% 48.5% 8.8% 3.7%	1. 360 Interlocken Building(1) A three-story office building located in Broomfield, Colorado 2. Avaya Building(2) A one-story office building located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Fund X and Fund XI Associates (“Fund X-XI Associates”)	• Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.	58.0% 42.0%	This joint venture only owns an interest in another joint venture, Wells/Fremont Associates, and does not own any properties directly.
Wells/Fremont Associates (“Fund X-XI-REIT Associates - Fremont”)	• Fund X-XI Associates • Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP	22.5% 77.5%	3. 47300 Kato Road(3)  A two-story warehouse and office building located in Fremont, California
The Wells Fund XI-Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture (“Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates”)	• Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. • Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. • Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP	26.1% 17.1% 56.8%	4. 20/20 Building A three-story office building located in Leawood, Kansas

⁽¹⁾  This property was sold in June 2011.

⁽²⁾  This property was sold in October 2010.

⁽³⁾  This property was sold in August 2011.

Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P., Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P., and Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. are affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis. For further information regarding the Joint Ventures and foregoing properties, refer to the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

XML

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Assets:
Investment in joint ventures	$ 1,236,672	$ 2,239,616
Cash and cash equivalents	1,704,521	704,810
Due from joint ventures	13,621	26,960
Other assets	2,444	0
Total assets	2,957,258	2,971,386
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	2,477	9,125
Due to affiliates	5,924	6,418
Total liabilities	8,401	15,543
Commitments and Contingencies
Partners' Capital:
Total partners’ capital	2,948,857	2,955,843
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	2,957,258	2,971,386
ClassA Limited Partners [Member]
Partners' Capital:
Limited Partners	2,878,060	2,952,216
Total partners’ capital	2,878,060	2,952,216
Class B Limited Partners [Member]
Partners' Capital:
Limited Partners	70,797	3,627
Total partners’ capital	70,797	3,627
General Partner [Member]
Partners' Capital:
General Partners	0	0
Total partners’ capital	$ 0	$ 0