XML 81 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements [Text Block]
Fair Value Measurements
 Fair Values - Recurring
The following tables present assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by fair value hierarchy level.
 
September 30, 2013
(In millions)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Collateral
 
Total
Derivative instruments, assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Commodity
$

 
$
5

 
$

 
$

 
$
5

     Interest rate

 
11

 

 

 
11

     Foreign currency

 
1

 

 

 
1

          Derivative instruments, assets
$

 
$
17

 
$

 
$

 
$
17

Derivative instruments, liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Commodity
$

 
$
14

 
$

 
$

 
$
14

     Foreign currency

 
14

 

 

 
14

          Derivative instruments, liabilities
$

 
$
28

 
$

 
$

 
$
28


 
December 31, 2012
(In millions)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Collateral
 
Total
Derivative instruments, assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity
$

 
$
52

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
53

Interest rate

 
21

 

 

 
21

Foreign currency

 
18

 

 

 
18

Derivative instruments, assets
$

 
$
91

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
92


Commodity swaps in Level 2 are measured at fair value with a market approach using prices obtained from exchanges or pricing services, which have been corroborated with data from active markets for similar assets or liabilities.  Commodity options in Level 2 are valued using the Black-Scholes Model.  Inputs to this model include prices as noted above, discount factors, and implied market volatility.  The inputs to this fair value measurement are categorized as Level 2 because predominantly all assumptions and inputs are observable in active markets throughout the term of the instruments.  Collateral deposits related to commodity derivatives are in broker accounts covered by master netting agreements.
Interest rate swaps are measured at fair value with a market approach using actionable broker quotes which are Level 2 inputs.  Foreign currency forwards are measured at fair value with a market approach using third-party pricing services, such as Bloomberg L.P., which have been corroborated with data from active markets for similar assets or liabilities, and are Level 2 inputs.
Fair Values - Nonrecurring
The following table shows the values of assets, by major category, measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
(In millions)
Fair Value
 
Impairment
 
Fair Value
 
Impairment
Long-lived assets held for use
$
5

 
$
11

 
$
2

 
$
8

 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
(In millions)
Fair Value
 
Impairment
 
Fair Value
 
Impairment
Long-lived assets held for use
$
5

 
$
49

 
$
77

 
$
271



All long-lived assets held for use that were impaired in the first nine months of 2013 and 2012 were held by our North America E&P segment. The fair values of each discussed below were measured using an income approach based upon internal estimates of future production levels, prices and discount rate, all of which are Level 3 inputs.  Inputs to the fair value measurement included reserve and production estimates made by our reservoir engineers, estimated commodity prices adjusted for quality and location differentials, and forecasted operating expenses for the remaining estimated life of the reservoir.
In the first quarter of 2013, as a result of our decision to wind down operations in the Powder River Basin due to poor economics, an impairment of $15 million was recorded.
In early 2012, production rates from the Ozona development in the Gulf of Mexico declined significantly. Accordingly, our reserve engineers prepared evaluations of our future production as well as our reserves and an impairment of $261 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2012.  As the development produced towards abandonment pressures, further downward revisions of reserves were taken, resulting in an additional impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012. Ozona production ceased in the first quarter of 2013 and an additional $21 million impairment was recorded.
Other impairments of long-lived assets held for use by our North America E&P segment in the first nine months of 2013 and 2012 were a result of reduced drilling expectations, reductions of estimated reserves or declining natural gas prices.
Fair Values – Financial Instruments
Our current assets and liabilities include financial instruments, the most significant of which are receivables, commercial paper and payables. We believe the carrying values of our receivables, commercial paper and payables approximate fair value. Our fair value assessment incorporates a variety of considerations, including (1) the short-term duration of the instruments, (2) our investment-grade credit rating, and (3) our historical incurrence of and expected future insignificance of bad debt expense, which includes an evaluation of counterparty credit risk.
The following table summarizes financial instruments, excluding receivables, commercial paper, payables and derivative financial instruments, and their reported fair value by individual balance sheet line item at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Fair
 
Carrying
 
Fair
 
Carrying
(In millions)
Value
 
Amount
 
Value
 
Amount
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other noncurrent assets
$
168

 
$
165

 
$
189

 
$
186

Total financial assets  
168

 
165

 
189

 
186

Financial liabilities
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

     Other current liabilities
13

 
13

 
13

 
13

     Long-term debt, including current portion(a)
6,941

 
6,461

 
7,610

 
6,642

Deferred credits and other liabilities
164

 
161

 
94

 
94

Total financial liabilities  
$
7,118

 
$
6,635

 
$
7,717

 
$
6,749

(a)      Excludes capital leases.
Fair values of our financial assets included in other noncurrent assets, and of our financial liabilities included in other current liabilities and deferred credits and other liabilities are measured using an income approach and most inputs are internally generated, which results in a Level 3 classification. Estimated future cash flows are discounted using a rate deemed appropriate to obtain the fair value.
Most of our long-term debt instruments are publicly-traded. A market approach, based upon quotes from major financial institutions, is used to measure the fair value of such debt. Because these quotes cannot be independently verified to an active market they are considered Level 3 inputs. The fair value of our debt that is not publicly-traded is measured using an income approach. The future debt service payments are discounted using the rate at which we currently expect to borrow. All inputs to this calculation are Level 3.