XML 34 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Regulatory Requirements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Regulatory Capital Requirements [Abstract]  
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Broker-Dealer Capital Requirements
The Company’s U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule (the "Rule") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 administered by the SEC and FINRA, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. The minimum net capital requirements can be met under either the Aggregate Indebtedness method or the Alternative method. Under the Aggregate Indebtedness method, a broker-dealer is required to maintain minimum net capital of the greater of 6 2/3% of its aggregate indebtedness, as defined, or a minimum dollar amount. Under the Alternative method, a broker-dealer is required to maintain net capital equal to the greater of $250,000 or 2% of aggregate debit balances arising from customer transactions. The method used depends on the individual U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary. The Company’s other broker-dealers, including its international broker-dealer subsidiaries, are subject to capital requirements determined by their respective regulators.    
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, all of the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries met minimum net capital requirements. The tables below summarize the minimum capital requirements and excess capital for the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions):
 
Required Net
Capital
 
Net Capital
 
Excess Net
Capital
March 31, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
E*TRADE Clearing(1)(2)
$
139

 
$
911

 
$
772

E*TRADE Securities(1)(3)

 
59

 
59

Other broker-dealers

 
11

 
11

Total
$
139

 
$
981

 
$
842

December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
E*TRADE Clearing(1)
$
161

 
$
1,007

 
$
846

E*TRADE Securities(1)

 
49

 
49

Other broker-dealers
1

 
15

 
14

Total
$
162

 
$
1,071

 
$
909

 
(1)
Elected to use the Alternative method to compute net capital. The net capital requirement was $250,000 for E*TRADE Securities for both periods presented.
(2)
E*TRADE Clearing paid a dividend of $124 million to the parent company during the first quarter of 2016 and $75 million in April 2016.
(3)
E*TRADE Securities paid a dividend of $24 million to the parent company during the first quarter of 2016 and $27 million in April 2016.
Bank Capital Requirements
E*TRADE Financial and E*TRADE Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Beginning January 1, 2015, both E*TRADE Financial and E*TRADE Bank calculate regulatory capital under the Basel III framework using the Standardized Approach, subject to transition provisions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can trigger certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on E*TRADE Financial’s and E*TRADE Bank’s financial condition and results of operations. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, E*TRADE Financial and E*TRADE Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. In addition, E*TRADE Bank may not pay dividends to the parent company without the non-objection, or in certain cases the approval, of its regulators, and any loans by E*TRADE Bank to the parent company and its other non-bank subsidiaries are subject to various quantitative, arm’s length, collateralization and other requirements. E*TRADE Financial’s and E*TRADE Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require E*TRADE Financial and E*TRADE Bank to meet minimum Common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, Total risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios. Events beyond management's control, such as deterioration in credit markets, could adversely affect future earnings and E*TRADE Financial’s and E*TRADE Bank’s ability to meet future capital requirements and, in the case of E*TRADE Bank, its ability to pay dividends to the parent company. E*TRADE Financial and E*TRADE Bank were categorized as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action for the periods presented in the table below (dollars in millions):
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Actual
 
Well Capitalized Minimum Capital
 
Excess Capital
 
Actual
 
Well Capitalized Minimum Capital
 
Excess Capital
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
E*TRADE Financial:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 leverage
$
3,410

 
7.8
%
 
$
2,177

 
5.0
%
 
$
1,233

 
$
3,747

 
9.0
%
 
$
2,093

 
5.0
%
 
$
1,654

Common equity Tier 1 capital
$
3,410

 
34.5
%
 
$
642

 
6.5
%
 
$
2,768

 
$
3,747

 
39.3
%
 
$
620

 
6.5
%
 
$
3,127

Tier 1 risk-based capital
$
3,410

 
34.5
%
 
$
791

 
8.0
%
 
$
2,619

 
$
3,747

 
39.3
%
 
$
763

 
8.0
%
 
$
2,984

Total risk-based capital
$
3,956

 
40.0
%
 
$
988

 
10.0
%
 
$
2,968

 
$
4,186

 
43.9
%
 
$
954

 
10.0
%
 
$
3,232

 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Actual
 
Well Capitalized Minimum Capital
 
Excess Capital
 
Actual
 
Well Capitalized Minimum Capital
 
Excess Capital
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
E*TRADE Bank(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 leverage
$
2,895

 
8.6
%
 
$
1,691

 
5.0
%
 
$
1,204

 
$
3,075

 
9.7
%
 
$
1,579

 
5.0
%
 
$
1,496

Common equity Tier 1 capital
$
2,895

 
33.3
%
 
$
565

 
6.5
%
 
$
2,330

 
$
3,075

 
36.5
%
 
$
548

 
6.5
%
 
$
2,527

Tier 1 risk-based capital
$
2,895

 
33.3
%
 
$
696

 
8.0
%
 
$
2,199

 
$
3,075

 
36.5
%
 
$
674

 
8.0
%
 
$
2,401

Total risk-based capital
$
3,009

 
34.6
%
 
$
869

 
10.0
%
 
$
2,140

 
$
3,185

 
37.8
%
 
$
842

 
10.0
%
 
$
2,343


(1)
E*TRADE Bank paid $248 million in dividends to the parent company during the first quarter of 2016.