XML 26 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Loans Receivable, Net
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Loans and Leases Receivable Disclosure [Abstract]  
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
Loans receivable, net at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions): 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
One- to four-family
$
2,370

 
$
2,488

Home equity
1,974

 
2,114

Consumer and other
317

 
341

Total loans receivable
4,661

 
4,943

Unamortized premiums, net
21

 
23

Allowance for loan losses
(322
)
 
(353
)
Total loans receivable, net
$
4,360

 
$
4,613


At March 31, 2016, the Company pledged $3.9 billion and $0.3 billion of loans as collateral to the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank, respectively. At December 31, 2015, the Company pledged $4.2 billion and $0.3 billion of loans as collateral to the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank, respectively.
The following table presents the total recorded investment in loans receivable and allowance for loan losses by loans that have been collectively evaluated for impairment and those that have been individually evaluated for impairment by loan class at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Recorded Investment
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
2,109

 
$
2,219

 
$
41

 
$
31

Home equity
1,767

 
1,915

 
217

 
255

Consumer and other
320

 
344

 
6

 
6

Total collectively evaluated for impairment
4,196

 
4,478

 
264

 
292

Individually evaluated for impairment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
277

 
286

 
8

 
9

Home equity
209

 
202

 
50

 
52

Total individually evaluated for impairment
486

 
488

 
58

 
61

Total
$
4,682

 
$
4,966

 
$
322

 
$
353


Credit Quality and Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company tracks and reviews factors to predict and monitor credit risk in its mortgage loan portfolio on an ongoing basis. These factors include: loan type, estimated current LTV/CLTV ratios, delinquency history, borrowers’ current credit scores, housing prices, loan vintage and geographic location of the property. The Company believes LTV/CLTV ratios and credit scores are the key factors in determining future loan performance. The factors are updated on at least a quarterly basis. The Company tracks and reviews delinquency status to predict and monitor credit risk in the consumer and other loan portfolio on at least a quarterly basis.
Credit Quality
The following tables show the distribution of the Company’s mortgage loan portfolios by credit quality indicator at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
One- to Four-Family
 
Home Equity
Current LTV/CLTV (1)
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
<=80%
$
1,482

 
$
1,519

 
$
802

 
$
843

80%-100%
560

 
609

 
507

 
549

100%-120%
206

 
227

 
387

 
420

>120%
122

 
133

 
278

 
302

Total mortgage loans receivable
$
2,370

 
$
2,488

 
$
1,974

 
$
2,114

Average estimated current LTV/CLTV (2)
76
%
 
77
%
 
90
%
 
90
%
Average LTV/CLTV at loan origination (3)
71
%
 
71
%
 
81
%
 
81
%
 
(1)
Current CLTV calculations for home equity loans are based on the maximum available line for home equity lines of credit and outstanding principal balance for home equity installment loans. For home equity loans in the second lien position, the original balance of the first lien loan at origination date and updated valuations on the property underlying the loan are used to calculate CLTV. Current property values are updated on a quarterly basis using the most recent property value data available to the Company. For properties in which the Company did not have an updated valuation, home price indices were utilized to estimate the current property value.
(2)
The average estimated current LTV/CLTV ratio reflects the outstanding balance at the balance sheet date and the maximum available line for home equity lines of credit, divided by the estimated current value of the underlying property.
(3)
Average LTV/CLTV at loan origination calculations are based on LTV/CLTV at time of purchase for one- to four-family purchased loans and home equity installment loans and maximum available line for home equity lines of credit.
 
One- to Four-Family
 
Home Equity
Current FICO (1)
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
>=720
$
1,357

 
$
1,423

 
$
994

 
$
1,069

719 - 700
219

 
246

 
201

 
222

699 - 680
195

 
198

 
177

 
183

679 - 660
163

 
150

 
144

 
152

659 - 620
167

 
198

 
196

 
203

<620
269

 
273

 
262

 
285

Total mortgage loans receivable
$
2,370

 
$
2,488

 
$
1,974

 
$
2,114

(1)
FICO scores are updated on a quarterly basis; however, there were approximately $37 million and $39 million of one- to four-family loans at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and $3 million of home equity loans at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for which the updated FICO scores were not available. For these loans, the current FICO distribution included the most recent FICO scores where available, otherwise the original FICO score was used.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
One- to four-family loans include loans for a five to ten year interest-only period, followed by an amortizing period ranging from 20 to 25 years. At March 31, 2016, 38% of the Company's one- to four-family portfolio was not yet amortizing. During the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2016, borrowers of approximately 17% of the portfolio made voluntary annual principal payments of at least $2,500 and of this population, nearly half made principal payments that were $10,000 or greater.
The home equity loan portfolio is primarily second lien loans on residential real estate properties, which have a higher level of credit risk than first lien mortgage loans. Approximately 13% of the home equity portfolio was in the first lien position and the Company holds both the first and second lien positions in less than 1% of the home equity loan portfolio at March 31, 2016. The home equity loan portfolio consists of approximately 18% of home equity installment loans and approximately 82% of home equity lines of credit at March 31, 2016. Of the home equity lines of credit, approximately 53% had converted to amortizing loans at March 31, 2016.
Home equity installment loans are primarily fixed rate and fixed term, fully amortizing loans that do not offer the option of an interest-only payment. The majority of home equity lines of credit convert to amortizing loans at the end of the draw period, which typically ranges from five to ten years. Approximately 3% of this portfolio will require the borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period. At March 31, 2016, 47% of the home equity line of credit portfolio had not converted from the interest-only draw period and had not begun amortizing. During the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2016, borrowers of approximately 40% of the portfolio made annual principal payments of at least $500 on their home equity lines of credit and slightly under half reduced their principal balance by at least $2,500.
The following table outlines when one- to four-family and home equity lines of credit convert to amortizing by percentage of the one- to four-family portfolio and home equity line of credit portfolios, respectively, at March 31, 2016:
Period of Conversion to Amortizing Loan
% of One- to Four-Family
Portfolio
 
% of Home Equity Line of 
Credit Portfolio
Already amortizing
62%
 
53%
Through December 31, 2016
15%
 
32%
Year ending December 31, 2017
23%
 
14%
Year ending December 31, 2018 or later
—%
 
1%

The average age of our mortgage loans receivable was 10.1 and 9.9 years at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Approximately 37% of the Company’s mortgage loans receivable were concentrated in California at both March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. No other state had concentrations of mortgage loans that represented 10% or more of the Company’s mortgage loans receivable at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Delinquent Loans
The following table shows total loans receivable by delinquency category at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Current
 
30-89 Days
Delinquent
 
90-179 Days
Delinquent
 
180+ Days
Delinquent
 
Total
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
2,160

 
$
74

 
$
28

 
$
108

 
$
2,370

Home equity
1,839

 
52

 
28

 
55

 
1,974

Consumer and other
311

 
5

 
1

 

 
317

Total loans receivable
$
4,310

 
$
131

 
$
57

 
$
163

 
$
4,661

December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
2,279

 
$
72

 
$
26

 
$
111

 
$
2,488

Home equity
1,978

 
52

 
31

 
53

 
2,114

Consumer and other
334

 
6

 
1

 

 
341

Total loans receivable
$
4,591

 
$
130

 
$
58

 
$
164

 
$
4,943


Loans delinquent 180 days and greater have been written down to their expected recovery value. Loans delinquent 90 to 179 days generally have not been written down to their expected recovery value (unless they are in process of bankruptcy or are modifications for which there is substantial doubt as to the borrower’s ability to repay the loan), but present a risk of future charge-off. Additional charge-offs on loans delinquent 180 days and greater are possible if home prices decline beyond current expectations.
The Company monitors loans in which a borrower’s current credit history casts doubt on their ability to repay a loan. Loans are classified as special mention when they are between 30 and 89 days past due. The trend in special mention loan balances is generally indicative of the expected trend for charge-offs in future periods, as these loans have a greater propensity to migrate into nonaccrual status and ultimately charge-off. One- to four-family loans are generally secured in a first lien position by real estate assets, reducing the potential loss when compared to an unsecured loan. Home equity loans are generally secured by real estate assets; however, the majority of these loans are secured in a second lien position, which substantially increases the potential loss when compared to a first lien position. The loss severity of our second lien home equity loans was approximately 94% for three months ended March 31, 2016.
Nonperforming Loans
The Company classifies loans as nonperforming when they are no longer accruing interest, which includes loans that are 90 days and greater past due, TDRs that are on nonaccrual status for all classes of loans (including loans in bankruptcy) and certain junior liens that have a delinquent senior lien. The following table shows the comparative data for nonperforming loans at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions):
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
One- to four-family
$
259

 
$
263

Home equity
165

 
154

Consumer and other
1

 
1

Total nonperforming loans receivable
$
425

 
$
418


Real Estate Owned and Loans with Formal Foreclosure Proceedings in Process
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company held $26 million and $27 million, respectively, of real estate owned that were acquired through foreclosure or through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. The Company also held $99 million and $108 million of loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table provides a roll forward by loan portfolio of the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
One- to
Four-Family
 
Home
Equity
 
Consumer
and Other
 
Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
$
40

 
$
307

 
$
6

 
$
353

Provision (benefit) for loan losses
8

 
(42
)
 

 
(34
)
Charge-offs
(1
)
 
(5
)
 
(2
)
 
(8
)
Recoveries(1)
2

 
7

 
2

 
11

Charge-offs, net
1

 
2

 

 
3

Allowance for loan losses, end of period
$
49

 
$
267

 
$
6

 
$
322

 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
One- to
Four-Family
 
Home
Equity
 
Consumer
and Other
 
Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
$
27

 
$
367

 
$
10

 
$
404

Provision (benefit) for loan losses
5

 
(2
)
 
2

 
5

Charge-offs
(1
)
 
(10
)
 
(3
)
 
(14
)
Recoveries

 
5

 
2

 
7

Charge-offs, net
(1
)
 
(5
)
 
(1
)
 
(7
)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period
$
31

 
$
360

 
$
11

 
$
402

(1)
Includes a one-time payment from a third party mortgage originator of $3 million to satisfy in full all pending and future repurchase requests with them for the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Total loans receivable designated as held-for-investment decreased $0.3 billion during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The allowance for loan losses was $322 million, or 6.9% of total loans receivable, as of March 31, 2016 compared to $353 million, or 7.1% of total loans receivable, as of December 31, 2015.
Impaired Loans—Troubled Debt Restructurings
TDRs include two categories of loans: (1) loan modifications completed under the Company’s programs that involve granting an economic concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, and (2) loans that have been charged off based on the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs due to bankruptcy notification.
Delinquency status is the primary measure the Company uses to evaluate the performance of loans modified as TDRs. As mentioned above, the Company classifies loans as nonperforming when they are no longer accruing interest, which includes loans that are 90 days and greater past due, TDRs that are on nonaccrual status for all classes of loans, including loans in bankruptcy, and certain junior liens that have a delinquent senior lien. The following table shows a summary of the Company’s recorded investment in TDRs that were on accrual and nonaccrual status, further disaggregated by delinquency status, in addition to the recorded investment in TDRs at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions):
  
 
 
Nonaccrual TDRs
 
 
 
Accrual 
TDRs(1)
 
Current(2)
 
30-89 Days
Delinquent
 
90-179 Days
Delinquent
 
180+ Days
Delinquent
 
Total Recorded
Investment in 
TDRs (3)(4)
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
105

 
$
104

 
$
19

 
$
6

 
$
43

 
$
277

Home equity
114

 
53

 
12

 
7

 
23

 
209

Total
$
219

 
$
157

 
$
31

 
$
13

 
$
66

 
$
486

December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
106

 
$
106

 
$
19

 
$
8

 
$
47

 
$
286

Home equity
120

 
42

 
11

 
8

 
21

 
202

Total
$
226

 
$
148

 
$
30

 
$
16

 
$
68

 
$
488

(1)
Represents loans modified as TDRs that are current and have made six or more consecutive payments.
(2)
Represents loans modified as TDRs that are current but have not yet made six consecutive payments, bankruptcy loans and certain junior lien TDRs that have a delinquent senior lien.
(3)
The unpaid principal balance in one- to four-family TDRs was $275 million and $283 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. For home equity loans, the recorded investment in TDRs represents the unpaid principal balance.
(4)
Total recorded investment in TDRs at March 31, 2016 consisted of $335 million of loans modified as TDRs and $151 million of loans that have been charged off due to bankruptcy notification. Total recorded investment in TDRs at December 31, 2015 consisted of $334 million of loans modified as TDRs and $154 million of loans that have been charged off due to bankruptcy notification.
The following table shows the average recorded investment and interest income recognized both on a cash and accrual basis for the Company’s TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest Income Recognized
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
One- to four-family
$
282

 
$
313

 
$
2

 
$
2

Home equity
205

 
218

 
4

 
5

Total
$
487

 
$
531

 
$
6

 
$
7


Included in the allowance for loan losses was a specific valuation allowance of $58 million and $61 million that was established for TDRs at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loans, including the economic concessions granted to the borrowers. The following table shows detailed information related to the Company’s TDRs at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions): 
  
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Recorded
Investment
in TDRs
 
Specific
Valuation
Allowance
 
Net Investment
in TDRs
 
Recorded
Investment
in TDRs
 
Specific
Valuation
Allowance
 
Net Investment
in TDRs
With a recorded allowance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
69

 
$
8

 
$
61

 
$
72

 
$
9

 
$
63

Home equity
$
115

 
$
50

 
$
65

 
$
111

 
$
52

 
$
59

Without a recorded allowance:(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
208

 
$

 
$
208

 
$
214

 
$

 
$
214

Home equity
$
94

 
$

 
$
94

 
$
91

 
$

 
$
91

Total:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
277

 
$
8

 
$
269

 
$
286

 
$
9

 
$
277

Home equity
$
209

 
$
50

 
$
159

 
$
202

 
$
52

 
$
150

(1)
Represents loans where the discounted cash flow analysis or collateral value is equal to or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan.
Troubled Debt Restructurings — Loan Modifications
The Company has loan modification programs that focus on the mitigation of potential losses in the one- to four-family and home equity mortgage loan portfolio. The Company currently does not have an active loan modification program for consumer and other loans. The various types of economic concessions that may be granted in a loan modification typically consist of interest rate reductions, maturity date extensions, principal forgiveness or a combination of these concessions. The Company uses specialized servicers that focus on loan modifications and pursue trial modifications for loans that are more than 180 days delinquent. Trial modifications are classified immediately as TDRs and continue to be reported as delinquent until the successful completion of the trial period, which is typically 90 days. The loan then becomes a permanent modification reported as current but remains on nonaccrual status until six consecutive payments have been made.
The following table shows loans modified as TDRs by delinquency category at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Modifications
Current
 
Modifications
30-89 Days
Delinquent
 
Modifications
90-179 Days
Delinquent
 
Modifications
180+ Days
Delinquent
 
Total Recorded
Investment in
Modifications(1)
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
137

 
$
9

 
$
4

 
$
13

 
$
163

Home equity
145

 
9

 
5

 
13

 
172

Total
$
282

 
$
18

 
$
9

 
$
26

 
$
335

December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
138

 
$
11

 
$
5

 
$
16

 
$
170

Home equity
139

 
8

 
6

 
11

 
164

Total
$
277

 
$
19

 
$
11

 
$
27

 
$
334

(1)
Includes loans modified as TDRs that also had received a bankruptcy notification of $43 million and $42 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
The following table shows loans modified as TDRs and the specific valuation allowance by loan portfolio as well as the percentage of total expected losses at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Recorded
Investment in
Modifications
before 
Charge-offs
 
Charge-offs
 
Recorded
Investment in
Modifications
 
Specific
Valuation
Allowance
 
Net Investment in
Modifications
 
Specific 
Valuation
Allowance
as a % of
Modifications
 
Total
Expected
Losses
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
208

 
$
(45
)
 
$
163

 
$
(8
)
 
$
155

 
5
%
 
26
%
Home equity
288

 
(116
)
 
172

 
(50
)
 
122

 
29
%
 
58
%
Total
$
496

 
$
(161
)
 
$
335

 
$
(58
)
 
$
277

 
17
%
 
44
%
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
216

 
$
(46
)
 
$
170

 
$
(9
)
 
$
161

 
5
%
 
25
%
Home equity
284

 
(120
)
 
164

 
(52
)
 
112

 
32
%
 
61
%
Total
$
500

 
$
(166
)
 
$
334

 
$
(61
)
 
$
273

 
18
%
 
45
%

The recorded investment in loans modified as TDRs includes the charge-offs related to certain loans that were written down to the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs. These charge-offs were recorded on modified loans that were delinquent in excess of 180 days, in bankruptcy, or when certain characteristics of the loan, including CLTV, borrower’s credit and type of modification, cast substantial doubt on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan. The total expected loss on loans modified as TDRs includes both the previously recorded charge-offs and the specific valuation allowance.
The vast majority of the Company’s loans modified as TDRs include an interest rate reduction in combination with another type of concession. The Company prioritizes the interest rate reduction modifications in combination with the other modification categories. Each class is mutually exclusive in that if a modification had an interest rate reduction with an extension and other modification, the modification would only be presented in the extension column in the table below. The following tables provide the number of loans and post-modification balances immediately after being modified by major class during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in millions):
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
 
 
Interest Rate Reduction
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Loans
 
Re-age/
Extension/
Interest
Capitalization
 
Other with
Interest Rate
Reduction
 
Other(1)
 
Total
One- to four-family
14

 
$
4

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
5

Home equity
193

 
2

 
1

 
12

 
15

Total
207

 
$
6

 
$
1

 
$
13

 
$
20

 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
 
 
Interest Rate Reduction
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Loans
 
Re-age/
Extension/
Interest
Capitalization
 
Other with
Interest Rate
Reduction
 
Other(1)
 
Total
One- to four-family
6

 
$
1

 
$

 
$

 
$
1

Home equity
243

 
1

 
1

 
16

 
18

Total
249

 
$
2

 
$
1

 
$
16

 
$
19

(1)
Includes TDRs that resulted from a loan modification program being offered to a subset of borrowers with home equity lines of credit whose original loan terms provided the borrowers the option to accelerate their date of conversion to amortizing loans. As certain terms of the Company's offer represented economic concessions, such as longer amortization periods than were in the original loan agreements, to certain borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, this program resulted in $9 million and $14 million of TDRs during the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company considers modifications that become 30 days past due to have experienced a payment default. The following table shows the recorded investment in modifications that experienced a payment default within 12 months after the modification for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in millions): 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
Number of
Loans
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Number of
Loans
 
Recorded
Investment
One- to four-family(1)
5

 
$
2

 
2

 
$
1

Home equity(2)(3)
13

 
1

 
40

 
2

Total
18

 
$
3

 
42

 
$
3

(1)
For three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, less than $1 million and $0, respectively, of the recorded investment in one- to four-family loans that had a payment default in the trailing 12 months was classified as current.
(2)
For both the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, less than $1 million of the recorded investment in home equity loans that had a payment default in the trailing 12 months was classified as current.
(3)
The majority of these home equity modifications during the three months ended March 31, 2015 experienced servicer transfers during this same period.