XML 58 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable, Gross, Allowance, and Net [Abstract]  
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
NOTE 8: LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
 
The Corporation’s loan and allowance policies are as follows:
 
Loans
 
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or payoffs, are reported at their outstanding principal balances, adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any deferred fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term.
 
Discounts and premiums on purchased residential real estate loans are amortized to income using the interest method over the remaining period to contractual maturity, adjusted for anticipated prepayments. Discounts and premiums on purchased consumer loans are recognized over the expected lives of the loans using methods that approximate the interest method.
 
Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status at 90 days past due and interest is considered a loss, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. For all loan classes, the entire balance of the loan is considered past due if the minimum payment contractually required to be paid is not received by the contractual due date. For all loan classes, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
 
Consistent with regulatory guidance, charge-offs on all loan segments are taken when specific loans, or portions thereof, are considered uncollectible. The Corporation’s policy is to promptly charge these loans off in the period the uncollectible loss is reasonably determined.
 
For all loan portfolio segments except one-to-four family residential properties and consumer, the Corporation promptly charges off loans, or portions thereof, when available information confirms that specific loans are uncollectible based on information that includes, but is not limited to, (1) the deteriorating financial condition of the borrower, (2) declining collateral values, and/or (3) legal action, including bankruptcy, that impairs the borrower’s ability to adequately meet its obligations. For impaired loans that are considered to be solely collateral dependent, a partial charge-off is recorded when a loss has been confirmed by an updated appraisal or other appropriate valuation of the collateral.
 
The Corporation charges off one-to-four family residential and consumer loans, or portions thereof, when the Corporation reasonably determines the amount of the loss. The Corporation adheres to timeframes established by applicable regulatory guidance which provides for the charge-down of one-to-four family first and junior lien mortgages to the net realizable value less costs to sell when the loan is 180 days past due, charge-off of unsecured open-end loans when the loan is 180 days past due, and charge-down to the net realizable value when other secured loans are 120 days past due. Loans at these respective delinquency thresholds for which the Corporation can clearly document that the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection, such that collection will occur regardless of delinquency status, need not be charged off.
 
For all loan classes, when loans are placed on nonaccrual, or charged off, interest accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income. Subsequent payments on nonaccrual loans are recorded as a reduction of principal, and interest income is recorded only after principal recovery is reasonably assured. In general, loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Nonaccrual loans are returned to accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of interest or principal. However, for impaired loans and troubled debt restructured, which is included in impaired loans, the Corporation requires a period of satisfactory performance of not less than six months before returning a nonaccrual loan to accrual status.
 
When cash payments are received on impaired loans in each loan class, the Corporation records the payment as interest income unless collection of the remaining recorded principal amount is doubtful, at which time payments are used to reduce the principal balance of the loan. Troubled debt restructured loans recognize interest income on an accrual basis at the renegotiated rate if the loan is in compliance with the modified terms.
 
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to income. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
 
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
 
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical charge-off experience by segment. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Corporation over the prior three years. Management believes the three-year historical loss experience methodology is appropriate in the current economic environment. Other adjustments (qualitative/environmental considerations) for each segment may be added to the allowance for each loan segment after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data.
 
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For impaired loans where the Corporation utilizes the discounted cash flows to determine the level of impairment, the Corporation includes the entire change in the present value of cash flows as provision expense.
 
Segments of loans with similar risk characteristics, including individually evaluated loans not determined to be impaired, are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the group’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans. Accordingly, the Corporation does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements.
 
The following table presents the breakdown of loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
     
September 30, 2013
   
December 31, 2012
 
     
(Unaudited)
       
     
(In Thousands)
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 23,828     $ 26,506  
 
One-to-four family residential
    138,319       137,402  
 
Multi-family residential
    17,695       19,988  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    124,083       106,433  
 
Commercial
    24,299       19,549  
 
Consumer
    4,672       4,906  
        332,896       314,784  
 
Unamortized deferred loan costs
    480       484  
 
Undisbursed loans in process
    (12,476 )     (6,186 )
 
Allowance for loan losses
    (4,340 )     (3,564 )
 
Total loans
  $ 316,560     $ 305,518  
 
 
The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:
 
Construction/Land
 
The Construction/Land segment includes loans for raw land, loans to develop raw land preparatory to building construction, and construction loans of all types. Construction and development loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction and development loans are generally based on estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. These loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Corporation until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest-rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.
 
Land loans are secured by raw land held as an investment, for future development, or as collateral for other use. Management monitors and evaluates these loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. These loans are underwritten based on the underlying purpose of the loan with repayment primarily from the sale or use of the underlying collateral.
 
 
One-to-Four Family Residential and Consumer
 
With respect to residential loans that are secured by one-to-four family residences and are generally owner occupied, the Corporation generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. This segment also includes residential loans secured by non-owner occupied one-to-four family residences. Management tracks the level of owner-occupied residential loans versus non-owner occupied loans as a portion of our recent loss history relates to these loans. Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in one-to-four family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured, such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas, such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.
 
 
Nonresidential (including agricultural land) and Multi-family Residential Real Estate
 
These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Nonresidential and multi-family residential real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Nonresidential and multi-family residential real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Corporation’s nonresidential and multi-family real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. Management monitors and evaluates these loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. As a general rule, the Corporation avoids financing single-purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans.
 
 
Commercial
 
Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets, such as accounts receivable or inventory, and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.
 
The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and information regarding the breakdown of the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans, both presented by portfolio segment and impairment method, as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

     
Construction / Land
 
1-4 Family
 
Multi-Family
 
Nonresidential and Agricultural Land
 
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
     
(Unaudited; In Thousands)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
                             
 
Balances at beginning of period:
  $ 673   $ 1,821   $ 297   $ 1,102   $ 141   $ 2   $ 4,036  
 
Provision for losses
    (350 )   421     28     (447 )   191     177     20  
 
Loans charged off
    (38 )   (83 )   -     -     (2 )   (62 )   (185 )
 
Recoveries on loans
    -     3     -     438     8     20     469  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 285   $ 2,162   $ 325   $ 1,093   $ 338   $ 137   $ 4,340  
                                               
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
                                           
 
Balances at beginning of period
  $ 649   $ 1,423   $ 281   $ 1,077   $ 132   $ 2   $ 3,564  
 
Provision for losses
    (283 )   904     44     (562 )   337     216     656  
 
Loans charged off
    (99 )   (170 )   -     (175 )   (139 )   (136 )   (719 )
 
Recoveries on loans
    18     5     -     753     8     55     839  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 285   $ 2,162   $ 325   $ 1,093   $ 338   $ 137   $ 4,340  
                                               
 
As of September 30, 2013
                                           
 
Allowance for losses:
                                           
 
Individually evaluated for impairment:
  $ 196   $ 466   $ 195   $ 97   $ 74   $ -   $ 1,028  
 
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
    89     1,524     112     983     262     134     3,104  
 
Loans acquired with a deteriorated credit quality:
    -     172     18     13     2     3     208  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 285   $ 2,162   $ 325   $ 1,093   $ 338   $ 137   $ 4,340  
                                               
 
Loans:
                                           
 
Individually evaluated for impairment:
  $ 4,524   $ 5,449   $ 1,081   $ 4,127   $ 402   $ 11   $ 15,594  
 
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
    18,938     131,548     16,129     119,222     23,878     4,638     314,353  
 
Loans acquired with a deteriorated credit quality:
    366     1,322     485     734     19     23     2,949  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 23,828   $ 138,319   $ 17,695   $ 124,083   $ 24,299   $ 4,672   $ 332,896  
 
     
Construction / Land
 
1-4
Family
 
Multi-Family
 
Nonresidential and Agricultural Land
 
Commercial
 
Consumer
   
Total
 
     
(In Thousands)
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2012
                               
 
Balances at beginning of period:
  $ 734   $ 1,390   $ 283   $ 1,091   $ 8   $ 15     $ 3,521  
 
Provision for losses
    (123 )   (13 )   5     301     82     16       268  
 
Loans charged off
    -     (32 )   -     (102 )   -     (20 )     (154 )
 
Recoveries on loans
    -     -     -     3     -     4       7  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 611   $ 1,345   $ 288   $ 1,293   $ 90   $ 15     $ 3,642  
                                                 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
                                             
 
Balances at beginning of period:
  $ 1,016   $ 1,986   $ 65   $ 822   $ 70   $ 44     $ 4,003  
 
Provision for losses
    (69 )   273     223     599     20     18       1,064  
 
Loans charged off
    (340 )   (994 )   -     (131 )   -     (65 )     (1,530 )
 
Recoveries on loans
    4     80     -     3     -     18       105  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 611   $ 1,345   $ 288   $ 1,293   $ 90   $ 15     $ 3,642  
 
 
     
Construction / Land
 
1-4
Family
 
Multi-Family
 
Nonresidential and Agricultural Land
 
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
     
(In Thousands)
 
 
As of December 31, 2012
                             
 
Allowance for losses:
                             
 
Individually evaluated for impairment:
  $ 195   $ 310   $ 196   $ -   $ 93   $ -   $ 794  
 
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
    453     1,113     85     1,078     40     1     2,770  
 
Loans acquired with a deteriorated credit quality:
    -     -     -     -     -     -     -  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 648   $ 1,423   $ 281   $ 1,078   $ 133   $ 1   $ 3,564  
                                               
 
Loans:
                                           
 
Individually evaluated for impairment:
  $ 4,752   $ 4,517   $ 1,104   $ 3,278   $ 565   $ 12   $ 14,228  
 
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
    21,453     131,465     18,433     102,292     18,946     4,864     297,453  
 
Loans acquired with a deteriorated credit quality:
    301     1,420     451     863     38     30     3,103  
 
Balances at end of period
  $ 26,506   $ 137,402   $ 19,988   $ 106,433   $ 19,549   $ 4,906   $ 314,784  
 
The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Corporation’s loan portfolio based on rating category as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Loans acquired from Dupont State Bank in the November 2012 acquisition have been adjusted to fair value for the periods ended December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013.
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
Total Portfolio
   
Pass
   
Special Mention
   
Substandard
   
Doubtful
 
     
(Unaudited; In Thousands)
 
                                 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 23,828     $ 19,034     $ 118     $ 4,676     $ -  
 
1-4 family residential
    138,319       126,031       4,442       7,144       702  
 
Multi-family residential
    17,695       16,087       44       1,564       -  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    124,083       115,701       2,703       5,055       624  
 
Commercial
    24,299       23,329       24       870       76  
 
Consumer
    4,672       4,630       1       41       -  
 
Total Loans
  $ 332,896     $ 304,812     $ 7,332     $ 19,350     $ 1,402  
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
Total Portfolio
   
Pass
   
Special Mention
   
Substandard
   
Doubtful
 
     
(In Thousands)
 
                                 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 26,506     $ 20,952     $ 314     $ 4,909     $ 331  
 
1-4 family residential
    137,402       123,705       6,597       5,885       1,215  
 
Multi-family residential
    19,988       17,546       186       2,256       -  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    106,433       97,307       4,931       2,793       1,402  
 
Commercial
    19,549       18,869       15       414       251  
 
Consumer
    4,906       4,863       14       29       -  
 
Total Loans
  $ 314,784     $ 283,242     $ 12,057     $ 16,286     $ 3,199  
 
Credit Quality Indicators
 
The Corporation categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrowers to service their debt, such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans individually on an ongoing basis by classifying the loans as to credit risk, assigning grade classifications. Loan grade classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss are reported to the Corporation’s board of directors monthly. The Corporation uses the following definitions for credit risk grade classifications:
 
Pass: Loans not meeting the criteria below are considered to be pass rated loans.
 
Special Mention: These assets are currently protected, but potentially weak. They have credit deficiencies deserving a higher degree of attention by management. These assets do not presently exhibit a sufficient degree of risk to warrant adverse classification. Concerns may lie with cash flow, liquidity, leverage, collateral, or industry conditions. These are graded special mention so that the appropriate level of attention is administered to prevent a move to a “substandard” rating.
 
Substandard: By regulatory definition, “substandard” loans are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged. These types of loans have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. A distinct possibility exists that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These loans are considered workout credits. They exhibit at least one of the following characteristics.
 
 
·
An expected loan payment is in excess of 90 days past due (non-performing), or non-earning.
 
·
The financial condition of the borrower has deteriorated to such a point that close monitoring is necessary. Payments do not necessarily have to be past due.
 
·
Repayment from the primary source of repayment is gone or impaired.
 
·
The borrower has filed for bankruptcy protection.
 
·
The loans are inadequately protected by the net worth and cash flow of the borrower.
 
·
The guarantors have been called upon to make payments.
 
·
The borrower has exhibited a continued inability to reduce principal (although interest payment may be current).
 
·
The Corporation is considering a legal action against the borrower.
 
·
The collateral position has deteriorated to a point where there is a possibility the Corporation may sustain some loss. This may be due to the financial condition, improper documentation, or to a reduction in the value of the collateral.
 
·
Although loss may not seem likely, the Corporation has gone to extraordinary lengths (restructuring with extraordinary lengths) to protect its position in order to maintain a high probability of repayment.
 
·
Flaws in documentation leave the Corporation in a subordinated or unsecured position.

 
Doubtful: These loans exhibit the same characteristics as those rated “substandard,” plus weaknesses that make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. This would include inadequately secured loans that are being liquidated, and inadequately protected loans for which the likelihood of liquidation is high. This classification is temporary. Pending events are expected to materially reduce the amount of the loss. This means that the “doubtful” classification will result in either a partial or complete loss on the loan (write-down or specific reserve), with reclassification of the asset as “substandard,” or removal of the asset from the classified list, as in foreclosure or full loss.
 
The Corporation evaluates the loan risk grading system definitions and allowance for loan loss methodology on an ongoing basis. No significant changes were made to either during the quarter or fiscal year.
 
The following tables present the Corporation’s loan portfolio aging analysis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
30-59 Days Past Due
   
60-89 Days Past Due
   
Greater than 90 Days
   
Total Past Due
   
Current
   
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans
   
Total Loans Receivable
 
     
(Unaudited; In Thousands)
 
                                             
 
Construction / Land
  $ 38     $ 304     $ 71     $ 413     $ 23,049     $ 366     $ 23,828  
 
1-4 family residential
    857       949       1,902       3,708       133,289       1,322       138,319  
 
Multi-family residential
    44       -       -       44       17,166       485       17,695  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    525       199       947       1,671       121,678       734       124,083  
 
Commercial
    42       -       632       674       23,606       19       24,299  
 
Consumer
    43       14       19       76       4,573       23       4,672  
      $ 1,549     $ 1,466     $ 3,571     $ 6,586     $ 323,361     $ 2,949     $ 332,896  
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
30-59 Days Past Due
   
60-89 Days Past Due
   
Greater than 90 Days
   
Total Past Due
   
Current
   
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans
   
Total Loans Receivable
 
     
(In Thousands)
 
                                             
 
Construction / Land
  $ 63     $ -     $ 556     $ 619     $ 25,586     $ 301     $ 26,506  
 
1-4 family residential
    1,347       768       1,408       3,523       132,459       1,420       137,402  
 
Multi-family residential
    -       -       -       -       19,537       451       19,988  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    276       -       753       1,029       104,541       863       106,433  
 
Commercial
    100       -       251       351       19,160       38       19,549  
 
Consumer
    36       -       2       38       4,838       30       4,906  
      $ 1,822     $ 768     $ 2,970     $ 5,560     $ 306,121     $ 3,103     $ 314,784  
 
 
At September 30, 2013, there were $70,000 of one-to-four family residential loans and $392,000 of commercial loans that were past due 90 days or more and accruing. At December 31, 2012, there were no loans past due 90 days or more and accruing.
 
The following table presents the Corporation’s nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, which includes both non-performing troubled debt restructured and loans contractually delinquent 90 days or more.
 
     
September 30, 2013
   
December 31, 2012
 
     
(Unaudited)
       
     
(In Thousands)
 
               
 
Construction / Land
  $ 5,206     $ 4,798  
 
One-to-four family residential
    3,118       2,687  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,081       1,104  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    1,769       1,678  
 
Commercial
    521       567  
 
Consumer
    19       16  
 
Total nonaccrual loans
  $ 11,714     $ 10,850  
                   
 
Nonaccrual loans as a percent of total loans receivable
    3.52 %     3.45 %
 
A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include non-performing commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.
 
The following tables present information pertaining to the principal balances and specific valuation allocations for impaired loans, as of September 30, 2013 (unaudited; in thousands):
 
 
Impaired loans without a specific allowance:
 
Recorded Investment
   
Unpaid Principal Balance
   
Specific Allowance
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 2,646     $ 2,875     $ -  
 
1-4 family residential
    3,824       3,893       -  
 
Multi-family residential
    52       53       -  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    3,222       3,699       -  
 
Commercial
    242       406       -  
 
Consumer
    11       11       -  
      $ 9,997     $ 10,937     $ -  
 
 
Impaired loans with a specific allowance:
 
Recorded Investment
   
Unpaid Principal Balance
   
Specific Allowance
 
Construction / Land
  $ 1,878     $ 1,891     $ 196  
 
1-4 family residential
    1,625       1,645       466  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,029       1,046       195  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    905       905       97  
 
Commercial
    160       168       74  
 
Consumer
    -       -       -  
      $ 5,597     $ 5,655     $ 1,028  
 
 
Total impaired loans:
 
Recorded Investment
   
Unpaid Principal Balance
   
Specific Allowance
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 4,524     $ 4,766     $ 196  
 
1-4 family residential
    5,449       5,538       466  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,081       1,099       195  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    4,127       4,604       97  
 
Commercial
    402       574       74  
 
Consumer
    11       11       -  
      $ 15,594     $ 16,592     $ 1,028  
 
The following is a summary by class of information related to the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
     
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
 
     
Average Investment
   
Interest Income Recognized
   
Average Investment
   
Interest Income Recognized
 
     
(Unaudited; In Thousands)
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 4,563     $ 110     $ 4,616     $ 1  
 
1-4 family residential
    4,993       150       6,231       134  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,087       19       759       6  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    3,855       172       3,831       55  
 
Commercial
    465       25       476       16  
 
Consumer
    11       1       15       1  
      $ 14,974     $ 477     $ 15,928     $ 213  
 

 
     
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013
   
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2012
 
     
Average Investment
   
Interest Income Recognized
   
Average Investment
   
Interest Income Recognized
 
     
(Unaudited; In Thousands)
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 4,886     $ 38     $ 4,641     $ 1  
 
1-4 family residential
    5,806       60       5,142       37  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,081       6       1,117       1  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    5,035       36       4,083       21  
 
Commercial
    445       5       517       1  
 
Consumer
    11       -       14       1  
      $ 17,264     $ 145     $ 15,514     $ 62  
 

 
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, interest income recognized on a cash basis included above was $87,000 and $303,000, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, interest income recognized on a cash basis included above was immaterial.
 
The following tables present information pertaining to the principal balances and specific valuation allocations for impaired loans, as of December 31, 2012:
 
 
Impaired loans without a specific allowance:
 
Recorded Investment
   
Unpaid Principal Balance
   
Specific Allowance
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 2,870     $ 3,379     $ -  
 
1-4 family residential
    3,562       3,612       -  
 
Multi-family residential
    53       54       -  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    3,278       4,439       -  
 
Commercial
    386       418       -  
 
Consumer
    12       12       -  
      $ 10,161     $ 11,914     $ -  
 
 
Impaired loans with a specific allowance:
 
Recorded Investment
   
Unpaid Principal Balance
   
Specific Allowance
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 1,882     $ 1,882     $ 195  
 
1-4 family residential
    955       957       310  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,051       1,061       196  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    -       -       -  
 
Commercial
    179       186       93  
 
Consumer
    -       -       -  
      $ 4,067     $ 4,086     $ 794  
 
 
Total impaired loans:
 
Recorded Investment
   
Unpaid Principal Balance
   
Specific Allowance
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ 4,752     $ 5,261     $ 195  
 
1-4 family residential
    4,517       4,569       310  
 
Multi-family residential
    1,104       1,115       196  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    3,278       4,439       -  
 
Commercial
    565       604       93  
 
Consumer
    12       12       -  
      $ 14,228     $ 16,000     $ 794  
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings
 
In the course of working with borrowers, the Corporation may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. In restructuring the loan, the Corporation attempts to work out an alternative payment schedule with the borrower in order to optimize collectability of the loan. Any loans that are modified, whether through a new agreement replacing the old or via changes to an existing loan agreement, are reviewed by the Corporation to identify if a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) has occurred. A troubled debt restructuring occurs when, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Corporation grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status, and the restructuring of the loan may include the transfer of assets from the borrower to satisfy the debt, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. If such efforts by the Corporation do not result in a satisfactory arrangement, the loan is referred to legal counsel, at which time foreclosure proceedings are initiated. At any time prior to a sale of the property at foreclosure, the Corporation may terminate foreclosure proceedings if the borrower is able to work out a satisfactory payment plan.
 
Nonaccrual loans, including TDRs that have not met the six month minimum performance criterion, are reported in this report as non-performing loans. For all loan classes, it is the Corporation’s policy to have any restructured loans which are on nonaccrual status prior to being restructured remain on nonaccrual status until six months of satisfactory borrower performance, at which time management would consider its return to accrual status. A loan is generally classified as nonaccrual when the Corporation believes that receipt of principal and interest is questionable under the terms of the loan agreement. Most generally, this is at 90 or more days past due.
 
The balance of nonaccrual restructured loans, which is included in total nonaccrual loans, was $8.1 million at September 30, 2013. If the restructured loan is on accrual status prior to being restructured, it is reviewed to determine if the restructured loan should remain on accrual status. The balance of accruing restructured loans was $3.8 million at September 30, 2013. Loans that are considered TDR are classified as performing, unless they are on nonaccrual status or greater than 90 days past due, as of the end of the most recent quarter. All TDRs are considered impaired by the Corporation, unless it is determined that the borrower has met the six month satisfactory performance period under the modified terms. On at least a quarterly basis, the Corporation reviews all TDR loans to determine if the loan meets this criterion.
 
With regard to determination of the amount of the allowance for credit losses, all accruing restructured loans are considered to be impaired. As a result, the determination of the amount of impaired loans for each portfolio segment within troubled debt restructurings is the same as detailed previously above.
 
At September 30, 2013, the Corporation had a number of loans that were modified in troubled debt restructurings and impaired. The modification of terms of such loans included one or a combination of the following:  an extension of maturity, a reduction of the stated interest rate or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan.
 
The following tables present information regarding troubled debt restructurings by class for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012:
 
     
For the Nine-Month Period Ended
 September 30, 2013
   
For the Nine-Month Period Ended
 September 30, 2012
 
     
# of Loans
   
Pre-Modification Recorded Balance
   
Post-Modification Recorded Balance
   
# of Loans
   
Pre-Modification Recorded Balance
   
Post-Modification Recorded Balance
 
     
(Unaudited; Dollars In Thousands)
 
         
 
Construction / Land
    4     $ 140     $ 309       1     $ 76     $ 100  
 
One-to-four family residential
    8       342       357       5       1,204       1,249  
 
Multi-family residential
    -       -       -       1       1,068       1,082  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    2       935       935       -       -       -  
 
Commercial
    5       54       113       5       202       211  
 
Consumer
    -       -       -       -       -       -  
        19     $ 1,471     $ 1,714       12     $ 2,550     $ 2,642  
 
 
     
For the Three-Month Period Ended
 September 30, 2013
   
For the Three-Month Period Ended
 September 30, 2012
 
     
# of Loans
   
Pre-Modification Recorded Balance
   
Post-Modification Recorded Balance
   
# of Loans
   
Pre-Modification Recorded Balance
   
Post-Modification Recorded Balance
 
     
(Unaudited; Dollars In Thousands)
 
         
 
Construction / Land
    1     $ 37     $ 37       1     $ 76     $ 100  
 
One-to-four family residential
    -       -       -       -       -       -  
 
Multi-family residential
    -       -       -       -       -       -  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    -       -       -       -       -       -  
 
Commercial
    1       17       15       3       33       41  
 
Consumer
    -       -       -       -       -       -  
        2     $ 54     $ 52       4     $ 109     $ 141  
 
The following tables present information regarding newly restructured troubled debt by type of modification as of September 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
Interest Only
   
Term
   
Combination
   
Total
Modifications
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ -     $ 138     $ 171     $ 309  
 
1-4 family residential
    -       204       153       357  
 
Multi-family residential
    -       -       -       -  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    -       -       935       935  
 
Commercial
    -       -       113       113  
 
Consumer
    -       -       -       -  
      $ -     $ 342     $ 1,372     $ 1,714  
 
 
September 30, 2012
 
Interest Only
   
Term
   
Combination
   
Total
Modifications
 
 
Construction / Land
  $ -     $ -     $ 100     $ 100  
 
1-4 family residential
    -       531       718       1,249  
 
Multi-family residential
    -       1,082       -       1,082  
 
Nonresidential and agricultural land
    -       -       -       -  
 
Commercial
    -       -       211       211  
 
Consumer
    -       -       -       -  
      $ -     $ 1,613     $ 1,029     $ 2,642  
 
 
One loan totaling $79,000, classified and reported as a troubled debt restructuring within the twelve months prior to September 30, 2013, defaulted during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013. The loan was reported as one-to-four family residential real estate. No loans classified as troubled debt restructuring during the twelve-month period prior to September 30, 2012 defaulted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Corporation defines default in this instance as being either past due 90 days or more at the end of the quarter or in the legal process of foreclosure.
 
Financial impact of these restructurings was immaterial to the financials of the Corporation at December 31, 2012.