XML 42 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK [Abstract]  
MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
11.MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
 
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, and trade accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents and investments with high-quality financial institutions and invests in low-risk securities, primarily money market funds or long-term U.S. government agency obligations. At times, cash balances may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurable limits of $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. Amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurable limits at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 approximated $4.89 million and $3.70 million, respectively.

Trade receivables potentially subject the Company to credit risk. The Company’s standard wholesale customer payment terms on trade receivables are generally between 30 and 90 days, though it may offer extended terms with specific customers and on significant orders from time to time. The Company believes its competitors and other vendors in the wholesale jewelry industry have also expanded their use of extended payment terms and, in aggregate, the Company believes that by expanding its use of extended payment terms, it has provided a competitive response in its market and that its net sales have been favorably impacted. The Company is unable to estimate the impact of this program on its net sales, but if it ceased providing extended payment terms in select instances, the Company believes it would not be competitive for some wholesale customers in the marketplace and that its net sales and profits would likely decrease. The Company extends credit to its customers based upon a number of factors, including an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history, the customer’s payment history with the Company, the customer’s reputation in the trade, and/or an evaluation of the Company’s opportunity to introduce its moissanite jewels or finished jewelry featuring moissanite to new or expanded markets. Collateral is not generally required from customers. The need for an allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends, and other information. The Company has not experienced any significant accounts receivable write-offs related to revenue arrangements with extended payment terms. The Company‘s allowance for doubtful accounts includes approximately $800,000 related to one customer that has become past due on its payment arrangement.

At times, a portion of the Company’s accounts receivable will be due from customers that have individual balances in excess of 10% of the Company’s total net accounts receivable.  The following is a summary of customers that represent greater than or equal to 10% of total net accounts receivable:

  
March 31, 2015
  
December 31, 2014
 
Customer A
  
33
%
  
28
%
Customer B
  
16
%
  
2
%
Customer C
  
13
%
  
11
%

A significant portion of sales is derived from certain customer relationships. The following is a summary of customers that represent greater than or equal to 10% of total gross sales:

  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
2015
  
2014
 
Customer A
  
24
%
  
23
%
Customer B
  
17
%
  
25
%
Customer C
  
-3
%
  
20
%

The Company records its sales return allowance at the corporate level based on several factors including historical sales return activity and specific allowances for known customer returns.  For this disclosure, the Company reports the customer activity without effect of specific sales return allowances.  Customer C returned goods in excess of its purchases during the period; however, these returns did not affect current period revenue as these returns had been specifically reserved as of December 31, 2014.  As these returns were received from Customer C, the Company reduced its sales return allowance related to these returns.