XML 37 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill
We review goodwill for impairment on a reporting unit basis annually during the fourth quarter of each year, using a measurement date of October 1st, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill by reporting unit as of October 1, 2017, during the fourth quarter of 2017, and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its carrying amount. In assessing the qualitative factors, the Company considered the impact of key factors including macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, and other relevant entity-and reporting unit-specific events. As such, it was not necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test at that time. In addition, there have been no significant events or circumstances affecting the valuation of goodwill subsequent to the qualitative assessment performed in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. If the qualitative factors had indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units was less than its carrying amount, the Company would have tested goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level using a two-step approach.
The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. In step one, we compare the fair value of each of our reporting units to its carrying value, including the goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, there is no indication of impairment and no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we must perform step two of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In step two, the reporting unit’s fair value is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a hypothetical analysis that calculates the implied fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is less than the carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss.

Allocation of Goodwill to Reporting Units
The following table shows our goodwill balances by our segment reporting structure: 
(In millions)
 
Food Care
 
Product Care
 
Total
Carrying Value at December 31, 2016
 
$
510.8

 
$
1,372.1

 
$
1,882.9

Acquisition and divestiture
 
10.1

 
39.3

 
49.4

Currency translation
 
6.0

 
1.5

 
7.5

Carrying Value at December 31, 2017
 
$
526.9

 
$
1,412.9

 
$
1,939.8


    
As noted above, it was determined under a qualitative assessment that it was more likely than not that the fair value of any reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. Therefore, there was no impairment of goodwill. However, if the fair value decreases in future periods, the Company may fail step one of the goodwill impairment test and be required to perform step two. In performing step two, the fair value would have to be allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. Therefore, any potential goodwill impairment charge would be dependent upon the estimated fair value of the reporting unit at that time and the outcome of step two of the impairment test. The fair values of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including the intangible assets could vary depending on various factors.
The future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment, such as a decrease in expected net earnings, adverse equity market conditions, a decline in current market multiples, a decline in our common stock price, a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climates, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions, or a more likely than not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or disposed of, could require an interim assessment for some or all of the reporting units before the next required annual assessment. In the event of significant adverse changes of the nature described above, we might have to recognize a non-cash impairment of goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net
The following tables summarize our identifiable intangible assets, net with definite and indefinite useful lives: 
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
(In millions)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net (1)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Impairment
 
Net
Customer relationships
 
$
59.7

 
$
(19.7
)
 
$
40.0

 
$
25.0

 
$
(17.5
)
 
$
7.5

Trademarks and tradenames
 
11.6

 
(0.5
)
 
11.1

 
0.6

 
(0.2
)
 
0.4

Capitalized software
 
50.6

 
(40.0
)
 
10.6

 
42.6

 
(31.2
)
 
11.4

Technology
 
39.2

 
(27.5
)
 
11.7

 
34.4

 
(24.2
)
 
10.2

Contracts
 
10.9

 
(9.6
)
 
1.3

 
10.6

 
(8.9
)
 
1.7

Total intangible assets with definite lives
 
172.0

 
(97.3
)
 
74.7

 
113.2

 
(82.0
)
 
31.2

Trademarks and tradenames with indefinite lives
 
8.9

 

 
8.9

 
8.9

 

 
8.9

Total identifiable intangible assets
 
$
180.9

 
$
(97.3
)
 
$
83.6

 
$
122.1

 
$
(82.0
)
 
$
40.1


 
       
(1) 
As of December 31, 2017, amounts include intangible assets inquired as part of the Fagerdala acquisition. See Note 3, "Discontinued Operations, Divestitures and Acquisitions" to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the Fagerdala acquisition.
The following table shows the remaining estimated future amortization expense at December 31, 2017
Year
 
Amount
(in millions)
2018
 
$
11.1

2019
 
8.1

2020
 
5.8

2021
 
5.3

Thereafter
 
44.4

Total
 
$
74.7


 
Amortization expense was $13.1 million in 2017, $15.0 million in 2016 and $11.1 million in 2015.
 
The following table shows the remaining weighted average useful life of our definite lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2017
 
Remaining weighted average useful lives
Customer relationships
15.3
Trademarks and trade names
14.5
Technology
3.3
Contracts
3.7
Total identifiable intangible assets, net with definite lives
11.5