UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020
OR
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                        to

Commission File Number: 1-15081

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	94-1234979
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY	10020
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) (212) 782-6800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).   Yes x    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company o
	Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes o   No x

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at July 31, 2020: 132,076,912

THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H (1) (a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	33
Item 1. Financial Statements	33
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	33
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	34
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	35
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)	36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	37
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations	38
Note 2—Securities	42
Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses	46
Note 4—Variable Interest Entities	56
Note 5—Securities Financing Arrangements	58
Note 6—Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Borrowings	60
Note 7—Long-Term Debt	61
Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments	62
Note 9—Derivative Instruments and Other Financial Instruments Used For Hedging	67
Note 10—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	70
Note 11—Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits	73
Note 12—Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees	74
Note 13—Business Segments	75
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	7
Consolidated Financial Highlights	7
Introduction	10
Executive Overview	10
Financial Performance	12
Balance Sheet Analysis	16
Capital Management	17
Risk Management	20
Critical Accounting Estimates	29
Non-GAAP Financial Measures	31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	32
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	79
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	79
Item 1A. Risk Factors	79
Item 6. Exhibits	85
SIGNATURES	86

2

Glossary of Defined Terms

The following acronyms and abbreviations are used throughout this Form 10-Q, particularly in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements," Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

ALCO	Asset Liability Management Committee
ALM	Asset Liability Management
AOCI	Accumulated other comprehensive income
ARC	Americas Risk Committee
ASU	Accounting Standards Update
BCBS	Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
BHC	U.S. Bank Holding Company
CARES Act	Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
CCAR	Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CD	Certificate of deposit
CECL	Current Expected Credit Loss
CLO	Collateralized loan obligation
CMBS	Commercial mortgage-backed security
COVID-19	Coronavirus Disease 2019
Dodd-Frank Act	Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EAD	Exposure at default
ECA	Executive Committee for the Americas
EGRRCPA	Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act
ESBP	Executive Supplemental Benefit Plan
EURIBOR	Euro Interbank Offered Rate
Exchange Act	U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC	Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Reserve	Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FHLB	Federal Home Loan Bank
FICO	Fair Isaac Corporation
Fitch	Fitch Ratings
GAAP	Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GSIB	Global systemically important bank
IBOR	Inter-bank Offered Rate
LGD	Loss given default
LIBOR	London Inter-bank Offered Rate
LIHC	Low income housing tax credit
LLC	Limited Liability Company
LTV	Loan-to-value
Moody's	Moody's Investors Service
MRM	Market Risk Management
MUAH	MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
MUB	MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
MUFG	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
MUSA	MUFG Securities Americas Inc.
nm	Not meaningful
OCI	Other comprehensive income
OFAC	U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control
OREO	Other real estate owned
PD	Probability of default
PPP	Paycheck Protection Program of the SBA
RMBS	Residential mortgage-backed security
S&P	Standard & Poor's Global Ratings
SBA	Small Business Administration
SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission
SERP	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
TDR	Troubled debt restructuring
TLAC	Total Loss Absorbing Capacity
VIE	Variable interest entity

3

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes forward-looking statements, which include expectations for our operations and business and our assumptions for those expectations. Do not rely unduly on forward-looking statements. Actual results might differ significantly compared to our expectations. See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our 2019 Form 10-K, Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q, and the other risks described in this Form 10-Q and in our 2019 Form 10-K, for factors to be considered when reading any forward-looking statements in this filing.

Forward-looking statements are subject to the "safe harbor" created by section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We may make forward-looking statements in our SEC filings, press releases, news articles and when we are speaking on behalf of MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Often, they include the words "believe," "expect," "target," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "seek," "estimate," "potential," "project," "forecast," "outlook," words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "would," "should," "could," "might," or "may." These forward-looking statements are intended to provide investors with additional information with which they may assess our future potential. All of these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions about an uncertain future and are based on information known to our management at the date of these statements. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect facts, circumstances, assumptions or events that occur after the date any forward-looking statements are made.

In this document and other reports to the SEC, for example, we make forward-looking statements, which discuss our expectations about:

• Our business objectives, strategies and initiatives, organizational structure, business growth, competitive position and prospects, and the effect of competition on our business and strategies

• Our assessment of significant factors and developments that have affected or may affect our results

• Our assessment of economic conditions and trends, economic and credit cycles and their impact on our business

• The economic outlook for the U.S. in general, West Coast states and global economies

• The effects of the coronavirus pandemic on the U.S. and global economies, and on our business and results of operations, and the actions of governments to reduce the spread of the virus and to mitigate the resulting economic consequences, and the effect of the foregoing on our business

• The impact of changes in interest rates resulting from changes in Federal Reserve policy or for other reasons, our strategy to manage our interest rate risk profile and other market risks, our outlook for short-term and long-term interest rates and their effect on our net interest margin, our investment portfolio, our balance sheet composition, our borrowers’ ability to service their loans and residential mortgage loans and refinancings

• Pending and recent legislative and regulatory actions, and future legislative and regulatory developments, including the effects of legislation and other governmental measures, including the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, the Dodd-Frank Act, the EGRRCPA, as well as the Federal CARES Act enacted in March 2020 in an effort to mitigate the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic and the governmental actions in response thereto, changes to the deposit insurance assessment policies of the FDIC, the effect on and application of foreign and other laws and regulations to our business and operations, and anticipated fees, costs or other impacts on our business and operations as a result of these developments

• Our strategies and expectations regarding capital levels and liquidity, our funding base, deposits, long-term debt, issuance of additional notes under the Bank's unsecured bank note program, our expectations regarding the capital, liquidity and enhanced prudential standards adopted by the U.S. bank regulators as a result of or under the Dodd-Frank Act and the BCBS capital and liquidity standards including the Federal banking agencies' TLAC regulation, and other recently adopted and proposed regulations by the U.S. federal banking agencies, including the requirement that all CCAR

4

firms, including MUAH, conduct additional stress testing and resubmit their capital plans to the Federal Reserve within 45 days after the Federal Reserve releases new supervisory scenarios, and the effect of the foregoing on our business and expectations regarding compliance

• Regulatory and compliance controls and processes and their impact on our business, including our operating costs and revenues

• The costs and effects of legal actions, investigations, regulatory actions, criminal proceedings or similar matters, our anticipated litigation strategies, our assessment of the timing and ultimate outcome of legal actions, or adverse facts and developments related thereto

• Our allowance for credit losses, including the conditions we consider in determining the unallocated allowance and our portfolio credit quality, probability of default and credit migration trends, and severity of loss upon default, and our economic forecasts considered in determining the provision for credit losses

• Loan portfolio composition and risk rating trends, residential loan delinquency rates compared to the industry average, portfolio credit quality, our strategy regarding TDRs, and our intent to sell or hold loans we originate

• Our intent to sell or hold, and the likelihood that we would be required to sell, or expectations regarding recovery of the amortized cost basis of, various investment securities

• Our hedging strategies, positions, expectations regarding reclassifications of gains or losses on hedging instruments into earnings; and the sensitivity of our net income to various factors, including customer behavior relating to mortgage prepayments and deposit repricing

• Expected rates of return, maturities, yields, loss exposure, growth rates, pension plan strategies, contributions and benefit payments, forecasted balance sheet activity and projected results

• Tax rates and taxes, the possible effect of changes in taxable profits of the U.S. operations of MUFG on our state tax obligations and of expected tax credits or benefits

• Critical accounting policies and estimates, and the potential impact on our critical accounting estimates resulting from the significant ongoing uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact or anticipated impact of recent accounting pronouncements, guidance or changes in accounting principles and future recognition of impairments for the fair value of assets, including goodwill, financial instruments, intangible assets and other assets

• Decisions to downsize, sell or close units, dissolve subsidiaries, expand our branch network, pursue acquisitions, purchase banking facilities and equipment, realign our business model or otherwise restructure, reorganize or change our business mix, or the transfer to MUAH by MUFG of its interests in U.S. subsidiaries, and their timing and impact on our business

• Our expectations regarding the impact of acquisitions on our business and results of operations

• The impact of changes in our credit ratings including methodology changes adopted by rating agencies

• Maintenance of casualty and liability insurance coverage appropriate for our operations

• The relationship between our business and that of MUFG Bank, Ltd. and MUFG, the impact of their credit ratings, operations or prospects on our credit ratings and actions that may or may not be taken by MUFG Bank, Ltd. and MUFG

• Threats to the banking sector and our business due to cyber-security issues and attacks on financial institutions and other businesses, such as large retailers, and regulatory expectations relating to cyber-security

• Technological challenges and our Transformation and Rewiring Programs and our other technology-related programs and initiatives and our expectations regarding their implementation and performance, including the impact and timing of completion of our Transformation and Rewiring programs

5

• Our understanding that MUFG Bank, Ltd. will continue to limit its participation in transactions with Iranian entities and individuals to certain types of transactions

• The possible risks resulting from the replacement of LIBOR, the Company's exposure to IBOR-based rates, and the Company's LIBOR transition program and expectations regarding its effectiveness

• The effect of a possible return of the California drought on its economy and related governmental actions and the potential consequences of recent California wildfires and related electrical power outages or other natural disasters

• Descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing

Readers of this document should not rely unduly on any forward-looking statements, which reflect only our management’s belief as of the date of this report. There are numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or prospects. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described or referred to in Part I, Item 1. “Business” under the captions “Competition” and “Supervision and Regulation” in our 2019 Form 10-K, and in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-Q, and in our other reports to the SEC.

Any factor described in this report or in our other reports could by itself, or together with one or more other factors, adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

6

Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Highlights

	For the Three Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019			Percent Change		June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019			Percent Change
Results of operations:
Net interest income	$	787		$	777		1	%	$	1,561		$	1,560		—	%
Noninterest income	809			649			25		1,421			1,281			11
Total revenue	1,596			1,426			12		2,982			2,841			5
Noninterest expense	1,178			1,154			2		2,379			2,324			2
Pre-tax, pre-provision income(1)	418			272			54		603			517			17
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses	361			56			nm		831			94			nm
Income (loss) before income taxes and including noncontrolling interests	57			216			(74)		(228		)	423			(154	)
Income tax expense (benefit)	39			20			95		64			48			33
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	18			196			(91)		(292		)	375			(178	)
Deduct: Net loss (income) from noncontrolling interests	4			3			33		8			8			—
Net income (loss) attributable to MUAH	$	22		$	199		(89)		$	(284	)	$	383		(174	)
Balance sheet (period average):
Total assets	$	169,012		$	170,336		(1	)%	$	168,978		$	168,927		—	%
Total securities	23,663			26,504			(11	)	24,806			26,801			(7	)
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	15,173			23,029			(34	)	18,303			22,660			(19	)
Total loans held for investment	88,586			88,308			—		88,116			87,725			—
Earning assets	154,448			156,368			(1	)	155,015			155,175			—
Total deposits	102,666			93,919			9		99,533			92,311			8
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	21,629			28,084			(23	)	24,396			27,618			(12	)
MUAH stockholders' equity	16,849			17,120			(2	)	16,688			16,920			(1	)
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets(2)	0.05		%	0.47		%			(0.34		)%	0.45		%
Return on average MUAH stockholders' equity(2)	0.52			4.65					(3.40		)	4.53
Return on average MUAH tangible common equity(2)(3)	0.70			6.09					(3.74		)	5.93
Efficiency ratio(4)	73.82			80.94					79.78			81.80
Adjusted efficiency ratio (5)	68.14			76.68					75.55			77.82
Net interest margin(2)(6)	2.05			2.00					2.03			2.03
Net loans charged-off to average total loans held for investment(2)	(0.24		)	0.09					(0.26		)	0.09

7

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Highlights (Continued)

	As of
	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019			Percent Change
Balance sheet (end of period):
Total assets	$	167,350		$	170,810		(2	)%
Total securities	23,734			27,210			(13	)
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	17,081			23,943			(29	)
Total loans held for investment	86,535			88,213			(2	)
Nonperforming assets	621			329			89
Total deposits	102,572			95,861			7
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	22,087			28,866			(23	)
Long-term debt	16,785			17,129			(2	)
MUAH stockholders' equity	16,658			16,280			2
Credit ratios:
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment(7)	1.68		%	0.61		%
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans(7)	233.74			164.19
Allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment(8)	1.80			0.73
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans(8)	251.28			197.34
Nonperforming assets to total loans held for investment and OREO	0.72			0.37
Nonperforming assets to total assets	0.37			0.19
Nonaccrual loans to total loans held for investment	0.72			0.37
Capital ratios:
Regulatory(9):
Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	14.48		%	14.10		%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	14.48			14.10
Total risk-based capital ratio	15.65			14.73
Tier 1 leverage ratio	8.94			8.88
Other:
Tangible common equity ratio(10)	8.88		%	8.45		%

8

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Highlights (Continued)

(1) Pre-tax, pre-provision income is total revenue less noninterest expense. Management believes that this is a useful financial measure because it enables investors and others to assess the Company's ability to generate capital to cover credit losses through a credit cycle.

(2) Annualized.

(3) Return on tangible common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is net income (loss) excluding intangible asset amortization divided by average tangible common equity. Management believes that this ratio provides useful supplemental information regarding the Company's business results. The methodology for determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Part I, Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-Q for additional information.

(4) The efficiency ratio is total noninterest expense as a percentage of total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).

(5) The adjusted efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, is adjusted noninterest expense (noninterest expense excluding costs associated with services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd. branches in the U.S.) as a percentage of adjusted total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income excluding fees from affiliates for services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd.'s branches in the U.S.). Management believes adjusting the efficiency ratio for the fees and costs associated with services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd. branches in the U.S. enhances the comparability of MUAH's efficiency ratio when compared with other financial institutions. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Part I, Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-Q for additional information.

(6) Yields, interest income and net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 21%.

(7) The allowance for loan losses ratios are calculated using the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of end of period total loans held for investment or total nonaccrual loans, as appropriate.

(8) The allowance for credit losses ratios include the allowances for loan losses and for losses on unfunded credit commitments as a percentage of end of period total loans held for investment or total nonaccrual loans, as appropriate.

(9) These capital ratios are calculated in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the U.S. federal banking agencies' final U.S. Basel III regulatory capital rules and all applicable amendments.

(10) The tangible common equity ratio, a non-GAAP financial measure, is calculated as tangible common equity divided by tangible assets. The methodology for determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. The tangible common equity ratio facilitates the understanding of the Company's capital structure and is used to assess and compare the quality and composition of the Company's capital structure to other financial institutions. See "Capital Management" in Part I, Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-Q for additional information.

9

Please refer to our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2019 Form 10-K) along with the following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial position and results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2020 in this Form 10-Q. Averages, as presented in the following tables, are substantially all based upon daily average balances.

As used in this Form 10-Q, terms such as the "Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation (MUAH), one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or to all of them together. As permitted by General Instruction H(2) of Form 10-Q, we have abbreviated Management's Discussion and Analysis into a management's narrative analysis of the results of operations.

Introduction

We are a financial holding company, bank holding company and intermediate holding company whose principal subsidiaries are MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (MUB or the Bank) and MUSA. We are owned by MUFG Bank, Ltd. and MUFG. MUFG Bank, Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MUFG.

The Company has four reportable segments: Regional Bank, Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S., Transaction Banking and MUSA. We service Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S., certain Transaction Banking, and MUSA customers through the MUFG brand and serve Regional Bank and Transaction Banking customers through the Union Bank brand. We provide a wide range of financial services to consumers, small businesses, middle-market companies and major corporations, both nationally and internationally.

The Company also provides various business, banking, financial, administrative and support services, and facilities for MUFG Bank, Ltd. in connection with the operation and administration of MUFG Bank, Ltd.'s business in the U.S. (including MUFG Bank, Ltd.'s U.S. branches). The Bank and MUFG Bank, Ltd. are parties to a master services agreement whereby the Bank earns fee income in exchange for services and facilities provided.

The Company’s leadership team is bicoastal with Regional Bank and Transaction Banking leaders on the West Coast while Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S. and MUSA leaders are based in New York City. The corporate headquarters (principal executive office) for MUB, MUSA and MUAH is in New York City. MUB's main banking office is in San Francisco. The Company had consolidated assets of $167.4 billion at June 30, 2020.

Executive Overview

We are providing you with an overview of what we believe are the most significant factors and developments that affected our second quarter 2020 results and that could influence our future results. Further detailed information can be found elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. In addition, you should carefully read this entire document and any other reports that we refer to in this Form 10-Q for more detailed information to assist your understanding of trends, events and uncertainties that impact us.

Our sources of revenue are net interest income and noninterest income (collectively “total revenue”). Net interest income is generated predominantly from interest earned from loans, investment securities, securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, trading account assets and other interest-earning assets, less interest incurred on deposits and borrowings, securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements and other interest-bearing liabilities. The primary sources of noninterest income are revenues from investment banking and syndication fees, service charges on deposit accounts, trust and investment management fees, trading account activities, credit facility fees, and fees from affiliates. Changes in interest rates, credit quality, economic trends and the capital markets are primary factors that affect our revenue sources. In the second quarter of 2020, revenue was comprised of 49% net interest income and 51% noninterest income. A summary of our financial results is discussed below.

Our primary sources of liquidity are core deposits, securities and wholesale funding. Core deposits exclude brokered deposits, foreign time deposits, domestic time deposits greater than $250,000, and certain other deposits not considered to be core customer relationships. Wholesale funding includes unsecured funds raised from MUFG Bank, Ltd. and affiliates, interbank and other sources, both domestic and international, funding secured by certain assets, or by borrowing from the FHLB. We evaluate and monitor the stability and reliability of our various funding sources to help ensure that we have sufficient liquidity when adverse situations arise.

10

In order to better serve our clients and reduce our cost base, we have launched two multi-year initiatives that we believe are critical to our success: our technology-focused Transformation Program and our continuous improvement, cost-reduction focused Rewiring Program. The Transformation Program is based on three pillars: transformation of our core banking systems, data analytics and functionality, and technology modernization. The Rewiring Program targets four areas: workforce geographic distribution, organizational design, procurement, and process simplification and automation.

Performance Highlights

Net income (loss) attributable to MUAH was $22 million and ($284 million) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, compared with $199 million and $383 million in the same periods in 2019. The decreases in net income were largely due to the provision for credit losses of $361 million and $831 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. The provision for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 was substantially driven by the impact of COVID-19 and the corresponding deterioration in the economic environment. The global pandemic from the spread of COVID-19 and governmental responses thereto have significantly impacted the U.S. and California economies and caused significant ongoing economic uncertainty, which may affect our critical accounting estimates, including our assumptions used to estimate the allowance for credit losses and used in our goodwill impairment analysis, and may adversely affect our business and results of operations in many other ways, the ultimate impact of which cannot be predicted at this time. See "Critical Accounting Estimates” in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and "Risk Factors" in Part II. Item 1A in this Form 10-Q.

On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which provides new guidance on the accounting for credit losses for instruments that are within its scope. This new guidance, commonly referred to as the CECL model, primarily impacts the Company's loans and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures and requires an entity to recognize its estimate of credit losses expected over the life of the financial instrument or exposure by incorporating forward-looking information, such as reasonable and supportable forecasts, in the entity's assessment of the collectability of financial assets. Incorporating forward-looking information into the estimate of credit losses may result in more volatility in the allowance for credit losses and related provision, particularly when the economic environment is more uncertain, such as during the first six months of 2020. Upon adoption, the Company recorded an increase to the allowance for credit losses of $199 million, primarily due to an increase in the allowance for consumer loans. The Company elected to calculate its regulatory capital ratios using the CECL five-year transition option as prescribed by the U.S. regulatory banking agencies. See "Risk Management - Credit Risk Management" in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1 and Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Capital Ratios

The Company's capital ratios continued to exceed all well-capitalized and minimum regulatory thresholds for BHCs, as applicable. The U.S. Basel III Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital ratios were 14.48%, 14.48% and 15.65%, respectively, at June 30, 2020. The Tier 1 leverage ratio was 8.94% at June 30, 2020.

11

Financial Performance

Net Interest Income

The following tables show the major components of net interest income and net interest margin.

	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2020							June 30, 2019
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense(1)		Average Yield/ Rate(1)(2)		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense(1)		Average Yield/ Rate(1)(2)
(Dollars in millions)
Assets
Loans held for investment:(3)
Commercial and industrial	$	30,079		$	212	2.83	%	$	25,511		$	282	4.44	%
Commercial mortgage	16,827			132		3.15		15,581			163		4.17
Construction	1,656			13		3.17		1,638			23		5.86
Lease financing	986			11		4.40		1,295			24		7.49
Residential mortgage and home equity	34,876			280		3.21		40,618			364		3.59
Other consumer	4,162			93		9.00		3,665			80		8.71
Total loans held for investment	88,586			741		3.35		88,308			936		4.25
Securities	23,663			134		2.27		26,504			147		2.21
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	15,173			33		0.87		23,029			84		1.47
Interest bearing deposits in banks	15,640			4		0.09		7,424			46		2.50
Trading account assets	10,276			96		3.72		10,553			90		3.45
Other earning assets	1,110			5		2.01		550			4		3.24
Total earning assets	154,448			1,013		2.63		156,368			1,307		3.35
Allowance for loan losses	(1,141		)					(513		)
Cash and due from banks	1,978							1,895
Other assets(4)	13,727							12,586
Total assets	$	169,012						$	170,336
Liabilities
Interest bearing deposits:
Transaction and money market accounts	$	43,041		$	31	0.28	%	$	36,977		$	94	1.02	%
Savings	9,438			12		0.51		9,482			23		1.00
Time	12,335			54		1.76		16,140			98		2.42
Total interest bearing deposits	64,814			97		0.60		62,599			215		1.38
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	4,640			9		0.79		8,354			52		2.50
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	21,629			13		0.25		28,084			105		1.50
Long-term debt	16,771			88		2.09		16,562			127		3.08
Total borrowed funds	43,040			110		1.03		53,000			284		2.15
Trading account liabilities	3,152			15		2.01		3,476			26		3.05
Total interest bearing liabilities	111,006			222		0.80		119,075			525		1.77
Noninterest bearing deposits	37,852							31,320
Other liabilities(5)	3,222							2,755
Total liabilities	152,080							153,150
Equity
MUAH stockholders' equity	16,849							17,120
Noncontrolling interests	83							66
Total equity	16,932							17,186
Total liabilities and equity	$	169,012						$	170,336
Net interest income/spread (taxable-equivalent basis)				791		1.83	%				782		1.58	%
Impact of noninterest bearing deposits						0.20							0.37
Impact of other noninterest bearing sources						0.02							0.05
Net interest margin						2.05							2.00
Less: taxable-equivalent adjustment				4							5
Net interest income				$	787						$	777

(1) Yields, interest income and net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 21%.

(2) Annualized.

(3) Average balances of loans held for investment include nonaccrual loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees (costs) is included in interest income on loans, representing an adjustment to the yield.

(4) Other assets include noninterest bearing trading account assets.

(5) Other liabilities include noninterest bearing trading account liabilities.

12

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2020							June 30, 2019
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense(1)		Average Yield/ Rate(1)(2)		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense(1)		Average Yield/ Rate(1)(2)
(Dollars in millions)
Assets
Loans held for investment:(3)
Commercial and industrial	$	28,336		$	472	3.36	%	$	25,390		$	562	4.46	%
Commercial mortgage	16,910			284		3.36		15,469			324		4.19
Construction	1,598			29		3.67		1,621			44		5.53
Lease financing	995			22		4.47		1,263			37		5.84
Residential mortgage and home equity	35,973			600		3.34		40,631			736		3.63
Other consumer	4,304			195		9.11		3,351			144		8.63
Total loans held for investment	88,116			1,602		3.65		87,725			1,847		4.23
Securities	24,806			256		2.07		26,801			312		2.33
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	18,303			157		1.72		22,660			418		3.73
Interest bearing deposits in banks	12,218			31		0.51		6,749			82		2.46
Federal funds sold	—			—		—		2			—		7.11
Trading account assets	10,599			187		3.55		10,692			183		3.46
Other earning assets	973			11		2.25		546			9		3.36
Total earning assets	155,015			2,244		2.91		155,175			2,851		3.69
Allowance for loan losses	(951		)					(493		)
Cash and due from banks	2,050							1,818
Other assets(4)	12,864							12,427
Total assets	$	168,978						$	168,927
Liabilities
Interest bearing deposits:
Transaction and money market accounts	$	41,630		$	107	0.52	%	$	37,035		$	180	0.98	%
Savings	9,195			26		0.58		9,552			47		1.00
Time	13,675			136		2.00		14,529			172		2.38
Total interest bearing deposits	64,500			269		0.84		61,116			399		1.32
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	5,116			36		1.41		8,798			108		2.48
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	24,396			132		1.10		27,618			460		3.36
Long-term debt	16,668			197		2.36		16,806			258		3.07
Total borrowed funds	46,180			365		1.59		53,222			826		3.13
Trading account liabilities	3,322			39		2.40		3,680			55		3.02
Total interest-bearing liabilities	114,002			673		1.19		118,018			1,280		2.19
Noninterest bearing deposits	35,033							31,195
Other liabilities(5)	3,171							2,726
Total liabilities	152,206							151,939
Equity
MUAH stockholders' equity	16,688							16,920
Noncontrolling interests	84							68
Total equity	16,772							16,988
Total liabilities and equity	$	168,978						$	168,927
Net interest income/spread (taxable-equivalent basis)				1,571		1.72	%				1,571		1.50	%
Impact of noninterest bearing deposits						0.28							0.46
Impact of other noninterest bearing sources						0.03							0.07
Net interest margin						2.03							2.03
Less: taxable-equivalent adjustment				10							11
Net interest income				$	1,561						$	1,560

(1) Yields, interest income and net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 21%.

(2) Annualized.

(3) Average balances of loans held for investment include nonaccrual loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees (costs) is included in interest income on loans, representing an adjustment to the yield.

(4) Other assets include noninterest bearing trading account assets.

(5) Other liabilities include noninterest bearing trading account liabilities.

13

Net interest income for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 was nearly flat compared with the same periods in 2019 due to the positive contribution of securities borrowing and lending transactions at MUSA, substantially offset by a decrease in net interest income from the Company's other lending activities, almost entirely at MUB. Rates on securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements decreased more than yields on securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements resulting in an increase in the net interest income from these transactions despite a decrease in the related balances. The decrease in net interest income from the other lending activities was primarily due to yields on earning assets declining more than funding costs in a declining rate environment. Earning assets decreased largely due to decreases in securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, residential mortgage and home equity loans, and securities, partially offset by increases in interest bearing deposits in banks, and commercial and industrial and commercial mortgage loans.

Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expense

The following tables display our noninterest income and noninterest expense for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019.

Noninterest Income

	For the Three Months Ended									For the Six Months Ended
					Increase (Decrease)									Increase (Decrease)
	June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019							June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)					Amount			Percent						Amount			Percent
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	34	$	40	$	(6	)	(15	)%	$	75	$	82	$	(7	)	(9	)%
Trust and investment management fees	29		29		—			—		58		58		—			—
Trading account activities	37		17		20			118		1		36		(35		)	(97)
Securities gains, net	57		22		35			159		110		23		87			378
Credit facility fees	26		24		2			8		50		47		3			6
Brokerage commissions and fees	15		19		(4		)	(21	)	33		39		(6		)	(15	)
Card processing fees, net	11		14		(3		)	(21	)	25		27		(2		)	(7	)
Investment banking and syndication fees	164		102		62			61		284		226		58			26
Fees from affiliates	393		353		40			11		754		695		59			8
Other, net	43		29		14			48		31		48		(17		)	(35	)
Total noninterest income	$	809	$	649	$	160		25		$	1,421	$	1,281	$	140		11

Noninterest income increased during the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 compared with the same periods in 2019 primarily due to increases in gains on sale of securities, investment banking and syndication fees, and fees from affiliates for services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd. under the master services agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019, these increases were partially offset by a decrease in trading account activities which included certain counterparty valuation adjustments. The decline in other, net for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019 was largely due to a decrease in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights in the first quarter of 2020. The Company uses derivatives to offset changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives were included in trading account activities.

14

Noninterest Expense

	For the Three Months Ended									For the Six Months Ended
					Increase (Decrease)									Increase (Decrease)
	June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019							June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)					Amount			Percent						Amount			Percent
Salaries and employee benefits	$	697	$	696	$	1		—	%	$	1,373	$	1,381	$	(8	)	(1	)%
Net occupancy and equipment	106		103		3			3		222		215		7			3
Professional and outside services	173		161		12			7		345		321		24			7
Software	85		72		13			18		175		152		23			15
Regulatory assessments	17		12		5			42		30		28		2			7
Intangible asset amortization	5		10		(5		)	(50	)	12		17		(5		)	(29	)
Other	95		100		(5		)	(5	)	222		210		12			6
Total noninterest expense	$	1,178	$	1,154	$	24		2		$	2,379	$	2,324	$	55		2

The increase in noninterest expense for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 compared with 2019 was largely driven by increases in costs associated with services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd. under the master services agreement and impairment of a retail credit card intangible in the first quarter of 2020.

Income Tax Expense

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, income tax expense was $64 million and the effective tax rate was negative 28% primarily due to excess tax credits that will be recognized during the year. In the second quarter of 2020, income tax expense was $39 million and the effective tax rate was 68%, reflecting the impact of a decrease in the effective tax rate from negative 9% as of March 31, 2020 to negative 28% as of June 30, 2020. In the second quarter of 2019, income tax expense was $20 million and the effective tax rate was 9%. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, income tax expense was $48 million and the effective tax rate was 11%.

For additional information regarding income tax expense, see "Income Tax Expense" in Part II, Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", “The changes in the U.S. tax laws, the majority of which were effective January 1, 2018, will impact our business and results of operations in a variety of ways, some of which are expected to be positive and others which may be negative” and “Our effective tax rates and our future results can also be affected by our participation for state income tax purposes as a member of MUFG’s unitary group in the U.S. and by other factors” in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" and Note 17 "Income Taxes" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

15

Balance Sheet Analysis

Securities

Our securities portfolio is primarily used for liquidity and interest rate risk management purposes, to invest cash resulting from excess liquidity, and to a lesser extent, to support our business development objectives. We strive to maximize total return while managing this objective within appropriate risk parameters. Securities available for sale are substantially comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, RMBSs, CMBSs, Cash Flow CLOs, and direct bank purchase bonds. Direct bank purchase bonds are instruments that are issued in bond form, accounted for as securities, but underwritten as loans with features that are typically found in commercial loans, and are subject to national bank regulatory lending authority standards. These instruments typically are not issued in bearer form, nor are they registered with the SEC or the Depository Trust Company. Additionally, these instruments generally contain certain transferability restrictions and are not assigned external credit ratings. Securities held to maturity consist of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities and U.S. government-sponsored agency RMBSs and CMBSs.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, and securities pledged as collateral, are detailed in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements" in this Form 10-Q.

Loans Held for Investment

The following table shows loans held for investment outstanding by loan type at the end of each period presented.

	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)					Amount			Percent
Loans held for investment:
Commercial and industrial	$	29,464	$	26,338	$	3,126		12	%
Commercial mortgage	16,683		16,895		(212		)	(1	)
Construction	1,712		1,511		201			13
Lease financing	1,027		1,001		26			3
Total commercial portfolio	48,886		45,745		3,141			7
Residential mortgage and home equity (1)	33,794		38,018		(4,224		)	(11	)
Other consumer (2)	3,855		4,450		(595		)	(13	)
Total consumer portfolio	37,649		42,468		(4,819		)	(11	)
Total loans held for investment (3)	$	86,535	$	88,213	$	(1,678	)	(2	)

(1) Includes home equity loans of $1,874 million and $2,049 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

(2) Other consumer loans substantially include unsecured consumer loans and consumer credit cards.

(3) Includes $199 million and $320 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, for net unamortized (discounts) and premiums and deferred (fees) and costs.

Loans held for investment decreased from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020, primarily due to a reduction in the residential mortgage and home equity and other consumer portfolios, partially offset by an increase in the commercial and industrial loan portfolio. The increase in commercial and industrial loans is primarily due to $2.2 billion of PPP loans outstanding at June 30, 2020.

16

Deposits

The table below presents our deposits as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

					Increase (Decrease)
	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)					Amount			Percent
Interest checking	$	5,493	$	4,725	$	768		16	%
Money market	38,275		35,002		3,273			9
Total interest bearing transaction and money market accounts	43,768		39,727		4,041			10
Savings	9,823		8,962		861			10
Time	10,024		15,651		(5,627		)	(36	)
Total interest bearing deposits	63,615		64,340		(725		)	(1	)
Noninterest bearing deposits	38,957		31,521		7,436			24
Total deposits	$	102,572	$	95,861	$	6,711		7

Total deposits increased $6.7 billion from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020 due largely to Regional Bank and Transaction Banking increases in noninterest bearing deposits and interest bearing transaction and money market accounts and saving accounts. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in time deposits due to decreases in Regional Bank time deposits, including PurePoint Financial, the direct banking division of the Bank, and a decrease in brokered deposits.

Securities Financing Arrangements

The Company enters into securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and securities borrowing and lending transactions to facilitate customer match-book activity, cover short positions and fund the Company's trading inventory. These balances are almost entirely attributable to MUSA. See Note 5 "Securities Financing Arrangements" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements" in this Form 10-Q for additional information.

Capital Management

Both MUAH and MUB are subject to various capital adequacy regulations issued by the U.S. federal banking agencies, including requirements to complete an annual capital plan and to maintain minimum regulatory capital ratios. As of June 30, 2020, management believes the capital ratios of MUAH and MUB exceeded all regulatory requirements of “well-capitalized” institutions.

MUAH is subject to regulatory requirements to develop and maintain a capital plan which must be reviewed and approved by its Board of Directors (or designated subcommittee thereof). The Board of Directors approved the Company's annual capital plan in March 2020. Under the Tailoring Rules of the Federal Reserve, MUAH, as a Category IV firm, is subject to CCAR supervisory capital planning requirements and stress testing submission requirements on an every other year basis in even years (e.g. MUAH is subject to the 2020 CCAR cycle). CCAR assesses capital adequacy levels under various scenarios to determine if BHCs would have sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial market stress. The Company's 2020 CCAR submission encompassed a range of expected and stressed economic and financial market scenarios, and included an assessment of expected sources and uses of capital over a prescribed planning horizon, a description of all capital actions within that time frame, and a discussion of any proposed business plan changes that are likely to have a material impact on capital adequacy. The Company timely filed its annual capital plan under the Federal Reserve's CCAR program in April 2020. In June 2020, the Company received notice that the Federal Reserve completed its review of the Company's capital plan and notice of its preliminary stress capital buffer requirement which will become effective October 1, 2020. Due to the significant uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve is requiring all CCAR firms, including MUAH, to conduct additional stress testing and to resubmit their capital plans to the Federal Reserve within 45 days after the Federal Reserve releases new supervisory scenarios. For additional information regarding the Company's capital plan, see "Supervision and Regulation - Dodd-Frank Act and Related Regulations" and "Supervision and Regulation - Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Standards - Capital Planning and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review Program" in Part I, Item 1. "Business" of our 2019 Form 10-K.

17

MUAH and MUB are required to maintain minimum capital ratios under the standardized approach in accordance with the BCBS capital guidelines for U.S. banking organizations issued by the U.S. federal banking agencies (U.S. Basel III Rules). Among other requirements, the U.S. Basel III Rules require a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% (for a total minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%) and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. Effective October 1, 2020, the capital conservation buffer will be replaced by MUAH's standardized capital conservation buffer, which will in part be informed by MUAH's final stress capital buffer requirement. For purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios, the Company has elected to phase-in the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, over a five-year period as permitted by the U.S. regulatory banking agencies. The impact is reflected in the June 30, 2020 capital ratios presented below.

The following tables summarize the calculation of MUAH’s risk-based capital ratios in accordance with the U.S. Basel III Rules as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation

	U.S. Basel III
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Capital Components
Common Equity Tier 1 capital	$	15,022	$	15,086
Tier 1 capital	$	15,022	$	15,086
Tier 2 capital	1,214		683
Total risk-based capital	$	16,236	$	15,769
Risk-weighted assets	$	103,761	$	107,023
Average total assets for leverage capital purposes	$	167,938	$	169,807

	U.S. Basel III								Minimum Capital Requirement with Capital Conservation Buffer (1)
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019				June 30, 2020
Capital Ratios	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio
Common Equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	15,022	14.48	%	$	15,086	14.10	%	≥	$	7,263	7.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	15,022		14.48		15,086		14.10		≥	8,820		8.50
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	16,236		15.65		15,769		14.73		≥	10,895		10.50
Tier 1 leverage(2)	15,022		8.94		15,086		8.88		≥	6,718		4.00

(1)The minimum capital requirement includes a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%.

(2)Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average assets (excluding certain disallowed assets, primarily goodwill and other intangibles).

18

The following tables summarize the calculation of MUB’s risk-based capital ratios in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the U.S. Basel III Rules as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

MUFG Union Bank, N.A.

	U.S. Basel III
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Capital Components
Common Equity Tier 1 capital	$	13,941	$	14,115
Tier 1 capital	$	13,941	$	14,115
Tier 2 capital	1,166		631
Total risk-based capital	$	15,107	$	14,746
Risk-weighted assets	$	94,941	$	97,563
Average total assets for leverage capital purposes	$	137,355	$	132,590

	U.S. Basel III								Minimum Capital Requirement with Capital Conservation Buffer (1)					To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019				June 30, 2020
Capital Ratios	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio		Amount			Ratio
Common Equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	13,941	14.68	%	$	14,115	14.47	%	≥	$	6,646	7.00	%	≥	$	6,171	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	13,941		14.68		14,115		14.47		≥	8,070		8.50		≥	7,595		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	15,107		15.91		14,746		15.11		≥	9,969		10.50		≥	9,494		10.00
Tier 1 leverage(2)	13,941		10.15		14,115		10.65		≥	5,494		4.00		≥	6,868		5.00

(1)The minimum capital requirement includes a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%.

(2)Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average assets (excluding certain disallowed assets, primarily goodwill and other intangibles).

19

In addition to capital ratios determined in accordance with regulatory requirements, we consider the tangible common equity ratio when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy. This capital ratio is monitored by management, and presented below, to further facilitate the understanding of our capital structure and for use in assessing and comparing the quality and composition of the Company’s capital structure to other financial institutions. This ratio is not codified within GAAP or federal banking regulations in effect at June 30, 2020. Therefore, it is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. Our tangible common equity ratio calculation method may differ from those used by other financial services companies.

The following table summarizes the calculation of the Company's tangible common equity ratio as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)
Total MUAH stockholders' equity	$	16,658		$	16,280
Less: Goodwill	1,764			1,764
Less: Intangible assets, except mortgage servicing rights	221			261
Less: Deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill and intangible assets	(21		)	(17		)
Tangible common equity (a)	$	14,694		$	14,272
Total assets	$	167,350		$	170,810
Less: Goodwill	1,764			1,764
Less: Intangible assets, except mortgage servicing rights	221			261
Less: Deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill and intangible assets	(21		)	(17		)
Tangible assets (b)	$	165,386		$	168,802
Tangible common equity ratio (a)/(b)	8.88		%	8.45		%

For additional information regarding our regulatory capital requirements, see "Supervision and Regulation – Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Standards" in Part I, Item 1. "Business" in our 2019 Form 10-K.

Risk Management

All financial institutions must manage and control a variety of business risks that can significantly affect their financial condition and performance. Some of the key risks that the Company must manage include credit, market, liquidity, operational, interest rate, compliance, reputation and strategic risks. The Board, directly or through its appropriate committees, provides oversight and approves our various risk management policies. Management has established a risk management structure that is designed to provide a comprehensive approach for identifying, measuring, monitoring, controlling and reporting on the significant risks faced by the Company. For additional information regarding our risk management structure and framework, see “Risk Management” in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2019 Form 10-K. For additional information regarding risks related to our business, please refer to Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2019 Form 10-K, and "Risk Factors" in Part II, Item 1A. in this Form 10-Q.

Credit Risk Management

One of our principal business activities is the extension of credit to individuals and businesses. Our policies and the applicable laws and regulations governing the extension of credit require risk analysis, including an extensive evaluation of the purpose of the request and the borrower’s ability and willingness to repay as scheduled. Our process also includes ongoing portfolio and credit management through portfolio diversification, lending limit constraints, credit review and approval policies, and extensive internal monitoring. For additional information regarding our credit risk management policies, see “Credit Risk Management” in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

20

Allowance for Credit Losses

Allowance Policy and Methodology

     We maintain an allowance for credit losses (defined as both the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments) to absorb expected losses on the loan portfolio as well as for unfunded credit commitments. On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which provided new guidance on the accounting for credit losses for instruments that are within its scope. This new guidance, commonly referred to as the CECL model, requires an entity to recognize its estimate of credit losses expected over the life of the financial instrument or exposure by incorporating forward-looking information in the entity's assessment of the collectability of financial assets. Accordingly, the Company's methodology for estimating the allowance balance uses relevant available information, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made over a forecast period to account for differences between current and expected future conditions and those reflected in historical loss information. Beyond the forecast period, estimated expected credit losses revert to historical loss experience.

Management establishes the allowance by first dividing its portfolio into two segments - the commercial segment and consumer segment. The allowance is measured on a collective basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. While the Company's methodology attributes portions of the allowance to specific portfolio segments, the allowance estimate is provided to cover all credit losses expected in the loan portfolio.

An expected loss approach is used to estimate the collectively-assessed allowance for both the commercial and consumer portfolio segments. Expected loss is calculated as the product of PD, LGD, and EAD modeled parameters that are projected on a monthly basis over the assets’ remaining contractual lives. The sum of each month’s expected loss calculation results in the collectively-assessed allowance estimate. Expected loss models use historical loss information and economic assumptions to estimate PD, LGD, and EAD. These models are tailored to different loan segments, classes and products by changing the economic variables or their weighting in the calculation used to estimate expected losses.

The CECL adoption impact was estimated using a 36-month forecast period. The forecast period was shortened to 24-months in the first quarter of 2020 due to heightened volatility and uncertainty in the economy from the emergence of COVID-19. Beyond the economic forecast, the allowance methodology reverts to average historical loss experience on a straight-line basis over a 24-month period. These timeframes are regularly reviewed and approved by management and may be adjusted if economic conditions warrant. Expected prepayments are incorporated into the estimation of the EAD for each asset over the asset’s remaining term. Contractual term is not adjusted for expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless we have a reasonable expectation that a TDR will be executed with a borrower.

Management implements qualitative adjustments to the collectively-assessed allowance to account for risks not incorporated in the model between current conditions and those reflected in the historical loss information used to estimate the models. These qualitative factors include changes in credit policies, problem loan trends, identification of new risks not incorporated into the modeling framework, credit concentrations, changes in lending management and other external factors. Qualitative adjustments are also used to adjust the collectively-assessed allowance to account for risks attributed to imprecision in the economic forecast and when risks emerge that impact specific portfolio components (i.e., natural disasters).

Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated individually to determine the allowance balance. Loans assessed individually include larger nonaccruing loans within the commercial portfolio, TDRs, reasonably expected TDRs and collateral-dependent loans. The allowance for individually assessed loans is generally determined using either discounted cash flow analyses or collateral valuations to determine if loan carrying values exceed what the Company expects to collect.

21

For additional information on the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for credit losses, see "Critical Accounting Estimates" in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations", Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations" and Note 3 "Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Allowance and Related Provision for Credit Losses

The Company recorded an increase to the allowance for credit losses of $199 million upon the January 1, 2020 adoption of ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, primarily due to an increase in the allowance for consumer loans. This increase consisted of a $229 million increase in the allowance for loan losses and a $30 million decrease in the allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments. The provision for credit losses was $361 million and $831 million for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020, respectively, consisting of a provision for loan losses of $353 million and a provision for losses on unfunded credit commitments of $8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and a provision for loan losses of $801 million and a provision for losses on unfunded credit commitments of $30 million for the six months endedJune 30, 2020.

The provision for loan losses was $264 million and $538 million for the commercial loan segment and $89 million and $263 million for the consumer loan segment for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020, respectively, largely due to the impact of COVID-19 and the corresponding deterioration in the economic environment on the allowance for loan losses. The economic forecast incorporated management's expectations at June 30, 2020 which included a sharp increase in the unemployment rate during 2020, with a modest recovery emerging in late 2020 and continuing into subsequent years. At March 31, 2020 management expected lower unemployment and a quicker recovery. Downgrades also contributed to the commercial segment provision. The collectively-assessed allowance for credit losses estimate also incorporated management’s qualitatively-determined model input adjustments and overlays that reflect the anticipated loss mitigating impact of monetary and fiscal stimulus policies and loan modification programs as a result of COVID-19 that are not otherwise incorporated into the collectively-assessed modeling methodology.

The allowance for loan losses was $1,452 million at June 30, 2020, compared with $538 million at December 31, 2019, prior to the $229 million increase upon adopting ASU 2016-13. Our ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment was 1.68% as of June 30, 2020 and 0.61% as of December 31, 2019. Our ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment was 1.80% as of June 30, 2020 and 0.73% as of December 31, 2019. Net loans charged off to average total loans held for investment were (0.24)% and (0.26)% for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020, respectively, compared with 0.09% for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2019.

22

Change in the Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in our allowance for loan losses.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2020			2019
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	1,152		$	516		$	538		$	474
Cumulative effect from adoption of ASU 2016-13 (1)	—			—			229			—
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period, adjusted for adoption of ASU 2016-13 (1)	1,152			516			767			474
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	353			66			801			125
Loans charged off:
Commercial and industrial	(4		)	(5		)	(36		)	(7		)
Commercial and industrial - transfer to held for sale	—			(9		)	—			(17		)
Commercial mortgage	—			—			—			(1		)
Construction	(10		)	—			(10		)	—
Total commercial portfolio	(14		)	(14		)	(46		)	(25		)
Residential mortgage and home equity	1			1			2			1
Other consumer	(46		)	(22		)	(88		)	(39		)
Total consumer portfolio	(45		)	(21		)	(86		)	(38		)
Total loans charged-off	(59		)	(35		)	(132		)	(63		)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Commercial and industrial	3			12			9			21
Construction	—			—			1			—
Total commercial portfolio	3			12			10			21
Other consumer	3			3			6			5
Total consumer portfolio	3			3			6			5
Total recoveries of loans previously charged-off	6			15			16			26
Net loans recovered (charged-off)	(53		)	(20		)	(116		)	(37		)
Ending balance of allowance for loan losses	1,452			562			1,452			562
Allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments	109			108			109			108
Total allowance for credit losses	$	1,561		$	670		$	1,561		$	670

(1) For further information see Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements" in this Form 10-Q.

23

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and OREO. Nonaccrual loans are those for which management has discontinued accrual of interest because there exists significant uncertainty as to the full and timely collection of either principal or interest, or such loans have become contractually past due 90 days with respect to principal or interest. OREO includes property where the Bank acquired title through foreclosure or “deed in lieu” of foreclosure. For a more detailed discussion of the accounting for nonaccrual loans, see Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

The following table sets forth the components of nonperforming assets, TDRs, criticized assets and certain credit ratios.

	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019			Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in millions)							Amount			Percent
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	222		$	175		$	47		27	%
Commercial mortgage	147			15			132			880
Construction	45			—			45			100
Total commercial portfolio	414			190			224			118
Residential mortgage and home equity	206			137			69			50
Other consumer	1			1			—			—
Total consumer portfolio	207			138			69			50
Total nonaccrual loans	621			328			293			89
OREO	—			1			(1		)	(100	)
Total nonperforming assets	$	621		$	329		$	292		89
Troubled debt restructurings:
Accruing	$	317		$	392		$	(75	)	(19	)%
Nonaccruing (included in total nonaccrual loans above)	253			171			82			48
Total troubled debt restructurings	$	570		$	563		$	7		1
Criticized credits	$	3,831		$	1,567		$	2,264		144
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans	233.74		%	164.19		%
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans	251.28			197.34
Nonperforming assets to total loans held for investment and OREO	0.72			0.37
Nonperforming assets to total assets	0.37			0.19
Nonaccrual loans to total loans held for investment	0.72			0.37

The increase in criticized credits is primarily due to COVID-19 related downgrades in the commercial real estate and aviation sectors. See Note 3 "Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” in this Form 10-Q for a description of criticized credits.

24

Troubled Debt Restructurings

TDRs are loans where we have granted a concession to a borrower as a result of the borrower experiencing financial difficulty and, consequently, we receive less than the current market-based compensation for loans with similar risk characteristics. Such loans are reviewed for impairment either individually or in pools with similar risk characteristics. Our loss mitigation strategies are designed to minimize economic loss and, at times, may result in changes to the original terms, including interest rate changes, maturity extensions, forbearance, principal paydowns, covenant waivers or changes, payment deferrals, or some combination thereof. We evaluate whether these changes to the terms and conditions of our loans meet the TDR criteria after considering the specific situation of the borrower and all relevant facts and circumstances related to the modification. For our consumer portfolio segment, TDRs are typically initially placed on nonaccrual and a minimum of six consecutive months of sustained performance is required before returning to accrual status. For our commercial portfolio segment, we generally determine accrual status for TDRs by performing an individual assessment of each loan, which may include, among other factors, borrower performance under previous loan terms.

The following table provides a summary of TDRs by loan type, including nonaccrual loans and loans that have been returned to accrual status, as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. See Note 3 "Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” in this Form 10-Q for additional information.

					As a Percentage of Ending Loan Balances
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	147	$	140	0.48	%	0.51	%
Commercial mortgage	170		168		1.02		0.99
Construction	52		62		3.04		4.10
Total commercial portfolio	369		370		0.76		0.81
Residential mortgage and home equity	200		192		0.59		0.51
Other consumer	1		1		0.03		0.02
Total consumer portfolio	201		193		0.53		0.45
Total restructured loans	$	570	$	563	0.66		0.64

On March 22, 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued joint guidance advising that the agencies have confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications due to COVID-19 made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current prior to relief, are not TDRs. On March 27, 2020 the CARES Act, which provides relief from TDR classification for certain COVID-19 related loan modifications, was signed into law. At June 30, 2020, $2.7 billion of modified commercial loans and $3.8 billion of modified consumer loans were not classified as TDRs since the modifications, which were largely payment deferrals, met the criteria under either the CARES Act or the criteria specified by the regulatory agencies. For loan modifications that include a payment deferral and are not TDRs, the borrower’s past due and nonaccrual status will not be impacted during the deferral period. Interest income will continue to be recognized over the contractual life of the loan.

Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing Interest

Loans held for investment 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest totaled $74 million and $20 million at June 30, 2020 and at December 31, 2019, respectively.

Concentration of Risk

Commercial and industrial loans are extended principally to corporations, middle-market businesses and small businesses and are originated primarily through our commercial banking offices. Our commercial and industrial portfolio is comprised primarily of the following industry sectors: finance and insurance, manufacturing, real estate and leasing, power and utilities, and wholesale trade. No individual industry sector exceeded 10% of our total loans held for investment at either June 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

25

Construction and commercial mortgage loans are secured by deeds of trust or mortgages. Construction loans are extended primarily to commercial property developers and to residential builders. At June 30, 2020, 86% of the Company’s construction loan portfolio was concentrated in California, 4% to borrowers in Oregon and 3% to borrowers in Colorado. The commercial mortgage loan portfolio consists of loans secured by commercial income properties. At June 30, 2020, 65% of the Company’s commercial mortgage loans were made to borrowers located in California, 7% to borrowers in Washington, and 6% to borrowers in New York.

Residential mortgage loans are originated and secured by one-to-four family residential properties, through our multi-channel network, including branches, private bankers, mortgage brokers, telephone services, and web-based and mobile internet banking applications. We do not have a program for originating or purchasing subprime loan products and we hold the majority of the loans we originate. At December 31, 2019, substantially all our residential mortgage loans were made to borrowers in California.

At June 30, 2020, payment terms on 37% of our residential mortgage loans required a monthly payment that covers the full amount of interest due, but did not reduce the principal balance. At origination, these interest-only loans had strong credit profiles and had weighted average LTV ratios of approximately 64%. The remainder of the portfolio consisted of regularly amortizing loans.

Home equity loans are originated principally through our branch network and private banking offices. Approximately 25% of these home equity loans and lines were supported by first liens on residential properties as of both June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. To manage risk associated with lending commitments, we review all equity-secured lines annually for creditworthiness and may reduce or freeze limits, to the extent permitted by laws and regulations.

Other consumer loans substantially include unsecured consumer loans and consumer credit cards. The Company manages risk associated with these loans by establishing lending criteria similar to other consumer loans originated by the Company.

See Note 3 "Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” in this Form 10-Q for additional information on refreshed FICO scores for our consumer portfolio segment and refreshed LTV ratios for our residential mortgage and home equity loans at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Market Risk Management

The objective of market risk management is to mitigate any adverse impact on earnings and capital arising from changes in interest rates and other market variables. Market risk management supports our broad objective of enhancing shareholder value, which encompasses the achievement of stable earnings growth while promoting capital stability over time. Market risk is defined as the risk of loss arising from an adverse change in the market value of financial instruments caused by fluctuations in market prices or rates. The primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from instruments, positions and transactions entered into for purposes other than trading and for trading. Other than trading interest rate risk arises from loans, securities, deposits, borrowings, securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities borrowing and lending transactions, derivative instruments and mortgage servicing rights. Trading interest rate risk primarily arises from trading activities at MUAH's broker-dealer subsidiary, MUSA, and derivative contracts MUB enters into as a financial intermediary for customers.

LIBOR Transition

In July 2017, the Chief Executive of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the process of setting LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve and Federal Reserve Bank of New York convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a group of private-market participants, to help ensure a successful transition from USD LIBOR to a more robust reference rate. The Company recognizes that discontinuance of LIBOR, or any other IBOR-based rate, presents significant risks and challenges that could have an impact on its businesses globally (for information about the risks to the Company from the discontinuation of LIBOR or any other benchmark, see "The replacement of LIBOR could adversely impact our business and results of operations, and the value of certain financial instruments" in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2019 Form 10-K). We have exposure to IBORs, including in financial instruments and contracts that mature after 2021.

26

Our exposures arise from business loans, derivatives, securities and other financial products (such as residential adjustable rate mortgages).

Accordingly, to facilitate an orderly transition from LIBOR and other benchmark rates to alternative reference rates, the Company has established a firm-wide transition program to identify, assess and monitor risks associated with the expected discontinuation or unavailability of benchmarks, including LIBOR, develop and implement plans to remediate existing products or contracts that reference or rely upon IBORs, develop products and services that use alternative reference rates, achieve systems and operational readiness and engage impacted clients in connection with the transition to alternative reference rates. The Company’s transition program was established by senior management and periodic updates are provided to the Company's Board of Directors and ECA. The transition program focuses on:

• Identifying and evaluating the scope of existing financial instruments and contracts that may be affected;

• Assessing the impacted financial instruments and contracts to determine if they contain or require appropriate fallback language;

• Amending or otherwise developing action plans to amend existing financial instruments and contracts to incorporate robust fallback language;

• Enhancing infrastructure (e.g., internal framework such as models, technology infrastructure) to prepare for a smooth transition to alternative reference rates; and

• Developing financial instruments and contracts to use alternative reference rates.

The Company has identified the inherent risks with this transition and continues to monitor the development and usage of alternative reference rates. The Company is also working with regulators, industry working groups and trade associations to develop strategies for an effective transition to alternative reference rates. For additional information regarding our market risk management policies, see “Market Risk Management” in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity risk is the risk that an institution's financial condition or overall safety and soundness is adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet its contractual, including contingent, obligations. The objective of liquidity risk management is to maintain a sufficient amount of liquidity and diversity of funding sources to allow an institution to meet obligations in both stable and adverse conditions.

The management of liquidity risk is governed by MUAH ALM and Liquidity Risk Management Policies. The MUAH ALM Policy is under the oversight of ALCO, which oversees first line liquidity risk management activities conducted by Treasury. Treasury formulates the funding, liquidity and contingency planning strategies for the Company, the Bank and MUSA, and is responsible for identifying, managing and reporting on liquidity risk. The Liquidity Risk Management Policies for the Company, the Bank and MUSA are under the oversight of the ARC and the Risk Committee of the Board. MRM conducts independent oversight and governance of liquidity risk management activities to establish sound policies and effective risk and independent monitoring controls. We are also subject to a Contingency Funding Plan framework that identifies actions to be taken to help ensure adequate liquidity if an event should occur that disrupts or adversely affects the normal funding activities of the Company, the Bank or MUSA.

Liquidity risk is managed using a total balance sheet perspective that analyzes all sources and uses of liquidity including loans, investments, deposits and borrowings, as well as off-balance sheet exposures. Although we make an effort to diversify our sources of liquidity, as discussed below, we are required to maintain a minimum amount of TLAC-eligible debt due to affiliates. Various tools are used to measure and monitor liquidity, including forecasting of the sources and uses of cash flows over multiple time horizons and stress testing of the forecasts under various scenarios. Stress testing, which incorporates both institution-specific, and systemic market scenarios, as well as a combination scenario that adversely affects the Company's liquidity position and profile, facilitates the identification of appropriate remedial measures to help ensure that the Company maintains adequate liquidity in adverse conditions. Such measures may include extending the maturity profile of liabilities, optimizing liability levels through pricing strategies, adding new funding sources, altering dependency on certain funding sources, adjusting asset growth and financing or selling assets.

27

We are subject to the Federal Reserve's rules imposing TLAC requirements on GSIBs with operations in the U.S., such as MUFG. These rules include an Internal TLAC requirement which sets a minimum amount of loss-absorbing instruments, which must be issued by the Company to MUFG or MUFG Bank, Ltd. (or another wholly-owned non-U.S. subsidiary of MUFG) due to MUFG's single point of entry resolution approach. These loss absorbing instruments are comprised of Tier 1 regulatory capital and long-term debt. TLAC Tier 1 regulatory capital is designed to absorb ongoing losses, while the conversion of TLAC-eligible long-term debt into common equity of the Company is intended to recapitalize the Company prior to any bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. See "Supervision and Regulation – Dodd-Frank Act and Related Regulations" in Part I, Item 1. "Business" in our 2019 Form 10-K for additional information.

We maintain a substantial level of available liquidity in the form of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet funding sources. Sources of liquidity include cash at the Federal Reserve, unencumbered liquid securities, and capacity to borrow on a secured basis at the FHLB of San Francisco and the Federal Reserve Bank’s Discount Window. Total unpledged securities were $20.8 billion at June 30, 2020. Our primary funding sources are customer deposits, secured FHLB advances, and unsecured short-term and long-term debt. Total deposits increased $6.7 billion from $95.9 billion at December 31, 2019 to $102.6 billion at June 30, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, the Bank had $8.4 billion of borrowings outstanding with the FHLB of San Francisco, and the Bank had a remaining unused borrowing capacity from the FHLB of San Francisco of $20.6 billion. The Bank maintains a $12.0 billion unsecured bank note program. Available funding under the bank note program was $3.6 billion at June 30, 2020. We do not have any firm commitments in place to sell additional notes under this program.

In addition to managing liquidity risk on a consolidated basis and at each of the major subsidiaries (the Bank and MUSA), we assess and monitor liquidity at MUAH and other non-bank subsidiaries. MUAH maintains sufficient liquidity to meet expected obligations, without access to the wholesale funding markets or dividends from subsidiaries, for at least 18 months. At June 30, 2020, the parent company’s liquidity exceeded 18 months.

MUAH and its subsidiaries may borrow on a long-term basis from MUFG Bank, Ltd. and affiliates. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had total long-term debt issued to MUFG Bank, Ltd. and affiliates of $7.3 billion.

The Company’s total wholesale funding included $16.6 billion of long-term debt (excluding nonrecourse debt) and $2.7 billion of short-term debt at June 30, 2020. For additional information regarding our outstanding debt, see Note 6 "Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Borrowings" and Note 7 "Long-Term Debt" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” in this Form 10-Q. We evaluate and monitor the stability and reliability of our various funding sources to help ensure that we have sufficient liquidity in adverse circumstances.

28

Our costs and ability to raise funds in the capital markets are influenced by our credit ratings. In April 2020, Fitch placed the ratings of MUAH, MUB and MUSA on ratings watch negative as a result of Fitch’s downgrade of MUFG’s ratings to A-/F1 outlook stable from A/F1 outlook negative. This action follows Fitch’s recent revision of the U.S. Bank Sector Outlook and Rating Outlook, both to negative from stable, driven by concerns over the financial impact from COVID-19. On May 1, 2020, Fitch affirmed MUAH, MUB and MUSA's long and short-term ratings. The ratings watch negative was removed on the long-term rating and a negative outlook was assigned. The negative outlook reflects Fitch's view that there are significant operating environment challenges due to the disruption to economic activity and financial markets from the coronavirus pandemic. On August 4, 2020, Fitch revised the outlook on MUFG’s ratings to negative from stable driven by the outlook revision on the Japan sovereign rating and the sensitivity of MUFG’s ratings to the downside. In April 2020, S&P revised the outlook on MUFG to stable from positive due to S&P’s expectation that economic strain from the COVID–19 pandemic will put prolonged pressure on asset quality and revenue lowering the likelihood of being upgraded. Subsequently, S&P revised MUAH, MUB, and MUSA’s outlook to stable from positive. The stable outlook reflects S&P’s expectation that MUAH will remain a core banking subsidiary of MUFG. Furthermore, any change in MUAH’s stand–alone credit profile will not affect MUAH's credit rating, which S&P believes will remain closely tied to MUFG. The following table provides our credit ratings as of June 30, 2020.

		MUFG Union Bank, N.A.		MUFG Securities Americas Inc.	MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
		Deposits	Senior Debt	Senior Debt	Senior Debt
S&P	Long-term	Not rated	A	A	A-
	Short-term	Not rated	A-1	A-1	A-2
Moody's	Long-term	Aa2	A2	Not rated	A2
	Short-term	P-1	P-1	Not rated	Not rated
Fitch	Long-term	A+	A	A	A
	Short-term	F1	F1	F1	F1

For additional information, including information about rating agency assessments, see “MUFG Bank Ltd.’s and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group’s credit ratings and financial or regulatory condition could adversely affect our operations” in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2019 Form 10-K and "Our credit ratings are important in order to maintain liquidity" in Part II, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of this Form 10-Q.

Operational Risk Management

Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk includes legal risk, but excludes strategic and reputation risk. In particular, information security is a significant operational risk element for the Company and includes the risk of losses resulting from cyber-attacks or other related cyber incidents. See “We are subject to a wide array of operational risks, including, but not limited to, cyber-security risks” in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our 2019 Form 10-K. Operational risk is mitigated through a system of internal controls that are designed to keep these risks at appropriate levels. For additional information regarding our operational risk management policies, see “Operational Risk Management” in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates

MUAH’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which includes management estimates and judgments. The financial information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on estimates used to measure the financial effects of transactions and events. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. Significant estimates that we use include assumptions used in measuring PD, LGD and EAD to estimate expected credit losses, the assumptions used in measuring our transfer pricing revenue, assumptions used in evaluating our goodwill for impairment, and assumptions regarding our effective tax rates. Actual results could differ significantly from our estimates.

Management has reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies and has discussed these policies with the Audit & Finance Committee.

29

Allowance for Credit Losses

Our allowance for credit losses is an estimate of the credit losses that are expected over the life of the financial instrument or exposure and has three components: the allowance for loans measured on a collective basis, when similar risk characteristics exist, the allowance for loans measured on an individual basis, for loans that do not share similar risk characteristics, and the allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments, which is included in other liabilities.

The Company's methodology for estimating credit losses uses relevant available information relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made over a forecast period to account for differences between current and expected future conditions and those reflected in historical loss information. Beyond the forecast period, estimated expected credit losses revert to average historical loss experience. To estimate the collectively-assessed allowance, expected loss is calculated as the product of PD, LGD, and EAD modeled parameters that are projected on a monthly basis over the assets’ remaining contractual lives.

Expected loss models incorporate significant assumptions over the forecast period based on management’s expectations. Estimating losses as of March 31, 2020 was particularly challenging due to the heightened volatility and uncertainty in the economy from the emergence of COVID-19. Significant management assumptions during the forecast period include GDP, unemployment, the duration of economic weakness, and the strength and timing of the following economic recovery. Management adjusted expected loss model calculations by incorporating qualitatively determined model input adjustments and overlays that reflect management’s expectations of the loss mitigating impact of monetary and fiscal stimulus policies and loan modification programs as a result of COVID-19 that are not otherwise incorporated into the modeling methodology. The Company also shortened the forecast period to 24 months during the first quarter of 2020, compared with 36 months upon adoption of ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2020. Changes in these estimates could significantly impact our allowance and provision for credit losses.

For further information regarding our allowance for loan losses, see "Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Allowance for Credit Losses" in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, "Allowance for Loan Losses" in Note 1 and Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Goodwill Impairment

We allocate our goodwill to reporting units and review for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Goodwill is assessed for impairment at the reporting unit level either qualitatively or quantitatively. If the elected qualitative assessment results indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the quantitative impairment test is required. Various valuation methodologies are applied to carry out the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill.

Management applies significant judgment when estimating the fair value of its reporting units. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, incorporating general economic and market conditions, identifying relevant market comparables, and selecting an appropriate control premium. Imprecision in estimating these factors can affect the estimated fair value of the reporting units.

The Company continuously monitors inputs used when performing its annual goodwill impairment analysis such as the cash flow projections and market comparables developed to estimate the fair value of its reporting units. When a disruption in the Company’s business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, or significant trends become apparent that may negatively affect those projections, the Company may have to assess the need to perform the quantitative impairment test to conclude whether the fair value of the reporting unit is still above its carrying amount. The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of April 1, 2020 and concluded its goodwill was not impaired. However, the Company's Commercial Banking and Real Estate Industries and Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S. reporting units' estimated fair values did not significantly exceed their carrying amounts and management continues to monitor these reporting units closely.

30

Understanding our accounting policies is fundamental to understanding our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, both our critical accounting estimates and our significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in our 2019 Form 10-K. There were no material changes to our transfer pricing, goodwill impairment analysis, or income taxes critical accounting estimates during the second quarter of 2020.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following table presents a reconciliation between certain GAAP amounts and specific non-GAAP measures used to calculate return on average MUAH tangible common equity for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019. Management believes that this ratio provides useful supplemental information regarding the Company's business results.

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019			June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019
Net (loss) income attributable to MUAH	$	22		$	199		$	(284	)	$	383
Add: Intangible asset amortization, net of tax	4			7			9			12
Net (loss) income attributable to MUAH, excluding intangible asset amortization (a)	$	26		$	206		$	(275	)	$	395
Average MUAH stockholders' equity	$	16,849		$	17,120		$	16,688		$	16,920
Less: Goodwill	1,764			3,375			1,764			3,371
Less: Intangible assets, except mortgage servicing rights	224			283			241			289
Less: Deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill and intangible assets	(20		)	(61		)	(19		)	(60		)
Average MUAH tangible common equity (b)	$	14,881		$	13,523		$	14,702		$	13,320
Return on average MUAH tangible common equity (1) (a)/(b)	0.70		%	6.09		%	(3.74		)%	5.93		%

(1)     Annualized.

The following table shows the calculation of the adjusted efficiency ratio for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019. Management believes adjusting the efficiency ratio for the fees and costs associated with services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd. branches in the U.S. enhances the comparability of MUAH's efficiency ratio when compared with other financial institutions.

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019			June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019
Noninterest expense (a)	$	1,178		$	1,154		$	2,379		$	2,324
Less: Costs associated with services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd. branches in the U.S.	342			323			661			633
Noninterest expense, as adjusted (b)	$	836		$	831		$	1,718		$	1,691
Total revenue (c)	$	1,596		$	1,426		$	2,982		$	2,841
Less: Fees from affiliates for services provided to MUFG Bank, Ltd.'s branches in the U.S.	369			342			708			668
Total revenue, as adjusted (d)	$	1,227		$	1,084		$	2,274		$	2,173
Efficiency ratio (a)/(c)	73.82		%	80.94		%	79.78		%	81.80		%
Adjusted efficiency ratio (b)/(d)	68.14		%	76.68		%	75.55		%	77.82		%

Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

We are disclosing the following information pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, which requires an issuer to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. government under specified Executive Orders. The scope of activities that must be reported includes activities not prohibited by U.S. law and

31

conducted outside the United States in compliance with applicable local law. Because we are indirectly wholly-owned by MUFG, a Japanese corporation, our disclosure is required to include, in addition to our activities, transactions or dealings, those conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates of MUFG which are not controlled by us. We have requested that MUFG provide us a description of reportable activity under Section 13(r) and have received the following information:

During the quarter ended June 30, 2020, MUFG’s non-U.S. subsidiary, MUFG Bank, engaged in certain limited business activities with entities in, or affiliated with, Iran, including counterparties owned or controlled by the Iranian government. MUFG Bank has a limited number of letters of credit and guarantees and provides limited remittance and other settlement services mainly in connection with its Japanese customer transactions with counterparties in Iran, which transactions are reviewed to assess whether they are exempt from applicable Iran-related sanctions or otherwise permitted by OFAC. These transactions do not involve U.S. dollars or clearing services of U.S. banks for the settlement of payments. For the quarter ended June 30, 2020, the aggregate fee income relating to these transactions was less than ¥5 million, representing less than 0.001 percent of MUFG’s total fee income. In addition, some Iranian financial institutions and other entities in, or affiliated with, Iran maintained non-U.S. dollar correspondent accounts and other similar settlement accounts with MUFG Bank outside the United States. In addition to such accounts, MUFG Bank received deposits in Japan from, and provided settlement services in Japan to, fewer than 10 Iranian government-related entities and fewer than 100 Iranian government-related individuals such as Iranian diplomats, and maintains settlement accounts outside the United States for certain other financial institutions specified in Executive Order 13382, which settlement accounts were frozen in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. For the quarter ended June 30, 2020, the average aggregate balance of deposits held in these accounts represented less than 0.1 percent of the average balance of MUFG’s total deposits. The fee income from the transactions attributable to these account holders was less than ¥1 million, representing less than 0.001 percent of MUFG’s total fee income.

We understand that MUFG Bank recognizes that following the withdrawal in May 2018 by the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the United States has imposed secondary sanctions against non-U.S. persons who engage in or facilitate a broad range of transactions and activities involving Iran. We understand that MUFG Bank has taken the recent sanctions related developments into account and will continue to monitor transactions relating to Iran in order to comply with applicable U.S. and Japanese regulations as well as U.S., Japanese and other international sanctions.

Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The information called for by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2) of Form 10-Q.

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the second quarter of 2020, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

32

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.   Financial Statements

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020		2019		2020			2019
Interest Income
Loans	$	739	$	934	$	1,596		$	1,841
Securities	132		144		252			307
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	33		84		157			418
Trading assets	96		90		187			183
Other	9		50		42			91
Total interest income	1,009		1,302		2,234			2,840
Interest Expense
Deposits	97		215		269			399
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	9		52		36			108
Long-term debt	88		127		197			258
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	13		105		132			460
Trading liabilities	15		26		39			55
Total interest expense	222		525		673			1,280
Net Interest Income	787		777		1,561			1,560
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses	361		56		831			94
Net interest income after (reversal of) provision for credit losses	426		721		730			1,466
Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposit accounts	34		40		75			82
Trust and investment management fees	29		29		58			58
Trading account activities	37		17		1			36
Securities gains, net	57		22		110			23
Credit facility fees	26		24		50			47
Brokerage commissions and fees	15		19		33			39
Card processing fees, net	11		14		25			27
Investment banking and syndication fees	164		102		284			226
Fees from affiliates	393		353		754			695
Other, net	43		29		31			48
Total noninterest income	809		649		1,421			1,281
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits	697		696		1,373			1,381
Net occupancy and equipment	106		103		222			215
Professional and outside services	173		161		345			321
Software	85		72		175			152
Regulatory assessments	17		12		30			28
Intangible asset amortization	5		10		12			17
Other	95		100		222			210
Total noninterest expense	1,178		1,154		2,379			2,324
Income before income taxes and including noncontrolling interests	57		216		(228		)	423
Income tax expense (benefit)	39		20		64			48
Net Income (Loss) Including Noncontrolling Interests	18		196		(292		)	375
Deduct: Net loss (income) from noncontrolling interests	4		3		8			8
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to MUAH	$	22	$	199	$	(284	)	$	383

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

33

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2020			2019
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to MUAH	$	22		$	199		$	(284	)	$	383
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges	34			56			360			80
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities	179			146			437			298
Pension and other postretirement benefit adjustments	15			6			31			12
Other	—			—			—			1
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	228			208			828			391
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to MUAH	250			407			544			774
Comprehensive income (loss) from noncontrolling interests	(4		)	(3		)	(8		)	(8		)
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	246		$	404		$	536		$	766

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

34

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions, except per share amount)	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	2,055		$	2,457
Interest bearing deposits in banks	15,366			7,184
Total cash and cash equivalents	17,421			9,641
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	17,081			23,943
Trading account assets (includes $1,470 at June 30, 2020 and $887 at December 31, 2019 pledged as collateral that may be repledged)	12,453			10,377
Securities available for sale (includes $224 at June 30, 2020 and $142 at December 31, 2019 pledged as collateral that may be repledged)	15,629			17,789
Securities held to maturity (fair value $8,419 at June 30, 2020 and $9,508 at December 31, 2019)	8,105			9,421
Loans held for investment	86,535			88,213
Allowance for loan losses	(1,452		)	(538		)
Loans held for investment, net	85,083			87,675
Goodwill	1,764			1,764
Other assets	9,814			10,200
Total assets	$	167,350		$	170,810
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	38,957		$	31,521
Interest bearing	63,615			64,340
Total deposits	102,572			95,861
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	22,087			28,866
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	2,702			6,484
Long-term debt	16,785			17,129
Trading account liabilities	3,256			3,266
Other liabilities	3,211			2,837
Total liabilities	150,613			154,443
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees—See Note 12
Equity
MUAH stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock:
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, par value $1 per share:
Authorized 1,700,000,000 shares, 132,076,912 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019	132			132
Additional paid-in capital	8,204			8,222
Retained earnings	8,356			8,788
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(34		)	(862		)
Total MUAH stockholders' equity	16,658			16,280
Noncontrolling interests	79			87
Total equity	16,737			16,367
Total liabilities and equity	$	167,350		$	170,810

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

35

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2020
	MUAH Stockholders' Equity
(Dollars in millions)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance, March 31, 2019	$	132	$	8,193		$	9,713		$	(1,141	)	$	67		$	16,964
Net income (loss)	—		—			199			—			(3		)	196
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—			—			208			—			208
Compensation—restricted stock units	—		(36		)	(2		)	—			—			(38		)
Other	—		—			—			—			(1		)	(1		)
Net change	—		(36		)	197			208			(4		)	365
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	132	$	8,157		$	9,910		$	(933	)	$	63		$	17,329
Balance, March 31, 2020	$	132	$	8,239		$	8,339		$	(262	)	$	84		$	16,532
Net income (loss)	—		—			22			—			(4		)	18
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—			—			228			—			228
Compensation—restricted stock units	—		(36		)	(4		)	—			—			(40		)
Other	—		1			(1		)	—			(1		)	(1		)
Net change	—		(35		)	17			228			(5		)	205
Balance, June 30, 2020	$	132	$	8,204		$	8,356		$	(34	)	$	79		$	16,737

	MUAH Stockholders' Equity
(Dollars in millions)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2018	$	132	$	8,176		$	9,524		$	(1,324	)	$	72		$	16,580
Net income (loss)	—		—			383			—			(8		)	375
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—			—			391			—			391
Compensation—restricted stock units	—		(19		)	(2		)	—			—			(21		)
Other	—		—			5						(1		)	4
Net change	—		(19		)	386			391			(9		)	749
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	132	$	8,157		$	9,910		$	(933	)	$	63		$	17,329
Balance, December 31, 2019	$	132	$	8,222		$	8,788		$	(862	)	$	87		$	16,367
Cumulative effect from adoption of ASU 2016-13 (1)	—		—			(147		)	—			—			(147		)
Net income (loss)	—		—			(284		)	—			(8		)	(292		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—			—			828			—			828
Compensation—restricted stock units	—		(18		)	(4		)	—			—			(22		)
Other	—		—			3			—			—			3
Net change	—		(18		)	(432		)	828			(8		)	370
Balance, June 30, 2020	$	132	$	8,204		$	8,356		$	(34	)	$	79		$	16,737

(1) For further information see Note 1 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

36

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests	$	(292	)	$	375
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses	831			94
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net	300			248
Stock-based compensation—restricted stock units	42			41
Deferred income taxes	(232		)	(86		)
Net gains on sales of securities	(110		)	(23		)
Net decrease (increase) in securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	6,862			(1,638		)
Net decrease (increase) in securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	(6,779		)	1,632
Net decrease (increase) in trading account assets	(2,077		)	303
Net decrease (increase) in other assets	1,194			(317		)
Net increase (decrease) in trading account liabilities	(10		)	(222		)
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities	353			(96		)
Loans originated for sale	(2,560		)	(1,138		)
Net proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale	2,056			1,178
Pension and other benefits adjustment	(10		)	(21		)
Other, net	8			20
Total adjustments	(132		)	(25		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(424		)	350
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	3,375			2,862
Proceeds from paydowns and maturities of securities available for sale	1,226			1,257
Purchases of securities available for sale	(1,785		)	(2,623		)
Proceeds from paydowns and maturities of securities held to maturity	1,306			2,633
Purchases of securities held to maturity	—			(1,749		)
Proceeds from sales of loans	409			245
Net decrease (increase) in loans	1,449			(2,164		)
Purchases of other investments	(176		)	(55		)
Other, net	(145		)	(248		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	5,659			158
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits	6,711			3,608
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	(3,792		)	(595		)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	613			1,703
Repayment of long-term debt	(958		)	(3,559		)
Other, net	(50		)	(64		)
Change in noncontrolling interests	—			(1		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	2,524			1,092
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	7,759			1,600
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	9,695			8,398
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	17,454		$	9,998
Cash Paid During the Period For:
Interest	$	730		$	1,322
Income taxes, net	41			188
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Net transfer of loans held for investment to (from) loans held for sale	$	(44	)	$	319
Securities held to maturity transferred to securities available for sale	—			170
Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,421		$	9,955
Restricted cash included in other assets	33			43
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash per consolidated statement of cash flows	$	17,454		$	9,998

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

37

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations

MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation (MUAH) is a financial holding company, bank holding company and intermediate holding company whose principal subsidiaries are MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (MUB or the Bank) and MUFG Securities Americas Inc. (MUSA). MUAH provides a wide range of financial services to consumers, small businesses, middle-market companies and major corporations nationally and internationally. The Company also provides various business, banking, financial, administrative and support services, and facilities for MUFG Bank, Ltd. (formerly The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.) in connection with the operation and administration of MUFG Bank, Ltd.'s business in the U.S. (including MUFG Bank, Ltd.'s U.S. branches). All of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock are owned by MUFG Bank, Ltd. and MUFG. The unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation, its subsidiaries, and its consolidated variable interest entities (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Rules and Regulations of the SEC. However, they do not include all of the disclosures necessary for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the second quarter of 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results anticipated for the full year. These unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2019 Form 10-K).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP also requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Although such estimates contemplate current conditions and management’s expectations of how they may change in the future, it is reasonably possible that actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. This could materially affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition in the near term. Critical estimates made by management in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements include, but are not limited to, the allowance for credit losses (Note 3 "Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses"), goodwill impairment, fair value of financial instruments (Note 8 "Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments"), pension accounting (Note 11 "Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits"), income taxes, and transfer pricing.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Allowance for loan losses

Allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the assets’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are charged off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off.

Management develops and documents its systematic methodology for determining the allowance by

first dividing its portfolio into two segments - the commercial segment and consumer segment. The Company

further divides its portfolio segments into classes based on initial measurement attributes, risk characteristics or its method of monitoring and assessing credit risk. The classes for the Company include commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage, construction, residential mortgage and home equity, and other consumer loans. While the Company's methodology attributes portions of the allowance to specific portfolio segments and classes, the allowance estimate is provided to cover all credit losses expected in the loan portfolio.

The Company's methodology for estimating the allowance balance uses relevant available information, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made to account for differences between current and expected future conditions and those reflected in historical loss information. The allowance is measured on a collective basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis.

38

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations (Continued)

The collectively-assessed allowance methodology incorporated an economic forecast over a 36-month period when ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, was adopted as of January 1, 2020. Beyond the 36-month economic forecast, the allowance methodology reverted to average historical loss information on a straight-line basis over a 24-month period. However, the economic forecast was shortened to a 24-month period during the first quarter of 2020 due to heightened volatility and uncertainty in the economy due to the emergence of COVID-19. No change was made to the 24-month straight-line reversion to historical loss information. These timeframes are regularly reviewed and approved by management and may be adjusted if economic conditions warrant.

An expected loss approach is used to estimate the collectively-assessed allowance for both the commercial and consumer portfolio segments. Expected loss is calculated as the product of PD, LGD, and EAD modeled parameters that are projected on a monthly basis over the assets’ remaining contractual lives. The sum of each month’s expected loss calculation results in the collectively-assessed allowance estimate. Expected loss models use historical loss information and a variety of economic assumptions to estimate PD, LGD, and EAD. These models are tailored to different loan segments, classes and products by changing the economic variables or their weighting in the calculation used to estimate expected losses.

The allowance is an estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining contractual term of each

asset. Expected prepayments are incorporated into the estimation of the EAD for each asset over the asset’s remaining term, which shortens the expected remaining term. Contractual term is not adjusted for expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless we have a reasonable expectation that a TDR will be executed with a borrower. Credit cards do not have defined contractual terms. In order to estimate the expected credit losses on actively used revolving credit card balances, we make assumptions about expected payments and expected spending on the unconditionally cancelable unfunded amount at the measurement date. Expected spending after the measurement date reduces the expected payments that are allocated to the outstanding balance at the measurement date. Expected credit losses are calculated only on the outstanding balances component at the measurement date, which is amortized by applying the proportion of the expected payment allocated to the outstanding balance. Expected payments applied to the expected spending after the measurement date are effectively excluded from the analysis because unconditionally cancelable unfunded commitments are not reservable.

Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated individually to determine the allowance balance. Loans assessed individually include larger nonaccruing loans within the commercial portfolio, TDRs, reasonably expected TDRs and collateral-dependent loans. Collateral-dependent loans are generally individually-assessed for allowance purposes. Collateral-dependent assets' expected credit losses are assessed when the fair value of the collateral is less than the amortized cost basis of the asset. Collateral-dependent assets are evaluated in this manner when foreclosure is probable, or when repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Estimated costs to sell are included in the estimate when repayment is expected by the sale of the collateral. Collateral-dependent assets are generally secured by real estate collateral. When the discounted cash flow method is used to determine the allowance for individually-assessed loans, management does not adjust the interest rate used to discount expected cash flows to incorporate expected prepayments.

Management implements qualitative adjustments to the collectively-assessed allowance to account for the risks not incorporated in the model between current conditions and those reflected in the historical loss information used to estimate the models. These qualitative factors include changes in credit policies, problem loan trends, identification of new risks not incorporated into the modeling framework, credit concentrations, changes in lending management and other external factors. Qualitative adjustments are also used to adjust the collectively-assessed allowance to account for risks attributed to imprecision in the economic forecast and when risks emerge that impact specific portfolio components (i.e., natural disasters).

TDRs are loans where we have granted a concession to a borrower as a result of the borrower experiencing financial difficulty and, consequently, we receive less than the current market-based compensation for loans with similar risk characteristics. Such loans' allowance is measured either individually or in pools with similar risk characteristics. The allowance for a TDR loan is measured using the same method as all other loans when evaluated in pools. The allowance for individually assessed TDR loans can be measured using a discounted cash flow methodology, or by evaluating the fair value of the collateral, if collateral dependent. When the value

39

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations (Continued)

of a concession cannot be measured using a method other than the discounted cash flow method, the value of a concession is measured by discounting the expected future cash flows at the original interest rate of the loan. When we have a reasonable expectation that a TDR loan may be executed with a borrower at the evaluation date, we may modify the allowance calculation to align with the expected modification terms, which may include modifying the expected contractual term.

We generally do not record an allowance for accrued interest receivable on loans held for investment, which is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Uncollectible accrued interest is generally reversed through interest income.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Debt Securities

All securities held to maturity are explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by U.S. government entities or agencies and have a long history of no credit losses. No credit losses are expected on these assets and thus no allowance is estimated on securities held to maturity.

Securities available for sale are composed of assets that are explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by U.S. government entities or agencies and non-agency-backed assets that are highly rated and have not incurred credit losses historically. Unrealized losses on available for sale securities arise from changes in market conditions, not credit losses. Direct purchase bonds are not externally rated but are assessed quarterly to determine whether credit losses exist. Unrealized losses on the direct purchase bonds have arisen from higher current expected returns on capital as compared with required rates of return on capital on the bonds at origination. No credit losses are expected on these assets and thus no allowance is estimated on securities available for sale.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Securities Borrowed or Purchased under Resale Agreements

Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements are also subject to allowance estimation, however management has no history of credit losses on these assets and has portfolio monitoring practices that ensure collateral is maintained at appropriate levels. As borrowers have a history of replenishing collateral securing the financial assets, when needed, and are expected to continue to maintain such behavior in the future, no allowance is estimated on these assets, consistent with the practical expedient methodology described in ASC 326-20-35-6. Management reviews these portfolios on a quarterly basis to confirm the conclusion of no allowance for credit losses remains appropriate.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Unfunded Credit Commitments

The Company maintains an allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments for the contractual term over which we are exposed to credit risk that is not unconditionally cancelable by the Company. The Company's allowance methodology for unfunded credit commitments is the same as that used for the allowance for the other collectively-evaluated assets and includes an estimate of commitments that are expected to fund over the remaining contractual term. The allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments is classified as other liabilities on the balance sheet, with the changes recognized in the provision for credit losses.

40

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations (Continued)

Troubled Debt Restructurings

A TDR is a restructuring of a loan in which the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. A loan subject to such a restructuring is accounted for as a TDR. A TDR typically involves a modification of terms such as a reduction of the interest rate below the current market rate for a loan with similar risk characteristics or extending the maturity date of the loan without corresponding compensation or additional support. The Company measures impairment of a TDR using the methodology described for individually evaluated loans (see "Allowance for Loan Losses" above). For the consumer portfolio segment, TDRs are initially placed on nonaccrual and typically, a minimum of six consecutive months of sustained performance is required before returning to accrual status. For the commercial portfolio segment, the Company generally determines accrual status for TDRs by performing an individual assessment of each loan, which may include, among other factors, demonstrated performance by the borrower under the previous terms.

On March 22, 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued joint guidance advising that the agencies have confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications due to COVID-19 made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current prior to relief, are not TDRs. On March 27, 2020 the CARES Act, which provides relief from TDR classification for certain COVID-19 related loan modifications, was signed into law. At June 30, 2020, $2.7 billion of modified commercial loans and $3.8 billion of modified consumer loans were not classified as TDRs since the modifications, which were largely payment deferrals, met the criteria under either the CARES Act or the criteria specified by the regulatory agencies. For loan modifications that include a payment deferral and are not TDRs, the borrower’s past due and nonaccrual status will not be impacted during the deferral period. Interest income will continue to be recognized over the contractual life of the loan.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which provides new guidance on the accounting for credit losses for instruments that are within its scope. This new guidance is commonly referred to as the CECL model. For loans and debt securities accounted for at amortized cost, certain off-balance sheet credit exposures, net investments in leases, and trade receivables, the ASU requires an entity to recognize its estimate of credit losses expected over the life of the financial instrument or exposure by incorporating forward-looking information, such as reasonable and supportable forecasts, in the entity's assessment of the collectability of financial assets. Lifetime expected credit losses on purchased financial assets with credit deterioration will be recognized as an allowance with an offset to the cost basis of the asset. For available for sale debt securities, the new standard will require recognition of expected credit losses by recognizing an allowance for credit losses when the fair value of the security is below amortized cost and the recognition of this allowance is limited to the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and fair value. The Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2020, and recorded an increase to the allowance for credit losses of $199 million, primarily due to an increase in the allowance for consumer loans, offset by a $52 million deferred tax asset, and a $147 million cumulative-effect adjustment reduction to retained earnings.

Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies disclosure requirements on fair value measurements to improve their effectiveness. The guidance permits entities to consider materiality when evaluating fair value measurement disclosures and, among other modifications, requires certain new disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2020. The guidance only affects disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and will not affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

41

Note 2—Securities

Securities Available for Sale

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are presented below.

	June 30, 2020								December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	3,661	$	242	$	—	$	3,903	$	5,485	$	6	$	53	$	5,438
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	4,366		85		7		4,444		5,491		13		36		5,468
Residential - non-agency	681		9		1		689		759		5		2		762
Commercial - non-agency	3,877		250		13		4,114		3,461		56		28		3,489
Collateralized loan obligations	1,397		—		38		1,359		1,499		—		8		1,491
Direct bank purchase bonds	904		39		11		932		911		43		18		936
Other	187		1		—		188		202		3		—		205
Total securities available for sale	$	15,073	$	626	$	70	$	15,629	$	17,808	$	126	$	145	$	17,789

The Company’s securities available for sale with a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are shown below, identified for periods less than 12 months and 12 months or more.

	June 30, 2020
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	$	114	$	1	$	1,078	$	6	$	1,192	$	7
Residential - non-agency	89		1		17		—		106		1
Commercial - non-agency	281		13		2		—		283		13
Collateralized loan obligations	883		21		476		17		1,359		38
Direct bank purchase bonds	159		2		185		9		344		11
Other	50		—		—		—		50		—
Total securities available for sale	$	1,576	$	38	$	1,758	$	32	$	3,334	$	70

42

Note 2—Securities (Continued)

	December 31, 2019
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	4,407	$	48	$	543	$	5	$	4,950	$	53
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	914		4		2,769		32		3,683		36
Residential - non-agency	127		—		155		2		282		2
Commercial - non-agency	1,669		28		12		—		1,681		28
Collateralized loan obligations	597		2		790		6		1,387		8
Direct bank purchase bonds	118		1		294		17		412		18
Other	25		—		—		—		25		—
Total securities available for sale	$	7,857	$	83	$	4,563	$	62	$	12,420	$	145

At June 30, 2020, the Company did not have the intent to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position before a recovery of the amortized cost, which may be at maturity. The Company also believes that it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the securities prior to recovery of amortized cost.

Agency residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities consist of securities guaranteed by a U.S. government corporation, such as Ginnie Mae, or a government-sponsored agency such as Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. These securities are collateralized by residential and commercial mortgage loans and may be prepaid at par prior to maturity. The unrealized losses on agency residential mortgage-backed securities resulted from changes in interest rates and not from changes in credit quality. At June 30, 2020, the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities because the Company determined that the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Company from losses.

Commercial mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by commercial mortgage loans and are generally subject to prepayment penalties. The unrealized losses on commercial mortgage-backed securities resulted from higher market yields since purchase. Cash flow analysis of the underlying collateral provides an estimate of impairment, which is performed quarterly when the fair value of a security is lower than its amortized cost. Based on the analysis performed as of June 30, 2020, the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

The Company’s CLOs consist of Cash Flow CLOs. A Cash Flow CLO is a structured finance product that securitizes a diversified pool of loan assets into multiple classes of notes. Cash Flow CLOs pay the note holders through the receipt of interest and principal repayments from the underlying loans unlike other types of CLOs that pay note holders through the trading and sale of underlying collateral. Unrealized losses typically arise from widening credit spreads and deteriorating credit quality of the underlying collateral. Cash flow analysis of the underlying collateral provides an estimate of impairment, which is performed quarterly when the fair value of a security is lower than its amortized cost. Based on the analysis performed as of June 30, 2020, the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

Direct bank purchase bonds are not rated by external credit rating agencies. The unrealized losses on these bonds resulted from a higher return on capital expected by the secondary market compared with the return on capital required at the time of origination when the bonds were purchased. The Company estimates the unrealized loss for each security by assessing the underlying collateral of each security. The Company estimates the portion of loss attributable to credit based on the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral using estimates of current key assumptions, such as probability of default and loss severity. Cash flow analysis of the underlying collateral provides an estimate of impairment, which is performed quarterly when the fair value of a security is lower than its amortized cost and potential impairment is identified. Based on the analysis performed as of June 30, 2020, the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

43

Note 2—Securities (Continued)

The fair value of debt securities available for sale by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	One Year or Less		Over One Year Through Five Years		Over Five Years Through Ten Years		Over Ten Years		Total Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	—	$	158	$	3,637	$	108	$	3,903
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	—		76		990		3,378		4,444
Residential - non-agency	—		—		—		689		689
Commercial - non-agency	28		—		1,685		2,401		4,114
Collateralized loan obligations	—		3		412		944		1,359
Direct bank purchase bonds	82		273		482		95		932
Other	10		178		—		—		188
Total securities available for sale	$	120	$	688	$	7,206	$	7,615	$	15,629

The gross realized gains and losses from sales of available for sale securities for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019 are shown below. The specific identification method is used to calculate realized gains and losses on sales.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Gross realized gains	$	57	$	22	$	110	$	23

Securities Held to Maturity

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in OCI, carrying amount, gross unrealized gains and losses not recognized in OCI, and fair value of securities held to maturity are presented below. Management has asserted the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity.

	June 30, 2020
			Recognized in OCI						Not Recognized in OCI
(Dollars in millions)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Carrying Amount		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	1,243	$	—	$	—	$	1,243	$	19	$	—	$	1,262
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	6,949		1		88		6,862		295		—		7,157
Total securities held to maturity	$	8,192	$	1	$	88	$	8,105	$	314	$	—	$	8,419

	December 31, 2019
			Recognized in OCI						Not Recognized in OCI
(Dollars in millions)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Carrying Amount		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	1,359	$	—	$	—	$	1,359	$	—	$	6	$	1,353
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	8,166		—		104		8,062		123		30		8,155
Total securities held to maturity	$	9,525	$	—	$	104	$	9,421	$	123	$	36	$	9,508

44

Note 2—Securities (Continued)

Amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, adjusted for any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less principal payments and any impairment previously recognized in earnings. The carrying amount is the difference between the amortized cost and the amount recognized in OCI. The amount recognized in OCI primarily reflects the unrealized gain or loss at date of transfer from available for sale to the held to maturity classification, net of amortization, which is recorded in interest income on securities.

The Company’s securities held to maturity with a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are shown below, separately for periods less than 12 months and 12 months or more.

	June 30, 2020
	Less Than 12 months						12 Months or More						Total
			Unrealized Losses						Unrealized Losses						Unrealized Losses
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Recognized in OCI		Not Recognized in OCI		Fair Value		Recognized in OCI		Not Recognized in OCI		Fair Value		Recognized in OCI		Not Recognized in OCI
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	$	38	$	—	$	—	$	3,048	$	88	$	—	$	3,086	$	88	$	—
Total securities held to maturity	$	38	$	—	$	—	$	3,048	$	88	$	—	$	3,086	$	88	$	—

	December 31, 2019
	Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total
			Unrealized Losses						Unrealized Losses						Unrealized Losses
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Recognized in OCI		Not Recognized in OCI		Fair Value		Recognized in OCI		Not Recognized in OCI		Fair Value		Recognized in OCI		Not Recognized in OCI
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	509	$	—	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	509	$	—	$	6
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	1,084		—		9		4,515		104		21		5,599		104		30
Total securities held to maturity	$	1,593	$	—	$	15	$	4,515	$	104	$	21	$	6,108	$	104	$	36

The carrying amount and fair value of securities held to maturity by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2020
	Within One Year				Over One Year Through Five Years				Over Five Years Through Ten Years				Over Ten Years				Total
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	2	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	1,241	$	1,260	$	—	$	—	$	1,243	$	1,262
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	—		—		658		688		786		821		5,418		5,648		6,862		7,157
Total securities held to maturity	$	2	$	2	$	658	$	688	$	2,027	$	2,081	$	5,418	$	5,648	$	8,105	$	8,419

Securities Pledged and Received as Collateral

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company pledged $11.7 billion and $10.5 billion of available for sale and trading securities as collateral, respectively, of which $1.7 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, was permitted to be sold or repledged. These securities were pledged as collateral for derivative liability positions, and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and to secure public and trust department deposits.

45

Note 2—Securities (Continued)

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company received $25.7 billion and $34.0 billion, respectively, of collateral for derivative asset positions and securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, of which $25.7 billion and $34.0 billion, respectively, was permitted to be sold or repledged. Of the collateral received, the Company sold or repledged $25.0 billion and $32.5 billion at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, for securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements.

For additional information related to the Company's significant accounting policies on securities pledged as collateral, see Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in our 2019 Form 10-K.

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table provides the outstanding balances of loans held for investment at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Loans held for investment:
Commercial and industrial	$	29,464		$	26,338
Commercial mortgage	16,683			16,895
Construction	1,712			1,511
Lease financing	1,027			1,001
Total commercial portfolio	48,886			45,745
Residential mortgage and home equity(1)	33,794			38,018
Other consumer(2)	3,855			4,450
Total consumer portfolio	37,649			42,468
Total loans held for investment(3)	86,535			88,213
Allowance for loan losses	(1,452		)	(538		)
Loans held for investment, net	$	85,083		$	87,675

(1) Includes home equity loans of $1,874 million and $2,049 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

(2) Other consumer loans substantially include unsecured consumer loans and consumer credit cards.

(3) Includes $199 million and $320 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, for net unamortized (discounts) and premiums and deferred (fees) and costs.

Accrued interest receivable on loans held for investment totaled $241 million at June 30, 2020 and is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. For certain COVID-19 related loan modifications, which were largely payment deferrals, the Company recorded an allowance for uncollectible accrued interest of $5 million at June 30, 2020.

46

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $264 million and $538 million for the commercial loan segment and $89 million and $263 million for the consumer loan segment for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020, respectively, largely due to the impact of COVID-19 and the corresponding deterioration in the economic environment on the allowance for loan losses. The economic forecast incorporated management's expectations at June 30, 2020 which included a sharp increase in the unemployment rate during 2020, with a modest recovery emerging in late 2020 and continuing into subsequent years. At March 31, 2020 management expected lower unemployment and a quicker recovery. Downgrades also contributed to the commercial segment provision. The collectively-assessed allowance for credit losses estimate also incorporated management’s qualitatively-determined model input adjustments and overlays that reflect the anticipated loss mitigating impact of monetary and fiscal stimulus policies and loan modification programs as a result of COVID-19 that are not otherwise incorporated into the collectively-assessed modeling methodology. The following tables provide a reconciliation of changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	679		$	473		$	—	$	1,152
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	264			89			—		353
Loans charged-off	(14		)	(45		)	—		(59		)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off	3			3			—		6
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	932		$	520		$	—	$	1,452

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	389		$	122		$	5		$	516
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	20			51			(5		)	66
Loans charged-off	(14		)	(21		)	—			(35		)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off	12			3			—			15
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	407		$	155		$	—		$	562

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	354		$	184		$	—	$	538
Cumulative effect adjustment from adoption of ASC 326 (1)	76			153			—		229
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period, adjusted for adoption of ASC 326 (1)	430			337			—		767
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	538			263			—		801
Loans charged-off	(46		)	(86		)	—		(132		)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off	10			6			—		16
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	932		$	520		$	—	$	1,452

(1) For further information see Note 1 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	359		$	110		$	5		$	474
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	52			78			(5		)	125
Loans charged-off	(25		)	(38		)	—			(63		)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off	21			5			—			26
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	407		$	155		$	—		$	562

47

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The following table shows the allowance for loan losses and related loan balances by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2019.

	December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	43	$	12	$	—	$	55
Collectively evaluated for impairment	311		172		—		483
Total allowance for loan losses	$	354	$	184	$	—	$	538
Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	436	$	246	$	—	$	682
Collectively evaluated for impairment	45,309		42,222		—		87,531
Total loans held for investment	$	45,745	$	42,468	$	—	$	88,213

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans

The following table presents nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The nonaccrual loans all have related allowance for credit losses accrued as of June 30, 2020.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	222	$	175
Commercial mortgage	147		15
Construction	45		—
Total commercial portfolio	414		190
Residential mortgage and home equity	206		137
Other consumer	1		1
Total consumer portfolio	207		138
Total nonaccrual loans	$	621	$	328
Troubled debt restructured loans that continue to accrue interest	$	317	$	392
Troubled debt restructured nonaccrual loans (included in total nonaccrual loans above)	$	253	$	171

The following tables show the aging of the balance of loans held for investment by class as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

	June 30, 2020
	Aging Analysis of Loans
(Dollars in millions)	Current		30 to 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	30,259	$	155	$	76	$	231	$	30,490
Commercial mortgage	16,487		179		17		196		16,683
Construction	1,706		7		—		7		1,713
Total commercial portfolio	48,452		341		93		434		48,886
Residential mortgage and home equity	33,463		251		80		331		33,794
Other consumer	3,820		19		16		35		3,855
Total consumer portfolio	37,283		270		96		366		37,649
Total loans held for investment	$	85,735	$	611	$	189	$	800	$	86,535

48

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

	December 31, 2019
	Aging Analysis of Loans
(Dollars in millions)	Current		30 to 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	27,241	$	37	$	61	$	98	$	27,339
Commercial mortgage	16,858		34		3		37		16,895
Construction	1,511		—		—		—		1,511
Total commercial portfolio	45,610		71		64		135		45,745
Residential mortgage and home equity	37,788		179		51		230		38,018
Other consumer	4,400		33		17		50		4,450
Total consumer portfolio	42,188		212		68		280		42,468
Total loans held for investment	$	87,798	$	283	$	132	$	415	$	88,213

Loans held for investment 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest totaled $74 million at June 30, 2020 and $20 million at December 31, 2019. The following table presents the loans that are 90 days or more past due, but are not on nonaccrual status by loan class.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	36	$	3
Commercial mortgage	14		—
Total commercial portfolio	50		3
Residential mortgage and home equity	9		—
Other consumer	15		17
Total consumer portfolio	24		17
Total loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing	$	74	$	20

49

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Credit Quality Indicators

Management analyzes the Company's loan portfolios by applying specific monitoring policies and procedures that vary according to the relative risk profile and other characteristics within the various loan portfolios. Loans within the commercial portfolio segment are classified as either pass or criticized. Criticized credits are those that have regulatory risk ratings of special mention, substandard or doubtful; classified credits are those that have regulatory risk ratings of substandard or doubtful. Special mention credits are potentially weak, as the borrower has begun to exhibit deteriorating trends, which, if not corrected, may jeopardize repayment of the loan and result in further downgrade. Substandard credits have well-defined weaknesses, which, if not corrected, could jeopardize the full satisfaction of the debt. A credit classified as doubtful has critical weaknesses that make full collection improbable on the basis of currently existing facts and conditions.

The following tables summarize the loans in the commercial portfolio segment monitored for credit quality based on regulatory risk ratings.

	June 30, 2020
	Non-Revolving Loans at Amortized Cost by Origination Year																		Revolving Loans			Total
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior
Commercial and industrial:
Pass	$	4,124		$	2,389		$	1,886		$	1,275		$	821		$	1,608		$	15,074		$	27,177
Criticized:
Special Mention	24			280			198			71			8			171			656			1,408
Classified	50			36			75			40			1			70			607			879
Total	4,198			2,705			2,159			1,386			830			1,849			16,337			29,464
Commercial mortgage:
Pass	911			3,766			3,101			1,868			1,696			4,036			73			15,451
Criticized:
Special Mention	10			124			349			31			111			163			15			803
Classified	—			7			10			4			5			403			—			429
Total	921			3,897			3,460			1,903			1,812			4,602			88			16,683
Construction:
Pass	124			730			345			255			35			—			14			1,503
Criticized:
Special Mention	—			5			98			3			8			25			8			147
Classified	—			4			45			13			—			—			—			62
Total	124			739			488			271			43			25			22			1,712
Lease financing:
Pass	152			257			1			—			50			464			—			924
Criticized:
Special Mention	—			12			—			—			—			91			—			103
Classified	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Total	152			269			1			—			50			555			—			1,027
Total commercial portfolio	$	5,395		$	7,610		$	6,108		$	3,560		$	2,735		$	7,031		$	16,447		$	48,886
Percentage of total	11		%	16		%	12		%	7		%	6		%	14		%	34		%	100		%

	December 31, 2019
			Criticized
(Dollars in millions)	Pass		Special Mention		Classified		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	26,210	$	636	$	493	$	27,339
Commercial mortgage	16,569		114		212		16,895
Construction	1,399		50		62		1,511
Total commercial portfolio	$	44,178	$	800	$	767	$	45,745

50

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The Company monitors the credit quality of its consumer portfolio segment based primarily on payment status. The following tables summarize the loans in the consumer portfolio segment, which exclude $3 million of loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements at December 31, 2019.

Payment Status	June 30, 2020
	Non-Revolving Loans at Amortized Cost by Origination Year																		Revolving Loans			Total
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior
Residential mortgage and home equity:
Accrual	$	1,629		$	5,369		$	3,791		$	7,170		$	6,477		$	7,972		$	1,180		$	33,588
Nonaccrual	—			3			5			8			8			178			4			206
Total	1,629			5,372			3,796			7,178			6,485			8,150			1,184			33,794
Other consumer:
Accrual	524			2,257			703			54			9			34			273			3,854
Nonaccrual	—			—			—			—			—			1			—			1
Total	524			2,257			703			54			9			35			273			3,855
Total consumer portfolio	$	2,153		$	7,629		$	4,499		$	7,232		$	6,494		$	8,185		$	1,457		$	37,649
Percentage of total	6		%	20		%	12		%	19		%	17		%	22		%	4		%	100		%

	December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Accrual		Nonaccrual		Total
Residential mortgage and home equity	$	37,878	$	137	$	38,015
Other consumer	4,449		1		4,450
Total consumer portfolio	$	42,327	$	138	$	42,465

51

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The Company also monitors the credit quality for substantially all of its consumer portfolio segment using credit scores provided by FICO and refreshed LTV ratios. FICO credit scores are refreshed at least quarterly to monitor the quality of the portfolio. Refreshed LTV measures the principal balance of the loan as a percentage of the estimated current value of the property securing the loan. Home equity loans are evaluated using combined LTV, which measures the principal balance of the combined loans that have liens against the property (including unused credit lines for home equity products) as a percentage of the estimated current value of the property securing the loans. The LTV ratios are refreshed on a quarterly basis, using the most recent home pricing index data available for the property location. 

The following tables summarize the loans in the consumer portfolio segment based on refreshed FICO scores and refreshed LTV ratios at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The December 31, 2019 amounts presented reflect unpaid principal balances less partial charge-offs.

FICO Scores	June 30, 2020
	Non-Revolving Loans by Origination Year																		Revolving Loans			Total
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior
Residential mortgage and home equity:
720 and Above	$	1,407		$	4,628		$	3,157		$	6,037		$	5,613		$	6,352		$	931		$	28,125
Below 720	205			726			626			1,088			831			1,511			240			5,227
No FICO Available(1)	17			18			13			53			41			287			13			442
Total	1,629			5,372			3,796			7,178			6,485			8,150			1,184			33,794
Other consumer loans:
720 and Above	347			1,329			423			33			5			6			118			2,261
Below 720	177			928			280			21			4			4			153			1,567
No FICO Available(1)	—			—			—			—			—			25			2			27
Total	524			2,257			703			54			9			35			273			3,855
Total consumer portfolio	$	2,153		$	7,629		$	4,499		$	7,232		$	6,494		$	8,185		$	1,457		$	37,649
Percentage of total	6		%	20		%	12		%	19		%	17		%	22		%	4		%	100		%

(1) Represents loans for which management was not able to obtain an updated FICO score (e.g., due to recent profile changes).

	December 31, 2019
	FICO scores
(Dollars in millions)	720 and Above			Below 720			No FICO Available(1)			Total
Residential mortgage and home equity	$	31,441		$	5,742		$	454		$	37,637
Other consumer	2,567			1,841			3			4,411
Total consumer portfolio	$	34,008		$	7,583		$	457		$	42,048
Percentage of total	81		%	18		%	1		%	100		%

(1) Represents loans for which management was not able to obtain an updated FICO score (e.g., due to recent profile changes).

52

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

LTV Ratios	June 30, 2020
	Non-Revolving Loans by Origination Year																		Revolving Loans			Total
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016			Prior
Residential mortgage and home equity:
80% or below	$	1,613		$	5,125		$	3,593		$	7,125		$	6,476		$	8,077		$	1,067		$	33,076
80% to 100%	15			247			201			52			8			37			112			672
100% or more	—			—			—			—			—			6			—			6
No LTV Available(1)	1			—			2			1			1			30			5			40
Total	1,629			5,372			3,796			7,178			6,485			8,150			1,184			33,794
Total consumer portfolio	$	1,629		$	5,372		$	3,796		$	7,178		$	6,485		$	8,150		$	1,184		$	33,794
Percentage of total	5		%	16		%	11		%	21		%	19		%	24		%	4		%	100		%

(1) Represents loans for which management was not able to obtain refreshed property values.

	December 31, 2019
	LTV ratios
(Dollars in millions)	Less than or Equal to 80 Percent			Greater than 80 and Less than 100 Percent			Greater than or Equal to 100 Percent			No LTV Available(1)			Total
Residential mortgage and home equity	$	35,893		$	1,689		$	12		$	43		$	37,637
Total consumer portfolio	$	35,893		$	1,689		$	12		$	43		$	37,637
Percentage of total	95		%	5		%	—		%	—		%	100		%

(1) Represents loans for which management was not able to obtain refreshed property values.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s recorded investment in TDRs as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The summary includes those TDRs that are on nonaccrual status and those that continue to accrue interest. The Company had $36 million and $61 million in commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers with loan modifications classified as TDRs as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	147	$	140
Commercial mortgage	170		168
Construction	52		62
Total commercial portfolio	369		370
Residential mortgage and home equity	200		192
Other consumer	1		1
Total consumer portfolio	201		193
Total restructured loans	$	570	$	563

For the second quarter of 2020, TDR modifications in the commercial portfolio segment were largely composed of forbearance and covenant amendment. In the consumer portfolio segment, modifications were largely composed of maturity extensions and interest rate reductions. There were no charge-offs related to TDR modifications for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019. For the commercial and consumer portfolio segments, the allowance for loan losses for TDRs was measured on an individual loan basis or in pools with similar risk characteristics.

53

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

On March 22, 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued joint guidance advising that the agencies have confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications due to COVID-19 made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current prior to relief, are not TDRs. On March 27, 2020 the CARES Act, which provides relief from TDR classification for certain COVID-19 related loan modifications, was signed into law. At June 30, 2020, $2.7 billion of modified commercial loans and $3.8 billion of modified consumer loans were not classified as TDRs since the modifications, which were largely payment deferrals, met the criteria under either the CARES Act or the criteria specified by the regulatory agencies. For loan modifications that include a payment deferral and are not TDRs, the borrower’s past due and nonaccrual status will not be impacted during the deferral period. Interest income will continue to be recognized over the contractual life of the loan.

The following tables provide the pre- and post-modification outstanding recorded investment amounts of TDRs as of the date of the restructuring that occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020				For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(1)		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(2)		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(1)		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(2)
Commercial and industrial	$	98	$	98	$	101	$	101
Commercial mortgage	3		3		3		3
Total commercial portfolio	101		101		104		104
Residential mortgage and home equity	23		23		24		24
Total consumer portfolio	23		23		24		24
Total	$	124	$	124	$	128	$	128

(1) Represents the recorded investment in the loan immediately prior to the restructuring event.

(2) Represents the recorded investment in the loan immediately following the restructuring event. It includes the effect of paydowns that were required as part of the restructuring terms.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019				For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(1)		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(2)		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(1)		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment(2)
Commercial and industrial	$	62	$	62	$	103	$	103
Commercial mortgage	60		59		62		61
Total commercial portfolio	122		121		165		164
Residential mortgage and home equity	1		1		6		6
Total consumer portfolio	1		1		6		6
Total	$	123	$	122	$	171	$	170

(1) Represents the recorded investment in the loan immediately prior to the restructuring event.

(2) Represents the recorded investment in the loan immediately following the restructuring event. It includes the effect of paydowns that were required as part of the restructuring terms.

54

Note 3—Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The following tables provide the recorded investment amounts of TDRs at the date of default, for which there was a payment default during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and where the default occurred within the first twelve months after modification into a TDR. A payment default is defined as the loan being 60 days or more past due.

(Dollars in millions)	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020		For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Commercial and industrial	$	28	$	28
Total commercial portfolio	28		28
Total	$	28	$	28

(Dollars in millions)	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	40	$	40
Commercial mortgage	—		1
Total commercial portfolio	40		41
Total	$	40	$	41

For loans in the consumer portfolio in which allowance for loan losses is measured using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, historical payment defaults and the propensity to redefault are some of the factors considered when determining the allowance for loan losses.

55

Note 4—Variable Interest Entities

In the normal course of business, the Company has certain financial interests in entities which have been determined to be VIEs. Generally, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, trust or other legal structure where the equity investors do not have substantive voting rights, an obligation to absorb the entity’s losses or the right to receive the entity’s returns, or the ability to direct the significant activities of the entity. The following discusses the Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs.

Consolidated VIEs

The following tables present the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

	June 30, 2020
	Consolidated Assets							Consolidated Liabilities
(Dollars in millions)		Loans Held for Investment, Net		Other Assets		Total Assets		Other Liabilities		Total Liabilities
LIHC investments		$	—	$	90	$	90	$	37	$	37
Leasing investments		332		115		447		5		5
Total consolidated VIEs		$	332	$	205	$	537	$	42	$	42

	December 31, 2019
	Consolidated Assets							Consolidated Liabilities
(Dollars in millions)		Loans Held for Investment, Net		Other Assets		Total Assets		Other Liabilities		Total Liabilities
LIHC investments		$	—	$	96	$	96	$	36	$	36
Leasing investments		349		117		466		9		9
Total consolidated VIEs		$	349	$	213	$	562	$	45	$	45

LIHC Investments

The Company sponsors, manages and syndicates two LIHC investment fund structures. These investments are designed to generate a return primarily through the realization of U.S. federal tax credits and deductions. The Company is considered the primary beneficiary and has consolidated these investments because the Company has the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the funds’ economic performances and also has the obligation to absorb losses of the funds that could potentially be significant to the funds. Neither creditors nor equity investors in the LIHC investments have any recourse to the general credit of the Company, and the Company’s creditors do not have any recourse to the assets of the consolidated LIHC investments.

Leasing Investments

The Company has leasing investments primarily in the wind energy, rail and coal industries. The Company is considered the primary beneficiary and has consolidated these investments because the Company has the power to direct the activities of these entities that significantly impact the entities’ economic performances. The Company also has the right to receive potentially significant benefits or the obligation to absorb potentially significant losses of these investments.

56

Note 4—Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

Unconsolidated VIEs

The following tables present the Company’s carrying amounts related to the unconsolidated VIEs at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The tables also present the Company’s maximum exposure to loss resulting from its involvement with these VIEs. The maximum exposure to loss represents the carrying amount of the Company’s involvement plus any legally binding unfunded commitments in the unlikely event that all of the assets in the VIEs become worthless. During the six months endedJune 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the Company had noncash increases in unfunded commitments on LIHC investments of $52 million and $94 million, respectively, included within other liabilities.

	June 30, 2020
	Unconsolidated Assets								Unconsolidated Liabilities
(Dollars in millions)	Securities Available for Sale		Loans Held for Investment, Net		Other Assets		Total Assets		Other Liabilities		Total Liabilities		Maximum Exposure to Loss
LIHC investments	$	27	$	236	$	868	$	1,131	$	187	$	187	$	1,130
Renewable energy investments	—		—		1,290		1,290		—		—		1,310
Other investments	—		6		73		79		4		4		166
Total unconsolidated VIEs	$	27	$	242	$	2,231	$	2,500	$	191	$	191	$	2,606

	December 31, 2019
	Unconsolidated Assets									Unconsolidated Liabilities
(Dollars in millions)		Securities Available for Sale		Loans Held for Investment, Net		Other Assets		Total Assets		Other Liabilities		Total Liabilities		Maximum Exposure to Loss
LIHC investments		$	27	$	219	$	872	$	1,118	$	148	$	148	$	1,118
Renewable energy investments		—		—		1,256		1,256		—		—		1,276
Other investments		—		13		69		82		4		4		163
Total unconsolidated VIEs		$	27	$	232	$	2,197	$	2,456	$	152	$	152	$	2,557

LIHC Investments

The Company makes investments in partnerships and funds formed by third parties. The primary purpose of the partnerships and funds is to invest in low-income housing units and distribute tax credits and tax benefits associated with the underlying properties to investors. The Company is a limited partner investor and is allocated tax credits and deductions, but has no voting or other rights to direct the activities of the funds or partnerships, and therefore is not considered the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate these investments.

The following table presents the impact of the unconsolidated LIHC investments on our consolidated statements of income for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019.

	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019		June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)
Losses from LIHC investments included in other noninterest expense	$	1	$	1	$	2	$	3
Amortization of LIHC investments included in income tax expense	28		30		59		64
Tax credits and other tax benefits from LIHC investments included in income tax expense	43		41		79		86

57

Note 4—Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

Renewable Energy Investments

Through its subsidiaries, the Company makes equity investments in LLCs established by third party sponsors to operate and manage wind, solar, hydroelectric and cogeneration power plant projects. Power generated by the projects is sold to third parties through long-term purchase power agreements. As a limited investor member, the Company is allocated production tax credits and taxable income or losses associated with the projects. The Company has no voting or other rights to direct the significant activities of the LLCs, and therefore is not considered the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate these investments.

Other Investments

The Company has other investments in structures formed by third parties. The Company has no voting or other rights to direct the activities of the investments that would most significantly impact the entities’ performance, and therefore is not considered the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate these investments.

Note 5—Securities Financing Arrangements

The Company enters into repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements to facilitate customer match-book activity, cover short positions and fund the Company's trading inventory. The Company manages credit exposure from certain transactions by entering into master netting agreements and collateral arrangements with counterparties. The relevant agreements allow for the efficient closeout of the transaction, liquidation and set-off of collateral against the net amount owed by the counterparty following a default. Under these agreements and transactions, the Company either receives or provides collateral in the form of securities. In many cases, the Company is permitted to sell or repledge these securities held as collateral and use the securities to secure repurchase agreements or enter into securities lending transactions. In certain cases, the Company may agree for collateral to be posted to a third party custodian under a tri-party arrangement that enables the Company to take control of such collateral in the event of a counterparty default. Default events generally include, among other things, failure to pay, insolvency or bankruptcy of a counterparty. For additional information related to securities pledged and received as collateral, refer to Note 2 "Securities" to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table presents the gross obligations for securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned by remaining contractual maturity and class of collateral pledged as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

	June 30, 2020										December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		31 - 90 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total		Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 Days		31 - 90 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	9,424	$	2,392	$	—	$	100	$	11,916	$	12,219	$	2,237	$	385	$	102	$	14,943
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	7,035		1,879		3,100		1,050		13,064		5,322		1,582		7,126		—		14,030
Corporate debt	485		—		790		—		1,275		688		24		1,161		—		1,873
Other debt	317		—		500		—		817		327		—		533		—		860
Equity	300		—		436		—		736		1,400		349		456		—		2,205
Total	$	17,561	$	4,271	$	4,826	$	1,150	$	27,808	$	19,956	$	4,192	$	9,661	$	102	$	33,911
Securities loaned:
Corporate bonds	147		—		—		—		147		2		—		—		—		2
Other Debt	61		—		—		—		61		—		—		—		—		—
Equity	262		29		—		—		291		257		236		—		—		493
Total	$	470	$	29	$	—	$	—	$	499	$	259	$	236	$	—	$	—	$	495

58

Note 5—Securities Financing Arrangements (Continued)

Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company primarily enters into derivative contracts, repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements with counterparties utilizing standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements and Credit Support Annex Agreements, Master Repurchase Agreements, and Master Securities Lending Agreements, respectively. These agreements generally establish the terms and conditions of the transactions, including a legal right to set-off amounts payable and receivable between the Company and a counterparty, regardless of whether or not such amounts have matured or have contingency features.

The following tables present the offsetting of financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

	June 30, 2020
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
(Dollars in millions)	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received/Pledged		Net Amount
Financial Assets:
Derivative assets	$	2,690	$	611	$	2,079	$	59	$	—	$	2,020
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	23,300		6,219		17,081		16,987		—		94
Total	$	25,990	$	6,830	$	19,160	$	17,046	$	—	$	2,114
Financial Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	981	$	634	$	347	$	193	$	1	$	153
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	28,307		6,220		22,087		21,396		—		691
Total	$	29,288	$	6,854	$	22,434	$	21,589	$	1	$	844

	December 31, 2019
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
(Dollars in millions)	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received/Pledged		Net Amount
Financial Assets:
Derivative assets	$	1,233	$	264	$	969	$	26	$	—	$	943
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	29,483		5,540		23,943		23,844		—		99
Total	$	30,716	$	5,804	$	24,912	$	23,870	$	—	$	1,042
Financial Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	523	$	306	$	217	$	129	$	1	$	87
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	34,406		5,540		28,866		27,957		—		909
Total	$	34,929	$	5,846	$	29,083	$	28,086	$	1	$	996

59

Note 6—Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Borrowings

The following table is a summary of the Company's commercial paper and other short-term borrowings.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Debt issued by MUB
Commercial paper, with a weighted average interest rate of 1.41% and 1.98% at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively	$	333	$	58
Federal Home Loan Bank advances, with a weighted average interest rate of 0.36% and 1.86% at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively	2,100		6,100
Total debt issued by MUB	2,433		6,158
Debt issued by other MUAH subsidiaries
Short-term debt due to MUFG Bank, Ltd., with weighted average interest rates of 0.69% and 2.27% at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively	9		69
Short-term debt due to affiliates, with weighted average interest rates of (-0.07)% and (-0.10)% at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively	260		257
Total debt issued by other MUAH subsidiaries	269		326
Total commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	$	2,702	$	6,484

Short-term debt due to MUFG Bank, Ltd. consists of both secured and unsecured fixed and floating rate borrowings.

MUSA maintains an uncommitted, unsecured lending facility with Mitsubishi UFJ Securities Holdings Co., Ltd. under which it may borrow up to JPY 160 billion (USD 1.5 billion equivalent). Under the terms of the facility, MUSA can choose to borrow in Japanese Yen or US Dollars. Japanese Yen denominated borrowings include an irrevocable extension option allowing MUSA to extend the maturity of an individual draw by 100 days at any time prior to its original, stated maturity. At June 30, 2020, MUSA had JPY 28 billion (260 million USD equivalent) drawn under this facility.

60

Note 7—Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of borrowings having an original maturity of one year or more. The following is a summary of the Company's long-term debt.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Debt issued by MUAH
Senior debt:
Fixed rate 3.50% notes due June 2022	$	399	$	399
Fixed rate 3.00% notes due February 2025	398		397
Senior debt due to MUFG Bank, Ltd:
Floating rate debt due December 2022. This note, which bears interest at 0.90% above 3-month LIBOR, had a rate of 1.21% at June 30, 2020 and 3.03% at December 31, 2019	3,250		3,250
Floating rate debt due December 2022. This note, which bears interest at 0.97% above 3-month LIBOR, had a rate of 1.28% at June 30, 2020 and 3.07% at December 31, 2019	125		125
Floating rate debt due December 2023. This note, which bears interest at 0.99% above 3-month LIBOR, had a rate of 1.30% at June 30, 2020 and 3.12% at December 31, 2019	1,625		1,625
Floating rate debt due December 2023. This note, which bears interest at 0.94% above 3-month LIBOR, had a rate of 1.25% at June 30, 2020 and 2.82% at December 31, 2019	1,765		1,765
Floating rate debt due December 2023. This note, which bears interest at 0.76% above 3-month EURIBOR, had a rate of 0.76% at June 30, 2020 and 0.76% at December 31, 2019	24		24
Junior subordinated debt payable to trusts:
Floating rate note due September 2036. This note had an interest rate of 2.01% at June 30, 2020 and 3.59% at December 31, 2019	37		37
Total debt issued by MUAH	7,623		7,622
Debt issued by MUB
Senior debt:
Fixed rate 2.10% notes due December 2022	699		698
Floating rate debt due December 2022. These notes which bear interest at 0.71% above the Secured Overnight Financing Rate had a rate of 0.81% at June 30, 2020 and 2.26% at December 31, 2019	299		300
Floating rate debt due March 2022. This note, which bears interest at 0.60% above 3-month LIBOR, had a rate of 0.92% at June 30, 2020 and 2.49% at December 31, 2019	300		300
Variable rate FHLB of San Francisco advances due November 2020. These notes bear a combined weighted average rate of 0.34% at June 30, 2020 and 1.90% at December 31, 2019	1,100		1,100
Fixed rate 3.15% notes due April 2022	998		998
Fixed rate FHLB of San Francisco advances due April 2025. These notes bear a combined weighted average rate of 2.80% at June 30, 2020 and 2.95% at December 31, 2019	5,200		5,500
Other	13		13
Total debt issued by MUB	8,609		8,909
Debt issued by other MUAH subsidiaries
Senior debt due to MUFG Bank, Ltd:
Various floating rate borrowings due between December 2020 and May 2021. These notes, which bear interest above 3-month LIBOR had a weighted average interest rate of 0.31% at June 30, 2020 and 1.94% at December 31, 2019	250		250
Various fixed rate borrowings due between September 2020 and June 2023 with a weighted average interest rate of 2.29% (between 1.71% and 2.44%) at June 30, 2020 and 2.22% (between 1.68% and 2.44%) at December 31, 2019	104		137
Non-recourse debt due to MUFG Bank, Ltd:
Various floating rate non-recourse borrowings due December 2021. These notes, which bear interest above 1- or 3-month LIBOR had a weighted average interest rate of 0.66% at June 30, 2020 and 2.17% at December 31, 2019	3		3
Fixed rate non-recourse borrowings due between October 2020 and July 2023 which had an interest rate of 3.02% (between 1.96% and 3.72%) at June 30, 2020 and 3.07% (between 1.96% and 3.72%) at December 31, 2019	143		166
Other non-recourse debt:
Various floating rate non-recourse borrowings due December 2023. These notes, which bear interest above 1- or 3-month LIBOR had a weighted average interest rate of 2.29% at June 30, 2020 and 3.93% at December 31, 2019	25		13
Fixed rate non-recourse borrowings due December 2026 which had an interest rate of 5.34% at June 30, 2020 and 5.34% December 31, 2019	28		29
Total debt issued by other MUAH subsidiaries	553		598
Total long-term debt	$	16,785	$	17,129

61

Note 7—Long-Term Debt (Continued)

A summary of maturities for the Company's long-term debt at June 30, 2020 is presented below.

(Dollars in millions)	Debt issued by MUAH		Debt issued by MUB		Debt issued by other MUAH subsidiaries		Total
2020	$	—	$	1,725	$	176	$	1,901
2021	—		1,925		188		2,113
2022	3,774		2,795		38		6,607
2023	3,414		1,550		123		5,087
2024	—		—		—		—
Thereafter	435		614		28		1,077
Total long-term debt	$	7,623	$	8,609	$	553	$	16,785

Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Valuation Methodologies

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The Company has an established and documented process for determining fair value for financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. When available, quoted market prices are used to determine fair value. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced parameters, such as yield curves, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, commodity prices and implied volatilities. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure the financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments include amounts that reflect counterparty credit quality and that consider the Company's own creditworthiness in determining the fair value of its trading assets and liabilities. For additional information related to the valuation methodologies used for certain financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value, and information about the Company's valuation processes, see Note 11 "Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In determining fair value, the Company maximizes the use of observable market inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market-derived or market-based information obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s estimate about market data. Based on the observability of the significant inputs used, the Company classifies its fair value measurements in accordance with the three-level hierarchy as defined by GAAP. This hierarchy is based on the quality, observability and reliability of the information used to determine fair value. For additional information related to the fair value hierarchy, see Note 11 "Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in our 2019 Form 10-K.

62

Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, by major category and by valuation hierarchy level.

	June 30, 2020															December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Netting(1)			Fair Value			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Netting(1)			Fair Value
Assets
Trading account assets:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	—		$	3,424		$	—		$	—		$	3,424		$	—		$	2,393		$	—		$	—		$	2,393
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	—			5,810			—			—			5,810			—			5,376			—			—			5,376
Corporate debt	—			656			—			—			656			—			1,212			—			—			1,212
Other debt	—			393			—			—			393			—			306			—			—			306
Equity	106			—			—			—			106			127			—			—			—			127
Derivative contracts	4			2,668			2			(610		)	2,064			16			1,195			8			(256		)	963
Total trading account assets	110			12,951			2			(610		)	12,453			143			10,482			8			(256		)	10,377
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	—			3,903			—			—			3,903			—			5,438			—			—			5,438
Mortgage-backed:
U.S. agencies	—			4,444			—			—			4,444			—			5,468			—			—			5,468
Residential - non-agency	—			689			—			—			689			—			762			—			—			762
Commercial - non-agency	—			4,097			17			—			4,114			—			3,471			18			—			3,489
Collateralized loan obligations	—			1,359			—			—			1,359			—			1,491			—			—			1,491
Direct bank purchase bonds	—			—			932			—			932			—			—			936			—			936
Other	—			12			176			—			188			—			28			177			—			205
Total securities available for sale	—			14,504			1,125			—			15,629			—			16,658			1,131			—			17,789
Other assets:
Mortgage servicing rights	—			—			142			—			142			—			—			270			—			270
Loans held for sale	—			—			44			—			44			—			—			42			—			42
Derivative contracts	—			2			14			(1		)	15			—			10			4			(8		)	6
Equity securities	10			—			—			—			10			10			—			—			—			10
Total other assets	10			2			200			(1		)	211			10			10			316			(8		)	328
Total assets	$	120		$	27,457		$	1,327		$	(611	)	$	28,293		$	153		$	27,150		$	1,455		$	(264	)	$	28,494
Percentage of total	—		%	97		%	5		%	(2		)%	100		%	1		%	95		%	5		%	(1		)%	100		%
Percentage of total Company assets	—		%	16		%	1		%	—		%	17		%	—		%	16		%	1		%	—		%	17		%
Liabilities
Trading account liabilities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	—		$	2,290		$	—		$	—		$	2,290		$	—		$	2,299		$	—		$	—		$	2,299
Corporate debt	—			463			—			—			463			—			646			—			—			646
Other debt	—			57			—			—			57			—			4			—			—			4
Equity	104			—			—			—			104			105			—			—			—			105
Derivatives contracts	11			962			2			(633		)	342			11			499			8			(306		)	212
Total trading account liabilities	115			3,772			2			(633		)	3,256			116			3,448			8			(306		)	3,266
Other liabilities:
FDIC clawback liability	—			—			108			—			108			—			—			121			—			121
Derivatives contracts	—			5			—			(1		)	4			—			2			3			—			5
Total other liabilities	—			5			108			(1		)	112			—			2			124			—			126
Total liabilities	$	115		$	3,777		$	110		$	(634	)	$	3,368		$	116		$	3,450		$	132		$	(306	)	$	3,392
Percentage of total	4		%	112		%	3		%	(19		)%	100		%	3		%	102		%	4		%	(9		)%	100		%
Percentage of total Company liabilities	—		%	3		%	—		%	(1		)%	2		%	—		%	2		%	—		%	—		%	2		%

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements between the same counterparties that allow the Company to net settle all contracts.

63

Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

The following table presents a reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Level 3 securities available for sale at June 30, 2020 and 2019 primarily consist of direct bank purchase bonds.

	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2020															June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Trading Account Assets			Securities Available for Sale			Other Assets			Trading Account Liabilities			Other Liabilities			Trading Account Assets		Securities Available for Sale			Other Assets			Trading Account Liabilities			Other Liabilities
Asset (liability) balance, beginning of period	$	3		$	1,123		$	221		$	(3	)	$	(124	)	$	12	$	1,268		$	386		$	(12	)	$	(119	)
Total gains (losses) - realized/unrealized:
Included in income before taxes	—			—			(24		)	—			2			—		—			(45		)	—			(6		)
Included in other comprehensive income	—			4			—			—			—			—		9			—			—			—
Purchases/additions	—			29			3			—			—			—		2			178			—			—
Sales	—			—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—
Settlements	(1		)	(31		)	—			1			14			—		(191		)	—			—			—
Transfers in (out) of level 3	—			—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—
Asset (liability) balance, end of period	$	2		$	1,125		$	200		$	(2	)	$	(108	)	$	12	$	1,088		$	519		$	(12	)	$	(125	)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in income before taxes for assets and liabilities still held at end of period	$	—		$	—		$	(24	)	$	—		$	1		$	—	$	—		$	(45	)	$	—		$	(6	)

64

Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2020															June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Trading Account Assets			Securities Available for Sale			Other Assets			Trading Account Liabilities			Other Liabilities			Trading Account Assets			Securities Available for Sale			Other Assets			Trading Account Liabilities			Other Liabilities
Asset (liability) balance, beginning of period	$	8		$	1,131		$	316		$	(8	)	$	(124	)	$	13		$	1,331		$	277		$	(13	)	$	(118	)
Total gains (losses) - realized/unrealized):
Included in income before taxes	(3		)	—			(124		)	3			2			2			—			(76		)	(2		)	(7		)
Included in other comprehensive income	—			1			—			—			—			—			20			—			—			—
Purchases/additions	—			30			8			—			—			—			4			318			—			—
Settlements	(3		)	(37		)	—			3			14			(3		)	(267		)	—			3			—
Asset (liability) balance, end of period	$	2		$	1,125		$	200		$	(2	)	$	(108	)	$	12		$	1,088		$	519		$	(12	)	$	(125	)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in income before taxes for assets and liabilities still held at end of period	$	(3	)	$	—		$	(124	)	$	3		$	1		$	2		$	—		$	(76	)	$	(2	)	$	(7	)

The following table presents information about significant unobservable inputs related to the Company’s significant Level 3 assets and liabilities at June 30, 2020.

	June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	Level 3 Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Input(s)	Range of Inputs		Weighted Average
Securities available for sale:
Direct bank purchase bonds	$	932	Return on equity	Market-required return on capital	8.0-10.0	%	9.7	%
				Probability of default	0.0-25.0		0.5
				Loss severity	10.0-65.0		22.4

The direct bank purchase bonds generally use a return on equity valuation technique. This technique uses significant unobservable inputs such as market-required return on capital, probability of default and loss severity. Increases (decreases) in any of these inputs in isolation would result in a lower (higher) fair value measurement.

65

Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

Fair Value Measurement on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets may be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are subject to fair value adjustments that result from the application of the lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 that were still held on the consolidated balance sheet as of the respective periods ended, the following tables present the fair value of such assets by the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each fair value adjustment.

	June 30, 2020								For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020			For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains (Losses)			Gains (Losses)
Loans held for investment	$	194	$	—	$	—	$	194	$	(58	)	$	(67	)
Other assets	98		—		—		98		(9		)	(52		)
Total	$	292	$	—	$	—	$	292	$	(67	)	$	(119	)

	June 30, 2019								For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains (Losses)			Gains (Losses)
Loans held for investment	$	210	$	—	$	—	$	210	$	12		$	(3	)
Other assets	114		—		—		114		(10		)	(15		)
Total	$	324	$	—	$	—	$	324	$	2		$	(18	)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments Disclosures

The tables below present the carrying amount and estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, all of which are accounted for at amortized cost, classified by valuation hierarchy level at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

	June 30, 2020
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,421	$	17,421	$	17,421	$	—	$	—
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	17,081		17,085		—		17,085		—
Securities held to maturity	8,105		8,419		—		8,419		—
Loans held for investment(1)	84,080		85,692		—		—		85,692
Other assets	33		33		33		—		—
Liabilities
Time deposits	$	10,024	10,094		—		10,094		—
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	22,087		22,088		—		22,088		—
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	2,702		2,702		—		2,702		—
Long-term debt	16,785		17,175		—		17,175		—
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
Commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit	81		297		—		—		297

(1) Excludes lease financing. The carrying amount is net of the allowance for loan losses.

66

Note 8—Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

	December 31, 2019
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,641	$	9,641	$	9,641	$	—	$	—
Securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements	23,943		23,946		—		23,946		—
Securities held to maturity	9,421		9,508		—		9,508		—
Loans held for investment(1)	86,687		87,506		—		—		87,506
Other assets	54		54		54		—		—
Liabilities
Time deposits	$	15,651	$	15,691	$	—	$	15,691	$	—
Securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements	28,866		28,866		—		28,866		—
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings	6,484		6,484		—		6,484		—
Long-term debt	17,129		17,344		—		17,344		—
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
Commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit	$	87	$	280	$	—	$	—	$	280

(1) Excludes lease financing. The carrying amount is net of the allowance for loan losses.

Note 9—Derivative Instruments and Other Financial Instruments Used For Hedging

The Company enters into certain derivative and other financial instruments primarily to assist customers with their risk management objectives and to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk. When entering into derivatives on behalf of customers, the Company generally acts as a financial intermediary by offsetting a significant portion of the market risk for these derivatives with third parties. The Company may also enter into derivatives for other risk management purposes. All derivative instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value.

Counterparty credit risk is inherent in derivative instruments. In order to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk, the Company utilizes credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures and master netting and credit support annex agreements. Additionally, the Company considers counterparty credit quality and the creditworthiness of the Company in estimating the fair value of derivative instruments.

67

Note 9—Derivative Instruments and Other Financial Instruments Used For Hedging (Continued)

The table below presents the notional amounts and fair value amounts of the Company's derivative instruments reported on the consolidated balance sheets, segregated between derivative instruments designated and qualifying as hedging instruments and derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Asset and liability values are presented gross, excluding the impact of legally enforceable master netting and credit support annex agreements. The fair value of asset and liability derivatives designated and qualifying as hedging instruments and derivatives designated as other risk management are included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively. The fair value of asset and liability trading derivatives are included in trading account assets and trading account liabilities, respectively.

	June 30, 2020						December 31, 2019
			Fair Value						Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)	Notional Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Notional Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives
Derivative instruments
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts	$	9,509	$	—	$	1	$	13,319	$	—	$	—
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Trading:
Interest rate contracts	192,576		2,272		805		214,805		981		446
Commodity contracts	4		—		—		9		—		—
Foreign exchange contracts	14,886		399		167		11,219		230		64
Equity contracts	84		3		2		72		8		8
Other contracts	78		—		1		72		—		—
Total trading	207,628		2,674		975		226,177		1,219		518
Other risk management	2,183		16		5		1,948		14		5
Total derivative instruments	$	219,320	$	2,690	$	981	$	241,444	$	1,233	$	523

We recognized net gains of $5 million and $28 million on other risk management derivatives for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and net gains of $16 million and $7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, which are included in other noninterest income.

Derivatives Designated and Qualifying as Hedging Instruments

The Company uses interest rate derivatives to manage the financial impact on the Company from changes in market interest rates. These instruments are used to manage interest rate risk relating to specified groups of assets and liabilities, primarily LIBOR-based commercial loans and debt issuances. Derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are designated as either fair value or cash flow hedges.

Cash Flow Hedges

From time to time, the Company uses interest rate derivatives to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows attributable to changes in the designated interest rate on LIBOR indexed loans, and to a lesser extent, to hedge interest rate risk on rollover debt.

The Company used interest rate derivatives with an aggregate notional amount of $9.5 billion at June 30, 2020 to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows attributable to changes in the designated interest rates from variable rate loans. The Company used interest rate derivatives with an aggregate notional amount of $9 million at June 30, 2020 to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows attributable to changes in the designated interest rate on LIBOR indexed short-term borrowings. At June 30, 2020, the weighted average remaining life of the active cash flow hedges was 3.2 years.

For cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged cash flows are recognized in net interest income. At June 30, 2020, the Company expects to reclassify approximately $93 million of income from AOCI to net interest income during the twelve months ending June 30, 2021. This amount could differ from amounts actually realized due to changes in interest rates, hedge terminations and the addition of other hedges subsequent to June 30, 2020.

68

Note 9—Derivative Instruments and Other Financial Instruments Used For Hedging (Continued)

The following table presents the amount and location of the net gains and losses recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income and changes in stockholders' equity for derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

	Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI					Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,					For the Three Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020		2019		Location	2020		2019
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
					Interest income	$	8	$	(21	)
Interest rate contracts	$	52	$	55	Interest expense	—		—
Total	$	52	$	55		$	8	$	(21	)

	Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI					Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,					For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020		2019		Location	2020			2019
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
					Interest income	$	(11	)	$	(40	)
Interest rate contracts	$	475	$	69	Interest expense	—			—
Total	$	475	$	69		$	(11	)	$	(40	)

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Trading Derivatives

Derivative instruments classified as trading include derivatives entered into at MUAH's broker-dealer subsidiary, MUSA, and derivatives entered into as an accommodation for customers and for certain economic hedging activities at MUB. Trading derivatives are included in trading assets or trading liabilities with changes in fair value reflected in income from trading account activities.

The following table presents the amount of the net gains and losses for derivative instruments classified as trading reported in the consolidated statements of income under the heading trading account activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

	Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Trading Derivatives						Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income on Trading Derivatives
	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019			June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019
Trading derivatives
Interest rate contracts	$	(24	)	$	(49	)	$	(83	)	$	(84	)
Equity contracts	(1		)	3			3			7
Foreign exchange contracts	14			13			32			24
Total	$	(11	)	$	(33	)	$	(48	)	$	(53	)

Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company primarily enters into derivative contracts with counterparties utilizing standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements and Credit Support Annex Agreements. These agreements generally establish the terms and conditions of the transactions, including a legal right to set-off amounts payable and receivable between the Company and a counterparty, regardless of whether or not such amounts have matured or have contingency features. For additional information related to offsetting of financial assets and liabilities, refer to Note 5 "Securities Financing Arrangements" to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

69

Note 10—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following tables present the change in each of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income and the related tax effect of the change allocated to each component for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2020 and 2019.

(Dollars in millions)	Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Cash flow hedge activities:
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedges arising during the period	$	54		$	(14	)	$	40
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on hedges included in interest income for loans and interest expense on long-term debt	(8		)	2			(6		)
Net change	46			(12		)	34
Securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on securities available for sale	290			(76		)	214
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on securities available for sale included in securities gains, net	(57		)	15			(42		)
Amortization of net unrealized (gains) losses on held to maturity securities	9			(2		)	7
Net change	242			(63		)	179
Pension and other benefits:
Amortization of prior service credit(1)	(7		)	2			(5		)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss(1)	28			(8		)	20
Net change	21			(6		)	15
Net change in AOCI	$	309		$	(81	)	$	228

(1) These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. For further information, see Note 11 "Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits" to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

(Dollars in millions)	Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
Cash flow hedge activities:
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedges arising during the period	$	55		$	(14	)	$	41
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on hedges included in interest income for loans and interest expense on long-term debt	21			(6		)	15
Net change	76			(20		)	56
Securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on securities available for sale	214			(57		)	157
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on securities available for sale included in securities gains, net	(22		)	6			(16		)
Amortization of net unrealized (gains) losses on held to maturity securities	6			(1		)	5
Net change	198			(52		)	146
Pension and other benefits:
Amortization of prior service credit(1)	(10		)	2			(8		)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss(1)	19			(5		)	14
Net change	9			(3		)	6
Other	(1		)	1			—
Net change in AOCI	$	282		$	(74	)	$	208

(1) These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. For further information, see Note 11 "Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits" to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

70

Note 10—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Continued)

(Dollars in millions)	Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Cash flow hedge activities:
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedges arising during the period	$	477		$	(125	)	$	352
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on hedges included in interest income for loans and interest expense on long-term debt	11			(3		)	8
Net change	488			(128		)	360
Securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on securities available for sale	686			(180		)	506
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on securities available for sale included in securities gains, net	(110		)	29			(81		)
Amortization of net unrealized (gains) losses on held to maturity securities	16			(4		)	12
Net change	592			(155		)	437
Pension and other benefits:
Amortization of prior service credit(1)	(14		)	4			(10		)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss(1)	56			(15		)	41
Net change	42			(11		)	31
Net change in AOCI	$	1,122		$	(294	)	$	828

(1) These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. For further information, see Note 11 "Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits" to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

(Dollars in millions)	Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Cash flow hedge activities:
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedges arising during the period	$	69		$	(18	)	$	51
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on hedges included in interest income for loans and interest expense on long-term debt	40			(11		)	29
Net change	109			(29		)	80
Securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period on securities available for sale	414			(109		)	305
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on securities available for sale included in securities gains, net	(23		)	6			(17		)
Amortization of net unrealized (gains) losses on held to maturity securities	13			(3		)	10
Net change	404			(106		)	298
Pension and other benefits:
Amortization of prior service credit (1)	(20		)	5			(15		)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss(1)	37			(10		)	27
Net change	17			(5		)	12
Other	1			—			1
Net change in AOCI	$	531		$	(140	)	$	391

(1) These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. For additional information, see Note 11 "Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits" to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

71

Note 10—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Continued)

The following tables present the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss balances.

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2020:
	Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment		Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Adjustment			Other		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Dollars in millions)
Balance, March 31, 2019	$	(196	)	$	(221	)	$	—	$	(724	)	$	—	$	(1,141	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	41			157			—		—			—		198
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	15			(11		)	—		6			—		10
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	(140	)	$	(75	)	$	—	$	(718	)	$	—	$	(933	)
Balance, March 31, 2020	$	211		$	165		$	—	$	(638	)	$	—	$	(262	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	40			214			—		—			—		254
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	(6		)	(35		)	—		15			—		(26		)
Balance, June 30, 2020	$	245		$	344		$	—	$	(623	)	$	—	$	(34	)

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2020:
	Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment		Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Adjustment			Other			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Dollars in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2018	$	(220	)	$	(373	)	$	—	$	(730	)	$	(1	)	$	(1,324	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	51			305			—		—			1			357
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	29			(7		)	—		12			—			34
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	(140	)	$	(75	)	$	—	$	(718	)	$	—		$	(933	)
Balance, December 31, 2019	$	(115	)	$	(93	)	$	—	$	(654	)	$	—		$	(862	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	352			506			—		—			—			858
Amounts reclassified from AOCI	8			(69		)	—		31			—			(30		)
Balance, June 30, 2020	$	245		$	344		$	—	$	(623	)	$	—		$	(34	)

72

Note 11—Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The following tables summarize the components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. The components of net periodic benefit cost other than the service cost component are included in other noninterest expense in the income statement.

	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits						Superannuation, SERP and ESBP
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2020		2019
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	22		$	19		$	1		$	—		$	—	$	—
Interest cost	24			30			1			3			—		1
Expected return on plan assets	(66		)	(65		)	(5		)	(5		)	—		—
Amortization of prior service credit	(7		)	(7		)	—			(3		)	—		—
Recognized net actuarial loss	26			16			—			3			1		—
Total net periodic benefit (income) cost	$	(1	)	$	(7	)	$	(3	)	$	(2	)	$	1	$	1

	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits						Superannuation, SERP and ESBP
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2020			2019			2020		2019
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	43		$	38		$	1		$	1		$	—	$	—
Interest cost	48			59			3			5			1		2
Expected return on plan assets	(133		)	(129		)	(10		)	(9		)	—		—
Amortization of prior service credit	(14		)	(13		)	—			(7		)	—		—
Recognized net actuarial loss	54			31			—			5			2		1
Total net periodic benefit (income) cost	$	(2	)	$	(14	)	$	(6	)	$	(5	)	$	3	$	3

73

Note 12—Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

The following table summarizes the Company's commitments.

(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2020
Commitments to extend credit	$	38,281
Issued standby and commercial letters of credit	4,047
Commitments to enter into forward-starting resale agreements	853
Other commitments	577

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to a customer provided there are no violations of any condition established in the contract. Commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require maintenance of compensatory balances. Since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.

Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit are generally contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate foreign or domestic trade transactions. The majority of these types of commitments have remaining terms of 1 year or less. At June 30, 2020, the carrying amount of the Company's standby and commercial letters of credit totaled $3 million. Estimated exposure to loss related to these commitments is covered by the allowance for losses on unfunded commitments. The carrying amounts of the standby and commercial letters of credit and the allowance for losses on unfunded credit commitments are included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

The credit risk involved in issuing loan commitments and standby and commercial letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. Collateral may be obtained based on management's credit assessment of the customer.

Other commitments include collateralized financing activities, commitments to fund principal investments, other securities, and residual value guarantees.

Principal investments include direct investments in private and public companies. The Company issues commitments to provide equity and mezzanine capital financing to private and public companies through direct investments. The timing of future cash requirements to fund such commitments is generally dependent on the investment cycle. This cycle, the period over which privately held companies are funded by private equity investors and ultimately sold, merged, or taken public through an initial offering, can vary based on overall market conditions as well as the nature and type of industry in which the companies operate.

The Company occasionally enters into financial guarantee contracts where a premium is received from another financial institution counterparty to guarantee a portion of the credit risk on interest rate swap contracts entered into between the financial institution and its customer. The Company becomes liable to pay the financial institution only if the financial institution is unable to collect amounts owed to them by their customer. As of June 30, 2020, the current exposure to loss under these contracts totaled $65 million, and the maximum potential exposure to loss in the future was estimated at $80 million.

The Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. The Company maintains liabilities for losses from legal actions that are recorded when they are determined to be both probable in their occurrence and can be reasonably estimated. Management believes the disposition of all claims currently pending, including potential losses from claims that may exceed the liabilities recorded, and claims for loss contingencies that are considered reasonably possible to occur, will not have a material effect, either individually or in the aggregate, on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

74

Note 13—Business Segments

The Company has four reportable segments: Regional Bank, Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S., Transaction Banking, and MUSA. The Company uses various management accounting methodologies to measure the performance of its segments. Unlike GAAP, there is no standardized or authoritative guidance for management accounting. Consequently, reported results are not necessarily comparable with those presented by other companies and they are not necessarily indicative of the results that would be reported by the business units if they were separate economic entities. During the second quarter of 2020, certain customer relationships and associated deposits were transferred from Transaction Banking to Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S. Prior period results have been revised to conform to the current period presentation.

The management reporting accounting methodologies, which are enhanced from time to time, measure segment profitability by assigning balance sheet and statements of income items to each operating segment. Methodologies that are applied to the measurement of segment profitability, which are enhanced from time to time, include a funds transfer pricing system, an activity-based costing methodology, other indirect costs and a methodology to allocate the provision for credit losses.

The funds transfer pricing system assigns a cost of funds or a credit for funds to assets or liabilities based on their type, maturity or repricing characteristics. A segment receives a credit from Corporate Treasury for its funding sources. Conversely, a segment is assigned a charge by Corporate Treasury to fund its assets. Certain indirect costs, such as operations and technology expense, are allocated to the segments based on an activity-based costing methodology. Other indirect costs, such as corporate overhead, are allocated to the segments based on internal surveys and metrics that serve as proxies for estimated usage. During the normal course of business, the Company occasionally changes or updates its management accounting methodologies or organizational structure. Certain non-bank subsidiaries, including MUSA, are reported based on their GAAP results.

Regional Bank

The Regional Bank provides banking products and services to individual and business customers in California, Washington, and Oregon through five major business lines.

Consumer Banking serves consumers and small businesses through 341 full-service branches, digital channels, call centers, ATMs and alliances with other financial institutions. Products and services include checking and other deposit accounts; residential mortgage loans; consumer loans; home equity lines of credit; credit cards; bill and loan payment services; and merchant services.

Commercial Banking provides commercial and asset-based loans to clients across a wide range of industries with annual revenues up to $2 billion. By working with the Company's other segments, Commercial Banking clients also have access to global treasury management and capital markets solutions and foreign exchange, interest rate, and commodity risk management products.

Real Estate Industries serves professional real estate investors and developers with products such as construction loans, commercial mortgages, bridge financing and unsecured financing. Property types supported include apartment, office, retail, industrial and single-family residential on the West Coast and in select metropolitan areas across the country. Real Estate Industries also makes tax credit investments in affordable housing projects through its Community Development Finance unit referenced as LIHC investments. By working with the Company's other segments, Real Estate Industries also offers its clients global treasury management and capital markets solutions and foreign exchange, interest rate, and commodity risk management products.

Wealth Markets serves corporate, institutional, non-profit and individual clients. Capabilities include Wealth Planning and Trust & Estate Services; Investment Management through the Bank and through HighMark Capital Management, Inc., an SEC-registered investment advisory firm wholly-owned by the Bank; Brokerage services through UnionBanc Investment Services, LLC, an SEC-registered broker-dealer/investment advisory firm wholly-owned by the Bank; and Private Wealth Management.

PurePoint Financial is a national online direct bank deposit platform offering consumer savings accounts and CD products with services provided through the online platform and a call center.

75

Note 13—Business Segments (Continued)

Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S.

Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S. delivers the full suite of MUAH products and services to large and mid-corporate customers. The segment employs an industry-focused strategy including dedicated coverage teams in General Industries, Power and Utilities, Oil and Gas, Telecom and Media, Technology, Healthcare and Nonprofit, Public Finance, and Financial Institutions (predominantly Insurance and Asset Managers). Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S. provides customers general corporate credit and structured credit services, including project finance, leasing and equipment finance, funds finance and asset-based finance. By working with the Company's other segments, Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S. offers its customers a range of noncredit services, which include global treasury management, capital market solutions, and various foreign exchange, interest rate risk and commodity risk management products.

Transaction Banking

Transaction Banking works alongside the Company's other segments to provide working capital management and asset servicing solutions, including deposits and treasury management, trade finance, and institutional trust and custody, to the Company's customers. The client base consists of financial institutions, corporations, government agencies, insurance companies, mutual funds, investment managers and non-profit organizations.

MUFG Securities Americas

MUSA is MUAH's broker-dealer subsidiary which engages in capital markets origination transactions, domestic and foreign debt and equity securities transactions, private placements, collateralized financings, and securities borrowing and lending transactions.

Other

"Other" includes the MUFG Fund Services segment, Markets segment, Japanese Corporate Banking segment and Corporate Treasury. MUFG Fund Services provides comprehensive investment fund administrative solutions. Markets provides risk management solutions, including foreign exchange, interest rate and energy risk management solutions. The Japanese Corporate Banking segment offers a range of credit, deposit, and investment management products and services to companies located primarily in the U.S. that are affiliated with companies headquartered in Japan. Corporate Treasury is responsible for ALM, wholesale funding and the ALM investment and derivatives hedging portfolios. These treasury management activities are carried out to manage the net interest rate and liquidity risks of the Company's balance sheet and to manage those risks within the guidelines established by ALCO. For additional information regarding these risk management activities, see "Market Risk Management" in Part II, Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2019 Form 10 K.

Additionally, "Other" is comprised of certain corporate activities of the Company; the net impact of funds transfer pricing charges and credits allocated to the reportable segments; the residual costs of support groups; fees from affiliates and noninterest expenses associated with MUFG Bank, Ltd. U.S. branch banking operations; the unallocated allowance; goodwill, intangible assets, and the related amortization/accretion associated with the Company's privatization transaction when we became a privately held company in 2008; the elimination of the fully taxable-equivalent basis amount; the difference between the marginal tax rate and the consolidated effective tax rate; and FDIC covered assets.

76

Note 13—Business Segments (Continued)

As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020:
(Dollars in millions)	Regional Bank			Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S.			Transaction Banking		MUSA		Other		MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
Results of operations
Net interest income	$	500		$	95		$	46	$	96	$	50	$	787
Noninterest income	97			117			9		187		399		809
Total revenue	597			212			55		283		449		1,596
Noninterest expense	502			131			44		150		351		1,178
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses	317			41			—		—		3		361
Income (loss) before income taxes and including noncontrolling interests	(222		)	40			11		133		95		57
Income tax expense (benefit) (1)	(65		)	(5		)	—		34		75		39
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	(157		)	45			11		99		20		18
Deduct: net (income) loss from noncontrolling interests	—			—			—		—		4		4
Net income (loss) attributable to MUAH	$	(157	)	$	45		$	11	$	99	$	24	$	22
Total assets, end of period	$	71,941		$	21,735		$	251	$	27,881	$	45,542	$	167,350

(1) Income tax expense (benefit) includes certain management accounting classification adjustments.

As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019:
(Dollars in millions)	Regional Bank		Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S.		Transaction Banking			MUSA		Other			MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
Results of operations
Net interest income	$	573	$	133	$	52		$	37	$	(18	)	$	777
Noninterest income	118		83		9			85		354			649
Total revenue	691		216		61			122		336			1,426
Noninterest expense	538		125		41			113		337			1,154
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses	32		22		(1		)	—		3			56
Income (loss) before income taxes and including noncontrolling interests	121		69		21			9		(4		)	216
Income tax expense (benefit) (1)	20		—		6			2		(8		)	20
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	101		69		15			7		4			196
Deduct: net (income) loss from noncontrolling interests	—		—		—			—		3			3
Net income (loss) attributable to MUAH	$	101	$	69	$	15		$	7	$	7		$	199
Total assets, end of period	$	75,858	$	20,577	$	648		$	35,131	$	39,796		$	172,010

(1) Income tax expense (benefit) includes certain management accounting classification adjustments.

77

Note 13—Business Segments (Continued)

As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020:
(Dollars in millions)	Regional Bank			Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S.			Transaction Banking		MUSA		Other			MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
Results of operations
Net interest income	$	1,045		$	220		$	92	$	162	$	42		$	1,561
Noninterest income	226			207			18		238		732			1,421
Total revenue	1,271			427			110		400		774			2,982
Noninterest expense	1,026			263			84		266		740			2,379
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	684			151			—		—		(4		)	831
Income (loss) before income taxes and including noncontrolling interests	(439		)	13			26		134		38			(228		)
Income tax expense (benefit) (1)	(104		)	(27		)	3		34		158			64
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	(335		)	40			23		100		(120		)	(292		)
Deduct: net (income) loss from noncontrolling interests	—			—			—		—		8			8
Net income (loss) attributable to MUAH	$	(335	)	$	40		$	23	$	100	$	(112	)	$	(284	)
Total assets, end of period	$	71,941		$	21,735		$	251	$	27,881	$	45,542		$	167,350

(1) Income tax expense (benefit) includes certain management accounting classification adjustments.

As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019:
(Dollars in millions)	Regional Bank		Global Corporate & Investment Banking - U.S.		Transaction Banking			MUSA		Other			MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation
Results of operations
Net interest income	$	1,145	$	249	$	104		$	72	$	(10	)	$	1,560
Noninterest income	249		176		20			178		658			1,281
Total revenue	1,394		425		124			250		648			2,841
Noninterest expense	1,078		246		103			236		661			2,324
(Reversal of) provision for loan losses	80		15		(3		)	—		2			94
Income (loss) before income taxes and including noncontrolling interests	236		164		24			14		(15		)	423
Income tax expense (benefit) (1)	46		16		6			2		(22		)	48
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	190		148		18			12		7			375
Deduct: net (income) loss from noncontrolling interests	—		—		—			—		8			8
Net income (loss) attributable to MUAH	$	190	$	148	$	18		$	12	$	15		$	383
Total assets, end of period	$	75,858	$	20,577	$	648		$	35,131	$	39,796		$	172,010

(1) Income tax expense (benefit) includes certain management accounting classification adjustments.

78

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various pending and threatened legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. We maintain liabilities for losses from legal actions that are recorded when they are determined to be both probable in their occurrence and can be reasonably estimated. We believe the disposition of all claims currently pending, including potential losses from claims that may exceed the liabilities recorded, and claims for loss contingencies that are considered reasonably possible to occur, will not have a material effect, either individually or in the aggregate, on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

For a discussion of risk factors relating to our business, please refer to Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2019 Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference herein, in addition to the following information.

Industry Factors

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted our business and results of operations, and the ultimate impact of the pandemic on the U.S. and global economies, and on our business, results of operations and financial condition, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted; however, the effects of the pandemic can be reasonably expected to have an adverse impact, which could be material

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted our business and results of operation, and the ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and responsive actions taken by governmental and regulatory authorities. The pandemic and related governmental actions have negatively impacted the U.S. and global economies, disrupted supply chains, lowered equity market valuations, created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets, and increased unemployment levels. In addition, the pandemic has significantly increased economic uncertainty, reduced economic activity, and resulted in temporary closures of many businesses and the institution of social distancing and sheltering in place requirements in many states and communities, including many markets where we have operations. Governments in the U.S. and globally have taken steps to mitigate some of the more severe anticipated economic effects of the virus. Since March 13, 2020, the United States has been operating under a state of emergency declared by President Trump in response to the spread of COVID-19. During March 2020, the U.S. Congress adopted and the President signed into law the CARES Act, which provided for some $2.2 trillion in federal funding for a variety of programs designed to stimulate the U.S. economy and to soften the economic consequences of the pandemic. Also, during March 2020, in response to the pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds rate 1.5 percentage points to .00 to .25 percent, and provided other monetary support to the financial markets and financial institutions in the U.S. There can be no assurance that these and other governmental measures will be effective or achieve their desired results in a timely fashion.

In response to the pandemic, among other actions, the Bank has offered payment relief options to customers that include the option to select an initial three-month forbearance plan for our mortgage and home equity line of credit clients impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak, business loan support through participation in the SBA PPP or other relief borrowing or lending programs, flexible relief programs for our consumer and business credit card clients, including payment deferral, delinquency removal and late fee waivers, and fee refunds, including for overdraft, non-sufficient funds, monthly service charges and ATM fees, for our consumer and business deposit product customers. We expect that the overall impact of these measures on our results of operations will be material and adverse to a degree which cannot be quantified at this time. Future governmental and regulatory actions may require us to provide these and additional types of customer-related responses.

The pandemic, the early economic effects of which began to be felt late in the first quarter 2020 and have continued through the second quarter, will adversely affect our revenue, and continue to result in the recognition of credit losses in our loan portfolios and increases in our allowance for credit losses, particularly if businesses remain closed, the impact on the global economy worsens, or more customers draw on their lines of credit or seek additional loans to help finance their businesses. As the economic impacts of the pandemic continue, we may need to shift the mix of our loan portfolio. We provide financing to businesses in a number of

79

industries that may be particularly vulnerable to industry-specific economic factors that can adversely impact the performance of our commercial real estate and commercial and industrial credit portfolios. Certain of these industries, such as the retail industry and the energy industry, among others, have been, and can expected to continue to be, adversely impacted by the disruptive and recessionary market conditions caused by the pandemic, which could result in resulting in higher nonperforming assets and elevated levels of charge-offs. The pandemic has recently caused global demand for crude oil to plummet and oil futures prices to fall below zero. Continued or worsening volatility in fuel prices and energy costs could adversely affect businesses in several of these industries, while a prolonged slump in oil, natural gas and coal prices could have adverse consequences for some of our borrowers in the energy sector. Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we also may be required to recognize impairments on the securities we hold.

Our business operations may also be disrupted if significant portions of our workforce, including employees of our third-party service providers, are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic. We have already temporarily closed certain of our branches and offices, and a significant number of our employees are now working remotely rather than in our offices and branches. Remote work arrangements may exacerbate certain risks to our business, including an increased demand for information technology resources, increased risk of phishing and other cybersecurity attacks, and increased information security risk involving, among other risks, the unauthorized dissemination of sensitive personal information or proprietary or confidential information about us, our customers or other third-parties. The governmental restrictions on non-essential business travel can also be expected to adversely impact our bi-coastal and multi-state operations. The pandemic could also disrupt our operations due to absenteeism by infected or ill members of management or other employees, or members of our Board of Directors, making it more difficult to conduct meetings for the management of our affairs. The operations of our clients, customers, suppliers, third party service providers and business partners have also been, and are likely to be further, adversely impacted.

We may also experience financial losses due to a number of operational factors, including, among others: challenges to the availability and reliability of our network due to changes to normal operations or third party disruptions, including potential outages at network providers, call centers and other suppliers; increased cyber fraud risk related to COVID-19, as cybercriminals attempt to profit from the disruption, given increased online banking, e-commerce and other online activity; and new or additional regulatory requirements, which could require additional resources and costs to address. Various banks, including the Bank, that participated in the SBA PPP program or other relief borrowing or lending programs have or may have become the subject of purported class-action litigation regarding their activities under the program; there can be no assurance that additional litigation will not be brought against other banks who participate in such programs, including the Bank.

These factors may remain prevalent for a significant period of time and may continue to adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided. The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, its severity, the actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided, we may continue to experience materially adverse impacts to our business as a result of the national and global economic impact of the virus, including the availability of credit, adverse impacts on our liquidity, and any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future, or litigation, enforcement, and/or investigation activity. Market conditions due to the pandemic could also adversely impact our credit ratings. A substantial majority of our assets, deposits and interest and fee income are generated in California. The California state government continues to generally require residents to shelter in place and to keep non-essential businesses closed in response to COVID-19, and the status of reopening plans is fluid, as is the case in Washington and Oregon. Given that a large portion of our business is generated on the West Coast, a prolonged reduction in economic activity in this region could have an adverse impact, which could be material, on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect of the spread of COVID-19 as a global pandemic may have, and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of the impacts on our business, results of operations and financial condition, or on the U.S. or global economies or our market areas in particular. Given the many challenges

80

and uncertainties resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, there is a risk that conditions will be substantially different than we are currently expecting. However, the effects of the pandemic can be reasonably expected to have an adverse impact, which could be material, on our business, results of operations and financial condition, and heighten many of our known risks described in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A. of Part I our 2019 Form 10-K and in this Report on Form 10-Q.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental and regulatory actions have negatively impacted the U.S. and global economies, significantly increased economic uncertainty and reduced economic activity, resulting in recessionary economic and financial market conditions, which are likely to have resultant adverse consequences for the U.S. financial services industry and for MUAH

While the U.S. economy experienced a period of significant expansion in recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental and regulatory actions, the early economic effects of which began to be felt late in the first quarter 2020 and have continued through the second quarter, have negatively impacted the U.S. and global economies, disrupted supply chains, lowered equity market valuations, created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets, and increased unemployment levels. In addition, the pandemic has significantly increased economic uncertainty, reduced economic activity, and resulted in temporary closures of many businesses and the institution of social distancing and sheltering in place requirements in many states and communities, including many markets where we have operations. We, and other financial services companies, are impacted to a significant degree by current economic conditions.

Governments in the U.S. and globally have taken steps to mitigate some of the more severe anticipated economic effects of the virus. During March 2020, the U.S. Congress adopted and the President signed into law the CARES Act, which provided for some $2.2 trillion in federal funding for a variety of programs designed to stimulate the U.S. economy and to soften the economic consequences of the pandemic. Also, during March 2020, in response to the pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds rate 1.5 percentage points to .00 to .25 percent, and provided other monetary support to the financial markets and financial institutions in the U.S. There can be no assurance that these and other governmental measures will be effective or achieve their desired results in a timely fashion.

The various governmental stimulus measures introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have increased, and can be expected to continue to increase, federal budget deficits and the national debt level, while tax revenue can be expected to decline along with economic activity. These events can be expected to adversely affect the long-term sovereign credit rating of United States debt, and downgrades by the credit rating agencies with respect to the obligations of the U.S. federal government could occur. Any such downgrades could increase over time the U.S. federal government’s cost of borrowing, which may worsen its fiscal challenges, as well as generate upward pressure on interest rates generally in the U.S., which could, in turn, have adverse consequences for borrowers and the level of business activity. These developments could also create further challenges for the securities business conducted by MUSA, which relies upon both the credit quality of bonds issued by the U.S. federal government and the smooth functioning of the markets using such bonds as collateral, as the COVID-19 pandemic has created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets.

The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak ultimately impacts the national and global economies will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, its severity, the actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided, the U.S and global economies may continue to experience materially adverse impacts and continuing or worsening recessionary conditions. We do not yet know the full extent of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. or global economies or our market areas in particular; however, the pandemic may result in prolonged continuing or worsening recessionary economic and financial market conditions, which are likely to have adverse consequences, which could be material, for the U.S. financial services industry and for MUAH.

81

Company Factors

California economic conditions, have been, and can reasonably be expected to continue to be, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which could adversely affect our business

A substantial majority of our assets, deposits and interest and fee income is generated in California. As a result, poor economic conditions in California may cause us to incur losses associated with higher default rates and decreased collateral values in our loan portfolio.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, following a declaration of a state of emergency in early March, the California state government issued a strict shelter in place order on March 19, 2020, instituting social distancing requirements and closing all non-essential businesses. The shelter in place order does not have a specific termination date. Given the many uncertainties and challenges resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, it is difficult to predict when this shelter in place order will be lifted, and the timing of when, and the extent to which, normal economic and operating conditions can resume in the state.

In the U.S. generally, and in California in particular, the pandemic has significantly increased economic uncertainty, reduced economic activity and increased unemployment levels. While many financial institutions, including the Bank, have offered payment relief to mortgage and home equity line of credit customers impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak, among other customer-related responses, the pandemic may significantly affect the commercial and residential real estate markets in the U.S. generally, and in California and our other market areas in particular, decreasing property values, increasing the risk of defaults and reducing the value of real estate collateral. There can be no assurance that home prices in California and our other market areas will not decline as a result of the recessionary financial and market conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition, although the State of California has historically experienced budget shortfalls or deficits, during the past several years, California’s budgetary situation improved considerably. However, the various economic and health measures introduced by the legislature and the governor of the State of California in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have increased state spending at a time when the current economic slowdown can be expected to result in reduced state tax revenues, perhaps for a prolonged period.

Also, municipalities and other governmental units within California have experienced budgetary difficulties and several California municipalities filed for protection under the Bankruptcy Code. As a result, concerns have arisen regarding the outlook for the governmental obligations of California municipalities and other governmental units. If the budgetary and fiscal difficulties of the California state government and California municipalities and other governmental units recur or economic conditions in California decline, we expect that our level of problem assets could increase and our prospects for growth could be impaired.

For a number of years in the past decade, California has also experienced severe drought, wildfires or other natural disasters. It can be expected that these events will continue to occur from time to time in the areas served by the Bank, and that the consequences of these natural disasters, including programs of public utility public safety power outages when weather conditions and fire danger warrant, may adversely affect the Bank’s business and that of its customers. It is also possible that climate change may be increasing the severity or frequency of adverse weather conditions, thus increasing the impact of these types of natural disasters on our business and that of our customers.

Our credit ratings are important in order to maintain liquidity

Major credit rating agencies regularly evaluate and provide credit ratings of the securities of MUAH and the securities and deposits of MUB and also provide entity ratings for MUAH, MUB and MUSA. Their ratings of our long-term and short-term debt obligations and of our deposits and our entity ratings are based on a number of factors including our financial strength, ability to generate earnings, and other factors, some of which are not entirely within our control, such as conditions affecting the financial services industry and the economy. In light of the continually evolving conditions in the financial services industry, the financial markets and the economy, changes to credit rating methodologies and the ongoing assessment of our current and expected satisfaction of various rating criteria, no assurance can be given that we will maintain our current ratings. Further, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns over the financial impacts of the virus outbreak on the U.S. and global economies and the credit effects on companies, the major credit rating agencies may reevaluate and revise the outlook or credit ratings for many companies, including MUAH, which could result in a negative ratings action or downgrade.

82

If our long-term or short-term credit ratings suffer substantial downgrades, particularly if lowered below investment grade, such downgrades could adversely affect access to liquidity and could significantly increase our cost of funds (especially our wholesale funding), trigger additional collateral or funding requirements and decrease the number of commercial depositors, investors and counterparties willing or permitted to lend to us, thereby curtailing our business operations and reducing our ability to generate income. For additional information, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Liquidity Risk Management" in Part II, Item 7. of our 2019 Form 10-K and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Liquidity Risk Management” in Part I, Item 2. of this Form 10-Q.

Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain a specified credit rating. If our credit rating were to fall below the specified rating, the counterparties to these derivative instruments could terminate the contract and demand immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization for those derivative instruments in net liability positions.

Adverse changes in the credit ratings, operations or prospects of our parent companies, MUFG Bank, Ltd. and MUFG, could also adversely impact our credit ratings. In April 2020, Fitch placed the ratings of MUAH, MUB and MUSA on ratings watch negative as a result of Fitch’s downgrade of MUFG’s ratings to A-/F1 outlook stable from A/F1 outlook negative. This action follows Fitch’s recent revision of the U.S. Bank Sector Outlook and Rating Outlook, both to negative from stable, driven by concerns over the financial impact from COVID-19. On May 1, 2020, Fitch affirmed MUAH, MUB and MUSA's long and short-term ratings. The ratings watch negative was removed on the long-term rating and a negative outlook was assigned. The negative outlook reflects Fitch's view that there are significant operating environment challenges due to the disruption to economic activity and financial markets from the coronavirus pandemic. On August 4, 2020, Fitch revised the outlook on MUFG’s ratings to negative from stable driven by the outlook revision on the Japan sovereign rating and the sensitivity of MUFG’s ratings to the downside. In April 2020, S&P revised the outlook on MUFG to stable from positive due to S&P’s expectation that economic strain from the COVID–19 pandemic will put prolonged pressure on asset quality and revenue lowering the likelihood of being upgraded. Subsequently, S&P revised MUAH, MUB, and MUSA’s outlook to stable from positive. The stable outlook reflects S&P’s expectation that MUAH will remain a core banking subsidiary of MUFG. Furthermore, any change in MUAH’s stand–alone credit profile will not affect MUAH's credit rating, which, S&P believes will remain closely tied to MUFG. For additional information, refer to Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2019 Form 10-K under the caption “MUFG Bank Ltd.’s and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group’s credit ratings and financial or regulatory condition could adversely affect our operations”.

We rely on third parties for important products and services

Third-party vendors provide key components of our business infrastructure such as internet connections, network access and mutual fund distribution and, although we monitor their performance, we do not control their actions. Among other services provided by these vendors, third-party vendors have played and will continue to play a key role in the implementation of our technology enhancement and replacement projects, including our Transformation and Rewiring Programs. The federal banking agencies have issued enhanced guidance and are examining with increasing scrutiny financial institutions’ diligence conducted on and oversight of their third-party vendors. Any problems caused by these third parties, including those as a result of their not providing us their services for any reason or their performing their services poorly or failing to meet legal and regulatory requirements, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers, implement our technology enhancement and replacement projects or otherwise conduct our business and also could result in disputes with such vendors over the performance of their services to us, as well as adverse regulatory consequences for us. Replacing these third-party vendors on economically feasible terms may not always be possible or within our control and could also entail significant delay and expense.

The Bank relies on vendors providing overseas delivery centers in India for some of its support services. The Government of India has imposed a nation-wide quarantine in response to the pandemic, requiring employees of these centers to work remotely, generally at home, and outside of the security of these centers. This has increased the cybersecurity risk associated with these relationships. In addition, if key employees or groups of employees at the various vendors used by the Bank were to contract the COVID-19 disease and cannot work, this could adversely impact the vendor’s ability to fulfill its obligations to the Bank.

In recent years, there has been consolidation in the number of major vendors supporting financial

83

institutions such as the Bank, resulting in increased concentration risk for such institutions. This risk could be increased if the pandemic results in failures or additional combinations of such vendors.

84

Item 6.   Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(2)
101	Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020, is formatted in XBRL interactive data files: (i) Consolidated Statements of Income; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Financial Statements (1)

(1) Filed herewith.

(2) Furnished herewith. In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release No. 34-47986, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

85

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MUFG AMERICAS HOLDINGS CORPORATION (Registrant)
Date: August 7, 2020	By:	/s/ STEPHEN E. CUMMINGS
		Stephen E. Cummings President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 7, 2020	By:	/s/ JOHANNES WORSOE
		Johannes Worsoe Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: August 7, 2020	By:	/s/ NEAL HOLLAND
		Neal Holland Deputy Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

86