XML 31 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 14 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Operating Leases

 

The Company leases certain premises under various operating leases.

 

Future minimum lease payments under such operating leases are as follows:

 

Year ending      
December 31,      
       
2016   $ 1,356  
2017     424  
2018     353  
2019     316  
2020     312  
    $ 2,761  

 

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is $3,409, $3,257, and $1,694, respectively.

 

Letters of Credit and Guarantees

 

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has approximately $274 in outstanding letters of credit. Such letters of credit are being secured by $274 in restricted cash with a commercial bank (see Note 2).

 

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 the Company has €266 and €151 ($290 and $165 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively) in outstanding guarantees on its lines of credit arrangement in Europe.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks

 

As a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, numerous lawsuits charging the Company with wrongful death and/or property damage were commenced in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York (the “Court”), resulting from certain airport security services provided by the Company for United Flight 175 out of Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts.

 

All the wrongful death personal injury cases have been settled or dismissed at no cost to the Company because the payments were covered by the Company’s insurance.  The Court approved the settlements.

 

All but one of the property loss cases also has been settled at no cost to the Company, because the payments were covered by the Company’s insurance. One of the property loss cases remain pending against, among others, the Company. The Court granted defendants motion for summary judgments that the plaintiffs have appealed and oral arguments have been held. The plaintiffs in the case are seeking reimbursement for claimed damages relating to their lease of the towers. The defendants are hopeful that the remaining property loss cases will be dismissed.

 

In any event, the Company has already paid the limits of its liability insurance in settlement costs. The Company contends that a federal statute passed after the events of September 11, 2001 protects it from having to make any further monetary payments, regardless of whether it is found liable in any of the remaining cases.

 

Claims by former employees

 

The Company is subject to wrongful termination claims made by certain former employees of one of its European subsidiaries. The aggregate amount of such claims is approximately $734. At the present time, the Company is not able to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate a range of potential loss related to these matters.

 

Minimum wage increase

 

In August 2015, the Company was informed about a court decision, which approved an increase to the minimum wage for the city of SeaTac, Washington (location of Seattle Airport). The increase to the minimum wage was originally approved by a vote in King County, Washington in 2013 (to be effective January 1, 2014); however, a court ruled that SeaTac employees were excluded from this increase because the airport was under the jurisdiction of the Port of Seattle and not the city of SeaTac. In August 2015, this decision was overturned by the State Supreme Court and accordingly, the Company is required to increase the minimum wage of its employees at the SeaTac Airport according to the court decision, effective January 1, 2014. The Company has estimated that it has a liability of approximately $3,300 for back wages (inclusive of interest amounting to approximately $300) as of December 31, 2015 and has recorded an accrual for this liability.

 

The Company is also a party to a lawsuit from a former employee seeking class action status and payment of back wages.

 

General

 

The Company is subject to various investigations, claims and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities. These claims are primarily related to grievances filed by current and former employees for unfair labor practices or discrimination, and for passenger aviation claims. Management recognizes a liability for any matter when the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is deemed to be probable and the amount is able to be reasonably estimated. Management has concluded that such claims, in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

Consulting and Service Agreements

 

In June 2013, pursuant to a share purchase and transfer agreement (“Purchase Agreement”), the Company, through one of its European subsidiaries, acquired 100% of shares of Brink’s Deutsche Luftsicherheit GmbH (“BDLG”) for €25. BDLG was created prior to the consummation of the transaction as a result of a spin-off by its former parent, Brink’s Sicherheit GmbH (“BSG”). BDLG is engaged in the provision of aviation security services in Germany.

 

In April 2013, prior to the closing of the transaction described in the preceding paragraph, the Company entered into an agency agreement with a third party to assist it with this transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the agency agreement, the Company is obligated to pay this third party an agency fee in the amount of €1,000 ($1,090 as of December 31, 2015) as consideration for its services in facilitating the transaction with BDLG. The €1,000 agency fee is payable in three installments. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized a one-time expense of €1,000 ($1,323) for the agency services. As of December 31, 2015, the Company paid the agency fee in full. In addition, in the event that the operations of BDLG are sold in the future, the third party agent is entitled to an additional payment of €2,000 ($2,180 as of December 31, 2015).

 

In April 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with the same third party. The agreement is for a term of three years and obligates the Company to pay the third party an annual consulting fee of €50 ($55 as of December 31, 2015). The consultant is also entitled to commissions of 0.75% of revenue resulting from any aviation security contracts in Germany for the duration of such contracts. Should the net revenue from the aviation security contracts in Germany exceed €20,000 ($21,804 as of December 31, 2015) per year, the payment of commissions due on revenue in excess of €20,000 per year will be deferred and become due when the German operations are sold to a third party. The maximum amount of the annual commissions payable is €182 ($198 as of December 31, 2015).

 

In June 2015, the Company amended the consulting agreement. The annual commission of 0.75% of revenue was limited to €150 ($164 as of December 31, 2015) without any deferred payments. In addition, the Agency agreement was amended and in the event that the German operations are sold in the future, the third party agent is entitled to an additional payment of €3,000 ($3,271 as of December 31, 2015) instead of €2,000 ($2,180 as of December 31, 2015).