XML 86 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill And Intangible Assets
3 Months Ended
Jan. 25, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill And Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table presents a summary of the net carrying value of the Company’s intangible assets (in thousands):
 
January 25,
2014
 
October 26,
2013
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
 
 
 
Goodwill
$
1,640,629

 
$
1,645,437

In-process research and development (1)
21,590

 
21,590

Finite-lived intangible assets
 
 
 
Total intangible assets subject to amortization
2,323

 
18,668

Total intangible assets
$
1,664,542

 
$
1,685,695

(1)
Acquired in-process research and development (“IPRD”) is an intangible asset accounted for as an indefinite-lived asset until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development effort. While accounted as an indefinite-lived asset, the IPRD intangible asset is subject to testing for impairment annually, as of the first day of the second fiscal quarter, and whenever events or changes in facts and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that IPRD is impaired. If the research and development effort associated with the IPRD is successfully completed, then the IPRD intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life to be determined at the date the effort is completed. During the three months ended January 25, 2014, the IPRD intangible asset was not amortized due to the current stage of the associated research and development effort, which is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2014.
The Company performed its annual IPRD impairment test using measurement data as of the first day of the second fiscal quarter of 2013. During the test, the Company elected the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of its IPRD asset is less than its carrying amount. After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, the Company determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of its IPRD assets is less than its carrying amount and no further testing is required. During the three months ended January 25, 2014, there were no events or changes in facts and circumstances that indicated that it is more likely than not that IPRD is impaired.
The following table summarizes goodwill activity by reportable segment for the three months ended January 25, 2014 (in thousands):
 
SAN 
Products
 
IP Networking Products
 
Global Services
 
Total
Balance at October 26, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
$
176,878

 
$
1,358,975

 
$
155,416

 
$
1,691,269

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(45,832
)
 

 
(45,832
)
 
176,878

 
1,313,143

 
155,416

 
1,645,437

Divestitures (1)
(474
)
 
(3,657
)
 

 
(4,131
)
Tax and other adjustments during the three months ended January 25, 2014 (2)
(17
)
 
(660
)
 

 
(677
)
Balance at January 25, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
176,387

 
1,354,658

 
155,416

 
1,686,461

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(45,832
)
 

 
(45,832
)
 
$
176,387

 
$
1,308,826

 
$
155,416

 
$
1,640,629

(1) 
The goodwill disposed relates to the sale of the Company’s network adapter business, see Note 3, “Acquisitions and Divestitures,” of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) 
The goodwill adjustments during the three months ended January 25, 2014, were primarily a result of tax benefits from the exercise of stock awards of acquired companies.
The Company conducts its goodwill impairment test annually, as of the first day of the second fiscal quarter, and whenever events occur or facts and circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For the annual goodwill impairment test, the Company uses the income approach, the market approach or a combination thereof to determine each reporting unit’s fair value. The income approach provides an estimate of fair value based on discounted expected future cash flows (“DCF”). The market approach provides an estimate of fair value applying various observable market-based multiples to the reporting unit’s operating results and then applying an appropriate control premium. For the fiscal year 2013 annual goodwill impairment test, the Company used a combination of approaches to estimate each reporting unit’s fair value. The Company believed that at the time of the impairment testing performed in the second fiscal quarter of 2013, the income approach and the market approach were equally representative of a reporting unit’s fair value.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit or an intangible asset requires judgment and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The Company based its fair value estimates on assumptions it believes to be reasonable, but inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions with respect to the determination of the fair value of its reporting units using the income approach include, among other inputs:
The Company’s operating forecasts;
Revenue growth rates; and
Risk-commensurate discount rates and costs of capital.
The Company’s estimates of revenues and costs are based on historical data, various internal estimates and a variety of external sources, and are developed as part of our regular long-range planning process. The control premium used in market or combined approaches is determined by considering control premiums offered as part of the acquisitions that have occurred in market segments that are comparable with the Company’s reporting units. Based on the results of the annual goodwill impairment analysis performed during the second fiscal quarter of 2013, the Company determined that no impairment needed to be recorded. During the three months ended January 25, 2014, there were no facts and circumstances that indicated that the fair value of the reporting units may be less than their current carrying amount.
Intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized on a straight-line basis over the following estimated remaining useful lives, unless the Company has determined these lives to be indefinite. The following tables present details of the Company’s finite-lived intangible assets (in thousands, except for weighted-average remaining useful life):
January 25, 2014
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Useful Life
(in years)
Trade name
$
460

 
$
138

 
$
322

 
2.76
Core/developed technology
1,040

 
416

 
624

 
1.76
Customer relationships
1,080

 
268

 
812

 
3.76
Non-compete agreements
810

 
245

 
565

 
2.76
Total intangible assets (1)
$
3,390

 
$
1,067

 
$
2,323

 
2.84
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
October 26, 2013
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Useful Life
(in years)
Trade name
$
460

 
$
110

 
$
350

 
3.01
Core/developed technology
192,340

 
185,254

 
7,086

 
0.35
Customer relationships
287,090

 
276,473

 
10,617

 
0.51
Non-compete agreements
810

 
195

 
615

 
3.01
Total intangible assets
$
480,700

 
$
462,032

 
$
18,668

 
0.58

(1) 
During the three months ended January 25, 2014, $477.3 million of intangible assets became fully amortized and, therefore, were removed from the balance sheet.
The following table presents the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
January 25, 2014
 
January 26, 2013
Cost of revenues
$
6,462

 
$
10,780

Operating expenses
9,883

 
14,856

Total
$
16,345

 
$
25,636


The following table presents the estimated future amortization of finite-lived intangible assets as of January 25, 2014 (in thousands):
Fiscal Year
Estimated
Future
Amortization
2014 (remaining nine months)
$
649

2015
865

2016
553

2017
238

2018
18

Total
$
2,323