XML 61 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Re-engineering and Impairment Costs
3 Months Ended
Mar. 28, 2015
Restructuring Charges [Abstract]  
Re-engineering and Impairment Costs
Re-engineering and Impairment Costs
The Company recorded $2.7 million and $2.3 million in re-engineering charges during the first quarters of 2015 and 2014, respectively. In both years, these charges were primarily related to severance costs incurred for headcount reductions in several of the Company’s operations in connection with changes in its management and organizational structures, and in 2014, the decision to cease operating the Armand Dupree business in the United States.
The balances included in accrued liabilities related to re-engineering and impairment charges as of March 28, 2015 and December 27, 2014 were as follows:
(In millions)
March 28,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
Beginning of the year balance
$
2.4

 
$
2.6

Provision
2.7

 
11.0

Non-cash charges
(0.1
)
 
(1.8
)
Cash expenditures:
 
 
 

Severance
(2.0
)
 
(7.1
)
Other
(0.4
)
 
(2.3
)
End of period balance
$
2.6

 
$
2.4


The accrual balance as of March 28, 2015, related primarily to severance payments to be made by the end of the second quarter of 2015. In connection with the decision to cease operating the Armand Dupree business in the United States, the Company recorded $1.6 million in cost of sales for inventory obsolescence during the first quarter of 2014.
In February 2015, the Venezuelan government launched an overhaul of its foreign currency exchange structure and created a new exchange mechanism called Simadi that has provided an exchange rate significantly lower than the rate available to the Company under the previous SICAD 2 mechanism. As a result, and based on the perceived impact of this change to the operations of its Venezuelan unit, the Company deemed this change to be a triggering event to evaluate the $15.7 million of long-term fixed assets in Venezuela. This evaluation involved performing an undiscounted cash flow analysis to determine if the carrying value of the assets were recoverable and greater than fair value. The Company considered many economic and operating factors, including uncertainty surrounding the interpretation and enforcement of certain product pricing restrictions in Venezuela, the inability to obtain the necessary raw materials locally to meet production demands and the significant decline in the global price of oil. Due to the decline of the global price of oil, the Venezuelan government has not made U.S. dollars widely available through any of the exchange mechanisms it has had in place. Given the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar compared to the U.S. dollar, and the lack of U.S dollars available to use for the purchase of raw materials from on-going operations, the Company does not believe it will be able to operate the business profitably. As a result, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the long-term fixed assets in Venezuela were not recoverable. The Company then estimated the fair value of the long-term fixed assets using estimated selling prices available in Venezuela. The primary assets that were considered to continue to maintain a marketable value in Venezuela included commercial office space, a show room and parking spaces. As a result of this evaluation in the first quarter of 2015, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $13.5 million to reduce the long-term fixed asset carrying value in Venezuela to the estimated fair value of $2.2 million, which is considered a non-recurring Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.