<?xml version="1.0"?>
<edgarSubmission>

    <schemaVersion>X0304</schemaVersion>

    <submissionType>TA-1/A</submissionType>

    <testOrLive>LIVE</testOrLive>

    <formVersion>3.2.0</formVersion>

    <filer>
        <cik>0001007444</cik>
        <fileNumber>084-05637</fileNumber>
    </filer>

    <regulatoryAgency>SEC</regulatoryAgency>

    <registrant>
        <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
        <previousEntityName>LPL Financial Corporation</previousEntityName>
        <finsNumber>008698</finsNumber>
        <principalOfficeAddress>
            <street1>9785 Towne Centre Drive</street1>
            <street2></street2>
            <city>San Diego</city>
            <stateOrCountryCode>CA</stateOrCountryCode>
            <stateOrCountry>CALIFORNIA</stateOrCountry>
            <zipCode>92121</zipCode>
        </principalOfficeAddress>
        <differentMailingAddress>false</differentMailingAddress>
        <telephoneNumber>858-450-9606</telephoneNumber>
        <conductBusinessInOtherLocations>false</conductBusinessInOtherLocations>
        <selfTransferAgent>false</selfTransferAgent>
        <engagedServiceCompany>false</engagedServiceCompany>
        <engagedAsServiceCompany>false</engagedAsServiceCompany>
        <registrantType>Corporation</registrantType>
        <registrantTypeDescription></registrantTypeDescription>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Stephanie Leigh Brown</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2004-03-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>General Counsel, Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Mark Stephen Casady</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2005-12-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>CEO, Chairman of the Board</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Esther Marion Stearns</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2007-03-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Chief Operating Officer, President</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate>2012-05-01</relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>William Edward Dwyer III</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2004-01-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>LPL Holdings, Inc.</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>1989-04-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Parent Company</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>E</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Dan Hogan Arnold Jr</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2007-08-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>George Burton White</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2007-11-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director - CIO</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Denise Abood</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2008-01-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate>2012-06-30</relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Jonathan Eaton</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2008-01-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate>2012-06-30</relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Christopher F. Feeney</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2008-01-28</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Chief Information Officer</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Mark Helliker</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2008-08-04</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Robert J. Moore</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2008-09-02</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director - CFO/President</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Kathy Vannoy-Pineda</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2009-05-21</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>CCO - Brokerage</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>John J. McDermott Jr.</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2009-07-27</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Dir, Chief Enterprise Risk Ofcr</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Abdiel Alan Valenzuela</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2009-05-21</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>VP, CCO - Advisory</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate>2011-05-01</relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Derek Bruton</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2010-03-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Becky Shulman</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2011-06-06</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director, Deputy CFO</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>false</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate>2011-11-21</relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Paul Middlemiss</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2011-05-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>EVP, CCO - Advisory</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>false</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Joan Khoury</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2012-02-27</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director - Chief Mrktg Officer</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Andy Kalbaugh</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2007-07-23</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director - Institutional Svcs.</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
        <corporationPartnershipData>
            <entityName>Sallie Larsen</entityName>
            <relationshipStartDate>2012-05-01</relationshipStartDate>
            <titleOrStatus>Managing Director - Chief HC Officer</titleOrStatus>
            <ownershipCode>NA</ownershipCode>
            <controlPerson>true</controlPerson>
            <relationshipEndDate></relationshipEndDate>
        </corporationPartnershipData>
    </registrant>

    <otherControlManagement>
        <otherEntity>true</otherEntity>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>Principal Stockholder of LPL Holdings, Inc.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>Hellman &amp; Friedman Capital Partners V, L.P.</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>Stockholder of LPL Investment Holdings, Inc.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>Hellman &amp; Friedman Investors V, LLC</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>General Partner of Hellman &amp; Friedman Capital Partners V, L.P.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>TPG Partners IV, L.P.</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>Stockholder of LPL Investment Holdings, Inc.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>TPG Advisors IV, Inc.</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>General Partner of TPG Genpar IV, L.P.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>TPG Genpar IV, L.P.</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>General Partner of TPG Partners IV, L.P.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>David Bonderman</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>Stockholder of TPG Advisors IV, Inc.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
        <otherControlManagementDetails>
            <entityName>James G. Coulter</entityName>
            <agreementDescription>Stockholder of TPG Advisors IV, Inc.</agreementDescription>
        </otherControlManagementDetails>
    </otherControlManagement>

    <otherControlFinance>
        <otherEntity>false</otherEntity>
    </otherControlFinance>

    <felonyOrMisdemeanor>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </felonyOrMisdemeanor>

    <otherFelony>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </otherFelony>

    <enjoinedInvestmentRelatedActivity>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </enjoinedInvestmentRelatedActivity>

    <violationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulation>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </violationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulation>

    <falseStatementOrOmission>
        <involved>true</involved>
        <falseStatementOrOmissionDetails>
            <entityName>IFMG Securities, Inc. (IFMG)</entityName>
            <actionTitle>File No. 3-12365</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>2006-07-13</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Securities and Exchange Commission</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>Allegations that IFMG failed to disclose revenue sharing practices in violation of Sec. 17(A)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 10b-10 of the Exchange Act.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>The order instituted cease and desist proceedings and resulted in a fine $1,000,000 and disgorgement of $2,827,408.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </falseStatementOrOmissionDetails>
    </falseStatementOrOmission>

    <violationOfRegulations>
        <involved>true</involved>
        <violationOfRegulationsDetails>
            <entityName>Linsco/Private Ledger Corp. (now know as LPL Financial Corporation)(LPL)</entityName>
            <actionTitle>SEC Administrative Proceeding Rel. Nos. 33-8371 and 34-49232</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>2004-02-12</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Securities and Exchange Commission</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>Action involved allegations related to application of mutual breakpoints for eligible customers on purchases of front-end load mutual funds.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>The SEC issued and Order against LPL that resulted in a censure, monetary fine, disgorgement/restitution and cease and desist/injunction.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </violationOfRegulationsDetails>
        <violationOfRegulationsDetails>
            <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
            <actionTitle>SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 34-58515</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>2008-09-11</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Securities and Exchange Commission</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>Proceeding involved allegations of violations of the safeguards rules of Regulation S-P.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>The SEC issued an Order against LPL that resulted in a censure, monetary fine, remedial undertakings by LPL, and cease and desist/injunction.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </violationOfRegulationsDetails>
    </violationOfRegulations>

    <authorizationDeniedOrSuspended>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </authorizationDeniedOrSuspended>

    <registrationDeniedOrSuspended>
        <involved>true</involved>
        <registrationDeniedOrSuspendedDetails>
            <entityName>LPL</entityName>
            <actionTitle>SEC Administrative Proceeding Rel. Nos. 33-8371 and 34-49232</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>2004-02-12</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Securities and Exchange Commission</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>Action involved allegations related to application of mutual breakpoints for eligible customers on purchases of front-end load mutual funds.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>The SEC issued an Order against LPL that resulted in a censure, monetary fine, disgorgement/restitution and cease and desist/injunction.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </registrationDeniedOrSuspendedDetails>
    </registrationDeniedOrSuspended>

    <federalOrStateRegulatoryAgency>
        <fsrFalseStatementOrOmission>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </fsrFalseStatementOrOmission>
        <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulation>
            <involved>true</involved>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc. (UVEST)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1999-10-12</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Maryland Division of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter related to allegations that a UVEST representative had effected securities transactions in the state of Maryland after registration was terminated.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Consent Order resulted in a fine of $500</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Settlement</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1996-06-17</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>New Jersey Bureau of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter related to allegations that UVEST effected unregistered transactions in the state of New Jersey.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>UVEST was cautioned and penalized $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LINSCO Financial Group, Inc. (LFG), Todd A. Robinson, Raymond Lazcano</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. E-86-42</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1986-08-12</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Massachusetts Securities Division</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter involved allegations that LFG employed an agent (Raymond J. Lazcano) who engaged in one securities transaction while not registered in violation of Mass law.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>In 1/1987, Findings and a Final Order were entered in which Lazcano consented to the alleged violation of the Mass law.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>Private Ledger Financial Services, Inc. (PLFS)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Michigan Case No. 82-66-S</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1984-05-20</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Michigan Corporations and Securities Bureau</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter involved a client that was sold various securities by two PLFS agents who were not at the time of sale registered in Michigan, a violation of Michigan Securities Act</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>PLFS was censured and ordered to pay restitution of $11,163.00 to a Michigan client.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>Private Ledger Financial Services, Inc. (PLFS)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>State of Georgia Case No. 50-86-952(a).</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1986-05-14</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Georgia</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter involved allegations that PLFS offered for sale and sold securities which were not effectively registered nor exempt from registration.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>PLFS reimbursed the Commissioner in the amount of $1,000 and agreed to cease and desist without admitting or denying any of the findings of fact or conclusions of Law.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>Philip C. Benedict, a representative of PLFS</entityName>
                <actionTitle>State of Georgia Case No. 50-86-9529 (b)</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1985-05-05</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Georgia</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter involved allegations that Benedict sold securities which were not effectively registered nor exempt from registration.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Benedict reimbursed the Commissioner in the amount of $500 and agreed to cease and desist without admitting or denying any of the findings of fact or conclusions of Law.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. 9501-04LC</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1996-10-09</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Pennsylvania Securities Commission</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter involved conduct of an agent formerly licensed with LPL and one of its predecessor firms, Private Ledger Financial Services (PLFS).</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>LPL Consented to an order requiring it to engage and independent consultant to review its existing compliance policies &amp; procedures, pay costs of $19,304.94, and comply with PA</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1998-12-01</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Kansas Securities Corporation</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The proceeding was based on the conduct of a representative formerly licensed with LPL and one of its predecessor firms, PLFS</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>LPL agreed to review procedures and make modifications that LPL determines to be reasonable &amp; not overly burdensome &amp; offer restitution to certain customers of LPLs</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-06-28</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Texas</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Involved allegations that LPL failed to timely update its form BD to reflect the use of other business names in connection w/securities activity by certain LPL Branch offices in TX</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The order resulted in a reprimand and a fine in the amount of $10,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-12-15</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Matter arose from allegations that UVEST operated six branch offices without properly registering them with the Office of Financial Regulations</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The order resulted in a fine of $30,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2004-10-07</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Matter arose from allegations that UVEST operated twelve branch offices without properly registering them with the Office of Financial Regulations</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The order resulted in a fine of $29,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>Waterstone Financial Group, Inc. (WFG)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case Number: 8900773</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1989-12-28</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Illinois Department of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved sales of securities by unregistered representative.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a stipulation and consent, which involved a censure and fine of $500</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>WFG</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case Number: 8900773</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1989-12-28</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Illinois Department of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations were that Long Grove Trading Company sold securities through unregistered salesperson.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $500.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>Mutual Service Corporation (MSC)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Cease and Desist Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1999-02-01</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Minnesota</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved violation of Minnesota statutes for failure to license and supervise an agent in its capacity as a broker/dealer.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a cease and desist order and fine of $1,500.00</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>MSC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>2655-S-5/00</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2000-06-02</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of FL, Dept of Banking and Finance, Div of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved operating a branch location within the state of FL without the benefit of proper registration.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a cease and desist and fine of $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>2007-03-01</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2007-11-20</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Pennsylvania</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations that at certain times between 1998 and 2006, LPL failed to maintain or enforce procedures reasonably designed to supervise one or more of its agents in PA.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a $200,000 administrative assessment and $30,000 for investigative and legal costs.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>IFMG</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket No. 93-061-S</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1993-11-29</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of VT, Dept. of Banking, Insurance and Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations that IFMG transacted business in VT prior to filing an application for branch office registration and submission of filing fee.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Consent order resulted in a fine of $3000 and $500 for costs and agreement to comply with the VT Securities Act and regulations and to reasonably supervise its agents.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation (LPL)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. SEC-2009-46</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-10-26</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Montana Office of the State Auditor, Commissioner of Securities and Insurance</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations that LPL failed to reasonably supervise a registered representative.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Consent order resulted in LPL agreeing to pay restitution of $1,144,416.51 and a fine to the State of MT of $150,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation (LPL)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>SEU-2007-73</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-08-18</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Hawaii</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation of failure to disclose to clients material information in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of securities.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Consent agreement resulted in an administrative penalty of $10,000.00</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
                <actionTitle>2010-AH-012</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-12-08</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Kentucky Division of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL paid advisory compensation to an agent who was not qualified and was not registered as an investment advisor representative.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>$4000 fine.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case Number 0800381</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2010-07-12</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Illinois</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL failed to detect role of one of its representatives in the sale of participations in oil and gas projects.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in a $300,000.00 fine and restitution of $167,796.00</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
            <fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case Number: AP-10-16</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2010-08-11</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Missouri</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Matter involved sale of variable annuity contract in which representative allegedly misunderstood how a rider operated.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in a censure and $37,540.00 in total for fine, restitution and interest.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulationDetails>
        </fsrViolationOfInvestmentRelatedRegulation>
        <fsrAuthorizationDeniedOrSuspended>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </fsrAuthorizationDeniedOrSuspended>
        <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicant>
            <involved>true</involved>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2004-10-07</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Matter arose from allegations that UVEST operated twelve branch offices without properly registering them with the Office of Regulations.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The order resulted in a fine of $29,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-12-15</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Florida Financial Regulation</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose from allegations that UVEST operated six branch offices without properly registering them with the Office of Financial Regulations</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The order resulted in a fine of $30,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Order</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-06-28</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Texas</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Involved allegations with LPL failed to timely update its Form BD to reflect the use of other business names in connection w/securities activity by certain LPL branch offices in TX</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The order resulted in a reprimand and a fine in the amount of $10,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>MSC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>2665-S-5/00</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2000-06-02</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of FL, Dept. of Banking and Finance, Div of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved operating a branch location within the state of FL without the benefit of proper registration.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a cease and desist and fine of $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
                <actionTitle>SEU-2007-73</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-08-18</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Hawaii</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation of failure to disclose to clients material information in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of securities.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Consent agreement resulted in an administrative penalty of $10,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation (LPL)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. SEC-2009-46</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-10-26</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Montana Office of the State Auditor, Commissioner of Securities and Insurance</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations that LPL failed to reasonably supervise a registered representative.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Consent order resulted in LPL agreeing to pay restitution of $1,144,416.51 and a fine to the State of MT of $150,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2010-AH-012</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-12-08</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>Kentuck Division of Securities</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL paid advisory compensation to an agent who was not qualified and was not registered as an investment advisor representative.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>$4,000 fine.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 0800381</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2010-07-12</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Illinois</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL failed to detect role of one of its representatives in the sale of participations in oil and gas projects.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in a $300,000 fine and restitution of $167,796.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. 1000096</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-10-24</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Illinois</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL failed to supervise a registered representative.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in $1,885,000.00 restitution to customers.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. 2009-10-06</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-12-06</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Pennsylvania</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL failed to supervise two registered representatives.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in $59,092.52 fine for investigative costs.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
            <fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. S-07-0001-2</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-11-08</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>State of Oregon</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation that LPL failed to supervise OSJ managers transactions.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in $100,000.00 fine.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicantDetails>
        </fsrFoundOrderAgainstApplicant>
        <fsrRegistrationDeniedOrSuspended>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </fsrRegistrationDeniedOrSuspended>
        <fsrRevokedSuspendedLicense>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </fsrRevokedSuspendedLicense>
    </federalOrStateRegulatoryAgency>

    <selfRegulatoryAgency>
        <sraFalseStatementOrOmission>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </sraFalseStatementOrOmission>
        <sraViolationOfRules>
            <involved>true</involved>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>PLFS</entityName>
                <actionTitle>NASD action</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1980-06-04</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD District 2 Business Conduct Committee</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved failure to supervise branch office for use of stationary and business cards and failure to use name of PLFS on front door of branch office in a phone book</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Fine of $500</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2003-02-13</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of a representatives unauthorized participation/postings on electronic bulletin boards</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $5,000 and an undertaking to revise LPLs written supervisory procedures concerning communications with the public via electronic media.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2003-03-27</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose from an error in reporting 23 transactions in FIPS securities within five minutes after execution.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2004-02-12</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Action involved allegations related to application of mutual breakpoints for eligible customers on purchases of front-end load mutual funds.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>LPL was censured and fine $2,232,805 and made various other undertakings to the NASD.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2004-10-11</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter involved allegations related to two municipal bond liquidations.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in censure and fine of $5000, restitution of $4,662, and undertaking to review written supervisory procedures related to determining FMV of municipal securities.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2004-11-30</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of LPLs alleged late filing of amendments to Form U4 (Question 14) and Form U5 (Question 7) from January 2002 through March 2004.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a censure, fine in the amount of $450,000.00 and various undertakings by LPL</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-06-08</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of LPLs acceptance of directed brokerage payments from mutual fund companies</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $3,602,398</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-11-14</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations were that LPL failed to establish, maintain and enforce reasonable system of procedures to supervise activities of registered persons in connection w/wire transfers.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine of $75,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-12-19</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Matter arose out of allegations related to recommendations to customers for the purchase of mutual fund Class B and C shares.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $2,400,000.00</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-01-06</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of allegations related to violations of NASD rules regarding the termination of research coverage of subject companies.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a fine of $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-12-21</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations were that during a period, LPL failed to establish, maintain and enforce adequate supervisory system reasonably related to variable annuity exchange business.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in various undertakings by LPL.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2001-10-01</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of allegations that UVESTs quarterly focus report was received one day late of the filing deadline.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine in the amount of $1,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-05-09</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of allegations that UVEST failed to preserve and supervise electronic communications in accordance with SEC and NASD rules.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $80,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-07-31</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>The matter arose out of allegations that UVEST failed to report to TRACE transactions in TRACE-Eligible securities.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $20,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>Philadelphia Corporation for Investment Services (PCIS)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-02-01</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations were during period 3 municipal security transactions and 11 transactions in TRACE eligible securities were not reported accurately.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $5,000.  PCIS is no longer registered as a b-d or investment adviser.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2007-04-17</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations were that LPL failed to timely amend representatives Forms U4 with material information.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>Associated Securities Corp. (ASC)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Acceptance, Waiver and Consent</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2006-10-26</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations were that during time period ASC violated NASD rule 6230(B) for failing to report Trace eligible securities and for having deficient WSPs regarding Trace reporting.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $15,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>MSC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>CHI-813-AWC</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1985-08-01</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved the late filing of focus report part I.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The matter resulted in a letter of caution and a fine in the amount of $100.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>MSC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>AWC-C050100</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2001-12-05</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved MSCs written supervisory procedures with respect to the sale of variable products during a period of time.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>The AWC resulted in a fine of $35,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>MSC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>EAF04008300</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-08-16</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved violations of NASD Conduct Rules 2830(k) and 2110.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $1,300,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>E072005012701</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2007-09-06</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved AML compliance program, branch inspections, supervision of outside securities accounts, customer complaint reporting and Form U-4/U-5 amendments.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $39,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>UVEST</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket No. 200600556502</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2007-11-06</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Alleged violations of Rules 2110 and 3010(a) re: alleged failure to take appropriate and timely action to ensure falsified IRA adoption agreements were corrected.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $50,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>IFMG</entityName>
                <actionTitle>E9B2004007201</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2005-12-16</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved failure to comply with NASD Rules 3011(A) and 3011(B).  Violation of MSRB Rule G-41.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine in the amount of $10,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>IFMG</entityName>
                <actionTitle>N/A</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1987-06-18</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved violation of interpretation of free-riding and withholding.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Order resulted in a censure and fine of $15,000 (including disgorgement of $9,350).</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>SCA Development, Inc. (SCA)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>NASD</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2002-05-07</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>C05020022</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved violations of SEC Rule 15c2-4 and NASD Rule 2110.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine of $10,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>SCA</entityName>
                <actionTitle>C05980053</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>1999-01-19</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>NASD</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved violations of NASD Rules 2110 and 3010.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a censure and fine of $20,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>MSC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>EAF040063001</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-02-02</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Alleged violation of NASD Conduct Rules 2110, 3110, 3010A, B, C, 8210 and Exchange Act Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>MSC fined $1,535,000 and ordered to pay $19,846 in hearing costs.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial Corporation (LPL)</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2008013716201</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2009-09-04</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved failure to comply with MSRB Rule G-14.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a fine to LPL of $5,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2009016570001</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-01-20</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved review of e-mails.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Resulted in a censure and fine of $100,000.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2009016922702</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-01-20</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved review of procedures on transmittal of cash and securities from customer accounts to third party accounts.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Resulted in a censure and fine of $100,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2007011340401</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-01-06</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved LPL did not use reasonable diligence to ascertain best inter-dealer market and failed to buy or sell in such market so that the resulting price to customers was as favorable as possible.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Resulted in a censure and fine of $20,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2009017682701</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2010-12-22</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved procedures on supervision of variable annuity exchanges.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Resulted in a censure and fine of $175,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. E062004027401</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2008-06-03</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved failure to supervise a registered representative in connection with his/her use of strategies, marketing materials and appropriateness of investments.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Resulted in a censure and fine of $125,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Docket/Case No. 2010021545201</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-06-08</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegations involved procedures on supervision of advertising/public appearances</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>AWC resulted in a fine of $25,000</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. 2010024975401</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2012-06-26</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation of trade reporting violation.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in censure and $17,000.00 fine.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
            <sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
                <entityName>LPL Financial LLC</entityName>
                <actionTitle>Case No. 2008012537201</actionTitle>
                <actionDate>2011-07-26</actionDate>
                <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>FINRA</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
                <actionDescription>Allegation of trade reporting violation.</actionDescription>
                <dispositionOfProceeding>Matter resulted in censure and $22,500.00 fine.</dispositionOfProceeding>
            </sraViolationOfRulesDetails>
        </sraViolationOfRules>
        <sraAuthorizationDeniedOrSuspended>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </sraAuthorizationDeniedOrSuspended>
        <sraRevokedSuspendedLicense>
            <involved>false</involved>
        </sraRevokedSuspendedLicense>
    </selfRegulatoryAgency>

    <foreignAgency>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </foreignAgency>

    <subjectOfProceedings>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </subjectOfProceedings>

    <revokedBond>
        <involved>true</involved>
        <revokedBondDetails>
            <entityName>N/A</entityName>
            <actionTitle>N/A</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>1989-12-01</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>N/A</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>A claim for recovery of corporate funds embezzled by an employee (not securities licensed) in the Private Ledger Financial Services Accounting Department.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>Claim was paid in late 1989 by the National Union Fire Insurance Company.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </revokedBondDetails>
        <revokedBondDetails>
            <entityName>N/A</entityName>
            <actionTitle>N/A</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>2006-12-01</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>N/A</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>Claim for recovery of customer funds misappropriated by a registered representative of LPL.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>Claim was paid during 2004 through 2006 by Zurich American.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </revokedBondDetails>
        <revokedBondDetails>
            <entityName>N/A</entityName>
            <actionTitle>N/A</actionTitle>
            <actionDate>2007-07-27</actionDate>
            <courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>N/A</courtOrBodyNameAndLocation>
            <actionDescription>Claim of misappropriation of funds by former registered representative of LPL.</actionDescription>
            <dispositionOfProceeding>Claim of $50,000 was paid on July 27, 2007 by Zurich.</dispositionOfProceeding>
        </revokedBondDetails>
    </revokedBond>

    <unsatisfiedJudgementsOrLiens>
        <involved>false</involved>
    </unsatisfiedJudgementsOrLiens>

    <signatureData>
        <signatureName>Greg M. Woods</signatureName>
        <signatureTitle>Executive Vice President, Deputy General Counsel</signatureTitle>
        <signaturePhoneNumber>617-423-3644</signaturePhoneNumber>
        <signatureDate>2012-08-29</signatureDate>
    </signatureData>
</edgarSubmission>
