COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT The Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Court”) on or about December 21, 2020. The plaintiffs, Eileen Brodsky and Rhonda Diamond, purported to represent a class of individuals who purchased coffee products at one of the Company’s supermarket customers, generally allege that such client sold private label coffee products manufactured by the Company and one of its partners, which falsely described the number of cups of coffee that could be made from the amount of product purchased. These parties were also named as defendants in the action. The complaint asserted a variety of claims under New York and California consumer protection laws, and sought unspecified monetary damages, including disgorgement and restitution, as well as other forms of relief including class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and interest. On September 28, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Company’s motion to dismiss with prejudice (the “Dismissal Order”). In the Dismissal Order, the Court stated that no reasonable coffee drinker would be deceived by the Company’s packaging. The plaintiffs filed an appeal with the 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Appeal”). After the Appeal was filed, the Company settled the matter during mediation in late January 2022 and the Appeal was dismissed. COFFEE HOLDING CO., INC. NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JANUARY 31, 2023 (UNAUDITED) NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (cont’d): A significant customer of the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on or about February 2, 2021, concerning the labeling on private label coffee productions the Company sold to the customer. The plaintiff, David Cohen, purporting to represent a class of individuals who purchased coffee products from the Company’s customer, generally alleged that the customer sold private label coffee products manufactured by the Company which falsely described the number of cups of coffee that could be made from the amount of product purchased. The Company is not named as a defendant in the action, but the Company agreed to indemnify the customer for the costs and expenses incurred in defending the lawsuit and for any liability the customer may suffer as a result. The complaint asserts a variety of claims under Massachusetts consumer protection laws, and seeks unspecified monetary damages as well as other forms of relief including class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and interest. The parties have finalized the details of a settlement agreement. The final settlement amount was immaterial to the Company’s operations and results of operations. The Company has a 401(k) Retirement Plan, which covers all the full time employees who have completed one year of service and have reached their 21st birthday. The Company matches 100% of the aggregate salary reduction contribution up to the first 3% of compensation and 50% of aggregate contribution of the next 2% of compensation.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2023

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

The Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Court”) on or about December 21, 2020. The plaintiffs, Eileen Brodsky and Rhonda Diamond, purported to represent a class of individuals who purchased coffee products at one of the Company’s supermarket customers, generally allege that such client sold private label coffee products manufactured by the Company and one of its partners, which falsely described the number of cups of coffee that could be made from the amount of product purchased. These parties were also named as defendants in the action. The complaint asserted a variety of claims under New York and California consumer protection laws, and sought unspecified monetary damages, including disgorgement and restitution, as well as other forms of relief including class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and interest. On September 28, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Company’s motion to dismiss with prejudice (the “Dismissal Order”). In the Dismissal Order, the Court stated that no reasonable coffee drinker would be deceived by the Company’s packaging. The plaintiffs filed an appeal with the 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Appeal”). After the Appeal was filed, the Company settled the matter during mediation in late January 2022 and the Appeal was dismissed.

COFFEE HOLDING CO., INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JANUARY 31, 2023

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (cont’d):

A significant customer of the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on or about February 2, 2021, concerning the labeling on private label coffee productions the Company sold to the customer. The plaintiff, David Cohen, purporting to represent a class of individuals who purchased coffee products from the Company’s customer, generally alleged that the customer sold private label coffee products manufactured by the Company which falsely described the number of cups of coffee that could be made from the amount of product purchased. The Company is not named as a defendant in the action, but the Company agreed to indemnify the customer for the costs and expenses incurred in defending the lawsuit and for any liability the customer may suffer as a result. The complaint asserts a variety of claims under Massachusetts consumer protection laws, and seeks unspecified monetary damages as well as other forms of relief including class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and interest. The parties have finalized the details of a settlement agreement. The final settlement amount was immaterial to the Company’s operations and results of operations.

The Company has a 401(k) Retirement Plan, which covers all the full time employees who have completed one year of service and have reached their 21st birthday. The Company matches 100% of the aggregate salary reduction contribution up to the first 3% of compensation and 50% of aggregate contribution of the next 2% of compensation.