UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from           to

Commission File Number: 0-27876

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	86-0787377
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

14400 North 87^th Street
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
(480) 308-3000
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) had been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ      No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer þ	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o     No þ

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, was 30,596,843 as of May 2, 2008.

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page No.
PART I: INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007	5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007	6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	35
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	36
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	37
Item 1A. Risk Factors	37
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	45
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	45
Item 5. Other Information	45
Item 6. Exhibits	45
Signature	46
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1

2

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts, unaudited)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2008			2007
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	109,718		$	95,288
Accounts receivable, net		82,543			74,659
Income tax receivable		—			463
Deferred tax asset		8,274			8,203
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		17,993			15,925
Total current assets		218,528			194,538
Non-Current Assets:
Property and equipment, net		45,555			44,858
Goodwill		134,561			134,561
Other Intangibles, net:
Customer lists		138,688			144,344
Acquired software technology		27,936			29,437
Trademarks		2,593			3,013
Deferred tax asset		62,384			62,029
Other non-current assets		9,740			9,445
Total non-current assets		421,457			427,687
Total Assets	$	639,985		$	622,225
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,978		$	3,559
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		43,876			48,559
Income tax payable		2,270			—
Current portion of long-term debt		1,750			7,027
Deferred revenue		86,491			67,530
Total current liabilities		139,365			126,675
Non-Current Liabilities:
Long-term debt		92,164			92,536
Accrued exit and disposal obligations		11,059			11,797
Liability for uncertain tax positions		5,529			5,421
Total non-current liabilities		108,752			109,754
Total Liabilities		248,117			236,429
Redeemable Preferred Stock		50,000			50,000
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized, 50,000,000 shares; issued 31,658,681 and 31,378,768 shares, respectively		317			314
Additional paid-in capital		299,921			295,694
Deferred compensation		(6,526	)		(3,526	)
Retained earnings		58,500			53,144
Accumulated other comprehensive gain		4,743			3,814
		356,955			349,440
Less treasury stock, at cost, 1,268,612 and 1,189,269 shares, respectively		(15,087	)		(13,644	)
Total stockholders’ equity		341,868			335,796
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	639,985		$	622,225

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except earnings per share data, unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
REVENUES:
Software licenses	$	20,036		$	17,028
Maintenance services		45,812			44,478
Product revenues		65,848			61,506
Consulting services		25,824			26,749
Reimbursed expenses		2,203			2,462
Service revenues		28,027			29,211
Total revenues		93,875			90,717
COST OF REVENUES:
Cost of software licenses		1,053			465
Amortization of acquired software technology		1,501			1,871
Cost of maintenance services		11,196			11,053
Cost of product revenues		13,750			13,389
Cost of consulting services		19,860			21,274
Reimbursed expenses		2,203			2,462
Cost of service revenues		22,063			23,736
Total cost of revenues		35,813			37,125
GROSS PROFIT		58,062			53,592
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Product development		13,676			13,787
Sales and marketing		16,109			14,808
General and administrative		11,600			10,288
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			288
Amortization of intangibles		6,076			3,963
Restructuring charges and adjustments to acquisition-related reserves		756			4,044
Gain on sale of office facility		—			(4,128	)
Total operating expenses		48,217			43,050
OPERATING INCOME		9,845			10,542
Interest expense and amortization of loan fees		(2,482	)		(3,450	)
Interest income and other, net		1,297			669
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION		8,660			7,761
Income tax provision		3,304			2,345
NET INCOME	$	5,356		$	5,416
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	.16		$	.16
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	.15		$	.16
SHARES USED TO COMPUTE:
Basic earnings per share		33,924			33,069
Diluted earnings per share		35,085			33,563

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
NET INCOME	$	5,356		$	5,416
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Change in fair value of interest rate swap		(456	)		(185	)
Foreign currency translation gain		1,385			192
Total other comprehensive income		929			7
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	6,285		$	5,423

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)

	Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	2008			2007
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	5,356		$	5,416
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		10,055			8,234
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			288
Amortization of loan origination fees		164			548
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		(5	)		(92	)
Share-based compensation expense		1,182			888
Net gain on sale of office facility		—			(4,128	)
Net gain on disposal of property and equipment		—			26
Deferred income taxes		(426	)		15
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisition:
Accounts receivable		(7,975	)		(7,893	)
Income tax receivable		458			—
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(2,556	)		(3,096	)
Accounts payable		1,403			750
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(5,653	)		(1,078	)
Income tax payable		2,355			1,039
Deferred revenue		18,741			17,501
Net cash provided by operating activities		23,099			18,418
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Payment of direct costs related to acquisitions		(1,368	)		(2,305	)
Purchase of other property and equipment		(2,169	)		(2,536	)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		69			6,801
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(3,468	)		1,960
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock — equity plans		43			1,543
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		5			92
Purchase of treasury stock		(1,443	)		(28	)
Principal payments on term loan agreement		(5,649	)		(15,000	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(7,044	)		(13,393	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash		1,843			559
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		14,430			7,544
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		95,288			53,559
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	109,718		$	61,103

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)

	Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	2008		2007
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	761	$	1,372
Cash paid for interest	$	2,051	$	2,795
Cash received for income tax refunds	$	205	$	71
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
Decrease in retained earnings from an accrual for uncertain tax positions	$	—	$	1,006
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Reduction of goodwill recorded in the acquisition of Manugistics Group, Inc.	$	—	$	3,998

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except percentages, shares, per share amounts, or as otherwise stated)
(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

          The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of JDA Software Group, Inc. (“we” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair and comparable presentation have been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

          The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

          Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to conform to the current presentation. In the consolidated statement of income, we have separately reported the provision for doubtful accounts in operating expenses under the caption “Provision for doubtful accounts.” The provision for doubtful accounts was previously reported in operating expenses under the caption “General and administrative.” Beginning in 2008, foreign currency gains and losses will be reported in the consolidated statements of income under the caption “Interest income and other, net.” Foreign currently gains and losses have previously been reported in operating expenses under the caption “General and administrative” and were not material

2. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. While SFAS No. 157 will not impact our valuation methods, it will expand our disclosures of assets and liabilities which are recorded at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

          In February 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective beginning the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We do not currently intend to expand the use of fair value measurements in our financial reporting.

3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

          We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS No. 133”). We use derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange contracts, to manage a majority of the foreign currency exchange exposure associated with net short-term foreign denominated assets and liabilities which exist as part of our ongoing business operations that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the subsidiary. The exposures relate primarily to the gain or loss recognized in earnings from the settlement of current foreign denominated assets and liabilities. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The forward exchange contracts generally have maturities of less than 90 days and are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133. The forward exchange contracts are marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period, with gains and losses recognized in other income offset by the gains or losses resulting from the settlement of the underlying foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

8

          At March 31, 2008, we had forward exchange contracts with a notional value of $19.6 million and an associated net forward contract receivable of $436,000. At December 31, 2007, we had forward exchange contracts with a notional value of $28.4 million and an associated net forward contract liability of $131,000. The forward contract receivables or liabilities are included under the captions “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” or “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” as appropriate. The notional value represents the amount of foreign currencies to be purchased or sold at maturity and does not represent our exposure on these contracts. We recorded a foreign currency exchange contract gain of $498,000 in first quarter 2008 and a foreign currency exchange contract loss of $58,000 in first quarter 2007.

          We are exposed to interest rate risk in connection with our long-term debt which provides for quarterly interest payments at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) + 2.25%. To manage this risk, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement on July 28, 2006 to fix LIBOR at 5.365% on $140 million, or 80% of the aggregate term loans. The interest rate swap was structured with decreasing notional amounts to match our expected pay down of the debt. The notional value of the interest rate swap was $76.0 million at March 31, 2008 and represented approximately 81% of the aggregate term loan balance. The interest rate swap agreement is effective through October 5, 2009 and has been designated a cash flow hedge derivative. We evaluate the effectiveness of the cash flow hedge derivative on a quarterly basis. During first quarter 2008 the hedge was highly effective and a net unrealized loss of $456,000 was recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income.” The interest rate swap had a negative fair value of $1.8 million as of March 31, 2008. This value was determined in accordance with SFAS No. 157 using Level 2 observable inputs and approximates the net loss that would have been realized if the contract had been settled as of March 31, 2008.

4. Goodwill and Other Intangibles, net

          Goodwill and other intangible assets consist of the following:

		March 31, 2008					December 31, 2007
		Gross
	Estimated	Carrying		Accumulated			Gross Carrying		Accumulated
	Useful Lives	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amortization
Goodwill		$	134,561	$	—		$	134,561	$	—
Other intangibles:
Amortized intangible assets
Customer Lists	8 to 13 years		183,383		(44,695	)		183,383		(39,039	)
Acquired software technology	5 to 15 years		65,847		(37,911	)		65,847		(36,410	)
Trademarks	3 to 5 years		5,191		(2,598	)		5,191		(2,178	)
			254,421		(85,204	)		254,421		(77,627	)
		$	388,982	$	(85,204	)	$	388,982	$	(77,627	)

          We found no indication of impairment of our goodwill balances during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and, absent future indicators of impairment, the next annual impairment test will be performed in fourth quarter 2008. As of March 31, 2008, the goodwill balance has been allocated to our reporting units as follows: $86.6 million to Retail, $44.3 million to Manufacturing and Distribution, and $3.7 million to Services Industries.

          Amortization expense for first quarter 2008 and 2007 was $7.6 million and $5.8 million, respectively. The increase in first quarter 2008 results primarily from a change in the estimated useful life of certain customer lists to reflect current trends in attrition. With this change, the quarterly amortization expense on customer lists increased approximately $2.1 million per quarter, beginning first quarter 2008 and continuing over the remaining useful life of the related customer lists which extend through June 2014. This change had a $0.04 per share impact (reduction) on first quarter 2008 basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

          Amortization expense is reported in the consolidated statements of income within cost of revenues under the caption “Amortization of acquired software technology” and in operating expenses under the caption “Amortization of intangibles.” As of March 31, 2008, we expect amortization expense for the remainder of 2008 and the next four years to be as follows:

9

Year	Amortization
2008	$	22,003
2009	$	27,554
2010	$	26,277
2011	$	25,962
2012	$	25,500

5. Acquisition Reserves

          In conjunction with the acquisition of Manugistics, we recorded initial acquisition reserves of $47.4 million for restructuring charges and other direct costs associated with the acquisition. These costs related primarily to facility closures, employee severance and termination benefits, investment banker fees, change-in-control payments, and legal and accounting costs. We decreased the acquisition reserves by $3.3 million in 2007 based on our revised estimates of the restructuring costs to exit certain of the activities of Manugistics. Substantially all of these adjustments were made by June 30, 2007 and included in the final purchase price allocation. Any adjustments made subsequent to June 30, 2007 have been included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations under the caption “Restructuring charges and adjustments to acquisition-related reserves.” The unused portion of the acquisition reserves was $16.8 million at March 31, 2008, of which $5.8 million is included in current liabilities under the caption “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” and $11.0 million is included in non-current liabilities under the caption “Accrued exit and disposal obligations.”

          A summary of the charges and adjustments recorded against the reserves is as follows:

									Impact of										Impact of
									Changes in		Balance								Changes in			Balance
	Initial		Adjustments			Cash			Exchange		December 31,		Adjustments			Cash			Exchange			March 31,
Description of charge	Reserve		to Reserves			Charges			Rates		2007		to Reserves			Charges			Rates			2008
Restructuring charges under EITF 95-3:
Office closures, lease terminations and sublease costs	$	29,212	$	(3,381	)	$	(9,246	)	$	91	$	16,676	$	—		$	(1,213	)	$	(10	)	$	15,453
Employee severance and termination benefits		3,607		(190	)		(2,297	)		95		1,215		(38	)		(7	)		95			1,265
IT projects, contract termination penalties, capital lease buyouts and other costs to exit activities of Manugistics		1,450		249			(1,484	)		—		215		—			(148	)		—			67
		34,269		(3,322	)		(13,027	)		186		18,106		(38	)		(1,368	)		85			16,785
Direct costs under SFAS No. 141:
Legal and accounting costs		3,367		52			(3,368	)		—		51		—			—			—			51
Investment banker fees		4,555		—			(4,555	)		—		—		—			—			—			—
Dealer manager, paying agent, depository and information agent fees		259		—			(259	)		—		—		—			—			—			—
Due diligence fees and expenses		335		—			(335	)		—		—		—			—			—			—
Filing fees, valuation services and other		242		(46	)		(196	)		—		—		—			—			—			—
Change-in-control payments		4,367					(4,367	)		—		—		—			—			—			—
		13,125		6			(13,080	)		—		51		—			—			—			51
Total	$	47,394	$	(3,316	)	$	(26,107	)	$	186	$	18,157	$	(38	)	$	(1,368	)	$	85		$	16,836

          The office closures, lease termination and sublease costs are costs of a plan to exit an activity of an acquired company as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3 (“EITF No. 95-3”), Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, and include the estimated costs of management’s plan to shut down and/or vacate eight offices of Manugistics shortly after the acquisition date. These costs have no future economic benefit to the Company and are incremental to the other costs incurred by the Company or Manugistics. Adjustments made to the initial reserve for

10

facility closures are due primarily to our revised estimates and finalization of market adjustments on unfavorable office facility leases in Rockville, Maryland and the United Kingdom and adjustments for sublease rentals, primarily in the Rockville facility.

          Employee severance and termination benefits are costs resulting from a plan to terminate employees from the acquired company as described in EITF No. 95-3. As of the consummation date of the acquisition, executive management approved a plan to terminate approximately 110 of the 765 full time employees of Manugistics. In the first three months following the consummation of the Manugistics acquisition, management completed the assessment of which employees would be terminated and communicated the termination arrangements to the affected employees in accordance with statutory requirements of the local jurisdictions in which the employees were located. Adjustments made to the initial reserve for employee severance and termination benefits are due primarily to our revised estimate of settlement costs on certain foreign employees. As of March 31, 2008, the remaining balance in the reserve is related to certain foreign employees.

6. Restructuring Charges

2008 Restructuring Charge

          We recorded a restructuring charge of $794,000 in first quarter 2008 that included $722,000 in termination benefits, primarily related to a workforce reduction of 13 consulting and sales-related positions in the United States and the European region, and $72,000 for office closure and integration costs of redundant office facilities. As of March 31, 2008, substantially all costs associated with these restructuring charges have been paid with the exception of $168,000 which is primarily for termination benefits for foreign employees and included in the caption “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities.” We expect substantially all of the remaining costs to be paid in 2008.

2007 Restructuring Charges

          We recorded restructuring charges of $6.2 million in 2007 including $4.0 million in first quarter 2007. The restructuring charges included $5.9 million for termination benefits primarily related to a workforce reduction of approximately 120 full-time employees (“FTE”) in our Scottsdale, Arizona product development group as a direct result of our decision to standardize future product offerings on the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform and a reduction of approximately 40 FTE in our worldwide consulting services group. The restructuring charges also included $292,000 for the closure and integration costs of redundant office facilities. As of March 31, 2008, all costs associated with the 2007 restructuring charges have been paid with the exception of a $167,000 reserve for termination benefits, primarily for foreign employees, and a $39,000 reserve for office closures which are included in the caption “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities.” We expect substantially all of the remaining termination benefits and office closure costs to be paid in 2008.

7. Long-term Debt

          During first quarter 2008, we repaid $5.6 million of our long-term debt including a scheduled quarterly installment of $437,500 plus an additional $5.2 million mandatory repayment based on a percentage of our annual excess cash flow, as defined in the agreement. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 long-term debt consists of the following:

	March 31,			December 31,
	2008			2007
Term loans, bearing variable interest based on LIBOR + 2.25% per annum, due in quarterly installments of $437,500 through July 5, 2013, with the remaining balance due at maturity	$	93,914		$	99,563
Less current portion		(1,750	)		(7,027	)
	$	92,164		$	92,536

          We have entered into an interest rate swap agreement to fix LIBOR at 5.365% (see Note 3). As of March 31, 2008, scheduled principal maturities for the remainder of 2008 and the next four years and thereafter are as follows:

11

Year	Scheduled Maturities
2008	$	1,313
2009		1,750
2010		1,750
2011		1,750
2012		1,750
Thereafter	$	85,601

8. Sale of Office Facility

          In March 2007, we sold a 15,000 square foot office facility in the United Kingdom for approximately $6.3 million and recognized a gain of $4.1 million.

9. Earnings per Share

          The Company has two classes of outstanding capital stock, Common Stock and Series B Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock is a participating security, such that in the event a dividend is declared or paid on the common stock, the Company must simultaneously declare and pay a dividend on the Series B Preferred Stock as if the Series B Preferred Stock had been converted into common stock. According to the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-06, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share, companies having participating securities are required to apply the two-class method to compute basic earnings per share. Under the two-class computation method, basic earnings per share is calculated for each class of stock and participating security considering both dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings as if all such earnings had been distributed during the period.

          The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for first quarter 2008 and 2007 includes the assumed conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock into common stock as of the beginning of the period. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options is included in the diluted earnings per share calculations for first quarter 2008 and 2007 using the treasury stock method. The diluted earnings per share calculations for first quarter 2008 and 2007 exclude approximately 646,000 and 1.4 million, respectively, of vested options for the purchase of common stock that have exercise prices in excess of the average market price and as a result would be anti-dilutive. In addition, the diluted earnings per share calculations for first quarter 2008 and 2007 exclude 259,516 contingently issuable performance share awards and 502,935 contingently issuable restricted stock units, respectively for which all necessary conditions had not been met (see Note 10). Earnings per share for first quarter 2008 and 2007 are calculated as follows:

	Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Net income and undistributed earnings	$	5,356	$	5,416
Allocation of undistributed earnings:
Common Stock		4,787		4,826
Series B Preferred Stock		569		590
	$	5,356	$	5,416
Weighted Average Shares:
Common Stock		30,320		29,465
Series B Preferred Stock		3,604		3,604
Shares — Basic earnings per share		33,924		33,069
Dilutive common stock equivalents		1,161		494
Shares — Diluted earnings per share		35,085		33,563
Basic earnings per share applicable to common shareholders:
Common Stock	$	.16	$	.16
Series B Preferred Stock	$	.16	$	.16
Diluted earnings per share applicable to common shareholders	$	.15	$	.16

12

10. Stock-Based Compensation

          Restricted Stock Units. Our Board of Directors approved a special Manugistics Incentive Plan (“Integration Plan”) on August 18, 2006. The Integration Plan provided for the issuance of contingently issuable restricted stock units under the 2005 Incentive Plan to executive officers and certain other members of our management team if we were able to successfully integrate the Manugistics acquisition and achieve a defined performance threshold goal in 2007. The performance threshold goal was defined as $85 million of adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), which excludes certain non-routine items. A partial pro-rata issuance of restricted stock units would be made if we achieved a minimum performance threshold. The Board approved additional contingently issuable restricted stock units under the Integration Plan for executive officers and new participants in 2007. The Company’s actual EBITDA performance for 2007 was approved by the Board in January 2008 and qualified participants for a pro-rata issuance equal to 99.25% of the contingently issuable restricted stock units. In total, 502,935 restricted stock units were issued on January 28, 2008 with a grant date fair value of $8.1 million. The restricted stock units vested 50% upon the date of issuance with the remaining 50% vesting ratably over the subsequent 24-month period.

          A deferred compensation charge of $8.1 million was recorded in the equity section of our balance sheet during 2007, with a related increase to additional paid-in capital, for the total grant date fair value of the awards. Stock-based compensation is being recognized on a graded vesting basis over the requisite service periods that run from the date of the various board approvals through January 2010. We recognized $5.4 million in stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock unit awards in 2007, including $778,000 in first quarter 2007, plus an additional $332,000 in first quarter 2008. These charges are reflected in the consolidated statements of income under the captions “Cost of maintenance services,” “Cost of consulting services,” “Product development,” “Sales and marketing,” and “General and administrative.”

          Performance Share Awards. On February 7, 2008, the Board approved an incentive plan for 2008 similar to the Integration Plan (“New Incentive Plan”). The New Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of contingently issuable performance share awards under the 2005 Incentive Plan to executive officers and certain other members of our management team if we are able to achieve a defined performance threshold goal in 2008. The performance threshold goal is defined as $95 million of adjusted EBITDA, which excludes certain non-routine items. A partial pro-rata issuance of performance share awards will be made if we achieve a minimum performance threshold. The New Incentive Plan initially provides for up to 259,516 contingently issuable performance share awards. The performance share awards, if any, will be issued after the approval of our 2008 financial results in January 2009 and will vest 50% upon the date of issuance with the remaining 50% vesting ratably over a 24-month period.

          The Company’s performance against the defined performance threshold goal of the New Incentive Plan will be evaluated on a quarterly basis throughout 2008 and stock-based compensation recognized over the requisite service period that runs from the date of board approval through January 2011. A deferred compensation charge of $4.2 million was recorded in the equity section of our balance sheet in first quarter 2008, with a related increase to additional paid-in capital, for the total grant date fair value of the awards. Although all necessary service and performance conditions have not been met through March 31, 2008, based on first quarter 2008 results and the outlook for the remainder of 2008, management has determined that it is probable that the performance condition will ultimately be met. As a result, we recorded $703,000 in stock-based compensation expense related to these awards in first quarter 2008 on a graded vesting basis. This charge is reflected in the consolidated statements of income under the captions “Cost of maintenance services,” “Cost of consulting services,” “Product development,” “Sales and marketing,” and “General and administrative.” If we achieve the defined performance threshold goal we would expect to recognize approximately $2.8 million of the award as stock-based compensation in 2008.

          During first quarter 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $147,000 and $110,000, respectively related to other 2005 Incentive Plan awards.

11. Income Taxes

          We calculate income taxes on an interim basis using the year-to-date effective tax rate and record discrete tax adjustments in the reporting period in which they occur. Because the Company is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions and the timing of software and consulting income by jurisdiction can vary significantly, we are unable to reliably estimate an overall annual effective tax rate. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 18, "Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods — an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 28,” we calculate our tax provision on an interim basis using the year-to-date effective tax rate and record discrete tax adjustments in the reporting period in which they occur. A summary of the income tax provision recorded in first quarter 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

13

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
Income before income tax provision	$	8,660		$	7,761
Effective tax rate		37	%		30	%
Income tax provision at effective tax rate		3,200			2,293
Discrete tax item benefits:
Interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions		108			115
Changes in estimate and foreign statutory rates		(4	)		(63	)
Total discrete tax item benefits		104			52
Income tax provision	$	3,304		$	2,345

          We exercise significant judgment in determining our income tax provision due to transactions, credits and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Uncertainties arise as a consequence of the actual source of taxable income between domestic and foreign locations, the outcome of tax audits and the ultimate utilization of tax credits. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the final tax determination could differ from our recorded income tax provision and accruals. In such case, we would adjust the income tax provision in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. These adjustments could have a material impact on our income tax provision and our net income for that period.

          The income tax provision recorded in first quarter 2008 and 2007 takes into account the source of taxable income, domestically by state and internationally by country, and available income tax credits, and does not include the tax benefits realized from the employee stock options exercised during first quarter 2008 and 2007 of $5,000 and $92,000, respectively. These tax benefits reduce our income tax liabilities and are included as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

          The effective tax rate in first quarter 2008 is higher than the effective tax rate in first quarter 2007 primarily due to the mix of revenue by jurisdiction being weighted more toward the United States which has a higher effective tax rate.

          We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 was $3.5 million, of which $799,000 would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. With the adoption of FIN 48, we recognized a charge of approximately $1.0 million to beginning retained earnings for uncertain tax positions. In addition, a FIN 48 adjustment of $2.9 million was made to the purchase price allocation on the Manugistics acquisition to record a tax liability for uncertain tax positions which increased the goodwill balance. Other than the settlement of a tax audit in Germany, which could result in a decrease of approximately $800,000 in the FIN 48 tax liability in 2008, we do not believe there are any uncertain tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.

          To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to the uncertain tax positions, the accrued amounts for interest and penalties will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall tax provision. We accrued additional interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of $108,000 and $115,000 in first quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively which are included as a component of income tax expense.

          We conduct business globally and, as a result, JDA Software Group, Inc. or one or more of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business we are subjected to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including material countries such as Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the U.K. and the United States. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2002. The Internal Revenue Service has completed their examination of the 2003 and 2004 tax years without any material adjustments. We are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2006 tax year. We expect the examination phase of this audit to be completed in 2008 and we do not anticipate any material adjustments. We are under examination in Canada for tax years 2003 and 2004. We do not anticipate material adjustments from either of these audits.

          JDA Software Group, Inc. has accepted an invitation to participate in the Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”) beginning in 2007. The CAP program was developed by the Internal Revenue Service to allow for transparency and to remove uncertainties in tax compliance. The CAP program is offered by invitation only to those companies with both a history of immaterial audit adjustments and a high level of tax complexity and will involve a review of each quarterly tax provision. Our participation in the

14

CAP program has commenced and the Internal Revenue Service has completed their review of our first, second and third quarter 2007 tax provisions. No material adjustments have been made as a result of these reviews.

12. Business Segments and Geographic Data

          We are a leading provider of sophisticated software solutions designed specifically to address the supply and demand chain requirements of global consumer products companies, manufacturers, wholesale/distributors and retailers, and have an install base of over 5,600 customers worldwide. Our solutions enable customers to manage and optimize the coordination of supply, demand and flows of inventory throughout the demand chain to the consumer. We conduct business in three geographic regions that have separate management teams and reporting structures: the Americas (United States, Canada and Latin America), Europe (Europe, Middle East and Africa), and Asia/Pacific. Similar products and services are offered in each geographic region and local management is evaluated primarily based on total revenues and operating income. Identifiable assets are also managed by geographical region. The geographic distribution of our revenues and identifiable assets is as follows:

	Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Revenues:
Americas	$	62,849	$	60,886
Europe		22,424		21,331
Asia/Pacific		8,602		8,500
Total revenues	$	93,875	$	90,717

	March 31,		December 31,
	2008		2007
Identifiable assets:
Americas	$	480,060	$	470,205
Europe		112,605		108,390
Asia/Pacific		47,320		43,630
Total identifiable assets	$	639,985	$	622,225

          Revenues in the Americas for first quarter 2008 and 2007 include $56.2 million and $55.1 million from the United States, respectively. Identifiable assets for the Americas include $453.1 million and $446.3 million in the United States as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

     We organize and manage our operations by type of customer across the following reportable business segments:

• Retail. This reportable business segment includes all revenues related to applications sold to retail customers.

• Manufacturing and Distribution. This reportable business segment includes all revenues related to applications sold to manufacturing and distribution companies, including consumer goods manufacturers, life sciences companies, high tech organizations, oil and gas companies, automotive producers and other discrete manufacturers involved with government, aerospace and defense contracts.

• Services Industries. This reportable business segment includes all revenues related to applications sold to customers in service industries such as travel, transportation, hospitality, media and telecommunications. The Services Industries segment is centrally managed by a team that has global responsibilities for this market.

15

          A summary of the revenues, operating income (loss) and depreciation attributable to each of these reportable business segments for first quarter 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

	Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	2008			2007
Revenues:
Retail	$	49,225		$	48,617
Manufacturing and Distribution		39,573			38,686
Services Industries		5,077			3,414
	$	93,875		$	90,717
Operating income (loss):
Retail	$	13,019		$	10,224
Manufacturing and Distribution		14,682			15,497
Services Industries		576			(724	)
Other (see below)		(18,432	)		(14,455	)
	$	9,845		$	10,542
Depreciation:
Retail	$	1,120		$	1,122
Manufacturing and Distribution		901			893
Services Industries		116			79
	$	2,137		$	2,094
Other:
General and administrative expenses	$	11,600		$	10,288
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			288
Amortization of intangible assets		6,076			3,963
Restructuring charge		756			4,044
Gain on sale of office facility		—			(4,128	)
	$	18,432		$	14,455

          Operating income in the Retail, Manufacturing and Distribution and Services Industry reportable business segments includes direct expenses for software licenses, maintenance services, service revenues, product development expenses and losses on impairment of trademarks and goodwill as well as allocations for sales and marketing expenses, occupancy costs, depreciation expense and amortization of acquired software technology. The “Other” caption includes general and administrative expenses and other charges that are not directly identified with a particular reportable business segment and which management does not consider in evaluating the operating income (loss) of the reportable business segment.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Significant Trends and Developments in Our Business

          Outlook for Second Quarter 2008. We believe software license sales will continue to be strong in second quarter 2008 based upon our review of our sales pipeline. We also expect our maintenance renewal trends to remain steady. We continue to struggle, however, with the performance of our consulting services business.

          The consulting services business continues to be impacted by low rate competition, fixed price engagements and by our product mix, which for several years has favored solutions that require less implementation services. We have also begun to see an increased interest and involvement by large systems integrators and small specialist consulting firms on some of our projects, particularly in North America, which has resulted in a dilution of the consulting revenues that we receive from these projects. Furthermore, we are seeing an increase in the length of time between the execution of a software license and the actual commencement of the related implementation project. As a result, the timing of consulting services revenues on new projects has and may continue to be delayed for one or more quarters after a software license has been signed.

          We are revamping the market strategy and approach for our consulting services business, including the reorganization of our senior practice teams in North America in order to ensure greater continuity and effectiveness in our processes, from services proposal through to final project execution. We have also introduced an Innovator Adopter Program that is designed to provide enhanced focus, support and services from our product development, customer support and consulting services groups to assist early adopters to implement and gain maximum value from new products. We currently expect a modest sequential increase in consulting services revenue in second quarter 2008 as well as an increase in service costs due to our investment in the Center of Excellence (“CoE”). We believe our consulting services business will be positively impacted by our improved software sales performance in fourth quarter 2007 and first quarter 2008, particularly in North America. We also believe the consulting services business will be positively

16

impacted by our CoE initiative, although we cannot predict when we will feel the full benefits of the CoE. We are on track with our recruiting and training and have already begun cycling implementation projects through the CoE, successfully completing several projects in the Americas and European regions during first quarter 2008. We have a healthy pipeline of future projects from all regions for the CoE that should result in increased volume of work through the CoE, particularly in the second half of 2008.

          We believe it is too early to conclude that our positive first quarter 2008 operating results represent a trend for the remainder of 2008. It is normal for our business to experience quarterly fluctuations and software revenues will continue to be subject to normal quarter-to-quarter variability. Although we continue to see some software deals being delayed, this slippage is being offset by the increased number of opportunities in our sales pipeline. We believe our sales pipeline is as strong entering second quarter 2008 as it was entering fourth quarter 2007, and includes both large transactions ³ $1.0 million and mid-size software sales opportunities in the $300,000 to $700,000 range. We are comfortable with our current operating model, and with our ability to achieve our profitability goals for the remainder of 2008, subject to continued revenue performance. Further, we do not currently anticipate any major adjustments to our overall cost structure throughout the balance of the year, other than the previously announced expansion of our operations in India and the creation of the CoE. As a result, we do not believe there is any compelling reason to change our annual guidance for 2008 at this time, nor do we plan to provide quarter-to-quarter guidance. The following summarizes our previously announced annual guidance for 2008, which includes ranges for software revenues, total revenues and GAAP earnings per share that we believe are realistic and achievable:

	2008 Annual Guidance
	Low End		High End
Software revenues	$75 million		$85 million
Total revenues	$382 million		$395 million
GAAP earnings per share	$	0.76	$	0.78

          Our Plans do not Contemplate Significant Economic Impact on our Software Sales. Despite uncertainties in the economy, we remain cautiously optimistic about our prospects for second quarter and the remainder of 2008 due to our recent strong sales performance. Software sales will continue to be the leading indicator for our business. We have identified only a small number of transactions during 2007 and first quarter 2008 that appear to have been impacted by the economy and that resulted in either a reduction in the scope of the license or in the indefinite delay of a planned project. We do not currently see any clear evidence that our prospects have or will change dramatically; however, there is inherent uncertainty in our sales pipeline and due to the nature of our sales cycle we have limited ability to fully anticipate actual quarterly results. We do believe that as companies consider the economic uncertainty of the future and the potential for flat or declining sales, they may seek more efficiency in existing business assets and we believe this scenario could favor our products and offerings.

          We Are Making an Incremental Investment to Expand our Operations in India in 2008 and Create a Center of Excellence. We acquired our first off-shore development facility in Hyderabad, India in the Manugistics acquisition. This operation employed approximately 200 associates and was primarily focused on product development. Since the acquisition, we have taken time to more fully understand the risks and benefits of this business model before making any significant changes. In particular, we were initially concerned about associate attrition, which at the time of acquisition was running over 25%. Eighteen months later we have successfully delivered our first major product release through the India facility and have reduced associate attrition to approximately 13.5%. With this experience behind us, we have begun to implement changes that we believe will fundamentally improve our competitiveness and profitability. These changes include a $7.8 million incremental cost to expand our operations in India in 2008 and the creation of a comprehensive CoE that encompasses additional product development activities, customer implementation services, customer support services and internal administrative services. The costs are primarily related to the addition of approximately 230 new associates at our Hyderabad, India facility, approximately half of which we hope to hire during the first half of 2008. These costs will not be offset by on-shore reductions until sometime in second half 2008. Through first quarter 2008, we believe our plans for developing the CoE are on track. We have been able to find resources with the necessary skill sets and our training programs are underway. We added 60 FTE at the CoE during first quarter 2008.

          We believe the CoE will provide an improved business model for JDA and enhance our growth potential and operating results by:

Ø	Accelerating the development of new solutions and innovations through expanded R&D bandwidth;
Ø	Increasing the breadth and competitiveness of our consulting services through a blended delivery offering that combines high value on-shore consulting expertise and project management with lower cost off-shore resources;

17

Ø	Enhancing our customer support service through faster resolution of complex customer issues;
Ø	Accelerating the development of training content;
Ø	Reducing the total cost of ownership of our solutions;
Ø	Improving our competitiveness against companies that already operate low cost off-shore facilities, and against small, low-cost on-shore service providers;
Ø	Accelerating the development of common business processes between major departments within JDA;
Ø	Increasing our ability to take advantage of technology to optimize our internal operations; and
Ø	Lowering our operating costs and improving our operating margins.

          The CoE is designed to complement and enhance our existing on-shore business model, not replace it, and our goal is to achieve all of these benefits without sacrificing our capability to work face-to-face with our customers, most of which are in the Americas and Europe. We do plan to reduce our total on-shore headcount by approximately 50 associates during 2008 through attrition and minor adjustments as related functions become available at the CoE. From an overall financial perspective, we believe the CoE will result in a net cost to JDA during 2008 as duplicate resources will be retained on-shore during the period of time we hire and train the new Indian associates in order to ensure a smooth transition. We believe the CoE will improve our operating margins from 2009 forward.

          We Expect our Total costs and Expenses to Increase in 2008. We expect our total costs and expenses, excluding amortization of intangibles and restructuring charges, to increase between 2% and 5% in 2008 compared to 2007. This increase primarily includes incremental expense in our services and product development functions as associates are added in India during the transition to the CoE. We also plan modest increases in our overall investment in sales and marketing in 2008. We expect to incur restructuring charges of $1.0 million to $1.3 million for termination of redundant headcount and closure of office facilities in first half 2008, which includes the restructuring charge of $794,000 taken in first quarter 2008.

          We Will Continue to Actively Look for Strategic Acquisition Opportunities in 2008. We have substantially completed the integration of the sales, customer support, consulting services and administrative functions from the Manugistics acquisition, and have made significant progress in our plans for the integration of our combined solution suite and operating platform. As a result, we believe we are now ready to undertake another acquisition, and are actively looking for strategic acquisition opportunities in 2008.

          Summary of First Quarter 2008 Results. Software license sales increased $3.0 million or 18% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 primarily due to a strong performance in our Americas region. We believe our competitive position remains strong, and we continue to maintain consistent competitive win rates in our markets. Software sales to new customers increased $561,000 or 9% to $6.5 million in first quarter 2008 compared to $5.9 million in first quarter 2007, and represented 32% and 35% of total software sales, respectively. We continue to have strong back-selling opportunities as sales to our install-base customers increased $2.4 million or 22% in first quarter 2008, compared to first quarter 2007. Our trailing twelve month average selling price increased $100,000 per deal or 34% to $392,000 in the 12-month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to $292,000 in the 12-month period ended March 31, 2007.

          We believe the market now recognizes that we are a specialized, domain-focused company with the financial strength, products and ability to invest that positions us to be a long-term contender in the market and compete successfully against large horizontal enterprise application companies in larger head-to-head sales opportunities, particularly those involving our supply chain planning and optimization solutions. Additionally, our leadership in planning and optimization solutions often creates opportunities for us to enhance existing ERP installations, significantly reducing direct competition from these large companies. We have closed ten large transactions ≥$1.0 million in the past six months, which is as many large transactions ≥$1.0 million as we closed in the prior 18 months.

18

          The following tables summarize software license revenue by region for first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007:

Software License Revenues

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Region	2008		2007		$ Change			% Change
Americas	$	13,241	$	9,637	$	3,604			37	%
Europe		4,711		5,430		(719	)		(13	%)
Asia/Pacific		2,084		1,961		123			6	%
Total	$	20,036	$	17,028	$	3,008			18	%

          Software sales performance in the Americas region in first quarter 2008 and during 2007, and in particular the United States, continues to reflect the positive impact of the organizational changes that were made to the regional sales management team during the second half of 2006. These changes significantly increased our business development efforts and improved the sales force execution and sales performance in the region. We have a solid pipeline of sales opportunities in the Americas that includes both mid-size software deals and larger transactions ≥$1.0 million. The Americas is our largest region and, as a result, we believe the software sales performance in the region will continue to be a key driver of our overall success.

          Software sales performance in the European region decreased in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. Although this was not a strong quarter for the European region, we have not identified any fundamental changes or underlying trends in this region. We have a stable sales organization in place in the region, the accuracy of the software forecast has been similar or better than our other regions over the past years and we continue to focus on business development activities in order to expand the quality and number of opportunities in the European sales pipeline. We continue to experience large fluctuations in quarterly software sales performance in the Asia/Pacific region but we believe that through improved focus on sales execution we can improve the performance of this region. We are introducing new sales management into the Asia/Pacific region and we believe these changes will help drive positive change.

          Maintenance services revenues increased $1.3 million or 3% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 and represented 49% of total revenues in each of these periods. Favorable foreign exchange rate variances provided a $1.1 million benefit to maintenance services revenues in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 due to further weakening of the US dollar against substantially all foreign currencies in which we do business. Excluding the impact of the favorable foreign exchange rate variance, maintenance services revenues increased less than 1% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 as new maintenance revenues related to new software sales, rate increases on annual renewals and reinstatements of previously cancelled maintenance agreements were substantially offset by a decrease in recurring maintenance revenues due to attrition. The retention rate in our maintenance revenue install-base was approximately 94% in the 12-month period ended March 31, 2008. We believe our large annual recurring maintenance revenue base provides significant stability and enhances our ability to maintain profitable operations.

          Maintenance services gross profits were $34.6 million and $33.4 million in first quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively, and represented 76% and 75% of maintenance service revenues in these quarters, respectively. The increase in margin dollars is due primarily to the $1.3 million increase in maintenance revenues and a $257,000 decrease in fees and royalties paid to 3^rd parties who provide first level support to certain of our customers, offset in part by an increase in costs resulting from a 2% increase in average headcount in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. We expect maintenance services margins to continue to range between 74% and 76% throughout 2008. As of March 31, 2008 we had 284 employees in our customer support function compared to 265 at December 31, 2007 and 271 at March 31, 2007.

          Service revenues, which include consulting services, hosting services and training revenues, net revenues from our hardware reseller business and reimbursed expenses, decreased $1.2 million or 4% to $28.0 million in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. The decrease is due primarily to low rate competition, fixed price engagements and by our product mix which for several years has favored solutions that require less implementation services. Our global utilization rate was 59% in first quarter 2008 compared to 53% in first quarter 2007 and our average blended global billing rates were $189 and $187 per hour, respectively in these periods.

          Service gross profit dollars increased $489,000 to $6.0 million in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. The increase in service margin dollars is due primarily to reduced service costs resulting from a 15% decrease in average headcount, primarily as a result of the workforce reduction in our worldwide consulting group during second quarter 2007, and an $825,000 decrease in outside contractor costs on consulting projects in the United States, offset in part by the $1.2 million decrease in service

19

revenues. Service margins as a percentage of service revenues were 21% in first quarter 2008 and 19% in first quarter 2007. Service margins will be impacted during 2008 by the temporary duplicate investment in consulting resources that will occur as we hire and train new associates in service-related functions at the CoE. We will continue our plan to aggressively hire associates for the CoE during second quarter 2008, and would expect the duplicate investment to decline later in the year. We currently anticipate that our service margins will remain in the low to mid 20% range throughout 2008 as we transition to the CoE. As of March 31, 2008 we had 434 employees in the services organization compared to 429 at December 31, 2007 and 498 at March 31, 2007.

          Product development expense was $13.7 million in first quarter 2008 which is flat compared to first quarter 2007. Although average headcount in our product development function increased 7% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007, salaries and related benefits decreased $252,000 as new and replacement positions were filled with lower cost resources, including those added at the CoE operation in India. In addition, outside contractor costs decreased $268,000 in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. These decreases were substantially offset by a $253,000 decrease in capitalized costs for ongoing funded development efforts and an increase in travel costs. We are expecting a modest sequential increase in product development expense in second quarter 2008 due to the temporary duplicate investment in product development resources that will occur as we hire and train new associates in development-related functions at the CoE. We will continue our plan to aggressively hire associates for the CoE during second quarter 2008, and would expect the duplicate investment to decline later in the year. As of March 31, 2008 we had 478 employees in our product development function compared to 462 at December 31, 2007 and 414 at March 31, 2007.

          Sales and marketing expense increased $1.3 million or 9% to $16.1 million in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. The increase is due primarily to a $580,000 increase in commissions resulting from the 18% increase in software license sales, a 5% increase in average sales and marketing headcount and a $432,000 increase in marketing-related activities including costs for trade shows, public relations and industry analyst fees. As of March 31, 2008 we had 221 employees in sales and marketing function compared to 222 at December 31, 2007 and 213 at March 31, 2007, including quota carrying sales associates of 67, 68 and 64, respectively. We expect only a small increase in our in sales and marketing headcount in second quarter 2008; however, sales and marketing expense will continue to fluctuate quarterly with software license performance.

          General and administrative expense increased $1.3 million or 13% to $11.6 million in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. The increase is due primarily to a 10% increase in average headcount, which resulted in higher salaries and related benefits, a $420,000 increase in incentive compensation due to the Company’s improved operating performance, including $234,000 in stock-based compensation and a $352,000 increase in accounting fees primarily for tax-related services. We expect general and administrative expense to decline about $800,000 sequentially in second quarter 2008 due to certain non-recurring costs and the timing of certain projects. As of March 31, 2008 we had 226 employees in general and administrative functions compared to 218 at December 31, 2007 and 203 at March 31, 2007.

          Amortization of intangibles increased $2.1 million in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 due primarily to a change in the estimated useful life of certain customer lists to reflect current trends in attrition. With this change, the quarterly amortization expense on customer lists increased approximately $2.1 million per quarter, beginning first quarter 2008 and continuing over the remaining useful life of the related customer lists which extend through June 2014. This change had a $0.04 per share impact (reduction) on first quarter 2008 basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

          We recorded a restructuring charge of $794,000 in first quarter 2008 that included $722,000 in termination benefits, primarily related to a workforce reduction of 13 consulting and sales-related positions in the United States and the European region, and $72,000 for office closure and integration costs of redundant office facilities.

          Performance Share Awards. On February 7, 2008, the Board approved an incentive plan for 2008 similar to the Integration Plan (“New Incentive Plan”). The New Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of contingently issuable performance share awards under the 2005 Incentive Plan to executive officers and certain other members of our management team if we are able to achieve a defined performance threshold goal in 2008. The performance threshold goal is defined as $95 million of adjusted EBITDA which excludes certain non-routine items. A partial pro-rata issuance of performance share awards will be made if we achieve a minimum performance threshold. The New Incentive Plan initially provides for up to 259,516 contingently issuable performance share awards. The performance share awards, if any, will be issued after the approval of our 2008 financial results in January 2009 and will vest 50% upon the date of issuance with the remaining 50% vesting ratably over a 24-month period.

          The Company’s performance against the defined performance threshold goal of the New Incentive Plan will be evaluated on a quarterly basis throughout 2008 and stock-based compensation recognized over the requisite service period that runs from the date of board approval through January 2011. A deferred compensation charge of $4.2 million was recorded in the equity section of our balance sheet in first quarter 2008, with a related increase to additional paid-in capital, for the total grant date fair value of the awards.

20

Although all necessary service and performance conditions have not been met through March 31, 2008, based on first quarter 2008 results and the outlook for the remainder of 2008, management has determined that it is probable that the performance condition will ultimately be met. As a result, we recorded $703,000 in stock-based compensation expense related to these awards in first quarter 2008 on a graded vesting basis. This charge is reflected in the consolidated statements of income under the captions “Cost of maintenance services,” “Cost of consulting services,” “Product development,” “Sales and marketing,” and “General and administrative.” If we achieve the defined performance threshold goal we would expect to recognize approximately $2.8 million of the award as stock-based compensation in 2008.

          Restricted Stock Units. Our Board of Directors approved a special Manugistics Incentive Plan (“Integration Plan”) on August 18, 2006. The Integration Plan provided for the issuance of contingently issuable restricted stock units under the 2005 Incentive Plan to executive officers and certain other members of our management team if we were able to successfully integrate the Manugistics acquisition and achieve a defined performance threshold goal in 2007. The performance threshold goal was defined as $85 million of adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), which excludes certain non-routine items. A partial pro-rata issuance of restricted stock units would be made if we achieved a minimum performance threshold. The Board approved additional contingently issuable restricted stock units under the Integration Plan for executive officers and new participants in 2007. The Company’s actual EBITDA performance for 2007 was approved by the Board in January 2008 and qualified participants for a pro-rata issuance equal to 99.25% of the contingently issuable restricted stock units. In total, 502,935 restricted stock units were issued on January 28, 2008 with a grant date fair value of $8.1 million. The restricted stock units vested 50% upon the date of issuance with the remaining 50% vesting ratably over the subsequent 24-month period.

          A deferred compensation charge of $8.1 million was recorded in the equity section of our balance sheet during 2007, with a related increase to additional paid-in capital, for the total grant date fair value of the awards. Stock-based compensation is being recognized on a graded vesting basis over the requisite service periods that run from the date of the various board approvals through January 2010. We recognized $5.4 million in stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock unit awards in 2007, including $778,000 in first quarter 2007, plus an additional $332,000 in first quarter 2008. These charges are reflected in the consolidated statements of income under the captions “Cost of maintenance services,” “Cost of consulting services,” “Product development,” “Sales and marketing,” and “General and administrative.”

          During first quarter 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $147,000 and $110,000, respectively related to other 2005 Incentive Plan awards.

          A summary of total stock-based compensation by expense category for first quarter 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

	Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	2008		2007
Cost of maintenance services	$	87	$	78
Cost of consulting services		151		105
Product development		134		101
Sales and marketing		315		340
General and administrative		495		264
Total stock-based compensation	$	1,182	$	888

          On February 7, 2008, the Board of Directors approved a 2008 cash incentive bonus plan (“Incentive Plan”) for our executive officers. The Incentive Plan provides for $2.9 million in targeted cash bonuses based upon defined annualized operational performance goals. A partial pro-rata cash bonus will be paid if we achieve a minimum annualized performance threshold. There is no cap on the maximum amount the executives can receive if the Company exceeds the defined annualized operational and software performance goals.

          Our Financial Position is Solid and We Are Generating Positive Cash Flow From Operations. We had working capital of $79.2 million at March 31, 2008 compared to $67.9 million at December 31, 2007. The working capital balances at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include $109.7 million and $95.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, respectively. We generated $23.1 million in cash flow from operations in first quarter 2008 compared to $18.4 million in first quarter 2007. Net accounts receivable were $82.5 million or 79 DSO at March 31, 2008 compared to $74.7 million or 68 DSO at December 31, 2007. During first quarter 2008 we paid $1.4 million of direct costs related to the Manugistics acquisition, spent $2.2 million on capital expenditures and repaid $5.6 million of our long-term debt including a scheduled quarterly installment of $437,500 plus an additional $5.2 million mandatory repayment based on a percentage of our annual excess cash flow, as defined in the agreement.

21

          We expect cash flow from operations to be positive in second quarter 2008. We also believe our cash position is sufficient to meet our operating needs for the foreseeable future.

Results of Operations

          The following table sets forth certain selected financial information expressed as a percentage of total revenues for first quarter 2008 and 2007 and certain gross margin data expressed as a percentage of software license revenue, maintenance services revenue, product revenues or services revenues, as appropriate:

	Three months
	Ended March 31,
	2008			2007
REVENUES:
Software licenses		21	%		19	%
Maintenance services		49			49
Product revenues		70			68
Consulting services		28			29
Reimbursed expenses		2			3
Service revenues		30			32
Total revenues		100			100
COST OF REVENUES:
Cost of software licenses		1			1
Amortization of acquired software technology		2			2
Cost of maintenance services		12			12
Cost of product revenues		15			15
Cost of consulting services		21			23
Reimbursed expenses		2			3
Cost of service revenues		23			26
Total cost of revenues		38			41
GROSS PROFIT		62			59
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Product development		15			15
Sales and marketing		17			16
General and administrative		12			12
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			—
Amortization of intangibles		6			4
Restructuring charges and adjustments to acquisition-related reserves		1			4
Gain on sale of office facility		—			(4	)
Total operating expenses		51			47
OPERATING INCOME		11			12
Interest expense and amortization of loan fees		(3	)		(4	)
Other income and other, net		1			1
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISON		9			9
Income tax provision		3			3
NET INCOME		6	%		6	%
Gross margin on software licenses		95	%		97	%
Gross margin on maintenance services		76	%		75	%
Gross margin on product revenues		79	%		78	%
Gross margin on service revenues		21	%		19	%

22

          The following table sets forth a comparison of selected financial information, expressed as a percentage change between periods for first quarter 2008 and 2007. In addition, the table sets forth cost of revenues and product development expenses expressed as a percentage of the related revenues:

	% Change
	Three Months ended March 31,
	2008			2007 to 2008			2007
Revenues:
Software licenses	$	20,036			18	%	$	17,028
Maintenance		45,812			3	%		44,478
Product revenues		65,848			7	%		61,506
Service revenues		28,027			(4	%)		29,211
Total revenues		93,875			3	%		90,717
Cost of Revenues:
Software licenses		1,053			126	%		465
Amortization of acquired software technology		1,501			(20	%)		1,871
Maintenance services		11,196			1	%		11,053
Product revenues		13,750			3	%		13,389
Service revenues		22,063			(7	%)		23,736
Total cost of revenues		35,813			(4	%)		37,125
Gross Profit		58,062			8	%		53,592
Operating Expenses:
Product development		13,676			(1	%)		13,787
Sales and marketing		16,109			9	%		14,808
General and administrative		11,600			13	%		10,288
		41,385			6	%		38,883
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			(100	%)		288
Amortization of intangibles		6,076			53	%		3,963
Restructuring charge		756			(81	%)		4,044
Gain on sale of office facility		—			(100	%)		(4,128	)
Operating income	$	9,845			(7	%)	$	10,542
Cost of Revenues as a % of related revenues:
Software licenses		5	%					3	%
Maintenance services		24	%					25	%
Product revenues		21	%					22	%
Service revenues		79	%					81	%
Product Development as a % of product revenues		21	%					22	%

23

          The following tables set forth selected comparative financial information on revenues in our business segments and geographical regions, expressed as a percentage change between first quarter 2008 and 2007. In addition, the tables set forth the contribution of each business segment and geographical region to total revenues in first quarter 2008 and 2007, expressed as a percentage of total revenues:

Business Segments

				Manufacturing			Services
	Retail			& Distribution			Industries
	2008 vs 2007			2008 vs 2007			2008 vs 2007
Software licenses		8	%		21	%		113	%
Maintenance services		9	%		(2	%)		10	%
Product revenues		9	%		2	%		57	%
Service revenues		(11	%)		3	%		37	%
Total revenues		1	%		2	%		49	%
Product development		(6	%)		(2	%)		56	%
Sales and marketing		(4	%)		28	%		61	%
Operating income		27	%		(5	%)		180	%

							Manufacturing						Services
	Retail						& Distribution						Industries
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
Contribution to total revenues		53	%		53	%		42	%		43	%		5	%		4	%

Geographical Regions

	The Americas			Europe			Asia/Pacific
	2008 vs 2007			2008 vs 2007			2007 vs 2006
Software licenses		37	%		(13	%)		6	%
Maintenance services		1	%		8	%		4	%
Product revenues		10	%		1	%		5	%
Service revenues		(9	%)		20	%		(5	%)
Total revenues		3	%		5	%		1	%

	The Americas						Europe						Asia/Pacific
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
Contribution to total revenues		67	%		67	%		24	%		24	%		9	%		9	%

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007

Product Revenues

          Software Licenses.

          Retail. Software license revenues in this reportable business segment increased 8% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007, primarily due to an increased number of large transactions ³ $1.0 million (“large transactions”). In total there were four large transactions in this reportable business segment in first quarter 2008 compared to one in first quarter 2007.

24

          Manufacturing & Distribution. Software license revenues in this reportable business segment increased 21% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007, primarily due to an increase in follow-on sales to existing customers for new product or to expand the scope of an existing license. There were no large transactions in this reportable business segment in first quarter 2008 or 2007.

          Services Industries. Software license revenues in this reportable business segment increased 113% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007, primarily due a large transaction with an existing customer. There were no large transactions in this reportable business segment in first quarter 2007.

          Regional Results. Software license revenues in the Americas region increased 37% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 due to our business development efforts and the continued improvement in our overall sales execution, particularly in the United States. There were three large transactions in the Americas region in first quarter 2008 compared to none in first quarter 2007.

          Software license revenues in the European region decreased 13% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 due to a decrease in mid-size software license sales to new customers. There was one large transaction in the European region in both first quarter 2008 and 2007.

          Software license revenues in the Asia/Pacific region increased 6% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 due to a large transaction. There were no large transactions in the Asia/Pacific region in first quarter 2007.

          Maintenance Services. Maintenance services revenues increased $1.3 million or 3% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 and represented 49% of total revenues in each of these periods. Favorable foreign exchange rate variances provided a $1.1 million benefit to maintenance services revenues in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 due to further weakening of the US dollar against substantially all foreign currencies in which we do business. Excluding the impact of the favorable foreign exchange rate variance, maintenance services revenues increased less than 1% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 as new maintenance revenues related to new software sales, rate increases on annual renewals and reinstatements of previously cancelled maintenance agreements, were substantially offset by a decrease in recurring maintenance revenues due to normal attrition.

Service Revenues

          Service revenues decreased $1.2 million or 4% to $28.0 million in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. The decrease is due primarily to low rate competition, fixed price engagements and by our product mix which for several years has favored solutions that require less implementation services..

          Fixed bid consulting services work represented 17% of total consulting services revenue in first quarter 2008 compared to 16% in first quarter 2007.

Cost of Product Revenues

          Cost of Software Licenses. The increase in cost of software licenses in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 resulted primarily from a higher mix of licenses sold with products that include embedded 3^rd party software applications and/or require payment of higher royalty fee obligations.

          Amortization of Acquired Software Technology. The decrease in amortization of acquired software technology in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 resulted primarily from a decrease in amortization on software technology related to the Intactix suite of products that has now been fully amortized.

          Cost of Maintenance Services. The cost of maintenance services was flat in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 as a $257,000 decrease in fees and royalties paid to 3^rd parties who provide first level support to certain of our customers was substantially offset by an increase in costs resulting from a 2% increase in average headcount.

Cost of Service Revenues

          The decrease in cost of service revenues in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 is due primarily to a 15% decrease in average headcount, primarily as a result of the workforce reduction in our worldwide consulting group during second quarter 2007 and an $825,000 decrease in outside contractor costs on consulting projects in the United States.

25

Gross Profit

          The increase in gross profit dollars in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 resulted primarily from the $3.2 million increase in revenue and the $1.7 million decrease in cost of service revenues. The gross margin percentage increased to 62% in first quarter 2008 compared to 59% in first quarter 2007 due to the 18% increase in software license revenues which have a higher gross margin than maintenance and service revenues.

          The increase in service gross profit dollars in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 is due primarily to reduced service costs resulting from a 15% decrease in average headcount, primarily as a result of the workforce reduction in our worldwide consulting group during second quarter 2007, which improved utilization rates, and an $825,000 decrease in outside contractor costs on consulting projects in the United States, offset in part by the $1.2 million decrease in service revenues. Service margins as a percentage of service revenues were 21% in first quarter 2008 and 19% in first quarter 2007.

Operating Expenses

          Product Development. Product development expense was flat in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. Although average headcount in our product development function increased 7% in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007, salaries and related benefits decreased $252,000 as new and replacement positions were filled with lower cost resources, including those added at the CoE operation in India. In addition, outside contractor costs decreased $268,000 in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007. These decreases were substantially offset by a $253,000 decrease in capitalized costs for ongoing funded development efforts and an increase in travel costs.

          Sales and Marketing. The increase in sales and marketing expense in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 is due primarily to a $580,000 increase in commissions resulting from the 18% increase in software license sales, a 5% increase in average sales and marketing headcount and a $432,000 increase in marketing-related activities including costs for trade shows, public relations and industry analyst fees.

          General and Administrative. The increase in general and administrative expense in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 is due primarily to a 10% increase in average headcount, which resulted in higher salaries and related benefits, a $420,000 increase in incentive compensation due to the Company’s improved operating performance, including $234,000 in stock-based compensation and a $352,000 increase in accounting fees primarily for tax-related services.

          Provision of Doubtful Accounts. We recorded no provision for doubtful accounts in first quarter 2008 compared to $288,000 in first quarter 2007.

          Amortization of Intangibles. The increase in amortization of intangibles in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 is due primarily from a change in the estimated useful life of certain customer lists to reflect current trends in attrition. With this change, the quarterly amortization expense on customer lists increased approximately $2.1 million per quarter, beginning first quarter 2008 and continuing over the remaining useful life of the related customer lists which extend through June 2014. This change had a $0.04 per share impact (reduction) on first quarter 2008 basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

          Restructuring Charges and Adjustments to Acquisition Reserves. We recorded a restructuring charge of $794,000 in first quarter 2008 that included $722,000 in termination benefits, primarily related to a workforce reduction of 13 consulting and sales-related positions in the United States and the European region, and $72,000 for office closure and integration costs of redundant office facilities. We reduced the Manugistics acquisition reserves by $38,000 in first quarter 2008 due to our revised estimate of the reserves for employee severance and termination benefits.

          We recorded a restructuring charge of $4.0 million in first quarter 2007 that included $3.8 million in termination benefits, primarily related to a workforce reduction of approximately 120 FTE in our Scottsdale, Arizona product development group. This restructuring is a direct result of our decision to standardize future product offerings on the new JDA Enterprise Architecture platform. The restructuring charge also included $145,000 for office closure and integration costs of a redundant office facility in Spain.

          Gain on Sale of Office Facility. During first quarter 2007 we sold a 15,000 square foot facility in the United Kingdom for approximately $6.3 million and recognized a gain of $4.1 million.

26

Operating Income

          Operating income decreased $697,000 to $9.8 million in first quarter 2008 compared to operating income of $10.5 million in first quarter 2006. The decrease in operating income resulted primarily from an increase in amortization due to a change in the estimated useful life of certain customer list intangibles that was substantially offset by higher revenues.

          Operating income in our Retail reportable business segment increased to $13.0 million in first quarter 2008 compared to $10.2 million in first quarter 2007. The increase in operating income in this reportable business segment resulted primarily from a $2.7 million increase in product revenues, an 11% decrease in cost of service revenues and a 6% decrease in product development costs, offset in part by a $2.0 million decrease in service revenues.

          Operating income in our Manufacturing and Distribution reportable business segment decreased to $14.7 million in first quarter 2008 from $15.5 million in first quarter 2007. The decrease resulted primarily from a 28% increase in allocated sales and marketing costs based upon the pro rata share of software sales that came from this reportable business segment, offset in part by a 2% increase in total revenues.

          The Services Industries reportable business segment had operating income of $576,000 in first quarter 2008 compared to an operating loss of $724,000 in first quarter 2007. The increase resulted primarily from increases in product and service revenues of $1.1 million and $550,000, offset in part by an $847,000 increase in operating costs for product development and sales and marketing activities.

          The combined operating income reported in the reportable business segments excludes $18.4 million and $14.5 million of general and administrative expenses and other charges in first quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively, that are not directly identified with a particular reportable business segment and which management does not consider in evaluating the operating income (loss) of the reportable business segments.

Other Income (Expense)

          Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Fees. We incurred interest expense of $2.3 million and recorded $164,000 in amortization of loan origination fees in first quarter 2008 compared to $2.9 million and $548,000, respectively in first quarter 2007. During fourth quarter 2007 we revised the amortization period for the loan origination fees to extend through the scheduled maturity date based on management’s decision that the Company will only make scheduled quarterly installments or other mandatory repayments over the remaining term of the loan rather than accelerate the repayment of the debt obligations. We repaid $5.6 million of our long-term debt in first quarter 2008 including a scheduled quarterly installment of $437,500 plus an additional $5.2 million mandatory repayment based on a percentage of our annual excess cash flow, as defined in the agreement. We repaid $15.0 million of the long-term debt obligations in first quarter 2007.

          Interest Income and Other, Net. We recorded interest income and other, net of $1.3 million in first quarter 2008 compared to $669,000 in first quarter 2007. The increase is due primarily to a $498,000 increase in foreign currency gains. Foreign currency gains and losses were previously reported in operating expenses and were not material.

27

Income Tax Provision

          We calculate income taxes on an interim basis using the year-to-date effective tax rate and record discrete tax adjustments in the reporting period in which they occur. A summary of the income tax provision recorded in first quarter 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2008			2007
Income before income tax provision	$	8,660		$	7,761
Effective tax rate		37	%		30	%
Income tax provision at effective tax rate		3,200			2,293
Discrete tax item benefits:
Interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions		108			115
Changes in estimate and foreign statutory rates		(4	)		(63	)
Total discrete tax item benefits		104			52
Income tax provision	$	3,304		$	2,345

          The income tax provision recorded in first quarter 2008 and 2007 takes into account the source of taxable income, domestically by state and internationally by country, and available income tax credits, and does not include the tax benefits realized from the employee stock options exercised during first quarter 2008 and 2007 of $5,000 and $92,000, respectively. These tax benefits reduce our income tax liabilities and are included as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

          The effective tax rate in first quarter 2008 is higher than the effective tax rate in first quarter 2007 primarily due to the mix of revenue by jurisdiction being weighted more toward the United States which has a higher effective tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

          We had working capital of $79.2 million at March 31, 2008 compared to $67.9 million at December 31, 2007. The working capital balances at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include $109.7 million and $95.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, respectively. Our excess cash balances are invested primarily in money market accounts. The increase in working capital resulted primarily from $23.1 million in cash flow from operating activities, offset in part by the repayment of $5.6 million of long-term debt and $2.2 million of capital expenditures.

          Net accounts receivable were $82.5 million or 79 days sales outstanding (“DSO”) at March 31, 2008 compared to $74.7 million or 68 DSO at December 31, 2007. Our quarterly DSO results historically increase during the first quarter of each year due to the heavy annual maintenance renewal billings that occur during this time frame and then typically decrease slowly over the remainder of the year. DSO results can fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis due to a number of factors including the percentage of total revenues that comes from software license sales which typically have installment payment terms, seasonality, shifts in customer buying patterns, the timing of customer payments and annual maintenance renewals, lengthened contractual payment terms in response to competitive pressures, the underlying mix of products and services, and the geographic concentration of revenues.

          Operating activities provided cash of $23.1 million in the first quarter 2008 compared to $18.4 million in first quarter 2007. The principle sources of our cash flow from operations are typically net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization and bad debt provisions, collections on accounts receivable, and increases in deferred maintenance revenue. Cash flow from operations in first quarter 2007 was reduced by a $4.1 gain on the sale of the office facility in Westerham. The increase in cash flow from operations in first quarter 2008 compared to first quarter 2007 also includes a $1.8 million increase in depreciation and amortization, a $1.2 million larger increase in deferred revenue and a $1.3 million larger increase in income tax payable, offset by a $4.6 million larger decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities resulting from payment of larger accrued incentive compensation balances due to the Company’s improved operating performance in fourth quarter 2007.

          Investing activities utilized cash of $3.5 million in first quarter 2008 and provided cash of $2.0 million in first quarter 2007. Net cash utilized by investing activities in first quarter 2008 includes capital expenditures of $2.2 million and the payment of $1.4 million of direct costs associated with the Manugistics acquisition. Net cash provided by investing activities in first quarter 2007

28

includes $6.8 million in proceeds from the disposal of property and equipment, including $6.3 million from the sale of the office facility in the United Kingdom, offset by capital expenditures of $2.5 million and the payment of $2.3 million of direct costs associated with the Manugistics acquisition.

          Financing activities utilized cash of $7.0 million in first quarter 2008 and $13.4 million in first quarter 2007. Financing activities in first quarter 2008 include repayment of $5.6 million of long-term debt and the $1.4 million repurchase of shares tendered by employees for the payment of applicable statutory withholding taxes on the issuance of restricted stock. Financing activities in first quarter 2007 include repayment of $15.0 million in long-term debt offset in part by $1.5 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock plans.

          Changes in the currency exchange rates of our foreign operations had the effect of increasing cash by $1.8 million in first quarter 2008 and $559,000 in first quarter 2007 due to the continuing weakness of the US Dollar against major foreign currencies including the British Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Japanese Yen. We use derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange contracts, to manage a majority of the short-term foreign currency exchange exposure associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not hedge the potential impact of foreign currency exposure on our ongoing revenues and expenses from foreign operations. The exposures relate primarily to the gain or loss recognized in earnings from the revaluation or settlement of current foreign denominated assets and liabilities. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The forward exchange contracts generally have maturities of less than 90 days, and are not designated as hedging instruments under Financial Accounting Standard No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS No. 133”). Forward exchange contracts are marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period, with gains and losses recognized in other income, net, offset by the gains or losses resulting from the settlement of the underlying foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

          Treasury Stock Purchases. During first quarter 2008 and 2007, we repurchased 79,343 and 2,185 shares, respectively, tendered by employees for the payment of applicable statutory withholding taxes on the issuance of restricted shares under the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan. These shares were repurchased for $1.4 million at prices ranging from $17.64 to $18.73 per share in first quarter 2008 and for $28,000 at prices ranging from $11.19 to $15.42 per share in first quarter 2007.

          Contractual Obligations. As of March 31, 2008, we had $93.9 million in outstanding borrowings under term loan agreements which are due in quarterly installments of $437,500 through July 5, 2013, with the remaining balance due at maturity. In addition to the scheduled maturities, the term loan agreements also require additional mandatory repayments on the term loans based on a percentage of our annual excess cash flow, as defined. Pursuant to this provision, we remitted an additional mandatory payment of $5.2 million on the term loans in first quarter 2008. Interest is payable quarterly on the term loans at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) + 2.25%. We entered into an interest rate swap agreement on July 28, 2006 to fix LIBOR at 5.365% on $140 million, or 80% of the aggregate term loans. We have structured the interest rate swap with decreasing notional amounts to match the expected pay down of the debt. The notional value of the interest rate swap was $76.0 million at March 31, 2008 and represented approximately 81% of the aggregate term loan balance. The interest rate swap agreement is effective through October 5, 2009 and has been designated a cash flow hedge derivative.

          We lease office space in the Americas for 13 regional sales and support offices across the United States, Canada and Latin America, and for 14 international sales and support offices located in major cities throughout Europe, Asia, Australia, and Japan. The leases are primarily non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms ranging from one to 20 years that expire at various dates through the year 2018. None of the leases contain contingent rental payments; however, certain of the leases contain scheduled rent increases and renewal options. We expect that in the normal course of business most of these leases will be renewed or that suitable additional or alternative space will be available on commercially reasonable terms as needed. In addition, we lease various computers, telephone systems, automobiles, and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms ranging from 12 to 48 months. Certain of the equipment leases contain renewal options and we expect that in the normal course of business some or all of these leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases.

          We believe our existing cash balances and net cash provided from operations will provide adequate liquidity to meet our normal operating requirements for the foreseeable future. A major component of our positive cash flow is the collection of accounts receivable and the generation of cash earnings.

29

Critical Accounting Policies

          We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. The preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

•	Revenue recognition. Our revenue recognition policy is significant because our revenue is a key component of our results of operations. In addition, our revenue recognition determines the timing of certain expenses such as commissions and royalties. We follow specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue; however, certain judgments affect the application of our revenue policy.
	We license software primarily under non-cancelable agreements and provide related services, including consulting, training and customer support. We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position 97-2 (“SOP 97-2”), Software Revenue Recognition, as amended and interpreted by Statement of Position 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with respect to certain transactions, as well as Technical Practice Aids issued from time to time by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Accounting Research Bulletin No. 45, Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts (“ARB No. 45”), Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (“SOP 81-1”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, that provides further interpretive guidance for public companies on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements.
	Software license revenue is generally recognized using the residual method when:

Ø	Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and a license agreement has been signed;
Ø	Delivery, which is typically FOB shipping point, is complete;
Ø	Fees are fixed and determinable and there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance;
Ø	Collection is considered probable; and
Ø	Vendor-specific evidence of fair value (“VSOE”) exists for all undelivered elements.

Our customer arrangements typically contain multiple elements that include software, options for future purchases of software products not previously licensed to the customer, maintenance, consulting and training services. The fees from these arrangements are allocated to the various elements based on VSOE. Under the residual method, if an arrangement contains an undelivered element, the VSOE of the undelivered element is deferred and the revenue recognized once the element is delivered. If we are unable to determine VSOE for any undelivered element included in an arrangement, we will defer revenue recognition until all elements have been delivered. In addition, if a software license contains milestones, customer acceptance criteria or a cancellation right, the software revenue is recognized upon the achievement of the milestone or upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period or cancellation right. For arrangements that provide for significant services or custom development that are essential to the software’s functionality, the software license revenue and contracted services are recognized under the percentage of completion method as prescribed in the provisions of ARB No. 45 and SOP 81-1.

Maintenance services are separately priced and stated in our arrangements. Maintenance services typically include on-line support, access to our Solution Centers via telephone and web interfaces, comprehensive error diagnosis and correction, and the right to receive unspecified upgrades and enhancements, when and if we make them generally available. Maintenance services are generally billed on a monthly basis and recorded as revenue in the applicable month, or billed on an annual basis with the revenue initially deferred and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. VSOE for maintenance services is the price customers will be required to pay when it is sold separately, which is typically the renewal rate.

Consulting and training services are separately priced and stated in our arrangements, are generally available from a number of suppliers, and are generally not essential to the functionality of our software products. Consulting services include project management, system planning, design and implementation, customer configurations, and training. These services are generally billed bi-weekly on an hourly basis or pursuant to the terms of a fixed price contract. Consulting services revenue billed on an hourly basis is recognized as the work is performed. Under fixed price service contracts and milestone-based

30

	arrangements that include services that are not essential to the functionality of our software products, consulting services revenue is recognized using the proportional performance method. We measure progress-to-completion under the proportional performance method by using input measures, primarily labor hours, which relate hours incurred to date to total estimated hours at completion. We continually update and revise our estimates of input measures. If our estimates indicate that a loss will be incurred, the entire loss is recognized in that period. Training revenues are included in consulting revenues in the Company’s consolidated statements of income and are recognized once the training services are provided. VSOE for consulting and training services is based upon the hourly or per class rates charged when those services are sold separately. We offer hosting services on certain of our software products under arrangements in which the end users do not take possession of the software. Revenues from hosting services are included in consulting revenues, billed monthly and recognized as the services are provided. Revenues from our hardware reseller business are also included in consulting revenues, reported net (i.e., the amount billed to a customer less the amount paid to the supplier) pursuant to EITF 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, and recognized upon shipment of the hardware.
	Customers are reviewed for creditworthiness before we enter into a new arrangement that provides for software and/or a service element. We do not sell or ship our software, nor recognize any license revenue unless we believe that collection is probable. Payments for our software licenses are typically due within twelve months from the date of delivery. Although infrequent, where software license agreements call for payment terms of twelve months or more from the date of delivery, revenue is recognized as payments become due and all other conditions for revenue recognition have been satisfied.
•	Accounts Receivable. Consistent with industry practice and to be competitive in the retail software marketplace, we typically provide payment terms on most software license sales. Software licenses are generally due within twelve months from the date of delivery. Customers are reviewed for creditworthiness before we enter into a new arrangement that provides for software and/or a service element. We do not sell or ship our software, nor recognize any revenue unless we believe that collection is probable in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 8 in Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. For those customers who are not credit worthy, we require prepayment of the software license fee or a letter of credit before we will ship our software. We have a history of collecting software payments when they come due without providing refunds or concessions. Consulting services are generally billed bi-weekly and maintenance services are billed annually or monthly. For those customers who are significantly delinquent or whose credit deteriorates, we typically put the account on hold and do not recognize any further services revenue, and may as appropriate withdraw support and/or our implementation staff until the situation has been resolved.
	We do not have significant billing or collection problems. We review each past due account and provide specific reserves based upon the information we gather from various sources including our customers, subsequent cash receipts, consulting services project teams, members of each region’s management, and credit rating services such as Dun and Bradstreet. Although infrequent and unpredictable, from time to time certain of our customers have filed bankruptcy, and we have been required to refund the pre-petition amounts collected and settle for less than the face value of their remaining receivable pursuant to a bankruptcy court order. In these situations, as soon as it becomes probable that the net realizable value of the receivable is impaired, we provide reserves on the receivable. In addition, we monitor economic conditions in the various geographic regions in which we operate to determine if general reserves or adjustments to our credit policy in a region are appropriate for deteriorating conditions that may impact the net realizable value of our receivables.
•	Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Our business combinations typically result in goodwill and other intangible assets, which affect the amount of future period amortization expense and potential impairment charges we may incur. The determination of the value of such intangible assets and the annual impairment tests required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), requires management to make estimates of future revenues, customer retention rates and other assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements.
	Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in business circumstances indicate the asset might be impaired, using a two-step process that compares a weighted average of the fair value of future cash flows under the “Discounted Cash Flow Method of the Income Approach” and the “Guideline Company Method” to the carrying value of goodwill allocated to our reporting units. We found no indication of impairment of our goodwill balances during the three months ended March 31, 2008 with respect to the goodwill allocated to our Retail, Manufacturing and Distribution and Services Industries reportable business segments and, absent future indicators of impairment, the next annual impairment test will be performed in fourth quarter 2008.
	Customer lists are amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 8 years to 13 years. The values allocated to customer list intangibles are based on the projected economic life of each acquired customer base, using

31

historical turnover rates and discussions with the management of the acquired companies. We estimate the economic lives of these assets using the historical life experiences of the acquired companies as well as our historical experience with similar customer accounts for products that we have developed internally. We review customer attrition rates for each significant acquired customer group on annual basis, or more frequently if events or circumstances change, to ensure the rate of attrition is not increasing and if revisions to the estimated economic lives are required. In first quarter 2008 we changed the estimated useful life of certain customer lists to reflect current trends in attrition. With this change, the quarterly amortization expense on customer lists increased to $4.9 million, or approximately $2.1 million per quarter, beginning first quarter 2008 and continuing over the remaining useful life of the related customer lists which extend through June 2014. This change had a $0.04 per share impact (reduction) on first quarter 2008 basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

	Acquired software technology is capitalized if the related software product under development has reached technological feasibility or if there are alternative future uses for the purchased software. Amortization of software technology is reported as a cost of product revenues in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed (“SFAS No. 86”). Software technology is amortized on a product-by-product basis with the amortization recorded for each product being the greater of the amount computed using (a) the ratio that current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future revenue for that product, or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product including the period being reported on. The estimated economic lives of our acquired software technology range from 5 years to 15 years.
	Trademarks have been acquired primarily in the acquisitions of Manugistics and E3 Corporation (“E3”). The Manugistics and E3 trademarks are being amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated remaining useful lives of 3 years.
•	Product Development. The costs to develop new software products and enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed. We consider technological feasibility to have occurred when all planning, designing, coding and testing have been completed according to design specifications. Once technological feasibility is established, any additional costs would be capitalized. We believe our current process for developing software is essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility, and accordingly, no costs have been capitalized.
•	Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS No. 109”). Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. We follow specific and detailed guidelines regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide valuation allowances when recovery of deferred tax assets is not considered likely.
	We exercise significant judgment in determining our income tax provision due to transactions, credits and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Uncertainties arise as a consequence of the actual source of taxable income between domestic and foreign locations, the outcome of tax audits and the ultimate utilization of tax credits. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the final tax determination could differ from our recorded income tax provision and accruals. In such case, we would adjust the income tax provision in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. These adjustments could have a material impact on our income tax provision and our net income for that period.
	We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 was $3.5 million, of which $799,000 would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. With the adoption of FIN 48, we recognized a charge of approximately $1.0 million to beginning retained earnings for uncertain tax positions. In addition, a FIN 48 adjustment of $2.9 million was made to the purchase price allocation on the Manugistics acquisition to record a tax liability for uncertain tax positions which increased the goodwill balance. Other than the settlement of a tax audit in Germany, which could result in a decrease of approximately $800,000 in the FIN 48 tax liability in 2008, we do not believe there are any uncertain tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.
	The FIN 48 adjustments on January 1, 2007 include an accrual of approximately $1.3 million for interest and penalties. To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to the uncertain tax positions, the accrued amounts for interest

32

and penalties will be reduced and reflected as a reduction of the overall tax provision. We have accrued additional interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of $630,000 in 2007, including $115,000 in first quarter 2007, and $108,000 in first quarter 2008 which are included as a component of income tax expense.

•	Stock-Based Compensation. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) effective January 1, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method. Under the “modified prospective” method, share-based compensation expense recognized in our financial statements will now include (i) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated under the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”), and (ii) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 under the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as an operating cash flow.
	We do not expect that outstanding stock options will result in a significant compensation expense charge as all stock options were fully vested prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Stock options are no longer used for share-based compensation. A 2005 Performance Incentive Plan (“2005 Incentive Plan”) was approved by our stockholders on May 16, 2005 that provides for the issuance of up to 1,847,000 shares of common stock to employees, consultants and directors under stock purchase rights, stock bonuses, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, performance units and deferred compensation awards. With the adoption of the 2005 Incentive Plan, we terminated all prior stock option plans except for those provisions necessary to administer the outstanding options. The 2005 Incentive Plan contains certain restrictions that limit the number of shares that may be issued and cash awarded under each type of award, including a limitation that awards granted in any given year can be no more than two percent (2%) of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of the last day of the preceding fiscal year. Awards granted under the 2005 Incentive Plan will be in such form as the Compensation Committee shall from time to time establish and may or may not be subject to vesting conditions based on the satisfaction of service requirements or other conditions, restrictions or performance criteria including the Company’s achievement of annual operating goals. Restricted stock and restricted stock units may also be granted as a component of an incentive package offered to new employees or to existing employees based on performance or in connection with a promotion, and will generally vest over a three-year period, commencing at the date of grant. We measure the fair value of awards under the 2005 Incentive Plan based on the market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of grant. The awards are amortized over their applicable vesting period using graded vesting.
	Restricted Stock Units. On August 18, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a special Manugistics Incentive Plan (“Integration Plan”). The Integration Plan provided for the issuance of contingently issuable restricted stock units under the 2005 Incentive Plan to executive officers and certain other members of our management team if we were able to successfully integrate the Manugistics acquisition and achieve a defined performance threshold goal in 2007. The performance threshold goal was defined as $85 million of adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), which excludes certain non-routine items. A partial pro-rata issuance of restricted stock units would be made if we achieved a minimum performance threshold. The Board approved additional contingently issuable restricted stock units under the Integration Plan for executive officers and new participants in 2007. The Company’s actual EBITDA performance for 2007 was approved by the Board in January 2008 and qualified participants for a pro-rata issuance equal to 99.25% of the contingently issuable restricted stock units. In total, 502,935 restricted stock units were issued on January 28, 2008 with a grant date fair value of $8.1 million. The restricted stock units vested 50% upon the date of issuance with the remaining 50% vesting ratably over the subsequent 24-month period.
	The Company’s performance against the defined performance threshold goal of the Integration Plan was evaluated on a quarterly basis throughout 2007 and stock-based compensation recognized on a graded vesting basis over the requisite service periods that run from the date of the various board approvals through January 2010. A deferred compensation charge of $8.1 million was recorded in the equity section of our balance sheet during 2007, with a related increase to additional paid-in capital, for the total grant date fair value of the awards. We recognized $5.4 million in stock-based compensation expense related to these restricted stock unit awards in 2007, including $778,000 in first quarter 2007, plus an additional $332,000 in first quarter 2008. These charges are reflected in the consolidated statements of income under the captions “Cost of maintenance services,” “Cost of consulting services,” “Product development,” “Sales and marketing,” and “General and administrative.”
	Performance Share Awards. On February 7, 2008, the Board approved an incentive plan for 2008 similar to the Integration Plan (“New Incentive Plan”). The New Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of contingently issuable performance share

33

awards under the 2005 Incentive Plan to executive officers and certain other members of our management team if we are able to achieve a defined performance threshold goal in 2008. The performance threshold goal is defined as $95 million of adjusted EBITDA which excludes certain non-routine items. A partial pro-rata issuance of performance share awards will be made if we achieve a minimum performance threshold. The New Incentive Plan initially provides for up to 259,516 contingently issuable performance share awards. The performance share awards, if any, will be issued after the approval of our 2008 financial results in January 2009 and will vest 50% upon the date of issuance with the remaining 50% vesting ratably over a 24-month period.

	The Company’s performance against the defined performance threshold goal of the New Incentive Plan will be evaluated on a quarterly basis throughout 2008 and stock-based compensation recognized over the requisite service period that runs from the date of board approval through January 2011. A deferred compensation charge of $4.2 million was recorded in the equity section of our balance sheet in first quarter 2008, with a related increase to additional paid-in capital, for the total grant date fair value of the awards. Although all necessary service and performance conditions have not been met through March 31, 2008, based on first quarter 2008 results and the outlook for the remainder of 2008, management has determined that it is probable that the performance condition will ultimately be met. As a result, we recorded $703,000 in stock-based compensation expense related to these awards in first quarter 2008 on a graded vesting basis. This charge is reflected in the consolidated statements of income under the captions “Cost of maintenance services,” “Cost of consulting services,” “Product development,” “Sales and marketing,” and “General and administrative.” If we achieve the defined performance threshold goal we would expect to recognize approximately $2.8 million of the award as stock-based compensation in 2008.
•	Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”). We use derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange contracts, to manage a majority of the foreign currency exchange exposure associated with net short-term foreign denominated assets and liabilities which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. The exposures relate primarily to the gain or loss recognized in earnings from the settlement of current foreign denominated assets and liabilities. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The forward exchange contracts generally have maturities of less than 90 days, and are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133. Forward exchange contracts are marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period, with gains and losses recognized in other income offset by the gains or losses resulting from the settlement of the underlying foreign denominated assets and liabilities.
	We are exposed to interest rate risk in connection with our long-term debt which provides for quarterly interest payments at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) + 2.25%. To manage this risk, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement on July 28, 2006 to fix LIBOR at 5.365% on $140 million, or 80% of the aggregate term loans. We have structured the interest rate swap with decreasing notional amounts to match the expected pay down of the debt. The notional value of the interest rate swap was $76.0 million at March 31, 2008 and represented approximately 81% of the aggregate term loan balance. The interest rate swap agreement is effective through October 5, 2009 and has been designated a cash flow hedge derivative. SFAS No. 133 requires derivatives to be recorded as either an asset or a liability in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as highly effective and qualify as a cash flow hedge are deferred and recorded as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” until net income is affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction (i.e., that quarterly payment of interest). When the hedged transaction affects earnings, the resulting gain or loss is reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” to the consolidated statement of income on the same line as the underlying transaction (i.e., interest expense). A change in the fair value of an ineffective portion of a hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings. We evaluate the effectiveness of the cash flow hedge derivative on a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2008, the hedge was highly effective and we have recorded a net unrealized loss of $456,000 in “Accumulated other comprehensive income.” The interest rate swap had a negative fair value of $1.8 million at March 31, 2008. This value was determined in accordance with SFAS No. 157 using Level 2 observable inputs and approximates the net loss that would have been realized if the contract had been settled at March 31, 2008.

Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. While SFAS No. 157 will not impact our valuation methods, it will expand our disclosures of assets and liabilities which are recorded at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods

34

within those fiscal years. We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

          In February 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective beginning the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We do not currently intend to expand the use of fair value measurements in our financial reporting.

          In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of SFAS No. 141 that require all business combinations to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting, however, SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes certain aspects of the prior guidance including: (i) acquisition-related costs, except for those costs incurred to issue debt or equity securities, will no longer be capitalized and must be expensed in the period incurred; (ii) non-controlling interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date; (iii) in-process research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; (iv) restructuring costs associated with a business combination will no longer be capitalized and must be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and (v) changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date will no longer be recorded as an adjustment of goodwill, rather such changes will be recognized through income tax expense or directly in contributed capital. SFAS 141(R) is effective for all business combinations having an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS 141(R) amends SFAS 109 such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS 141(R) would also apply the provisions of SFAS 141(R). We are currently evaluating the effects that SFAS 141(R) may have on our financial statements.

          In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires expanded qualitative, quantitative and credit-risk disclosures about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities, but does not change scope or accounting requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 161 also amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to clarify that derivative instruments are subject to concentration-of-credit-risk disclosures. SFAS No. 161 is effective beginning the first fiscal year and interim period that begins after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 161 on the disclosures in our interim and fiscal year financial statements.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

          We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks result primarily from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In addition, our international operations are subject to risks related to differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, and other regulations and restrictions.

          Foreign currency exchange rates. Our international operations expose us to foreign currency exchange rate changes that could impact translations of foreign denominated assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars and future earnings and cash flows from transactions denominated in different currencies. International revenues represented 40% of our total revenues in 2007 and in first quarter 2008. In addition, the identifiable net assets of our foreign operations totaled 29% of consolidated net assets at March 31, 2008, as compared to 28% at December 31, 2007. Our exposure to currency exchange rate changes is diversified due to the number of different countries in which we conduct business. We operate outside the United States primarily through wholly owned subsidiaries in Europe, Asia/Pacific, Canada and Latin America. We have determined that the functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency and as such, foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Changes in the currency exchange rates of our foreign subsidiaries resulted in our reporting unrealized foreign currency exchange gains of $1.4 million and $192,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

          Foreign currency gains and losses will continue to result from fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we conduct operations as compared to the U.S. Dollar, and future operating results will be affected to some extent by gains and losses from foreign currency exposure. We prepared sensitivity analyses of our exposures from foreign net working capital as of March 31, 2008 to assess the impact of hypothetical changes in foreign currency rates. Based upon the results of these analyses, a 10% adverse change in all foreign currency rates from the March 31, 2008 rates would result in a currency translation loss of $2.0 million before tax. We use derivative financial instruments to manage this risk.

35

          We use derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange contracts, to manage a majority of the foreign currency exchange exposure associated with net short-term foreign denominated assets and liabilities which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. The exposures relate primarily to the gain or loss recognized in earnings from the revaluation or settlement of current foreign denominated assets and liabilities. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The forward exchange contracts generally have maturities of less than 90 days, and are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133. Forward exchange contracts are marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period, with gains and losses recognized in other income offset by the gains or losses resulting from the settlement of the underlying foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

          At March 31, 2008, we had forward exchange contracts with a notional value of $19.6 million and an associated net forward contract receivable of $436,000. At December 31, 2007, we had forward exchange contracts with a notional value of $28.4 million and an associated net forward contract liability of $131,000. The forward contract receivables or liabilities are included under the captions “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” or “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” as appropriate. The notional value represents the amount of foreign currencies to be purchased or sold at maturity and does not represent our exposure on these contracts. We prepared sensitivity analyses of the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our forward exchange contracts at March 31, 2008. Based on the results of these analyses, a 10% adverse change in all foreign currency rates from the March 31, 2008 rates would result in a net forward contract liability of $1.1 million that would increase the underlying currency transaction loss on our net foreign assets. We recorded a foreign currency exchange contract gain of $498,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2008 and a foreign currency exchange contract loss of $58,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2007.

          Interest rates. Our excess cash balances as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were invested in money market accounts. Cash balances in foreign currencies overseas are operating balances and are invested in short-term deposits of the local operating bank. We have historically invested our cash in a variety of financial instruments denominated in U.S. dollars, including bank time deposits and variable and fixed rate obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies, states, municipalities, commercial paper and corporate bonds, and have classified all of our investments as available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Interest income earned on our investments is reflected in our financial statements under the caption “Interest income and other, net.” Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates.

          We are exposed to interest rate risk in connection with our long-term debt which provides for quarterly interest payments at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) + 2.25%. To manage this risk, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement on July 28, 2006 to fix LIBOR at 5.365% on $140 million, or 80% of the aggregate term loans. The interest rate swap was structured with decreasing notional amounts to match our expected pay down of the debt. The notional value of the interest rate swap was $76.0 million at March 31, 2008 and represented approximately 81% of the aggregate term loan balance. The interest rate swap agreement is effective through October 5, 2009 and has been designated a cash flow hedge derivative. We evaluate the effectiveness of the cash flow hedge derivative on a quarterly basis. During the three months ended March 31, 2008 the hedge was highly effective and a net unrealized loss of $456,000 was recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income.” The interest rate swap had a negative fair value of $1.8 million at March 31, 2008. This value was determined in accordance with SFAS No. 157 using Level 2 observable inputs and approximates the net loss that would have been realized if the contract had been settled at March 31, 2008.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

          Disclosure Controls and Procedures. During and subsequent to the reporting period, and under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures that were in effect at the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) as those controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures that were in effect on March 31, 2008 were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports to be filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial

36

officer, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

          Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The term “internal control over financial reporting” is defined under Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act and refers to the process of a company that is designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

          During first quarter 2008 we hired a new Vice President of Tax and upgraded certain other positions within our tax department. Other then these personnel changes, there were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

           We are involved in legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business.  Although there can be no assurance, management does not currently believe the disposition of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

          We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The following section describes material risks and uncertainties that we believe may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or the market price of our stock. This section should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of March 31, 2008 and for the three months then ended contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Risks Related To Our Business

We may misjudge when software sales will be realized

          Software license revenues in any quarter depend substantially upon contracts signed and the related shipment of software in that quarter. It is therefore difficult for us to accurately predict software license revenues. Because of the timing of our sales, we typically recognize the substantial majority of our software license revenues in the last weeks or days of the quarter. In addition, it is difficult to forecast the timing of large individual software license sales with a high degree of certainty due to the extended length of the sales cycle and the generally more complex contractual terms that may be associated with such licenses that could result in the deferral of some or all of the revenue to future periods. Our customers and potential customers, especially for large individual software license sales, are requiring that their senior executives, board of directors and significant equity investors approve such sales without the benefit of the direct input from our sales representatives. As a result, large individual sales have sometimes occurred in quarters subsequent to when we anticipated, our sales process may be less visible than in the past and sales cycles are more difficult to predict. We expect to experience continued difficulty in accurately forecasting the timing of deals. If we receive any significant cancellation or deferral of customer orders, or we are unable to conclude license negotiations by the end of a fiscal quarter, our operating results may be lower than anticipated.

Economic, political and market conditions can adversely affect our revenue results and profitability 

37

          Our revenue and profitability depend on the overall demand for our software and related services. A regional and/or global change in the economy or financial markets could result in delay or cancellation of customer purchases. Current adverse conditions in credit markets and their effects on the United States and global economies and markets is an example of a negative change that has delayed certain customer purchases. Although these adverse conditions have only delayed a small number of customer deals to date, a further worsening or broadening, or protracted extension, of these conditions may have a more significant negative impact on our operating results. Such negative impacts could include, but are not limited to: a potential deterioration of our maintenance revenue base as customers look to reduce their costs, elongation of our selling cycles, and delay, suspension or reduction of the demand for our products. Weak and uncertain economic conditions also could impair our customers’ ability to pay for our products or services. Any of these factors could adversely impact our business, quarterly or annual operating results and financial condition.

          In addition, our growth strategy contemplates significant contributions from acquisitions. In general, we prefer to use cash from operations and debt rather than equity to acquire companies. The availability and cost of debt are dependencies, and, to the extent that debt becomes less available or more costly, our ability to execute our growth strategy will be impaired. Historically, developments associated with terrorist attacks on United States’ interests, continued violence in the Middle East, natural catastrophes or contagious diseases have resulted in economic, political and other uncertainties, and factors such as these could further adversely affect our revenue growth and operating results. If demand for our software and related services decrease, our revenues would decrease and our operating results would be adversely affected which, in turn, may cause our stock price to fall.

We may not receive significant revenues from our current research and development efforts 

          Developing and localizing software is expensive and the investment in product development often involves a long payback cycle. We have and expect to continue making significant investments in software research and development and related product opportunities. Accelerated product introductions and short product life cycles require high levels of expenditures for research and development that could adversely affect our operating results if not offset by revenue increases. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position. However, it is difficult to estimate when, if ever, we will receive significant revenues from these investments.

Our decision to move to the JDA Enterprise Architecture may present new risks

          We are developing our next generation JDA Enterprise Architecture solutions based upon service oriented architecture technologies. The JDA Enterprise Architecture is based on the technical platform originally developed by Manugistics and is based on Java J2EE. We made a decision in January 2007 to use the JDA Enterprise Architecture as our primary technology platform, rather than the Microsoft .NET platform that had been our primary technology platform for new product development. A significant factor in selecting the JDA Enterprise Architecture is that it is more mature than the Portfolio-Enabled platform we had been developing because Manugistics began its development efforts approximately two years before we began developing our Microsoft .NET based applications. As of March 31, 2008, there are nearly 200 customers that have installed and are using the JDA Enterprise Architecture in production.

          The risks of our commitment to the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform include, but are not limited to, the following:

• The possibility that it may be more difficult than we currently anticipate to develop additional, full-featured products for the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform and complete the planned transition of our product suite;

• The possibility that our sales organization may encounter difficulties in determining whether to propose existing products or the next generation JDA Enterprise Architecture products to current or prospective customers;

• The possibility we may not complete the transition to the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform within a timely manner;

• Our ability to transition our customer base onto the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform as additional products become available;

• The possibility that it may take several quarters for our consulting and support organizations to be fully trained and proficient on this new technology and, as a result, we may encounter difficulties implementing and supporting new products or versions of existing products based on the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform;

• We may be required to supplement our consulting and support organizations with JDA Enterprise Architecture proficient resources from our product development teams to support early JDA Enterprise Architecture

38

implementations which could impact our development schedule for the release of additional JDA Enterprise Architecture products.

          The risk associated with developing products that utilize new technologies remains high. Despite our increasing confidence in this investment and our efforts to mitigate the risks of the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform project, there can be no assurances that our efforts to migrate many of our current products and to develop new JDA Enterprise Architecture solutions will be successful. If the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform project is not successful, it likely will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may face liability if our products are defective or if we make errors implementing our products

          Our software products are highly complex and sophisticated. As a result, they occasionally contain design defects, software errors or security problems that are difficult to detect and correct. In addition, implementation of our products may involve customer-specific configuration by third parties or us, and may involve integration with systems developed by third parties. In particular, it is common for complex software programs such as ours to contain undetected errors, particularly in early versions of our products. They are discovered only after the product has been implemented and used over time with different computer systems and in a variety of applications and environments. Despite extensive testing, we have in the past discovered certain defects or errors in our products or custom configurations only after our software products have been used by many clients. In addition, our clients may occasionally experience difficulties integrating our products with other hardware or software in their environment that are unrelated to defects in our products. Such defects, errors or difficulties may cause future delays in product introductions, result in increased costs and diversion of development resources, require design modifications or impair customer satisfaction with our products.

          We believe that significant investments in research and development are required to remain competitive, and that speed to market is critical to our success. Our future performance will depend in large part on our ability to enhance our existing products through internal development and strategic partnering, internally develop new products which leverage both our existing customers and sales force, and strategically acquire complementary solutions that add functionality for specific business processes to an enterprise-wide system. If clients experience significant problems with implementation of our products or are otherwise dissatisfied with their functionality or performance or if they fail to achieve market acceptance for any reason, our market reputation could suffer, and we could be subject to claims for significant damages. There can be no assurances that the contract provisions in our customer agreements that limit our liability and exclude consequential damages will be enforced. Any such damages claim could impair our market reputation and could have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may have difficulty implementing our products

          Our software products are complex and perform or directly affect mission-critical functions across many different functional and geographic areas of the enterprise. Consequently, implementation of our software products can be a lengthy process, and commitment of resources by our clients is subject to a number of significant risks over which we have little or no control. The implementation time for certain of our applications, including Merchandise Operations Systems, Demand, Fulfillment and Revenue Management solutions can be longer and more complicated than our other applications as they typically (i) involve more significant integration efforts in order to complete implementation, (ii) require the execution of implementation procedures in multiple layers of software, (iii) offer a customer more deployment options and other configuration choices, and (iv) may involve third party integrators to change business processes concurrent with the implementation of the software. Delays in the implementations of any of our software products, whether by our business partners or us, may result in client dissatisfaction, disputes with our customers, or damage to our reputation.

          In addition, approximately 17% of our consulting services revenues are derived under fixed price arrangements that require us to provide identified deliverables for a fixed fee. If we are unable to meet our contractual obligations under fixed price contracts within our estimated cost structure, our operating results could suffer.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property  

          We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secrets, trademarks, confidentiality procedures, contractual restrictions and patents to protect our proprietary technology. Despite our efforts, these measures can only provide limited protection. Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer portions of our products or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. In addition, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our proprietary rights as do the laws of the United States or are not adequately enforced in a timely manner. If we cannot protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, we may not remain competitive.

39

Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property rights  

          We periodically receive notices from others claiming we are infringing their intellectual property rights, principally patent rights. We expect the number of such claims will increase as the functionality of products overlap and the volume of issued software patents continues to increase. Responding to any infringement claim, regardless of its validity, could:

• be time-consuming, costly and/or result in litigation;

• divert management’s time and attention from developing our business;

• require us to pay monetary damages or enter into royalty and licensing agreements that we would not normally find acceptable;

• require us to stop selling or to redesign certain of our products; or

• require us to satisfy indemnification obligations to our customers.

          If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be adversely affected.

If we lose access to critical third-party software or technology, our costs could increase and the introduction of new products and product enhancements could be delayed, potentially hurting our competitive position

          We license and integrate technology from third parties in certain of our software products. For example, we license the Uniface client/server application development technology from Compuware, Inc. for use in Portfolio Merchandise Management, certain applications from Silvon Software, Inc. for use in Performance Analysis by IDEAS, Cognos for use in JDA Reporting and JDA Analytics, the WebLogic application from BEA Systems, Inc. or the IBM Websphere applications for use in most of the JDA Enterprise Architecture platform solutions and the Data Integrator application from Business Object S.A which is also used in certain of the products acquired from Manugistics. Our third party licenses generally require us to pay royalties and fulfill confidentiality obligations. We also resell Oracle database licenses. If we are unable to continue to license any of this third party software, or if the third party licensors do not adequately maintain or update their products, we would face delays in the releases of our software until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed or developed, and integrated into our software products. These delays, if they occur, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. It is also possible that intellectual property acquired from third parties through acquisitions, mergers, licenses or otherwise obtained may not have been adequately protected, or infringes another parties intellectual property rights.

We may face difficulties in our highly competitive markets

          We encounter competitive products from a different set of vendors in each of our primary product categories. We believe that while our markets are still subject to intense competition, the number of competitors in many of our application markets has decreased over the past five years. We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets are feature and functionality, product reputation, performance and scalability, quality of referenceable accounts, vendor viability, ability to implement, retail and demand chain industry expertise, total solution cost, technology platform and quality of customer support.

          The intensely competitive markets in which we compete can put pressure on us to reduce our prices. If our competitors offer deep discounts on certain products, we may need to lower prices or offer other favorable terms in order to compete successfully. Any such changes would likely reduce margins and could adversely affect operating results. Our software license updates and product support fees are generally priced as a percentage of our new license fees. Our competitors may offer a lower percentage pricing on product updates and support, which could put pressure on us to further discount our new license prices. Any broadly-based changes to our prices and pricing policies could cause new software license and services revenues to decline or be delayed as our sales force implements and our customers adjust to the new pricing policies.

          The enterprise software market continues to consolidate and this has resulted in larger, new competitors with significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we possess. This could create a significant competitive advantage for our competitors and negatively impact our business. The consolidation trend is evidenced by our acquisition of Manugistics Group, Inc., Oracle’s acquisitions of Retek, ProfitLogic, Inc., 360Commerce, and Global Logistics Technologies, Inc. (G-LOG), and SAP AG’s acquisitions of Triversity, Inc. and Khimetrics, Inc. Oracle did not compete with our retail specific products prior to its acquisitions of Retek, ProfitLogic, Inc., 360Commerce, and Global Logistics Technologies, Inc. It is difficult to estimate what long term effect these acquisitions will have on our competitive environment. We have encountered competitive situations with certain enterprise software vendors where, in order to encourage customers to purchase licenses of their specific applications and gain retail market

40

share, we suspect they have also offered to license at no charge certain of its retail and/or supply chain software applications that compete with our solutions. If large competitors such as Oracle and SAP AG and other large private companies are willing to license their retail and/or other applications at no charge it may result in a more difficult competitive environment for our products. In addition, we could face competition from large, multi-industry technology companies that have historically not offered an enterprise solution set to the consumer products supply and demand chain market. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully for customers or acquisition targets against our current or future competitors, or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

          Although we are in the process of increasing our off-shore resources through our CoE in India, our consulting services business model is currently largely based on relatively high cost onshore resources and we are increasingly faced with competition from low cost off-shore service providers and smaller boutique consulting firms. This competition is expected to continue to grow and while we continue to successfully command premium rates for our on-shore services, which we believe offer good overall value for the money, our on-shore hourly rates are much higher than those offered by these competitors. As these competitors gain more experience with our products, the quality gap between our offerings may diminish and result in decreased revenues and profits from our consulting practice. In addition, we face increased competition for services work from ex-employees of JDA who offer services directly or through lower cost boutique consulting firms. These competitive service providers have taken business from JDA and while they are currently relatively small compared with our consulting services business, if they grow successfully then it will be largely at our expense. We are attempting to improve our competitive position by developing our own offshore consulting services group at our CoE; however, we cannot guarantee these efforts will be successful or enhance our ability to compete.

There are many risks associated with international operations

          International revenues represented 40% of our total revenues in 2007 and in first quarter 2008. As we grow our international operations, we may need to recruit and hire new consulting, product development, sales and marketing and support personnel in the countries in which we have or will establish offices. Entry into new international markets typically requires the establishment of new marketing and distribution channels, as well as the development and subsequent support of localized versions of our software. International introductions of our products often require a significant investment in advance of anticipated future revenues. In addition, the opening of a new office typically results in initial recruiting and training expenses and reduced labor efficiencies associated with the introduction of products to a new market. If we are less successful in a new market than we expect, we may not be able to realize an adequate return on our initial investment and our operating results could suffer. We cannot guarantee that the countries in which we operate will have a sufficient pool of qualified personnel from which to hire, that we will be successful at hiring, training or retaining such personnel or that we can expand or contract our international operations in a timely, cost effective manner. If we have to downsize certain international operations, the costs to do so are typically much higher than downsizing costs in the United States, particularly in Europe.

Our international business operations are subject to risks associated with international activities, including:

• Currency fluctuations, which could significantly increase with our planned expansion of the CoE in India;

• Higher operating costs due to local laws or regulations;

• Lower consulting margins;

• Unexpected changes in employment and other regulatory requirements;

• Tariffs and other trade barriers;

• Costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries;

• Longer accounts receivable payment cycles in certain countries;

• Potentially negative tax consequences;

• Difficulties in staffing and managing geographically disparate operations;

• Greater difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property, licensing and other trade restrictions;

• Ability to negotiate and have enforced favorable contract provisions;

• Repatriation of earnings;

• The burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws;

• Anti-American sentiment due to the war with Iraq, and other American policies that may be unpopular in certain regions;

• The challenges of finding qualified management for our international operations; and

• General economic conditions in international markets.

41

          We expect that an increasing portion of our international software license, consulting services and maintenance services revenues will be denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. If we expand our international operations, exposures to gains and losses on foreign currency transactions may increase. We use derivative financial instruments, primarily forward exchange contracts, to manage a majority of the foreign currency exchange exposure associated with net short-term foreign denominated assets and liabilities which exist as part of our ongoing business operations but we do not hedge ongoing or anticipated revenues, costs and expenses, including the additional costs we expect to incur with the expansion of the CoE in India. We cannot guarantee that any currency exchange strategy would be successful in avoiding exchange-related losses.

We may experience expansion delays or difficulties with our CoE in India

          We are in the process of significantly expanding our CoE in Hyderabad, India. In order to take advantage of cost efficiencies associated with India’s lower wage scale, we intend to expand the CoE during 2008 beyond a research and development center to include consulting services, customer support and information technology resources. We believe that a properly functioning CoE will be important in achieving desired long-term operating results. Delays in expanding the CoE or operating difficulties could impair our ability to develop, implement and support our products, which would likely negatively impact our operating results. Potential reasons for delays or difficulties, include, but are not limited to:

• Unexpected increases in labor costs in India;

• Inability to hire or retain sufficient personnel with the necessary skill sets to meet our needs;

• Economic, security and political conditions in India;

• Inadequate facilities or communications infrastructure; and

• Local law or regulatory issues.

We may have difficulty attracting and retaining skilled personnel

          Our success is heavily dependent upon our ability to attract, hire, train, retain and motivate skilled personnel, including sales and marketing representatives, qualified software engineers involved in ongoing product development, and consulting personnel who assist in the implementation of our products and provide other services. The market for such individuals is competitive. For example, it has been particularly difficult to attract and retain product development personnel experienced in object oriented development technologies. Given the critical roles of our sales, product development and consulting staffs, our inability to recruit successfully or any significant loss of key personnel would adversely affect us. A high level of employee mobility and aggressive recruiting of skilled personnel characterizes the software industry. It may be particularly difficult to retain or compete for skilled personnel against larger, better known software companies. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain our current personnel, attract and retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future, or be able to assimilate the employees from any acquired businesses. We will continue to adjust the size and composition of our workforce to match the different product and geographic demand cycles. If we are unable to attract and retain the necessary technical and managerial personnel, or assimilate the employees from any acquired businesses, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

We are dependent on key personnel

          Our performance depends in large part on the continued performance of our executive officers and other key employees, particularly the performance and services of James D. Armstrong our Chairman and Hamish N. J. Brewer our Chief Executive Officer. We do not have in place “key person” life insurance policies on any of our employees. The loss of the services of Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Brewer, or other key executive officers or employees without a successor in place, or any difficulties associated with a successor, could negatively affect our financial performance.

We may have difficulty integrating acquisitions

          We continually evaluate potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, products and technologies, including those that are significant in size and scope. In pursuit of our strategy to acquire complementary products, we have completed ten acquisitions over the past ten years, the most recent being Manugistics Group, Inc. in July 2006. The risks we commonly encounter in acquisitions include:

• We may have difficulty assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired company;

• The challenge to integrate new products and technologies into our sales and marketing process, particularly in the case of smaller acquisitions;

42

• We may have difficulty effectively integrating the acquired technologies or products with our current products and technologies, particularly where such products reside on different technology platforms, or overlap with our products;

• Our ongoing business may be disrupted by transition and integration issues;

• We may not be able to retain key technical and managerial personnel from the acquired business;

• We may be unable to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined businesses;

• We may have difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration;

• Our relationships with partner companies or third-party providers of technology or products could be adversely affected;

• Our relationships with employees and customers could be impaired;

• Our due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with product quality, product architecture, legal or tax contingencies, customer obligations and product development, among other things;

• As successor we may be subject to certain liabilities of our acquisition targets; and

• We may be required to sustain significant exit or impairment charges if products acquired in business combinations are unsuccessful.

Government contracts are subject to unique costs, terms, regulations, claims and penalties

          As a result of the Manugistics acquisition, we acquired a number of contracts with the government. Government contracts entail many unique risks, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) early termination of contracts by the Government; (ii) costly and complex competitive bidding process; (iii) required extensive use of subcontractors, whose work may be deficient or not performed in a timely manner; (iv) significant penalties associated with employee misconduct in the highly regulated Government marketplace; (v) changes or delays in Government funding that could negatively impact contracts; and (vi) onerous contractual provisions unique to the Government such as “most favored customer” provisions.

Risks Related To Our Industry

It may be difficult to identify, adopt and develop product architecture that is compatible with emerging industry standards

          The markets for our software products are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. We continuously evaluate new technologies and when appropriate implement into our products advanced technology such as our current JDA Enterprise Architecture platform effort. However, if we fail in our product development efforts to accurately address in a timely manner, evolving industry standards, new technology advancements or important third-party interfaces or product architectures, sales of our products and services may suffer.

          Our software products can be licensed with a variety of popular industry standard platforms and are authored in various development environments using different programming languages and underlying databases and architectures. There may be future or existing platforms that achieve popularity in the marketplace that may not be compatible with our software product design. Developing and maintaining consistent software product performance across various technology platforms could place a significant strain on our resources and software product release schedules, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We may be impacted by shifts in the consumer products supply and demand chain

          We are dependent upon and derive most of our revenue from the consumer products supply and demand chain vertical. If a shift in spending occurs in this vertical market that results in decreased demand for the types of solutions we sell, it would be difficult to adjust our strategies and solution offerings because of our dependence on this market. If the consumer products supply and demand chain vertical experiences a decline in business, it could have a significant adverse impact on our business prospects, particularly if it is a prolonged decline.

43

Risks Related To Our Stock

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, which could adversely affect the price of our stock

          Because of the difficulty in predicting the timing of particular sales within any one quarter, we provide annual guidance only. Our actual quarterly operating results have varied in the past and are expected to continue to vary in the future. Fluctuating quarterly results can affect our annual guidance. If our quarterly or annual operating results, particularly our software revenues, fail to meet management’s or analysts’ expectations, the price of our stock could decline. Many factors may cause these fluctuations, including:

• The difficulty of predicting demand for our software products and services, including the size and timing of individual contracts and our ability to recognize revenue with respect to contracts signed in a given quarter, particularly with respect to our larger customers;

• Changes in the length and complexity of our sales cycle, including changes in the contract approval process at our customers and potential customers that now require a formal proposal process, a longer decision making period and additional layers of customer approval, often including authorization of the transaction by senior executives, boards of directors and significant equity investors;

• Competitive pricing pressures and competitive success or failure on significant transactions;

• Customer order deferrals resulting from the anticipation of new products, economic uncertainty, disappointing operating results by the customer, management changes, corporate reorganizations or otherwise;

• The timing of new software product and technology introductions and enhancements to our software products or those of our competitors, and market acceptance of our new software products and technology;

• Lack of desired features and functionality in our individual products or our suite of products;

• Changes in the number, size or timing of new and renewal maintenance contracts or cancellations;

• Unplanned changes in our operating expenses;

• Changes in the mix of domestic and international revenues, or expansion or contraction of international operations;

• Our ability to complete fixed price consulting contracts within budget;

• Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;

• Lower-than-anticipated utilization in our consulting services group as a result of increased competition, reduced levels of software sales, reduced implementation times for our products, changes in the mix of demand for our software products, mergers and consolidations within our customer base, or other reasons; and

• Our limited ability to reduce costs in the short term to compensate for any unanticipated shortfall in product or services revenue.

          Charges to earnings resulting from past or future acquisitions or internal reorganizations may also adversely affect our operating results. Under purchase accounting, we allocate the total purchase price to an acquired company’s net tangible assets, amortizable intangible assets and in-process research and development based on their fair values as of the date of the acquisition and record the excess of the purchase price over those fair values as goodwill.  Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain.  As a result, any of the following or other factors could result in material charges that would adversely affect our results:

• Loss on impairment of goodwill and/or other intangible assets;

• Changes in the useful lives or the amortization of identifiable intangible assets;

• Accrual of newly identified pre-merger contingent liabilities, in which case the related charges could be required to be included in earnings in the period in which the accrual is determined to the extent it is identified subsequent to the finalization of the purchase price allocation;

• Charges to income to eliminate certain JDA pre-merger activities that duplicate those of the acquired company or to reduce our cost structure; and

• Changes in deferred tax assets and valuation allowances.

In addition, fluctuations in the price of our common stock may expose us to the risk of securities class action lawsuits. Defending against such lawsuits could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources. Furthermore, any settlement or adverse determination of these lawsuits could subject us to significant liabilities.

44

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and stockholders’ rights plan and Delaware law could prevent or delay a change in control

          Our certificate of incorporation, which authorizes the issuance of “blank check preferred” stock, our stockholders’ rights plan which permits our stockholders to counter takeover attempts, and Delaware state corporate laws which restrict business combinations between a corporation and 15% or more owners of outstanding voting stock of the corporation for a three-year period, individually or in combination, may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a JDA stockholder may consider favorable.

          We sold 50,000 shares of a new designated series of preferred stock (the “Series B Convertible Preferred Stock”) to funds affiliated with Thoma Cressey Bravo Equity Partners in connection with our acquisition of Manugistics Group, Inc. on July 5, 2006. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock contain certain voting rights that require us to get approval of a majority of the holders if we want to take certain actions, including a change in control. These voting rights could discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that another stockholder may consider favorable.

Our convertible preferred stock may adversely impact JDA and our common stockholders or have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

          The terms of the Series B Preferred Stock issued in connection with the acquisition of Manugistics may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference in the amount of $50 million plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, which must be paid before common stockholders would receive funds in the event of liquidation, including some changes of control and a redemption right after September 6, 2013 to receive a redemption value of $50 million. In addition, we are required to redeem the shares of the Series B Preferred Stock in certain circumstances, including a change in control. We have also agreed not to issue securities senior to or on a par with the Series B Preferred Stock while the Series B Preferred Stock is outstanding, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to raise additional funds.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds – Not applicable

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – Not applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information – Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits – See Exhibits Index

45

JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.

SIGNATURE

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Dated: May 12, 2008	By:	/s/ Kristen L. Magnuson
		Kristen L. Magnuson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

46

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit #		Description of Document
2.15 5 5	—	Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between JDA Software Group, Inc., Stanley Acquisition Corp. and Manugistics Group, Inc. dated April 24, 2006.
2.25 5 5	—	Voting Agreement by and among JDA Software Group, Inc., Manugistics Group, Inc. and other parties signatory thereto dated as of April 24, 2006.
3.1****	—	Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company together with Certificate of Amendment dated July 23, 2002.
3.2**	—	First Amended and Restated Bylaws of JDA Software Group, Inc.
3.35 5 5 5	—	Certificate of Designation of rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of JDA Software Group, Inc filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on July 5, 2006.
3.4††††	—	Certificate of Correction filed to correct a certain error in the Certificate of Designation of rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of JDA Software Group, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on July 5, 2006.
4.1*	—	Specimen Common Stock Certificate of JDA Software Group, Inc.
10.1*(1)	—	Form of Indemnification Agreement.
10.2¨¨ (1)	—	1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended on March 28, 2003.
10.3*(1)	—	1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and forms of agreement thereunder.
10.4¨¨ (1)	—	Executive Employment Agreement between James D. Armstrong and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated July 23, 2002, together with Amendment No. 1 effective August 1, 2003.
10.5¨¨ (1)	—	Executive Employment Agreement between Hamish N. Brewer and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated January 22, 2003, together with Amendment No. 1 effective August 1, 2003.
10.6 ****(1)	—	Executive Employment Agreement between Kristen L. Magnuson and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated July 23, 2002.
10.7¨¨ (1)	—	1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended on March 28, 2003.
10.95 5 5 5	—	Credit Agreement dated as of July 5, 2006, among JDA Software Group, Inc., Manugistics Group, Inc., Citicorp North America, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., UBS Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC and the Lenders named therein.
10.9.1***	—	Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated July 26, 2007, among JDA Software Group, Inc., Manugistics Group, Inc., Citicorp North America, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., UBS Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC and the Lenders named therein.
10.10¨¨ (2)	—	Value-Added Reseller License Agreement for Uniface Software between Compuware Corporation and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated April 1, 2000, together with Product Schedule No. One dated June 23, 2000, Product Schedule No. Two dated September 28, 2001, and Amendment to Product Schedule No. Two dated December 23, 2003.
10.11¨¨ (1)	—	JDA Software, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, adopted as amended effective January 1, 2004.
10.12**(1)	—	Form of Amendment of Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc and Kristen L. Magnuson, amending certain stock options granted to Ms. Magnuson pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan on September 11, 1997 and January 27, 1998.
10.13†(1)	—	Form of Rights Agreement between the Company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, as Rights Agent (including as Exhibit A the Form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the Form of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C the Summary of Terms and Rights Agreement).

47

Exhibit #		Description of Document
10.14††(1)	—	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and Kristen L. Magnuson to be used in connection with stock option grants to Ms. Magnuson pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.15¨(1)(3)	—	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and certain Senior Executive Officers to be used in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.16¨ (1)(3)	—	Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and certain Senior Executive Officers to be used in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.17¨ (1)(4)	—	Form of Amendment of Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc and certain Senior Executive Officers, amending certain stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.18¨ (1)(5)	—	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and certain Senior Executive Officers to be used in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.19††† (1)	—	Executive Employment Agreement between Christopher Koziol and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated June 13, 2005.
10.205 (1)	—	Restricted Stock Units Agreement between Christopher Koziol and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated November 3, 2005.
10.215 (1)	—	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock units granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.225 5 (1)	—	Standard Form of Restricted Stock Agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.235 5 (1)	—	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock granted to Hamish N. Brewer pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.245 5 (1)	—	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock granted to Kristen L. Magnuson pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.255 5 (1)	—	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement to be used in connection with restricted stock granted to Christopher J. Koziol pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.
10.265 5 5	—	Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement by and among JDA Software Group, Inc. and Funds Affiliated with Thoma Cressey Equity Partners Inc. dated as of April 23, 2006.
10.275 5 5	—	Registration Rights Agreement Between JDA Software Group, Inc. and Funds Affiliated With Thoma Cressey Equity Partners Inc. dated as of April 23, 2006.
14.1¨¨	—	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
21.1¨¨¨	—	Subsidiaries of Registrant.
31.1	—	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	—	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	—	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-748), declared effective on March 14, 1996.
**	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998, as filed on August 14, 1998.
***	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed on August 9, 2007.
****	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed on November 12, 2002.

48

†	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 1998, as filed on October 28, 1998.
††	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998, as filed on November 13, 1998.
†††	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 16, 2005, as filed on June 20, 2005.
††††	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed on November 9, 2006.
¨	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, as filed on March 16, 2000.
¨¨	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed on March 12, 2004.
¨¨¨	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed on March 14, 2008.
5	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 28, 2005, as filed on November 3, 2005.
5 5	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed on March 16, 2006.
5 5 5	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A (Amendment No. 1) dated April 24, 2006, as filed on April 27, 2006.
5 5 5 5	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 5, 2006, as filed on July 7, 2006.
(1)	Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements covering executive officers or directors of the Company.
(2)	Confidential treatment has been granted as to part of this exhibit.
(3)	Applies to James D. Armstrong.
(4)	Applies to Hamish N. Brewer.
(5)	Applies to Senior Executive Officers with the exception of James D. Armstrong and Kristen L. Magnuson.

49