a_fundstrust2ce2hf.htm

N-CSR 1 a_fundstrust2ce2hf.htm PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST a_fundstrust2ce2hf.htm



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: (811-07513)

Exact name of registrant as specified in charter:	Putnam Funds Trust

Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Name and address of agent for service:	Beth S. Mazor, Vice President
	One Post Office Square
	Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Copy to:	John W. Gerstmayr, Esq.
	Ropes & Gray LLP
	One International Place
	Boston, Massachusetts 02110

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(617) 292-1000

Date of fiscal year end: June 30, 2009

Date of reporting period: July 1, 2008— June 30, 2009

Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:

A BALANCED APPROACH

Since 1937, when George Putnam created a diverse mix of stocks and bonds in a single, professionally managed portfolio, Putnam has championed the balanced approach.

A WORLD OF INVESTING

Today, we offer investors a world of equity, fixed-income, multi-asset, and absolute-return portfolios to suit a range of financial goals.

A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE

Our portfolio managers seek superior results over time, backed by original, fundamental research on a global scale. We believe in the value of experienced financial advice, in providing exemplary service, and in putting clients first in all we do.

Putnam
International
Growth and
Income Fund

Annual Report
6 | 30 | 09


Message from the Trustees	1
About the fund	2
Performance and portfolio snapshots	4
Interview with your fund’s Portfolio Manager	5
Your fund’s performance	8
Your fund’s expenses	9
Terms and definitions	11
Trustee approval of management contract	12
Other information for shareholders	19
Financial statements	20
Federal tax information	35
About the Trustees	36
Officers	40

Message from the Trustees

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

Following many months of painful losses, the stock market reversed course in early March and has since posted substantial gains. Returns in the fixed-income area have been more mixed. After significant gains in late 2008, U.S. Treasuries have lost ground recently, while corporate, municipal, and high-yield bonds have rebounded from their historic lows. Markets can be volatile in both directions, and we believe the recent turnaround demonstrates the need for a disciplined, balanced approach to investing. We are pleased to report that, in many instances, Putnam mutual fund performance has been quite strong, reflecting the substantial efforts of an investment team infused with new talent and a singular focus.

Putnam Investments and the Board of Trustees continue to evolve during this time of renewal. After several years of steady leadership, Charles E. “Ed” Haldeman, Jr. has stepped down as President of the Putnam Funds and as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Funds. Effective July 2009, Robert L. Reynolds, President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments and a Trustee of the Putnam Funds, replaced Mr. Haldeman as President of the Putnam Funds.

In other developments, Walter C. Donovan, a 25-year investment industry veteran, has joined Putnam as Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Donovan will oversee a reinvigorated investment organization strengthened by the recent arrival of several industry-leading senior portfolio managers, research analysts, and traders. Ravi Akhoury has been elected to the Board of Trustees of the Putnam Funds, and W. Thomas Stephens has rejoined the Board. From 1992 to 2007, Mr. Akhoury was Chairman and CEO of MacKay Shields, a multi-product investment management firm with more than $40 billion in assets under management. Mr. Stephens retired in December 2008 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Boise Cascade, L.L.C., a paper, forest products, and timberland assets company.

We would like to take this opportunity to welcome new shareholders to the fund and to thank all of our investors for your continued confidence in Putnam.

About the fund

A value approach to international investing

Just as free trade has opened the U.S. economy to world imports in recent years, the world has also become more available to U.S. investors. New markets for equity investing were established as communist economies transitioned to capitalism, and investor-friendly reforms helped give investors greater transparency and sound legal footing.

Investing in companies located in different economic systems may provide your portfolio with valuable diversification, particularly during a downturn in the U.S. economy. International economies generally follow a different business cycle than that of the United States and may be growing while the U.S. economy is sluggish. Investing in securities denominated in foreign currencies provides further diversification. While the euro, the yen, and other currencies fluctuate in value, the fund can benefit when these currencies strengthen against the U.S. dollar.

Since 1996, Putnam International Growth and Income Fund has sought to benefit from positive changes taking place in companies outside the United States by investing mainly in stocks of large and midsize companies. The fund’s manager looks for financially strong companies that appear to be priced attractively and poised to experience positive changes. The goal is to identify companies that are undertaking new business strategies to compete in a dynamic global economy, or companies that are the beneficiaries of change, such as industry deregulation, privatization, corporate restructuring, and mergers.

To gather information about this wide variety of companies and markets, the manager is supported by the research of Putnam analysts based in Boston, London, and Singapore. In all decisions, the manager is guided by Putnam’s risk controls, which call for regular review of fund holdings and the discipline to sell stocks when they reach what is considered their true worth.

The fund seeks to combine the potential benefits of international investing with a value-driven approach so that it may successfully serve as the international portion of a broadly diversified portfolio.

Consider these risks before you invest: International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. Additional risks may be associated with emerging-market securities, including illiquidity and volatility. The fund invests some or all of its assets in small and/or midsize companies. Such investments increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Value investing seeks underpriced stocks, but there is no guarantee that a stock’s price will rise.

In-depth analysis is key to
successful stock selection.

Drawing on the expertise of a dedicated team of stock analysts, the fund’s manager seeks stocks that are believed to be underpriced by the market. Once a stock is selected for the portfolio, it is regularly assessed to ensure that it continues to meet certain criteria, including:

Quality The manager considers high-quality characteristics such as solid management and sound business models that create strong cash flows.

Valuation The manager carefully considers how each stock is valued, seeking stocks whose valuations are attractive relative to the company’s growth potential.

Cash flow The manager examines each company’s financials, particularly the amount of cash a company generates relative to the earnings that it reports, and targets those companies believed to offer attractive and sustainable cash flow.

Market integration and corporate strategies focused on shareholder value
have enhanced value investment opportunities since the fund launched in 1996.

Performance and
portfolio snapshots

Average annual total return (%) comparison as of 6/30/09

Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance of class A shares assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Fund returns in the bar chart do not reflect a sales charge of 5.75%; had they, returns would have been lower. See pages 5 and 8–9 for additional performance information. For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower. Due to market volatility, current performance may be higher or lower than performance shown. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply. To obtain the most recent month-end performance, visit putnam.com.

“We will likely see more concrete signs of economic
recovery — especially in the emerging markets —
6 to 12 months from now.”

Pamela Holding, Portfolio Manager, Putnam International Growth and
Income Fund

Country allocations as of 6/30/09

The top 10 country allocations represent 83.8% of the portfolio’s net assets and will
vary over time. The remaining net assets are allocated among 16 other countries.

Interview with your
fund’s Portfolio Manager

Pamela Holding

Pam, we’ve just come through 12 months of extraordinarily volatile markets. How did Putnam International Growth and Income Fund perform during this challenging period?

For the year ending June 30, 2009, the fund’s class A shares lost 37.76% at net asset value, compared with a 29.56% decline for the fund’s benchmark, the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Value Index. We also lagged the 32.21% average decline of our peers in the Lipper International Large-Cap Value Funds category. In the broadest terms, our stock selection worked against us — first because we weren’t positioned defensively enough going into the market collapse last fall, and then because our positioning wasn’t aggressive enough in the spring, when global stock markets began a sustained and vigorous rally.

Can you provide more details about the fund’s positioning?

In the fall, our performance shortfall versus the benchmark was concentrated in September and October, around the time of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. This fund has a value bias, which means I look for undervalued companies that I believe have potential catalysts that could drive their stocks higher. However, during the panic that followed Lehman’s failure — and investors’ recognition that many countries were following the United States into a recession — valuation was a poor predictor of performance because so many stocks that appeared inexpensive continued to sell off. Consequently, even though we began the period with underweight positions in the financials and consumer discretionary sectors, which helped when the markets were declining, unfavorable stock picking in those groups more than offset the benefits of underweighting them. Falling commodity prices hampered many of my picks in the materials and industrials sectors as well.

What affected performance during the second half of the period?

As the markets fell apart in late 2008, I moved the fund to a more defensive stance, boosting its exposure to sectors such as health care, consumer staples, and telecommunication services. These sectors tend to offer greater protection during periods of market volatility. My view was that the markets would likely remain choppy at least through the first-quarter earnings season, after which I thought we might see a decent rally. However, the massive efforts by financial authorities in the United States and abroad to add liquidity and jump-start

Broad market index and fund performance

This comparison shows your fund’s performance in the context of broad market indexes for the 12 months ended 6/30/09. See the previous page and pages 8–9 for additional fund performance information. Index descriptions can be found on page 11.

economic growth improved investor sentiment more rapidly than I anticipated. Moreover, companies across a broad range of industries reacted quickly in cutting costs and reducing inventories, resulting in better first-quarter revenue numbers than I expected. Consequently, many of the sectors and names I cut back on in the fall of 2008 did quite well between March and May of 2009. I responded to the improving environment by lessening the fund’s defensive tilt and adding to our holdings in financials and more cyclically sensitive sectors like energy and industrials. While these adjustments helped the fund participate in the rally, our gains lagged those of the benchmark.

IN THE NEWS

Many analysts believe that emerging-market stocks may be in the midst of a “long-term secular bull market” similar to the growth of U.S. equities during the post-World War II era. In the first half of 2009, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index surged more than 40% on speculation that interest-rate cuts and stimulus packages in countries like India, China, and Brazil would trigger economic growth. Given that 85% of the world’s population live in developing countries, the expanding wealth of these citizens is a potential powerful driver of future growth.

What were some holdings that hurt performance?

Two diversified mining companies, Switzerland-based Xstrata and U.K. holding Anglo American, were the biggest detractors during the period. Falling prices for copper, iron ore, coal, and other industrial commodities led us to sell both positions by the end of 2008. Later in the period, with the rally in progress, we bought back Xstrata. Similarly, in the first half of the period we liquidated our positions in two commodity-sensitive trading companies based in Japan, Mitsubishi Corp. and Marubeni, both of which detracted from performance. In the spring, amid stronger commodity prices, we rebuilt a position in Mitsubishi.

Several positions in U.K. banks also worked against us. There, the most notable detractors were Royal Bank of Scotland and Allied Irish Banks. Housing bubbles in Scotland and Ireland, along with soured investments in risky securitized assets, saddled both companies with huge losses and, in the case of Royal Bank of Scotland, led the British government to take a majority stake in the company. As a result, we sold the two holdings before the end of the period.

Which holdings added value in this environment?

Although financial stocks detracted from the fund’s overall performance, several Canadian holdings in that sector were key contributors, including property and casualty insurer Fairfax Financial Holdings and National Bank of Canada. Our success with Fairfax was due to several factors, including the

Top 10 equity holdings


HOLDING (percentage of fund’s net assets)	COUNTRY	SECTOR/INDUSTRY

Banco Santander Central Hispano SA (4.1%)	Spain	Financials/Banking
BP PLC (3.8%)	United Kingdom	Energy/Oil and gas
Nestle SA (2.5%)	Switzerland	Consumer staples/Food
Roche Holding AG (2.0%)	Switzerland	Health care/Pharmaceuticals
National Bank of Canada (2.0%)	Canada	Financials/Banking
Total SA (1.9%)	France	Energy/Oil and gas
BNP Paribas SA (1.7%)	France	Financials/Banking
Vodafone Group PLC (1.7%)	United Kingdom	Communication services/Telecommunications
AXA SA (1.6%)	France	Financials/Insurance
Royal Bank of Canada (1.6%)	Canada	Financials/Banking

This table shows the fund’s top 10 holdings and the percentage of the fund’s net assets that each represented as of 6/30/09. Holdings will vary over time.

company’s relatively solid balance sheet and favorable timing on our part in acquiring the shares before they rallied, and then selling them in early 2009 to lock in profits. I continued to hold National Bank of Canada, which benefited from the Canadian government’s plan to buy toxic assets from bank balance sheets. I’ll also mention Spanish bank Banco Santander Central Hispano SA, the fund’s largest holding on an absolute basis and also its largest overweight position relative to the benchmark as of period-end. This longtime holding was aided by its healthy balance sheet and its exposure to the vibrant economies of Brazil and other Latin American nations. Elsewhere, an out-of-benchmark position in U.K. consumer products company Reckitt Benckiser Group, which I like to think of as the British version of Procter & Gamble, added value. The company’s recession-resistant product line and its effectiveness in marketing its products were factors lifting the stock.

What is your outlook as we enter the second half of 2009?

I’m somewhat cautious about the stock market’s near-term prospects but more optimistic about what might be in store over the next 6 to 12 months. My caution stems from how quickly the markets have risen in the absence of any convincing signs that the economies in the fund’s universe are bottoming. The markets will likely need to see some favorable economic and corporate earnings data in order to make further upside progress. Having said that, we will likely see more concrete signs of economic recovery — especially in emerging markets — 6 to 12 months from now. Given that view, I’ve positioned the fund in a number of companies that have direct exposure to emerging markets or can benefit indirectly as part of a supply chain that ultimately serves emerging-market end users. I am also bullish about the longer-term outlook for commodity prices and, therefore, have tried to give the fund solid representation in companies positioned to benefit from that trend. However, most of the fund’s sector and country weightings at period-end are fairly close to those of the benchmark, as I monitor the markets through this period of uncertainty.

Thank you, Pam, for your time and insights.

The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.

Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.

Pamela Holding is a Portfolio Manager at Putnam. She has an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and an A.B. from Princeton University. A CFA charterholder, she joined Putnam in 1995 and has been in the investment industry since 1988.

Pamela may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.

Comparison of top sector weightings

This chart shows how the fund’s top weightings have changed over the past six months. Weightings are shown as a percentage of net assets. Holdings will vary over time.

Your fund’s performance

This section shows your fund’s performance, price, and distribution information for periods ended June 30, 2009, the end of its most recent fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include expense information taken from the fund’s current prospectus. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance information does not reflect any deduction for taxes a shareholder may owe on fund distributions or on the redemption of fund shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit the Individual Investors section of putnam.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs. See the Terms and Definitions section in this report for definitions of the share classes offered by your fund.

Fund performance Total return for periods ended 6/30/09


	Class A		Class B		Class C		Class M		Class R	Class Y
(inception dates)	(8/1/96)		(8/1/96)		(2/1/99)		(8/1/96)		(12/1/03)	(10/2/00)

	NAV	POP	NAV	CDSC	NAV	CDSC	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV

Annual average (life of fund)	4.69%	4.21%	3.90%	3.90%	3.93%	3.93%	4.17%	3.89%	4.44%	4.89%

10 years	8.61	2.35	0.62	0.62	1.03	1.03	3.40	-0.26	6.01	11.32
Annual average	0.83	0.23	0.06	0.06	0.10	0.10	0.33	-0.03	0.59	1.08

5 years	0.10	–5.62	–3.65	–5.13	–3.55	–3.55	–2.32	–5.78	–1.14	1.34
Annual average	0.02	–1.15	–0.74	–1.05	–0.72	–0.72	–0.47	–1.18	–0.23	0.27

3 years	–31.08	–35.03	–32.65	–34.22	–32.58	–32.58	–32.06	–34.42	–31.56	–30.57
Annual average	–11.67	–13.39	–12.34	–13.03	–12.31	–12.31	–12.09	–13.12	–11.87	–11.45

1 year	–37.76	–41.36	–38.24	–41.33	–38.16	–38.78	–38.06	–40.22	–37.90	–37.62

Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. After-sales-charge returns (public offering price, or POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum 5.75% and 3.50% load, respectively. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year that is eliminated thereafter. Class R and Y shares have no initial sales charge or CDSC. Performance for class B, C, M, R, and Y shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class A shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, except for class Y shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares.

For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.

Due to market volatility, current performance may be higher or lower than performance shown.

A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 90 days of purchase.

Change in the value of a $10,000 investment ($9,425 after sales charge) Cumulative total return from 6/30/99 to 6/30/09

Past performance does not indicate future results. At the end of the same time period, a $10,000 investment in the fund’s class B and class C shares would have been valued at $10,062 and $10,103, respectively, and no contingent deferred sales charges would apply. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class M shares ($9,650 after sales charge) would have been valued at $9,974 at public offering price. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class R and class Y shares would have been valued at $10,601 and $11,132, respectively.

Comparative index returns For periods ended 6/30/09


	S&P Developed Ex-U.S.	Lipper International Large-Cap Value
	LargeMidCap Value Index	Funds category average*

Annual average (life of fund)	5.23%	4.88%

10 years	41.00	33.51
Annual average	3.50	2.71

5 years	21.72	8.00
Annual average	4.01	1.50

3 years	–18.72	–24.96
Annual average	-6.68	-9.19

1 year	–29.56	–32.21

Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.

* Over the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 6/30/09, there were 143, 106, 86, 46, and 30 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.

Fund price and distribution information For the 12-month period ended 6/30/09


Distributions	Class A		Class B	Class C	Class M		Class R	Class Y

Number	1		—	1	1		1	1

Income	$0.1234		—	$0.0178	$0.0405		$0.1105	$0.1609

Capital gains	—		—	—	—		—	—

Return of capital*	0.0016		—	0.0002	0.0005		0.0015	0.0021

Total	$0.1250		—	$0.0180	$0.0410		$0.1120	$0.1630

Share value	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV

6/30/08	$12.54	$13.31	$12.29	$12.37	$12.47	$12.92	$12.40	$12.61

6/30/09	7.67	8.14	7.59	7.63	7.68	7.96	7.58	7.69

The classification of distributions, if any, is an estimate. Final distribution information will appear on your year-end tax forms.

* See page 35.

Your fund’s expenses

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the following information, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial representative.

Expense ratios For the fiscal year ended 6/30/08


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Your fund’s total annual fund operating expenses	1.30%	2.05%	2.05%	1.80%	1.55%	1.05%

Expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown in the next section and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.

Expenses per $1,000

The following table shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam International Growth and Income Fund from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2009. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Expenses paid per $1,000*	$6.68	$10.42	$10.42	$9.18	$7.93	$5.43

Ending value (after expenses)	$1,025.40	$1,020.20	$1,021.40	$1,022.60	$1,024.30	$1,026.70

Your fund’s annualized expense ratio†	1.33%	2.08%	2.08%	1.83%	1.58%	1.08%

* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 6/30/09. The expense ratio may differ for each share class. Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.

† For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights.

Estimate the expenses you paid

To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended June 30, 2009, use the following calculation method. To find the value of your investment on January 1, 2009, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.

Compare expenses using the SEC’s method

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the following table shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Expenses paid per $1,000*	$6.66	$10.39	$10.39	$9.15	$7.90	$5.41

Ending value (after expenses)	$1,018.20	$1,014.48	$1,014.48	$1,015.72	$1,016.96	$1,019.44

Your fund’s annualized expense ratio†	1.33%	2.08%	2.08%	1.83%	1.58%	1.08%

† For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights.

Terms and definitions

Important terms

Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.

Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.

Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 5.75% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.50% for class M shares.

Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.

Share classes

Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).

Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.

Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.

Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).

Class R shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC and are available only to certain defined contribution plans.

Class Y shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC, and carry no 12b-1 fee. They are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.

Comparative indexes

Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.

Merrill Lynch U.S. 3-Month Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.

S&P Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Value Index is an unmanaged index of mostly large- and some small-cap stocks from developed countries, excluding the United States, chosen for their value orientation.

S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.

Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.

Trustee approval of management contract

General conclusions

The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Investment Management (“Putnam Management”) and the sub-management contract, with respect to your fund, between Putnam Management and its affiliate, Putnam Investments Limited (“PIL”), and the sub-advisory contract among Putnam Management, PIL and another affiliate, Putnam Advisory Company (“PAC”).

In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2009, the Contract Committee met several times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this information with all of the Independent Trustees. At the Trustees’ June 12, 2009 meeting, the Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management, sub-management and sub-advisory contracts, effective July 1, 2009. (Because PIL and PAC are affiliates of Putnam Management and Putnam Management remains fully responsible for all services provided by PIL and PAC, the Trustees have not evaluated PIL and PAC as separate entities, except as otherwise indicated below, and all subsequent references to Putnam Management below should be deemed to include reference to PIL and PAC as necessary or appropriate in the context.)

The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:

• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and

• That such fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.

These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees, were subject to the continued application of certain expense reductions and waivers pending other considerations noted below, and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.

Consideration of strategic
pricing proposal

The Trustees considered that the Contract Committee had been engaged in a detailed review of Putnam Management’s strategic pricing proposal that was first presented to the Committee at its May 2009 meeting. The proposal included proposed changes to the basic structure of the management fees in place for all open-end funds (except the Putnam RetirementReady® Funds and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund), including implementation of a breakpoint structure based on the aggregate net assets of all such funds in lieu of the individual breakpoint structures in place for each fund, as well as implementation of performance fees for certain funds. In addition, the proposal recommended substituting separate expense limitations on investor servicing fees and on other expenses as a group in lieu of the total expense limitations in place for many funds.

While the Contract Committee noted the likelihood that the Trustees and Putnam Management would reach agreement on the strategic pricing matters in later months, the terms of the management contracts required that the Trustees approve the continuance of the contracts in order to prevent their expiration at June 30, 2009. The Contract Committee’s recommendations in June reflect its conclusion that the terms of the contractual arrangements for your fund continued to be appropriate for the upcoming term, absent any possible agreement with respect to the matters addressed in Putnam Management’s proposal.

structure of the funds’ contractual arrangements with Putnam Management with a view to possible changes that might better serve the interests of shareholders in this new environment. The Trustees concluded their review of Putnam Management’s strategic pricing proposal in July 2009, and their considerations regarding the proposal are discussed below under the heading “Subsequent approval of strategic pricing proposal.” With the exception of the discussion under this heading, the following discussion generally addresses only the Trustees’ reasons for recommending the continuance of the current contractual arrangements as, at the time the Trustees determined to make this recommendation, the Trustees had not yet reached any conclusions with respect to the strategic pricing proposal.

Management fee schedules and
categories; total expenses

The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. The general fee structure has been carefully developed over the years and re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. In this regard, the Trustees noted that shareholders of all funds voted by overwhelming majorities in 2007 to approve new management contracts containing identical fee schedules.

In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund at that time but, as indicated above, based on their detailed review of the current fee structure, were prepared to consider possible changes to this arrangement that might better serve the interests of shareholders in the future. The Trustees focused on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:

• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 31st percentile in management fees and in the 28th percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2008 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds).

The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for management and administrative services, distribution (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints. The Trustees expressed their intention to monitor the funds’ percentile rankings in management fees and in total expenses to ensure that fees and expenses of the funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards.

The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were being controlled by expense limitations initially implemented in January 2004. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception and, while the Contract Committee was reviewing proposed alternative expense limitation arrangements as noted above, the Trustees received a commitment from Putnam Management and its parent company to continue this program through at least June 30, 2010, or such earlier time as the Trustees and Putnam Management reach agreement on alternative arrangements.

In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to extend for the twelve months beginning July 1, 2009, or until such earlier time as the Trustees and Putnam Management reach agreement on alternative expense limitation arrangements, an additional expense limitation for certain funds at an amount equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper to correspond to the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2007. This additional expense limitation was not applied to your fund because it had a below-average expense ratio relative to its custom peer group.

• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of the fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as the fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as the fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at that time but, as noted above, were in the process of reviewing a proposal to eliminate individual fund breakpoints for all of the open-end funds (except for the Putnam RetirementReady® Funds and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund) in favor of a breakpoint structure based on the aggregate net assets of all such funds.

trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis.

Investment performance

The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Oversight Coordinating Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which had met on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognized that this does not guarantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.

The Trustees noted the disappointing investment performance of many of the funds for periods ended December 31, 2008. They discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperformance and the actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has taken steps to strengthen its investment personnel and processes to address areas of underperformance, including Putnam Management’s continuing efforts to strengthen the equity research function, recent changes in portfolio managers including increased accountability of individual managers rather than teams, recent changes in Putnam Management’s approach to incentive compensation, including emphasis on top quartile performance over a rolling three-year period, and the recent arrival of a new chief investment officer. The Trustees also recognized the substantial improvement in performance of many funds since the implementation of those changes. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of these efforts and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of underperformance are warranted.

In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper International Large-Cap Value Funds) for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2009 (the first percentile being the best-performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst-performing funds):


One-year period	77th

Three-year period	77th

Five-year period	77th

Over the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2009, there were 93, 62 and 54 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The Trustees noted the disappointing performance for certain funds, as well as certain circumstances that may have contributed to that performance and the actions taken by Putnam Management to address these funds’ performance, as detailed below. The Trustees also considered the four broad initiatives that Putnam Management has implemented to improve its investment approach, to reduce the likelihood of fourth quartile results, and to deliver on its long-term investment goals. Specifically, Putnam Management has:

1. Increased accountability and reduced complexity in the portfolio management process for the Putnam equity funds by replacing a team management structure with a decision-making process that vests full authority and responsibility with individual portfolio managers;

2. Clarified Putnam Management’s investment process by affirming a fundamental-driven approach to investing, with quantitative analysis providing additional input for investment decisions;

3. Strengthened Putnam Management’s large-cap equity research capability by adding multiple new investment personnel to the team and by bringing U.S. and international research under common leadership; and

4.Realigned compensation structure for portfolio managers and research analysts so that only those who achieve top-quartile returns over a rolling three-year basis are eligible for full bonuses.

The Trustees noted the disappointing performance for your fund for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2009. In this regard, in addition to initiatives 1 through 4 described above, the Trustees considered that in November 2008, an existing portfolio manager took over sole responsibility for managing the fund’s investments.

As a general matter, the Trustees believe that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Putnam Management to address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would

entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.

Brokerage and soft-dollar
allocations; other benefits

The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees considered a change made, at Putnam Management’s request, to the Putnam funds’ brokerage allocation policy commencing in 2009, which increased the permitted soft dollar allocation to third-party services over what had been authorized in previous years. The Trustees noted that a portion of available soft dollars continue to be allocated to the payment of fund expenses, although the amount allocated for this purpose has declined in recent years. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor regulatory developments in this area with the assistance of their Brokerage Committee and also indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage and trends in industry practice to ensure that the principle of seeking best price and execution remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.

The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract also included the review of the investor servicing agreement with Putnam Investor Services, Inc. (“PSERV”), which agreement provides benefits to an affiliate of Putnam Management. The Trustees considered that effective January 1, 2009, the Trustees, PSERV and Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”) entered into a new fee schedule that includes for the open-end funds (other than funds of Putnam Variable Trust and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund) an expense limitation but, as noted above, also considered that this expense limitation is subject to review as part of the Trustees’ pending review of Putnam’s strategic pricing proposal.

In the case of your fund, the Trustees’ annual review of the fund’s management contract also included the review of the fund’s distributor’s contract and distribution plans with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, which contract and plans also provide benefits to an affiliate of Putnam Management.

Comparison of retail and
institutional fee schedules

The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparisons of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and mutual funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across different asset classes are typically higher on average for mutual funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.

Subsequent approval of strategic
pricing proposal

As mentioned above, at a series of meetings beginning in May 2009 and ending on July 10, 2009, the Contract Committee and the Trustees engaged in a detailed review of Putnam Management’s strategic pricing proposal. Following this review, the Trustees of each fund, including all of the Independent Trustees, voted unanimously on July 10, 2009 to approve proposed management contracts reflecting the proposal, as modified based on discussions between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, for each fund. In considering the proposed contracts, the Independent Trustees focused largely on the specific proposed changes described below relating to management fees. They also took into account the factors that they considered in connection with their most recent annual approval on June 12, 2009 of the continuance of the funds’ current management contracts and the extensive materials that they had reviewed in connection with that approval process, as described above.

The proposed management contracts are subject to shareholder approval. The Trustees have called a shareholder meeting for each of the funds for November 19, 2009 and have recommended unanimously that shareholders approve the proposed contracts.

Family. (“Fund Family” for purposes of this discussion refers to all open-end mutual funds sponsored by Putnam Management, except for the Putnam RetirementReady® Funds and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund.) Under the proposed management contracts, potential economies of scale would be shared ratably among shareholders of all funds, regardless of their size. The management fees paid by a fund (and indirectly by shareholders) would no longer be affected by the growth (or decline) of assets of the particular fund, but rather would be affected solely by the growth (or decline) of the aggregate net assets of all funds in the Fund Family, regardless of whether the net assets of the particular fund are growing or declining.

The table below shows the proposed effective management fee rate for your fund, based on June 30, 2009 net assets of the Fund Family ($52.3 billion). This table also shows the effective management fee rate payable by your fund under its current management contract, based on the net assets of the fund as of June 30, 2009. Finally, this table shows the difference in the effective management fees, based on net assets as of June 30, 2009, between the proposed management contract and the current contract.


Name of Fund	Proposed Effective Contractual Rate	Current Effective Contractual Rate	Difference

Putnam International Growth and Income Fund	0.712%	0.800%	(0.088%)

As shown in the foregoing table, based on June 30, 2009 net asset levels, the proposed management contract would provide for payment of a management fee rate that is lower for your fund than the management fee rate payable under the current management contract. For a small number of funds (although not your fund), the management fee rate would be slightly higher under the proposed contract at these asset levels, but by only immaterial amounts. In the aggregate, the financial impact on Putnam Management of implementing this proposed change for all funds at June 30, 2009 net asset levels is a reduction in annual management fee revenue of approximately $24.0 million. (Putnam Management has already incurred a significant portion of this revenue reduction through the waiver of a portion of its current management fees for certain funds pending shareholder consideration of the proposed management contracts. Putnam is not obliged to continue such waivers beyond July 31, 2010 in the event that the proposed contracts are not approved by shareholders.) The Independent Trustees carefully considered the implications of this proposed change under a variety of economic circumstances. They considered the fact that at current asset levels the management fees paid by the funds under the proposed contract would be lower for almost all funds, and would not be materially higher for any fund. They considered the possibility that under some circumstances, the current management contract could result in a lower fee for a particular fund than the proposed management contract. Such circumstances might occur, for example, if the aggregate net assets of the Fund Family remain largely unchanged and the net assets of an individual fund grew substantially, or if the net assets of an individual fund remain largely unchanged and the aggregate net assets of the Fund Family declined substantially.

The Independent Trustees noted that future changes in the net assets of individual funds are inherently unpredictable and that experience has shown that funds often grow in size and decline in size over time depending on market conditions and the changing popularity of particular investment styles and asset classes. They noted that, while the aggregate net assets of the Fund Family have changed substantially over time, basing a management fee on the aggregate level of assets of the Fund Family would likely reduce fluctuations in costs paid by individual funds and lead to greater stability and predictability of fund operating costs over time.

The Independent Trustees considered that the proposed management contract would likely be advantageous for newly organized funds that have yet to attract significant assets and for funds in specialty asset classes that are unlikely to grow to a significant size. In each case, such funds would participate in the benefits of scale made possible by the aggregate size of the Fund Family to an extent that would not be possible based solely on their individual size.

The Independent Trustees also considered that for funds that have achieved or are likely to achieve considerable scale on their own, the proposed management contract could result in sharing of economies which might lead to slightly higher costs under some circumstances, but they noted that any such increases are immaterial at current asset levels and that over time such funds are likely to realize offsetting benefits from their opportunity to participate, both through the exchange privilege and through the Fund Family breakpoint fee structure, in the improved growth prospects of a diversified Fund Family able to offer competitively priced products.

The Independent Trustees noted that the implementation of the proposed management contracts would result in a reduction in aggregate fee revenues for Putnam Management at current asset levels. They also noted that applying various projections of growth equally to the aggregate net assets of the Fund Family and to the net assets of individual funds also showed revenue reductions for Putnam Management. They recognized, however, the possibility that under some scenarios Putnam Management might realize greater future revenues, with respect to certain funds, under the proposed contracts than under the current contracts, but considered such circumstances to be both less likely and inherently unpredictable.

The Independent Trustees considered the extent to which Putnam Management may realize economies of scale in connection with the management of the funds. In this

regard, they considered the possibility that such economies of scale as may exist in the management of mutual funds may be associated more closely with the size of the aggregate assets of the mutual fund complex than with the size of any individual fund. In this regard the Independent Trustees considered the financial information provided to them by Putnam Management over a period of many years regarding the allocation of costs involved in calculating the profitability of its mutual fund business as a whole and the profitability of individual funds. The Independent Trustees noted that the methodologies for such cost allocations had been reviewed on a number of occasions in the past by independent financial consultants engaged by the Independent Trustees. The Independent Trustees noted that these methodologies support Putnam Management’s assertion that many of its operating costs and any associated economies of scale are related more to the aggregate net assets under management in various sectors of its business than to the size of individual funds. They noted that on a number of occasions in the past the Independent Trustees had separately considered the possibility of calculating management fees in whole or in part based on aggregate net assets of the Putnam funds.

The Independent Trustees considered the fact that the proposed contracts would result in a sharing among the affected funds of economies of scale that for the most part are now enjoyed by the larger funds, without materially increasing the current costs of any of the larger funds. They concluded that this sharing of economies among funds was appropriate in light of the diverse investment opportunities available to shareholders of all funds through the existence of the exchange privilege. They also considered that the proposed change in management fee structure would allow Putnam Management to introduce new investment products at more attractive pricing levels than may be currently be the case.

After considering all of the foregoing, the Independent Trustees concluded that the proposed calculation of management fees based on the aggregate net assets of the Fund Family represented a fair and reasonable means of sharing possible economies of scale among the shareholders of all funds.

• Considerations relating to addition of fee rate adjustments based on investment performance for certain funds. The Independent Trustees considered that Putnam’s proposal to add fee rate adjustments based on investment performance to the management contracts of certain funds reflected a desire by Putnam Management to align its fee revenues more closely with investment performance in the case of certain funds. They noted that Putnam Management already has a significant financial interest in achieving good performance results for the funds it manages. Putnam Management’s fees are based on the assets under its management (whether calculated on an individual fund or complex-wide basis). Good performance results in higher asset levels and therefore higher revenues to Putnam Management. Moreover, good performance also tends to attract additional investors to particular funds or the complex generally, also resulting in higher revenues. Nevertheless, the Independent Trustees concluded that adjusting management fees based on performance for certain selected funds could provide additional benefits to shareholders.

The Independent Trustees noted that Putnam Management proposed the addition of performance adjustments only for certain of the funds and considered whether similar adjustments might be appropriate for other funds. In this regard, they considered Putnam Management’s belief that the addition of performance adjustments would be most appropriate for shareholders of U.S. growth funds, international equity funds, including your fund, and Putnam Global Equity Fund. They also considered Putnam Management’s view that it would continue to monitor whether performance fees would be appropriate for other funds. Accordingly, the Independent Trustees concluded that it would be desirable to gain further experience with the operation of performance adjustments for certain funds and the market’s receptivity to such fee structures before giving further consideration to whether similar performance adjustments would be appropriate for other funds as well.

• Considerations relating to standardization of payment terms. The proposed management contracts for all funds provide that management fees will be computed and paid monthly within 15 days after the end of each month. The current contracts of the funds contain quarterly computation and payment terms in some cases. These differences largely reflect practices in place at earlier times when many of the funds were first organized. Under the proposed contract, certain funds would make payments to Putnam Management earlier than they do under their current contract. This would reduce a fund’s opportunity to earn income on accrued but unpaid management fees by a small amount, but would not have a material effect on a fund’s operating costs.

The Independent Trustees considered the fact that standardizing the payment terms for all funds would involve an acceleration in the timing of payments to Putnam Management for some funds and a corresponding loss of a potential opportunity for such funds to earn income on accrued but unpaid management fees. The Independent Trustees did not view this change as having a material impact on shareholders of any fund. In this regard, the Independent Trustees noted that the proposed contracts conform to the payment terms included in management contracts for all Putnam funds organized in recent years and that standardizing payment terms across all funds would reduce administrative burdens for both the funds and Putnam Management.

• Considerations relating to comparisons with management fees and total expenses of competitive funds. As part of their evaluation of the proposed management contracts, the Independent Trustees also reviewed the general approach taken by Putnam Management and the Independent Trustees in recent years in imposing appropriate limits on total fund expenses. As part of the annual contract review process in recent years, Putnam Management agreed

to waive fees as needed to limit total fund expenses to a maximum level equal to the average total expenses of comparable competitive funds in the mutual fund industry. In connection with its proposal to implement new management contracts, Putnam Management also proposed, and the Independent Trustees approved, certain changes in this approach that shift the focus from controlling total expenses to imposing separate limits on certain categories of expenses, as required. As a general matter, Putnam Management and the Independent Trustees concluded that management fees for the Putnam funds are competitive with the fees charged by comparable funds in the industry. Nevertheless, the Independent Trustees considered specific management fee waivers proposed to be implemented as of August 1, 2009 by Putnam Management with respect to the current management fees of certain funds, as well as projected reductions in management fees for almost all funds that would result under the proposed contracts. Putnam Management and the Independent Trustees also agreed to impose separate expense limitations of 37.5 basis points on the general category of shareholder servicing expenses and 20 basis points on the general category of other ordinary operating expenses. These new expense limitations, as well as the fee waivers, were implemented for all funds effective as of August 1, 2009, replacing the expense limitation referred to above.

These changes resulted in lower total expenses for many funds, but in the case of some funds total expenses increased after application of the new waivers and expense limitations (as compared with the results obtained using the expense limitation method previously in place). In this regard, the Independent Trustees considered the likelihood that total expenses for most of these funds would have increased in any event in the normal course under the previous expense limitation arrangement, as the reported total expense levels of many competitive funds increased in response to the major decline in asset values that began in September 2008. These new waivers and expense limitations will continue in effect until at least July 31, 2010 and will be re-evaluated by the Independent Trustees as part of the annual contract review process prior to their scheduled expiration. However, the management fee waivers referred to above would largely become permanent reductions in fees as a result of the implementation of the proposed management contracts.

Under these new expense limitation arrangements effective August 1, 2009, your fund is subject to expense limitations of 37.5 basis points on the category of shareholder servicing fees and 20 basis points on the general category of other ordinary operating expenses.

Other information for shareholders

Putnam’s policy on confidentiality

In order to conduct business with our shareholders, we must obtain certain personal information such as account holders’ addresses, telephone numbers, Social Security numbers, and the names of their financial representatives. We use this information to assign an account number and to help us maintain accurate records of transactions and account balances. It is our policy to protect the confidentiality of your information, whether or not you currently own shares of our funds, and, in particular, not to sell information about you or your accounts to outside marketing firms. We have safeguards in place designed to prevent unauthorized access to our computer systems and procedures to protect personal information from unauthorized use. Under certain circumstances, we share this information with outside vendors who provide services to us, such as mailing and proxy solicitation. In those cases, the service providers enter into confidentiality agreements with us, and we provide only the information necessary to process transactions and perform other services related to your account. We may also share this information with our Putnam affiliates to service your account or provide you with information about other Putnam products or services. It is also our policy to share account information with your financial representative, if you’ve listed one on your Putnam account. If you would like clarification about our confidentiality policies or have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact us at 1-800-225-1581, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., or Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Proxy voting

Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2009, are available in the Individual Investors section at putnam.com, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.

Fund portfolio holdings

The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.

Trustee and employee
fund ownership

Putnam employees and members of the Board of Trustees place their faith, confidence, and, most importantly, investment dollars in Putnam mutual funds. As of June 30, 2009, Putnam employees had $358,000,000 and the Trustees had $31,000,000 invested in Putnam mutual funds. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members as well as investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.

Financial statements

These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, preceded by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, constitute the fund’s financial statements.

The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.

Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For the funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets include the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)

Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal year.

Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned.

Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of Putnam Funds Trust and Shareholders of
Putnam International Growth and Income Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Putnam International Growth and Income Fund (the “fund”) at June 30, 2009, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of investments owned at June 30, 2009 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 12, 2009

The fund’s portfolio 6/30/09


COMMON STOCKS (98.0%)*	Shares	Value

Aerospace and defense (0.9%)
BAE Systems PLC (United Kingdom)	590,651	$3,298,837

		3,298,837
Airlines (1.9%)
Qantas Airways, Ltd. (Australia)	927,356	1,498,577

Singapore Airlines, Ltd. (Singapore)	556,540	5,099,843

		6,598,420
Automotive (4.4%)
Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd. (Japan)	104,400	2,257,558

Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW)
AG (Germany)	46,479	1,756,816

Fiat SpA (Italy) †	275,133	2,793,432

Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Japan)	111,800	3,061,053

Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Japan)	947,700	5,721,200

		15,590,059
Banking (19.6%)
Banco Santander Central Hispano SA (Spain)	1,204,997	14,553,803

Bank of China Ltd. (China)	5,228,000	2,477,279

Barclays PLC (United Kingdom)	549,807	2,562,254

BNP Paribas SA (France)	90,638	5,886,673

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Australia)	94,334	2,954,674

DnB NOR ASA (Norway) †	277,727	2,127,724

HSBC Holdings PLC (London Exchange)
(United Kingdom)	537,869	4,467,627

Industrial & Commercial Bank of
China (China)	4,836,000	3,358,564

Julius Baer Holding, Ltd.
Class B (Switzerland)	37,298	1,455,922

KBC Groupe SA (Belgium) †	89,711	1,637,891

Lloyds Banking Group PLC (United Kingdom)	1,461,963	1,683,420

National Bank of Canada (Canada)	148,367	6,865,295

National Bank of Greece SA (Greece) †	122,005	3,345,457

Royal Bank of Canada (Canada) ^S	140,200	5,741,489

Societe Generale (France) ^S	50,884	2,778,480

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (Japan)	72,700	2,939,718

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
144A (Japan)	17,700	715,722

Toronto-Dominion Bank (Canada) ^S	62,100	3,212,456

		68,764,448
Broadcasting (0.4%)
Gestevision Telecinco SA (Spain)	148,098	1,390,243

		1,390,243
Chemicals (1.4%)
Nitto Denko Corp. (Japan)	75,800	2,296,731

Syngenta AG (Switzerland)	11,331	2,634,252

		4,930,983
Commercial and consumer services (3.7%)
Companhia Brasileira de Meios de Pagamento
144A (Brazil)	38,700	332,905

Compass Group PLC (United Kingdom)	665,797	3,753,810

Guangdong Investment, Ltd. (China)	4,166,000	2,045,754

LG Corp. (South Korea)	60,909	2,897,295

Michael Page International PLC
(United Kingdom)	585,759	2,311,779

TUI Travel PLC (United Kingdom)	446,528	1,708,204

		13,049,747
Computers (1.9%)
Fujitsu, Ltd. (Japan)	689,000	3,733,316

Longtop Financial Technologies Ltd.
ADR (China) †	49,100	1,205,896

Wincor Nixdorf AG (Germany)	29,776	1,671,161

		6,610,373


COMMON STOCKS (98.0%)* cont.	Shares	Value

Conglomerates (2.2%)
Mitsubishi Corp. (Japan)	93,200	$1,711,546

Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (Japan)	237,500	2,797,721

Vivendi SA (France)	133,947	3,211,238

		7,720,505
Consumer finance (0.3%)
Credit Saison Co., Ltd. (Japan)	81,400	1,027,795

		1,027,795
Consumer goods (1.5%)
Kao Corp. (Japan)	133,000	2,898,358

Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (United Kingdom)	49,786	2,270,192

		5,168,550
Containers (—%)
Rexam PLC (United Kingdom)	2,014	9,459

		9,459
Distribution (0.4%)
Jardine Cycle & Carriage, Ltd. (Singapore)	105,000	1,390,125

		1,390,125
Electric utilities (1.9%)
CEZ AS (Czech Republic)	51,223	2,311,716

E.ON AG (Germany)	49,941	1,774,077

RWE AG (Germany)	30,710	2,426,373

		6,512,166
Electrical equipment (1.0%)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. (Japan)	586,000	3,687,008

		3,687,008
Electronics (4.6%)
Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. (South Korea) †	61,310	653,287

LG Display Co., Ltd. (South Korea)	98,410	2,455,442

LG Electronics, Inc. (South Korea)	41,002	3,746,411

Rohm Co., Ltd. (Japan)	27,000	1,961,001

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (South Korea)	8,287	3,838,352

United Microelectronics Corp. ADR (Taiwan) ^S	556,900	1,470,216

Venture Corp., Ltd. (Singapore)	441,000	2,116,940

		16,241,649
Energy (oil field) (0.2%)
Weatherford International, Ltd. †	33,700	659,172

		659,172
Financial (2.5%)
Deutsche Bank AG (Germany)	55,792	3,397,889

Deutsche Boerse AG (Germany)	16,999	1,322,310

Irish Life & Permanent PLC (Ireland)	386,524	1,968,182

ORIX Corp. (Japan)	35,670	2,103,552

		8,791,933
Food (4.2%)
Kerry Group PLC Class A (Ireland)	48,876	1,116,763

Metro, Inc. (Canada)	47,205	1,545,053

Nestle SA (Switzerland)	232,872	8,798,981

Toyo Suisan Kaisha, Ltd. (Japan)	159,000	3,281,417

		14,742,214
Insurance (6.7%)
ACE, Ltd.	100,186	4,431,227

Allianz SE (Germany)	28,558	2,642,973

AXA SA (France)	305,675	5,783,627

Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft
AG (Germany)	18,893	2,557,273

RSA Insurance Group PLC (United Kingdom)	1,281,659	2,544,574

Zurich Financial Services AG (Switzerland)	32,052	5,680,053

		23,639,727
Investment banking/Brokerage (0.7%)
Credit Suisse Group (Switzerland)	56,015	2,560,011

		2,560,011
Media (1.0%)
WPP PLC (United Kingdom)	502,396	3,343,311

		3,343,311


COMMON STOCKS (98.0%)* cont.	Shares	Value

Metals (4.4%)
ArcelorMittal (Luxembourg)	91,969	$3,022,894

BHP Billiton, Ltd. (Australia)	105,272	2,890,247

BlueScope Steel, Ltd. (Australia)	1,037,717	2,102,610

Korea Zinc Co., Ltd. (South Korea)	4,668	504,555

POSCO (South Korea)	6,609	2,189,044

Vallourec SA (France) † ^S	23,500	2,859,379

Xstrata PLC (United Kingdom)	183,228	2,021,915

		15,590,644
Natural gas utilities (0.9%)
Centrica PLC (United Kingdom)	335,454	1,233,369

Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. (Japan)	541,000	1,933,992

		3,167,361
Office equipment and supplies (0.8%)
Canon, Inc. (Japan)	87,900	2,860,730

		2,860,730
Oil and gas (10.6%)
BG Group PLC (United Kingdom)	206,367	3,469,264

BP PLC (United Kingdom)	1,708,284	13,525,316

Husky Energy, Inc. (Canada)	23,000	644,103

Nexen, Inc. (Canada)	149,142	3,244,506

Nippon Mining Holdings, Inc. (Japan)	345,500	1,783,061

Petroleo Brasileiro SA ADR (Brazil)	57,137	2,341,474

Repsol YPF SA (Spain)	80,057	1,796,723

Royal Dutch Shell PLC Class B
(United Kingdom)	89,423	2,258,841

StatoilHydro ASA (Norway)	76,682	1,515,701

Total SA (France) ^S	121,211	6,570,434

		37,149,423
Pharmaceuticals (4.7%)
Astellas Pharma, Inc. (Japan)	127,900	4,517,710

Novartis AG (Switzerland)	67,811	2,758,230

Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan)	53,600	2,371,277

Roche Holding AG (Switzerland)	51,680	7,039,098

		16,686,315
Real estate (1.5%)
Japan Retail Fund Investment Corp. (Japan) ^R	29	133,778

Leopalace21 Corp. (Japan)	214,600	1,906,461

Wharf (Holdings), Ltd. (Hong Kong)	736,000	3,111,572

		5,151,811
Retail (3.0%)
FamilyMart Co., Ltd. (Japan)	60,300	1,889,843

Koninklijke Ahold NV (Netherlands)	292,093	3,359,183

Lawson, Inc. (Japan)	79,900	3,511,012

Next PLC (United Kingdom)	69,626	1,688,219

		10,448,257
Shipping (0.9%)
D/S Norden (Denmark)	73,193	2,519,105

D/S Norden 144A (Denmark)	21,262	731,780

		3,250,885
Software (0.7%)
UBISOFT Entertainment (France) †	104,272	2,551,168

		2,551,168
Technology services (0.4%)
Perfect World Co., Ltd. ADR (China) † ^S	46,500	1,329,900

		1,329,900
Telecommunications (4.3%)
America Movil SAB de CV ADR Ser. L (Mexico)	53,531	2,072,720

BCE, Inc. (Canada)	64,900	1,340,909

France Telecom SA (France)	119,924	2,726,934

KDDI Corp. (Japan)	557	2,952,927

Vodafone Group PLC (United Kingdom)	3,043,263	5,885,765

		14,979,255


COMMON STOCKS (98.0%)* cont.	Shares	Value

Telephone (1.8%)
Hellenic Telecommunication Organization
(OTE) SA (Greece)	89,084	$1,360,849

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone (NTT)
Corp. (Japan)	121,200	4,931,120

		6,291,969
Toys (0.3%)
Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (Japan)	29,700	1,023,759

		1,023,759
Transportation (0.3%)
DP World, Ltd. (United Arab Emirates)	2,750,597	992,966

		992,966
Transportation services (2.0%)
ComfortDelgro Corp., Ltd. (Singapore)	3,174,000	2,802,918

Deutsche Post AG (Germany)	210,071	2,747,935

Macquarie Infrastructure Group (Australia)	1,462,853	1,682,967

		7,233,820

Total common stocks (cost $347,850,698)		$344,434,998


U.S. TREASURY	Principal
OBLIGATIONS (0.1%)*	amount	Value

U.S. Treasury Notes 2 1/8s January 31, 2010 ⁱ	$334,000	$340,733

Total U.S. treasury obligations (cost $340,733)		$340,733


PURCHASED OPTIONS	Expiration date/	Contract
OUTSTANDING (—%)*	strike price	amount	Value

Porsche Automobil Holding
SE (Preference) (Call)	Aug-09/EUR 49.28	25,483	$120,801


Total purchased options outstanding (cost $134,232)			$120,801


SHORT-TERM	Principal amount/
INVESTMENTS (8.5%)*	shares	Value

Short-term investments held as
collateral for loaned securities
with yields ranging from 0.01%
to 0.89% and due dates ranging
from July 1, 2009 to August 7, 2009 ^d	$19,572,313	$19,572,214

Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund ^e	8,363,690	8,363,690

SSgA Prime Money Market Fund ⁱ	150,000	150,000

U.S. Treasury Cash Management
Bills with effective yields ranging from
0.37% to 0.42%, April 1, 2010 ## #	922,000	918,706

U.S. Treasury Bills for an effective
yield of 0.62%, maturity date
December 17, 2009 ## #	508,000	506,338

U.S. Treasury Bills with effective
yields ranging from 0.58% to 0.61%,
maturity date November 19, 2009 #	350,000	349,143


Total short-term investments (cost $29,860,858)		$29,860,091



TOTAL INVESTMENTS

Total investments (cost $378,186,521)		$374,756,623

Key to holding’s currency abbreviations

EUR Euro

* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $351,408,862

† Non-income-producing security.

# These securities, in part or in entirety, were pledged and segregated with the broker to cover margin requirements for futures contracts at June 30, 2009.

## These securities, in part or in entirety, were pledged and segregated with the custodian for collateral on certain derivative contracts at June 30, 2009.

^dSee Note 1 to the financial statements.

^eSee Note 6 to the financial statements regarding investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund.

ⁱSecurities purchased with cash or received, that were pledged to the fund for collateral on certain derivative contracts (Note 1).

^RReal Estate Investment Trust.

^SSecurities on loan, in part or in entirety, at June 30, 2009.

At June 30, 2009, liquid assets totaling $929,945 have been designated as collateral for open forward contracts and options contracts.

144A after the name of an issuer represents securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.

ADR after the name of a foreign holding stands for American Depository Receipts representing ownership of foreign securities on deposit with a custodian bank.

DIVERSIFICATION BY COUNTRY

Distribution of investments by country of risk at June 30, 2009 (as a percentage of Portfolio Value):


Japan	19.7%	Singapore	3.2%	Luxembourg	0.9%

United Kingdom	16.4	Australia	3.1	Italy	0.8

France	9.1	China	2.9	Brazil	0.8

Switzerland	8.7	Greece	1.3	Czech Republic	0.7

Canada	6.4	Norway	1.0	Mexico	0.6

Germany	5.7	Netherlands	0.9	Belgium	0.5

Spain	5.0	Denmark	0.9	Other	0.7

South Korea	4.6	Hong Kong	0.9	Total	100.0%

United States	4.3	Ireland	0.9

FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS TO BUY at 6/30/09 (aggregate face value $112,613,647)


				Unrealized
		Aggregate	Delivery	appreciation/
	Value	face value	date	(depreciation)

Australian Dollar	$19,753,202	$19,796,591	7/15/09	$(43,389)

British Pound	10,896,872	10,894,044	7/15/09	2,828

Canadian Dollar	9,769,676	10,498,998	7/15/09	(729,322)

Euro	23,649,465	23,900,357	7/15/09	(250,892)

Japanese Yen	29,533,846	29,590,110	7/15/09	(56,264)

Norwegian Krone	5,920,695	6,159,793	7/15/09	(239,098)

Swedish Krona	11,470,592	11,773,754	7/15/09	(303,162)

Total				$(1,619,299)

FORWARD CURRENCY CONTRACTS TO SELL at 6/30/09 (aggregate face value $83,684,788)


				Unrealized
		Aggregate	Delivery	appreciation/
	Value	face value	date	(depreciation)

Australian Dollar	$7,022,271	$7,038,831	7/15/09	$16,560

British Pound	7,167,353	7,173,307	7/15/09	5,954

Danish Krone	584,568	588,164	7/15/09	3,596

Euro	19,130,537	19,200,689	7/15/09	70,152

Hong Kong Dollar	1,931,610	1,931,322	7/15/09	(288)

Japanese Yen	22,185,478	22,268,226	7/15/09	82,748

Norwegian Krone	6,821,266	7,092,754	7/15/09	271,488

Singapore Dollar	5,779,830	5,800,240	7/15/09	20,410

Swedish Krona	3,649,630	3,742,060	7/15/09	92,430

Swiss Franc	8,706,972	8,849,195	7/15/09	142,223

Total				$705,273

FUTURES CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 6/30/09


	Number of		Expiration	Unrealized
	contracts	Value	date	appreciation

SPI 200 Index (Long)	3	$236,167	Sep-09	$365

Topix (Long)	10	959,622	Sep-09	4,520

Total				$4,885

WRITTEN OPTIONS OUTSTANDING at 6/30/09 (premiums received $248,064)


	Contract	Expiration date/
	amount	strike price	Value

Porsche Automobil Holding SE (Preference) (Put)	$27,814	Aug-09/EUR 40.32	$83,706

Wienerberger AG (Put)	188,798	Jul-09/$8.50	53,014

Total			$136,720

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. While the adoption of SFAS 157 does not have a material effect on the fund’s net asset value, it does require additional disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of the fund’s investments. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the fund’s net assets as of June 30, 2009:


		Valuation inputs

Investments in securities:	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3

Common stocks:

Basic materials	$—	$20,521,627	$—

Capital goods	—	9,856,034	—

Communication services	3,413,629	17,857,595	—

Conglomerates	—	7,720,505	—

Consumer cyclicals	1,356,664	36,618,517	—

Consumer staples	1,545,053	26,626,031	—

Energy	6,889,255	30,919,340	—

Financial	20,250,467	89,685,258	—

Health care	—	16,686,315	—

Technology	4,006,012	22,727,078	—

Transportation	992,966	17,083,125	—

Utilities and power	—	9,679,527	—

Total common stocks	38,454,046	305,980,952	—

Purchased options outstanding	—	120,801	—

U.S. Treasury Obligations	—	340,733	—

Short-term investments	8,513,690	21,346,401	—

Totals by level	$46,967,736	$327,788,887	$—

	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3

Other financial instruments:	$4,885	$(1,050,746)	$—

Other financial instruments include futures, written options, TBA sale commitments, swaps and forward contracts.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Statement of assets and liabilities 6/30/09


ASSETS

Investment in securities, at value, including $17,967,183
of securities on loan (Note 1):
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $369,822,831)	$366,392,933
Affiliated issuers (identified cost $8,363,690) (Note 6)	8,363,690

Dividends, interest and other receivables	1,463,686

Foreign Tax reclaim	657,042

Receivable for shares of the fund sold	125,641

Receivable for investments sold	18,174,065

Receivable for receivable purchase agreement (Note 2)	444,634

Unrealized appreciation on forward currency contracts
(Note 1)	833,103

Total assets	396,454,794

LIABILITIES

Payable to custodian (Note 2)	1,457,885

Payable for variation margin (Note 1)	23,964

Payable for investments purchased	18,555,795

Payable for shares of the fund repurchased	2,057,262

Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2)	436,908

Payable for custodian fees (Note 2)	40,084

Payable for investor servicing fees (Note 2)	71,755

Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)	122,861

Payable for administrative services (Note 2)	1,731

Payable for distribution fees (Note 2)	205,749

Unrealized depreciation on forward currency contracts
(Note 1)	1,747,129

Written options outstanding, at value (premiums
received $248,064) (Notes 1 and 3)	136,720

Collateral on securities loaned, at value (Note 1)	19,572,214

Collateral on certain derivative contracts, at value (Note 1)	490,733

Other accrued expenses	125,142

Total liabilities	45,045,932

Net assets	$351,408,862


REPRESENTED BY

Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized)
(Notes 1 and 4)	$719,841,114

Undistributed net investment income (Note 1)	925,231

Accumulated net realized loss on investments
and foreign currency transactions (Note 1)	(365,578,166)

Net unrealized depreciation of investments
and assets and liabilities in foreign currencies	(3,779,317)

Total — Representing net assets applicable to
capital shares outstanding	$351,408,862

COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE

Net asset value and redemption price per class A share
($271,778,035 divided by 35,423,373 shares)	$7.67

Offering price per class A share (100/94.25 of $7.67)*	$8.14

Net asset value and offering price per class B share
($27,911,753 divided by 3,676,225 shares)**	$7.59

Net asset value and offering price per class C share
($13,115,571 divided by 1,719,736 shares)**	$7.63

Net asset value and redemption price per class M share
($5,525,188 divided by 719,584 shares)	$7.68

Offering price per class M share (100/96.50 of $7.68)*	$7.96

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price
per class R share ($2,056,982 divided by 271,460 shares)	$7.58

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price
per class Y share ($31,021,333 divided by 4,032,920 shares)	$7.69

* On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.

** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Statement of operations Year ended 6/30/09


INVESTMENT INCOME

Dividends (net of foreign tax of $1,459,409)	$16,708,107

Interest (including interest income of $17,244
from investments in affiliated issuers) (Note 6)	43,849

Securities lending	158,669

Total investment income	16,910,625

EXPENSES

Compensation of Manager (Note 2)	3,856,116

Investor servicing fees (Note 2)	1,878,630

Custodian fees (Note 2)	66,697

Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)	43,149

Administrative services (Note 2)	28,143

Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2)	976,143

Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2)	449,474

Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2)	185,235

Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2)	60,691

Distribution fees — Class R (Note 2)	9,832

Other	369,634

Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Notes 2 and 6)	(846,944)

Total expenses	7,076,800

Expense reduction (Note 2)	(189,635)

Net expenses	6,887,165

Net investment income	10,023,460

Net realized loss on investments (Notes 1 and 3)	(333,903,226)

Net realized loss on futures contracts (Note 1)	(421,701)

Net realized loss on foreign currency transactions (Note 1)	(15,728,130)

Net realized gain on written options (Notes 1 and 3)	95,864

Net unrealized depreciation of assets and liabilities in
foreign currencies during the year	(3,776,387)

Net unrealized depreciation of investments, futures
contracts and written options during the year	(3,290,749)

Net loss on investments	(357,024,329)

Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations	$(347,000,869)

Statement of changes in net assets


DECREASE IN NET ASSETS
	Year ended	Year ended
	6/30/09	6/30/08

Operations:

Net investment income	$10,023,460	$17,598,972

Net realized loss on investments and
foreign currency transactions	(349,957,193)	(6,823,908)

Net unrealized depreciation of
investments and assets and liabilities
in foreign currencies	(7,067,136)	(186,222,693)

Net decrease in net assets resulting
from operations	(347,000,869)	(175,447,629)

Distributions to shareholders (Note 1):

From ordinary income

Net investment income

Class A	(5,593,426)	(19,193,757)

Class B	—	(1,782,791)

Class C	(39,636)	(609,144)

Class M	(37,100)	(321,834)

Class R	(26,979)	(49,981)

Class Y	(643,390)	(1,189,300)

Net realized short-term gain on investments

Class A	—	(53,602,033)

Class B	—	(8,823,562)

Class C	—	(2,685,749)

Class M	—	(1,214,025)

Class R	—	(146,778)

Class Y	—	(2,977,604)

From net realized long-term gain on investments

Class A	—	(69,537,205)

Class B	—	(11,446,691)

Class C	—	(3,484,186)

Class M	—	(1,574,939)

Class R	—	(190,412)

Class Y	—	(3,862,806)

From return of capital

Class A	(74,434)	—

Class B	—	—

Class C	(527)	—

Class M	(494)	—

Class R	(359)	—

Class Y	(8,562)	—

Increase in capital from settlement payments	1,174,272	—

Redemption fees (Note 1)	24,346	63,619

Increase (decrease) from capital share
transactions (Note 4)	(238,603,345)	116,830,209

Total decrease in net assets	(590,830,503)	(241,246,598)


NET ASSETS

Beginning of year	942,239,365	1,183,485,963

End of year (including undistributed net
investment income of $925,231 and
$3,402,726, respectively)	$351,408,862	$942,239,365

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)


INVESTMENT OPERATIONS:					LESS DISTRIBUTIONS:								RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

												Total		Ratio	Ratio of net
			Net realized and	Total from	From net	From net					Net asset	return	Net assets,	of expenses	investment income
	Net asset value,	Net investment	unrealized gain (loss)	investment	investment	realized gain on	From return	Total	Redemption	Non-recurring	value, end of	at net asset	end of period	to average	(loss) to average	Portfolio
Period ended	beginning of period	income (loss) a,b	on investments	operations	income	investments	of capital	distributions	fees c	reimbursements	period	value (%) d	(in thousands)	net assets (%) b,e	net assets (%) b	turnover (%)

Class A
June 30, 2009	$12.54	.18	(4.96)	(4.78)	(.12)	—	— c	(.12)	—	.03h,i	$7.67	(37.76)	$271,778	1.34	2.11	91.69
June 30, 2008	17.36	.26	(2.51)	(2.25)	(.35)	(2.22)	—	(2.57)	—	—	12.54	(14.26)	751,388	1.30	1.72	64.84
June 30, 2007	14.80	.22	3.90	4.12	(.43)	(1.13)	—	(1.56)	—	—	17.36	29.14	914,680	1.34	1.37	105.32
June 30, 2006	11.68	.24 f	3.04	3.28	(.16)	—	—	(.16)	—	—	14.80	28.23	623,921	1.39 f	1.76 f	94.24
June 30, 2005	10.39	.16 g	1.22	1.38	(.09)	—	—	(.09)	—	—	11.68	13.27	416,868	1.38	1.46 g	62.40

Class B
June 30, 2009	$12.29	.11	(4.84)	(4.73)	—	—	—	—	—	.03h,i	$7.59	(38.24)	$27,912	2.09	1.30	91.69
June 30, 2008	17.03	.11	(2.43)	(2.32)	(.20)	(2.22)	—	(2.42)	—	—	12.29	(14.93)	94,624	2.05	.77	64.84
June 30, 2007	14.53	.08	3.85	3.93	(.30)	(1.13)	—	(1.43)	—	—	17.03	28.19	177,599	2.09	.51	105.32
June 30, 2006	11.45	.10 f	3.02	3.12	(.04)	—	—	(.04)	—	—	14.53	27.31	178,818	2.14 f	.75 f	94.24
June 30, 2005	10.21	.06 g	1.20	1.26	(.02)	—	—	(.02)	—	—	11.45	12.38	216,063	2.13	.54 g	62.40

Class C
June 30, 2009	$12.37	.11	(4.86)	(4.75)	(.02)	—	— c	(.02)	—	.03h,i	$7.63	(38.16)	$13,116	2.09	1.37	91.69
June 30, 2008	17.15	.13	(2.47)	(2.34)	(.22)	(2.22)	—	(2.44)	—	—	12.37	(14.93)	34,789	2.05	.90	64.84
June 30, 2007	14.65	.09	3.87	3.96	(.33)	(1.13)	—	(1.46)	—	—	17.15	28.17	48,366	2.09	.60	105.32
June 30, 2006	11.57	.13 f	3.02	3.15	(.07)	—	—	(.07)	—	—	14.65	27.29	34,943	2.14 f	.96 f	94.24
June 30, 2005	10.32	.08 g	1.20	1.28	(.03)	—	—	(.03)	—	—	11.57	12.39	26,519	2.13	.67 g	62.40

Class M
June 30, 2009	$12.47	.13	(4.91)	(4.78)	(.04)	—	— c	(.04)	—	.03h,i	$7.68	(38.06)	$5,525	1.84	1.59	91.69
June 30, 2008	17.25	.17	(2.47)	(2.30)	(.26)	(2.22)	—	(2.48)	—	—	12.47	(14.62)	16,115	1.80	1.17	64.84
June 30, 2007	14.72	.13	3.88	4.01	(.35)	(1.13)	—	(1.48)	—	—	17.25	28.47	22,173	1.84	.83	105.32
June 30, 2006	11.61	.16 f	3.04	3.20	(.09)	—	—	(.09)	—	—	14.72	27.67	17,889	1.89 f	1.15 f	94.24
June 30, 2005	10.35	.09 g	1.22	1.31	(.05)	—	—	(.05)	—	—	11.61	12.62	15,053	1.88	.85 g	62.40

Class R
June 30, 2009	$12.40	.17	(4.91)	(4.74)	(.11)	—	— c	(.11)	—	.03h,i	$7.58	(37.90)	$2,057	1.59	2.14	91.69
June 30, 2008	17.21	.26	(2.52)	(2.26)	(.33)	(2.22)	—	(2.55)	—	—	12.40	(14.43)	2,835	1.55	1.81	64.84
June 30, 2007	14.72	.23	3.82	4.05	(.43)	(1.13)	—	(1.56)	—	—	17.21	28.78	1,440	1.59	1.46	105.32
June 30, 2006	11.63	.26 f	2.98	3.24	(.15)	—	—	(.15)	—	—	14.72	28.03	433	1.64 f	1.89 f	94.24
June 30, 2005	10.39	.27 g	1.06	1.33	(.09)	—	—	(.09)	—	—	11.63	12.83	129	1.63	2.34 g	62.40

Class Y
June 30, 2009	$12.61	.22	(5.01)	(4.79)	(.16)	—	— c	(.16)	—	.03h,i	$7.69	(37.62)	$31,021	1.09	2.70	91.69
June 30, 2008	17.44	.31	(2.53)	(2.22)	(.39)	(2.22)	—	(2.61)	—	—	12.61	(14.02)	42,488	1.05	2.11	64.84
June 30, 2007	14.86	.23	3.95	4.18	(.47)	(1.13)	—	(1.60)	—	—	17.44	29.44	19,229	1.09	1.46	105.32
June 30, 2006	11.71	.25 f	3.09	3.34	(.19)	—	—	(.19)	—	—	14.86	28.69	19,638	1.14 f	1.86 f	94.24
June 30, 2005	10.42	.20 g	1.20	1.40	(.11)	—	—	(.11)	—	—	11.71	13.42	21,292	1.13	1.79 g	62.40

a Per share net investment income (loss) has been determined on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.

b Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation and/or waivers of certain fund expenses in connection with investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation and/or waivers, the expenses of each class reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Notes 2 and 6):


	Percentage of average net assets
June 30, 2009	0.17%

June 30, 2008	<0.01

June 30, 2007	0.01

June 30, 2006	0.04

June 30, 2005	0.05

c Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.

d Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.

e Includes amounts paid through expense offset and brokerage service arrangements (Note 2).

f Reflects a non-recurring reimbursement from Putnam Investments relating to the calculation of certain amounts paid by the fund to Putnam in previous years for transfer agent services, which amounted to less than $0.01 per share and 0.01% of average net assets for the period ended June 30, 2006.

g Reflects a non-recurring accrual related to Putnam Management’s settlement with the SEC regarding brokerage allocation practices, which amounted to less than $0.01 per share and 0.01% of average net assets.

h Reflects non-recurring reimbursement pursuant to a settlement between the SEC and Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. and Bear Stearns Securities Corp., which amounted to $0.01 per share outstanding as of May 21, 2009.

i Reflects non-recurring reimbursement pursuant to a settlement between the SEC and Millenium Partners, L.P., Millenium Management, L.L.C and Millenium International Management, LLC, which amounted to $0.02 per share outstanding as of June 23, 2009.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


28	29

Notes to financial statements 6/30/09

Note 1: Significant accounting policies

Putnam International Growth and Income Fund (the “fund”), a Massachusetts business trust, is a series of Putnam Funds Trust (the “trust”) which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund invests primarily in common stocks of mid- and large-cap foreign companies that Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”), the fund’s manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC believes to be undervalued.

The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M, class R and class Y shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 5.75% and 3.50%, respectively, and generally do not pay a contingent deferred sales charge. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately eight years, do not pay a front-end sales charge and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. Class R shares, which are offered to qualified employee-benefit plans, are sold at net asset value. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2. Class Y shares, which are sold at net asset value, are generally subject to the same expenses as class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, but do not bear a distribution fee. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.

A 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 90 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital.

Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. If the fund were liquidated, shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.

In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund’s management team expects the risk of material loss to be remote.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements were issued, August 12, 2009, have been evaluated in the preparation of the financial statements.

A) Security valuation Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last reported sales price on their principal exchange, or official closing price for certain markets. If no sales are reported — as in the case of some securities traded over-the-counter — a security is valued at its last reported bid price. Market quotations are not considered to be readily available for certain debt obligations; such investments are valued on the basis of valuations furnished by an independent pricing service approved by the Trustees or dealers selected by Putnam Management. Such services or dealers determine valuations for normal institutional-size trading units of such securities using methods based on market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships, generally recognized by institutional traders, between securities (which considers such factors as security prices, yields, maturities and ratings). Many securities markets and exchanges outside the U.S. close prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange and therefore the closing prices for securities in such markets or on such exchanges may not fully reflect events that occur after such close but before the close of the New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, on certain days, the fund will fair value foreign equity securities taking into account multiple factors, including movements in the U.S. securities markets. The number of days on which fair value prices will be used will depend on market activity and it is possible that fair value prices will be used by the fund to a significant extent. At June 30, 2009, fair value pricing was used for certain foreign securities in this portfolio. Securities quoted in foreign currencies, if any, are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. To the extent a pricing service or dealer is unable to value a security or provides a valuation which Putnam Management does not believe accurately reflects the security’s fair value, the security will be valued at fair value by Putnam Management. Certain securities may be valued by a price provided by a single source. Certain investments, including certain restricted and illiquid securities and derivatives, are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security in a current sale and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.

B) Joint trading account Pursuant to an exemptive order from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the fund may transfer uninvested cash balances, including cash collateral received under security lending arrangements, into a joint trading account along with the cash of other registered investment companies and certain other accounts managed by Putnam Management. These balances may be invested in issues of short-term investments having maturities of up to 397 days for collateral received under security lending arrangements and up to 90 days for other cash investments.

C) Repurchase agreements The fund, or any joint trading account, through its custodian, receives delivery of the underlying securities, the market value of which at the time of purchase is required to be in an amount at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the fund and the counterparty. Putnam Management is responsible for determining that the value of these underlying securities is at all times at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest.

D) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income, net of applicable withholding taxes, is recognized on the ex-dividend date except that certain dividends from foreign securities, if any, are recognized as soon as the fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividends, if any, are recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Dividends representing a return of capital or capital gains, if any, are reflected as a reduction of cost and/or as a realized gain. All premiums/discounts are amortized/accreted on a yield-to-maturity basis.

of the fund after translation to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rates on that day. The cost of each security is determined using historical exchange rates. Income and withholding taxes are translated at prevailing exchange rates when earned or incurred. The fund does not isolate that portion of realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in the foreign exchange rate on investments from fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of the securities. Such gains and losses are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net realized exchange gains or losses on closed forward currency contracts, disposition of foreign currencies, currency gains and losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and the difference between the amount of investment income and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies arise from changes in the value of open forward currency contracts and assets and liabilities other than investments at the period end, resulting from changes in the exchange rate. Investments in foreign securities involve certain risks, including those related to economic instability, unfavorable political developments, and currency fluctuations, not present with domestic investments.

F) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns, owned or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.

The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, interest or exchange rates moving unexpectedly or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. With futures, there is minimal counterparty credit risk to the fund since futures are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures against default. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a written put option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as a reduction to the cost of investments.

Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio. Outstanding contracts at period-end are indicative of the volume of activity during the period.

G) Forward currency contracts The fund may buy and sell forward currency contracts, which are agreements between two parties to buy and sell currencies at a set price on a future date. These contracts are used to protect against a decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar of the currencies in which its portfolio securities are denominated or quoted (or an increase in the value of a currency in which securities a fund intends to buy are denominated, when a fund holds cash reserves and short term investments), or for other investment purposes. The U.S. dollar value of forward currency contracts is determined using current forward currency exchange rates supplied by a quotation service. The market value of the contract will fluctuate with changes in currency exchange rates. The contract is marked to market daily and the change in market value is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. The fund could be exposed to risk if the value of the currency changes unfavorably, if the counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the fund is unable to enter into a closing position. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. Forward currency contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio. Outstanding contracts at period-end are indicative of the volume of activity during the period.

H) Master agreements The fund is a party to ISDA (International Swap and Derivatives Association, Inc.) Master Agreements (“Master Agreements”) with certain counterparties that govern over the counter derivative and foreign exchange contracts entered into from time to time. The Master Agreements may contain provisions regarding, among other things, the parties’ general obligations, representations, agreements, collateral requirements, events of default and early termination. With respect to certain counterparties, in accordance with the terms of the Master Agreements, collateral posted to the fund is held in a segregated account by the fund’s custodian and with respect to those amounts which can be sold or repledged, are presented in the fund’s portfolio; collateral pledged by the fund is segregated by the fund’s custodian and identified in the fund’s portfolio. Collateral can be in the form of cash or debt securities issued by the U.S. Government or related agencies or other securities as agreed to by the fund and the applicable counterparty. Collateral requirements are determined based on the fund’s net position with each counterparty. Termination events applicable to the fund may occur upon a decline in the fund’s net assets below a specified threshold over a certain period of time. Termination events applicable to counterparties may occur upon a decline in the counterparty’s long-term and short-term credit ratings below a specified level. In each case, upon occurrence, the other party may elect to terminate early and cause settlement of all derivative and foreign exchange contracts outstanding, including the payment of any losses and costs resulting from such early termination, as reasonably determined by the terminating party. Any decision by one or more of the fund’s counterparties to elect early termination could impact the fund’s future derivative activity.

As of June 30, 2009, due to a decrease in the fund’s net asset value during the year, such counterparties were entitled to elect, but had not yet elected, to terminate early, and cause settlement of all outstanding derivative and foreign exchange contracts outstanding under the applicable Master Agreements, including the payment by the fund of any losses and costs resulting from such early termination, as reasonably determined by such counterparty. At June 30, 2009, the fund had net unrealized gains of $278,208 and net unrealized losses of $1,094,319 on derivative contracts subject to the Master Agreements. Collateral posted by the fund for contracts in a net unrealized loss position totaled $610,816. The fund intends to seek a waiver of or other relief from this provision, from the counterparties.

I) Securities lending The fund may lend securities, through its agents, to qualified borrowers in order to earn additional income. The loans are collateralized by cash and/or securities in an amount at least equal to the market value of the securities loaned. The market value of securities loaned is determined daily and any additional required collateral is allocated to the fund on the next business day. The risk of borrower default will be borne by the fund’s agents; the fund will bear the risk of loss with respect to the investment of the cash collateral. Income from securities lending is included in investment income on the Statement of operations. At June 30, 2009, the value of securities loaned amounted to $17,967,183. The fund received cash collateral of $19,572,214 which is pooled with collateral of other Putnam funds into 24 issues of short-term investments.

J) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its taxable income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code. The fund is subject to the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 sets forth a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The fund did not have any unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial statements. No provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains. Each of the fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.

At June 30, 2009, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $154,357,123 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. This capital loss carryover will expire on June 30, 2017.

Pursuant to federal income tax regulations applicable to regulated investment companies, the fund has elected to defer to its fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 $196,756,956 of losses recognized during the period November 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009.

K) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. These differences include temporary and/or permanent differences of losses on wash sale transactions, foreign currency gains and losses, post-October loss deferrals, unrealized gains and losses on passive foreign investment companies, net operating loss, tax dividend adjustment, restitution payment, and receivable purchase agreement gain. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the fund reclassified $6,160,424 to decrease undistributed net investment income and $11,558,595 to decrease paid-in-capital, with a decrease to accumulated net realized losses of $17,719,019.

The tax basis components of distributable earnings and the federal tax cost as of June 30, 2009 were as follows:


Unrealized appreciation	$23,840,368
Unrealized depreciation	(41,734,353)

Net unrealized depreciation	(17,893,985)
Capital loss carryforward	154,357,123
Post-October loss	196,756,956

Cost for federal income tax purposes	$392,650,608

L) Expenses of the trust Expenses directly charged or attributable to any fund will be paid from the assets of that fund. Generally, expenses of the trust will be allocated among and charged to the assets of each fund on a basis that the Trustees deem fair and equitable, which may be based on the relative assets of each fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each fund.

Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and
other transactions

Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through July 31, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. For the year ended June 30, 2009, Putnam Management waived $846,253 of its management fee from the fund.

Putnam Management has contractually agreed, from August 1, 2009 through July 31, 2010, to limit the management fee for the fund to 0.712% based on the fund’s average net assets.

Putnam Management has also contractually agreed from August 1, 2009 through July 31, 2010, to limit each fund’s expenses (not including brokerage, interest, taxes, investment-related expenses, extraordinary expenses and payments under each fund’s investor servicing contract, investment management contract and distribution plan) to an annual rate of 0.20% of each fund’s average net assets.

Putnam Investments Limited (“PIL”), an affiliate of Putnam Management, is authorized by the Trustees to manage a separate portion of the assets of the fund as determined by Putnam Management from time to time. Putnam Management pays a quarterly sub-management fee to PIL for its services at an annual rate of 0.35% of the average net assets of the portion of the fund managed by PIL.

The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC (“PAC”), an affiliate of Putnam Management, is authorized by the Trustees to manage a separate portion of the assets of the fund, as designated from time to time by Putnam Management or PIL. Putnam Management or PIL, as applicable, pays a quarterly sub-advisory fee to PAC for its services at the annual rate of 0.35% of the average net assets of the portion of the fund’s assets for which PAC is engaged as sub-adviser.

On September 15, 2008, the fund terminated its outstanding derivatives contracts with Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“LBSF”) in connection with the bankruptcy filing of LBSF’s parent company, Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. On September 26, 2008, the fund entered into an Agreement with another registered investment company (the “Purchaser”) managed by Putnam Management. Under the Agreement, the fund sold to the Purchaser the fund’s right to receive, in the aggregate, $1,725,299 in net payments from LBSF in connection with certain terminated derivatives transactions (the “Receivable”), in exchange for an initial payment plus (or minus) additional amounts based on the applicable Purchaser’s ultimate realized gain (or loss) on the Receivable. The Receivable will be offset against the funds net receivable from LBSF which is included in the Statement of assets and liabilities in Receivable for investments sold. The Agreement, which is included in the Statement of assets and liabilities, is valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. All remaining payments under the Agreement will be recorded as realized gain or loss.

The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.

Custodial functions for the fund’s assets are provided by State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). Custody fees are based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings and transaction volumes.

Management. Putnam Investor Services, Inc. and Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing, subject to certain limitations, based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. The amounts incurred for investor servicing agent functions provided by affiliates of Putnam Management during the year ended June 30, 2009 are included in Investor servicing fees in the Statement of operations.

Under the custodian contract between the fund and State Street, the custodian bank has a lien on the securities of the fund to the extent permitted by the fund’s investment restrictions to cover any advances made by the custodian bank for the settlement of securities purchased by the fund. At June 30, 2009, the payable to the custodian bank represents the amount due for cash advanced for the settlement of securities purchased.

The fund has entered into expense offset arrangements with PFTC and State Street whereby PFTC’s and State Street’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. The fund also reduced expenses through brokerage/service arrangements. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $6,052 under the expense offset arrangements and by $183,583 under the brokerage/service arrangements.

Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $415, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings and industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees.

The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.

The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.

The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at an annual rate of 0.25%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 0.75% and 0.50% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively.

For the year ended June 30, 2009, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $43,364 and $375 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $49,686 and $1,825 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.

A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% and 0.65% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A and class M shares, respectively. For the year ended June 30, 2009, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received $143 and no monies on class A and class M redemptions, respectively.

Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities

During the year ended June 30, 2009, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $469,821,272 and $725,578,537, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.

Written option transactions during the year ended June 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:


	Contract	Premiums
	Amounts	Received

Written options outstanding
at beginning of year	—	$—

Options opened	247,213	343,929

Options exercised	—	—

Options expired	(30,601)	(95,865)

Options closed	—	—

Written options outstanding
at end of year	216,612	$248,064

Note 4: Capital shares

At June 30, 2009, there were an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:


	Year ended 06/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class A	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	4,928,118	$41,148,891	14,633,328	$221,628,565

Shares issued in	750,993	5,317,029	9,840,037	135,300,578
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	5,679,111	46,465,920	24,473,365	356,929,143

Shares	(30,161,732)	(242,432,350)	(17,268,717)	(243,164,712)
repurchased

Net increase	(24,482,621)	$(195,966,430)	7,204,648	$113,764,431
(decrease)


	Year ended 06/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class B	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	395,654	$3,101,088	1,392,511	$20,865,185

Shares issued in	—	—	1,494,709	20,223,416
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	395,654	3,101,088	2,887,220	41,088,601

Shares	(4,417,027)	(36,393,562)	(5,620,514)	(80,345,900)
repurchased

Net decrease	(4,021,373)	$(33,292,474)	(2,733,294)	$(39,257,299)


	Year ended 06/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class C	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	227,002	$1,866,790	447,792	$6,688,807

Shares issued in	4,486	31,714	397,415	5,412,793
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	231,488	1,898,504	845,207	12,101,600

Shares	(1,323,111)	(10,412,490)	(854,496)	(11,975,361)
repurchased

Net increase	(1,091,623)	$(8,513,986)	(9,289)	$126,239
(decrease)


	Year ended 06/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class M	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	79,448	$643,288	172,558	$2,599,623

Shares issued in	5,022	35,708	218,217	2,989,573
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	84,470	678,996	390,775	5,589,196

Shares	(657,540)	(5,315,854)	(383,455)	(5,430,432)
repurchased

Net increase	(573,070)	$(4,636,858)	7,320	$158,764
(decrease)


	Year ended 06/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class R	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	137,656	$1,062,424	170,876	$2,536,880

Shares issued in	3,273	22,940	23,493	319,739
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	140,929	1,085,364	194,369	2,856,619

Shares	(98,161)	(788,131)	(49,321)	(673,959)
repurchased

Net increase	42,768	$297,233	145,048	$2,182,660


	Year ended 06/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class Y	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	5,169,386	$36,515,258	3,473,603	$58,094,734

Shares issued in	91,954	651,952	581,860	8,029,710
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	5,261,340	37,167,210	4,055,463	66,124,444

Shares	(4,598,226)	(33,658,040)	(1,788,453)	(26,269,030)
repurchased

Net increase	663,114	$3,509,170	2,267,010	$39,855,414

Note 5: Summary of derivative activity

The following is a summary of the market values of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2009:


	Asset derivatives		Liability derivatives

Derivatives not
accounted for
as hedging	Balance		Balance
instruments under	sheet	Market	sheet	Market
Statement 133	location	value	location	value

Foreign exchange	Receivables	833,103	Payables	1,747,129
contracts

Equity contracts	Receivables	125,686*	Payables	136,720*


Total		$958,789		$1,883,849

* Includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation of futures contracts as reported in the fund’s portfolio. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of assets and liabilities.

The following is a summary of realized and unrealized gains or losses of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the period ended June 30, 2009 (see Note 1).

Amount of realized gain (loss) on derivatives recognized in income


Derivatives not
accounted for as
hedging			Forward
instruments under			currency
Statement 133	Options	Futures	contracts	Total

Foreign exchange	$—	$—	$(15,876,203)	$(15,876,203)
contracts

Equity contracts	(113,824)	(421,701)	—	(535,525)


Total	$ (113,824)	$ (421,701)	$(15,876,203)	$(16,411,728)

Change in unrealized appreciation or (depreciation) on derivatives recognized in income


Derivatives not
accounted for as
hedging			Forward
instruments under			currency
Statement 133	Options	Futures	contracts	Total

Foreign exchange	$—	$—	$(3,851,841)	$(3,851,841)
contracts

Equity contracts	97,913	4,885	—	102,798


Total	$97,913	$4,885	$(3,851,841)	$(3,749,043)

Note 6: Investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund and
Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund

The fund invested in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund were valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Management fees paid by the fund were reduced by an amount equal to the management fees paid by Putnam Prime Money Market Fund with respect to assets invested by the fund in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. For the year ended June 30, 2009, management fees paid were reduced by $691 relating to the fund’s investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. Income distributions earned by the fund were recorded as interest income in the Statement of operations and totaled $13,058 for the year ended June 30, 2009. During the year ended June 30, 2009, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund aggregated $33,323,876 and $39,661,606, respectively.

On September 17, 2008, the Trustees of the Putnam Prime Money Market Fund voted to close that fund effective September 17, 2008. On September 24, 2008, the fund received shares of Federated Prime Obligations Fund, an unaffiliated management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, in liquidation of its shares of Putnam Prime Money Market Fund.

In April 2009, the fund invested in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund are valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Income distributions earned by the fund are recorded as interest income in the Statement of operations and totaled $4,186 for the year ended June 30, 2009. During the year ended June 30, 2009, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund aggregated $46,516,856 and $38,153,166, respectively. Management fees charged to Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund have been waived by Putnam Management.

Note 7: Regulatory matters and litigation

In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division in connection with excessive short-term trading in Putnam funds. Distribution of payments from Putnam Management to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders is expected to be completed in the next several months. These allegations and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.

Note 8: Market and credit risk

In the normal course of business, the fund trades financial instruments and enters into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the contracting party to the transaction to perform (credit risk). The fund may be exposed to additional credit risk that an institution or other entity with which the fund has unsettled or open transactions will default.

Note 9: Other

At their July 2009 meeting, the Board of Trustees approved a new management contract for the fund, which will be submitted to shareholders for approval at a meeting expected to be held in the fourth quarter of 2009. Under the proposed management contract, management fee breakpoints would be determined by reference to the assets of all of the open-end Putnam Funds, rather than only the assets of the fund.

Federal tax information (unaudited)

For the year ended June 30, 2009, a portion of the fund’s distribution represents a return of capital and is therefore not taxable to shareholders.

For the period, interest and dividends from foreign countries were $17,983,908 or $0.39 per share (for all classes of shares), Taxes paid to foreign countries were $1,459,409 or $0.03 per share (for all classes of shares).

For the tax year ended June 30, 2009, pursuant to §871(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, the fund hereby designates $11,565 of distributions paid as qualifying to be taxed as interest-related dividends for nonresident alien shareholders.

The Form 1099 you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2009.

About the Trustees

Ravi Akhoury

Born 1947, Trustee since 2009

Mr. Akhoury serves as Advisor to New York Life Insurance Company, and previously was a Member of its Executive Management Committee. He is also a Director of Jacob Ballas Capital India (a non-banking finance company focused on private equity advisory services) and is a member of its Compensation Committee. In addition, he serves as a Trustee of American India Foundation and of the Rubin Museum, serving on its Investment Committee.

Previously, Mr. Akhoury was a Director and on the Compensation Committee of MaxIndia/New York Life Insurance Company in India. He was also Vice President and Investment Policy Committee Member of Fischer, Francis, Trees and Watts (a fixed-income portfolio management firm). He has also served on the Board of Bharti Telecom (an Indian telecommunications company), serving as a member of its Audit and Compensation committees, and as a member of the Audit Committee on the Board of Thompson Press (a publishing company). From 1992 to 2007, he was Chairman and CEO of MacKay Shields, a multi-product investment management firm with over $40 billion in assets under management.

Mr. Akhoury graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology and holds an M.S. from State University of New York at Stonybrook.

Jameson A. Baxter

Born 1943, Trustee since 1994,
Vice Chairman since 2005

Ms. Baxter is the President of Baxter Associates, Inc., a private investment firm. Ms. Baxter serves as a Director of ASHTA Chemicals, Inc., and the Mutual Fund Directors Forum. Until 2007, she was a Director of Banta Corporation (a printing and supply chain management company), Ryerson, Inc. (a metals service corporation), and Advocate Health Care. Until 2004, she was a Director of BoardSource (formerly the National Center for Nonprofit Boards); and until 2002, she was a Director of Intermatic Corporation (a manufacturer of energy control products). She is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees, Mount Holyoke College, having served as Chairman for five years.

Ms. Baxter has held various positions in investment banking and corporate finance, including Vice President of and Consultant to First Boston Corporation and Vice President and Principal of the Regency Group. She is a graduate of Mount Holyoke College.

Charles B. Curtis

Born 1940, Trustee since 2001

Mr. Curtis is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (a private foundation dealing with national security issues), and serves as Senior Advisor to the United Nations Foundation.

Mr. Curtis is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the National Petroleum Council. He also serves as Director of Edison International and Southern California Edison. Until 2006, Mr. Curtis served as a member of the Trustee Advisory Council of the Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University.

From August 1997 to December 1999, Mr. Curtis was a Partner at Hogan & Hartson LLP, an international law firm headquartered in Washington, D.C. Prior to May 1997, Mr. Curtis was Deputy Secretary of Energy and Under Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. In addition, he was a founding member of the law firm of Van Ness Feldman. Mr. Curtis served as Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 1977 to 1981 and has held positions on the staff of the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the SEC.

Robert J. Darretta

Born 1946, Trustee since 2007

Mr. Darretta serves as Director of United Health Group, a diversified health-care company.

Until April 2007, Mr. Darretta was Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Johnson & Johnson, one of the world’s largest and most broadly based health-care companies. Prior to 2007, he had responsibility for Johnson & Johnson’s finance, investor relations, information technology, and procurement function. He served as Johnson & Johnson Chief Financial Officer for a decade, prior to which he spent two years as Treasurer of the corporation and over ten years leading various Johnson & Johnson operating companies.

Mr. Darretta received a B.S. in Economics from Villanova University.

Myra R. Drucker

Born 1948, Trustee since 2004

Ms. Drucker is Chair of the Board of Trustees of Commonfund (a not-for-profit firm specializing in managing assets for educational endowments and foundations), Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Sarah Lawrence College, and a member of the Investment Committee of the Kresge Foundation (a charitable trust). She is also a Director of Interactive Data Corporation (a provider of financial market data and analytics to financial institutions and investors).

Ms. Drucker is an ex-officio member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Pension Managers Advisory Committee, having served as Chair for seven years. She serves as an advisor to RCM Capital Management (an investment management firm) and to the Employee Benefits Investment Committee of The Boeing Company (an aerospace firm).

From November 2001 until August 2004, Ms. Drucker was Managing Director and a member of the Board of Directors of General Motors Asset Management and Chief Investment Officer of General Motors Trust Bank. From December 1992 to November 2001, Ms. Drucker served as Chief Investment Officer of Xerox Corporation (a document company). Prior to December 1992, Ms. Drucker was Staff Vice President and Director of

Trust Investments for International Paper (a paper and packaging company).

Ms. Drucker received a B.A. in Literature and Psychology from Sarah Lawrence College and pursued graduate studies in economics, statistics, and portfolio theory at Temple University.

John A. Hill

Born 1942, Trustee since 1985 and
Chairman since 2000

Mr. Hill is founder and Vice-Chairman of First Reserve Corporation, the leading private equity buyout firm specializing in the worldwide energy industry, with offices in Greenwich, Connecticut; Houston, Texas; London, England; and Shanghai, China. The firm’s investments on behalf of some of the nation’s largest pension and endowment funds are currently concentrated in 31 companies with annual revenues in excess of $13 billion, which employ over 100,000 people in 23 countries.

Mr. Hill is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Putnam Mutual Funds, a Director of Devon Energy Corporation and various private companies owned by First Reserve, and serves as a Trustee of Sarah Lawrence College where he serves as Chairman and also chairs the Investment Committee. He is also a member of the Advisory Board of the Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance at the Yale School of Management.

Prior to forming First Reserve in 1983, Mr. Hill served as President of F. Eberstadt and Company, an investment banking and investment management firm. Between 1969 and 1976, Mr. Hill held various senior positions in Washington, D.C. with the federal government, including Deputy Associate Director of the Office of Management and Budget and Deputy Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration during the Ford Administration.

Born and raised in Midland, Texas, Mr. Hill received his B.A. in Economics from Southern Methodist University and pursued graduate studies as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow.

Paul L. Joskow

Born 1947, Trustee since 1997

Dr. Joskow is an economist and President of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (a philanthropic institution focused primarily on research and education on issues related to science, technology, and economic performance). He is on leave from his position as the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics and Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he has been on the faculty since 1972. Dr. Joskow was the Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research at MIT from 1999 through 2007.

Dr. Joskow serves as a Trustee of Yale University, as a Director of TransCanada Corporation (an energy company focused on natural gas transmission and power services) and of Exelon Corporation (an energy company focused on power services), and as a member of the Board of Overseers of the Boston Symphony Orchestra. Prior to August 2007, he served as a Director of National Grid (a UK-based holding company with interests in electric and gas transmission and distribution and telecommunications infrastructure). Prior to July 2006, he served as President of the Yale University Council. Prior to February 2005, he served on the board of the White-head Institute for Biomedical Research (a non-profit research institution). Prior to February 2002, he was a Director of State Farm Indemnity Company (an automobile insurance company), and prior to March 2000, he was a Director of New England Electric System (a public utility holding company).

Dr. Joskow has published six books and numerous articles on industrial organization, government regulation of industry, and competition policy. He is active in industry restructuring, environmental, energy, competition, and privatization policies —serving as an advisor to governments and corporations worldwide. Dr. Joskow holds a Ph.D. and MPhil from Yale University and a B.A. from Cornell University.

Elizabeth T. Kennan

Born 1938, Trustee since 1992

Dr. Kennan is a Partner of Cambus-Kenneth Farm (thoroughbred horse and cattle breeding). She is President Emeritus of Mount Holyoke College.

Dr. Kennan served as Chairman and is now Lead Director of Northeast Utilities. She is a Trustee of the National Trust for Historic Preservation and of Centre College in Danville, Kentucky. Until 2006, she was a member of The Trustees of Reservations. Prior to 2001, Dr. Kennan served on the oversight committee of the Folger Shakespeare Library. Prior to June 2005, she was a Director of Talbots, Inc., and she has served as Director on a number of other boards, including Bell Atlantic, Chastain Real Estate, Shawmut Bank, Berkshire Life Insurance, and Kentucky Home Life Insurance. Dr. Kennan has also served as President of Five Colleges Incorporated and as a Trustee of the University of Notre Dame, and is active in various educational and civic associations.

As a member of the faculty of Catholic University for twelve years, until 1978, Dr. Kennan directed the post-doctoral program in Patristic and Medieval Studies, taught history, and published numerous articles and two books. Dr. Kennan holds a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in Seattle, an M.A. from Oxford University, and an A.B. from Mount Holyoke College. She holds several honorary doctorates.

Kenneth R. Leibler

Born 1949, Trustee since 2006

Mr. Leibler is a founder and former Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange, an electronic marketplace for the trading of derivative securities.

Mr. Leibler currently serves as a Trustee of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston. He is also Lead Director of Ruder Finn Group, a global communications and advertising firm, and a Director of Northeast Utilities, which operates New England’s largest energy delivery system. Prior to December 2006, he served as a Director of the Optimum Funds group.

Prior to October 2006, he served as a Director of ISO New England, the organization responsible for the operation of the electric generation system in the New England states. Prior to 2000, Mr. Leibler was a Director of the Investment Company Institute in Washington, D.C.

Prior to January 2005, Mr. Leibler served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Boston Stock Exchange. Prior to January 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Financial Companies, a publicly traded diversified asset management organization. Prior to June 1990, Mr. Leibler served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the American Stock Exchange (AMEX), and at the time was the youngest person in AMEX history to hold the title of President. Prior to serving as AMEX President, he held the position of Chief Financial Officer, and headed its management and marketing operations.

Mr. Leibler graduated magna cum laude with a degree in Economics from Syracuse University, where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa.

Robert E. Patterson

Born 1945, Trustee since 1984

Mr. Patterson is Senior Partner of Cabot Properties, LP and Chairman of Cabot Properties, Inc. (a private equity firm investing in commercial real estate).

Mr. Patterson serves as Chairman Emeritus and Trustee of the Joslin Diabetes Center. Prior to June 2003, he was a Trustee of Sea Education Association. Prior to December 2001, Mr. Patterson was President and Trustee of Cabot Industrial Trust (a publicly traded real estate investment trust). Prior to February 1998, he was Executive Vice President and Director of Acquisitions of Cabot Partners Limited Partnership (a registered investment adviser involved in institutional real estate investments). Prior to 1990, he served as Executive Vice President of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Realty Advisors, Inc. (the predecessor company of Cabot Partners).

Mr. Patterson practiced law and held various positions in state government, and was the founding Executive Director of the Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency. Mr. Patterson is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School.

George Putnam, III

Born 1951, Trustee since 1984

Mr. Putnam is Chairman of New Generation Research, Inc. (a publisher of financial advisory and other research services), and President of New Generation Advisors, Inc. (a registered investment adviser to private funds). Mr. Putnam founded the New Generation companies in 1986.

Mr. Putnam is a Director of The Boston Family Office, LLC (a registered investment adviser). He is a Trustee of St. Mark’s School, a Trustee of Epiphany School, and a Trustee of the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Until 2006, he was a Trustee of Shore Country Day School, and until 2002, was a Trustee of the Sea Education Association.

Mr. Putnam previously worked as an attorney with the law firm of Dechert LLP (formerly known as Dechert Price & Rhoads) in Philadelphia. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Harvard Business School, and Harvard Law School.

Robert L. Reynolds*

Born 1952, Trustee since 2008 and
President of the Funds since 2009

Mr. Reynolds is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments, a member of Putnam Investments’ Executive Board of Directors, and President of the Putnam Funds. He has more than 30 years of investment and financial services experience.

Prior to joining Putnam Investments in 2008, Mr. Reynolds was Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Fidelity Investments from 2000 to 2007. During this time, he served on the Board of Directors for FMR Corporation, Fidelity Investments Insurance Ltd., Fidelity Investments Canada Ltd., and Fidelity Management Trust Company. He was also a Trustee of the Fidelity Family of Funds. From 1984 to 2000, Mr. Reynolds served in a number of increasingly responsible leadership roles at Fidelity.

Mr. Reynolds serves on several not-for-profit boards, including those of the West Virginia University Foundation, Concord Museum, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Lahey Clinic, and Initiative for a Competitive Inner City in Boston. He is a member of the Chief Executives Club of Boston, the National Innovation Initiative, and the Council on Competitiveness.

Mr. Reynolds received a B.S. in Business Administration/Finance from West Virginia University.

W. Thomas Stephens

Born 1942, Trustee since 2009

Mr. Stephens is a Director of TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd. (an energy infrastructure company). From 1997 to 2008, Mr. Stephens served as a Trustee on the Board of the Putnam Funds, which he rejoined as a Trustee in 2009.

Mr. Stephens retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (a paper, forest products, and timberland assets company) in December 2008. Until 2004, Mr. Stephens was a Director of Xcel Energy Incorporated (a public utility company), Qwest Communications, and Norske Canada, Inc. (a paper manufacturer). Until 2003, Mr. Stephens was a Director of Mail-Well, Inc. (a diversified printing company). He served as Chairman of Mail-Well until 2001 and as CEO of MacMillan Bloedel, Ltd. (a forest products company) until 1999. Prior to 1996, Mr. Stephens was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johns Manville Corporation.

He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Arkansas.

Richard B. Worley

Born 1945, Trustee since 2004

Mr. Worley is Managing Partner of Permit Capital LLC, an investment management firm.

Mr. Worley serves as a Trustee of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (a philanthropic organization devoted

to health-care issues), and the National Constitution Center. He is also a Director of The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (a historical preservation organization), and the Philadelphia Orchestra Association. Mr. Worley also serves on the Investment committees of Mount Holyoke College and World Wildlife Fund (a wildlife conservation organization).

Prior to joining Permit Capital LLC in 2002, Mr. Worley served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management and as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley, a financial services firm. Mr. Worley also was the Chairman of Miller Anderson & Sherrerd, an investment management firm that was acquired by Morgan Stanley in 1996.

Mr. Worley holds a B.S. from the University of Tennessee and pursued graduate studies in economics at the University of Texas.

The address of each Trustee is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

As of June 30, 2009, there were over 100 Putnam funds. All Trustees serve as Trustees of all Putnam funds.

Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until his or her resignation, retirement at age 72, death, or removal.

* Trustee who is an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the fund, Putnam Management, and/or Putnam Retail Management. Mr. Reynolds is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments, as well as the President of your fund and each of the other Putnam funds.

Officers

In addition to Robert L. Reynolds, the other officers of the fund are shown below:


Charles E. Porter (Born 1938)	James P. Pappas (Born 1953)	Wanda M. McManus (Born 1947)
Executive Vice President, Principal	Vice President	Vice President, Senior Associate
Executive Officer, Associate Treasurer,	Since 2004	Treasurer and Assistant Clerk
and Compliance Liaison	Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Since 2005
Since 1989	and Putnam Management. During 2002,	Senior Associate Treasurer/Assistant Clerk
	Chief Operating Officer, Atalanta/Sosnoff	of Funds
Jonathan S. Horwitz (Born 1955)	Management Corporation
Senior Vice President and Treasurer		Nancy E. Florek (Born 1957)
Since 2004	Francis J. McNamara, III (Born 1955)	Vice President, Assistant Clerk,
Prior to 2004, Managing Director,	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer	Assistant Treasurer and Proxy Manager
Putnam Investments	Since 2004	Since 2005
	Senior Managing Director, Putnam	Manager, Mutual Fund Proxy Voting
Steven D. Krichmar (Born 1958)	Investments, Putnam Management and
Vice President and	Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2004,
Principal Financial Officer	General Counsel, State Street Research &
Since 2002	Management Company
Senior Managing Director,
Putnam Investments	Robert R. Leveille (Born 1969)
	Vice President and
Janet C. Smith (Born 1965)	Chief Compliance Officer
Vice President, Principal Accounting	Since 2007
Officer and Assistant Treasurer	Managing Director, Putnam Investments,
Since 2007	Putnam Management, and Putnam Retail
Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Management. Prior to 2004, member of
and Putnam Management	Bell Boyd & Lloyd LLC. Prior to 2003,
	Vice President and Senior Counsel,
Susan G. Malloy (Born 1957)	Liberty Funds Group LLC
Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
Since 2007	Mark C. Trenchard (Born 1962)
Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Vice President and
	BSA Compliance Officer
Beth S. Mazor (Born 1958)	Since 2002
Vice President	Managing Director, Putnam Investments
Since 2002
Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Judith Cohen (Born 1945)
	Vice President,
	Clerk and Assistant Treasurer
	Since 1993

The address of each Officer is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

The Putnam Family of Funds

The following is a list of Putnam’s open-end mutual funds offered to the public. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund before investing. For a prospectus containing this and other information for any Putnam fund or product, call your financial advisor at 1-800-225-1581 and ask for a prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

Growth
Growth Opportunities Fund
International New Opportunities Fund*
New Opportunities Fund
Small Cap Growth Fund*
Vista Fund
Voyager Fund

Blend
Asia Pacific Equity Fund*
Capital Opportunities Fund*
Capital Spectrum Fund‡‡
Emerging Markets Equity Fund*
Equity Spectrum Fund‡‡
Europe Equity Fund*
Global Equity Fund*
International Capital Opportunities Fund*
International Equity Fund*
Investors Fund
Research Fund

Value
Convertible Income-Growth Trust
Equity Income Fund
The George Putnam Fund of Boston
The Putnam Fund for Growth and Income
International Growth and Income Fund*
Mid Cap Value Fund
Small Cap Value Fund*

Income
American Government Income Fund
Diversified Income Trust
Floating Rate Income Fund
Global Income Trust*
High Yield Advantage Fund*
High Yield Trust*
Income Fund
Money Market Fund†
U.S. Government Income Trust

Tax-free income
AMT-Free Municipal Fund‡
Tax Exempt Income Fund
Tax Exempt Money Market Fund†
Tax-Free High Yield Fund

State tax-free income funds:
Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania

Absolute Return
Absolute Return 100 Fund
Absolute Return 300 Fund
Absolute Return 500 Fund
Absolute Return 700 Fund

Global Sector*
Global Consumer Fund
Global Energy Fund
Global Financials Fund
Global Health Care Fund**
Global Industrials Fund
Global Natural Resources Fund
Global Technology Fund
Global Telecommunications Fund
Global Utilities Fund††

Asset allocation
Income Strategies Fund
Putnam Asset Allocation Funds — three investment portfolios that spread your money across a variety of stocks, bonds, and money market investments.

The three portfolios:
Asset Allocation: Balanced Portfolio
Asset Allocation: Conservative Portfolio
Asset Allocation: Growth Portfolio

Putnam RetirementReady®
Putnam RetirementReady Funds — 10 investment portfolios that offer diversification among stocks, bonds, and money market instruments and adjust to become more conservative over time based on a target date for withdrawing assets.

The 10 funds:
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2045 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2020 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2015 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2010 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund

* A 1% redemption fee on total assets redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of purchase may be imposed for all share classes of these funds.

† An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

‡ Prior to November 30, 2008, the fund was known as Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund.

** Prior to January 2, 2009, the fund was known as Putnam Health Sciences Trust.

†† Prior to January 2, 2009, the fund was known as Putnam Utilities Growth and Income Fund.

‡‡ A 1% redemption fee on total assets redeemed or exchanged within 30 days of purchase may be imposed for all share classes of these funds.

With the exception of money market funds, a 1% redemption fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase (90 days, for certain funds).

Check your account balances and the most recent month-end performance in the Individual Investors section at putnam.com.

Services for shareholders

Investor services

Systematic investment plan Tell us how much you wish to invest regularly — weekly, semimonthly, or monthly — and the amount you choose will be transferred automatically from your checking or savings account. There’s no additional fee for this service, and you can suspend it at any time. This plan may be a great way to save for college expenses or to plan for your retirement.

Please note that regular investing does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss in a declining market. Before arranging a systematic investment plan, consider your financial ability to continue making purchases in periods when prices are low.

Systematic exchange You can make regular transfers from one Putnam fund to another Putnam fund. There are no additional fees for this service, and you can cancel or change your options at any time.

Dividends PLUS You can choose to have the dividend distributions from one of your Putnam funds automatically reinvested in another Putnam fund at no additional charge.

Free exchange privilege You can exchange money between Putnam funds free of charge, as long as they are the same class of shares. A signature guarantee is required if you are exchanging more than $500,000.

Reinstatement privilege If you’ve sold Putnam shares or received a check for a dividend or capital gain, you may reinvest the proceeds with Putnam within 90 days of the transaction and they will be reinvested at the fund’s current net asset value — with no sales charge. However, reinstatement of class B shares may have special tax consequences. Ask your financial or tax representative for details.

Check-writing service You have ready access to many Putnam accounts. It’s as simple as writing a check, and there are no special fees or service charges. For more information about the check-writing service, call Putnam or visit our Web site.

Dollar cost averaging When you’re investing for long-term goals, it’s time, not timing, that counts. Investing on a systematic basis is a better strategy than trying to figure out when the markets will go up or down. This means investing the same amount of money regularly over a long period. This method of investing is called dollar cost averaging. When a fund’s share price declines, your investment dollars buy more shares at lower prices. When it increases, they buy fewer shares. Over time, you will pay a lower average price per share.

For more information

Visit the Individual Investors section at putnam.com

A secure section of our Web site contains complete information on your account, including balances and transactions, updated daily. You may also conduct transactions, such as exchanges, additional investments, and address changes. Log on today to get your password.

Call us toll free at 1-800-225-1581 Ask a helpful Putnam representative or your financial advisor for details about any of these or other services, or see your prospectus.

Fund information

Founded over 70 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 mutual funds across income, value, blend, growth, asset allocation, absolute return, and global sector categories.


Investment Manager	Myra R. Drucker	Francis J. McNamara, III
Putnam Investment	Paul L. Joskow	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Management, LLC	Elizabeth T. Kennan
One Post Office Square	Kenneth R. Leibler	Robert R. Leveille
Boston, MA 02109	Robert E. Patterson	Vice President and
	George Putnam, III	Chief Compliance Officer
Investment Sub-Manager	Robert L. Reynolds
Putnam Investments Limited	W. Thomas Stephens	Mark C. Trenchard
57–59 St James’s Street	Richard B. Worley	Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer
London, England SW1A 1LD
	Officers	Judith Cohen
Investment Sub-Advisor	Robert L. Reynolds	Vice President, Clerk and
The Putnam Advisory	President	Assistant Treasurer
Company, LLC
One Post Office Square	Charles E. Porter	Wanda M. McManus
Boston, MA 02109	Executive Vice President, Principal	Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer
	Executive Officer, Associate Treasurer	and Assistant Clerk
Marketing Services	and Compliance Liaison
Putnam Retail Management		Nancy E. Florek
One Post Office Square	Jonathan S. Horwitz	Vice President, Assistant Clerk, Assistant
Boston, MA 02109	Senior Vice President and Treasurer	Treasurer and Proxy Manager

Custodian	Steven D. Krichmar
State Street Bank and Trust Company	Vice President and
	Principal Financial Officer
Legal Counsel
Ropes & Gray LLP	Janet C. Smith
	Vice President, Principal Accounting
Independent Registered Public	Officer and Assistant Treasurer
Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP	Susan G. Malloy
	Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
Trustees
John A. Hill, Chairman	Beth S. Mazor
Jameson A. Baxter, Vice Chairman	Vice President
Ravi Akhoury
Charles B. Curtis	James P. Pappas
Robert J. Darretta	Vice President

This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam International Growth and Income Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.

This page left blank intentionally.

Item 2. Code of Ethics:

(a) The fund’s principal executive, financial and accounting officers are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager. As such they are subject to a comprehensive Code of Ethics adopted and administered by Putnam Investments which is designed to protect the interests of the firm and its clients. The Fund has adopted a Code of Ethics which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments with respect to all of its officers and Trustees who are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC. For this reason, the Fund has not adopted a separate code of ethics governing its principal executive, financial and accounting officers.

(c) In May 2008, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investment Management, LLC was updated in its entirety to include the amendments adopted in August 2007 as well as a several additional technical, administrative and non-substantive changes. In May of 2009, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investment Management, LLC was amended to reflect that all employees will now be subject to a 90-day blackout restriction on holding Putnam open-end funds, except for portfolio managers and their supervisors (and each of their immediate family members), who will be subject to a one-year blackout restriction on the funds that they manage or supervise.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:

The Funds' Audit and Compliance Committee is comprised solely of Trustees who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The Trustees believe that each of the members of the Audit and Compliance Committee also possess a combination of knowledge and experience with respect to financial accounting matters, as well as other attributes, that qualify them for service on the Committee. In addition, the Trustees have determined that each of Mr. Patterson, Mr. Leibler, Mr. Hill, Mr. Darretta and Mr. Stephens qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) based on their review of his pertinent experience and education. The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit and Compliance Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:

The following table presents fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to the fund by the fund’s independent auditor:


Fiscal		Audit-
year	Audit	Related	Tax	All Other
ended	Fees	Fees	Fees	Fees

June 30, 2009	$90,790	$--	$8,828	$869*
June 30, 2008	$88,373	$--	$8,623	$336*

* Includes fees of $869 and $336 billed by the fund’s independent auditor to the fund for procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. These fees were reimbursed to the fund by Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”).

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, the fund’s independent auditor billed aggregate non-audit fees in the amounts of $476,522 and $56,021 respectively, to the fund, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.

Audit Fees represent fees billed for the fund's last two fiscal years relating to the audit and review of the financial statements included in annual reports and registration statements, and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for services traditionally performed by the fund’s auditor, including accounting consultation for proposed transactions or concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice services. Tax planning and tax advice services include assistance with tax audits, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.

All Other Fees represent procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters.

Pre-Approval Policies of the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Putnam funds has determined that, as a matter of policy, all work performed for the funds by the funds’ independent auditors will be pre-approved by the Committee itself and thus will generally not be subject to pre-approval procedures.

The Audit and Compliance Committee also has adopted a policy to pre-approve the engagement by Putnam Management and certain of its affiliates of the funds’ independent auditors, even in circumstances where pre-approval is not required by applicable law. Any such requests by Putnam Management or certain of its affiliates are typically submitted in writing to the Committee and explain, among other things, the nature of the proposed engagement, the estimated fees, and why this work should be performed by that particular audit firm as opposed to another one. In reviewing such requests, the Committee considers, among other things, whether the provision of such services by the audit firm are compatible with the independence of the audit firm.

The following table presents fees billed by the fund’s independent auditor for services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


Fiscal	Audit-		All	Total
year	Related	Tax	Other	Non-Audit
ended	Fees	Fees	Fees	Fees

June 30, 2009	$ -	$ 400,341	$ -	$ -
June 30, 2008	$ -	$ 15,000	$ -	$ -

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not applicable

Item 6. Schedule of Investments:

The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:

Not applicable

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies

Not Applicable

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:

Not applicable

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:

Not applicable

Item 11. Controls and Procedures:

(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable

Item 12. Exhibits:

(a)(1) The Code of Ethics of The Putnam Funds, which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments, is filed herewith.

(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Putnam Funds Trust

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith

Principal Accounting Officer

Date: August 28, 2009

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer

Date: August 28, 2009

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 28, 2009


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: (811- 07513)

Exact name of registrant as specified in charter:	Putnam Funds Trust

Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Name and address of agent for service:	Beth S. Mazor, Vice President
	One Post Office Square
	Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Copy to:	John W. Gerstmayr, Esq.
	Ropes & Gray LLP
	One International Place
	Boston, Massachusetts 02110

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(617) 292-1000

Date of fiscal year end: June 30, 2009

Date of reporting period: July 1, 2008 — June 30, 2009

Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:

A BALANCED APPROACH

Since 1937, when George Putnam created a diverse mix of stocks and bonds in a single, professionally managed portfolio, Putnam has championed the balanced approach.

A WORLD OF INVESTING

Today, we offer investors a world of equity, fixed-income, multi-asset, and absolute-return portfolios to suit a range of financial goals.

A COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE

Putnam
Small Cap
Growth Fund

Annual Report

6|30|09


Message from the Trustees	1
About the fund	2
Performance and portfolio snapshots	4
Interview with your fund’s Portfolio Manager	5
Your fund’s performance	8
Your fund’s expenses	9
Terms and definitions	11
Trustee approval of management contract	12
Other information for shareholders	19
Financial statements	20
Federal tax information	35
About the Trustees	36
Officers	40

Message from the Trustees

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

We would like to take this opportunity to welcome new shareholders to the fund and to thank all of our investors for your continued confidence in Putnam.

About the fund

Seeking companies with new ideas — and big futures

The saying “mighty oaks from tiny acorns grow” could be the motto of Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund. The fund’s manager looks for small companies that he believes have the potential to grow and prosper, at which point the fund can sell the stock at a profit. These companies can be start-ups or several years old. What they generally have in common is the development of a product or service that fills a well-defined need in the marketplace.

Small-capitalization companies can be more nimble than more established firms. They can move quickly to develop a new product or service that captures a customer base with little or no immediate competition. Many are in the early stages of their corporate lives and, if successful, may experience significant growth.

Small-cap stocks generally react differently to economic conditions than their large-cap counterparts, so including both in your portfolio is one way to diversify your holdings. An uptick in the economy can make it easier for startups and smaller companies to acquire capital to finance their operations.

Larger, blue-chip companies are carefully tracked by Wall Street analysts. As a result, investors can readily find information about those companies’ financials and business prospects. In the case of smaller companies, however, there are simply too many stocks and too few analysts for extensive research. This reduced level of coverage means that in-house research, such as that provided by Putnam’s equity analysts, is key to uncovering these “diamonds in the rough.”

Since the inception of Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund in late 1997, the portfolio manager has worked closely with Putnam’s analysts to uncover investment opportunities. With intensive research into a company’s financial health and future prospects, as well as industry trends, fund management uses a variety of resources to identify the small-cap growth candidates that might grow into “mighty oaks.”

Consider these risks before you invest: The fund invests some or all of its assets in small and/or midsize companies. Such investments increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Stocks with above-average earnings growth may be more volatile, especially if earnings do not continue to grow.

In-depth analysis is key to successful stock selection.

Drawing on the expertise of a dedicated team of stock analysts, the fund’s manager seeks attractive growth stocks. Once a stock is selected for the portfolio, it is regularly assessed to ensure that it continues to meet certain criteria, including:

Growth The manager examines each company’s financials, including its sales and earnings, and targets those believed to offer growth potential.

Quality The manager evaluates high-quality companies, with characteristics such as solid management teams, sound business models, and high levels of free-cash flow.

Valuation The manager carefully considers how each stock is valued, seeking stocks whose valuations are attractive relative to the company’s growth potential.

Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund holdings have
spanned many sectors and industries over time.

Performance and
portfolio snapshots

Average annual total return (%) comparison as of 6/30/09

“The portfolio is positioned aggressively for
economic stabilization and recovery.”

Anthony Sutton, Portfolio Manager, Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund

Allocations are represented as a percentage of net assets and may not equal 100%. Holdings and allocations may vary over time.

Interview with your
fund’s Portfolio Manager

Anthony Sutton

Tony, how did Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund perform for the 12-month period that ended June 30, 2009?

It’s been an especially difficult year for equity investors. The fund’s class A shares returned –33.37%, underperforming the –26.93% average return of its Lipper peer group, as well as its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index, which declined 24.85%.

Could you provide some perspective on market conditions during the period, and their effect on the fund?

For most of the final six months of 2008 — the first six months of the fund’s fiscal year — the market for small-cap stocks held up relatively well. In December, however, the global credit crisis hit businesses of all sizes, especially smaller companies. More than large corporations, small companies rely on funding to expand and introduce new products, and this is especially true of growth-oriented companies such as those in the fund. The credit crunch did begin to ease in March 2009. Unfortunately, the stocks that I tend to favor were not the ones that benefited the most from the easing of the credit markets. Rather, the beneficiaries were the highly speculative — and in some cases, nearly bankrupt —low-quality companies whose stocks had fallen so far that any easing of credit actually helped their performance relative to higher-quality growth companies. This is a hallmark of a major bottoming process, one that generally runs its course in two or three quarters, when high-quality growth stocks retake the lead. I feel we are at that point now. Further, I consider low-quality stocks, many of which are in the benchmark, to be too risky for this fund. At the same time, I believe there are a number of positive developments that could help the fund going forward.

What are some of those positive developments?

One is the effort by government policymakers to pump money into the economy. This effort plays to small-cap stocks’ strengths by providing funding for growth, as well as money for new companies. While all this spending raises legitimate concerns about inflation down the road, a moderate increase in inflation can actually benefit small companies. These companies tend to have newer products that they can re-price more quickly than their large-cap competitors.

Also, while this recession has turned out to be deeper and longer than almost anyone expected, I believe we are seeing early signs of recovery. Certain sectors tend to take the lead

Broad market index and fund performance

coming out of recessions, including those most sensitive to economic expansion — often referred to as “early-cycle” sectors. These include consumer-discretionary, materials, and technology companies. Lagging groups tend to be in defensive areas, such as consumer staples and most industries within the health-care sector. Based on the likelihood of increased funding, the potential benefits of moderate inflation, and the outlook for small-cap growth stocks in a post-recessionary environment, I believe the portfolio is well positioned at this time.

IN THE NEWS

Citigroup and General Motors Corp. were removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) in early June. Citigroup was dropped due to its substantial restructuring process, and General Motors because of its bankruptcy, an automatic disqualifier for DJIA membership. Dow Jones & Company, which manages the average, announced that the two companies were replaced by Travelers Companies and Cisco Systems. The DJIA, which consists of 30 stocks, is a widely cited measure of U.S. stock market performance. When the index was introduced 113 years ago, it included just 12 industrial companies. In 1928, it expanded to 30 stocks, and a divisor was introduced to adjust for the effects of stock splits, stock distributions, and stock substitutions. Index components change on a regular basis for varying reasons; the most recent modification occurred in September 2008, when Kraft Foods replaced American International Group. General Electric is the only stock in the current DJIA that was part of the original index in 1896.

What were some of the holdings that detracted from performance over the past 12 months?

Stocks of energy services companies fell dramatically after oil prices declined, leading to a slowdown in spending on oil and gas exploration and production. Some of the biggest detractors in the portfolio were Hercules Offshore, an oil and gas driller and servicing company; Hornbeck Offshore Services, a manufacturer of maritime vehicles serving the offshore oil and gas market; Rex Energy, an oil and gas exploration and production company; and Bolt Technology, a manufacturer of products used in offshore oil and gas exploration. My belief that energy services companies would be negatively impacted by slower spending caused me to sell all of these positions except Bolt Technology, a company with unique products that can help it ride out difficult environments. Meanwhile, several companies in the industrial sector also detracted from returns. These companies also benefited from higher energy prices; but as energy prices fell, so did the attractiveness of their products. Detractors in this sector included Akeena Solar, a solar power systems designer; Hill International, a project management company serving the

Top 10 holdings


HOLDING (percentage of fund’s net assets)	SECTOR	INDUSTRY

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (3.1%)	Technology	Computers
F5 Networks, Inc. (2.0%)	Technology	Communications equipment
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (1.9%)	Consumer cyclicals	Retail
IPC The Hospitalist Co., Inc. (1.8%)	Health care	Health-care services
ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (1.8%)	Technology	Communications equipment
Acme Packet, Inc. (1.6%)	Technology	Computers
EZCORP, Inc. Class A (1.5%)	Consumer cyclicals	Commercial and consumer services
NeuStar, Inc. Class A (1.5%)	Communication services	Telecommunications
Concho Resources, Inc. (1.4%)	Energy	Oil and gas
SWS Group, Inc. (1.4%)	Financials	Investment banking/Brokerage

This table shows the fund’s top 10 holdings and the percentage of the fund’s net assets that each represented as of 6/30/09. Also shown is each holding’s market sector and the specific industry within that sector. Holdings will vary over time.

energy construction industry overseas, predominately the Middle East; and EnerSys, which manufacturers and sells industrial batteries. All of these stocks were sold from the portfolio before the end of the period.

Which stocks in the portfolio contributed to performance?

Some of the top contributors were in the technology sector, including Brocade Communications, which makes computer-networking equipment; TeleCommunication Systems, a provider of wireless data communications technology; and F5 Networks, a computer data management company. The portfolio also benefited from some of its health-care holdings, including IPC The Hospitalist Company, a company that provides hospitalists (specialist physicians) who act as liaisons between hospital patients and doctors, to manage care and costs; Healthcare Services Group, a company that provides janitorial services to nursing homes; and Volcano Corporation, a health-care equipment manufacturer at the forefront of vascular and heart-structure technology. By the close of the period, TeleCommunication Systems had been sold from the portfolio because its valuation exceeded our targets and we felt greater returns could be found elsewhere.

What is your outlook as we begin the fund’s next fiscal year?

There are a number of factors I find encouraging. I expect the massive government spending effort will begin to take hold more firmly in the second half of 2009, and will continue into next year. Thus, the portfolio is positioned aggressively for economic stabilization and recovery. We have, for example, increased the fund’s holdings of technology and consumer cyclical stocks since the end of 2008. Meanwhile, the portfolio’s exposure to more defensive sectors, such as health care and consumer staples, has been reduced. Of course, there are still risks, including the possibility that consumer spending will not recover for some time. However, our decisions regarding sector rotation continue to be a product of our investment process in which the primary focus is on fundamental research and individual stock selection.

Tony, thank you for your time and insights today.

The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.

Anthony Sutton is a Portfolio Manager at Putnam. He has an M.B.A. from the MIT Sloan School of Management and a B.S. from Monmouth University. Anthony joined Putnam in 2001 and has been in the investment industry since 1989.

Anthony may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.

Comparison of top sector weightings

This chart shows how the fund’s top weightings have changed over the past six months. Weightings are shown as a percentage of net assets. Holdings will vary over time.

Your fund’s performance

Fund performance Total return for periods ended 6/30/09


	Class A		Class B		Class C		Class M		Class R	Class Y
(inception dates)	(12/31/97)		(3/18/02)		(3/18/02)		(3/18/02)		(12/1/03)	(11/3/03)

	NAV	POP	NAV	CDSC	NAV	CDSC	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV

Annual average (life of fund)	7.52%	6.96%	6.72%	6.72%	6.72%	6.72%	6.99%	6.66%	7.26%	7.65%

10 years	30.37	22.85	20.95	20.95	20.96	20.96	24.16	19.78	27.36	32.21
Annual average	2.69	2.08	1.92	1.92	1.92	1.92	2.19	1.82	2.45	2.83

5 years	–25.09	–29.39	–27.82	–28.91	–27.81	–27.81	–26.92	–29.49	–25.95	–24.14
Annual average	–5.61	–6.72	–6.31	–6.60	–6.31	–6.31	–6.08	–6.75	–5.83	–5.38

3 years	–37.96	–41.53	–39.34	–40.81	–39.31	–39.31	–38.87	–41.00	–38.38	–37.48
Annual average	–14.71	–16.38	–15.35	–16.04	–15.33	–15.33	–15.13	–16.13	–14.90	–14.49

1 year	–33.37	–37.21	–33.89	–37.19	–33.85	–34.51	–33.70	–36.02	–33.51	–33.24

For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.

Due to market volatility, current performance may be higher or lower than performance shown.

A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 90 days of purchase.

Change in the value of a $10,000 investment ($9,425 after sales charge) Cumulative total return from 6/30/99 to 6/30/09

Past performance does not indicate future results. At the end of the same time period, a $10,000 investment in the fund’s class B and class C shares would have been valued at $12,095 and $12,096, respectively, and no contingent deferred sales charges would apply. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class M shares ($9,650 after sales charge) would have been valued at $11,978 at public offering price. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class R and class Y shares would have been valued at $12,736 and $13,221, respectively.

Comparative index returns For periods ended 6/30/09


		Lipper Small-Cap Growth
	Russell 2000 Growth Index	Funds category average*

Annual average (life of fund)	0.49%	2.21%

10 years	–8.54	14.37
Annual average	–0.89	0.77

5 years	–6.45	–10.52
Annual average	–1.32	–2.36

3 years	–21.71	–25.31
Annual average	–7.83	–9.42

1 year	–24.85	–26.93

Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.

* Over the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 6/30/09, there were 578, 498, 412, 214, and 168 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.

Fund price and distribution information For the 12-month period ended 6/30/09


	Class A		Class B	Class C	Class M		Class R	Class Y

Share value	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV

6/30/08	$17.17	$18.22	$16.20	$16.19	$16.53	$17.13	$16.95	$17.42

6/30/09	11.44	12.14	10.71	10.71	10.96	11.36	11.27	11.63

The classification of distributions, if any, is an estimate. Final distribution information will appear on your year-end tax forms.

The fund made no distributions during the period.

Your fund’s expenses

Expense ratios


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Net expenses for the fiscal year ended 6/30/08*	1.52%	2.27%	2.27%	2.02%	1.77%	1.27%

Your fund's total annual operating expenses for the	1.72%	2.47%	2.47%	2.22%	1.97%	1.47%
fiscal year ended 6/30/08

Your fund’s annualized expense ratio for the	1.47%	2.22%	2.22%	1.97%	1.72%	1.22%
six-month period ended 6/30/09 †

* Reflects Putnam Management’s decision to contractually limit expenses through 6/30/09.

† For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights.

Fiscal year expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown for the annualized expense ratio and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.

Expenses per $1,000

The following table shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund from January 1, 2009, to June 30, 2009. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Expenses paid per $1,000*	$7.37	$11.12	$11.12	$9.87	$8.63	$6.12

Ending value (after expenses)	$1,023.30	$1,020.00	$1,020.00	$1,021.40	$1,022.70	$1,024.70

Estimate the expenses you paid

Compare expenses using the SEC’s method


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Expenses paid per $1,000*	$7.35	$11.08	$11.08	$9.84	$8.60	$6.11

Ending value (after expenses)	$1,017.50	$1,013.79	$1,013.79	$1,015.03	$1,016.27	$1,018.74

Terms and definitions

Important terms

Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.

Share classes

Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).

Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.

Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.

Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).

Class R shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC and are available only to certain defined contribution plans.

Comparative indexes

Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.

Merrill Lynch U.S. 3-Month Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.

Russell 2000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the small-cap Russell 2000 Index chosen for their growth orientation.

S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.

Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Trustee approval of management contract

General conclusions

The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:

Consideration of strategic pricing proposal

The Trustees were mindful of the significant changes that had occurred at Putnam Management in the past two years, including a change of ownership, the installation of a new senior management team at Putnam Management, the substantial decline in assets under management resulting from extraordinary market forces as well as continued net redemptions in many funds, the introduction of new fund products representing novel investment strategies and the introduction of performance fees for certain new funds. The Trustees were also mindful that many other leading firms in the industry had also been experiencing significant challenges due to the changing financial and competitive environment. For these reasons, even though the Trustees believed that the current contractual arrangements in place between the funds and Putnam Management and its affiliates have served shareholders well and continued to be appropriate for the near term, the Trustees believed that it was an appropriate time to reconsider the current structure of the funds’ contractual arrangements with Putnam Management with a view to possible changes that might better serve the interests of shareholders in this new environment. The Trustees concluded their review of Putnam Management’s strategic pricing proposal in July 2009, and their considerations regarding the proposal are discussed below under the heading “Subsequent approval of strategic pricing proposal.” With the exception of the discussion under this heading, the following discussion generally addresses only the Trustees’ reasons for recommending the continuance of the current contractual arrangements as, at the time the Trustees determined to make this

recommendation, the Trustees had not yet reached any conclusions with respect to the strategic pricing proposal.

Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses

• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 38th percentile in management fees and in the 45th percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2008 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds).

• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of the fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as the fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as the fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at that time but, as noted above, were in the process of reviewing a proposal to eliminate individual fund breakpoints for all of the open-end funds (except for the Putnam RetirementReady® Funds and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund) in favor of a breakpoint structure based on the aggregate net assets of all such funds.

In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services provided and profits realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from their contractual relationships with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis.

Investment performance

performance by the work of the Investment Oversight Coordinating Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which had met on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognized that this does not guarantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.

In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds) for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2009 (the first percentile being the best-performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst-performing funds):


One-year period	82nd

Three-year period	91st

Five-year period	82nd

Over the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2009, there were 593, 506, and 413 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

2. Clarified Putnam Management’s investment process by affirming a fundamental driven approach to investing, with quantitative analysis providing additional input for investment decisions;

4. Realigned compensation structure for portfolio managers and research analysts so that only those who achieve top-quartile returns over a rolling three-year basis are eligible for full bonuses.

The Trustees noted the disappointing performance for your fund for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended March 31, 2009. In this regard, in addition to initiatives 1, 2 and 4 described above, the Trustees considered that in November 2008, an existing portfolio manager took over sole responsibility for managing the fund’s investments.

Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits

at Putnam Management’s request, to the Putnam funds’ brokerage allocation policy commencing in 2009, which increased the permitted soft dollar allocation to third-party services over what had been authorized in previous years. The Trustees noted that a portion of available soft dollars continue to be allocated to the payment of fund expenses, although the amount allocated for this purpose has declined in recent years. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor regulatory developments in this area with the assistance of their Brokerage Committee and also indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage and trends in industry practice to ensure that the principle of seeking best price and execution remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.

Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules

Subsequent approval of strategic pricing proposal

• Considerations relating to Fund Family fee rate calculations. The Independent Trustees considered that the proposed management contracts would change the manner in which fund shareholders share in potential economies of scale associated with the management of the funds. Under the current management contracts, shareholders of a fund benefit from increased fund size through reductions in the effective management fee paid to Putnam Management once the fund’s net assets exceed the first breakpoint in the fund’s fee schedule ($500 million for most funds). Conversely, in the case of funds with net assets above the level of the first breakpoint, the effective management fee increases as the fund’s average net assets decline below a breakpoint. These breakpoints are measured solely by the net assets of each individual fund and are not affected by possible growth (or decline) of net assets of other funds in the Fund Family. (“Fund Family” for purposes of this discussion refers to all open-end mutual funds sponsored by Putnam Management, except for the Putnam RetirementReady® Funds and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund.) Under the proposed management contracts, potential economies of scale would be shared ratably among shareholders of all funds, regardless of their size. The management fees paid by a fund (and indirectly by shareholders) would no longer be affected by the growth (or decline) of assets of the particular fund, but rather would be affected solely by the growth (or decline) of the aggregate net assets of all funds in the Fund Family, regardless of whether the net assets of the particular fund are growing or declining.


Name of Fund	Proposed Effective Contractual Rate	Current Effective Contractual Rate	Difference

Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	0.642%	1.000%	(0.358%)

The Independent Trustees considered the extent to which Putnam Management may realize economies of scale in connection with the management of the funds. In this regard, they considered the possibility that such economies of scale as may exist in the management of mutual funds may be associated more closely with the size of the aggregate assets of the mutual fund complex than with the size of any individual fund. In this regard the Independent Trustees considered the financial information provided to them by Putnam Management over a period of many years regarding the allocation of costs involved in calculating the profitability of its mutual fund business as a whole and the profitability of individual funds. The Independent Trustees noted that the methodologies for such cost allocations had been reviewed on a number of occasions in the past by independent financial consultants engaged by the Independent Trustees. The Independent

Trustees noted that these methodologies support Putnam Management’s assertion that many of its operating costs and any associated economies of scale are related more to the aggregate net assets under management in various sectors of its business than to the size of individual funds. They noted that on a number of occasions in the past the Independent Trustees had separately considered the possibility of calculating management fees in whole or in part based on aggregate net assets of the Putnam funds.

• Considerations relating to addition of fee rate adjustments based on investment performance for certain funds. The Independent Trustees considered that Putnam’s proposal to add fee rate adjustments based on investment performance to the management contracts of certain funds reflected a desire by Putnam Management to align its fee revenues more closely with investment performance in the case of certain funds. They noted that Putnam Management already has a significant financial interest in achieving good performance results for the funds it manages. Putnam Management’s fees are based on the assets under its management (whether calculated on an individual fund or complex-wide basis). Good performance results in higher asset levels and therefore higher revenues to Putnam Management. Moreover, good performance also tends to attract additional investors to particular funds or the complex generally, also resulting in higher revenues. Nevertheless, the Independent Trustees concluded that adjusting management fees based on performance for certain selected funds could provide additional benefits to shareholders.

The Independent Trustees noted that Putnam Management proposed the addition of performance adjustments only for certain of the funds and considered whether similar adjustments might be appropriate for other funds. In this regard, they considered Putnam Management’s belief that the addition of performance adjustments would be most appropriate for shareholders of U.S. growth funds, including your fund, international equity funds and Putnam Global Equity Fund. They also considered Putnam Management’s view that it would continue to monitor whether performance fees would be appropriate for other funds. Accordingly, the Independent Trustees concluded that it would be desirable to gain further experience with the operation of performance adjustments for certain funds and the market’s receptivity to such fee structures before giving further consideration to whether similar performance adjustments would be appropriate for other funds as well.

• Considerations relating to standardization of payment terms. The proposed management contracts for all funds provide that management fees will be computed and paid monthly within 15 days after the end of each month. The current contracts of the funds contain quarterly computation and payment terms in some cases. These differences largely reflect practices in place at earlier times when many of the funds were first organized. Under the proposed contract, certain funds would make payments to Putnam Management earlier than they do under their current contract. This would reduce a fund’s opportunity to earn income on accrued but unpaid management fees by a small amount, but would not have a material effect on a fund’s operating costs.

• Considerations relating to comparisons with management fees and total expenses of competitive funds. As part of their evaluation of the proposed management contracts, the Independent Trustees also reviewed the general approach taken by Putnam Management and the Independent Trustees in recent years in imposing appropriate limits on total fund expenses. As part of the annual contract review process in recent years, Putnam Management agreed to waive fees as needed to limit total fund expenses to a maximum level equal to the average total expenses of comparable competitive funds in the mutual fund industry. In connection with its proposal to implement new management contracts, Putnam Management also proposed, and the Independent Trustees approved, certain changes in this approach that shift the focus from controlling total expenses to imposing separate limits on certain categories of expenses, as required. As a general matter, Putnam Management and the Independent Trustees concluded that management fees for the Putnam funds are competitive with the fees charged by comparable funds in the industry. Nevertheless, the Independent Trustees considered specific management

fee waivers proposed to be implemented as of August 1, 2009 by Putnam Management with respect to the current management fees of certain funds, as well as projected reductions in management fees for almost all funds that would result under the proposed contracts. Putnam Management and the Independent Trustees also agreed to impose separate expense limitations of 37.5 basis points on the general category of shareholder servicing expenses and 20 basis points on the general category of other ordinary operating expenses. These new expense limitations, as well as the fee waivers, were implemented for all funds effective as of August 1, 2009, replacing the expense limitation referred to above.

Other information for shareholders

Putnam’s policy on confidentiality

Proxy voting

Fund portfolio holdings

Trustee and employee fund ownership

Financial statements

These sections of the report, as well as the
accompanying Notes, preceded by the
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm, constitute the fund’s
financial statements.

Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)

Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings —from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal year.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of Putnam Funds Trust and Shareholders of
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) at June 30, 2009, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of investments owned at June 30, 2009 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 13, 2009

The fund’s portfolio 6/30/09


COMMON STOCKS (100.5%)*	Shares	Value

Advertising and marketing services (0.6%)
ValueClick, Inc. †	82,900	$872,108

		872,108
Aerospace and defense (0.7%)
AeroVironment, Inc. †	30,530	942,156

		942,156
Automotive (1.6%)
ArvinMeritor, Inc.	272,000	1,194,080

Oshkosh Corp.	65,000	945,100

		2,139,180
Biotechnology (4.1%)
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. †	24,700	1,015,664

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. † ^S	44,000	529,320

Myriad Genetics, Inc. †	11,477	409,155

Nabi Biopharmaceuticals †	227,798	551,271

Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc. †	220,862	1,133,022

OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. †	13,600	383,928

PDL BioPharma, Inc.	125,000	987,500

Sequenom, Inc. † ^S	94,200	368,322

		5,378,182
Chemicals (2.8%)
Koppers Holdings, Inc.	23,700	624,969

Metabolix, Inc. †	74,600	613,212

W.R. Grace & Co. †	125,900	1,557,383

Zoltek Cos., Inc. † ^S	92,200	896,184

		3,691,748
Coal (1.0%)
Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc.	46,400	1,304,304

		1,304,304
Commercial and consumer services (5.7%)
ABM Industries, Inc.	59,200	1,069,744

Emergency Medical Services Corp. Class A †	14,859	547,108

Exponent, Inc. †	48,800	1,196,088

EZCORP, Inc. Class A †	189,700	2,044,966

Healthcare Services Group, Inc.	63,722	1,139,349

Sotheby’s Holdings, Inc. Class A ^S	116,600	1,645,226

		7,642,481
Communications equipment (4.7%)
ADC Telecommunications, Inc. † ^S	293,900	2,339,444

ARRIS Group, Inc. † ^S	105,500	1,282,880

F5 Networks, Inc. †	75,600	2,615,004

		6,237,328
Computers (11.7%)
Acme Packet, Inc. †	213,700	2,162,644

ANSYS, Inc. † ^S	29,200	909,872

Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. †	534,100	4,176,662

Compellent Technologies, Inc. †	59,079	900,955

Emulex Corp. †	66,000	645,480

LogMeIn, Inc. †	1,050	16,800

National Instruments Corp.	29,300	661,008

Netezza Corp. †	148,700	1,237,184

Riverbed Technolgoy, Inc. †	22,200	514,818

Silicon Graphics International Corp. †	218,300	991,082

SPSS, Inc. †	33,800	1,127,906

SXC Health Solutions Corp. (Canada) †	59,900	1,522,658

Teradata Corp. †	28,500	667,755

		15,534,824
Consumer (1.0%)
Blue Nile, Inc. †	14,200	610,458

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (The) Class A	22,000	771,100

		1,381,558


COMMON STOCKS (100.5%)* cont.	Shares	Value

Consumer finance (0.7%)
Dollar Financial Corp. †	67,100	$925,309

		925,309
Distribution (1.2%)
Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. †	32,900	475,734

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. †	7,050	416,796

Houston Wire & Cable Co. ^S	64,200	764,622

		1,657,152
Electrical equipment (0.2%)
ICx Technologies, Inc. †	53,500	321,000

		321,000
Electronics (5.4%)
American Superconductor Corp. †	51,300	1,346,625

Integrated Device Technology, Inc. †	256,900	1,551,676

International Rectifier Corp. †	46,000	681,260

IXYS Corp.	68,622	694,455

Maxwell Technologies, Inc. †	82,400	1,139,592

Silicon Laboratories, Inc. †	44,900	1,703,506

		7,117,114
Energy (oil field) (1.3%)
Bolt Technology Corp. †	66,600	748,584

Complete Production Services, Inc. †	71,100	452,196

Willbros Group, Inc. †	47,800	597,978

		1,798,758
Energy (other) (1.8%)
Comverge, Inc. †	88,800	1,074,480

Evergreen Solar, Inc. † ^S	219,473	476,256

JA Solar Holdings Co., Ltd. ADR (China) † ^S	151,600	712,520

Real Goods Solar, Inc. Class A †	75,760	196,218

		2,459,474
Engineering and construction (2.1%)
Aecom Technology Corp. †	24,800	793,600

EMCOR Group, Inc. †	44,800	901,376

ENGlobal Corp. †	216,400	1,064,688

		2,759,664
Environmental (2.5%)
Clean Harbors, Inc. †	30,100	1,625,099

Duoyuan Global Water, Inc. ADR (China) †	7,250	176,030

Tetra Tech, Inc. †	52,700	1,509,855

		3,310,984
Forest products and packaging (1.2%)
Rock-Tenn Co. Class A	41,000	1,564,560

		1,564,560
Health-care services (5.5%)
athenahealth, Inc. † ^S	27,000	999,270

IPC The Hospitalist Co., Inc. †	90,289	2,409,813

Medidata Solutions, Inc. †	36,371	595,757

Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. † ^S	44,600	598,978

Parexel International Corp. †	41,956	603,327

Quality Systems, Inc. ^S	15,500	882,880

United Therapeutics Corp. †	15,300	1,274,949

		7,364,974
Homebuilding (0.7%)
Ryland Group, Inc. (The)	52,900	886,604

		886,604
Insurance (0.6%)
First Mercury Financial Corp.	58,200	801,414

		801,414
Investment banking/Brokerage (2.1%)
Evercore Partners, Inc. Class A	42,600	836,664

SWS Group, Inc.	135,813	1,897,308

		2,733,972


COMMON STOCKS (100.5%)* cont.	Shares	Value

Lodging/Tourism (0.3%)
Choice Hotels International, Inc.	13,200	$351,252

		351,252
Machinery (0.9%)
Astec Industries, Inc. †	31,100	923,359

Briggs & Stratton Corp. ^S	23,600	314,824

		1,238,183
Medical technology (4.4%)
Bruker BioSciences Corp. †	142,600	1,320,476

ev3, Inc. †	93,100	998,032

Luminex Corp. †	37,767	700,200

Medical Action Industries, Inc. †	26,700	305,715

Natus Medical, Inc. †	62,300	718,942

NuVasive, Inc. †	24,100	1,074,860

Volcano Corp. †	50,260	702,635

		5,820,860
Metal fabricators (0.4%)
Haynes International, Inc. †	20,800	492,960

		492,960
Metals (1.3%)
Horsehead Holding Corp. †	132,600	987,870

New Gold, Inc. (Canada) †	46,576	124,358

Royal Gold, Inc.	14,200	592,140

		1,704,368
Oil and gas (4.2%)
Approach Resources, Inc. †	57,300	395,370

Arena Resources, Inc. †	31,500	1,003,275

Comstock Resources, Inc. †	22,853	755,292

Concho Resources, Inc. †	67,000	1,922,230

EXCO Resources, Inc. †	67,000	865,640

Rosetta Resources, Inc. †	74,700	653,625

		5,595,432
Pharmaceuticals (1.8%)
Myriad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. †	5	23

Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. †	89,159	1,080,607

Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. †	47,106	464,936

Santarus, Inc. †	309,300	872,226

		2,417,792
Publishing (0.6%)
Marvel Entertainment, Inc. †	22,100	786,539

		786,539
Real estate (1.9%)
Chimera Investment Corp. ^R	210,000	732,900

Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.	22,300	729,879

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers ^R	33,800	1,096,134

		2,558,913
Restaurants (1.7%)
AFC Enterprises †	156,700	1,057,725

Cheesecake Factory, Inc. (The) †	42,700	738,710

Papa John’s International, Inc. †	20,800	515,632

Retail (5.0%)		2,312,067
Chico’s FAS, Inc. †	62,800	611,044

Childrens Place Retail Stores, Inc. (The) †	23,500	621,105


COMMON STOCKS (100.5%)* cont.	Shares	Value

Retail cont.
Hibbett Sports, Inc. †	45,200	$813,600

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. †	122,485	2,531,765

Tractor Supply Co. †	19,100	789,212

Wolverine World Wide, Inc.	58,400	1,288,304

		6,655,030
Semiconductor (2.6%)
ATMI, Inc. †	73,800	1,146,114

Cymer, Inc. †	49,200	1,462,716

Formfactor, Inc. †	46,665	804,505

		3,413,335
Shipping (1.7%)
D/S Norden (Denmark)	24,385	839,266

Diana Shipping, Inc. (Greece) ^S	24,972	332,627

Wabtec Corp.	32,100	1,032,657

		2,204,550
Software (4.0%)
Blackboard, Inc. †	18,400	531,024

MedAssets, Inc. †	66,500	1,293,425

Red Hat, Inc. †	28,500	573,705

THQ, Inc. †	64,500	461,820

TIBCO Software, Inc. †	155,400	1,114,218

Vocus, Inc. †	66,100	1,306,136

		5,280,328
Technology services (2.4%)
Global Sources, Ltd. (Bermuda) †	133,800	964,698

IHS, Inc. Class A †	21,600	1,077,192

Limelight Networks, Inc. †	248,300	1,092,520

		3,134,410
Telecommunications (4.8%)
EchoStar Corp. Class A †	99,800	1,590,812

NeuStar, Inc. Class A †	91,000	2,016,560

Neutral Tandem, Inc. †	20,200	596,304

OpNext, Inc. †	202,900	434,206

Premiere Global Services, Inc. †	78,800	854,192

SAVVIS, Inc. †	72,300	828,558

		6,320,632
Textiles (2.1%)
Gymboree Corp. (The) †	36,100	1,280,828

Phillips-Van Heusen Corp.	51,300	1,471,797

		2,752,625
Waste Management (1.2%)
Calgon Carbon Corp. †	112,000	1,555,680

		1,555,680
Total common stocks (cost $125,076,637)		$133,419,804


UNITS (1.3%)*	Units	Value

OptiSolar Holdings, LLC Class B-1, zero %
sr. cv. pfd. membership units (acquired 7/30/08,
cost $1,698,800) ^F‡†	274,000	$1,698,800

Total units (cost $1,698,800)		$1,698,800


PURCHASED OPTIONS OUTSTANDING (0.1%)*	Expiration date/	Contract
	strike price	amount	Value

Force Protection, Inc. (Call)	Jul-09/$10.00	$138,348	$121,055

Total purchased options outstandings (cost $115,244)			$121,055


SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (8.2%)*	Principal amount	Value

Short-term investments held as collateral for loaned securities with yields ranging
from 0.25% to 0.89% and due dates ranging from July 1, 2009 to August 7, 2009 ^d	$10,880,545	$10,880,177

Total short-term investments (cost $10,880,177)		$10,880,177


TOTAL INVESTMENTS

Total investments (cost $137,770,858)		$146,119,836

* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $132,728,066.

† Non-income-producing security.

‡ Restricted, excluding 144A securities, as to public resale. The total market value of restricted securities held at June 30, 2009 was $1,698,800, or 1.3% of net assets.

^dSee Note 1 to the financial statements.

^FIs valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Securities may be classified as a Level 2 or Level 3 for SFAS 157 disclosures based on the securities valuation inputs. On June 30, 2009, fair value pricing was also used for certain foreign securities in the portfolio (Note 1).

^RReal Estate Investment Trust.

^SSecurities on loan, in part or in entirety, at June 30, 2009.

At June 30, 2009, liquid assets totaling $115,491 have been designated as collateral for open options contracts.

ADR after the name of a foreign holding stands for American Depository Receipts representing ownership of foreign securities on deposit with a custodian bank.


WRITTEN OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AT 6/30/09 (premiums received $80,875)	Contract	Expiration date/
	amount	strike price	Value

Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. (Put)	$51, 996	Sep-09/$12.50	$5,564

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the fund’s net assets as of June 30, 2009:


		Valuation inputs

Investments in securities:	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3

Common stocks:

Basic materials	6,960,676	—	—

Capital goods	10,620,627	—	—

Communication services	6,320,632	—	—

Consumer cyclicals	23,467,377	—	—

Consumer staples	3,969,219	—	—

Energy	11,157,968	—	—

Financials	7,019,608	—	—

Health care	20,981,808	—	—

Technology	40,717,339	—	—

Transportation	1,365,284	839,266	—

Total Common stocks	132,580,538	839,266	—

Units	—	—	1.698,800

Purchased options outstanding	—	121,055	—

Short-term investments	—	10,880,177	—

Totals by level	$132,580,538	$11,840,498	$1,698,800

	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3

Other financial instruments:	$—	$(5,564)	$—

Other financial instruments include futures, written options, TBA sale commitments, swaps and forward contracts.

The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets as of June 30, 2009:


				Change in net
	Balance as of	Accrued		unrealized		Net transfers
	June 30,	discounts/	Realized	appreciation/	Net purchases/	in and/or out	Balance as of
Investments in securities:	2008	premiums	gain/(loss)	(depreciation)	sales	of Level 3	June 30, 2009

Units:	$—	$—	$—	$—	$1,698,800	$—	$1,698,800

Totals:	$—	$—	$—	$—	$1,698,800	$—	$1,698,800

Other financial instruments include futures, written options, TBA sale commitments, swaps and forward contracts.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Statement of assets and liabilities 6/30/09

ASSETS

Investment in securities, at value, including $10,538,929
of securities on loan (Note 1):
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $137,770,858)	$146,119,836

Dividends, interest and other receivables	75,730

Foreign tax reclaim	7,772

Receivable for shares of the fund sold	140,884

Receivable for investments sold	3,627,949

Total assets	149,972,171


LIABILITIES

Payable to custodian (Note 2)	21,001

Payable for investments purchased	5,397,076

Payable for shares of the fund repurchased	479,699

Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2)	209,025

Payable for investor servicing fees (Note 2)	28,277

Payable for custodian fees (Note 2)	15,783

Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)	57,228

Payable for administrative services (Note 2)	1,316

Payable for distribution fees (Note 2)	82,681

Written options outstanding, at value
(premiums received $80,875) (Notes 1 and 3)	5,564

Collateral on securities loaned, at value (Note 1)	10,880,177

Other accrued expenses	66,278

Total liabilities	17,244,105

Net assets	$132,728,066


REPRESENTED BY

Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4)	$271,993,489

Accumulated net realized loss on investments and foreign
currency transactions (Note 1)	(147,690,228)

Net unrealized appreciation of investments and assets and
liabilities in foreign currencies	8,424,805

Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital
shares outstanding	$132,728,066


COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE

Net asset value and redemption price per class A share
($106,055,324 divided by 9,268,449 shares)	$11.44

Offering price per class A share (100/94.25 of $11.44)*	$12.14

Net asset value and offering price per class B share
($7,723,572 divided by 721,055 shares)**	$10.71

Net asset value and offering price per class C share
($5,859,101 divided by 547,269 shares)**	$10.71

Net asset value and redemption price per class M share
($1,085,824 divided by 99,041 shares)	$10.96

Offering price per class M share (100/96.50 of $10.96)*	$11.36

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per
class R share ($4,910,357 divided by 435,786 shares)	$11.27

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per
class Y share ($7,093,888 divided by 609,716 shares)	$11.63

* On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.

** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Statement of operations Year ended 6/30/09

INVESTMENT INCOME

Dividends (net of foreign tax of $13,020)	$849,108

Interest (including interest income of $17,180 from
investments in affiliated issuers) (Note 6)	30,353

Securities lending	354,775

Total investment income	1,234,236


EXPENSES

Compensation of Manager (Note 2)	1,933,748

Investor servicing fees (Note 2)	789,456

Custodian fees (Note 2)	23,454

Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)	30,920

Administrative services (Note 2)	21,394

Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2)	381,582

Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2)	112,875

Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2)	76,503

Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2)	19,643

Distribution fees — Class R (Note 2)	33,557

Other	200,464

Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Notes 2 and 6)	(638,915)

Total expenses	2,984,681

Expense reduction (Note 2)	(71,263)

Net expenses	2,913,418


Net investment loss	(1,679,182)

Net realized loss on investments (Notes 1 and 3)	(99,773,093)

Net realized gain on futures contracts (Note 1)	203,266

Net realized gain on foreign currency transactions (Note 1)	255

Net realized gain on written options (Notes 1 and 3)	125,260

Net unrealized appreciation of assets and liabilities in
foreign currencies during the year	516

Net unrealized depreciation of investments, futures
contracts and written options during the year	(9,271,137)

Net loss on investments	(108,714,933)

Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations	$(110,394,115)


Statement of changes in net assets


DECREASE IN NET ASSETS
	Year ended	Year ended
	6/30/09	6/30/08

Operations:

Net investment loss	$(1,679,182)	$(3,986,727)

Net realized loss on investments and
foreign currency transactions	(99,444,312)	(32,205,774)

Net unrealized depreciation of investments
and assets and liabilities in foreign currencies (9,270,621)		(57,528,968)

Net decrease in net assets resulting
from operations	(110,394,115)	(93,721,469)

Distributions to shareholders (Note 1):

From ordinary income

Net realized short-term gain on investments

Class A	—	(15,478,164)

Class B	—	(1,625,631)

Class C	—	(854,334)

Class M	—	(235,441)

Class R	—	(532,835)

Class Y	—	(1,372,495)

From return of capital

Class A	—	(423,920)

Class B	—	(44,523)

Class C	—	(23,399)

Class M	—	(6,448)

Class R	—	(14,593)

Class Y	—	(37,590)

From net realized long-term gain on investments

Class A	—	(31,757,121)

Class B	—	(3,335,368)

Class C	—	(1,752,870)

Class M	—	(483,062)

Class R	—	(1,093,236)

Class Y	—	(2,815,998)

Redemption fees (Note 1)	22,698	23,366

Decrease from capital share transactions
(Note 4)	(105,441,244)	(16,610,412)

Total decrease in net assets	(215,812,661)	(172,195,543)


NET ASSETS

Beginning of year	348,540,727	520,736,270

End of year	$132,728,066	$348,540,727

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)


INVESTMENT OPERATIONS:					LESS DISTRIBUTIONS:						RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

													Ratio of net
			Net realized and	Total from	From net					Total return	Net assets,	Ratio of expenses	investment income
	Net asset value,	Net investment	unrealized gain (loss)	investment	realized gain	From return	Total	Redemption	Net asset value,	at net asset	end of period	to average	(loss) to average	Portfolio
Period ended	beginning of period	income (loss) a,b	on investments	operations	on investments	of capital	distributions	fees c	end of period	value (%) d	(in thousands)	net assets (%) ^a,e	net assets (%) a	turnover (%)

Class A
June 30, 2009	$17.17	(.10)	(5.63)	(5.73)	—	—	—	—	$11.44	(33.37)	$106,055	1.47	(.79)	132.67
June 30, 2008	24.46	(.17)	(4.08)	(4.25)	(3.01)	(.03)	(3.04)	—	17.17	(18.98)	270,720	1.52	(.84)	138.44
June 30, 2007	22.58	(.21)	3.45	3.24	(1.36)	—	(1.36)	—	24.46	14.93	393,876	1.54	(.94)	103.19
June 30, 2006	21.65	(.21) f	2.42	2.21	(1.28)	—	(1.28)	—	22.58	10.17	374,810	1.54 f	(.91) f	112.19
June 30, 2005	20.03	(.18) g,h	2.10	1.92	(.30)	—	(.30)	—	21.65	9.61	237,324	1.55	(.90) g,h	92.37

Class B
June 30, 2009	$16.20	(.18)	(5.31)	(5.49)	—	—	—	—	$10.71	(33.89)	$7,724	2.22	(1.55)	132.67
June 30, 2008	23.42	(.32)	(3.86)	(4.18)	(3.01)	(.03)	(3.04)	—	16.20	(19.57)	19,668	2.27	(1.60)	138.44
June 30, 2007	21.83	(.37)	3.32	2.95	(1.36)	—	(1.36)	—	23.42	14.08	53,217	2.29	(1.70)	103.19
June 30, 2006	21.12	(.37) f	2.36	1.99	(1.28)	—	(1.28)	—	21.83	9.36	68,710	2.29 f	(1.67) f	112.19
June 30, 2005	19.69	(.33) g,h	2.06	1.73	(.30)	—	(.30)	—	21.12	8.81	68,758	2.30	(1.68) g,h	92.37

Class C
June 30, 2009	$16.19	(.18)	(5.30)	(5.48)	—	—	—	—	$10.71	(33.85)	$5,859	2.22	(1.55)	132.67
June 30, 2008	23.42	(.31)	(3.88)	(4.19)	(3.01)	(.03)	(3.04)	—	16.19	(19.61)	12,965	2.27	(1.59)	138.44
June 30, 2007	21.82	(.37)	3.33	2.96	(1.36)	—	(1.36)	—	23.42	14.14	21,447	2.29	(1.69)	103.19
June 30, 2006	21.12	(.37) f	2.35	1.98	(1.28)	—	(1.28)	—	21.82	9.31	21,678	2.29 f	(1.66) f	112.19
June 30, 2005	19.69	(.33) g,h	2.06	1.73	(.30)	—	(.30)	—	21.12	8.81	14,148	2.30	(1.66) g,h	92.37

Class M
June 30, 2009	$16.53	(.16)	(5.41)	(5.57)	—	—	—	—	$10.96	(33.70)	$1,086	1.97	(1.30)	132.67
June 30, 2008	23.78	(.26)	(3.95)	(4.21)	(3.01)	(.03)	(3.04)	—	16.53	(19.39)	4,688	2.02	(1.34)	138.44
June 30, 2007	22.09	(.32)	3.37	3.05	(1.36)	—	(1.36)	—	23.78	14.38	5,759	2.04	(1.43)	103.19
June 30, 2006	21.31	(.32) f	2.38	2.06	(1.28)	—	(1.28)	—	22.09	9.61	5,688	2.04 f	(1.42) f	112.19
June 30, 2005	19.82	(.28) g,h	2.07	1.79	(.30)	—	(.30)	—	21.31	9.05	5,108	2.05	(1.42) g,h	92.37

Class R
June 30, 2009	$16.95	(.13)	(5.55)	(5.68)	—	—	—	—	$11.27	(33.51)	$4,910	1.72	(1.05)	132.67
June 30, 2008	24.24	(.21)	(4.04)	(4.25)	(3.01)	(.03)	(3.04)	—	16.95	(19.17)	12,528	1.77	(1.08)	138.44
June 30, 2007	22.44	(.27)	3.43	3.16	(1.36)	—	(1.36)	—	24.24	14.65	11,905	1.79	(1.18)	103.19
June 30, 2006	21.57	(.27) f	2.42	2.15	(1.28)	—	(1.28)	—	22.44	9.92	9,500	1.79 f	(1.17) f	112.19
June 30, 2005	20.01	(.21) g,h	2.07	1.86	(.30)	—	(.30)	—	21.57	9.32	396	1.80	(1.03) g,h	92.37

Class Y
June 30, 2009	$17.42	(.07)	(5.72)	(5.79)	—	—	—	—	$11.63	(33.24)	$7,094	1.22	(.55)	132.67
June 30, 2008	24.71	(.12)	(4.13)	(4.25)	(3.01)	(.03)	(3.04)	—	17.42	(18.77)	27,971	1.27	(.59)	138.44
June 30, 2007	22.73	(.16)	3.50	3.34	(1.36)	—	(1.36)	—	24.71	15.28	34,532	1.29	(.69)	103.19
June 30, 2006	21.73	(.15) f	2.43	2.28	(1.28)	—	(1.28)	—	22.73	10.46	34,466	1.29 f	(.67) f	112.19
June 30, 2005	20.06	(.13) g,h	2.10	1.97	(.30)	—	(.30)	—	21.73	9.85	29,903	1.30	(.65) g,h	92.37

a Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation and/or waivers of certain fund expenses in connection with investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation and/or waivers, the expenses of each class, reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Notes 2 and 6):


	6/30/09

June 30, 2009	0.33%

June 30, 2008	0.20

June 30, 2007	0.14

June 30, 2006	0.12

June 30, 2005	0.15

b Per share net investment income (loss) has been determined on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.

c Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.

d Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.

e Includes amounts paid through expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements (Note 2).

g Reflects a non-recurring accrual related to Putnam Management’s settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding brokerage allocation practices, which amounted to the following amounts:


		Percentage
		of average
	Per share	net assets

Class A	<$0.01	0.01%

Class B	<0.01	0.01

Class C	<0.01	0.01

Class M	<0.01	0.01

Class R	<0.01	0.01

Class Y	<0.01	0.01

h Reflects a dividend received by the fund from a single issuer which amounted to the following amounts:


		Percentage
		of average
	Per share	net assets

Class A	$0.03	0.15%

Class B	0.03	0.13

Class C	0.03	0.14

Class M	0.03	0.13

Class R	0.05	0.26

Class Y	0.03	0.15

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



28	29

Notes to financial statements 6/30/09

Note 1: Significant accounting policies

Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) is a diversified series of Putnam Funds Trust (the “trust”), a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company. The investment objective of the fund is to seek capital appreciation by investing in a portfolio primarily consisting of common stocks of small, rapidly-growing U.S. companies that Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”), the fund’s manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments, LLC, believes have the potential for capital appreciation.

The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M, class R and class Y shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 5.75% and 3.50%, respectively, and generally do not pay a contingent deferred sales charge. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately six years, do not pay a front-end sales charge and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. Class R shares, which are offered to qualified employee-benefit plans, are sold at net asset value. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2. Class Y shares, which are sold at net asset value, are generally subject to the same expenses as class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, but do not bear a distribution fee. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.

In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund’s management team expects the risk of material loss to be remote.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements were issued, August 13, 2009, have been evaluated in the preparation of the financial statements.

A) Security valuation Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last reported sales price on their principal exchange, or official closing price for certain markets. If no sales are reported — as in the case of some securities traded over-the-counter — a security is valued at its last reported bid price. Many securities markets and exchanges outside the U.S. close prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange and therefore the closing prices for securities in such markets or on such exchanges may not fully reflect events that occur after such close but before the close of the New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, on certain days, the fund will fair value foreign equity securities taking into account multiple factors, including movements in the U.S. securities markets. The number of days on which fair value prices will be used will depend on market activity and it is possible that fair value prices will be used by the fund to a significant extent. At June 30, 2009, fair value pricing was used for certain foreign securities in the portfolio. Securities quoted in foreign currencies, if any, are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. To the extent a pricing service or dealer is unable to value a security or provides a valuation Putnam Management does not believe accurately reflects the security’s fair value, the security will be valued at fair value by Putnam Management. Certain investments, including certain restricted and illiquid securities and derivatives, are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security in a current sale and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.

Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income, net of applicable withholding taxes, is recognized on the ex-dividend date except that certain dividends from foreign securities, if any, are recognized as soon as the fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividends, if any, are recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Dividends representing a return of capital or capital gains, if any, are reflected as a reduction of cost and/or as a realized gain.

E) Foreign currency translation The accounting records of the fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. The market value of foreign securities, currency holdings, and other assets and liabilities is recorded in the books and records of the fund after translation to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rates on that day. The cost of each security is determined using historical exchange rates. Income and withholding taxes are translated at prevailing exchange rates when earned or incurred. The fund does not isolate that portion of realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in the foreign exchange rate on investments from fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of the securities. Such gains and losses are included with the

net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net realized exchange gains or losses on closed forward currency contracts, disposition of foreign currencies, currency gains and losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and the difference between the amount of investment income and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies arise from changes in the value of open forward currency contracts and assets and liabilities other than investments at the period end, resulting from changes in the exchange rate. Investments in foreign securities involve certain risks, including those related to economic instability, unfavorable political developments, and currency fluctuations, not present with domestic investments.

Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio. Outstanding contracts at period end are indicative of the volume of activity during the period.

G) Securities lending The fund may lend securities, through its agents, to qualified borrowers in order to earn additional income. The loans are collateralized by cash and/or securities in an amount at least equal to the market value of the securities loaned. The market value of securities loaned is determined daily and any additional required collateral is allocated to the fund on the next business day. The risk of borrower default will be borne by the fund’s agents; the fund will bear the risk of loss with respect to the investment of the cash collateral. Income from securities lending is included in investment income on the Statement of operations. At June 30, 2009, the value of securities loaned amounted to $10,538,929. The fund received cash collateral of $10,880,177 which is pooled with collateral of other Putnam funds into 23 issues of short-term investments.

H) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its taxable income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code. The fund is subject to the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 sets forth a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The fund did not have any unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial statements. No provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains. Each of the fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.

At June 30, 2009, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $75,702,563 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. This capital loss carryover will expire on June 30, 2017.

Pursuant to federal income tax regulations applicable to regulated investment companies, the fund has elected to defer to its fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 $71,123,841 of losses recognized during the period November 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009.

I) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. These differences include temporary and/or permanent differences of losses on wash sale transactions, post-October loss deferrals and net operating loss. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the fund reclassified $1,679,182 to decrease accumulated net investment loss and $1,683,537 to decrease paid-in-capital, with a decrease to accumulated net realized losses of $4,355.

The tax basis components of distributable earnings and the federal tax cost as of June 30, 2009 were as follows:


Unrealized appreciation	$ 21,699,588
Unrealized depreciation	(14,213,362)

Net unrealized appreciation	7,486,226
Capital loss carryforward	(75,702,563)
Post-October loss	(71,123,841)

Cost for federal income tax purposes	$138,633,610

J) Expenses of the trust Expenses directly charged or attributable to any fund will be paid from the assets of that fund. Generally, expenses of the trust will be allocated among and charged to the assets of each fund on a basis that the Trustees deem fair and equitable, which may be based on the relative assets of each fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each fund.

Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and other transactions

The fund pays Putnam Management for management and investment advisory services quarterly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the following annual rates: 1.00% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.90% of the next $500 million, 0.85% of the next $500 million, 0.80% of the next $5 billion, 0.775% of the next $5 billion, 0.755% of the next $5 billion, 0.74% of the next $5 billion, and 0.73% thereafter. Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through July 31, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment

classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses.

Putnam Management has further agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund for the period from January 1, 2007 through July 31, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of a custom group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc. based on the size of the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s total expenses with the average operating expenses of the funds in this Lipper custom peer group for their respective 2006 and 2007 fiscal years, excluding 12b-1 fees and after adjustment for certain expense offset and brokerage/service arrangements that reduced expenses of the fund.

For the year ended June 30, 2009, the fund’s expenses were limited to the lower of the limits specified above and accordingly, Putnam Management waived $638,330 of its management fee from the fund.

Putnam Management has contractually agreed from August 1, 2009 through July 31, 2010, to limit the management fee for the fund to 0.642% based on the fund’s average net assets.

Putnam Management has also contractually agreed from August 1, 2009 through July 31, 2010, to limit the fund’s expenses (not including brokerage, interest, taxes, investment-related expenses, extraordinary expenses and payments under the fund’s investor servicing contract, investment management contract and distribution plan) to an annual rate of 0.20% of the fund’s average net assets.

Putnam Investor Services, Inc., an affiliate of Putnam Management, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Prior to December 31, 2008, these services were provided by Putnam Investor Services, a division of Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), which is an affiliate of Putnam Management. Putnam Investor Services, Inc. and Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing, subject to certain limitations, based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. The amounts incurred for investor servicing agent functions provided by affiliates of Putnam Management during the year ended June 30, 2009 are included in Investor servicing fees in the Statement of operations.

The fund has entered into expense offset arrangements with PFTC and State Street whereby PFTC’s and State Street’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. The fund also reduced expenses through brokerage/ service arrangements. For the year ended June 30, 2009, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $2,282 under the expense offset arrangements and by $68,981 under the brokerage/service arrangements.

Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $323, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings and industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees.

The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00% ,1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at an annual rate of 0.25%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 0.75% and 0.50% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively.

For the year ended June 30, 2009, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $21,769 and $250 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $24,395 and $374 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.

A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% and 0.65% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A and class M shares, respectively. For the year ended June 30, 2009, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received $274 and no monies on class A and class M redemptions, respectively.

Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities

During the year ended June 30, 2009, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $267,323,517 and $370,538,518, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.

Written option transactions during the year ended June 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:


	Contract	Premiums
	Amounts	Received

Written options
outstanding at beginning of year	$46,236	$68,676

Options opened	168,304	137,459

Options exercised	—	—

Options expired	(162,544)	(125,260)

Options closed	—	—

Written options outstanding at end of year	$51,996	$80,875

Note 4: Capital shares

At June 30, 2009, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:


	Year ended 6/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class A	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	2,481,616	$30,547,202	4,489,190	$92,040,877

Shares issued in	—	—	2,214,494	43,647,675
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	2,481,616	30,547,202	6,703,684	135,688,552

Shares	(8,978,166)	(105,444,703)	(7,038,317)	(137,953,193)
repurchased

Net decrease	(6,496,550)	$(74,897,501)	(334,633)	$(2,264,641)


	Year ended 6/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class B	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	161,464	$1,918,294	226,561	$4,471,032

Shares issued in	—	—	219,607	4,100,053
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	161,464	1,918,294	446,168	8,571,085

Shares	(654,731)	(7,726,120)	(1,504,102)	(30,793,214)
repurchased

Net decrease	(493,267)	$(5,807,826)	(1,057,934)	$(22,222,129)


	Year ended 6/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class C	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	105,103	$1,553,015	158,164	$3,075,933

Shares issued in	—	—	110,237	2,057,028
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	105,103	1,553,015	268,401	5,132,961

Shares	(358,683)	(4,496,325)	(383,388)	(7,067,421)
repurchased

Net decrease	(253,580)	$(2,943,310)	(114,987)	$(1,934,460)


	Year ended 6/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class M	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	108,847	$1,287,510	123,179	$2,235,099

Shares issued in	—	—	37,728	717,957
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	108,847	1,287,510	160,907	2,953,056

Shares	(293,342)	(2,980,077)	(119,526)	(2,199,681)
repurchased

Net increase	(184,495)	$(1,692,567)	41,381	$753,375
(decrease)


	Year ended 6/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class R	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	176,202	$2,094,244	335,481	$6,688,164

Shares issued in	—	—	79,226	1,543,325
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	176,202	2,094,244	414,707	8,231,489

Shares	(479,565)	(6,623,849)	(166,610)	(3,360,267)
repurchased

Net increase	(303,363)	$(4,529,605)	248,097	$4,871,222
(decrease)


	Year ended 6/30/09		Year ended 6/30/08

Class Y	Shares	Amount	Shares	Amount

Shares sold	341,152	$4,351,824	509,576	$10,238,372

Shares issued in	—	—	210,535	4,202,282
connection with
reinvestment of
distributions

	341,152	4,351,824	720,111	14,440,654

Shares	(1,337,320)	(19,922,259)	(511,802)	(10,254,433)
repurchased

Net increase	(996,168)	$(15,570,435)	208,309	$4,186,221
(decrease)

Note 5: Summary of derivative activity

The following is a summary of the market values of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2009:

Market values of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2009:


	Asset derivatives		Liability derivatives

Derivatives not
accounted for
as hedging
instruments under	Balance sheet	Market	Balance sheet	Market
Statement 133	location	value	location	value

Equity contracts	Investments	$121,055	Payables	$5,564


Total		$121,055		$5,564

The following is a summary of realized and unrealized gains or losses of derivative instruments on the Statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009. (see Note 1):

Amount of Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income


Derivatives not
accounted for
as hedging
instruments under
Statement 133	Options	Futures	Total

Equity contracts	$(49,817)	$203,266	$153,449


Total	$(49,817)	$203,266	$153,449

Change in Unrealized Appreciation or (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income


Derivatives not
accounted for
as hedging
instruments under
Statement 133	Options	Futures	Total

Equity contracts	$186,648	$30,498	$217,146


Total	$186,648	$30,498	$217,146

Note 6: Investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund and Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund

The fund invested in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund were valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Management fees paid by the fund were reduced by an amount equal to the management fees paid by Putnam Prime Money Market Fund with respect to assets invested by the fund in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. For the year ended June 30, 2009, management fees paid were reduced by $585 relating to the fund’s investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. Income distributions earned by the fund were recorded as interest income in the Statement of operations and totaled $16,975 for the year ended June 30, 2009. During the year ended June 30, 2009, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund aggregated $35,126,710 and $37,547,066, respectively.

In April 2009, the fund invested in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund are valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Income distributions earned by the fund are recorded as interest income in the Statement of operations and totaled $205 for the year ended June 30, 2009. During the year ended June 30, 2009, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund aggregated $5,353,939 and $5,353,939, respectively. Management fees charged to Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund have been waived by Putnam Management.

Note 7: Regulatory matters and litigation

In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the SEC and the Massachusetts Securities Division in connection with excessive short-term trading in Putnam funds. Distribution of payments from Putnam Management to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders is expected to be completed in the next several months. These allegations and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.

Note 8: Market and credit risk

Note 9: Other

In addition, the proposed management contract would provide for the management fee to be adjusted higher or lower based on the fund’s performance relative to its benchmark.

Federal tax information (unaudited)

The Form 1099 you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2009.

About the Trustees

Ravi Akhoury

Born 1947, Trustee since 2009

Mr. Akhoury graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology and holds an M.S. from State University of New York at Stonybrook.

Jameson A. Baxter

Born 1943, Trustee since 1994,
Vice Chairman since 2005

Charles B. Curtis

Born 1940, Trustee since 2001

Robert J. Darretta

Born 1946, Trustee since 2007

Mr. Darretta serves as Director of United Health Group, a diversified health-care company.

Mr. Darretta received a B.S. in Economics from Villanova University.

Myra R. Drucker

Born 1948, Trustee since 2004

Prior to December 1992, Ms. Drucker was Staff Vice President and Director of Trust Investments for International Paper (a paper and packaging company).

Ms. Drucker received a B.A. in Literature and Psychology from Sarah Lawrence College and pursued graduate studies in economics, statistics, and portfolio theory at Temple University.

John A. Hill

Born 1942, Trustee since 1985 and
Chairman since 2000

Born and raised in Midland, Texas, Mr. Hill received his B.A. in Economics from Southern Methodist University and pursued graduate studies as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow.

Paul L. Joskow

Born 1947, Trustee since 1997

Elizabeth T. Kennan

Born 1938, Trustee since 1992

Dr. Kennan is a Partner of Cambus-Kenneth Farm (thoroughbred horse and cattle breeding). She is President Emeritus of Mount Holyoke College.

Kenneth R. Leibler

Born 1949, Trustee since 2006

Mr. Leibler is a founder and former Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange, an electronic marketplace for the trading of derivative securities.

Mr. Leibler graduated magna cum laude with a degree in Economics from Syra-cuse University, where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa.

Robert E. Patterson

Born 1945, Trustee since 1984

Mr. Patterson is Senior Partner of Cabot Properties, LP and Chairman of Cabot Properties, Inc. (a private equity firm investing in commercial real estate).

Mr. Patterson practiced law and held various positions in state government, and was the founding Executive Director of the Massa-chusetts Industrial Finance Agency. Mr. Patterson is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School.

George Putnam, III

Born 1951, Trustee since 1984

Robert L. Reynolds*

Born 1952, Trustee since 2008 and
President of the Funds since 2009

Mr. Reynolds received a B.S. in Business Administration/Finance from West Virginia University.

W. Thomas Stephens

Born 1942, Trustee since 2009

He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Arkansas.

Richard B. Worley

Born 1945, Trustee since 2004

Mr. Worley is Managing Partner of Permit Capital LLC, an investment management firm.

Mr. Worley serves as a Trustee of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (a philanthropic organization devoted

Mr. Worley holds a B.S. from the University of Tennessee and pursued graduate studies in economics at the University of Texas.

The address of each Trustee is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

As of June 30, 2009, there were over 100 Putnam funds. All Trustees serve as Trustees of all Putnam funds.

Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until his or her resignation, retirement at age 72, death, or removal.

Officers

In addition to Robert L. Reynolds, the other officers of the fund are shown below:


Charles E. Porter (Born 1938)	James P. Pappas (Born 1953)	Wanda M. McManus (Born 1947)
Executive Vice President, Principal	Vice President	Vice President, Senior Associate
Executive Officer, Associate Treasurer,	Since 2004	Treasurer and Assistant Clerk
and Compliance Liaison	Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Since 2005
Since 1989	and Putnam Management. During 2002,	Senior Associate Treasurer/Assistant Clerk
	Chief Operating Officer, Atalanta/Sosnoff	of Funds
Jonathan S. Horwitz (Born 1955)	Management Corporation
Senior Vice President and Treasurer		Nancy E. Florek (Born 1957)
Since 2004	Francis J. McNamara, III (Born 1955)	Vice President, Assistant Clerk,
Prior to 2004, Managing Director,	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer	Assistant Treasurer and Proxy Manager
Putnam Investments	Since 2004	Since 2005
	Senior Managing Director, Putnam	Manager, Mutual Fund Proxy Voting
Steven D. Krichmar (Born 1958)	Investments, Putnam Management and
Vice President and	Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2004,
Principal Financial Officer	General Counsel, State Street Research &
Since 2002	Management Company
Senior Managing Director,
Putnam Investments	Robert R. Leveille (Born 1969)
	Vice President and
Janet C. Smith (Born 1965)	Chief Compliance Officer
Vice President, Principal Accounting	Since 2007
Officer and Assistant Treasurer	Managing Director, Putnam Investments,
Since 2007	Putnam Management, and Putnam Retail
Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Management. Prior to 2004, member of
and Putnam Management	Bell Boyd & Lloyd LLC. Prior to 2003,
	Vice President and Senior Counsel,
Susan G. Malloy (Born 1957)	Liberty Funds Group LLC
Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
Since 2007	Mark C. Trenchard (Born 1962)
Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Vice President and
	BSA Compliance Officer
Beth S. Mazor (Born 1958)	Since 2002
Vice President	Managing Director, Putnam Investments
Since 2002
Managing Director, Putnam Investments	Judith Cohen (Born 1945)
	Vice President,
	Clerk and Assistant Treasurer
	Since 1993

The address of each Officer is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

Fund information


Investment Manager	Officers	Judith Cohen
Putnam Investment	Robert L. Reynolds	Vice President, Clerk and
Management, LLC	President	Assistant Treasurer
One Post Office Square
Boston, MA 02109	Charles E. Porter	Wanda M. McManus
	Executive Vice President, Principal	Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer
Marketing Services	Executive Officer, Associate Treasurer	and Assistant Clerk
Putnam Retail Management	and Compliance Liaison
One Post Office Square		Nancy E. Florek
Boston, MA 02109	Jonathan S. Horwitz	Vice President, Assistant Clerk,
	Senior Vice President and Treasurer	Assistant Treasurer and Proxy Manage
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company	Steven D. Krichmar
	Vice President and
Legal Counsel	Principal Financial Officer
Ropes & Gray LLP
	Janet C. Smith
Independent Registered Public	Vice President, Principal Accounting
Accounting Firm	Officer and Assistant Treasurer
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
	Susan G. Malloy
Trustees	Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
John A. Hill, Chairman
Jameson A. Baxter, Vice Chairman	Beth S. Mazor
Ravi Akhoury	Vice President
Charles B. Curtis
Robert J. Darretta	James P. Pappas
Myra R. Drucker	Vice President
Paul L. Joskow
Elizabeth T. Kennan	Francis J. McNamara, III
Kenneth R. Leibler	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Robert E. Patterson
George Putnam, III	Robert R. Leveille
Robert L. Reynolds	Vice President and
Richard B. Worley	Chief Compliance Officer

	Mark C. Trenchard
	Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer

This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.

Item 2. Code of Ethics:

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:

The following table presents fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to the fund by the fund’s independent auditor:


Fiscal		Audit-
year	Audit	Related	Tax	All Other
ended	Fees	Fees	Fees	Fees

June 30, 2009	$68,676	$--	$4,558	$366*
June 30, 2008	$69,620	$--	$4,260	$144*

* Includes fees of $366 and $144 billed by the fund’s independent auditor to the fund for procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. These fees were reimbursed to the fund by Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”).

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, the fund’s independent auditor billed aggregate non-audit fees in the amounts of $471,749 and $51,466 respectively, to the fund, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.

All Other Fees represent procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters.

The following table presents fees billed by the fund’s independent auditor for services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


Fiscal	Audit-		All	Total
year	Related	Tax	Other	Non-Audit
ended	Fees	Fees	Fees	Fees

June 30, 2009	$ -	$ 400,341	$ -	$ -
June 30, 2008	$ -	$ 15,000	$ -	$ -

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not applicable

Item 6. Schedule of Investments:

The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:

Not applicable

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies

Not Applicable

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:

Not applicable

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:

Not applicable

Item 11. Controls and Procedures:

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable

Item 12. Exhibits:

(a)(1) The Code of Ethics of The Putnam Funds, which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments, is filed herewith.

(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Putnam Funds Trust

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith

Principal Accounting Officer

Date: August 28, 2009

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer

Date: August 28, 2009

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 28, 2009