XML 29 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Allowance for Credit Losses
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Receivables [Abstract]  
Allowance for Credit Losses Allowance for Credit Losses
 
Management reviews the appropriateness of the ACL on a regular basis. Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance to be a critical accounting policy, given the inherent uncertainty in evaluating the levels of the allowance required to cover credit losses in the portfolio and the material effect that assumptions could have on the Company’s results of operations. The Company has developed a methodology to measure the amount of estimated credit loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio to assure that an appropriate allowance is maintained. The Company’s methodology is based upon guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("CECL"), and Financial Instruments - Credit Losses and ASC Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses.

The Company uses a DCF method to estimate expected credit losses for all loan segments excluding the leasing segment. For each of these loan segments, the Company generates cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speed, curtailments, recovery lag, probability of default, and loss given default. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds, curtailment rates, and time to recovery are based on internal historical data.

The Company uses regression analysis of historical internal and peer data to determine suitable loss drivers to utilize when modeling lifetime probability of default and loss given default. This analysis also determines how expected probability of default and loss given default will react to forecasted levels of the loss drivers. For all loans utilizing the DCF method, management utilizes forecasts of national unemployment and a one year percentage change in national gross domestic product as loss drivers in the model.
For all DCF models, management has determined that four quarters represents a reasonable and supportable forecast period and reverts back to a historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. Management leverages economic projections from a reputable and independent third party to inform its loss driver forecasts over the four-quarter forecast period. Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts, and scenario weightings, are also considered by management when developing the forecast metrics.

Due to the size and characteristics of the leasing portfolio, the Company uses the remaining life method, using the historical loss rate of the commercial and industrial segment, to determine the allowance for credit losses.

The combination of adjustments for credit expectations and timing expectations produces an expected cash flow stream at the instrument level. Instrument effective yield is calculated, net of the impacts of prepayment assumptions, and the instrument expected cash flows are then discounted at that effective yield to produce a net present value of expected cash flows ("NPV"). An ACL is established for the difference between the NPV and amortized cost basis.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2020 using the prospective transition approach for financial assets purchased with credit deterioration ("PCD") that were previously classified as purchased credit impaired ("PCI") and accounted for under ASC 310-30. In accordance with the standard, the Company did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of adoption. The remaining discount on the PCD assets will be accreted into interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans.

Since the methodology is based upon historical experience and trends, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, as well as management’s judgment, factors may arise that result in different estimates. While management’s evaluation of the allowance as of December 31, 2020, considers the allowance to be appropriate, under adversely different conditions or assumptions, the Company would need to increase or decrease the allowance. In addition, various federal and State regulatory agencies, as part of their examination process, review the Company's allowance and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgements and information available to them at the time of their examinations.

Loan Commitments and Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures

Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans, and commercial letters of credit. The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for off-balance sheet loan commitments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. The Company records an allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures, unless the commitments to extend credit are unconditionally cancelable, through a charge to credit loss expense for off-balance sheet credit exposures included in other noninterest expense in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.

Changes in the allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are summarized as follows:
(In thousands)202020192018
Total allowance at beginning of year$39,892 $43,410 $39,771 
Impact of adopting ASU 2016-13(2,534)
Provisions for credit loss expense16,151 1,366 3,942 
Recoveries on loans and leases631 906 2,137 
Charge-offs on loans and leases(2,471)(5,790)(2,440)
Total allowance at end of year$51,669 $39,892 $43,410 
 
The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses on loans for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. As previously discussed, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective approach. Results for the periods beginning after January 1, 2020 are presented under ASC 326, while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable U.S. GAAP. As a result of the adoption of ASC 326, the Company recorded a net cumulative-effect adjustment reducing the allowance for credit losses by $2.5 million. The allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.
 
December 31, 2020
(In thousands)Commercial
& Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Real Estate
Consumer
and Other
Finance
Leases
Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance, prior to adoption of ASU 2016-13$10,541 $21,608 $6,381 $1,362 $$39,892 
Impact of adopting ASU 2016-13(2,008)(5,917)4,459 850 82 (2,534)
Charge-offs(2)(1,903)(84)(482)(2,471)
Recoveries131 58 194 248 631 
Provision (credit) for credit loss expense577 16,700 (693)(416)(17)16,151 
Ending Balance$9,239 $30,546 $10,257 $1,562 $65 $51,669 
 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Commercial
& Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Real Estate
Consumer
and Other
Finance
Leases
Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance$11,272 $23,483 $7,345 $1,310 $$43,410 
Charge-offs(696)(4,015)(256)(823)(5,790)
Recoveries103 174 334 295 906 
Provision (credit) for credit loss expense(138)1,966 (1,042)580 1,366 
Ending Balance$10,541 $21,608 $6,381 $1,362 $0 $39,892 

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans, which are individually evaluated to determine expected credit losses, and the related allowance for credit losses allocated to these loans:

(In thousands)Real EstateBusiness AssetsOtherTotalACL Allocation
December 31, 2020
Commercial and Industrial$103 $582 $110 $795 $122 
Commercial Real Estate24,277 1,418 25,695 186 
Residential Real Estate
Total$24,380 $2,000 $110 $26,490 $308 
  
At December 31, 2019, the allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses summarized on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology was as follows:
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Commercial
& Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Real Estate
Consumer
and Other
Finance LeasesTotal
Allowance for originated loans and leases
Individually evaluated for impairment$245 $662 $$$$907 
Collectively evaluated for impairment10,296 20,895 6,360 1,356 38,907 
Ending balance$10,541 $21,557 $6,360 $1,356 $0 $39,814 
Allowance for acquired loans
Individually evaluated for impairment$$$$$$
Collectively evaluated for impairment51 21 78 
Ending balance$0 $51 $21 $6 $0 $78 
  
The recorded investment in loans and leases summarized on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology as of December 31, 2019 was as follows:
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Commercial
& Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Real Estate
Consumer 
and Other
Finance LeasesTotal
Originated loans and leases
Individually evaluated for impairment$2,110 $13,496 $3,779 $$$19,385 
Collectively evaluated for impairment966,875 2,283,152 1,340,687 73,625 17,322 4,681,661 
Total$968,985 $2,296,648 $1,344,466 $73,625 $17,322 $4,701,046 

December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Commercial
& Industrial
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
Real Estate
Consumer 
and Other
Finance
Leases
Total
Acquired loans
Individually evaluated for impairment$$714 $2,114 $$$2,830 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality173 5,674 3,302 9,149 
Collectively evaluated for impairment38,901 140,529 27,955 785 208,170 
Total$39,076 $146,917 $33,371 $785 $0 $220,149 
 
Prior to the adoption of ASC 326, a loan was considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it was probable that we would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans consisted of non-homogenous nonaccrual loans, and all loans restructured in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). Specific reserves on individually identified impaired loans that were not collateral dependent were measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate of each loan. For loans that were collateral dependent, impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, and such impaired amounts were generally charged off. The majority of impaired loans were collateral dependent impaired loans that had limited exposure or require limited specific reserves because of the amount of collateral support with respect to these loans, and
previous charge-offs. Interest payments on impaired loans were typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount was reasonably assured. In these cases, interest was recognized on a cash basis. There was no interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases for 2019 and 2018. 

Impaired loans at December 31, 2019 were as follows: 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Recorded InvestmentUnpaid Principal BalanceRelated Allowance
Originated loans and leases with no related allowance
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other$1,865 $1,965 $
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other10,205 11,017 
Residential real estate
Home equity3,779 3,992 
Subtotal$15,849 $16,974 $
Originated loans and leases with related allowance
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other245 245 245 
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other3,291 3,291 662 
Subtotal$3,536 $3,536 $907 
Total$19,385 $20,510 $907 
 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Recorded InvestmentUnpaid Principal BalanceRelated Allowance
Acquired loans with no related allowance
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other$$$
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other714 714 
Residential real estate
Home equity2,114 2,217 
Total$2,830 $2,933 $0 
The average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired originated loans for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
20192018
(In thousands)Average Recorded InvestmentInterest Income RecognizedAverage Recorded InvestmentInterest Income Recognized
Originated loans and leases with no related allowance
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other$1,830 $0 $1,979 $
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other7,552 0 5,165 
Residential real estate
Home equity3,943 0 3,983 
Subtotal$13,325 $0 $11,127 $
Originated loans and leases with related allowance
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other$132 $0 $1,374 $
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other1,391 0 1,357 
Subtotal$1,523 $0 $2,731 $
Total$14,848 $0 $13,858 $
 
The average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired acquired loans for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 
20192018
(In thousands)Average Recorded InvestmentInterest Income RecognizedAverage Recorded InvestmentInterest Income Recognized
Acquired loans and leases with no related allowance
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other$21 $$50 $
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other822 999 
Residential real estate
Home equity2,503 2,945 
Subtotal$3,346 $$3,994 $
Acquired loans and leases with related allowance
Subtotal$$$$
Total$3,346 $$3,994 $
 
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $18.2 million at December 31, 2019, and $17.9 million at December 31, 2018.
 
Loans are considered modified in a TDR when, due to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company makes a concession(s) to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. When modifications are provided for reasons other than as a result of the financial distress of the borrower, these loans are not classified as TDRs or impaired. These modifications primarily include, among others, an extension of the term of the loan, and granting a period when interest-only payments can be made, with the principal payments and interest caught up over the remaining term of the loan or at maturity, among others.
 
The following tables present loans by class modified in 2020 and 2019 as troubled debt restructurings. Post-modification balances reflect paydowns and charge-offs at time of modification.
 
Troubled Debt Restructuring
December 31, 2020Year Ended
Defaulted TDRs2
(In thousands)Number of
Loans
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded InvestmentNumber of
Loans
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other1
$24 $24 $
Residential real estate
Mortgages274 274 37 
Home equity1
43 43 87 
Consumer and other
Consumer and other
Total5 $345 $345 2 $124 
1Represents the following concessions: extension of term and reduction of rate.
2TDRs that defaulted during the 12 months ended December 31, 2020, that had been restructured in the prior twelve months.
December 31, 2019Year Ended
Defaulted TDRs2
(In thousands)Number of
Loans
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded InvestmentNumber of
Loans
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial & industrial
Commercial and industrial other$604 $604 $
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate other1
1,577 1,577 
Residential real estate
Home equity1
181 181 93 
Total5 $2,362 $2,362 1 $93 
1Represents the following concessions: extension of term and reduction of rate.
2TDRs that defaulted during the 12 months ended December 31, 2019, that had been restructured in the prior twelve months.

The Company's TDRs totaled $345,000 at December 31, 2020, compared to $2.4 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2020, the Company was not committed to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that were classified as TDRs. The provisions of the CARES Act guidance issued by Federal banking regulators provided guidance and clarification related to modifications and deferral programs to assist borrowers who are negatively impacted by the COVID-19 national emergency. The guidance and clarifications detail certain provisions whereby banks are permitted to make deferrals and modifications to the terms of a loan which would not require the loan to be reported as a TDR. In accordance with the CARES Act and the interagency guidance, the Company elected to adopt the provisions to not report qualified loan modifications as TDRs.
The following table presents credit quality indicators by total loans on an amortized cost basis by origination year as of December 31, 2020.
(In thousands)20202019201820172016PriorRevolving Loans Amortized Cost BasisRevolving Loans Converted to TermTotal Loans
Commercial & Industrial - Other:
Pass$91,597 $72,639 $56,191 $60,714 $33,402 $301,027 $149,969 $16,301 $781,840 
Special Mention1,064 367 344 912 2,045 228 1,331 6,291 
Substandard412 305 933 485 292 783 1,646 4,856 
Total Commercial & Industrial - Other$93,073 $73,311 $57,468 $62,111 $35,739 $302,038 $152,946 $16,301 $792,987 
Commercial and Industrial - PPP:
Pass$291,252 $$$$$$$$291,252 
Special Mention
Substandard
Total Commercial and Industrial - PPP$291,252 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $291,252 
Commercial and Industrial - Agriculture:
Pass$11,536 $8,005 $11,162 $6,531 $3,539 $2,599 $41,936 $1,340 $86,648 
Special Mention28 729 2,080 2,837 
Substandard99 83 202 2,308 2,312 5,004 
Total Commercial and Industrial - Agriculture$11,635 $8,088 $11,190 $7,462 $3,539 $4,907 $46,328 $1,340 $94,489 
Commercial Real Estate
Pass$278,747 $246,331 $232,651 $237,487 $290,106 $664,027 $33,117 $64,903 $2,047,369 
Special Mention35 13,016 5,612 4,654 34,310 46,074 203 103,904 
Substandard4,933 18,395 6,172 5,625 17,610 302 53,037 
Total Commercial Real Estate$278,782 $264,280 $256,658 $248,313 $330,041 $727,711 $33,622 $64,903 $2,204,310 
Commercial Real Estate - Agriculture:
Pass$22,440 $35,081 $44,519 $22,356 $17,081 $44,559 $919 $5,602 $192,557 
Special Mention1,960 575 1,366 1,053 49 5,009 
Substandard1,777 713 1,527 283 4,300 
Total Commercial Real Estate - Agriculture$24,400 $35,081 $45,094 $25,499 $18,847 $46,092 $1,251 $5,602 $201,866 
Commercial Real Estate - Construction
Pass$14,465 $20,705 $7,999 $2,478 $1,879 $6,682 $85,513 $21,051 $160,772 
Special Mention467 1,453 1,920 
Substandard324 324 
Total Commercial Real Estate - Construction$14,465 $20,705 $7,999 $2,478 $1,879 $7,473 $86,966 $21,051 $163,016 
The following table presents credit quality indicators by total loans on an amortized cost basis by origination year as of December 31, 2020, continued.

(In thousands)20202019201820172016PriorRevolving Loans Amortized Cost BasisRevolving Loans Converted to TermTotal Loans
Residential - Home Equity
Performing$1,440 $2,764 $1,052 $2,120 $722 $1,106 $188,614 $44 $197,862 
Nonperforming18 194 506 2,247 2,965 
Total Residential - Home Equity$1,440 $2,782 $1,052 $2,120 $916 $1,612 $190,861 $44 $200,827 
Residential - Mortgages
Performing$305,476 $193,543 $123,205 $155,699 $178,149 $255,556 $11,735 $1,617 $1,224,980 
Nonperforming258 455 706 1,404 7,305 52 10,180 
Total Residential - Mortgages$305,476 $193,801 $123,660 $156,405 $179,553 $262,861 $11,787 $1,617 $1,235,160 
Consumer - Direct
Performing$14,840 $11,127 $8,011 $6,632 $2,854 $10,840 $6,835 $$61,139 
Nonperforming74 167 12 $260 
Total Consumer - Direct$14,845 $11,201 $8,178 $6,644 $2,854 $10,842 $6,835 $0 $61,399 
Consumer - Indirect
Performing$1,424 $1,878 $3,327 $1,128 $382 $93 $$$8,232 
Nonperforming67 44 36 15 169 
Total Consumer Indirect$1,424 $1,945 $3,371 $1,135 $418 $108 $0 $0 $8,401 

The following tables present credit quality indicators (internal risk grade) by class of commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans as of December 31, 2019. 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Commercial & Industrial OtherCommercial & Industrial AgricultureCommercial Real Estate OtherCommercial Real Estate AgricultureCommercial Real Estate ConstructionTotal
Originated Loans and Leases
Internal risk grade:
Pass$851,517 $89,892 $1,857,142 $166,888 $212,302 $3,177,741 
Special Mention8,306 1,698 16,623 3,173 29,800 
Substandard3,376 14,196 25,880 14,640 58,092 
Total$863,199 $105,786 $1,899,645 $184,701 $212,302 $3,265,633 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Commercial & Industrial OtherCommercial & Industrial AgricultureCommercial Real Estate OtherCommercial Real Estate AgricultureCommercial Real Estate ConstructionTotal
Acquired Loans and Leases
Internal risk grade:
Pass$38,879 $$143,175 $197 $1,335 $183,586 
Special Mention
Substandard197 2,210 2,407 
Total$39,076 $0 $145,385 $197 $1,335 $185,993 
 
The following tables present credit quality indicators by class of residential real estate loans and by class of consumer loans. Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual, impaired, and loans 90 days past due and accruing interest. All other loans were considered performing as of December 31, 2019. For purposes of this footnote, acquired loans that were recorded at fair value at the acquisition date and are 90 days or greater past due are considered performing.
 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Residential
Home Equity
Residential
Mortgages
Consumer
Indirect
Consumer
Other
Total
Originated Loans and Leases
Performing$201,970 $1,133,237 $12,847 $60,503 $1,408,557 
Nonperforming1,924 7,335 117 158 9,534 
Total$203,894 $1,140,572 $12,964 $60,661 $1,418,091 
 
December 31, 2019
(In thousands)Residential
Home Equity
Residential
Mortgages
Consumer
Indirect
Consumer
Other
Total
Acquired Loans and Leases
Performing$14,479 $17,269 $$785 $32,533 
Nonperforming872 751 1,623 
Total$15,351 $18,020 $0 $785 $34,156