XML 30 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Note 9 — Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

From the late 1800s through the mid-1900s, UGI Utilities and its current and former subsidiaries owned and operated a number of MGPs prior to the general availability of natural gas. Some constituents of coal tars and other residues of the manufactured gas process are today considered hazardous substances under the Superfund Law and may be present on the sites of former MGPs. Between 1882 and 1953, UGI Utilities owned the stock of subsidiary gas companies in Pennsylvania and elsewhere and also operated the businesses of some gas companies under agreement. By the early 1950s, UGI Utilities divested all of its utility operations other than certain Pennsylvania operations, including those which now constitute UGI South and Electric Utility. Beginning in 2006 and 2008, UGI Utilities also owned and operated two acquired subsidiaries (CPG and PNG), which now constitute UGI North and UGI Central, with similar histories of owning, and in some cases operating, MGPs in Pennsylvania. CPG and PNG merged into UGI Utilities effective October 1, 2018.
Prior to the Utility Merger, each of UGI Utilities and its subsidiaries, CPG and PNG, were subject to COAs with the PADEP to address the remediation of specified former MGP sites in Pennsylvania. In accordance with the COAs, as amended to recognize the Utility Merger, UGI Utilities, as the successor to CPG and PNG, is required to either obtain a certain number of points per calendar year based on defined eligible environmental investigatory and/or remedial activities at the MGPs and in the case of one COA, an additional obligation to plug specific natural gas wells, or make expenditures for such activities in an amount equal to an annual environmental cost cap (i.e. minimum expenditure threshold). The cost cap of the three COAs, in the aggregate, is $5,350. The three COAs are currently scheduled to terminate at the end of 2031, 2020 and 2020. At March 31, 2019, September 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018, our aggregate estimated accrued liabilities for environmental investigation and remediation costs related to the COAs totaled $50,844, $50,970, and $51,941, respectively. UGI Utilities has recorded associated regulatory assets for these costs because recovery of these costs from customers is probable (see Note 7).

UGI Utilities does not expect the costs for investigation and remediation of hazardous substances at Pennsylvania MGP sites to be material to its results of operations because UGI Utilities receives ratemaking recovery of actual environmental investigation and remediation costs associated with the sites covered by the COAs. This ratemaking recognition reconciles the accumulated difference between historical costs and rate recoveries with an estimate of future costs associated with the sites.

From time to time, UGI Utilities is notified of sites outside Pennsylvania on which private parties allege MGPs were formerly owned or operated by UGI Utilities or owned or operated by a former subsidiary. Such parties generally investigate the extent of environmental contamination or perform environmental remediation. Management believes that, under applicable law, UGI Utilities should not be liable in those instances in which a former subsidiary owned or operated an MGP. There could be, however, significant future costs of an uncertain amount associated with environmental damage caused by MGPs outside Pennsylvania that UGI Utilities directly operated, or that were owned or operated by a former subsidiary of UGI Utilities if a court were to conclude that (1) the subsidiary’s separate corporate form should be disregarded, or (2) UGI Utilities should be considered to have been an operator because of its conduct with respect to its subsidiary’s MGP. At March 31, 2019, September 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018, neither the undiscounted nor the accrued liability for environmental investigation and cleanup costs for UGI Utilities’ MGP sites outside Pennsylvania was material.

Other Matters

Manor Township, Pennsylvania Natural Gas Explosion. On July 2, 2017, an explosion occurred in Manor Township, Pennsylvania which resulted in the death of one Company employee and injuries to two other Company employees and an employee of the local sewer authority, and significant property damage. The Company has received several claims for property damage and personal injuries related to the explosion but no civil lawsuit has been filed to date. On the regulatory side, on February 25, 2019, the NTSB issued a Pipeline Accident Brief of its investigation into the incident, in which it concluded that the explosion resulted from gas that migrated from an incorrectly installed mechanical tapping tee connecting the Company’s distribution main and service line to the home that exploded. In its report, the NTSB also restated its four recommendations that it issued in a June 25, 2018 preliminary report concerning the mechanical tapping tee manufacturer’s installation instructions and the oversight of mechanical tapping tees by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. With the issuance of the NTSB report, the one remaining regulatory matter arising from the incident is the BIE formal complaint before the PAPUC in which the BIE alleged that the Company committed multiple violations of federal and state gas pipeline regulations in connection with its emergency response leading up to the explosion and requested that the PAPUC order the Company to pay approximately $2,100 in civil penalties, which is the maximum allowable fine. On November 16, 2018, the Company filed its formal written answer contesting the BIE complaint.
The Company maintains workers’ compensation insurance and liability insurance for personal injury, property and casualty damages and anticipates that third-party claims associated with the explosion, in excess of the Company’s deductible, will be recovered through the Company’s insurance. Although the Company cannot predict the result of these pending or future claims, we believe that claims and expenses associated with the explosion will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In addition to the matters described above, there are other pending claims and legal actions arising in the normal course of our businesses. Although we cannot predict the final results of these pending claims and legal actions, we believe, after consultation with counsel, that the final outcome of these matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.