XML 36 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

We are exposed to certain market risks associated with our ongoing business operations. Management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments, among other things, to manage these risks. The primary risks managed by derivative instruments are (1) commodity price risk and (2) interest rate risk. Although we use derivative financial and commodity instruments to reduce market risk associated with forecasted transactions, we do not use derivative financial and commodity instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The use of derivative instruments is controlled by our risk management and credit policies which govern, among other things, the derivative instruments we can use, counterparty credit limits and contract authorization limits. Because most of our commodity derivative instruments are generally subject to regulatory ratemaking mechanisms, we have limited commodity price risk associated with our Gas Utility or Electric Utility operations. For more information on the accounting for our derivative instruments, see Note 2.
Commodity Price Risk

Gas Utility’s tariffs contain clauses that permit recovery of all of the prudently incurred costs of natural gas it sells to retail core-market customers, including the cost of financial instruments used to hedge purchased gas costs. As permitted and agreed to by the PUC pursuant to Gas Utility’s annual PGC filings, Gas Utility currently uses New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) natural gas futures and option contracts to reduce commodity price volatility associated with a portion of the natural gas it purchases for its retail core-market customers. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the volumes of natural gas associated with Gas Utility’s unsettled NYMEX natural gas futures and option contracts totaled 18.4 million dekatherms and 18.9 million dekatherms, respectively. At September 30, 2016, the maximum period over which Gas Utility is economically hedging natural gas market price risk is 12 months. Gains and losses on natural gas futures contracts and any gains on natural gas option contracts are recorded in regulatory assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets because it is probable such gains or losses will be recoverable from, or refundable to, customers through the PGC recovery mechanism (see Note 4).

Electric Utility’s DS tariffs permit the recovery of all prudently incurred costs of electricity it sells to DS customers, including the cost of financial instruments used to hedge electricity costs. Electric Utility enters into forward electricity purchase contracts to meet a substantial portion of its electricity supply needs. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, a majority of such contracts were subject to the NPNS exception under GAAP.

In order to reduce volatility associated with a substantial portion of its electricity transmission congestion costs, Electric Utility obtains FTRs through an annual allocation process. Gains and losses on Electric Utility FTRs are recorded in regulatory assets or liabilities in accordance with GAAP because it is probable such gains or losses will be recoverable from, or refundable to customers through the DS mechanism (see Note 4). At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the total volumes associated with FTRs totaled 58.3 million kilowatt hours and 277.1 million kilowatt hours, respectively. At September 30, 2016, the maximum period over which we are economically hedging electricity congestion is 8 months.

In order to reduce operating expense volatility, UGI Utilities from time to time enters into NYMEX gasoline futures contracts for a portion of gasoline volumes expected to be used in the operation of its vehicles and equipment. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, the gasoline volumes were not material.
Interest Rate Risk

Our long-term debt typically is issued at fixed rates of interest. As these long-term debt issues mature, we typically refinance such debt with new debt having interest rates reflecting then-current market conditions. In order to reduce market rate risk on the underlying benchmark rate of interest associated with near- to medium-term forecasted issuances of fixed-rate debt, from time to time we enter into interest rate protection agreements (“IRPAs”). We account for IRPAs as cash flow hedges. On March 31, 2016, concurrent with the pricing of the Senior Notes to be issued under the 2016 Note Purchase Agreement, UGI Utilities settled all of its then-existing IRPA contracts associated with such debt at a loss of $35,975. Because these IRPA contracts qualified for and were designated as cash flow hedges, the loss recognized in connection with the settled IRPAs has been recorded in AOCI and will be recognized in interest expense as the associated future interest expense impacts earnings. See Note 7 for additional information on the 2016 Note Purchase Agreement. At September 30, 2016, we had no unsettled IRPAs. At September 30, 2015, the total notional amount of our debt associated with unsettled IRPA contracts was $250,000.

At September 30, 2016, the amount of net losses associated with IRPAs expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months is $3,426.
Derivative Instrument Credit Risk
Our commodity exchange-traded futures contracts generally require cash deposits in margin accounts. At September 30, 2016 and 2015, restricted cash in brokerage accounts totaled $583 and $6,602, respectively.
Offsetting Derivative Assets and Liabilities
Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net by counterparty on our Consolidated Balance Sheets if the right of offset exists. Our derivative instruments include both those that are executed on an exchange through brokers and centrally cleared and over-the-counter transactions. Exchange contracts utilize a financial intermediary, exchange, or clearinghouse to enter, execute, or clear the transactions. Over-the-counter contracts are bilateral contracts that are transacted directly with a third party. Certain over-the-counter and exchange contracts contain contractual rights of offset through master netting arrangements, derivative clearing agreements, and contract default provisions. In addition, the contracts are subject to conditional rights of offset through counterparty nonperformance, insolvency, or other conditions.
In general, most of our over-the-counter transactions and all exchange contracts are subject to collateral requirements. Types of collateral generally include cash or letters of credit. Cash collateral paid by us to our over-the-counter derivative counterparties, if any, is reflected in the table below to offset derivative liabilities. Cash collateral received by us from our over-the-counter derivative counterparties, if any, is reflected in the table below to offset derivative assets. Certain other accounts receivable and accounts payable balances recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with our derivative counterparties are not included in the table below but could reduce our net exposure to such counterparties because such balances are subject to master netting or similar arrangements.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities, as well as the effects of offsetting, as of September 30, 2016 and 2015:
 
2016
 
2015
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
Derivatives subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
$
4,472

 
$
1,307

Derivatives not subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
38

 
—

Total derivative assets - gross
4,510

 
1,307

Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet
(247
)
 
(373
)
Total derivative assets - net
$
4,263

 
$
934

 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
—

 
$
(7,016
)
Derivatives subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
(499
)
 
(5,584
)
Derivatives not subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
(58
)
 
(364
)
Total derivative liabilities - gross
(557
)
 
(12,964
)
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet
247

 
373

Total derivative liabilities - net
$
(310
)
 
$
(12,591
)

Effect of Derivative Instruments
The following table provides information on the effects of derivative instruments not subject to ratemaking mechanisms on the Consolidated Statements of Income and changes in AOCI for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014:
 
Loss Recognized in AOCI
 
Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Income
 
Location of
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(28,958
)
 
$
(7,016
)
 
$
—

 
$
(2,680
)
 
$
(2,674
)
 
$
(2,679
)
 
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss Recognized in Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Location of Loss
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recognized in Income
Derivatives Not Subject to
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PGC and DS Mechanisms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gasoline contracts
$
(88
)
 
$
(761
)
 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating and administrative expenses/other operating income, net


The amounts of derivative gains and losses on cash flow hedges representing ineffectiveness were not material for all periods presented.

We are also a party to a number of other contracts that have elements of a derivative instrument. These contracts include, among others, binding purchase orders, contracts which provide for the purchase and delivery of natural gas and electricity, and service contracts that require the counterparty to provide commodity storage, transportation or capacity service to meet our normal sales commitments. Although many of these contracts have the requisite elements of a derivative instrument, these contracts qualify for normal purchase and normal sale exception accounting under GAAP because they provide for the delivery of products or services in quantities that are expected to be used in the normal course of operating our business and the price in the contract is based on an underlying that is directly associated with the price of the product or service being purchased or sold.