XML 61 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

We are exposed to certain market risks related to our ongoing business operations. Management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments, among other things, to manage these risks. The primary risks managed by derivative instruments are (1) commodity price risk and (2) interest rate risk. Although we use derivative financial and commodity instruments to reduce market risk associated with forecasted transactions, we do not use derivative financial and commodity instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The use of derivative instruments is controlled by our risk management and credit policies which govern, among other things, the derivative instruments we can use, counterparty credit limits and contract authorization limits. Because most of our commodity derivative instruments are generally subject to regulatory ratemaking mechanisms, we have limited commodity price risk associated with our Gas Utility or Electric Utility operations. For more information on the accounting for our derivative instruments, see Note 2.
Commodity Price Risk

Gas Utility’s tariffs contain clauses that permit recovery of all of the prudently incurred costs of natural gas it sells to retail core-market customers, including the cost of financial instruments used to hedge purchased gas costs. As permitted and agreed to by the PUC pursuant to Gas Utility’s annual PGC filings, Gas Utility currently uses New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) natural gas futures and option contracts to reduce commodity price volatility associated with a portion of the natural gas it purchases for its retail core-market customers. At September 30, 2015 and 2014, the volumes of natural gas associated with Gas Utility’s unsettled NYMEX natural gas futures and option contracts totaled 18.9 million dekatherms and 16.9 million dekatherms, respectively. At September 30, 2015, the maximum period over which Gas Utility is economically hedging natural gas market price risk is 12 months. Gains and losses on natural gas futures contracts and any gains on natural gas option contracts are recorded in regulatory assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets because it is probable such gains or losses will be recoverable from, or refundable to, customers through the PGC recovery mechanism (see Note 4).

Electric Utility’s DS tariffs permit the recovery of all prudently incurred costs of electricity it sells to DS customers, including the cost of financial instruments used to hedge electricity costs. Electric Utility enters into forward electricity purchase contracts to meet a substantial portion of its electricity supply needs. For such contracts entered into prior to March 1, 2015, Electric Utility chose to elect the NPNS exception under GAAP, related to these derivative instruments and the fair values of these contracts are reflected in current and noncurrent derivative instrument assets and liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Associated gains and losses on these forward contracts are recorded in regulatory assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with GAAP because it is probable such gains or losses will be recoverable from, or refundable to customers through the DS mechanism (see Note 4). Effective with Electric Utility forward electricity purchase contracts entered into beginning March 1, 2015, Electric Utility has elected the NPNS exception under GAAP and, as a result, the fair values of such contracts are not recognized on the balance sheet. At September 30, 2015 and 2014, the volumes of Electric Utility’s forward electricity purchase contracts were 331.0 million kilowatt hours and 237.0 million kilowatt hours, respectively. At September 30, 2015, the maximum period over which these contracts extend is 8 months.

In order to reduce volatility associated with a substantial portion of its electricity transmission congestion costs, Electric Utility obtains FTRs through an annual allocation process. Gains and losses on Electric Utility FTRs are recorded in regulatory assets or liabilities in accordance with GAAP because it is probable such gains or losses will be recoverable from, or refundable to customers through the DS mechanism (see Note 4). At September 30, 2015 and 2014, the total volumes associated with FTRs totaled 277.1 million kilowatt hours and 232.1 million kilowatt hours, respectively. At September 30, 2015, the maximum period over which we are economically hedging electricity congestion is 8 months.

In order to reduce operating expense volatility, UGI Utilities from time to time enters into NYMEX gasoline futures and swap contracts for a portion of gasoline volumes expected to be used in the operation of its vehicles and equipment.
Interest Rate Risk

Our long-term debt typically is issued at fixed rates of interest. As these long-term debt issues mature, we typically refinance such debt with new debt having interest rates reflecting then-current market conditions. In order to reduce market rate risk on the underlying benchmark rate of interest associated with near- to medium-term forecasted issuances of fixed-rate debt, from time to time we enter into IRPAs. We account for interest rate protection agreements (“IRPAs”) as cash flow hedges. As of September 30, 2015, the total notional amounts of our unsettled IRPA contracts was $250,000. At September 30 2014, we had no unsettled IRPAs. Our September 30, 2015, unsettled IRPA contracts hedge forecasted interest payments expected to occur over ten- and thirty-year periods beginning in Fiscal 2016.

At September 30, 2015, the amount of net losses associated with IRPAs expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months based upon current fair values is $2,463.
Derivative Instrument Credit Risk
Our commodity exchange-traded futures contracts generally require cash deposits in margin accounts. At September 30, 2015, restricted cash in brokerage accounts totaled $6,602. At September 30, 2014, there was $3,592 of restricted cash in brokerage accounts.
Offsetting Derivative Assets and Liabilities
Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net by counterparty on our Consolidated Balance Sheets if the right of offset exists. Our derivative instruments include both those that are executed on an exchange through brokers and centrally cleared and over-the-counter transactions. Exchange contracts utilize a financial intermediary, exchange, or clearinghouse to enter, execute, or clear the transactions. Over-the-counter contracts are bilateral contracts that are transacted directly with a third party. Certain over-the-counter and exchange contracts contain contractual rights of offset through master netting arrangements, derivative clearing agreements, and contract default provisions. In addition, the contracts are subject to conditional rights of offset through counterparty nonperformance, insolvency, or other conditions.
In general, most of our over-the-counter transactions and all exchange contracts are subject to collateral requirements. Types of collateral generally include cash or letters of credit. Cash collateral paid by us to our over-the-counter derivative counterparties, if any, is reflected in the table below to offset derivative liabilities. Cash collateral received by us from our over-the-counter derivative counterparties, if any, is reflected in the table below to offset derivative assets. Certain other accounts receivable and accounts payable balances recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with our derivative counterparties are not included in the table below but could reduce our net exposure to such counterparties because such balances are subject to master netting or similar arrangements.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, as well as the effects of offsetting, as of September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
2015
 
2014
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
Derivatives subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
$
1,307

 
$
1,697

Total derivative assets - gross
1,307

 
1,697

Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet
(373
)
 
(669
)
Total derivative assets - net
$
934

 
$
1,028

 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(7,016
)
 
$
—

Derivatives subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
(5,584
)
 
(2,210
)
Derivatives not subject to PGC and DS mechanisms:
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
(364
)
 
(91
)
Total derivative liabilities - gross
(12,964
)
 
(2,301
)
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet
373

 
669

Total derivative liabilities - net
$
(12,591
)
 
$
(1,632
)

Effect of Derivative Instruments
The following table provides information on the effects of derivative instruments not subject to ratemaking mechanisms on the Consolidated Statements of Income and changes in AOCI for Fiscal 2015, Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013:
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI
 
Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Income
 
Location of
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Cash Flow Hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(7,016
)
 
$
—

 
$
25,898

 
$
(2,674
)
 
$
(2,679
)
 
$
(805
)
 
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recognized in Income
Derivatives Not Subject to
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PGC and DS Mechanisms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gasoline contracts
$
(761
)
 
$
—

 
$
45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating and administrative expenses/other income, net


The amounts of derivative gains and losses on cash flow hedges representing ineffectiveness were not material for all periods presented.

We are also a party to a number of other contracts that have elements of a derivative instrument. These contracts include, among others, binding purchase orders, contracts which provide for the purchase and delivery of natural gas, and service contracts that require the counterparty to provide commodity storage, transportation or capacity service to meet our normal sales commitments. Although many of these contracts have the requisite elements of a derivative instrument, these contracts qualify for normal purchase and normal sale exception accounting under GAAP because they provide for the delivery of products or services in quantities that are expected to be used in the normal course of operating our business and the price in the contract is based on an underlying that is directly associated with the price of the product or service being purchased or sold.