XML 94 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
To determine the fair value of our assets and liabilities, we utilize the established fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Derivative Financial Instruments
Currently, we use derivative financial arrangements to manage a variety of risk exposures, including interest rate risk associated with our Long-term debt and foreign currency risk relating to cross-currency intercompany lending and merchandise purchases. The valuation of our foreign currency contracts is determined using market-based foreign exchange rates, which are classified as Level 2 inputs.
The valuation of our interest rate contracts is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates and implied volatilities. We evaluate the inputs used to value our derivatives at the end of each reporting period.
For our interest rate contracts, we primarily use Level 2 inputs mentioned above to arrive at fair value. Additionally, for interest rate contracts we also incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements taking into account the impact of any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. We measure the credit risk of our derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. The portfolio-level adjustments are then allocated each period to the individual assets or liabilities within the portfolio.
The credit valuation adjustments are calculated by determining the total expected exposure of the derivatives (which incorporates both the current and potential future exposure) and then applying each counterparty’s credit spread to the applicable exposure. The total expected exposure of a derivative is derived using market-observable inputs, such as yield curves and volatilities. The inputs utilized for our own credit spread are based on implied spreads from our debt, which are considered unobservable inputs. These credit valuation adjustments fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and include estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. For counterparties with publicly available credit information, the credit spreads over LIBOR used in the calculations represent implied credit default swap spreads obtained from a third party credit data provider. Generally, significant increases (decreases) in our own credit spread in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement for these derivatives. Based on the mixed input valuation, we classify these derivatives based on the lowest level in the fair value hierarchy that is significant to the overall fair value of the instrument.
Any transfer into or out of a level of the fair value hierarchy is recognized based on the value of the instruments at the end of the reporting period.
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, aggregated by level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Fiscal 2014
(In millions)
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Foreign exchange contracts
 

 
2

 

 
2

Total liabilities
 
$

 
$
2

 
$

 
$
2

Fiscal 2013
(In millions)
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
$

 
$
13

 
$

 
$
13

Foreign exchange contracts
 

 

 

 

Total assets
 
$

 
$
13

 
$

 
$
13

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

Foreign exchange contracts
 

 

 

 

Total liabilities
 
$

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1


For the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, we had no derivative financial instruments within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain of our assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. We evaluate the carrying value of all long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The fair value measurements related to long-lived assets held and used classified as Level 3 were determined using a discounted cash flow valuation method or a relative, market-based approach based on purchase offers or appraisals we have received from third parties. The inputs we use to calculate discounted cash flows include the projected cash flows for the asset group (generally by store location) and, when significant, a risk-adjusted rate of return we estimate would be used by a market participant in valuing the assets. The projected cash flows are based on the Company’s sales, gross margin and expense forecasts for each asset group, taking into consideration historical cash flows, as well as anticipated costs and/or proceeds from disposal. For our market-based valuations, we use purchase offers we receive from third parties, predominantly for our properties, which are classified as Level 3 because they are not received in an organized market or observable to market participants. Alternatively, when management commits to sell properties and no third party offers exist, we use asset appraisals conducted by external specialists with experience in real estate valuations. These require a significant amount of judgment regarding appropriate comparable properties and their assessment of current market conditions.
For the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, we had no impairments to long-lived assets held for sale. There have been no changes in valuation technique or related inputs for long-lived assets for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014. During fiscal 2014, management determined that fair values based on offers received should be reclassified to Level 3. The impact of this change on the prior period was deemed immaterial.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually or whenever we identify certain events or circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The fair value measurements related to goodwill are classified as Level 3 and were determined by blending results from the market multiples approach and the income approach. These valuation approaches consider a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, growth rates, discount rates, and comparable multiples from publicly-traded companies in our industry, and require us to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and future profitability of our business. Refer to Note 1 entitled “SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” for further details on the valuation technique and related inputs for goodwill. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015, we had no goodwill impairment. There have been no changes in valuation technique or related inputs for goodwill for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014.
The table below presents our long-lived assets and goodwill evaluated for impairment and measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, aggregated by level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall. Because these assets are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, certain carrying amounts and fair value measurements presented in the table may reflect values at earlier measurement dates and may no longer represent their fair values at January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014. As of January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, we did not have any long-lived assets or goodwill classified as Level 1 or Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy, respectively.
Fiscal 2014
(In millions)
 
Carrying Value Prior to Impairment
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Impairment
Losses (1)
Long-lived assets held and used
 
$
20

 
$
7

 
$
13

Total
 
$
20

 
$
7

 
$
13

Fiscal 2013
(In millions)
 
Carrying Value Prior to Impairment
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) (2)
 
Impairment
Losses (1)
Long-lived assets held and used
 
$
68

 
$
24

 
$
44

Goodwill (3)
 
445

 
64

 
378

Total
 
$
513

 
$
88

 
$
422



(1)
Refer to Note 1 entitled “SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” for further details.
(2)
Includes fair values based on offers received of $11 million as of February 1, 2014 which were previously classified as Level 2 and should have been Level 3.
(3)
Includes foreign currency translation of $3 million.
Other Financial Instruments
The fair values of our Long-term debt including current portion are estimated using quoted market prices for the same or similar issues and other pertinent information available to management as of the end of the respective periods. The fair values of debt instruments classified as Level 1 are based on quoted prices in reasonably active markets and Level 2 instruments are valued using market prices we obtain from external third parties. Debt instruments classified as Level 3 are not publicly traded, and therefore we are unable to obtain quoted market prices, and are generally valued using estimated spreads, a present value calculation or a cash flow analysis, as appropriate. There have been no significant changes in valuation technique or related inputs for Long-term debt for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014. The table below presents the carrying values and fair values of our Long-term debt including current portion as of January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014, aggregated by level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
 
 
Long-term Debt
(In millions)
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
January 31, 2015
 
$
4,788

 
$
4,416

 
$
1,346

 
$
2,315

 
$
755

February 1, 2014
 
5,007

 
4,541

 
1,411

 
2,303

 
827


Other financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and short-term borrowings. Due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities, their carrying amounts approximate fair value.