XML 33 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES [Abstract]  
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
11.
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
 
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.  Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, such derivatives were used to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with wholesale borrowings, i.e., FHBLNY advances.  The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivatives are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are paid on the Company’s liabilities.  During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that $525 will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition:

  
At December 31, 2017
  
At December 31, 2016
 
  
Count
  
Notional
Amount
  
Fair Value
Assets
  
Fair Value
Liabilities
  
Count
  
Notional
Amount
  
Fair Value
Assets
  
Fair Value
Liabilities
 
Included in other assets/(liabilities):
                        
Interest rate swaps related to
FHLBNY advances
  
7
  
$
135,000
  
$
4,041
  
$
-
   
4
  
$
90,000
  
$
3,228
  
$
-
 
                                 
Weighted average pay rates
      
1.46
%
              
1.24
%
        
Weighted average receive rates
      
1.51
%
              
0.95
%
        
Weighted average maturity
     
4.29 years
              
5.32 years
         
 
The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as the amount of gain or (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the periods indicated:

  
At or for the Year
Ended December 31,
 
  
2017
  
2016
 
Interest rate products
      
Effective portion:
      
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income
 
$
511
  
$
3,205
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from other comprehensive income into interest expense
  
283
   
23
 
Ineffective Portion:
        
Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in other  non-interest expense
  
-
   
-
 

The Company’s  agreements with each of its derivative counterparties state that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, it could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations and could be required to terminate its derivative positions with the counterparty.

The Company’s agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties state that if the Bank fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, the Bank could be required to terminate its derivative positions with the counterparty.

As of December 31, 2017, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $4,026. If the Company had breached any of the above provisions at December 31, 2017, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty. There were no provisions breached for the period ended December 31, 2017.