17. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value hierarchy established under ASC 820-10 is summarized as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs – Significant other observable inputs such as any of the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates), or (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

Level 3 Inputs – Significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Significant unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Significant unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The following tables present the assets that are reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value as of the date indicated by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at December 31, 2013
			Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Total		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Gains(Losses) for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Trading securities (Registered Mutual Funds):
Domestic Equity Mutual Funds	$	1,311	$	1,311	$	-	$	-	$	290
International Equity Mutual Funds		164		164		-		-		23
Fixed Income Mutual Funds		5,347		5,347		-		-		(48	)
Investment securities available-for-sale:
Agency notes		15,091		-		15,091		-		-
Registered Mutual Funds:
Domestic Equity Mutual Funds		2,016		2,016		-		-		-
International Equity Mutual Funds		427		427		-		-		-
Fixed Income Mutual Funds		1,115		1,115		-		-		-
Pass-through MBS issued by GSEs		29,959		-		29,959		-		-
CMOs issued by GSEs		321		-		321		-		-
Private issuer pass through MBS		680		-		680		-		-
Private issuer CMOs		583		-		583		-		-

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at December 31, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Total		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Gains for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Trading Securities (Registered Mutual Funds)
Domestic Equity Mutual Funds	$	930	$	930	$	-	$	-	$	89
International Equity Mutual Funds		129		129		-		-		12
Fixed Income Mutual Funds		3,815		3,815		-		-		11
Investment securities available-for-sale:
Agency notes		29,945		-		29,945		-		-
Registered Mutual Funds:
Domestic Equity Mutual Funds		1,502		1,502		-		-		-
International Equity Mutual Funds		358		358		-		-		-
Fixed Income Mutual Funds		1,145		1,145		-		-		-
Pass-through MBS issued by GSEs		44,678		-		44,678		-		-
CMOs issued by GSEs		2,462		-		2,462		-		-
Private issuer pass through MBS		955		-		955		-		-
Private issuer CMOs		926		-		926		-		-

The Company's available-for-sale investment securities and MBS are reported at fair value, which were determined utilizing prices obtained from independent parties. The valuations obtained are based upon market data, and often utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (obtained only from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. For certain securities, additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Prioritization of inputs may vary on any given day based on market conditions.

With one immaterial exception, the agency notes and MBS owned by the Company possessed the highest possible credit rating published by at least one established credit rating agency as of both December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Obtaining market values as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 for these securities utilizing significant observable inputs was not difficult due to their continued marketplace demand.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis at December 31, 2013
			Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Total		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs
Impaired loans:
One- to Four Family Residential, Including Condominium and Cooperative Apartment		477		-		-		477
Multifamily Residential and Residential Mixed Use Real Estate		325		-		-		325
Commercial Mixed Use Real Estate		4,400		-		-		4,400
Commercial Real Estate		5,707		-		-		5,707

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis at December 31, 2012
				Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Total			Level 1 Inputs			Level 2 Inputs			Level 3 Inputs
Impaired loans:
Multifamily Residential and Residential Mixed Use Real Estate		$	450		$	-		$	-		$	450
Commercial Real Estate			6,472			-			-			6,472

Impaired Loans - Loans with certain characteristics are evaluated individually for impairment. A loan is considered impaired under ASC 310-10-35 when, based upon existing information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Bank's impaired loans at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were collateralized by real estate and were thus carried at the lower of the outstanding principal balance or the estimated fair value of the collateral. Fair value is estimated through either a negotiated note sale value (Level 2 input), or, more commonly, a recent real estate appraisal (Level 3 input). These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

An appraisal is generally ordered for all impaired multifamily residential, mixed use or commercial real estate loans for which the most recent appraisal is more than one year old. The Bank never adjusts independent appraisal data upward. Occasionally, management will adjust independent appraisal data downward based upon its own lending expertise and/or experience with the subject property, utilizing such factors as potential note sale values, or a more refined estimate of costs to repair and time to lease the property. Adjustments for potential disposal costs are also considered when determining the final appraised value.

As of December 31, 2013, impaired loans measured for impairment using the estimated fair value of the collateral had an aggregate principal balance of $12,392, , and a valuation allowance of $1,320 within the allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2012, impaired loans measured for impairment using the estimated fair value of the collateral had an aggregate principal balance of $6,922, and no valuation allowance within the allowance for loan losses. The recognition of the $1,320 valuation allowance impacted the provision for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 2013. Otherwise, these loans had no impact on the provision for loan losses.

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for impaired loans measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2013:

Fair Value Derived		Valuation Technique Utilized	Significant Unobservable Input(s)	Minimum Value			Maximum Value			Weighted Average Value
$	4,607	Income approach only	Capitalization rate		N/A	(1)		N/A	*		7.5	%
			Reduction for planned expedited disposal		N/A	(1)		N/A	*		0.4	%

	802	Blended income and sales comparison approaches	Reduction to the sales comparison value to reconcile differences between comparable sales		0.0	%-		15.0	%		5.0	%
			Capitalization rate (income approach component)		7.8	%		8.5	%		8.3	%
			Reduction for planned expedited disposal		20.0	%		30.0	%		26.0	%
	5,500	Previously negotiated note sales	Discount to unpaid principal balance from likely realizable value of a note sale based upon comparable note sale experience		N/A	(1)		N/A	(1)		17.0	%

(1) Only one loan in this population.

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for impaired loans measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2012:

Fair Value Derived	Valuation Technique Utilized	Significant Unobservable Input(s)	Minimum Value	Maximum Value	Weighted Average Value
$207	Income approach only	Capitalization rate	N/A(1)	N/A(1)	7.5%
		Reduction for planned expedited disposal	N/A(1)	N/A(1)	10.0%

1,215	Blended income and sales comparison approaches	Reduction to the sales comparison value to reconcile differences between comparable sales	0.0%	6.0%	3.8%
		Capitalization rate (income approach component)	7.3%	7.5%	7.4%
		Reduction for planned expedited disposal	10.0%	25.0%	15.6%
5,500	Previously negotiated note sales	Discount to unpaid principal balance from likely realizable value of a note sale based upon comparable note sale experience	N/A(1)	N/A(1)	17.0%

(1) Only one loan in this population.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

			Fair Value at December 31, 2013 Using
At December 31, 2013	Carrying Amount		Level 1 Inputs			Level 2 Inputs			Level 3 Inputs			Total
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	45,777	$	45,777			-			-		$	45,777
Investment securities held to maturity (TRUPS)		5,341		-			-			5,163			5,163
Loans, net		3,679,366		-			-			3,718,604			3,718,604
Premises held for sale		3,624		-			4,400			-			4,400
Accrued interest receivable		12,066		-			178			11,888			12,066
MSR		628		-			1,006			-			1,006
FHLBNY capital stock		48,051		n/	a		n/	a		n/	a		n/	a
Liabilities:
Savings, money market and checking accounts		1,678,737		1,678,737			-			-			1,678,737
CDs		828,409		-			839,059			-			839,059
Escrow and other deposits		69,404		69,404			-			-			69,404
FHLBNY Advances		910,000		-			934,336			-			934,336
Trust Preferred securities payable		70,680		-			70,680			-			70,680
Accrued interest payable		2,642		-			2,642			-			2,642

			Fair Value at December 31, 2012 Using
At December 31, 2012	Carrying Amount		Level 1 Inputs			Level 2 Inputs			Level 3 Inputs			Total
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	79,076	$	79,076			-			-		$	79,076
Investment securities held to maturity (TRUPS)		5,927		-			-			6,195			6,195
Loans, net		3,485,258		-			-			3,610,065			3,610,065
Loans held for sale		560		-			560			-			560
Accrued interest receivable		13,518		-			359			13,159			13,518
MSR		1,115		-			1,511			-			1,511
FHLBNY capital stock		45,011		N/	A		N/	A		N/	A		N/	A
Liabilities:
Savings, money market and checking accounts		1,587,454		1,587,454			-			-			1,587,454
CDs		891,975		-			907,657			-			907,657
Escrow and other deposits		82,753		82,753			-			-			82,753
FHLBNY Advances		842,500		-			885,774			-			885,774
Trust Preferred securities payable		70,680		-			70,680			-			70,680
Accrued interest payable		2,528		-			2,827			-			2,827

Methods and assumptions used to estimate fair values for financial assets and liabilities other than those previously discussed are summarized as follows:

Cash and Due From Banks – The fair value is assumed to be equal to their carrying value as these amounts are due upon demand (deemed a Level 1 valuation).

Federal Funds Sold and Other Short Term Investments – As a result of their short duration to maturity, the fair value of these assets, principally overnight deposits, is assumed to be equal to their carrying value due (deemed a Level 1 valuation).

TRUPS Held to Maturity – At both December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company owned seven TRUPS classified as held-to-maturity. Late in 2008, the market for these securities became illiquid, and continued to be deemed illiquid as of December 31, 2013. As a result, at both December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, their estimated fair value was obtained utilizing a blended valuation approach (Level 3 pricing). Under the blended valuation approach, the Bank utilized the following valuation sources: 1) broker quotations, which were deemed to meet the criteria of "distressed sale" pricing under the guidance of ASC 820-10-65-4, were given a minor 10% weighting (deemed to be a Level 2 valuation); 2) an internally created cash flow valuation model that considered the creditworthiness of each individual issuer underlying the collateral pools, and utilized default, cash flow and discount rate assumptions determined by the Company's management (the "Internal Cash Flow Valuation"), was given a 45%

weighting (deemed to be a Level 3 valuation); and 3) a minimum of two of three available independent cash flow valuation models were averaged and given a 45% weighting (deemed to be a Level 3 valuation for which the Company is not provided detailed information regarding the significant unobservable inputs utilized by the third party).

The major assumptions utilized in the Internal Cash Flow Valuation (each of which represents a significant unobservable input as defined by ASC 820-10) were as follows:

(i) Discount Rate – Pursuant to ASC 320-10-65, the Company utilized two different discount rates for discounting the cash flows for each of the seven TRUPS, as follows:

(1) Purchase discount rate – the rate used to determine the "credit" based valuation of the security. The purchase discount rates utilized to compute fair value as of December 31, 2013 ranged from 1.6%% to 2.4%, with a weighted average value of 2.2%.

(2) Current discount rate – the current discount rate utilized was derived from the Bloomberg fair market value curve for debt offerings of similar credit rating. In the event that a security had a split credit rating, separate cash flow valuations were made utilizing the appropriate discount rate and were averaged in order to determine the Internal Cash Flow Valuation. In addition, the discount rate was interpolated from the Bloomberg fair market value curve for securities possessing a credit rating below "B." The existing discount rates utilized to compute fair value as of December 31, 2013 ranged from 5.1% to 8.6%, with a weighted average value of 6.1%.

(ii) Defaults – The Company utilized the most recently published measures of capital adequacy and/or problematic assets to estimate potential defaults in the collateral pool of performing issuers underlying the seven securities. In instances where problematic assets equaled or exceeded the issuer's regulatory capital, or the issuer's capital level fell below the limits established by the regulatory agencies, defaults were deemed probable to occur. Based upon the application of this methodology, the computed default rates utilized in the determination of the fair value of the TRUPS as of December 31, 2013 ranged from 0.0% to 4.0% of the performing security pool balance, with a weighted average rate of 1.1%. The Company additionally utilized a standard default rate of 1.2% every three years, which was applied uniformly.

(iii) Cash Flows – The expected payments for the tranche of each security owned by the Company, as adjusted to assume that all estimated defaults occur immediately. The cash flows further assumed an estimated recovery rate of 10.0% per annum to occur one year after initial default, which was applied uniformly.

As discussed above, in addition to the Internal Cash Flow Valuation and broker quotations, at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company utilized a minimum of two additional cash flow valuation models in order to estimate the fair value of TRUPS. Two of the three independent cash flow valuation models utilized a methodology similar to the Internal Cash Flow Valuation, differing only in the underlying assumptions utilized to derive estimated cash flows, individual bank defaults and discount rate. At December 31, 2012, a third independent cash flow valuation model was utilized which was derived from a different methodology in which the actual cash flow estimate based upon the underlying collateral of the securities (including default estimates) was not considered. Instead, this cash flow valuation model utilized a discount rate determined from the Bloomberg fair market value curve for similar assets that continued to trade actively, with adjustments made for the illiquidity of the TRUPS market. This valuation model was not utilized as of December 31, 2013 as its rendered valuation was not deemed indicative of current market pricing. Weighting was applied, as deemed appropriate, to all valuations utilized at each period end, including the Internal Cash Flow Valuation.

Loans, Net – The fair value of impaired loans that are measured at fair value is determined in the manner described commencing on page F-114. For adjustable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of all remaining loans receivable is determined by discounting anticipated future cash flows of the loans, net of anticipated prepayments, using a discount rate reflecting current market rates for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The valuation method used for loans does not necessarily represent an exit price valuation methodology as defined under ASC 820. However, since the valuation methodology is deemed to be akin to a Level 3 valuation methodology, the fair value of loans receivable other than impaired loans measured at fair value, is shown under the Level 3 valuation column.

Premises Held For Sale – The fair value of premises held for sale is determined utilizing an executed sales price (pending closing) or an independent property appraisal utilizing comparable sales data (either deemed a Level 2 valuation).

Accrued Interest Receivable – The estimated fair value of accrued interest receivable approximates its carrying amount, and is deemed to be valued at an input level comparable to its underlying financial asset.

MSR – On a quarterly basis, the aggregate balance of the MSR is evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to their carrying amount. If the aggregate carrying amount of the MSR exceeds fair value, impairment is recorded on the MSR so that they are carried at fair value. Fair value is determined based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model utilizes assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income and that can be validated against available market data (Level 2 input).

FHLBNY Capital Stock – It is not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLBNY capital stock due to restrictions placed on transferability.

Deposits – The fair value of savings, money market, and checking accounts is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amount), which has been deemed a Level 1 valuation. The fair value of CDs is based upon the present value of contractual cash flows using current interest rates for instruments of the same remaining maturity (deemed a Level 2 valuation).

Escrow and Other Deposits – The fair value of escrow and other deposits is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amount), which has been deemed a Level 1 valuation.

REPOS and FHLBNY Advances – REPOS are accounted for as financing transactions. Their fair value is measured by the discounted anticipated cash flows through contractual maturity or next interest repricing date, or an earlier call date if, as of the valuation date, the borrowing is expected to be called (deemed a Level 2 valuation). The carrying amount of accrued interest payable on REPOS and FHLBNY Advances is its fair value and is deemed a Level 2 valuation.

Trust Preferred Securities Payable – The fair value of trust preferred securities payable is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements (deemed a Level 2 valuation), and is provided to the Company quarterly independently by a market maker in the underlying security.

Accrued Interest Payable – The estimated fair value of accrued interest payable approximates its carrying amount, and is deemed to be valued at an input level comparable to its underlying financial liability.