XML 75 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
FAIR VALUE
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE
FAIR VALUE

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
 
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following tables represent the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
September 30, 2019
 
Financial Statement Classification
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collegium warrants
 
Investments
 
$

 
$
3,884

 
$

 
$
3,884

Total
 
 
 
$

 
$
3,884

 
$

 
$
3,884

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration—Zipsor
 
Contingent consideration liability
 
$

 
$

 
$
430

 
$
430

Contingent consideration—CAMBIA
 
Contingent consideration liability
 

 

 
551

 
551

Total
 
 
 
$

 
$

 
$
981

 
$
981

December 31, 2018
 
Financial Statement Classification
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
11

 
$

 
$

 
$
11

Commercial paper
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 

 
14,028

 

 
14,028

Agency bond
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 

 
1,250

 

 
1,250

Collegium warrants
 
Investments
 

 
8,784

 

 
8,784

Total
 
 
 
$
11

 
$
24,062

 
$

 
$
24,073

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration—Zipsor
 
Contingent consideration liability
 
$

 
$

 
$
531

 
$
531

Contingent consideration—CAMBIA
 
Contingent consideration liability
 

 

 
507

 
507

Total
 
 
 
$

 
$

 
$
1,038

 
$
1,038


 
The Company invests its cash in money market funds and marketable securities including U.S. Treasury and government agency securities, and commercial paper. These investments are all highly liquid investments with a maturity at date of purchase of three months or less. These securities are carried at fair value, which is based on readily available quoted market information. Realized gains or losses have been insignificant and are included in Other (expense) income, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The fair value of the warrants to purchase Collegium’s common stock is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company recorded a loss of $1.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively, in Other (expense) income, net for the change in fair value of the Collegium warrants. The Collegium warrants were obtained in November 2018 and therefore there were no fair value adjustments recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration obligations arises from the Zipsor and CAMBIA acquisitions and relates to fair value of the potential future contingent milestone payments and royalties payable under the respective agreements which are determined using Level 3 inputs. The key assumptions in determining the fair value are the discount rate and the probability assigned to the potential milestones and royalties being achieved. At each reporting date, the Company re-measures the contingent consideration obligation arising from the above acquisitions to their estimated fair values. Any changes in the fair value of contingent consideration resulting from a change in the underlying inputs are recognized in operating expenses until the contingent consideration arrangement is settled. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation resulting from the passage of time are recorded within interest expense until the contingent consideration is settled. The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value recorded in interest expense and selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2019
 
2018
Fair value, beginning of the period
 
$
953

 
$
967

 
$
1,038

 
$
1,613

Changes in fair value recorded in interest expense
 
28

 
27

 
85

 
106

Changes in fair value recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses
 

 
(117
)
 
(142
)
 
(658
)
Royalties and milestone paid
 

 

 

 
(184
)
Fair value, end of the period
 
$
981

 
$
877

 
$
981

 
$
877


 
The Company estimates the fair value of its convertible notes based on a market approach which represents a Level 2 valuation. The estimated fair value of the 2.50% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2021, which the Company issued on September 9, 2014, was approximately $108.0 million (par value $145.0 million) and $231.8 million (par value $345.0 million) as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The estimated fair value of the 5.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2024, which the Company issued on August 13, 2019, was approximately $91.9 million (par value $120.0 million) as of September 30, 2019. The principal amount of the Senior Notes (as defined in “Note 9. Debt”), approximates their fair value as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively and represents a Level 2 valuation. When determining the estimated fair value of the Company’s debt, the Company uses a commonly accepted valuation methodology and market-based risk measurements that are indirectly observable, such as credit risk. 
 
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.