UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
| | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended
OR
| | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number:
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
120 Calle Iglesia
Unit B
Fax: 888.312.0124
(Address and telephone number of registrant's principal
executive offices and principal place of business)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class of Security | Trading Symbol | Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
| | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |
| | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | | |
| Emerging growth company | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
The registrant’s common stock began trading on the NYSE American exchange on March 10, 2022. The registrant had
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Table of Contents
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or our future financial or operating performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “shall,” “might,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these words or other similar terms or expressions that concern our expectations, strategy, plans, or intentions. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements about:
| • |
the outcome of the class action litigation; |
|
| • |
recent resolutions with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) against United States Oil Fund, L.P., United States Commodity Funds, LLC, a subsidiary of our subsidiary, USCF Investments, Inc. ("USCF Investments") (f/k/a Wainwright Holdings), and other related parties, as disclosed under “Item 1. Legal Proceedings”; |
|
| • |
our future financial performance, including our revenue, cost of revenue, gross profit, gross margin, operating expenses, ability to generate positive cash flow, and ability to achieve and maintain profitability; and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon; |
|
| • |
the sufficiency of our cash and cash equivalents to meet our working capital, capital expenditure, and liquidity needs; and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon; |
|
| • |
our operating subsidiaries' ability to attract and retain customers to use our products, to optimize the pricing for our products, to expand our sales to our customers, and to convince our existing customers to renew subscriptions; |
|
| • |
the evolution of technologies affecting our operating subsidiaries' products and markets; |
|
| • |
our operating subsidiaries' ability to innovate and provide a superior user experience and our intentions and strategy with respect thereto; |
|
| • |
our operating subsidiaries' ability to successfully penetrate enterprise markets; and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon; |
|
| • |
our operating subsidiaries' ability to successfully expand in our existing markets and into new markets, including international markets; and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon; |
|
| • |
the attraction and retention of key personnel; |
|
| • |
our ability to effectively manage our growth and future expenses; |
|
| • |
worldwide economic conditions, including the economic disruption imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and their impact on spending; and |
|
| • |
our operating subsidiaries' ability to comply with modified or new laws and regulations applying to our business, including privacy and data security regulations. |
We caution you that the foregoing list does not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors described in the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2022, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or our registration statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, we and our subsidiaries operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We cannot assure you that the results, events, and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results, events, or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. We and our subsidiaries may not actually achieve the plans, intentions, or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures, or investments we may make.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| Item 1. Financial Statements. |
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
| September 30, 2022 | June 30, 2022 (1) | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable - related parties | ||||||||
| Inventories | ||||||||
| Prepaid income tax and tax receivable | ||||||||
| Investments, at fair value | ||||||||
| Other current assets | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| Restricted cash | ||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use asset | ||||||||
| Goodwill | ||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | ||||||||
| Deferred tax assets, net - United States | ||||||||
| Other assets, long - term | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Expense waivers – related parties | ||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, current portion | ||||||||
| Purchase consideration payable | ||||||||
| Loans - property and equipment, current portion | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Loans - property and equipment, net of current portion | ||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | ||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities, net-foreign | ||||||||
| Total long-term liabilities | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $ par value; shares authorized | ||||||||
| Series B: shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2022 and at June 30, 2022 | ||||||||
| Common stock, $ par value; shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2022 and at June 30, 2022 | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Retained earnings | ||||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | ||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | $ | ||||||
(1) Derived from audited financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 | |||||||
| Net revenue | ||||||||
| Fund management - related party | $ | $ | ||||||
| Food products | ||||||||
| Security systems | ||||||||
| Beauty products | ||||||||
| Financial services | ||||||||
| Net revenue | ||||||||
| Cost of revenue | ||||||||
| Gross profit | ||||||||
| Operating expense | ||||||||
| Salaries and compensation | ||||||||
| General and administrative expense | ||||||||
| Fund operations | ||||||||
| Marketing and advertising | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||
| Legal settlement | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other (expense) income: | ||||||||
| Interest and dividend income | ||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Other (expense) income | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total other (expense) income, net | ( | ) | ||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | ( | ) | ||||||
| Provision of income taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Weighted average shares of common stock | ||||||||
| Basic | ||||||||
| Diluted | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) per common share | ||||||||
| Basic and diluted | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 | |||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Other comprehensive (loss): | ||||||
| Foreign currency translation loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||
| Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
(UNAUDITED)
| Period Ending September 30, 2022 | Preferred Stock (Series B) | Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Amount | Number of Shares | Par Value | Additional Paid - in Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) | Retained Earnings | Total Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at July 1, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on currency translation | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at September 30, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Period Ending September 30, 2021 |
Preferred Stock (Series B) |
Common Stock |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares |
Amount |
Number of Shares |
Par Value |
Additional Paid - in Capital |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Retained Earnings |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at July 1, 2021 |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss on currency translation |
- | - | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss |
- | - | ( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at September 30, 2021 |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| For the Three Month Period Ended | ||||||||
| September 30, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | ||||||||
| Unrealized loss on investments | ||||||||
| Loss on disposal of equipment | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use asset - non-cash lease cost | ||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in current assets: | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accounts receivable - related party | ||||||||
| Prepaid income taxes and tax receivable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Inventories | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Decrease (increase) in current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and legal settlement | ( | ) | ||||||
| Operating lease liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Expense waivers - related party | ||||||||
| Purchase consideration payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | ||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from sale of investments | ||||||||
| Purchase of investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | ( | ) | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Repayment of property and equipment loans | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | ||||||||
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING BALANCE | ||||||||
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, ENDING BALANCE | $ | $ | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||
| Restricted cash | ||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in statement of cash flows | $ | $ | ||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
| Interest paid | $ | $ | ||||||
| Income taxes paid, net | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALS STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| NOTE 1. | ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS |
The Marygold Companies, Inc., (the “Company” or "The Marygold Companies"), a Nevada corporation, operates through its wholly owned subsidiaries who are engaged in varied business activities. The operations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are more particularly described herein but are summarized as follows:
| ● | USCF Investments, Inc. (“USCF Investments”), a U.S. based company, is the sole member of two investment services limited liability company subsidiaries that manages, operates or is an investment advisor to exchange traded funds organized as limited partnerships or investment trusts that issue shares that trade on the NYSE Arca stock exchange. | |
| ● | Gourmet Foods, Ltd., a New Zealand based company, manufactures and distributes New Zealand meat pies on a commercial scale and its wholly-owned New Zealand subsidiary company, Printstock Products Limited, prints specialty wrappers for the food industry in New Zealand and Australia. (collectively "Gourmet Foods") | |
| ● | Brigadier Security Systems (2000) Ltd. (“Brigadier”), a Canadian based company, sells and installs commercial and residential alarm monitoring systems. | |
| ● | Kahnalytics, Inc. dba/Original Sprout (“Original Sprout”), a U.S. based company, is engaged in the wholesale distribution of hair and skin care products under the brand name Original Sprout on a global scale. | |
| ● | Marygold & Co., a newly formed U.S. based company, together with its wholly-owned limited liability company, Marygold & Co. Advisory Services, LLC, (collectively "Marygold") was established by The Marygold Companies to explore opportunities in the financial technology ("Fintech") space, still in the development stage as of September 30, 2022, and estimated to launch commercial services in the coming fiscal year. Through September 30, 2022, expenditures have been limited to developing the business model and the associated application development. | |
| ● | Marygold & Co. (UK) Limited, a newly formed U.K. limited company, together with its newly acquired UK subsidiary, Tiger Financial and Asset Management, Ltd. (collectively “Marygold UK”) is an asset manager and registered investment advisor in the UK. Operations began on June 20, 2022. |
The Marygold Companies manages its operating businesses on a decentralized basis. There are no centralized or integrated operational functions such as marketing, sales, legal or other professional services and there is little involvement by The Marygold Companies’ management in the day-to-day business affairs of its operating subsidiary businesses apart from oversight. The Marygold Companies’ corporate management is responsible for capital allocation decisions, investment activities and selection and retention of the Chief Executive to head each of the operating subsidiaries. The Marygold Companies’ corporate management is also responsible for corporate governance practices, monitoring regulatory affairs, including those of its operating businesses and involvement in governance-related issues of its subsidiaries as needed.
| NOTE 2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation and Accounting Principles
The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited financial statements on a consolidated basis. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, related statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation, prepared on an accrual basis, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 2022 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2022.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which are referred to herein as the “Financial Statements”, include the accounts of The Marygold Companies and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, USCF Investments, Gourmet Foods, Brigadier, Original Sprout, Marygold and Marygold UK are presented on a consolidated basis.
All inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Financial Statements are in conformity with U.S. GAAP which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash and highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand. Accounts in the United States are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000 per depositor, accounts in Canada are insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation up to CD$100,000 per depositor and accounts in the United Kingdom are insured by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme up to £85,000. Accounts in New Zealand are uninsured. The Company has, at times, held deposits in excess of insured amounts, but the Company does not expect any losses in such accounts.
Accounts Receivable, net and Accounts Receivable - Related Parties
Accounts receivable, net consist of receivables related to the Brigadier, Gourmet Foods and Original Sprout businesses. Management regularly reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes customer credit worthiness, customer concentrations, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to determine whether or not an account should be deemed uncollectible. Reserves, if any, are recorded on a specific identification basis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. As of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company had $
Accounts receivable - related parties consist of fund asset management fees receivable related to the USCF Investments business. Management fees receivable generally consist of one month of management fees which are collected in the month after they are earned. As of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, there is
Major Customers and Suppliers – Concentration of Credit Risk
The Marygold Companies, as a holding company, operates through its wholly owned subsidiaries and has no concentration of risk either from customers or suppliers as a stand-alone entity. Marygold, as newly formed development stage entity, had no revenues and no significant transactions for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021. Any transactions that did occur were included with those of the Company.
For our subsidiary, USCF Investments, the concentration of risk and the relative reliance on major customers are found within the various funds it manages and the associated three month revenues as of September 30, 2022 compared with those at September 30, 2021 along with the accounts receivable – related parties as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022 as depicted below.
| For the Three Months Ended | For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2022 | September 30, 2021 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | Revenue | |||||||||||||||
| Fund | ||||||||||||||||
| USO | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| BNO | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| UNG | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| USCI | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| All Others | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| As of September 30, 2022 | As of June 30, 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| Accounts Receivable | Accounts Receivable | |||||||||||||||
| Fund | ||||||||||||||||
| USO | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| BNO | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| UNG | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| USCI | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| All Others | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
The Marygold Companies, through Gourmet Foods and its wholly owned subsidiary, Printstock Products Limited, has two major customer groups comprising gross revenues: 1) baking, and 2) printing. For the purpose of segment reporting (Note 16), both revenue streams are considered part of the same "food industry" segment as they are evaluated as one segment by the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker.
Baking: Within the baking sector there are three major customer groups; 1) grocery, 2) gasoline convenience stores, and 3) independent retailers. The grocery industry is dominated by several large chain operations, which are customers of Gourmet Foods, and there are no long-term guarantees that these major customers will continue to purchase products from Gourmet Foods, however, many of the existing relationships have been in place for sufficient time to give management reasonable confidence in their continuing business. For the three month period ended September 30, 2022, Gourmet Foods’ largest customer in the grocery industry, who operates through a number of independently branded stores, accounted for approximately
In the gasoline convenience store market customer group, Gourmet Foods supplies two major channels. The largest is a marketing consortium of gasoline dealers operating under the same brand who, for the three month period ended September 30, 2022 accounted for approximately
The third major customer group is independent retailers and cafes, which collectively accounted for the balance of baking sales revenue, however no single customer in this group was a significant contributor of baking sales revenues for the three month period ended September 30, 2022 or September 30, 2021, nor a significant contributor to baking accounts receivable as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022.
Printing: The printing sector of Gourmet Foods' gross revenues is comprised of many customers, some large and some small, with one customer accounting for
Consolidated: With respect to Gourmet Foods’ consolidated risk, the largest
Gourmet Foods, including Printstock, is not dependent upon any one major supplier as many alternative sources are available in the local marketplace should the need arise. However, the unavailability of, or increase in price in, any of the ingredients on which Gourmet Foods relies to produce its products could harm its operating results for such period.
The Marygold Companies, through Brigadier, is partially dependent upon its contractual relationship with the alarm monitoring company who provides monitoring services to Brigadier’s customers. In the event this contract is terminated, Brigadier would be compelled to find an alternate source of alarm monitoring, or establish such a facility itself. Management believes that the contractual relationship is sustainable, and has been for many years, with alternate solutions available should the need arise. Sales to the largest customer, which includes contracts and recurring monthly support fees, totaled
Brigadier purchases alarm panels, digital and analog cameras, mounting hardware and accessory items needed to complete security installations from a variety of sources. The manufacture of electronic items such as those sought by Brigadier has expanded to a global scale thus providing Brigadier with a broad choice of suppliers. Brigadier bases its vendor selection on several criteria including: price, availability, shipping costs, quality, suitability for purpose and the technical support of the manufacturer. Brigadier is not reliant on any one supplier.
The Marygold Companies, through Original Sprout, sells its products through 3 channels to market: 1) direct sales to end users via online shopping carts, 2) sales through international wholesale distributors who, in turn, sell to other retailers or wholesalers, and 3) to retail stores selling to end users either from the shelf or online.
Original Sprout, has thousands of customers and, from time to time, certain customers become significant during specific reporting periods, but may not be significant during other periods. Original Sprout had no significant customer for the three month period ended September 30, 2022 as compared to the three month periods ended September 30, 2021 where one customer accounted for
The Marygold Companies, through Original Sprout, is dependent upon its relationship with a product packaging company who, at the direction of Original Sprout, produces the products in accordance with proprietary formulas, packages them in appropriate containers, and delivers the finished goods to Original Sprout for distribution to its customers. All of Original Sprout’s products are currently produced by this packaging company, although if this relationship were to fail there are other similar packaging companies available to Original Sprout at competitive pricing. Because of the nature of the Original Sprout product ingredients, some of the ingredients may, at times, be difficult to source in timely fashion or at the expected price point. To safeguard against this possibility, Original Sprout endeavors to maintain at least a 90-day supply of all products in stock. Estimating and maintaining a reserve stock account is not a guarantee that a shortage of ingredient supplies will not affect production such that Original Sprout will not exhaust its reserves or be unable to fulfill customer orders.
The Marygold Companies, through Marygold & Co. (UK), had no significant customer or vendor concentrations as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022.
Inventories
Inventories, consisting primarily of: (i) food products, printing supplies, and packaging in New Zealand; (ii) hair and skin care finished products and components in the U.S.; and, (iii) security system hardware in Canada, are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventories in Canada and New Zealand are maintained on the first-in, first-out method, while inventory in the U.S. is maintained using the average cost method. Inventories include product cost, inbound freight and warehousing costs where applicable. Management compares the cost of inventories with the net realizable value and an allowance is made for writing down the inventories to their net realizable value, if lower. An assessment is made at the end of each fiscal quarter to determine what slow-moving inventory items, if any, should be deemed obsolete and written down to their estimated net realizable value. For the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, the expense for slow-moving or obsolete inventory was $
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to earnings as incurred; additions, renewals and leasehold improvements are capitalized. Office furniture and equipment include office fixtures, computers, printers and other office equipment plus software and applicable packaging designs. Leasehold improvements, which are included in plant and equipment, are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement and the length of the lease. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset (see Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
| Category | Estimated Useful Life (in years) | |||
| Building | ||||
| Plant and equipment: | ||||
| Furniture and office equipment | ||||
| Vehicles | ||||
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of brand names, domain names, recipes, non-compete agreements and customer lists along with the internal use software in process for the business applications of Marygold to be launched in the coming fiscal year. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over the estimated useful life and are evaluated for impairment at least on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company assesses recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the discounted expected future cash flows. If the future discounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. There was
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination transaction. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter of the Company's fiscal year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. The Company first performs a qualitative test to determine if goodwill is impaired at a reporting unit. In performing this test, the Company evaluates macroeconomic factors, industry and market considerations, cost factors such as the increase in the cost of materials or labor or other costs, overall financial performance, changes in key personnel or customers or strategy, and other entity-specific events or trends that could indicate impairment, among other items. If the results of this test indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting is below its carrying value, a quantitative test is then performed to determine the amount of the impairment. When impaired, the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. There was
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company tests long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. Whenever any such impairment exists, an impairment loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. There was
Investments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Equity securities included in short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and debt securities are classified as trading securities. The Company measures the investments at fair value at period end with any changes in fair value reflected as unrealized gains or (losses) which is included as part of other (expense) income. The Company values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company (observable inputs) and (2) The Company’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 assets include the following: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).
Level 3 – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.
In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
The Company from time to time will issue warrant instruments to purchase common stock and accounts for warrant instruments as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the specific terms of the warrants and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity ("ASC 480") and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815"). Generally, warrants issued in connection with debt and equity financings are presented as a component of equity unless the warrants include a conditional obligation to issue a variable number of shares among other conditions, or it is possible that the Company may need to settle the warrants in cash, in which instance the warrants would be accounted for as non-current liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets. As of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022 all outstanding warrants are classified as equity instruments.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is measured based on grant date at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for stock options and the grant date closing stock price for restricted stock awards. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting term of four to five years. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. Stock-based compensation consists entirely of restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2022, and as such awards were granted during the three months ended September 30, 2022.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of fees earned through management of investment funds in the United States, fees earned in through the management of customer investments in the United Kingdom, sale of gourmet meat pies and printing of food wrappers in New Zealand, security alarm system installation and maintenance services in Canada, and sales of hair and skin care products internationally. Revenue is accounted for net of sales taxes, sales returns, and trade discounts. The performance obligation is satisfied when the product has been shipped and title, risk of loss and rewards of ownership have been transferred. For most of the Company’s product sales or services, these criteria are met at the time the product is shipped, the subscription period commences, or the management fees earned each month. For our Brigadier subsidiary in Canada, the Company operates under contract with an alarm monitoring company that pays a percentage of its recurring monitoring fee to Brigadier in exchange for continued customer service and support functions with respect to each customer maintained under contract by the monitoring company. The Company has no costs of contracts which require capitalization.
The Company generates revenue, in part, through contractual monthly recurring fees received for providing ongoing customer support services to monitoring company clientele. The five-step process governing contract revenue reporting includes:
| 1. | Identifying the contract(s) with customers; |
| 2. | Identifying the performance obligations in the contract; |
| 3. | Determining the transaction price; |
| 4. | Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and |
| 5. | Recognizing revenue when or as the performance obligation is satisfied. |
Transactions involve security systems that are sold outright to the customer where the Company's performance obligations include customer support services and the sale and installation of the security systems. For such arrangements, the Company allocates a portion of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative stand-alone selling price. Revenue associated with the sale and installation of security systems is recognized once installation is complete, and is reflected as security system revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Revenue associated with customer support services is recognized as those services are provided, and is included as a component of security system revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, which for the three months ended September 30, 2022, were approximately $
Because the Company has no contract with the end user, and the monthly payments for customer support services are made to the Company by the monitoring company who has a contract with the end user, and end user customers are subject to cancellation through no control of the Company, no deferred revenues or contingent liability reserves have been established with respect to these contracts. The services are deemed delivered as the obligation is acknowledged on a monthly basis.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefits or if future deductibility is uncertain.
When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Applicable interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of income.
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses the cost of advertising as incurred. Marketing and advertising costs for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021 were $
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Foreign Currency Translation
We record foreign currency translation adjustments and transaction gains and losses in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. The accounts of Gourmet Foods use the New Zealand dollar as the functional currency. The accounts of Brigadier Security System use the Canadian dollar as the functional currency, and the accounts of Marygold UK use the Great Britain pound as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and operating results are translated at the weighted average exchange rate throughout the period. Foreign currency transaction gains and (losses) can also occur if a transaction is settled in a currency other than the entity's functional currency. Accumulated currency translation gains and (losses) are classified as an item of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheet.
Segment Reporting
The Company defines operating segments as components for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performances. The Company allocates its resources and assesses the performance of its sales activities based on these segments (Refer to Note 16 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Business Combinations
We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows from acquired users, acquired trade names from a market participant perspective, useful lives and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. During the measurement period, which is one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. For the three months ended September 30, 2022 and year ended June 30, 2022 a determination was made that no adjustments were necessary.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Board Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and also issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19, ASU 2019-04, ASU 2019-05, ASU 2019-10, and ASU 2019-11, which replace the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected credit loss model and require a financial asset measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2022 (as amended by ASU 2019-10), including interim periods within that annual period. The Company anticipates the adoption of the standard will lead to changes in disclosures as well as insignificant changes related to the period of recognition of losses on its receivables.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The amendment is meant to simplify the accounting for convertible instruments by removing certain separation models in subtopic 470-20 for convertible instruments. The amendment also changed the method used to calculate diluted earnings per share ("EPS") for convertible instruments and for instruments that may be settled in cash. The amendment is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods for those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company anticipates the adoption of the standard will not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures given its current and anticipated operations.
| NOTE 3. | BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE |
Basic net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. This calculation includes the weighted average number of Series B Convertible Preferred shares outstanding also, as they are deemed to be substantially similar to the common shares and shareholders are entitled to the same liquidation and dividend rights. Potentially dilutive securities include the Series B Convertible Preferred Shares, outstanding unvested restricted stock awards, and outstanding warrants to purchase common stock. The treasury stock method is used to compute the potentially dilutive effect of outstanding warrants, stock options, and unvested restricted stock. Under this method, options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.
On August 25, 2021 the Company adopted the 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and had not issued any awards under the Plan as of June 30, 2022. During the quarter ending September 30, 2022 the Company issued
Basic and diluted net income per share reflects the effects of shares potentially issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred stock. The dilutive effect of nonvested restricted stock awards results in approximately
The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Net Income | Shares | Per Share | ||||||||||
| Basic net income per share: | ||||||||||||
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Net income available to preferred shareholders | $ | |||||||||||
| Basic net income per share | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Net Loss) | Shares | Per Share | ||||||||||
| Basic net loss per share: | ||||||||||||
| Net loss available to common shareholders | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net loss available to preferred shareholders | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||
| Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||
| NOTE 4. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories for Gourmet Foods, Brigadier and Original Sprout consisted of the following totals as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Raw materials | $ | $ | ||||||
| Supplies and packing materials | ||||||||
| Finished goods | ||||||||
| Total inventories | $ | $ | ||||||
| NOTE 5. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Plant and equipment | $ | $ | ||||||
| Furniture and office equipment | ||||||||
| Land and building | ||||||||
| Vehicles | ||||||||
| Solar energy system | ||||||||
| Total property, plant and equipment, gross | ||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | $ | ||||||
For the three months ended September 30, 2022 depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment totaled $
| NOTE 6. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Intangible assets consisted of the following as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Customer relationships | $ | $ | ||||||
| Brand name | ||||||||
| Domain name | ||||||||
| Recipes | ||||||||
| Non-compete agreement | ||||||||
| Internally developed software | ||||||||
| Total | ||||||||
| Less : accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net intangibles | $ | $ | ||||||
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS
On August 11, 2015, the Company acquired Gourmet Foods, Ltd. The fair value on the acquired customer relationships was estimated to be $
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Customer relationships | $ | |||||||
| Less: accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total customer relationships, net | $ | |||||||
BRAND NAME
On August 11, 2015, the Company acquired Gourmet Foods, Ltd. The fair value on the acquired brand name was estimated to be $
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Brand name | $ | $ | ||||||
| Less: accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total brand name, net | $ | $ | ||||||
DOMAIN NAME
On August 11, 2015, the Company acquired Gourmet Foods, Ltd. The fair value on the acquired domain name was estimated to be $
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Domain name | $ | $ | ||||||
| Less: accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total brand name, net | $ | $ | ||||||
RECIPES AND FORMULAS
On August 11, 2015, the Company acquired Gourmet Foods, Ltd. The fair value on the recipes was estimated to be $
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Recipes and formulas | $ | $ | ||||||
| Less: accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total recipes and formulas, net | $ | $ | ||||||
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
On June 2, 2016, the Company acquired Brigadier. The fair value on the acquired non-compete agreement was estimated to be $
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Non-compete agreement | $ | $ | ||||||
| Less: accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total non-compete agreement, net | $ | $ | ||||||
INTERNAL USE SOFTWARE
During the quarter ended December 31, 2020, Marygold began incurring expenses in connection with the internal development of software applications that are planned for eventual integration to its consumer Fintech offering. Certain of these expenses, totaling $
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
The total amortization expense for intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 was $
Estimated remaining amortization expenses of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years, are as follows:
| Years Ending June 30, | Expense | |||
| 2023 | $ | |||
| 2024 | ||||
| 2025 | ||||
| 2026 | ||||
| 2027 | ||||
| Thereafter | ||||
| Total | $ | |||
| NOTE 7. | OTHER ASSETS |
Other Current Assets
Other current assets totaling $
| As of September 30, 2022 | As of June 30, 2022 | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Other current assets | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
Investments
USCF Investments, from time to time, provides initial seed capital in connection with the creation of ETPs or ETFs that are managed by USCF or USCF Advisers. USCF Investments classifies these investments as current assets as these investments are generally sold within one year of the balance sheet date. Investments in which no controlling financial interest or significant influence exists are recorded at fair value with the change included in earnings on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Investments in which no controlling financial interest exists, but significant influence exists are recorded per the equity method of investment accounting unless the fair value option is elected under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 825, Fair Value Option. As of September 30, 2022 and June 30 2022, the Company owned $
All of the Company's short-term investments are classified as Level 1 assets as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022. Investments measured at estimated fair value consist of the following as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| September 30, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| Money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Other short-term investments | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term treasury bills | ||||||||||||||||
| Other equities | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Total short-term investments | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||
| June 30, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| Money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Other short term investments | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term treasury bills | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Other equities | ||||||||||||||||
| Total short-term investments | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||
During the three month and one year periods ended September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.
Restricted Cash
At September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, Gourmet Foods had on deposit (approximately and respectively, after currency translation) securing a lease bond for one of its properties. The cash securing the bond is restricted from access or withdrawal so long as the bond remains in place.
Long Term Assets
Other long-term assets totaling $
| (i) | $ | |
| (ii) | $ |
| NOTE 8. | GOODWILL |
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in business combinations.
Goodwill is comprised of the following amounts as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Goodwill – Original Sprout | ||||||||
| Goodwill – Gourmet Foods | ||||||||
| Goodwill – Brigadier | ||||||||
| Goodwill - Marygold & Co. (UK) | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
The Company tests for goodwill impairment at each reporting unit. There was
| NOTE 9. | ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Taxes payable | ||||||||
| Accrued payroll, vacation and bonus payable | ||||||||
| Accrued operating expenses | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
| NOTE 10. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Notes Payable - Related Parties
Notes payable totaling $
USCF Investments - Related Party Transactions
The Funds managed by USCF and USCF Advisers are deemed by management to be related parties. The Company’s USCF Investments revenues, totaling $
| NOTE 11. | LOANS - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
As of September 30, 2022, Brigadier had an outstanding principal balance of (approx. translated as of September 30, 2022) due to Bank of Montreal related to the purchase of its Saskatoon office land and building. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022 reflect the amount of the principal balance which is due within twelve months as a current liability of and respectively, and a long-term liability of and respectively. Interest on the mortgage loan for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 was and respectively.
| NOTE 12. | STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
Common Stock Issued in Underwritten Offering
On March 9, 2022, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) between the Company and Maxim Group LLC (the “Underwriter”), relating to the Company’s upsized underwritten public offering (the “Offering”) of
Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the public offering price was $
The Underwriting Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and agreements by the Company, customary conditions to closing, indemnification obligations of the Company and the Underwriter, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, other obligations of the parties and termination provisions. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Underwriting Agreement and related “lock-up” agreements, the Company, each director and executive officer of the Company and certain significant stockholders of the Company have agreed not to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of securities of the Company, without the prior written consent of the Underwriter, for a 180-day period, subject to certain limitations therein.
In exchange for the Underwriter’s services, the Company agreed to (i) sell the Common Stock to the Underwriter at a purchase price of $
On March 14, 2022, the Offering closed resulting in the Company selling a total of
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
On March 14, 2022, pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company issued the Underwriter’s Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of
Convertible Preferred Stock
The Company has
Each issued Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into
Stock-based Awards - Employees and Vendor Compensation
During the three months ending September 30, 2022 the Company's 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan issued
| Restricted Stock Outstanding as of September 30, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
| Balance as of June 30, 2022 | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Granted – restricted stock awards | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Vested | $ | |||||||||||
| Canceled | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Balance as of September 30, 2022 | $ | $ | ||||||||||
As of September 30, 2022, the total unrecognized compensation cost was $
There were shares issued for vendor services during the three months ending September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021.
| NOTE 13. | BUSINESS COMBINATIONS |
On August 17, 2021, our wholly-owned subsidiary Marygold UK entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) to acquire all the issued and outstanding shares of Tiger Financial and Asset Management Limited (“Tiger”), a company incorporated and registered in England and Wales and located in Northampton, England. Tiger is an asset manager and investment advisor operating pursuant to certification by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom with approximately million in assets under management as of June 20, 2022. The transaction closed on June 20, 2022 with an agreed purchase price of (translated to as of the closing date June 20, 2022), subject to adjustment as provided for in the SPA. As of June 20, 2022 approximately (translated to as of the closing date June 20, 2022) remained payable, (translated to as of the closing date June 20, 2022) was paid during the quarter ended September 30, 2022, with subsequent equal payments of due on December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, subject to downward adjustment per the terms of the SPA for an amount up to should existing clientele close their accounts prior to December 31, 2023. There is
| Item | Amount | |||
| Cash in bank | $ | |||
| Prepayments/deposits | ||||
| Plant, property and equipment | ||||
| Intangible assets | ||||
| Goodwill | ||||
| Tax liability | ( | ) | ||
| Deferred tax liability | ( | ) | ||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | ( | ) | ||
| Total Purchase Price | $ | |||
Supplemental Pro Forma Information (Unaudited)
The following unaudited supplemental pro forma information for the three months ended September 30, 2021, assumes the acquisition of Tiger had occurred as of July 1, 2021, giving effect on a pro forma basis to purchase accounting adjustments such as depreciation of property and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and acquisition related costs. The pro forma data is for informational purposes only and may not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations had Tiger been operated as part of the Company since July 1, 2021. Furthermore, the pro forma results do not intend to predict the future results of operations of the Company.
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 | |||||||
| Actual | Pro Forma | |||||||
| Net revenues | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net (loss) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| NOTE 14. | INCOME TAXES |
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial statement reported amounts, and for net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company records a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such asset will not be realized. The Company continues to monitor the likelihood that it will be able to recover its deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, the Company must increase its provision for income taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the authoritative guidance on income taxes under which the Company may only recognize or continue to recognize tax positions that meet a "more likely than not" threshold. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the provision for income taxes.
As of September 30, 2022, the Company's total unrecognized tax benefits were approximately $
The Company is required to make its best estimate of the annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year and use that rate to provide for income taxes on a current year-to-date basis. The Company recorded tax expense of $
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal, various states, Canada and New Zealand tax jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. The Company’s U.S. tax years through 2021 will remain open for examination by the federal and state authorities which is three and four years, respectively. The Company’s tax years from through remain open for examination by Canada and New Zealand authorities. As of September 30, 2022, there were no active taxing authority examinations.
| NOTE 15. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Lease Commitments
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, accrued expenses, and long-term operating lease liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Right-of-use assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. In determining the present value of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date. The operating lease right-of-use assets also include any lease payments made at or before the commencement date and are reduced by any lease incentives received. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or not terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that it will exercise any such options. For the majority of its leases, the Company concluded that it is not reasonably certain that any renewal options would be exercised, and, therefore, the amounts are not recognized as part of operating lease right-of-use assets nor operating lease liabilities. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less, and certain office equipment leases which are deemed insignificant, are not recorded on the balance sheet and expensed as incurred and included within rent expense under general and administrative expense. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.
The Company’s most significant operating leases are real estate leases of office, warehouse and production facilities. The remaining operating leases are primarily comprised of leases of printers and other equipment which are deemed insignificant. For all operating leases, the Company has elected the practical expedient permitted under Topic 842 to combine lease and non-lease components. As a result, non-lease components, such as common area or equipment maintenance charges, are accounted for as a single lease element.
The Company has one finance lease wherein ownership of the underlying asset will be transferred to the Company at the end of the lease term. The underlying asset of the finance lease is a solar energy system at our Gourmet Foods subsidiary in New Zealand that is included with property, plant and equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fixed lease expense payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease payments vary because of changes in facts or circumstances occurring after the commencement date, other than the passage of time. Certain of the Company’s operating lease agreements include variable payments that are passed through by the landlord, such as insurance, taxes, and common area maintenance. Variable payments are deemed immaterial, expensed as incurred, and included within rent expense under general and administrative expense.
The Company leases various facilities and offices throughout the world including the following subsidiary locations:
Gourmet Foods has operating leases for its office, factory and warehouse facilities located in Tauranga, New Zealand, and facilities leased by its subsidiary, Printstock, in Napier, New Zealand, as well as for certain equipment including printers and copiers. These leases are generally for -year terms, with some options to renew for an additional term. The leases mature between October 2022 and October 2026, and require monthly rental payments of approximately $
For three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, the combined lease payments of the Company and its subsidiaries totaled $
Future minimum consolidated lease payments for The Marygold Companies and its subsidiaries are as follows:
| Year Ended June 30, | Lease Amount | Finance Lease | ||||||
| 2023 | $ | $ | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||
| 2026 | ||||||||
| 2027 | ||||||||
| Thereafter | ||||||||
| Total minimum lease payments | ||||||||
| Less: present value discount | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total operating lease liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company's operating leases was
Additionally, Gourmet Foods entered into a General Security Agreement in favor of the Gerald O’Leary Family Trust and registered on the Personal Property Securities Register for a priority sum of (approximately ) to secure the lease of its primary facility. In addition, a (approximately ) bond has been posted through ANZ Bank and secured with a cash deposit of equal amount to secure a separate facilities lease. The General Security Agreement and the cash deposit will remain until such time as the respective leases are satisfactorily terminated in accordance with their terms. Interest from the cash deposit securing the lease accumulates to the benefit of Gourmet Foods and is listed as a component of interest income/expense on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Other Agreements and Commitments
USCF manages four Funds (BNO, CPER, UGA, UNL) which had expense waiver provisions during the prior fiscal year, whereby USCF reimburses funds when fund expenditure levels exceed certain threshold amounts. Effective May 1, 2021 USCF discontinued expense waiver reimbursements for BNO, CPER and UGA with only UNL continuing. As of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022 the expense waiver payable was $
As Marygold builds out its application it enters into agreements with various service providers. As of September 30, 2022, Marygold has future payment commitments with its primary service vendors totaling $
Litigation
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be involved in legal proceedings arising primarily from the ordinary course of their respective businesses. Except as described below there are no pending legal proceedings against the Company. USCF is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. USCF, as the general partner of the United States Oil Fund, LP ("USO") and the general partner and sponsor of the related public funds may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of its operations in the ordinary course of business. Except as described herein, USO and USCF are not currently party to any material legal proceedings.
Optimum Strategies Action
On April 6, 2022, USO and USCF were named as defendants in an action filed by Optimum Strategies Fund I, LP, a purported investor in call option contracts on USO (the “Optimum Strategies Action”). The action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut at Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00511.
The Optimum Strategies Action asserts claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act. It purports to challenge statements in registration statements that became effective in February 2020, March 2020, and on April 20, 2020, as well as public statements between February 2020 and May 2020, in connection with certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint seeks damages, interest, costs, attorney’s fees, and equitable relief.
USCF and USO intend to vigorously contest such claims and have moved for their dismissal.
Settlement of SEC and CFTC Investigations
On November 8, 2021, one of The Marygold Companies, Inc.’s (the “Company”) indirect subsidiaries, the United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”), together with United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”), for which USCF is the general partner, announced a resolution with each of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) relating to matters set forth in certain Wells Notices issued by the staffs of each of the SEC and CFTC, as detailed below.
On August 17, 2020, USCF, USO, and John Love received a “Wells Notice” from the staff of the SEC (the “SEC Wells Notice”). The SEC Wells Notice stated that the SEC staff made a preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against USCF, USO, and Mr. Love alleging violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
Subsequently, on August 19, 2020, USCF, USO, and Mr. Love received a Wells Notice from the staff of the CFTC (the “CFTC Wells Notice”). The CFTC Wells Notice stated that the CFTC staff made a preliminary determination to recommend that the CFTC file an enforcement action against USCF, USO, and Mr. Love alleging violations of Sections 4o(1)(A) and (B) and 6(c)(1) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6o(1)(A), (B), 9(1) (2018), and CFTC Regulations 4.26, 4.41, and 180.1(a), 17 C.F.R. §§ 4.26, 4.41, 180.1(a) (2019).
On November 8, 2021, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by USCF and USO, the SEC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 8A of the 1933 Act, directing USCF and USO to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(3) of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(3) (the “SEC Order”). In the SEC Order, the SEC made findings that, from April 24, 2020 to May 21, 2020, USCF and USO violated Section 17(a)(3) of 1933 Act, which provides that it is “unlawful for any person in the offer or sale of any securities . . . to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.” USCF and USO consented to entry of the SEC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction.
Separately, on November 8, 2021, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by USCF, the CFTC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 6(c) and (d) of the CEA, directing USCF to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 6o(1)(B), and CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(2), 17 C.F.R. § 4.41(a)(2) (the “CFTC Order”). In the CFTC Order, the CFTC made findings that, from on or about April 22, 2020 to June 12, 2020, USCF violated Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA and CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(2), which make it unlawful for any commodity pool operator (“CPO”) to engage in “any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant” and prohibit a CPO from advertising in a manner which “operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant,” respectively. USCF consented to entry of the CFTC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction.
Pursuant to the SEC Order and the CFTC Order, in addition to the command to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(3) of the 1933 Act, Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA, and CFTC Regulation 4.14(a)(2), civil monetary penalties totaling two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) in the aggregate were paid to the SEC and CFTC, of which one million two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,250,000) was paid by USCF to each of the SEC and the CFTC, respectively, pursuant to the offsets permitted under the orders. The SEC Order can be accessed at www.sec.gov and the CFTC Order can be accessed at www.cftc.gov.
In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation
On June 19, 2020, USCF, USO, John P. Love, and Stuart P. Crumbaugh were named as defendants in a putative class action filed by purported shareholder Robert Lucas (the “Lucas Class Action”). The Court thereafter consolidated the Lucas Class Action with two related putative class actions filed on July 31, 2020 and August 13, 2020, and appointed a lead plaintiff. The consolidated class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under the caption In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-04740.
On November 30, 2020, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint (the “Amended Lucas Class Complaint”). The Amended Lucas Class Complaint asserts claims under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, and Rule 10b-5. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint challenges statements in registration statements that became effective on February 25, 2020 and March 23, 2020 as well as subsequent public statements through April 2020 concerning certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint purports to have been brought by an investor in USO on behalf of a class of similarly-situated shareholders who purchased USO securities between February 25, 2020 and April 28, 2020 and pursuant to the challenged registration statements. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint seeks to certify a class and to award the class compensatory damages at an amount to be determined at trial as well as costs and attorney’s fees. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint named as defendants USCF, USO, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes III, as well as the marketing agent, ALPS Distributors, Inc., and the Authorized Participants: ABN Amro, BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs & Company, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation, Morgan Stanley & Company Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC, and Virtu Financial BD LLC.
The lead plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of its claims against BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, and UBS Securities LLC.
USCF, USO, and the individual defendants in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation intend to vigorously contest such claims and has moved for their dismissal.
Mehan Action
On August 10, 2020, purported shareholder Darshan Mehan filed a derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes, III (the “Mehan Action”). The action is pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda as Case No. RG20070732.
The Mehan Action alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to USO and failed to act in good faith in connection with a March 19, 2020 registration statement and offering and disclosures regarding certain extraordinary market conditions that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint seeks, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. All proceedings in the Mehan Action are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.
USCF, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest such claims.
In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation
On August 27, 2020, purported shareholders Michael Cantrell and AML Pharm. Inc. DBA Golden International filed two separate derivative actions on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Andrew F Ngim, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes, III, Nicholas D. Gerber, Robert L. Nguyen, and Peter M. Robinson in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York at Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 (the “Cantrell Action”) and Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06981 (the “AML Action”), respectively.
The complaints in the Cantrell and AML Actions are nearly identical. They each allege violations of Sections 10(b), 20(a) and 21D of the 1934 Act, Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and common law claims of breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. These allegations stem from USO’s disclosures and defendants’ alleged actions in light of the extraordinary market conditions in 2020 that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaints seek, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. The plaintiffs in the Cantrell and AML Actions have marked their actions as related to the Lucas Class Action.
The Court entered and consolidated the Cantrell and AML Actions under the caption In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 and appointed co-lead counsel. All proceedings in In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.
USCF, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest the claims in In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation. No accrual has been recorded with respect to the above legal matters as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022. We are currently unable to predict the timing or outcome of, or reasonably estimate the possible losses or range of, possible losses resulting from these matters. It is reasonably possible that this estimate will change in the near term. An adverse outcome regarding these matters could materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Other Contingencies
On December 2, 2021, Marygold became aware of certain activity indicative of potential fraud on its Fintech platform, which was still in beta testing stage of development, and associated with the opening of end-customer accounts. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K filing, Marygold estimates that approximately 80 end-customer accounts were opened fraudulently that resulted in approximately $
Retirement Plan
The Marygold Companies through its wholly owned subsidiary USCF Investments, has a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan ("401K Plan") covering U.S. employees, including Original Sprout and Marygold, who are over
| NOTE 16. | SEGMENT REPORTING |
With the acquisition of USCF Investments, Gourmet Foods, Brigadier, and the launch of the Original Sprout business unit of Kahnalytics, the Company has identified
The following table presents a summary of identifiable assets as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022.
| September 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | |||||||
| Identifiable assets: | ||||||||
| Corporate headquarters - including Marygold | $ | $ | ||||||
| U.S.A. : investment fund management - related party | ||||||||
| U.S.A. : beauty products | ||||||||
| New Zealand: food industry | ||||||||
| Canada: security systems | ||||||||
| U.K.: Financial services (1) | ||||||||
| Consolidated total | $ | $ | ||||||
(1) The assets of Marygold & Co. (UK) were included with corporate headquarters at June 30, 2022 and totaled translated as of June 30, 2022.
The following table presents a summary of operating information for the three months ended September 30:
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
| September 30, 2022 | September 30, 2021 | |||||||
| Revenues from external customers: | ||||||||
| U.S.A. : investment fund management - related party | $ | $ | ||||||
| U.S.A. : beauty products | ||||||||
| New Zealand : food industry | ||||||||
| Canada : security systems | ||||||||
| U.K.: Financial services | ||||||||
| Consolidated total | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net income (loss): | ||||||||
| U.S.A. : investment fund management - related party | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| U.S.A. : beauty products | ( | ) | ||||||
| New Zealand : food industry | ||||||||
| Canada : security systems | ||||||||
| U.K.: Financial services | ||||||||
| Corporate headquarters - including Marygold | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Consolidated total | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
The following table presents a summary of capital expenditures for the three month periods ended September 30:
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
| September 30, 2022 | September 30, 2021 | |||||||
| Capital expenditures: | ||||||||
| U.S.A.: investment fund management | $ | $ | ||||||
| U.S.A. : beauty products | ||||||||
| New Zealand: food industry | ||||||||
| Canada: security systems | ||||||||
| U.K.: Financial services | ||||||||
| U.S.A. : corporate headquarters - including Marygold | ||||||||
| Consolidated | $ | $ | ||||||
The following table represents the property, plant and equipment in use at each of the Company's locations as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022:
| As of September 30, 2022 | As of June 30, 2022 | |||||||
| Asset Location | ||||||||
| U.S.A.: investment fund management | $ | $ | ||||||
| U.S.A. : beauty products | ||||||||
| New Zealand: food industry | ||||||||
| Canada: security systems | ||||||||
| U.K.: Financial services | ||||||||
| U.S.A. : corporate headquarters - including Marygold | ||||||||
| Total All Locations | ||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net property, plant and equipment | $ | $ | ||||||
| NOTE 17. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
The Company evaluated subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued or filed. Nothing has occurred outside normal operations since that required recognition or disclosure in these financial statements apart from the events noted below.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto and is qualified in its entirety by the foregoing and by more detailed financial information appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. See "Financial Statements."
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our results and the timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part II of this report and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Form 10-K.
Overview
The Marygold Companies, Inc. (“The Marygold Companies” or the “Company”) conducts business through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries operating in the U.S., New Zealand, and Canada. Further, the Company anticipates operating in the United Kingdom upon the consummation of the pending acquisition of Tiger Financial & Asset Management Limited, a U.K. limited company. The operations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are more particularly described herein but are summarized as follows:
| ● |
USCF Investments, Inc. ("USCF Investments") (f/k/a Wainwright Holdings, Inc.), a U.S. based company, is the sole member of two investment services limited liability company subsidiaries, United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”), and USCF Advisers LLC (“USCF Advisers”), each of which manages, operates or is an investment advisor to exchange traded funds organized as limited partnerships or investment trusts that issue shares which trade on the NYSE Arca stock exchange.. |
|
| ● |
Gourmet Foods, Ltd., a New Zealand based company, manufactures and distributes New Zealand meat pies on a commercial scale and its wholly owned New Zealand subsidiary company, Printstock Products Limited, prints specialty wrappers for the food industry in New Zealand and Australia. (collectively "Gourmet Foods") |
|
| ● |
Brigadier Security Systems (2000) Ltd. (“Brigadier”), a Canadian based company, sells and installs commercial and residential alarm monitoring systems. |
|
| ● |
Kahnalytics, Inc. dba/Original Sprout (“Original Sprout”), a U.S. based company, is engaged in the wholesale distribution of hair and skin care products under the brand name Original Sprout on a global scale. |
|
| ● |
Marygold & Co., a newly formed U.S. based company, together with its wholly owned limited liability company, Marygold & Co. Advisory Services, LLC, (collectively "Marygold") was established by The Marygold Companies to explore opportunities in the financial technology ("Fintech") space, still in the development stage as of September 30, 2021, and estimated to launch commercial services in the current fiscal year. Through September 30, 2022, expenditures have been limited to developing the business model and the associated application development. |
|
| ● |
Marygold & Co. (UK) Limited, a newly formed U.K. limited company (“Marygold UK”), was established to act as a holding company for acquisitions to be made in the U.K. As of September 30, 2022, the accounts of Marygold UK are consolidated with its wholly owned subsidiary, Tiger Financial and Asset Management Limited. |
Because the Company conducts its businesses through its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, the risks related to our wholly owned subsidiaries are also risks that impact the Company's financial condition and results of operations. See, "Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies / Major Customers and Suppliers - Concentration of Credit Risk" in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more information. The emergence of a novel coronavirus on a global scale, known as COVID-19, and related geopolitical events could lead to increased market volatility, disruption to U.S. and world economies and markets and may have significant adverse effects on the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The financial risk to future operations is largely unknown, (refer to Part II, Item 1A, for further details.)
Results of Operations
The Marygold Companies and Subsidiaries
Financial summary and comparison data for the three month periods ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Revenue and Operating Income
Consolidated revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was $8.9 million representing a $0.8 million decrease from the three months ended September 30, 2021 revenue of $9.7 million. The decrease in consolidated revenues was primarily attributed to a decrease of $0.4 million in revenues of Gourmet Foods which were impacted by a strong U.S. Dollar where approximately $0.3 million of the decrease was due to currency translation and $0.1 million from lower same dollar sales. The remainder of the decrease came from USCF Investments where Assets Under Management ("AUM") for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was lower than that of 2021, which resulted in a revenue decrease of approximately $0.2 million, Original Sprout had a $0.2 million decrease and our Canadian subsidiary, Brigader, which experienced a $0.1 million decrease primarily due to currency translation. Our recent Marygold UK acquisition contributed $0.1 million to overall revenue vs. $0 during the three months ended September 30, 2021. The Marygold Companies produced an operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 of $0.8 million as compared to an operating loss of ($1.6) million for the three months ended September 30, 2021. This represents an increase in operating income of $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021 or approximately 147%. Apart from the $0.8 million decline in revenues, the difference in operating income is attributed to the expenses incurred by our subsidiary, Marygold & Co., in development of its mobile fintech app, which amounted to approximately $0.6 million, and a legal settlement of $2.5 million incurred by our USCF Investments subsidiary in the prior year quarter.
Other Income (Expenses)
Other (expense) income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 were ($54) thousand and $4 thousand, respectively, resulting in income (loss) before income tax of $0.7 million and ($1.6) million, respectively.
Income Tax
Provision for income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 are $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, primarily attributable to our United States operations through our USCF Investments subsidiary. Income tax expense recorded at The Marygold Companies level totaled $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022, while a tax expense of $0.2 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2021. The remaining income tax expense was recorded at the subsidiary level during the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021.
Net Income
Overall, the net income between the three months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021 increased by approximately $2.4 million, or approximately 126%, to approximately $0.5 million. The increase in net income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was primarily attributable to the prior year legal settlement cost of $2.5 million impacting last years net income coupled with $0.8 million in lower revenues offset by $0.6 million in lower cost of revenue and $0.1 million in lower operating expenses.
Comprehensive Income
After giving consideration to currency translation loss of approximately $0.3 million our comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was $0.2 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021 where there was a currency translation loss of $0.1 million which resulted in comprehensive loss of $2.0 million. Comprehensive gain and loss are comprised of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and effects in the valuation of our holdings in the U.K., New Zealand and Canada.
Investment Fund Management - USCF Investments
USCF Investments was founded as a holding company in March 2004 as a Delaware corporation with one subsidiary, Ameristock Corporation, which was an investment adviser to Ameristock Mutual Fund, Inc., a large cap value equity fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In January 2010, Ameristock Corporation was spun off as a standalone company. In May 2005, USCF was formed as a single member limited liability company in the state of Delaware. In June 2013, USCF Advisers was formed as a Delaware limited liability company and in July 2014, was registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. In November 2013, the USCF Advisers board of managers formed USCF ETF Trust (“ETF Trust”) as an open-end management investment company registered under the 1940 Act. The Trust is authorized to have multiple segregated series or portfolios. USCF Investments owns all of the issued and outstanding limited liability company membership interests of its subsidiaries, USCF and USCF Advisers, each a Delaware limited liability company and are affiliated companies. USCF serves as the general partner (“General Partner”) for various limited partnerships (“LP”) and sponsor (“Sponsor”) as noted below. USCF and USCF Advisers are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations generally applicable to the investment services industry. USCF is a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and the National Futures Association (the “NFA”) under the Commodities Exchange Act (“CEA”). USCF Advisers is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended and has registered as a CPO under the CEA. Exchange traded products (“ETPs”) issued or sponsored by USCF are required to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in accordance with the Securities Act of 1933. USCF Investments operates through USCF and USCF Advisers, which collectively operate twelve exchange-traded products (“ETPs”) and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”), regulated by the 1940 Act and 1933 Act, and listed on the NYSE Arca, Inc. (“NYSE Arca”) with a total of approximately $3.7 billion assets under management as of September 30, 2022. USCF Investments and subsidiaries USCF and USCF Advisers are collectively referred to as “USCF Investments” hereafter.
USCF currently serves as the General Partner or the Sponsor to the following commodity pools, each of which is currently conducting a public offering of its shares pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended:
| USCF as General Partner for the following funds |
|
| United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”) |
Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in May 2005 |
| United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”) |
Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in November 2006 |
| United States Gasoline Fund, LP (“UGA”) |
Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in April 2007 |
| United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (“USL”) |
Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in June 2007 |
| United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”) |
Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in June 2007 |
| United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (“BNO”) |
Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in September 2009 |
| USCF as fund Sponsor - each a series within the United States Commodity Index Funds Trust ("USCIF Trust") |
|
| United States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”) |
Series of the USCIF Trust created in April 2010 |
| United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”) |
Series of the USCIF Trust created in November 2010 |
USCF Advisers, a registered investment adviser, serves as the investment adviser to the funds listed below within the USCF ETF Trust (the “ETF Trust”) and has overall responsibility for the general management and administration for the ETF Trust. Pursuant to the current Investment Advisory Agreements, USCF Advisers provides an investment program for each of series within the ETF Trust and manages the investment of the assets.
| USCF Advisers as fund manager for each series within the USCF ETF Trust: |
|
| USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund ("SDCI") |
Fund launched May 2018 |
| USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ("UMI") |
Fund launched March 2021 |
| USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund ("GLDX") |
Fund launched November 2021 |
| USCF Dividend Income Fund ("UDI") |
Fund launched June 2022 |
All commodity pools managed by USCF and each series of the ETF Trust managed by USCF Advisers are collectively referred to as the “Funds” hereafter.
USCF Investments' revenue and expenses are primarily driven by the amount of AUM. USCF Investments earns monthly management and advisory fees based on agreements with each Fund as determined by the contractual basis point management fee structure in each agreement multiplied by the average AUM over the given period. Many of the company’s expenses are dependent upon the amount of AUM. These variable expenses include Fund administration, custody, accounting, transfer agency, marketing and distribution, and sub-adviser fees and are primarily determined by multiplying contractual fee rates by AUM. Total Operating Expenses are grouped into the following financial statement line items: General and Administrative, Marketing, Operations and Salaries and Compensation.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Revenue
Average AUM for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was at $3.9 billion, as compared to approximately $4.2 billion from the three months ended September 30, 2021 primarily due to a decrease in USO, CPER and BNO AUM partially offset by an increase in UNG and USCI AUM. As a result, the revenues from management and advisory fees decreased by approximately $238 thousand, or 4%, to $5.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021 where revenues from management and advisory fees totaled $5.7 million.
Expenses
USCF Investments total operating expenses for three months ended September 30, 2022 decreased by $2.5 million to $3.5 million, or approximately 41%, from $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021. $2.5 million of the decrease was due to the legal settlement cost which occurred in the prior year quarter. Variable expenses, as described above, decreased by $30 thousand due to a decrease in total AUM which included a $70 thousand decrease in variable marketing and distribution expenses, and fund accounting and administration expenses offset by a smaller increase of $40 thousand in sub-advisory fees related to increase in UMI AUM over the prior year quarter. General and administrative ("G&A") expenses of $585 thousand decreased $85 thousand from $670 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2022 compared to three months ended September 30, 2021, respectively. G&A expenses decreased primarily due to lower legal and professional expenses. Total marketing expenses remained at approximately $600 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021. Employee salaries and benefit compensation expenses were approximately $1.1 million for both three month periods ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021, respectively. Operations expenses remained flat at $1.1 million during the quarter compared to the prior year quarter.
Income
Operating income increased $2.2 million to $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 from a ($0.4) million operating loss for the three months ended September 30, 2021. The increase was due to the prior year legal settlement cost of $2.5 million. Other income (expense) was ($62) thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $6 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2021 due to unrealized losses in investments. Net income before income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2022 increased $2.2 million to $1.8 million compared to a net loss of ($0.4) million for three months ended September 30, 2021 due to a $0.2 million decrease in revenue as a result of lower AUM, as well as a $0.1 million increase in total expenses excluding the legal settlement cost.
Food Products - Gourmet Foods, Ltd. and Printstock Products Limited
Gourmet Foods, Ltd. was organized in its current form in 2005 (previously known as Pats Pantry Ltd). Pats Pantry was founded in 1966 to produce and sell wholesale bakery products, meat pies and patisserie cakes and slices, in New Zealand. Gourmet Foods, located in Tauranga, New Zealand, sells substantially all of its goods to supermarkets and service station chains with stores located throughout New Zealand. Gourmet Foods, Ltd. also has a large number of smaller independent lunch bars, cafes and corner dairies among the customer list, however they comprise a relatively insignificant dollar volume in comparison to the primary accounts of large distributors and retailers. On July 1, 2020, Gourmet Foods, Ltd. acquired the New Zealand company, Printstock Products Limited. Located in nearby Napier, New Zealand, Printstock prints wrappers for food products, including those used by Gourmet Foods, Ltd. Printstock is a wholly owned subsidiary of Gourmet Foods, Ltd. and its operating results are consolidated with those of Gourmet Foods, Ltd. from July 1, 2020 onwards.
Gourmet Foods operates exclusively in New Zealand and thus the New Zealand dollar is its functional currency. In order to consolidate The Marygold Companies’ reporting currency, the US dollar, with that of Gourmet Foods, The Marygold Companies records foreign currency translation adjustments and transaction gains and losses in accordance with ASC 830-30. The translation of New Zealand currency into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translations are included in foreign currency translation (loss) gain on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as well as accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income found on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Revenue
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2022 were $1.9 million with cost of goods sold of $1.3 million resulting in a gross profit of $0.6 million, or approximately 32% gross margin, as compared to the three month period ended September 30, 2021 where net revenues were $2.3 million and cost of goods sold were $1.7 million producing a gross profit of $0.6 million, or approximately 27%. The decrease in net revenues is attributed to a changing product mix affording better profit margins, but lower sales volume.
Expenses
Operating expenses, including wages and marketing, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021 were $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, producing an operating income of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, or approximately 13% operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 8% for the three months ended September 30, 2021. Other income totaled $5 thousand for three months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to $1 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2021.
Income
Income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was approximately $0.2 million after provision for income tax of $61 thousand as compared to a net income of $0.2 million after income tax provision of $48 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2021.
Security Systems - Brigadier Security Systems (2000) Ltd.
Brigadier, founded in 1985, is a leading electronic security company in the province of Saskatchewan. Brigadier has offices located in the urban areas of Saskatchewan, Canada; Brigadier Security Systems in Saskatoon, and operating as Elite Security in Regina. The company has a combined industry experience of over 135 years. Brigadier provides comprehensive security solutions including access control, camera systems, fire alarm monitoring panels, and intrusion alarms to home and business owners as well as government offices, schools, and public buildings. Their experience as the provider of choice on many large notable sites shows a commitment to design, service and support. Brigadier specializes, and is certified, in several major manufacturers’ products: Honeywell Security, Panasonic, Avigilon and JCI/DSC/Kantech security products. The company and staff are recognized for dedication to customer service with annual awards from SecurTek including being recipients of the Customer Retention, Service Excellence, and overall best dealer with the President’s Award. The company demonstrates a commitment to delivering outstanding quality to customers by the notable facilities, businesses, and homes they secure.
Brigadier is an authorized SecurTek dealer. SecurTek is owned by SaskTel which is Saskatchewan's leading Information and Communications Technology (ICT) provider with over 1.4 million customer connections across Canada. Under the terms of its authorized dealer contract with the monitoring company, Brigadier earns monthly payments during the term of the monitoring contract in exchange for performance of customer service activities on behalf of the monitoring company.
Brigadier operates exclusively in Canada and thus the Canadian dollar is its functional currency. In order to consolidate The Marygold Companies’ reporting currency, the U.S. dollar, with that of Brigadier, The Marygold Companies records foreign currency translation adjustments and transaction gains and losses in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. The translation of Canadian currency into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Revenue
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2022 were $0.6 million with cost of goods sold recorded as approximately $0.2 million, resulting in a gross profit of approximately $0.4 million with a gross margin of approximately 61% as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021 where net revenues were approximately $0.7 million with cost of goods sold of $0.3 million and a gross profit of $0.4 million, or approximately 52%.
Expenses
Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2022 were $0.3 million producing an operating profit of $0.1 million or approximately 19% as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2021 where operating profits were $0.1 million, or approximately 13%, with operating expenses of $0.3 million.
Income
Other income comprised of interest income, rental income and commission income totaled approximately $14 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2022, and provision for income tax expense was $23 thousand, resulting in net income after income taxes of approximately $0.1 million as compared to net income after income taxes of approximately $79 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2021 where other income totaled $7 thousand and income tax was $18 thousand.
Beauty Products - Original Sprout
Kahnalytics was founded in 2015 and adopted the dba/Original Sprout in December 2017. Original Sprout formulates and packages various hair and skin care products that are 100% vegan, tested safe and non-toxic, and marketed globally through distribution networks to salons, resorts, grocery stores, health food stores, e-tail sites and on the company's website. The company operates from warehouse and sales offices located in San Clemente, CA, USA. As a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Original Sprout has made adjustments to its primary channels to market. Prior to the pandemic Original Sprout relied heavily upon its wholesale distribution network to place products at retail locations and generally to make products available to consumers, whereas in the current environment of social distancing and closures of retail businesses the company found a significant drop in sales volumes as consumers avoided traditional sales outlets. Moreover, distributors found it more profitable to sell directly to consumers via ecommerce that to sell wholesale to resellers. The result was a dramatic downturn in the average selling price of Original Sprout products on ecommerce sites as distributors began selling to end users at wholesale price. In response to this trend, Original Sprout has established new sales channels with online retailers and also reconstructed many of its distribution agreements and pricing tiers. The positive effects of this transition are expected to be evident during the summer months of 2022, while the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the wholesale distribution business continues to disrupt the global marketplace. The result is that sales overall have been relatively stable during the pandemic, though derived from different sources, however profit margins have temporarily decreased as changes are implemented. The company has also incurred expenses related to new product development and creation of upcoming marketing collateral, which is expected to continue for the remainder of the fiscal year.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Revenue
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2022 were $0.8 million as compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021. Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021 were $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, resulting in a gross profit of approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, or 43% as compared to 41% gross margin. The decrease in revenues was due to the continuing trends of increased online shopping at lower prices and the loss of domestic distribution to hair salons and boutiques as a result of COVID restrictions in the U.S.
Expenses
Operating expenses were approximately $0.4 million resulting in an operating loss of $20 thousand, as compared to $0.4 million of operating expenses resulting in near breakeven at $4 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2021.
Income (Loss)
The net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was approximately $20 thousand as compared to $5 thousand net income for the three months ended September 30, 2021 where other income totaled $1 thousand.
Financial Services - Marygold & Co. (UK) Limited
Marygold & Co. (UK) Limited was formed in August 2021 as a wholly owned subsidiary of The Marygold Companies. There were no operations in Marygold UK until June 20, 2022 when the acquisition of Tiger Financial and Asset Management Limited was completed in the U.K. Tiger is a company incorporated and registered in England and Wales and located in Northampton, England. Tiger is an asset manager and investment advisor operating pursuant to certification by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom. Tiger derives revenues from providing ongoing investment advice to clients as a percentage of total Assets Under Management (‘AUM’) which, as of September 30, 2022, totaled approximately £35 million. Additionally, the company earns fees and commissions on the sale of insurance-based products and other financial instruments secured through third parties. Results of operations for the period from June 20, 2022 through June 30, 2022 were insignificant and thus combined with those of the parent. Because the company has only begun operations in the current fiscal year, there is no comparison data for the prior year period. The accounts of Tiger are consolidated with those of Marygold UK.
Marygold UK operates exclusively in the U.K. and thus the Great Britain Pound (“GBP”) is its functional currency. In order to consolidate The Marygold Companies’ reporting currency, the U.S. dollar, with that of Marygold UK, The Marygold Companies records foreign currency translation adjustments and transaction gains and losses in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. The translation of U.K. currency into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during the period.
For the three months ended September 30, 2022
Revenues
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2022 were $133 thousand, resulting in a gross profit of $9 thousand.
Expenses
Operating expenses were approximately $6 thousand resulting in an operating income of $3 thousand
Income
Net income, after giving consideration to income tax provision of $1 thousand, was $2 thousand.
Plan of Operation for the Next Twelve Months
Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to apply necessary resources, which may include experienced personnel, cash, or synergistic acquisitions made with cash, equity or debt, into growing each of our business units to their potential. Original Sprout is transitioning from a largely boutique offering distributed through specialty wholesalers to a more mainstream product available at traditional outlets and online and as such we anticipate measurable growth in revenues for the coming years, though there may be one-time initial expenses associated with the launch of new sales channels. Additionally, we are expecting moderate growth in Brigadier through focused management initiatives and consolidation within the security industry coupled with expanded product offerings. Similarly, we expect Gourmet Foods to be operating more efficiently under current management and continue to increase market share through additional product offerings and channels to market, including the printing and sale of food wrappers by their subsidiary, Printstock. USCF Investments expects to continue development of innovative and new fund products to grow its portfolio. In addition to our long-term mission that is an acquisition strategy based upon identifying and acquiring profitable, mature, companies of a diverse nature and with in-place management that produces increased revenue streams, the Company is also focused upon building expertise and developing Fintech opportunities in the financial services sector through its development stage subsidiary Marygold and Co. In a more general sense, the Company is characterizing its business in two categories: 1) financial services and 2) other consumer-based operating units. The purpose is to isolate the cyclical, and sometimes volatile, nature of the financial services business from our other industry segments. As revenues from financial services fluctuate over time due to varying performance of the commodities markets, our other operations are expected to be stable and sustainable by comparison. By these initiatives we seek to:
| ● |
continue to gain market share for our wholly owned subsidiaries’ areas of operation, |
|
| ● |
increase our gross revenues and realize net operating profits, |
|
| ● |
lower our operating costs by unburdening certain selling expenses to third party distributors, |
|
| ● |
have sufficient cash reserves to pay down accrued expenses and losses, |
|
| ● |
attract parties who have an interest in selling their privately held companies to us, |
|
| ● |
achieve efficiencies in accounting and reporting through adoption of standards used by all subsidiaries on a consistent basis, |
|
| ● |
strategically pursue additional company acquisitions, and |
|
| ● |
explore opportunities as may present themselves in the Fintech space, including the launch of services by Marygold and Marygold Advisory Services, and the creation of new corporate entities as focused subsidiary holdings. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Marygold Companies is a holding company that conducts its operations through its subsidiaries. At the holding-company level, its liquidity needs relate to operational expense, the funding of additional business acquisitions and new investment opportunities. Our operating subsidiaries' principal liquidity requirements arise from cash used in operating activities, debt service, and capital expenditures, including purchases of equipment and services, operating costs and expenses, and income taxes. Cash is managed at the holding company or the subsidiary level. There are no limitations or constraints on the movement of funds between the entities.
As of September 30, 2022, we had $13.4 million of cash and cash equivalents on a consolidated basis as compared to $12.9 million as of June 30, 2022.
During the past five fiscal years combined, The Marygold Companies has invested an aggregate of approximately $6.6 million in cash towards purchasing and assimilating Printstock within Gourmet Foods, and adding the Original Sprout assets into the The Marygold Companies group of companies as well as forming a new U.K. limited company, Marygold UK, and funding it with enough capital to pay approximately $1.8 million in cash towards the $2.9 million purchase price of its subsidiary, Tiger. We have also invested approximately $6.1 million in the development of Fintech applications through our development stage subsidiary, Marygold. Despite these cash investments and expenses, our working capital position remains strong at $21 million. While The Marygold Companies intends to maintain and improve its revenue stream from wholly owned subsidiaries, The Marygold Companies continues to pursue acquisitions of other profitable companies which meet its target profile. Provided The Marygold Companies’ subsidiaries continue to operate as they are presently, and are projected to operate, The Marygold Companies has sufficient capital to pay its general and administrative expenses for the coming fiscal year and to adequately pursue its long-term business objectives. However, given the significant economic and financial market disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Lease Liability
In relation to the adoption of ASC 842, the Company recognized $1,150,916 of operating lease liabilities on July 1, 2019. The total amount due under these obligations was $1,171,073 and $1,404,880 as of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively. The obligations will reduce over the passage of time through periodic lease payments. See Note 15 for further analysis of this obligation.
Borrowings
As of September 30, 2022, we had $0.4 million of third-party indebtedness on a consolidated basis as compared to $0.5 million of third-party indebtedness as of June 30, 2022. Approximately US$340,235 is owed by Brigadier and secured with the land and building in Saskatoon purchased in July 2019. The initial principal balance was CD$525,000 (approximately US$401,000 translated as of the loan date July 1, 2019) with an annual interest rate of 4.14% maturing June 30, 2024. The short-term portion of principal for this loan due within 12 months as of September 30, 2022 is CD$19,711 (approximately US$14,384) and the long term principal amount due is CD$446,539 (approximately US$325,851). Interest on the loan is expensed or accrued as it becomes due. Interest expense on the loan for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 was US$3,706 and US$4,048, respectively.
In addition to the loan due by Brigadier, our subsidiary, Gourmet Foods, on December 21, 2021 entered into a finance lease agreement related to a solar energy system. The present value of the leased asset is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with property, plant and equipment as US$118,944. The solar assets are amortized over a life span of 10 years with monthly payments, including GST, totaling $4,480 for the three months ended September 30, 2022.
The Marygold Companies, without inclusion of its subsidiary companies, as of September 30, 2022, has no debt.
Investments
USCF Investments, from time to time, provides initial investments in the creation of ETP funds that USCF Investments manages. USCF Investments classifies these investments as current assets as these investments are generally sold within one year from the balance sheet date. As of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, USCF Investments held an initial investment position of $1.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in one of its 40 Act funds, GLDX. This investment along with other investments, as applicable, are described further in Note 7 to our Financial Statements.
Dividends
Our strategy on dividends is to declare and pay dividends only from retained earnings and only when our Board of Directors deems it prudent and in the best interests of the Company to declare and pay dividends. We paid no dividends during the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021.
| Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
As a "smaller reporting company", we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
| Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Marygold Companies maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurances that the information required to be disclosed in The Marygold Companies’ periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures and any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
The duly appointed officers of The Marygold Companies, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, who perform functions equivalent to those of a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of The Marygold Companies, have evaluated the effectiveness of The Marygold Companies’ disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of The Marygold Companies were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
(b) Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarterly period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
| Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be involved in legal proceedings arising primarily from the ordinary course of their respective businesses. Except as described below there are no pending legal proceedings against the Company. USCF is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. USCF, as the general partner of USO and the general partner and sponsor of the related public funds may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of its operations in the ordinary course of business. Except as described herein, USO and USCF are not currently party to any material legal proceedings.
Optimum Strategies Action
On April 6, 2022, USO and USCF were named as defendants in an action filed by Optimum Strategies Fund I, LP, a purported investor in call option contracts on USO (the “Optimum Strategies Action”). The action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut at Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00511.
The Optimum Strategies Action asserts claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act. It purports to challenge statements in registration statements that became effective in February 2020, March 2020, and on April 20, 2020, as well as public statements between February 2020 and May 2020, in connection with certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint seeks damages, interest, costs, attorney’s fees, and equitable relief.
USCF and USO intend to vigorously contest such claims and have moved for their dismissal.
Settlement of SEC and CFTC Investigations
On November 8, 2021, one of The Marygold Companies, Inc.’s (the “Company”) indirect subsidiaries, the United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”), together with United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”), for which USCF is the general partner, announced a resolution with each of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) relating to matters set forth in certain Wells Notices issued by the staffs of each of the SEC and CFTC, as detailed below.
On August 17, 2020, USCF, USO, and John Love received a “Wells Notice” from the staff of the SEC (the “SEC Wells Notice”). The SEC Wells Notice stated that the SEC staff made a preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against USCF, USO, and Mr. Love alleging violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
Subsequently, on August 19, 2020, USCF, USO, and Mr. Love received a Wells Notice from the staff of the CFTC (the “CFTC Wells Notice”). The CFTC Wells Notice stated that the CFTC staff made a preliminary determination to recommend that the CFTC file an enforcement action against USCF, USO, and Mr. Love alleging violations of Sections 4o(1)(A) and (B) and 6(c)(1) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6o(1)(A), (B), 9(1) (2018), and CFTC Regulations 4.26, 4.41, and 180.1(a), 17 C.F.R. §§ 4.26, 4.41, 180.1(a) (2019).
On November 8, 2021, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by USCF and USO, the SEC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 8A of the 1933 Act, directing USCF and USO to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(3) of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(3) (the “SEC Order”). In the SEC Order, the SEC made findings that, from April 24, 2020 to May 21, 2020, USCF and USO violated Section 17(a)(3) of 1933 Act, which provides that it is “unlawful for any person in the offer or sale of any securities . . . to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.” USCF and USO consented to entry of the SEC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction.
Separately, on November 8, 2021, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by USCF, the CFTC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 6(c) and (d) of the CEA, directing USCF to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 6o(1)(B), and CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(2), 17 C.F.R. § 4.41(a)(2) (the “CFTC Order”). In the CFTC Order, the CFTC made findings that, from on or about April 22, 2020 to June 12, 2020, USCF violated Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA and CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(2), which make it unlawful for any commodity pool operator (“CPO”) to engage in “any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant” and prohibit a CPO from advertising in a manner which “operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant,” respectively. USCF consented to entry of the CFTC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction.
Pursuant to the SEC Order and the CFTC Order, in addition to the command to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(3) of the 1933 Act, Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA, and CFTC Regulation 4.14(a)(2), civil monetary penalties totaling two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) in the aggregate were paid to the SEC and CFTC, of which one million two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,250,000) was paid by USCF to each of the SEC and the CFTC, respectively, pursuant to the offsets permitted under the orders. The SEC Order can be accessed at www.sec.gov and the CFTC Order can be accessed at www.cftc.gov.
In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation
On June 19, 2020, USCF, USO, John P. Love, and Stuart P. Crumbaugh were named as defendants in a putative class action filed by purported shareholder Robert Lucas (the “Lucas Class Action”). The Court thereafter consolidated the Lucas Class Action with two related putative class actions filed on July 31, 2020 and August 13, 2020, and appointed a lead plaintiff. The consolidated class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under the caption In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-04740.
On November 30, 2020, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint (the “Amended Lucas Class Complaint”). The Amended Lucas Class Complaint asserts claims under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, and Rule 10b-5. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint challenges statements in registration statements that became effective on February 25, 2020 and March 23, 2020 as well as subsequent public statements through April 2020 concerning certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint purports to have been brought by an investor in USO on behalf of a class of similarly-situated shareholders who purchased USO securities between February 25, 2020 and April 28, 2020 and pursuant to the challenged registration statements. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint seeks to certify a class and to award the class compensatory damages at an amount to be determined at trial as well as costs and attorney’s fees. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint named as defendants USCF, USO, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes III, as well as the marketing agent, ALPS Distributors, Inc., and the Authorized Participants: ABN Amro, BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs & Company, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation, Morgan Stanley & Company Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC, and Virtu Financial BD LLC.
The lead plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of its claims against BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, and UBS Securities LLC.
USCF, USO, and the individual defendants in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation intend to vigorously contest such claims and have moved for their dismissal.
Mehan Action
On August 10, 2020, purported shareholder Darshan Mehan filed a derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes, III (the “Mehan Action”). The action is pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda as Case No. RG20070732.
The Mehan Action alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to USO and failed to act in good faith in connection with a March 19, 2020 registration statement and offering and disclosures regarding certain extraordinary market conditions that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint seeks, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. All proceedings in the Mehan Action are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.
USCF, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest such claims.
In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation
On August 27, 2020, purported shareholders Michael Cantrell and AML Pharm. Inc. DBA Golden International filed two separate derivative actions on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Andrew F Ngim, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes, III, Nicholas D. Gerber, Robert L. Nguyen, and Peter M. Robinson in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York at Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 (the “Cantrell Action”) and Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06981 (the “AML Action”), respectively.
The complaints in the Cantrell and AML Actions are nearly identical. They each allege violations of Sections 10(b), 20(a) and 21D of the 1934 Act, Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and common law claims of breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. These allegations stem from USO’s disclosures and defendants’ alleged actions in light of the extraordinary market conditions in 2020 that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaints seek, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. The plaintiffs in the Cantrell and AML Actions have marked their actions as related to the Lucas Class Action.
The Court entered and consolidated the Cantrell and AML Actions under the caption In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 and appointed co-lead counsel. All proceedings in In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.
USCF, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest the claims in In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation. No accrual has been recorded with respect to the above legal matters as of September 30, 2022 and 2021. We are currently unable to predict the timing or outcome of, or reasonably estimate the possible losses or range of, possible losses resulting from these matters. It is reasonably possible that this estimate will change in the near term. An adverse outcome regarding these matters could materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
| Risk Factors |
The Marygold Companies and its subsidiaries (referred to herein as “we,” “us,” “our” or similar expressions) are subject to certain risks and uncertainties in its business operations. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our registration statement, as amended, filed December 7, 2021 and the September 22, 2021 filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our registration statement and Annual Report are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our registration statement, as amended, filed on December 7, 2021, the related prospectus, and the September 28, 2022 filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risk factors should be read in connection with the other information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our financial statements and the related notes.
| Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
| Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
| Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not applicable.
| Other Information |
None.
| Exhibits |
The following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-Q:
| 3.1 |
|
| 3.2 |
|
| 3.3 |
|
| 3.4 |
|
| 3.5 |
|
| 3.6 |
|
| 10.1 |
|
| 10.2* |
|
| 10.3* |
|
| 10.4* |
|
| 10.5* |
|
| 31.1 |
|
| 31.2 |
|
| 32.1 |
|
| 32.2 |
* Indicates management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
| 101.INS |
Inline XBRL Instance Document# |
| 101.SCH |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document# |
| 101.CAL |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document# |
| 101.LAB |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document# |
| 101.PRE |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document# |
| 101.DEF |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document# |
| 104 |
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| THE MARYGOLD COMPANIES, INC. |
|||
| Dated: November 14, 2022 |
By: |
/s/ Nicholas Gerber |
|
| Nicholas Gerber |
|||
| Principal Executive Officer |
|||
| By: |
/s/ Stuart Crumbaugh |
||
| Stuart Crumbaugh |
|||
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|||